Citrus Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 124 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 148 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 90.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.13 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide routine supervision and monitoring for one of 93 residents (Resident 1) and failed to implement interventions developed to help prevent an elopement (unauthorized and unsupervised exit from the facility) when: 1) On August 1, 2023, staff was unaware Resident 1 (a confused resident with cognitive deficit and required assistance with walking) had eloped from the facility. In addition, it was not identified Resident 1 was missing from the facility despite Resident 1 not being present during the evening meal (Resident 1 required direct 1:1 [one to one] staff assistance during mealtime). This failure resulted in Resident 1 subsequently being found (by non-facility staff) in a neighboring backyard unresponsive, on the ground, and covered with vomit. Resident 1 required hospitalization and intubation (a tube placed through the airway to help the resident breath when they are unable to breath on their own). This also had the potential to result in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe infection control practices and sanitary environment were followed when:a. Resident 101's oxygen nasal cannula tubing (device used to deliver oxygen into the nose via a tube) was found unlabeled and undated.b. Resident 84's oxygen tubing (is a small flexible plastic tube that connects to an oxygen source) [like machine or tank] was not labeled and dated per facility's policy and procedure (P&P). c. A facility's janitor ([DATE]) removed multiple pillows from several trash containers and placed them on a handrail at the facility's rear entrance/exit next to the laundry room.These failures had the potential to spread infectious disease (disease caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi or parasite) to 85 medically compromised residents and staff in the facility.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 101's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), the “admission Record” indicated Resident 101 was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for residents who reside in the facility when on July 29, 2025, the North hallway shower room was found to have black substance on the shower stalls.This failure had the potential to exposed the residents using this shower room to increased risks of developing allergies, skin irritation, and serious respiratory issues.Findings:During an observation on July 29, 2025, at 2:30 PM in the residents' shower room in North hallway, the three shower stalls were found to have a black substance on the shower stalls floors, walls, and where the wall meets the floor and the ceiling. The substance was also present on the wall joints, and on and between the tiles. During an interview on July 29, 2025, at 2:40 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) confirmed and stated that this shower room is used by all residents in North hallway.During a concurrent observation and interview with the Environmental Services Director of Maintenance (ESD) on July 29, 2025, at 2:58 PM, the ESD…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff accurately and consistently monitored and documented fluid intake and output (intake refers to the total amount of fluids a person consumes, while output refers to the total amount of fluids the body eliminates) for one of one resident reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident 100), when Resident 100's intake and output record had blanks (no data recorded), documentation was not in the correct milliliter (ml - unit of measure) format, and there was no policy and procedure regarding monitoring and documenting intake and output as specified in Resident 100's care plan (an individualized plan for the medical care of a resident).These failures resulted in inconsistencies in the monitoring and documentation of Resident 100's intake and output which had the potential for Resident 100's medical record to inaccurately portray his fluid balance, and functional urinary status.Findings:During a review of Resident 100's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Order Summary Diet Order (a list of provider orders) was followed for one of three residents (Resident 21) reviewed for dining observations when Resident 21 did not receive his physician ordered Boost VHC ( nutritional supplement, very high calories) with meals for lunch on July 29, 2025 and for breakfast on July 30, 2025.These failures had the potential to have contributed to Resident 21's weight loss.Findings:During a review of Resident 21's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), it indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses which included Myocardial infraction (heart attack), Dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and immunodeficiency( a condition where the body's immune system is weakened, making it less able to fight off infections and diseases).During a review of Residents 21's Order Summary Diet Order, dated July 18, 2025, the Order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate records of controlled medications (medications that are controlled by the government because it may be abused or cause addiction) for one of three sampled medication carts (South Cart ) with narcotics when Resident 100's Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form (CDR - document used to record the administration or destruction of a controlled drug for tracking purposes) was found to be inaccurate.This failure had the potential to place the facility at risk for drug diversion (illegal distribution of controlled drugs for any illicit use) of controlled medications by staff .Findings:During a review of Resident 100's clinical records, the admission Record, indicated Resident 100 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, pressure ulcers stage 4 (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, or bone), Type two diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical supplies were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles when an intravenous (giving medications through the vein) (IV) cart (a mobile cart used to store and transport medications and other supplies to patients) was found with expired supplies.These failures had the potential for the supplies to be less effective and compromised health and safety for the highly vulnerable population of 85 Residents in the facility.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE], at 12:23 PM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), the intravenous (IV) cart (a mobile storage unit designated to hold and transport medical supplies for intravenous medication and other treatment) was inspected. The following items were found expired and available for use:1. Six alcohol swabs (small, disposable pads or wipes that are saturated with isopropyl alcohol) were found with the following expiration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately protect and safeguard the healthcare identifiable information for two out of 25 sampled residents (Resident 7 and 89) when on July 30, 2025, the laptop screen of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) (electronic form of record keeping) used by Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3) were:1. Left open, unsecured and unattended from 05:44 AM to 5:47 AM, for a total of 3 minutes in the North hallway for Resident 7.2. Left open, unsecured and unattended from 6:08 AM AM to 6:12 AM, for a total of 4 minutes in the North hallway for Resident 89. This failure resulted in the exposure of health-related identifiable information for Residents 7 and 89 when records were left unsecured and unattended in a location easily accessible to residents, visitors, and other unauthorized individuals, which led to a breach of resident confidentiality, violations of resident's privacy, potential loss of sensitive personal information.Findings:1. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper care was provided to prevent a blister (a painful swelling on the surface of the skin), for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure placed a clinically compromised Residents (Resident 1) health and safety at risk, when a facility acquired blister to the right heel (back of the human foot below the ankle) developed while in the facility. Findings: During a review of Residents 1 ' s admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease in which there is too much sugar in the blood and the body is not able to control the sugar ), muscle wasting and atrophy (a condition with shrinking and loss of muscle), and depression (a condition with feeling of sadness and hopelessness). During an interview on November 19, 2024, at 8::55 AM, with Resident 1, Resident stated, They told me, I got a blister on my…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutrition status for 2 out of 40 residents (Residents 13 and 62) reviewed for nutrition when: 1. Resident 62 lost 18% of his body weight in the last 6 months. Since September 5, 2021, he had poor food intake. Three different registered dietitians recommended an appetite stimulant on September 28, 2021, October 7, 2021, and March 14, 2022. The appetite stimulant was ordered on April 10, 2022. Consequently, Resident 62 lost 26 pounds during that time. 2. Residents 13 and 62, who were on a fortified diet (diet to increase calories for residents who need to maintain or gain weight) were given fortified cereal for breakfast and fortified mashed potatoes for lunch and dinner daily. These foods were in addition to the foods that were already on the menu. Multiple observations indicated Residents 13 and 62 were not consuming the extra fortified foods provided. This intervention was intended to add additional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound care dressings were labeled in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure for four of five residents (Residents 61, 693, 53, 490) reviewed for pressure injury (or pressure ulcers- wounds that happen on areas of the skin that are under pressure). This failure had the potential for inconsistent care coordination, and for Resident's 61, 693, 53, 490, not to receive the optimal care they need, which would hinder the healing of their pressure injuries. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 61's admission Record (clinical record with demographic information), on June 7, 2022, at 10:00 AM, the admission Record indicated Resident 61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (elevated sugar levels in the blood), hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (elevated blood pressure), pressure ulcer of sacral (tail bone) region stage three (the sore gets worse and extends…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$7,446 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $7,446 — penalty dated 2023-08-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA