Courtyard Care Center
340 Northlake Drive, San Jose, CA 95117 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 76 certified beds · (408) 249-0344 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.9% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.9% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.8% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.4% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.8% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.1% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.4% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.6% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.4% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.02 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.24 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 82 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 71.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.1%CMS range 29.3–50.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 7.7–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 71.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 68.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 65.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 2.8–10.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.24 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 72.4 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.38 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2022-01-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its own policy and procedure to evaluate residents' fall risk, to investigate the fall, to implement resident centered care plan, to revise the fall care plan and/or place the effective interventions to prevent four of 17 sampled residents (Residents 1, 24, 37 and 38) from multiple falls recurring when: 1. For Resident 1, the facility did not revise the fall care plan, did not implement fall care plan intervention or evaluate the resident's fall risk. Resident 1 had eight (8) unwitnessed falls from 5/21/2020 to 1/25/2022. 2. For Resident 24, the facility did not revise the fall care plan, did not implement fall care plan intervention or evaluate the resident's fall risk. Resident 24 had four (4) unwitnessed falls from 9/11/2021 to 1/8/2022. 3. For Resident 37, staff failed implement the fall care plan intervention to provide dycem (non-slip mat) on his wheelchair, which had resulted in Resident 37 sliding on his wheelchair and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans to address a resident to resident altercation, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure had the potential to result in the resident not receiving the interventions necessary to maintain their highest level of well-being.Findings:Review of Resident 3's clinical record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage (brain damage caused by lack of oxygen), alcohol dependence, anxiety disorder (a disorder that causes people to feel panicked for long periods of time), and type II diabetes mellitus (a disorder that causes elevated blood sugar levels).Review of Resident 3's minimum data set (MDS, a required assessment for all skilled nursing facility residents to get reimbursed by Medicare) Section C-Cognitive Patterns indicated Resident 3 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS, a score to evaluate cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one out of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), when there were multiple days for which there was no evidence of documentation of resident behavioral charting after a staff-to-resident incident. This failure had the potential to compromise the resident's health, safety, and overall well-beingFindings:Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (also known as a stroke, an attack in the brain caused by lack of blood flow), mood disorder, and major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms (a mental disorder that affects mood).Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated on 8/29/25, Resident 1 had an altercation with a certified nurse assistant (CNA). Resident 1 had called his daughter after a CNA had cared for him, and said the CNA had push him. Resident 1's daughter called adult protective services (APS), and the police were called.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop care plans for one of four sampled residents (Residents 1) when the facility failed to create a baseline fall care plan (Care plans identify the specific cares and services necessary to meet the residents' needs). Failure to develop care plans had the potential to result in the residents not receiving interventions needed to maintain their health and safety at the highest practicable level. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (when blood sugar is too high), end stage renal disease (condition which the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids), muscle weakness, osteoarthritis (when flexible tissue at the ends of the bones wears down). Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 1's score was 15, meaning Resident 1 was high risk for fall. A review of Resident 1's care plan did not address his risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-31 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Long Term Care Ombudsman (Ombudsman, an advocate for residents in the nursing homes) was notified in writing of a transfer for 82 transfers/discharges. This failure had the potential of not providing 71 residents and/or their responsible party (RP, a person who is accountable for making decisions on behalf of the resident) with access to an advocate who could inform them of their rights and from being inappropriately transferred. Findings: During a review of Residents 11 and 58's electronic health records regarding their transfers to an acute care hospital, on several occasions, a transfer notification form, that is to be sent to the Ombudsman, was not located. During an interview with the social services director (SSD), on 1/31/25 at 10:22 a.m., the SSD stated the facility do not have any notification forms to the Ombudsman for Residents 11 or 58. The SSD stated the facility did not have an Ombudsman since May of 2024 and did not notify the Ombudsman office of any transfers/discharges, since May of 2024. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate pharmaceutical services when: 1. Two medications, glipizide and duloxetine, were not available for two out of seven residents (Residents 224 and 55) 2. There were discrepancies between the controlled drug (those with high potential for abuse and addiction record (CDR, an inventory/accountability sheet) and the medication administration record (MAR) for four out of four residents (Residents 224, 32, 1 and 2) These failures had the potential to affect the health of residents and resulted in the facility not having accurate accountability of controlled medications which had the potential for misuse or diversion. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 1/28/25 at 4:41 p.m., LVN F stated she did not have glipizide (medication that lowers blood sugar) 5 milligram (mg, unit of measurement) in the medication cart for Resident 224, and that she would have to call the pharmacy to get it stocked. A review of Resident 224's physician orders, dated 10/29/24, indicated Resident 224 was to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-31 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility had a facility medication error rate of 7.7% when four errors out of 52 opportunities during the medication administration for four out of six residents (Residents 12, 224, 55 and 2). This failure resulted in medication not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders which had the potential for residents not receiving the full therapeutic effects of the medications. Findings: 1. During a concurrent medication pass observation and interview on 1/27/25 at 12:31 p.m., with LVN E, LVN E administered three units (standard measurement) of insulin aspart (a type of insulin injection to lower blood sugar level) to Resident 12 with a pen injector (an injector that uses a dial to administer the correct medication dosage). Prior to administering the 3 units, LVN E did not prime (process of filling the tubing) the pen injector needle with two units. LVN E stated I would usually prime the needle with 2 units. Review of UpToDate: Lexidrug (a drug reference for healthcare professionals) indicated for insulin aspart administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were maintained for food storage according to standards of practice and facility policy when: 1. There were expired food items; 2. Cookware was not properly dried; 3. The temperature log book for the refrigerator used to store food for residents was incomplete. These deficient practices potentially exposed 65 residents, who received food from the kitchen to food-borne illnesses. Findings: 1. During the initial tour of the facility's kitchen on 1/27/25 at 8:32 a.m., with the dietary aide, (DA), the following were observed: a. Gelatin in refrigerator R3 which had an expiration date of 1/26/25. b. Refrigerator R2 had Ground beef which had an expiration date of 1/26/25. c. Freezer F1 had a bag of 4 buns with a date of 12/16/24. d. One pie crust had dates of 12/16/24 and use by 1/16/24. 2. During an observation and subsequent interview, with the dietary manager (DM), on 1/29/25 at 10:51 a.m., there were seven large metal sheet pans which were stacked wet on storage rack. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were implemented when: 1. Staff did not label resident wash basins kept in shared bathrooms with the residents' identifiers; 2. Staff did not wear the proper personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering a room under enhanced droplet precautions; 3. Staff did not label oxygen tubing for one resident (Resident 21); 4. Staff did not ensure the dressing around a gastrostomy tube (GT, a thin, flexible tube inserted through the stomach to deliver nutrients or medications) was intact and correct infection precaution was followed for one resident (Resident 7); and 5. A urinary catheter (a device that drains urine) bag was found touching the floor, for one resident (Resident 38). These failures had the potential to compromise resident's health and safety, and potentially lead to the spread of communicable illnesses. Findings: 1. During an observation on 1/27/25 at 8:52 a.m., two unlabeled wash basins were seen in the shared bathroom of resident room AA. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of risks and benefits of treatment for four (Resident 23, Resident 34, Resident 70, and Resident 174) out of 16 sampled residents when: 1. Resident 23's psychotropic medication (drugs that affect the brain, mood, thoughts, or behavior) informed consent was not completed and verified; 2. Resident 70' psychotropic medication informed consent was not completed and verified; 3. Resident 34's responsible party was not notified in a timely manner about the results of a chest X-ray (digital image of internal composition of the body); and 4. Resident 174's psychotropic medication informed consent was not completed and verified. These failures had the potential to put residents at risk for misidentifying and not reporting possible side effects and adverse reactions that can be detrimental to their health due to lack of knowledge about their psychotropic medications, as well as putting Resident 34 RPs not informed of his current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for an advance directive (AD, a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney that authorizes another person to act on behalf of the resident) and completion of the Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a document that specifies the medical treatments the residents wants to receive during serious illness) form for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 23). These failures had the potential to lead to the delivery of unnecessary or inappropriate medical services against residents' goals and wishes. Findings: Review of Resident 23's admission record indicated Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 23's POLST form dated 1/20/24 indicated section D for AD was marked for Advance Directive, Healthcare Agent if named in Advance Directive field was empty. Further review of Resident 23's clinical record indicated there was no documented copy of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and develop a comprehensive care plan for one of 18 residents (Resident 67), when Resident 67's dementia (a general term for a group of brain disorders that cause a decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and problem-solving) diagnosis was not addressed. This failure had the potential to result in the inability to identify the residents' individualized care issues and implement person-centered care. Findings: During a review of Resident 67's care plans, in his electronic health record, a care plan regarding his dementia was not found. During an interview with the facility's nurse consultant (NC) on 1/29/25 at 8:43 a.m., the NC stated Resident 67 should have a specific cognitive care plan. The NC acknowledged Resident 67 did not have a dementia care plan. During a review of the facility's policy, titled Dementia Care, revised 12/19/2022, the policy indicated .3. The care plan interventions will be related to each resident's individual symptomology and rate of dementia (or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure needed care and services were provided in accordance with the resident's goals for care for one resident (Resident 38) out of six sampled residents, when Resident 38's physician's order for interaction was not followed. This failure had the potential to put Resident 38 at risk for decline in physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/27/25 at 8:55 a.m. with Resident 38, Resident 38 was lying in bed, awake, alert and oriented. Resident 38 stated I'm trying to get counseling for emotional situation. I get very irritable at people and I scream. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/30/25 at 10:55 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) A, Resident 38 was lying in his bed. LVN A stated that Resident 38 was not in a wheelchair this morning. LVN A also stated that she never saw Resident 38 in a wheelchair even when Resident 38 was in a different station. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/31/25 at 9:23 a.m. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving dialysis (removal of waste and excess fluid from the body) treatment received consistent care with professional standards for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 32) when their dialysis communication sheets (DCS) were missing for several treatment days. This failure had the potential for Resident 32's dialysis care not being properly communicated and putting Resident 32 at risk for complications. Findings: Review of Resident 32's clinical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident (CVA, also known as stroke, a brain disorder caused by lack of blood flow to the brain), and end-stage renal disease (when the kidneys no longer function to remove waste from the blood). Review of Resident 32's clinical record further indicated Resident 32 received dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Review of Resident 32's dialysis record indicated there were missing DCS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the consultant pharmacist (CP) failed to identify and report irregularities during the medication regimen review (MRR) for two (Resident 25 and Resident 174) out of 23 sampled residents when: 1. Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS, a rating scale that measures the severity of abnormal movements) was not done for Resident 25; and 2. AIMS was not done for Resident 174. This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary or prolonged use of the psychotropic medication, which could increase the resident's risk of experiencing side effects (undesirable effects from the medication). Findings: 1. A review of Resident 25's medical record indicated a diagnosis of but is not limited to Schizoaffective Disorder (chronic mental health condition in which people experience mood disorder, symptoms include hallucinations and/or delusions; feelings of intense sadness). A review of Resident 25's Physician Order dated 7/4/24 indicated, Seroquel Oral Tablet [antipsychotic medication] 300 mg [milligram, a unit of measurement]; give one tablet by mouth in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of 18 sampled residents (Residents 23, 25, 70 and 174) were free from unnecessary psychotropic (drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications when Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS, a rating scale designed to measure involuntary movements known as tardive dyskinesia [TD], a disorder that sometimes develops as a side effect of long-term treatment with antipsychotic medications) assessment was not done. The failure resulted in lack of adequate monitoring and unnecessary medications for the residents, which had the potential for increased risks associated with the use of psychotropic medications. Findings: 1a. A review of Resident 25's medical record indicated a diagnosis of but is not limited to Schizoaffective Disorder (chronic mental health condition in which people experience mood disorder, symptoms include hallucinations and/or delusions; feelings of intense sadness) A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's private medical information was protected against unauthorized disclosure for 1 of 3 residents, when Resident 1 was furnished with medications labeled with medical information relevant to Resident 2 and Resident 3 upon discharge from the facility. This failure resulted in Resident 2 and Resident 3's private information being disclosed to another resident without their permission. Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 1had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 (a score of 13 to 15 indicates cognitively intact). Review of Resident 1's social service progress note dated 12/19/23, indicated Resident 1 was accepted at another skilled nursing facility (SNF) and would discharge on [DATE]. Review of social service progress notes dated, 1/7/24, indicated Resident 1's friend (R1F) came to the facility to return medications given to Resident 1 upon her discharge that did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-06 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
During an observation 10/2/23 at 8:49 a.m., Residents 36, 43 and 56 were in their beds with quarter side rails up. Review for Resident 36's Bed Rails assessments lacked documented evidence that Resident 36 was assessed for bed rails safety between 4/27/21 and 10/2/23. Review for Resident 43's Bed Rails assessments lacked documented evidence that Resident 43 was assessed for bed rails safety between 4/29/21 and 10/2/23. Review for Resident 56's Bed Rails assessments lacked evidence that Resident 56 was assessed for bed rails safety. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess bed rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed) safety for 12 of 17 residents (Residents 6, 11, 12, 21, 26, 28, 36, 43, 46, 52, 54 and 56) periodically, according to their policy. This failure placed the residents at risk for entrapment and injury. Findings: During the initial tour of the facility conducted on 10/2/23, at 9:00 a.m., Residents 12, 52, and 54, all had quarter bed rails elevated. Review for Resident 12's Bed Rails assessments lacked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. A dented can of applesauce was stored on a the dry storage shelf. 2. An outdated bag of pinto beans was stored on a dry storage shelf. 3. Outdated onions were stored on a dry storage shelf; and, 4. Outdated ground herbs were stored on top of the kitchen condiment shelf. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness for residents who received food from the kitchen. Finding: 1. During a concurrent kitchen observation and interview with the Registered Dietician (RD) on 10/02/23 at 9:11 a.m., a dented can of unsweetened applesauce was on a shelf in the dry storage area intended for items to be consumed. The RD confirmed this observation and stated dented cans should be stored in an area designated for dented cans. Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Food Storage, revised 8/29/23, indicated, dented or bulging cans should be placed on Damaged Goods Shelf and returned for credits. 2. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B did not remove their gloves or perform hand hygiene after placing dirty laundry in a bin before taking a wheelchair into a room; and, 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) C did not clean a blood pressure (BP) cuff after obtaining vital signs for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 2, 46, 63, and 220) during medication pass. These failures increased the potential for the spread of communicable diseases among residents. Findings: 1. During an observation on 10/2/23 at 9:26 AM, CNA B, walked to the hallway from room [ROOM NUMBER] wearing gloves and carrying a full linen bag. CNA B placed the linen bag in the dirty linen bin and, without removing the gloves worn, took a clean wheelchair from the hallway into room [ROOM NUMBER]. During an interview with CNA B on 10/2/23 at 9:48 AM, he confirmed he took the wheelchair into room [ROOM NUMBER] without changing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a quarterly minimum data set (MDS, a resident clinical assessment tool) assessment in a timely manner for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 61). This failure resulted in Resident 61's MDS to not be reviewed timely. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/05/23 at 9:24 a.m. with the MDS Director (MDSD), Resident 61's MDS schedule was reviewed. The schedule indicated Resident 61's comprehensive MDS Assessment Reference Date (ARD) was 5/22/23; however, the quarterly MDS ARD was 9/14/23. The MDSD stated Resident 61's quarterly MDS assessment was not scheduled in a timely manner. Review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, MDS 3.0 Completion, dated 12/19/2022, indicated, Quarterly Assessment - completed using an ARD no >92 days from the most recent prior quarterly or comprehensive assessment (counting ARD to ARD).
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADL) were provided to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 46) when Resident 46's fingernails were unkept. This failure left the resident incompletely groomed. Findings: Review of Resident 46's clinical record indicated she had the diagnoses of dementia (conditions characterized by impairment of least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgement), and muscles weakness. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B in Resident 46's room on 10/4/23 at 9:06 a.m., resident's fingernails were long with black matter underneath the nails. CNA B confirmed this observation and stated the nails should be cleaned during ADL care. During an interview with Resident 46's responsible party (RP, person designated to make decisions on behalf of a resident) on 10/5/23 at 11:32 a.m., she stated she spoke with facility staff a month ago regarding Resident 46's nail care not being done. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain professional standards of practice for one of four sampled residents (Resident 28) when oxygen was not administered per a physician's order. This failure resulted in Resident 28 receiving oxygen at a higher setting than prescribed. Findings: During an observation 10/2/23 at 9:32 a.m. in Resident 28's room, the resident was observed receiving oxygen at 5 liters (L, a metric unit of volume) via nasal cannula (NC, a flexible tubing placed into the nostrils and connected to an oxygen source). During an interview and record review with licensed vocational nurse (LVN) G on 10/04/23 at 8:56 a.m., Resident 28's oxygen order, dated 1/27/23, indicated 2 L via NC as needed for shortness of breath. LVN G confirmed Resident 28 was on 5 L oxygen, while the physician's order for 2 L oxygen was not followed. During an interview with the director of nursing (DON) on 10/6/23 at 1:46 p.m., she stated nursing staff should follow physicians' orders when administering medications or oxygen. Review of the facility's policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications from one of three emergency kits (e-kits) were locked and replaced after use. This failure had the potential to result in medications not being available during emergency situations. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview in the medication storage room with Registered Nurse (RN) D on 10/2/23 at 11:02 a.m., the e-kit containing injectable medications (administered with a needle and syringe) was found unlocked. RN D stated e-kits should be locked and restocked within 24 to 48 hours, so medications are available for residents. During concurrent interview and record review with RN D on 10/2/23 at 11:02 a.m., the e-kit pharmacy log indicated Ertapenem, an intravenous (within a vein) antibiotic used to treat infections, was removed 9/18/23. RN D confirmed the e-kit was open at that time but not relocked or restocked. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/4/23 at 3:40 p.m., she confirmed the e-kit should be locked and replaced. Review of the facility's policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 5.13% (percent, a specified amount of units for every hundred units) medication error rate when two medication errors out of 39 opportunities were identified during medication pass for two of ten residents (Resident 2 and Resident 220). These failures had the potential to result in ineffective drug therapy. Findings: Review of Resident 2's clinical record. An Order Summary Report, dated 10/4/23, indicated Lidocaine External Patch 4% (Lidocaine patches are generally used to help relieve pain) Apply to generalized painful areas topically (on the skin) one time a day for generalized pain. Apply to the area resident requests. Start date 2/22/23. Teview of Resident 220's clinical record titled, Order Summary Report, dated 10/4/23, indicated, Propranolol HCL (Propranolol HCL, medication used to treat high blood pressure) oral tablet 10 mg (milligrams, a unit of measure)(BP -the pressure of circulating blood against the walls of blood vessels) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for HTN (hypertension - elevated blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their policy for medication self-administration for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 25) when Resident 25 had medications on her bedside table without an IDT (interdisciplinary team, composed of a group of healthcare staff from various disciplines who work together to discuss care for individual residents) evaluation allowing for it. This failure left medications accessible to a resident, who lacked an evaluation for whether such medications should be left at her bedside. Findings: During an observation on 10/3/23 at 9:40 a.m., there was a bottle of Pepto-Bismol and Ibuprofen 200 mg tablets on the bedside table of Resident 25. During a concurrent interview with Resident 25, Resident 25 stated, I take the medication when needed, but not often. During an observation on 10/5/23 at 8:19 a.m., there was an albuterol inhaler (inhalable medication used to improve breathing) on the bedside table of Resident 25. During a concurrent interview with Resident 25, she stated she sent home the Pepto-Bismol and Ibuprofen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer the correct pneumococcal vaccine (vaccine to prevent bacterial pneumonia [infection of the lungs]) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 25) per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s pneumococcal vaccine schedule guidelines. This failure resulted in Resident 25 receiving an additional unnecessary pneumococcal vaccine. Findings: Review of Resident 25's facesheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance, including contact details and a brief medical history), indicated Resident 25's date of birth was 8/5/1956, and she was admitted on [DATE]. During a concurrent interview and record review with the director of staff development (DSD)/interim infection preventionist (IIP) on 10/05/23 at 01:57 p.m., Resident 25's Immunization Report, dated 10/5/23, indicated Resident 25 received pneumovax 23 (PPSV23, a type of pneumococcal vaccine) on 3/27/17 and 4/7/23. The DSD/IIP stated, per CDC new pneumococcal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-01-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. Food service equipment was stored wet, and 2. The floor below the dish machine was not smooth and cleanable. These failures had the potential to cause the growth of microorganisms or attract pests which could cause foodborne illness or cross-contaminate food (cross-contamination occurs when unclean surfaces or utensils spread germs to food and can potentially cause foodborne illness) for the 68 residents eating at the facility. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 1/24/22 starting at 8:55 a.m., the following was found on a storage rack in the middle of the kitchen: Three four-quart plastic containers were wet inside and stacked together, one twelve-quart plastic container was wet inside and stacked with other similar containers, one large plastic bowl was wet inside and stacked with similar items, and five metal pans were wet inside and stacked together.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to routinely assess the arteriovenous fistula (AV fistula, a connection surgically made between an artery and a vein for dialysis access) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 22) who received dialysis (a procedure in which a machine filters wastes and fluid from the blood). This failure had the potential to result in unidentified complications with Resident 22's AV fistula. Findings: Review of Resident 22's medical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and had the diagnosis of end stage renal disease (ESRD, the kidneys no longer function as they should to meet the body's needs). The medical record further indicated Resident 22 received dialysis every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Review of Resident 22's Order Summary Report indicated she had a physician's order dated 10/30/2021, to check dialysis site for bleeding, redness and tenderness every shift. She also had a physician's order dated 10/29/2021, to auscultate bruit (use a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident when: 1. The facility did not reorder two out of 12 emergency medication kits (E-kits) after using them; and 2. The facility failed to ensure controlled medications (medications regulated by the government because they may be abused or cause addiction) for four out of six residents (Residents 31, 371, 20 and 66) were accounted for. Failure to reorder the E-kits had the potential to result in medications not being available to the residents when needed. Failure to account for controlled medications had the potential to result in diversion (transfer for illicit use) of the medications. Findings: 1. During an observation on 1/24/2022 at 10:12 a.m., one E-kit containing narcotic medications (medications that dull the senses and have the potential to cause addiction) was inspected. The medication list on the outside of the E-kit indicated there were supposed to be eight tablets of Dilaudid (pain medication) 2 milligrams (mg, unit of dose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-31 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a well-balanced diet that met nutrition needs when serving sizes on the meal tray tickets did not match the planned and approved menu for Regular diets, Regular Puree diets (texture modified diets that do not require chewing), Carbohydrate Controlled (CCHO, therapeutic diets designed for people with diabetes to keep the carbohydrate levels in meals evenly spaced throughout the day), Mechanical Soft diets (texture modified diets that require less chewing than regular diets), and Renal 80 gram (therapeutic diet that is low in sodium, phosphorus, and protein for people with kidney disease) CCHO Mechanical Soft diets. This failure had the potential to result in not meeting the nutritional needs thus further compromising the medical status of 32 out of 68 residents eating in the facility. Findings: Review of facility document titled Winter Menu (spreadsheet), dated 12/27/21 - 2/27/22, indicated for 1/24/22 Monday Lunch, the serving sizes for the Regular diet were: one Beef…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-31 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — patternReport COVID19 data to residents and families.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify all residents, their representatives, and families of a confirmed case of COVID-19 in the facility in a timely manner, when the communication was not sent for five days after a positive COVID-19 case was identified in the facility. This failure could potentially cause a spread of COVID-19 in the facility and is in violation of federal regulations to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 virus. Findings: During an interview on 1/28/22 at 2:14 p.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP), IP stated she had first learned of a resident having a positive COVID-19 test on 1/8/22. During an interview on 1/31/22 at 9:10 a.m. with the administrator (ADM), ADM stated he used text them all service to notify families. ADM stated this was done on 1/13/22. ADM stated he was first aware of a positive COVID-19 case on 1/8/22. During a review of the facility's Mitigation Plan, it indicated, .Facilities must inform residents and their representatives by 5:00 PM the day after an occurrence of a single confirmed infection of COVID-19, or three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-31 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN, notice that transfers potential financial liability) to one of three residents (Resident 30). This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 30's right to appeal (apply for reversal of) the facility's decision to discontinue Medicare Part A services (skilled treatments paid by Medicare). This failure also had the potential to result in Resident 30 not being informed of his payment responsibilities to the facility after Medicare Part A services ended. Findings: Review of Resident 30's medical record indicated he was admitted to the facility under Medicare Part A on 7/28/2021. The medical record further indicated Resident 30 came off Medicare Part A services on 8/3/2021, but continued living in the facility. Review of Resident 30's SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review, filled out by the facility on 1/27/2022, indicated the facility initiated Resident 30's discharge from Medicare Part A services when benefit days were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its own policy and procedure to report the allegations of resident-to-resident verbal abuse of two encounters, for two (Resident 4 and Resident 44) of 17 sampled residents to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), the ombudsman and law enforcement immediately, but not later than 2 hours when: 1. Resident 4 was involved in an altercation on 7/29/21 at 6:00 p.m., 2. Resident 44 was involved in an altercation on 7/29/21 at 6:00 p.m. and 8/21/21 at noon. This failure had the potential to result in delay of investigation and the reporting of further allegations of abuse. 1. Review of Resident 4's admission record indicated Resident 4 was admitted with multiple diagnoses including cerebral infarction (a condition resulting from a lack of oxygen in the brain potentially causing a loss of sensory and motor function), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness such as mild loss of strength in a leg, arm, or face),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-31 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one of six residents (Resident 19) and/or the resident's representative regarding the facility's policy for the bed hold when they were transferred to the hospital without receiving notice. This failure has the potential to violate the resident's right to allow the resident to return to the facility. Findings: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses included a history of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA, similar to a stroke, but only lasts for a short duration), and cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain, causing part of the brain to die off), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, disease which causes airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), and dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning). Review of Resident 19's electronic record (eRecord) indicated Resident 19 had a hospital leave which started on 9/25/21 and she had returned on 9/29/21. During an interview on 1/28/22 at 9:44 a.m. with the director of nursing (DON), DON stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-31 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 1) and one resident (Resident 68). Failure to accurately assess had the potential to compromise the facility's ability to develop and implement resident-centered care plans and interventions. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 1's Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR, a tool used to communicate information to the doctor) Communication Form and Progress Notes indicated she fell in the facility on 9/4/2020, 1/22/2021 and 3/12/2021. Resident 1's MDS, dated [DATE] and 4/17/2021 were reviewed. Section J1800 asked the question, Has the resident had any falls since admission/entry or reentry or the prior assessment? The answer to this question was coded 0 to indicate Resident 1 did not have any falls during the specified time frames. Resident 1's falls on 9/4/2020, 1/22/2021 and 3/12/2021 were not coded on the MDS. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and security for one of three residents (Resident 47) when facility staff was unaware Resident 47 wandered away outside the facility for several hours. This failure compromised the resident's safety and put her at high risk for injury. Findings: During record review of Resident 47's clinical record, Resident 47 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included dementia (memory loss), diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar) and osteoporosis (a condition in which bones become weak and brittle). Review of Resident 47's minimum data set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 12/08/21, indicated Resident 47 was severely cognitively impaired and required supervision during activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of Resident 47's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident 47 was at risk for elopement. During interview with licensed vocational nurse (LVN E) on 01/28/22 at 1:30 p.m., LVN E stated he was not aware…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address whether one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 1) would benefit from gradual dose reduction (GDR, stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if conditions can be managed by a lower dose or if the medication can be discontinued altogether) of a psychotropic medication (medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions and behavior). This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary or prolonged use of the psychotropic medication, which could increase the resident's risk of experiencing side effects (undesirable effects from the medication). Findings: Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and had the diagnosis of dementia (mental disorder caused by brain disease or injury) and psychosis (a severe mental disorder in which thought and emotions are so impaired that contact is lost with external reality). Review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report indicated she had a physician's order, dated 7/21/2021, for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 17 sampled residents (Residents 43, 38 and 47) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (medications capable of affecting the mind, emotions and behavior) when: 1. For Resident 43, the facility did not identify and monitor target behaviors (specific behaviors intended to be reduced or eliminated by the medication), did not monitor side effects (undesirable effects from the medication), and did not identify appropriate indications for the use of psychotropic medications; 2. For Resident 38, the facility did not identify and monitor target behaviors for psychotropic medications; and 3. For Resident 47, the facility did not identify and monitor target behaviors for psychotropic medications. These failures compromised the facility's ability to determine whether or not the psychotropic medications were effective. These failures also increased the residents' risk of experiencing harmful effects from the psychotropic medications.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-31 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consents to either receive or refuse pneumonia vaccine for one of five residents (Resident 23). This failure put the resident at risk of not being informed of the risks and benefits of the pneumonia vaccines, and not giving them the ability to make an informed decision. Findings: Review of Resident 23's electronic record (eRecord) for vaccine status, the eRecord indicated a consent was needed for pneumovax (a pneumonia vaccine). Neither a consent nor refusal was located by the surveyor. During an interview on 1/28/22 at 10:21 a.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP), IP stated she had not found a consent to accept or refuse the pneumovax vaccine for Resident 23. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Pneumococcal Vaccination, revised 05/2009, the P&P indicated, .1. Upon admission the resident will be assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine, and when indicated, provided the vaccination within sixty (60) days of admission to the facility unless medically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-31 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the failed to maintain comfortable and sanitary shared bathroom for one of three residents, when there was a black matter and long, narrow piece of black material that was sticky on one side in the bathroom tile surfaces. Also, the two tissue holder beside the toilet had no rollers. This had the potential to affect resident's psychosocial well-being. Findings: During observation on 01/26/22 at 10:15 a.m., in the bathroom commonly shared by Residents 9, 53 and 55, there was a black matter and long, narrow piece of black material that was sticky on one side in the bathroom tile surfaces. The door was hard to open because it was stuck. Also, the two tissue holder had no rollers beside the toilet. During an interview with Resident 55 on 01/26/22 at 10:30 a.m., Resident 55 stated it felt awful to look it that way. Resident 55 stated that housekeepers did not clean daily. During an interview with registered nurse F (RN F) on 01/26/22 at 10:35 a.m., RN F acknowledged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COURTYARD POST ACUTE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/16/2022 |
| JOHNSON, FRANK | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/11/2021 |
| DEHGHANMANESH, ADRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| JOHNSON, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/11/2021 |
| KIRCHNER, RUTH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/04/2025 |
| KOCHEK, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| OXFORD, MICHEAL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/03/2022 |
| SALAMA, YOUSUF | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/03/2025 |
| SMV SAN JOSE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2005 |
| SUN MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/22/2021 |
| FARRALES, MARY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| FREDERICK, MELISSA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/21/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $640K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555635. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.