Sunset Manor Conv Hosp
2720 Nevada Avenue, El Monte, CA 91733 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 81 certified beds · (626) 443-9425 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 35.1% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.6% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.5% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.4% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.4% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.7% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.82 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.47 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 64 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 63.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.9%CMS range 24.7–57.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 8.5–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 63.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 65.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.9%CMS range 5.2–12.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.43 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 73.2 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.48 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.66 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment as indicated in the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) titled, Preventive Maintenance Program, and Safe and Homelike Environment, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: 1. Ensure the Maintenance Director (TMD) had a schedule of maintenance services for Resident 1's bed remote control coil line (coiled remote-control cord). 2. Ensure Certified Nurse Assistant 2 (CNA 2) prevented Resident 1 from grabbing onto Resident 1's damaged/broken bed remote control coil hanging on Resident 1's right bed side rail (an adjustable bar attached to a bed to help patients/residents move around) during care. As a result, on 12/17/2024 at 5 am, Resident 1 sustained a laceration (a wound when skin, tissue, and/or muscle was torn or cut open) on Resident 1's inner right hand between the thumb and index finger (also known as the pointer finger, or first finger) measuring 2 centimeters (cm-unit of measurement) in length, by 0.2 cm in width and by 0.2 in depth. Resident 1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for two of two sampled residents (Residents 1 and 48) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response. These failures had the potential to delay meeting Residents 1 and 48's needs and placed the residents at risk for fall or accident/injury. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 3/28/2026 with diagnoses that included muscle wasting and atrophy, other abnormalities of gait (a person's manner of walking and mobility (the ability to move) and schizophrenia (a mental illness characterized by disturbances in thought). During a review of Resident 1's Fall Risk Assessment (FRA- method of assessing a patient's likelihood of falling) dated 3/28/2026, the FRA indicated Resident 1 was assessed as high risk for falls due to Resident 1 having intermittent confusion,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure policies and procedures (P&P) on Advance Directive (AD, a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) were implemented for two of two sampled residents (Residents 12 and 64) by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 12's Advance Healthcare Directive Acknowledgement Form (ADAF-form that indicated a resident or resident's representative were informed of their rights regarding medical treatments, Advance Directive formulation, and whether an AD was created) was not missing information and completely filled out. b. Ensure Resident 64's copy of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a form that contains written medical orders for healthcare professionals regarding specific medical treatments that can or cannot be done at the end of life) and AD acknowledgement form were in Resident 64's binder and/or uploaded in Resident 64's electronic medical record (EMR). These failures had the potential for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent unnecessary use of psychotropic medications (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) according to the facility's policy and procedure and the resident's care plan for two of five sampled residents (Residents 1 and 73) by failing to: a. Ensure the adverse side effects (unwanted or harmful effect) was monitored for the use of Divalproex ( mood stabilizer or treatment of seizures ), Clozapine (antianxiety medication to treat anxiety [group of mental disorders characterized by feelings of anxiety [an unpleasant state of inner turmoil] and fear]), Olanzapine (antipsychotic medication to treat mental disorder) oral tablet 5 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) and Trazodone (antidepressant - medication to treat depression [mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest]) for Resident 1. b. Ensure Resident 73's Duloxetine antidepressant use included specific target behavior for use. These…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a specific and individualized resident-centered care plan to meet the residents' needs for two of two sampled residents (Residents 14 and 26) by failing to:a. Develop a care plan for Resident 14 who was on enhanced barrier precaution (EBP, infection control measures to prevent the spread of multidrug resistant organisms [MDRO]). b. Develop a care plan for Resident 26 for the use of antibiotic therapy (medications used to treat and prevent infections caused by bacteria). These failures had the potential for Residents 14 and 26 not to receive necessary care, treatment, and services to address the residents' specific needs. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 14's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 14 on 3/1/2026 with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD- a condition in which the kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis) and dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the resident's care plan for one of one sampled resident (Resident 73) to reflect Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia (PJP, life-threatening fungal lung infection) prophylaxis in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) on comprehensive care plan. This failure had the potential to not provide Resident 73 with necessary care and services and compromise Resident 73's safety. Findings: During a review of Resident 73's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 73 on 2/6/2026 with diagnoses including respiratory failure (a condition when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood) and depression (persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During a review of Resident 73's untitled Care Plan (CP) initiated on 2/6/2026, the CP indicated Resident 73 was on antibiotic therapy of Bactrim Double Strength (antibiotic used to kill bacteria causing infections) Oral tablet 800 to 160 milligram (mg, unit of measurement) related to encephalitis (swelling or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure non-English speaking (refers to an individual who cannot speak or understand or have difficulty speaking or understanding the English language) residents were provided with a communication board/device in a language that the resident understood for one of one sampled resident (Resident 2). This failure had the potential to affect Resident 2's communication with staff resulting in delay in the provision of care, treatment and service to Resident 2.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 2/6/2026 with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, or unease) and history of falling. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 5/7/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 2's preferred language was Cantonese. The MDS indicated Resident 2 had severely impaired cognition (ability to understand and process information) for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Foley Catheter (FC, a thin, flexible, rubber or plastic tube used to drain urine from the bladder) was secured on the resident's thigh in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) Indwelling Catheter Use and Removal, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 27). This failure had the potential to result in catheter-related complications for Resident 27.Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 27 on 5/4/2026 with diagnoses including obstructive and reflux uropathy (disorder of the urinary tract that occurs due to obstructed urinary flow and can be either structural or functional) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, a noncancerous enlargement of the prostate gland). During a review of Resident 27's untitled Care Plan (CP) initiated on 5/5/2026, the CP indicated Resident 27 had an indwelling catheter related to obstructive and reflux uropathy due to BPH. The CP intervention indicated for nursing staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents on oxygen therapy (treatment that provides supplemental, or extra oxygen) had an oxygen in use warning sign posted outside the room for one of one sampled resident (Resident 26). This failure placed Resident 26, facility staff and visitors at risk of the dangers of accidental fire and injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 26's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 26 on 4/13/2026 with diagnoses including pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and heart failure (HF, a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump blood efficiently). During a review of Resident 26's untitled Care Plan (CP) initiated on 4/24/2026, the CP indicated Resident 26 had altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing. The CP goals included Resident 26 would not have complications related to shortness of breath and signs and symptoms of poor oxygen absorption. During a review of Resident 26's Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its Policy and Procedure (P&P) on the use of bed rails/siderails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars attached to the bed) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 64). This failure placed Resident 64 at risk for entrapment and injury from the use of bed rails.Findings: During a review of Resident 64's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 64 on 4/11/2026 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints caused by a gradual loss of cartilage) and right knee joint replacement surgery (removal of damaged bone and cartilage in a joint and replaced with durable artificial implants). During a review of Resident 64's Bed Rails Assessment (BRA) dated 4/11/2026, the BRA indicated Resident 64 did not need the use of bed rails. During a review of Resident 64's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 4/15/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 64 had moderately impaired cognition (ability to understand and process information). The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep one of two laundry dryers in a safe, operating, and sanitary condition for residents. This failure had the potential to result in spread of infection and posed as potential fire hazard. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/21/2026 at 12:40 pm with Housekeeping 1 (HKP 1) in the facility's laundry room, there were two dryers (container to put wet laundry for drying) in the facility's laundry room. One dryer had multiple random thick patches of light brown material on the dryer lint trap. HKP 1 stated HKP 1 did not monitor, sign and complete the Dryer Lint Clean Out Schedule Form because it was unreadable. HKP 1 stated the dryer lint trap needed to be cleaned every 2 hours to avoid potential fire. During a concurrent interview on 5/21/2026 at 12:42 pm with Housekeeping Supervisor (HKP Sup) and record review of the Dryer Lint Clean Out Schedule Form, the HKP Sup stated the dryer lint trap was thick and lint has accumulated. The HKP Sup stated the dryer lint trap should have been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to ensure Resident 1 did not have clutter around Resident 1's bed. This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at risk for falls and injuries from excessive clutter surrounding Resident 1's bed.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included COPD (Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions characterized by excessive and persistent worry, fear, and nervousness that can interfere with daily functioning), and depression (a persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities, and low energy, severely impacting daily life). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P, physician's clinical evaluation and examination of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) received mail and other packages within 24 hours of delivery.This deficient practice violated Resident 1's right to receive mail promptly (delivery of mail or other materials to the resident within 24 hours of delivery) and had the potential to impact Resident 1's well-being.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to facility on 4/25/2025 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), acute pulmonary edema (rapid accumulation of fluid in the lungs) and anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by excessive worry and fear that interferes with daily life). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P) dated 8/13/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 10/31/2025, the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff implemented person-centered care plan (a treatment plan that focused on the needs and preferences of a resident or individual) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) by failing to monitor Resident 2's symptoms of increased confusion/physical abusive towards staff. These deficient practices had the potential to place Resident 2 at risk of not receiving the individualized care services to attain or maintain highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 2 was admitted to facility on 2/17/2025 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness) following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (bleeding within the brain, most commonly due to high blood pressure, trauma, or other blood vessel issues) affecting left non-dominant side, acute kidney failure (rapid loss of kidney function,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the licensed nurse implemented the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Medication Orders by failing to indicate the severity of the pain level for the pain medication order for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk of not receiving the optimal therapeutic effect (desirable and beneficial effects resulting from a medical treatment) of the medication, which had the potential to impair Resident 1's wellbeing.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to facility on 8/15/2025 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (total paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) following cerebral infarction (as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels) affecting left non-dominant side, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled residents (Resident 30, 31 and 34) and/or their representatives were provided information regarding the right to formulate an advance directive (AD, legal documents that provide instructions for medical care and only go into effect if the person cannot communicate his/her own wishes) when: a. Resident 34 did not receive information regarding AD. b. Resident 30's AD Acknowledgement Form was filled out inaccurately. c. Resident 31's AD Acknowledgement Form was filled out inaccurately. These failures had the potential to result in Residents 30, 31, and 34 and/or their representatives to not be informed of their rights and receive unwanted and/or unnecessary life-sustaining care and treatment. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 34's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 34 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (elevated blood sugars), cirrhosis of the liver…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure irregularities identified from the monthly drug regimen review reported by the facility's pharmacist were acted upon for two of five sampled residents (Residents 20 and 34): a. Resident 34's pharmacist recommendation to order laboratory test to monitor the increased risk of rhabdomyolysis (a serious medical condition of a breakdown of muscle tissue, releasing harmful substances into the bloodstream) was not acted upon. b. Resident 20's pharmacist recommendation to discontinue Benadryl (medication to treat pain and itching) was not acted upon. These deficient practices had the potential for unnecessary medication administration. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 34's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 34 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes (elevated blood sugar), cirrhosis of the liver (liver damage replaced by scar tissue) and dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment for people…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were maintained in one of one facility kitchen. During initial tour of the kitchen, a 22-ounce (oz) bottle of basil pesto sauce was observed with an unreadable best by or used by date. This deficient practice had the potential for improper food storage, which could lead to foodborne illnesses (illness caused by consuming contaminated food or beverages) to the residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: During an initial tour and observation of the kitchen on 3/18/2025 at 8:58 am with the Assistant [NAME] (AC), a 22 oz. bottle of pesto sauce was observed inside the facility's freezer. The AC stated the pesto sauce bottle's use by or best by date was unreadable. The AC stated best by or used by dates were important to determine when the product was edible for consumption and when to discard to prevent possible food borne illnesses to the residents. During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Date Marking for Food Safety, revised 1/31/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light (an alerting device for nurses or other nursing personnel to assist a patient when in need) was within reach for one of one sampled resident (Resident 55). This failure had the potential to result in resident not receiving assistance in a timely manner when needed. Findings: During a review of Resident 55's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control) and tinea unguium (a fungal infection of the nails) During a review of Resident 55's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 3/7/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 55 had clear speech, usually understood others and usually made self-understood. Resident 55 required substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort, helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an effective communication method to one of two non-English speaking sampled residents (Resident 7). This failure had the potential for the resident not to receive necessary care and services. Findings: During a review of the Resident 7's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control) dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and pressure-induced deep tissue damage of the right heel (pressure ulcer/injury, PU/PI, localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence). During a review of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 7's preferred language was Vietnamese. The MDS indicated Resident 7 had no speech, rarely/never understood others and made self-understood. The MDS indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order to keep the resident's both heels to free float (technique where the heels were completely elevated off the surface) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 7). This failure had the potential risk for Resident 7 to develop pressure injury (PI, localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) and delayed healing of existing PI. Findings: During a review of the Resident 7's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control) dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and pressure-induced deep tissue damage of the right heel (pressure ulcer/injury, PU/PI, localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence). During a review of Resident 7's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 2/4/2025, the OSR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of one sampled resident (Resident 34), who required and received hemodialysis (treatment for kidney failure that removes waste and extra fluids from the blood) four times a week, by failing to ensure staff followed Resident 34's physician's order for fluid restrictions of 1200 milliliters (ml- unit of measurement) a day. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 34 to experience fluid overload (excessive amount of fluid in the body) and difficulty breathing that can compromise the Resident 34's health. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 34 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (elevated blood sugars), cirrhosis of the liver (liver damage where healthy cells are replaced by scar tissue), and dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment for people whose kidneys are failing). During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of three sampled residents (Resident 6) whose primary language was Spanish, the binding arbitration agreement (AA, a private process where disputing parties agree that one or several other individuals can plan about the dispute) was fully understood by the resident and was presented in a language Resident 6 understand. This deficient practice had the potential for the resident to not be fully informed and make an informed decision on whether to enter into such agreement. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate), hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and dependence on supplemental oxygen. During a review of Resident 6's History and Physical (H&P) dated 2/12/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 6 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Hand Hygiene, and Management of C. Difficile (a type of bacteria that can cause diarrhea) Infection, by failing to ensure staff washed their hands with soap and water after providing care for one of five sampled residents (Resident 2), who had C. Diff. This deficient practice had the potential to result in cross-contamination (the transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another) and the spread of infection throughout the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 2 on 10/3/2024 and recently readmitted Resident 2 on 12/28/24 with diagnoses of dysphagia following cerebral infarction (a swallowing disorder that may occur after a stroke), respiratory failure (a condition where there is not enough oxygen or too much carbon dioxide in the body), and pleural effusion (a condition in which fluid builds up in the space between the lung and the chest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and recorded review, the facility failed to maintain the resident's bed remote control coil line (coiled remote-control cord) in safe operating condition for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). The hard plastic covering of Resident 1's bed remote control coil line was damaged and pointed out. This failure resulted in a laceration (a wound when skin, tissue, and/or muscle was torn or cut open) on Resident 1's inner right hand between the thumb and index finger (also known as the pointer finger, or first finger) measuring 2 centimeters (cm-unit of measurement) in length, by 0.2 cm in width and by 0.2 in depth. Cross Reference : F689 Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 8/29/2024 with diagnoses that included type II Diabetes Mellitus (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), heart failure (a condition when the heart is not able to pump enough blood and oxygen to the body's organs) and respiratory failure (a condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain its infection control/prevention surveillance program for two of two sampled residents (Resident 1 & Resident 2) by failing to: a. Initiate a scabies line list immediately after Resident 1 was confirmed to have scabies from a positive skin scrapping test result. b. Ensure that Infection Control measures were implemented when Resident 2 was identified to be highly suspicious of scabies. This deficient practice compromised infection control measures to prevent the potential spread of infections. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face sheet), dated 8/16/2024, the facility admitted the resident on 6/6/2022, with diagnoses that respiratory failure, transient ischemic attack (a temporary disruption in the blood supply to part of the brain), epilepsy (a common condition that affects the brain and causes frequent seizures), and quadriplegia (a form of paralysis [the loss of the ability to move some or all of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to professional standards of practice for one of five sampled residents (Resident 2), when Resident 2 ' s medication was left unattended at Resident 2 ' s bedside. This deficient practice had the potential to result in mismanagement of Resident 2 ' s medication for pain management and placed the resident at risk for adverse (untoward) consequences. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record (AR) dated 8/13/2024, the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 2/15/2024 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes (persistent elevated blood sugar levels) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems). During a review of Resident 2 ' s History and Physical (H&P) dated 2/16/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 2 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS – a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 9/26/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 2 required setup or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices as outlined in the facility ' s policy for Coronavirus Prevention and Response when one of two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA 2) went inside a Covid-19 (Coronavirus, a highly contagious respiratory disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus that spreads from person to person and can cause mild to severe respiratory illness) isolation (to separate people who are sick) room of Resident 5 without wearing the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). This deficient practice had the potential to spread COVID-19 throughout the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 5 ' s admission Record (AR) dated 8/6/2024, the AR indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes (persistent high blood sugar levels) and liver cirrhosis (condition in which the liver is scarred and permanently damaged) During a review of Resident 5 ' s Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Nail Care, for one of three sampled (Resident 3) by failing to: 1. Ensure assigned Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) trimmed and cleaned the fingernails of Resident 3, who had contractures (condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissues, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) to his left and right hands. 2. Ensure assigned CNAs notified assigned Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) regarding Resident 3's long and overgrown toenails. 3. Ensure assigned LVNs notified the Social Services Director (SSD) that Resident 3 needed to be referred and seen by a podiatrist (medical specialists who help with problems that affect your feet or lower legs) for cleaning and trimming of Resident 3's long and overgrown toenails. These failures had the potential to cause injuries and infection to Resident 3. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, the facility admitted Resident 3 on 6/17/2024, with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for two of two sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 270) by failing to: a. Ensure a call light to accommodate a resident's mobility limitations was provided when Resident 270 was unable to move Resident 270's bilateral upper arms and hands. b. Ensure call light was within reach for Resident 2 who was assessed as high risk for fall as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response and the resident's care plan. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 270 and Resident 2 being unable to notify staff for needs and possibly, an emergency. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 270's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 270 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but are not limited to myotonic muscular dystrophy (genetic condition that causes progressive muscle weakness and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide information of Advance Directive (AD, written preferences regarding treatment options, a process of communication between individuals and their healthcare agents to understand and plan for future healthcare decisions for a time when individuals are not able to make their own healthcare decisions) for two of two sampled residents (Residents 45 and 47) in accordance with facility's policy titled Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives. These failures had the potential for Residents 45 and 47 to receive treatment and services against the residents' will. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 45's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in elevated levels of glucose/sugar in the blood and urine) with hyperglycemia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services for the resident's suprapubic catheter (a hollow, flexible tube used to drain urine from the bladder through a cut in the abdomen) and indwelling catheter (a medical device that helped drain urine from the bladder) as ordered by the physician and as indicated in the resident's plan of care for two of four sampled residents selected for catheter care area (Resident 15 and Resident 11). These failures had the potential to result in catheter-related complications for Resident 15 and Resident 11. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 15's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, the facility admitted Resident 15 to the facility on 1/23/2003, and readmitted the resident on 11/6/2023, with diagnoses that included hydroureter (a condition where the ureter became larger than normal due to urine backup), chronic kidney disease (longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure), and retention of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) for enteral feeding (tube feeding that supplies nutrients and fluids to the body if unable to safely chew or swallow) for two of three sampled residents (Residents 2 and 274 ) when: a. Gastrostomy tube (G-tube, feeding tube that is surgically placed through an opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall) dressing for Resident 2 was not changed per protocol. b. Enteral feeding was left ongoing while Resident 274 was lying flat on the bed. These failures had the potential for infection for Resident 2 and complication of aspiration (when food/liquid enter a resident's airway and lungs by accident) for Resident 274 . Findings: a. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, the facility admitted Resident 2 to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted the resident on 2/20/2024, with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and attention to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Residents 30 and 274) receiving oxygen therapy were provided respiratory care and resident safety in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Oxygen Administration and Sudden Respiratory Distress Differential Diagnosis, by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 30's nasal cannula tubing (flexible plastic tubing used to deliver oxygen through the nostrils) was kept in covered in plastic bag when not in use and not rolled and inserted to the handle of the oxygen concentrator (a medical device that concentrates oxygen from environmental air and delivers it to the resident in need of supplemental oxygen). b. Ensure Resident 274 had a spare tracheostomy tube (tube inserted from an opening in the neck into the trachea [windpipe]) readily available at bedside. These deficient practices had the potential for infection for Resident 30 and failure to maintain a patent (open) airway during an emergency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to attempt appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail for two of two sampled residents (Residents 17 and 170). This deficient practice had the potential for accidents that could lead to injury. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/2/2023, with diagnoses that included dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning) and epilepsy (brain disorder in which a person has repeated seizures [convulsions] over time) During a review of Resident 17's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 3/5/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 17 had severely impaired cognitive (ability to understand) skills for daily decision making. The MDS indicated Resident 17 was totally dependent with all activities of daily living.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for five of five sampled residents ( Residents 35, 8, 61, 42 and 274), when the facility failed to: a. Ensure wound care was performed to Resident 35 in a manner that would prevent introduction of potentially contaminated material into the wound. b. Ensure curtains were changed during deep cleaning for two (Residents 8 and 61) of 28 rooms in the facility. c. Ensure the IPN changed gloves and perform hand hygiene after touching Resident 42's indwelling catheter (foley catheter - a tube inserted in the bladder to drain urine into a drainage bag). d. Ensure the Nurse Practitioner (NP) wore the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards and illnesses) prior to performing a physical assessment (examination) of Resident 274 who was placed on Enhanced Barrier…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate and implement a care plan for one of one sampled resident (Resident 274) when Resident 274 has a left lateral (side) mid foot unstageable (bed sore that occurred when there was prolong pressure on a specific area to the skin resulting in an open wound. Tissue was lost and the depth of the wound was obscured by eschar [dry, dead tissue within the wound]) pressure injury (PI), left medial (toward middle or center) foot unstageable PI, left medial malleolus (ankle bone) stage two (shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed) PI, left metatarsal (long bone in each foot) first toe unstageable PI, right heel deep tissue injury (DTI, pressure injury that are purple or maroon that appear on intact skin due to damage of underlying tissue), right lateral malleolus unstageable PI, right lateral mid foot stage two PI, left lateral lower leg unstageable PI, and right posterior lower leg PI. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 274's PIs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) selected for language/communication care area was provided with Passy-Muir Valve (PMV, allow tracheostomy [a procedure to help air and oxygen reach the lungs by creating an opening into the trachea (windpipe) from outside the neck] patients to produce speech sounds) for effective communication. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to not receive necessary care and services due to lack of effective communication aids. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, the facility initially admitted Resident 2 to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted the resident on 2/20/2024, with diagnoses that included tracheostomy and chronic respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow own policy and procedure (P&P) for pressure injury (PI, injuries to the skin and tissue below that are due to pressure on skin for long periods of time) prevention for one of one sampled residents (Resident 274). Resident 274's bilateral heel protectors (cushioned heel protectors that assist in reducing pressure in heels which can decrease the risk of pressure damage) were not on per Medical Doctor's (MD) order. Resident 274 who had a left lateral (side) mid foot unstageable (bed sore that occurs when there is prolong pressure on a specific area to the skin resulting in an open wound. Tissue was lost and the depth of the wound were obscured by eschar [dry, dead tissue within the wound]) PI, left medial (toward middle or center) foot unstageable PI, left medial malleolus (ankle bone) stage two (shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed) PI, right heel deep tissue injury (DTI, pressure ulcers that were purple or maroon that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services for one of five sampled residents (Resident 48) with pressure ulcers (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence as a result of pressure) by failing to turn and reposition Resident 48 every two hours as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Turning and Repositioning and Resident 48's care plan. This failure had the potential to lead to further skin breakdown (damage to the skin's surface), infection, worsening, and/or delayed wound healing for Resident 48. Findings: During a review of Resident 48's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated, the facility initially admitted Resident 48 to the facility on 5/12/2023, and readmitted the resident on 10/13/2023, with diagnoses that included stage 4 (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle) pressure ulcers (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) on the right and left buttock, sacral region (at the bottom of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right-hand splint (a medical device that supported and protected joints and its surrounding structures and worked by positioning the hand and wrist correctly) was maintained and properly applied in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled, Restorative Nursing Programs and resident's care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 16) selected for position mobility care area. This deficient practice placed Resident 16 at risk for contractures and had the potential to cause decline in Resident 16's physical function. Findings: During a review of Resident 16's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, the facility admitted Resident 16 to the facility on 8/6/2020, with diagnoses that included muscle wasting (loss of muscle mass and strength) and contracture (shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, skin, and other tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become stiff) of right and left hand. During a review of the Resident 16's untitled Care Plan (CP), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to supervise and follow policy and procedure (P&P) for Hoyer Lift (mechanical device that is operated by two people and used to lift and transfer residents safely) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 274) by failling to ensure 2 staff memberd operated the Hoyer lift to lift Resident 274 from the resident's bed. Resident 274 was left suspended in the air, unsupervised when Certified Nurse Assistant 2 (CNA 2) walked away from the Hoyer Lift to close the currtain. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 274 to sustain a serious injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 274's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 274 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to pressure injuries (PI, injuries to the skin and tissues that were due to prolonged pressure) of the sacral region, right and left buttocks, right ankle, right heel stage one (intact skin with non-blanchable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision or touching assistance during meals for one of one sampled resident (Resident 19) with weight loss. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to further weight loss for Resident 19. Findings: During a review of Resident 19's admission Record(AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/1/2022 with diagnoses that included dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning) and Parkinson's disease (disease that affects the nerve cells in the brain that produces symptoms that include muscle rigidity, tremors, and changes in speech and gait.) During a review of Resident 19's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 3/8/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 19 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 19 was dependent with sit to lying, lying to sitting on side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label and date the midline intravenous catheter (a long, thin, flexible tube that is inserted into a large vein in the upper arm used to administer medication into the bloodstream) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 45) in accordance with the facility's policy titled Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion, Maintenance and Removal and resident's care plan. This failure had the potential to result in infection to Resident 45 and worsen the residents' health condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 45's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus a disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in elevated levels of glucose/sugar in the blood and urine) with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). During a review of Resident 45's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/20/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) contained an accurate description of the actual experiences of Resident 1 by failing to ensure: 1. Details regarding an incident with the mechanical lift (a device used by staff to transfer residents from a bed to a chair or other similar places) which occurred on 1/19/24 were documented in Resident 1's medical record. 2. Details regarding dislodgement of Resident 1's intravenous line (IV; a soft, flexible tube placed inside a vein, usually in the hand or arm, and used by health care providers to give a person medicine or fluids) on 1/2/24 were documented in Resident 1's medical record. 3. The correct site of Resident 1's midline IV (an IV which is inserted into a larger vein using a longer catheter and can be left in the vein longer than a regular IV) was documented in Resident 1's medical record. These failures had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive appropriate care and treatment due to an incomplete/inaccurate medical record. Findings: 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure on reporting of alleged abuse violation, by failing to ensure one of one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 2) report abuse allegation on Resident 1 to the facility's abuse coordinator. This deficient practice resulted in the delay of investigation of the alleged abuse allegation and had the potential to result in violation of Resident 1's right to be free from abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 1/2/2024 with diagnoses that included vascular dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning) and wedge compression fracture (type of broken bone that can cause vertebrae to collapse, making them shorter) of the fifth lumbar vertebra. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/2/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 1 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 ' s treatment orders for skin rashes were ordered on 10/12/23 and was not started until four days later on 10/16/23. This deficient practice resulted in delayed treatment and healing of Resident 1 ' s skin rashes. Findings: During a review Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage (caused by complete lack of oxygen in the brain) and diabetes mellitus (a chronic disease that occurs when the pancreas[an organ located in the abdomen] does not produce enough insulin [hormone that regulates blood sugar] or when the body cannot effectively use the insulin it produces). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 10/20/23, indicated Resident 1 had memory recall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0911 — patternEnsure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review the facility's waiver request, the facility failed to ensure one of 28 resident's room in the Sub Acute Unit accommodated no more than four residents in a multiple resident room. room [ROOM NUMBER] had five beds to accommodate five residents. This deficient practice had the potential risk for privacy concerns and crowded condition in the room. Findings: During an entrance conference with the facility Administrator (ADM) on 3/18/2025 at 9:51 am, the ADM stated the facility had one room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) that had more than four residents occupying the room. The ADM stated, the facility would request a room waiver for six (6) beds in room [ROOM NUMBER]. During the Health Recertification Survey from 3/18/2025 to 3/21/2024, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with five resident beds, side tables, dresser and resident care equipment. Staff were able to move freely inside the room. Out of the 5 beds inside room [ROOM NUMBER], four beds were occupied by residents. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Amended : 5/13/2025. The facility submitted a Revised Room Waiver Request Letter dated 5/12/2025. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 9 of 28 rooms (Rooms 16,19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 26, 27 and 32) met the square footage requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in multiple resident rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to impact resident's safety and the ability of staff to provide safe nursing care and privacy to the residents. Findings: During an interview with the facility Administrator (ADM) on 3/18/2025 at 9:51 am, the ADM stated the facility would like to request a room waiver (a document recording the waiving of a right or claim) for Rooms 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 32, 33 and 35. The ADM stated nothing was changed in the number of bed occupancy in Rooms 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 32, 33 and 35 from last year. During the Health Recertification Survey from 3/18/2025 to 3/21/2025, Rooms 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-04-12 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment and care planning tool) dated 1/11/2024 assessment reflected an accurate assessment of the discharge destination for two of two sampled residents (Residents 68 and 67) by failing to ensure : a. Resident 68 who was discharged to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF - an inpatient rehabilitation and medical treatment center staffed with trained medical professionals) was coded in the MDS assessment as being discharged to home. b. Resident 67 who was discharged to home was coded in the MDS assessment as being discharged to a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH). These deficient practices resulted in an inaccurate reporting to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS, a federal agency that administers the Medicare program and works with state governments to administer the Medicaid and health insurance portability standards) agency and had the potential for Residents 68 and 67 not to receive interventions to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0911 — patternEnsure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of the facility's room waiver request, the facility failed to ensure one of 28 residents' room, accommodated no more than four residents in a multiple resident room (room [ROOM NUMBER]). room [ROOM NUMBER] had five beds to accommodate five residents in the Sub Acute Unit. This deficient practice had the potential risk for privacy concerns and crowded condition in the room. Findings: During an entrance conference with the facility Administrator (ADM) on 4/9/2024 at 9:54 am, the ADM stated, room [ROOM NUMBER] had more than four residents occupying the room. The ADM stated, the facility would continue to request a room waiver for room [ROOM NUMBER]. During the Health Recertification Survey from 4/9/2024 to 4/12/2024, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with beds, side tables, dresser, and resident care equipment. Staff were able to move freely inside room [ROOM NUMBER]. During an observation on 4/12/2024 at 9:10 am, there were 28 residents' rooms in the facility. One of the 28…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 14 of 28 rooms (Rooms 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 32, 33 and 35) met the square footage requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in multiple resident rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to impact resident's safety and the ability of staff to provide safe nursing care and privacy to the residents. Findings: During an interview with the facility Administrator (ADM) on 4/9/2024 at 9:54 am, the ADM stated the facility would request a room waiver (a document recording the waiving of a right or claim) for Rooms 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 32, 33 and 35. The ADM stated there was no change and the number of bed occupancy in Rooms 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 32, 33 and 35 remained the same. During a review of the facility's letter to request for room waiver dated 4/9/2024, the letter to request for room waiver indicated the rooms were in accordance with special needs of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIBRALTAR CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/1977 |
| STEWART, SELINA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/23/2020 |
| JOHNSON, FRANK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/01/1977 |
| PRESNELL, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/1977 |
| DEHGHANMANESH, ADRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| SUN MAR MANAGEMENT SERVICES | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/1977 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055104. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.