Las Vegas Post Acute & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 136 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 209 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 77.3 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.64 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.15 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a vulnerable resident was protected following physical abuse allegation for 1 of 4 sampled residents (R1). The deficient practice had the potential to result in increased fear, anxiety, emotional distress, and an increased risk of psychosocial harm.Findings include:Resident 1 (R1) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including difficulty in walking and generalized muscle weakness.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, indicating R1's cognitive status was intact. The assessment documented that R1 required extensive assistance with activities of daily living and was dependent on staff for transfers and incontinent care.The Nursing Staff Assignment and Sign in Sheet dated 06/01/2026, documented the involved CNA was assigned in room [ROOM NUMBER]A wherein R1was residing in 101.A typewritten statement by Social Services…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 3). The deficient practice placed residents at risk for emotional distress.Findings include:1) Resident 3 (R3) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including complete lesion at thoracic vertebra (T11-T12) and chronic kidney disease stage four.On 04/06/2026 at 9:30 AM, R3 had a bandage on the left hand dated 04/05. R3 recounted having an altercation with a former roommate whom R3 described as a crazy person who yelled at staff all day. R3 indicated upon being told to stop yelling, R4 hit R3 with a telephone on the left hand. R3 touched bandage on left hand indicating this was the injury which resulted from the incident.A Resident Event form dated 03/27/2026, documented R3 was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation with roommate.An Incident Narrative dated 03/27/2026, documented R4 hit R3 with a phone on the hand R3 refused X-ray…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of physical abuse were submitted to the state agency within 24 hours of the facility being informed of the allegation for 2 of 2 reports reviewed. The deficient practice placed residents at risk for abuse.Findings include: 1) Resident 1 (R1) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including multiple fractures from motor vehicular accident and depression.A Facility Incident Report revealed R1 alleged a certified nursing assistant (CNA) on hit R1 on the face on 02/14/2026 at approximately 8:10 PM, after R1 used foul language toward the CNA. Law enforcement came to the facility to interview R1, R1's roommate and the CNA of concern.On 04/06/2026 at 9:08 AM, the Charge Nurse on duty on the evening of the incident indicated completing a Report Event form for the Director of Nursing (DON) and an Incident Narrative form dated 02/14/2026, which was a written form of communicating the alleged physical abuse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence foot wound treatments were provided per the physician's order for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident 84). The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for delayed healing of a wound.Findings include:Resident 84 (R84) was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and arthropathic psoriasis.On 07/16/2025 at 8:52 AM, R84 explained that they had wounds on both feet and back and the staff performing wound care went on leave and no one provided wound treatment. A Physician Order dated 06/19/2025 documented cleanse right foot with normal saline, pat dry, apply Clobetasol 0.05% cream and leave open to air every day for 30 days for diagnosis of psoriasis A Physician Order dated 06/19/2025 documented cleanse left foot with normal saline, pat dry, apply Clobetasol 0.05% cream and leave open to air every day…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure medication was properly labeled and stored. The deficient practice had the potential for non-viable medication to be administered to a resident. Findings include:On 07/17/2025 at 3:44 PM, inside the 300 Hall medication cart was a multi-dose vial of Applisol purified protein derivative (PPD) Tuberculosis (TB) 1 milliliter vial. The box of the vial had a labeled date of 7/10. The nurse in charge of the medication cart was not able to determine if the labeled date was the open date or the discard date. The nurse confirmed the labeling of the medication was not clear and should have been labeled with an open and discard date. The nurse indicated the medication should have been kept in the medication refrigerator and medication kept outside its recommended storage temperature would have rendered it not safe to be administered. The facility policy titled Storage of Medications revised November 2020, documented drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored in locked compartments under proper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure preventative maintenance (PM) was performed annually for medical equipment being used for 2 of 23 sampled residents (Resident 30 and 40). The deficient practice had the potential for a resident not to receive the intended function of a medical device.Findings include:1) Resident 30 (R30) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebral infarction and physical debility.R30's physician's order dated 11/12/2024, documented to administer Oxygen at 2 liters via nasal canula continuously.On 07/16/2025 at 10:08 AM, R30's Oxygen concentrator (a medical device that extracts oxygen from ambient air and delivers it to a patient) had a PM sticker documented PM date: 05/23/2023, Due 05/24/2024. R30 received supplemental Oxygen from the same medical equipment.On 07/16/2025 at 10:15 AM, the maintenance personnel checked the medical equipment and confirmed the PM was outdated and should have been serviced more than a year ago.2) Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level two referral was completed for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 52). The deficient practice had the potential for residents to not receive necessary behavioral health services. Findings include: Resident 52 (R52) R52 was admitted on [DATE], with primary diagnoses including hypertension, neuropathy, atrial fibrillation, and right hip fracture. A PASARR level one document dated 03/22/2022, revealed R52 did not have dementia, mental illness (MI), intellectual disability, (ID) mental retardation (MR) or any related condition (RC) and was deemed appropriate for nursing facility placement. The resident face sheet noted on 10/01/2022, R52 had been diagnosed with dementia. A Psychiatry Note dated 05/29/2024 revealed R52 had disorganized thought process and limited concentration and insight. The resident had a neurocognitive disorder with intermittent agitation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0660 — isolated
  Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence a discharge plan was initiated and discussed with the resident and/or resident representative for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 190). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident to be unprepared for discharge. Findings include: Resident 190 (R190) R190 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (bipolar type) and suicidal ideations. The admission Care Plan dated 06/12/2024, documented the interventions to be provided to R190 which included to begin discharge planning. R190's medical record lacked documented evidence a discharge plan was initiated and discussed with the resident and/or resident representative. On 06/28/2024 at 7:29 AM, the Social Services (SS) Director indicated the SS Assistant would have talked to the resident and/or resident representative within 24 hours upon admission and discussed briefly about discharge planning. The SS Director would…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications were initially ordered for a duration not to exceed 14 days for 3 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 11, 64, and 188); and consents for the administration of psychotropic medications were obtained for 2 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 64 and 188). The deficient practices had the potential to cause an adverse medication effect and not honoring the resident's rights to be fully informed of the care and services being provided. Findings include: 1) Resident 11 (R11) R11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including generalized anxiety. On 06/27/24 at 9:20 AM, R11 reported taking a medication to treat symptoms of intermittent anxiety. The resident reported they asked a nurse for the medication when the symptoms occurred. A physician order dated 05/24/2024 indicated to give Alprazolam (an antianxiety agent) 0.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth every six hours as needed for anxiety manifested by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure dietary orders were followed for a resident on a renal diet for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 47). This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for weight loss. Findings include: Resident 47 (R47) R47 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, anemia, debility, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and hypertension. The admission Care Plan dated 06/07/2024, indicated the resident required skilled nursing due to the need to medically manage assistance with meals, offering and encouraging fluid intake, monitoring of weekly weights, and providing and serving diet as ordered to avoid any declines in nutrition. A Physician Order dated 05/31/2024, with a start date of 06/08/2024 documented a renal diet, with regular texture, and thin liquids. A telephone Physician admission Orders form dated 06/07/2024, indicated a renal diet consisting of regular textures with thin liquids. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $821K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NV