No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Knolls West Post Acute LLC

16890 Green Tree Blvd, Victorville, CA 92395 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 118 certified beds · (760) 245-5361 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (760) 245-5361 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0606) — cited Sep 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Sep 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
14668 7th St · (760) 475-7420 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
12998 Hesperia Rd · (760) 241-0508 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
13708 Hesperia Rd · (760) 843-5440 · Call to confirm hours
Park
16300 Pebble Beach Dr · (760) 245-6467 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.2%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.9%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms86.6%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%1.6%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.1%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.2%13.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.2%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers10.3%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.6%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.4%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.2%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.1%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.8%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days4.402.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.271.571.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 366 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
29.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.55U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.36hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 29.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 216 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.3%CMS range 48.2–57.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.6%CMS range 6.6–11.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge29.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge36.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge26.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge87.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.4%CMS range 6.0–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.641.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
1.46
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.73
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.65
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
53.8%
Total nursing turnover
43.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 109.3 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.73 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.75 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-22)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's policy and procedure titled Policy and Procedure on Pressure Ulcers (wounds caused by prolonged pressure on a bony prominence that may be superficial (Stage 1) to involving damage which includes all layers of skin down to the bone (Stage IV), dated August 22, 2017, for two of two sampled residents (Residents 3 and 44) was followed when: 1. The facility did not provide documented evidence for Resident 3 who had a Stage 4 pressure (involves all layers of skin down to the bone) ulcer on the sacrum (located above the tailbone) and a Stage 3 pressure (Involves all layers of skin down to the muscle) ulcer on the left hip to show the resident had been repositioned at least every two hours to prevent further pressure on the wounds. 2. For Resident 44: the facility did not conduct a full assessment (includes: Type of Ulcer, Location, Stage of Pressure Ulcer, Measurements, Non-viable tissue, Odor, Amount of Exudate [fluid],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the policy and procedure (P&P) for change of condition was followed for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1), when one License Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) did not notify the physician and Resident 1's family promptly after Resident 1 eloped (Resident leaves facility without being officially discharged ) on June 11, 2026. This failure resulted in delayed communication regarding a significant change in Resident 1's condition and location placing Resident 1 at risk for injury without timely medical evaluation and follow-up.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), the face sheet indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included encephalopathy (any brain disease, damage, or malfunction that alters how your brain works), and epilepsy (a brain condition that causes a person to have repeated, unexpected seizures). During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1), When one Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) mistakenly documented that the physician was notified of Resident 1's elopement (Resident leaves the facility without being officially discharged ). This failure resulted in an inaccurate medical record and had the potential to affect communication among healthcare providers and the delivery of resident care.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (any brain disease, damage, or malfunction that alters how your brain works), and epilepsy (a brain condition that causes a person to have repeated, unexpected seizures) During a review of Resident 1's Change of Condition (COC) report, dated June 11, 2026, the COC report indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were processed and released in accordance with facility policy and federal regulations for one of four residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to jeopardize Resident 1's authorized representative's access to medical records through lawful authorization requests, potentially adversely impacting legal matters related to the resident.During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 1 was admitted to facility on April 2, 2025, with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung condition that makes breathing difficult due to damaged), acute respiratory failure (life threatening sudden inability of the lungs to oxygenate blood or carbon dioxide), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (disorder characterized by high blood sugar). During a telephone interview with the Law Office Staff, on May 6, 2026, at 8:43 AM, she stated their law office had been requesting Resident's 1 medical records from the facility since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were processed and released according to federal regulations for one of four residents (Resident 1).This failure had the potential to jeopardize Resident 1's authorized representative's access to medical records through lawful authorization requests, potentially adversely impacting legal matters related to the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that includes encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system (focuses on pain management, wound care, and gradual dietary changes to avoid complications following operation), encounter for attention to ileostomy (maintenance of stoma [surgically created opening on the stomach that diverts waste]) , and benign neoplasm of transverse colon (non-cancerous, non-spreading growth on the large…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain food safety practices in the kitchen as required by facility's policy and procedure (P&P). The facility did not ensure food preparation areas, equipment, and storage were kept clean, labeled, and safe and failed to prevent cross-contamination, improper thawing and unsanitary conditions when: 1. One kitchen staff was not wearing a hairnet in the food prep area. 2. The juice machine nuzzle, and black rubber ring had dark grime, old stains, and residue. 3. Six red colored drink pitchers were left on a counter without date labels. 4. A large blue plastic container labeled ICE ONLY was found uncovered and filled with ice on a metal prep table. 5. Two dented cans (6 lbs.) of pears in light syrup were found in the kitchen ready to use. 6. About 20 packages of raw meat were thawing in stacked plastic container under running water in the sanitizing compartment of the three-compartment sink; the meat was not labeled with thawing dates and temperature measured 62.4°F. 7. Four trays of uncovered deserts bowls…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain essential kitchen equipment in safety operating condition when: 1. Two ovens located in the kitchen were observed to be non-functional not in use, yet they remained accessible and unmarked as out of order. This failure has the potential to result in limited cooking capacity, delays, and disruption in the kitchen's ability to deliver timely meals and maintain appropriate sanitation. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on May 19, 2025, at 9:06 AM with the Dietary Services Supervisor Assistant 1 (DSSA 1) inside the kitchen, during and inspection two of five ovens were to be visible nonfunctional. The second oven (Oven 2) had heavy blackened residue, grease build up, burned on grease and buildup from old food spills, along with rust on the interior walls, racks and bottom tray. The oven was grimy and clearly nonoperational, with no signage or markings indicating it was out of order. DSSA 1 stated the oven should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure physician's visits were conducted or physician's orders were signed in a timely manner when: 1. Two of eight sampled residents (Residents 19 and 22) were missing required physician's visits for their Medicare Part A&B (Government hospital insurance and medical insurance) stay. This failure had the potential to result in transcription errors for Resident 19 and 22. 2. Four of eight sampled residents (Resident 14, 44, 56, and 43) had unsigned physician's orders in their chart. This failure had the potential to result in medical errors, and increased risk to resident's safety for Resident 14, 44, 56, and 43. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 19's face sheet (demographic information) indicates Resident 19 is an [AGE] year-old female, admitted from the hospital on March 12, 2025, with diagnoses which include arthritis (redness, painful, swollen joint), atrial fibrillation (irregular rhythm that disrupts the normal flow of blood through the heart),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident dignity for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 311) reviewed for dignity practices by not providing a dignity bag (a cover placed over a urine collection bag so others cannot see the urine) for the foley catheter bag (a thin tube place in the bladder to drain urine into a bag) which exposed the urine contents to public view. This failure has the potential to cause Resident 311 embarrassment, and emotional distress (Feeling upset, anxious or humiliated), and loss of dignity (feeling disrespected or devaluated as a person). Findings: During a review of Resident 311's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 311 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the admitted diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (weakness on one side of the body (left side) after a stroke making it hard to move), Acute and Chronic Respiratory failure ( the lungs don't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge were sent to the Ombudsman for one of two sampled residents (Resident 106) reviewed for hospitalization when Resident 106 was sent to the hospital on February 9, 2025, and there was no copy of notice of transfer or discharge sent to the Ombudsman. This failure had the potential for Resident 106 to be inappropriately transferred or discharged . Findings: During a review of Resident 106's clinical record, the admission Record (a document that gives a summary of resident's information) indicated Resident 106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for cellulitis (infection of the skin) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing). During a review Resident 106's physician order (a set of instructions written by a doctor for the care of the resident) dated February 9, 2025, the physician's order indicated, Send patient to Desert Valley Hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS - a computerized resident assessment tool) for two sampled residents (Resident 84 and Resident 99) when: 1. For Resident 84's RAI-MDS assessment was not coded to indicate she had a diagnosis of schizophrenia (a chronic mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). 2. For Resident 99's RAI-MDS assessment was not coded to indicate she had a stage 1 pressure ulcer (bed sore). These failures resulted in the MDS assessments for Resident's 84 and 99 to inaccurately reflect their current medical status which had the potential to result in unmet care needs for the residents. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 84's admission Record, (contains medical and demographic information), the admission Record, indicated Resident 84 was initially admitted on [DATE], with admitting diagnoses which included schizophrenia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS- a federally required resident assessment tool used to plan care and track clinical status) for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 64) reviewed for MDS coding accuracy when the facility inaccurately, documented Resident 64 received antibiotics in February 2025, despite no physician's orders showing antibiotic use. This failure has the potential to cause poor care planning and inaccurate understanding of Resident 64's health, increasing the risk Resident 64's needs will not be met. Findings: During a review Resident 64's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the admitted diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease (poor blood circulation), stiffness of right ankle (limited movement), stiffness of left ankle (limited movement) During a review of Resident 64's MDS (Minimum Data Set) Section N0300-Medications,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to update Resident 84's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a federally mandated program that requires all individuals seeking admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility to be screened to ensure individuals who are identified to have a significant mental illness [SMI], intellectual or developmental disability [I/DD] are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) when Resident 84 did not have her diagnosis of schizophrenia (a chronic mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves) included in the PASRR assessment used to admit Resident 84 into the skilled nursing facility. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 84 to not be accurately assessed regarding the need for treatment and services in alternate care settings to better suite the needs of Resident 84. Findings: During a review of Resident 84's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physical therapy services were provided to one of three residents (Resident 59) sampled for rehabilitative and restorative services when Resident 59 did not receive physical therapy five times a week as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to cause a decrease in Resident 59 overall functioning or the inability for Resident 59 to reach his/her highest level of functioning. Findings: During a review of Resident 59's face sheet (contains medical and demographic information), the face sheet indicated Resident 59 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included polyneuropathy (condition in which multiple nerves are damaged or dysfunctional on both sides of the body, often leading to symptoms like weakness, numbness, and burning pain), generalized osteoarthritis (breakdown of cartilage in multiple joints, leading to pain, stiffness, and decreased joint function), heart failure (the heart not being able to fill…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for heel protector boots for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 64) reviewed for skin integrity when Resident 64 was observed without the ordered heel protectors and was documented to have develop a deep tissue injury (DTI). This failure has the potential to contribute to Resident 64 delayed wound healing (slower recovery of injured skin and tissue), pain (physical discomfort), and further skin breakdown (worsening skin condition leading to open wounds). Findings: During a review Resident 64's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the admitted diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease (poor blood circulation), stiffness of right ankle (limited movement), stiffness of left ankle (limited movement). During an observation on May 19, 2025, at 10:50 AM inside Resident 64's room, Resident 64 was lying down on her back…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician conducted an initial comprehensive visit within the first 30 days after admission, for two sampled residents under a Medicare Part A&B stay (Resident 19 and 22). This failure has the potential to place Residents 19 and 22 at risk for serious harm or death. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 19's face sheet (demographic information) indicates Resident 19 is an [AGE] year-old female, admitted from the hospital on March 12, 2025, with diagnoses which include arthritis (redness, painful, swollen joint), atrial fibrillation (irregular rhythm that disrupts the normal flow of blood through the heart), hyperlipidemia (having too much fat in the blood), dementia (group of conditions that cause a progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment), nutritional deficiency (occurs when someone doesn't get enough of the essential nutrients their body needs to function properly,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure staff signed the narcotic reconciliation log when discrepancies were found in two of four narcotic reconciliation logbooks. This failure had the potential to result in improper administration of medication and dosage, increasing risk of adverse drug reactions, and possible harm to 106 vulnerable patients. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Registered Nurse Supervisor 3 (RNS 3), on May 21, 2025, at 5:07 AM, in the hallway, the narcotic reconciliation logbook in station 4 was inspected. The dates: March 7, 18, 19, 26; April 13, 17, 24; May 14, 20, 21, 2025 were missing signatures. RNS 3 confirmed the dates were missing signatures. During a concurrent observation and interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse 5 (LVN 5), on May 21, 2025, at 1:04 PM, in the hallway, the narcotic reconciliation logbook in station 1 was inspected. The dates: March 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 22, 25, 26, 29; May 19, 20, 21, 2025 were missing signatures. LVN 5 confirmed the dates were missing signatures. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure secure storage of medications when: 1. One Medication Storage room and one Medication Refrigerator located at Nursing station 4 was found unlocked, and 2. One medication refrigerator located at Nursing station 1 was found unlocked. This failure has the potential for medications to be accessed and dispersed by an unauthorized person, in a vulnerable population of 103 residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on May 19, 2025, at 8:44 AM, the Medication Storage room located at the Nursing station 4 was accessed without a key by Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1). Inside the Medication Storage room, the Medication Refrigerator displays lock latches in place and no padlock. The unlocked medication refrigerator contains vials of injectable Ativan (a medication used to treat anxiety) and Haldol (a medication used to treat mental disorders), several Insulin (a medication used to treat high blood sugar) pens, and one Emergency Kit. The LVN 1 stated that he started working at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it followed its infection control program when: 1. A Registered nurse Supervisor 3 (RNS 3) did not perform hand hygiene (hand washing or the use of alcohol based hand sanitizer) after performing a blood glucose check (procedure done to check the level of sugar in the blood and requires a pinprick blood sample). This failure had the potential for the spread of infectious blood borne pathogens (bacteria and viruses which can cause disease and illness) and the spread of infectious microorganisms from one patient to another in a vulnerable population of 106 patients. 2. There was a bag of intravenous antibiotics (antibiotics administered into the veins) and IV tubing set (disposable IV set used to administer medication intravenously) dated [DATE] and [DATE], left at Patient 33 bedside on [DATE] (23 days after it was used). This failure had the potential for inadvertent use of an expired IV tubing set or antibiotic bag which was past…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for one of four sample residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was not provided a plan of care to meet Resident 1 ' s nutritional needs. This failure had the potential to place a clinically compromised resident (Resident 1 ' s) overall health and safety at risk. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, dementia (loss of memory), cerebrovascular disease (conditions that affect blood flow to your brain), and muscle weakness generalized (loss of strength in your muscles). A review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record, POLST indicated, Long-term artificial nutrition, including feeding tubes. During an interview on March 26, 2025, at 1:05 PM with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), LVN 1 stated, We usually follow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper care was provided to prevent a pressure ulcer/injury (injury to skin/tissue from prolonged pressure on the skin) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted on resident 1 acquired pressure ulcer to coccyx left and right buttocks (lower back/spine) developed while in the facility. Findings: During review of Residents 1 ' s admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (problem in brain caused by chemical imbalance in blood), down syndrome ( a genetic disorder causing developmental and intellectual delays), sepsis ( a life threatening complication of an infection), osteomyelitis of right hand (bone infection) and cellulitis of right finger (bacterial skin infection). During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 1 ' s clinical records with Treatment Nurse 1 on January 6, 2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to follow their policy and procedure on medication administration when a Licensed Vocational Nurse failed to administer Nifedipine (medication use to lower blood pressure) ordered by physician to one of three sampled Residents (Resident 1). This failure has a potential to place a clinically compromised Resident 1 ' s health and safety at risk. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was last admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, cerebral infarction ( damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area), hypertension ( High blood pressure), gastroesophageal reflux ( involuntary back flow of stomach contents back into the esophagus or food pipe ), rheumatoid arthritis (chronic autoimmune disease that causes inflammation and damage to the joints), malignant neoplasm of female breast ( a cancerous tumor that develops in the breast tissue ), polyneuropathy (affects nerves that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility failed to follow their policy by not following physician ' s order to provide physical therapy five times a week for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to cause contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissues, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) and decreased mobility to Resident 1, by negatively affecting his physical health, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was last admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, wedge compression fracture of first lumbar vertebra (fracture occurs when the actually collapses to the front part of the vertebra and form a wedge shape), polyneuropathy( damage to multiple nerves outside of the brain and affects several nerve in different parts of the body at the same time), hypertension…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed vocational nurse (LVN 1) perform medications administration according to the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) for one of four sample residents (Resident 1) when during resident 1's medication pass, the surveyor noticed that the LVN pre-signed the medication before administering it, failed to check the medication's expiration date, and failed to record on Resident 1's MAR the reason why Amlodipine (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) not available, believing that she could have borrowed Amlodipine from another resident for Resident 1. This deficient practice had the potential to adversely affect the health and safety of Resident 1 who is clinically compromised. Findings: During the review of Resident 1's admission record (a document that gives a summary of resident's information), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included Atherosclerotic heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of physical abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was reported to the local, state, and federal agencies immediately in accordance with their facility's policy. This failure had the potential for the alleged abuse to go uninvestigated and unreported thereby increasing the chances of health, safety, and psychosocial harm to Resident 1. Findings: During an interview with Administrator on September 5, 2024, at 2:30 PM, he stated that he did not feel there was enough evidence based on interviews with witnesses and resident to report it to the state. Stated the son came to him highly upset and he said he felt LVN 1 ( Licensed Vocational Nurse) threw resident on the ground, states what LVN 1 said to him resident was threatening to leave the building and I redirected him and told him to go back to his room He stated I don ' t know why she started to stop him at the nurses station, I usually wait until they get to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolated
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from potential abuse and mistreatment, in a universe of 112 residents, when the facility employed a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) with a disciplinary action (a formal process that imposes consequences or corrective measures for misconduct or violations of professional standards), in effect, against her professional license. This failure had the potential to cause residents to suffer abuse and mistreatment. Findings: An unannounced visit was made to the facility on September 10, 2024, at 10:46 AM, to investigate a facility reported incident regarding an allegation of physical abuse and deprivation of services by LVN 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on September 10, 2024, at 12:39 PM, with a Director of Staff Development (DSD), LVN 1 ' s personnel file and professional license was reviewed. The DSD stated LVN 1 ' s date of hire was February 14, 2024. A review of LVN 1 ' s professional license, dated expiration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their Policy and Procedure when the licensed nurse failed to document the refusal of medication for one of three sampled Residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to place a clinically compromised Resident (Resident 1) health and safety at risk. When not receiving the necessary medication as prescribed by the physician. Findings: During a review of Resident 1s admission Record (general demographics), indicates being admitted to facility April 15, 2024 with diagnosis (DX) of Polyneuropathy (multiple nerves are damage), gastroenteritis and colitis ( inflammation in the digestive tract), bipolar disorder (episodes of mood swings), muscle weakness ( decrease in strength), dysphagia ( difficulty in swallowing), type II diabetes mellitus (sugar imbalance in body), anxiety (feeling of worry), psychotic disorder ( disconnection from reality), and hepatomegaly (enlargement of liver). During interview of Resident 1 on June 18, 2022, at 1:50 pm, Resident in wheelchair, is alert and oriented. Resident 1 stated on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly store and date foods items in 1 (Unit 1 and Unit 2) of 2 nourishment refrigerators in the facility. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Foods Brought by Family and Visitors / Food Storage, revised in January 2022, revealed, 5. Family and other visitors can bring food to be consumed by the resident. a. Non-perishable foods and food appropriate to store at room temperature will be stored in resident room in re-sealable containers. These foods will be discarded on or before the use by' date. If no, use by date is provided, item will be labeled with a use by date 3 days from when the item was received. b. Perishable foods from outside must be consumed, discarded or taken home with visitors on same day the food is brought. Refrigeration is not available for resident's food/leftovers. Intact family prepared meals are okay to be stored for 3 days. c. Intact fresh fruit may be stored unsealed. During an observation of the Unit 1 and Unit 2 nourishment refrigerator on 05/22/2024 at 9:45 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, document review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure timely completion of comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 3 (Residents #16, #69, and #79) of 8 sampled residents reviewed for resident assessments. Findings included: A facility policy titled, MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes, revised in January 2022, revealed, Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. Per the policy, 2. Timeframes for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements published in the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)'s Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2023, revealed The Annual assessment is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed on an annual basis unless an SCSA [significant change in status assessment] or an SCPA [significant correction to prior assessment] has been completed since the most recert…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, document review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure timely completion of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 3 (Residents #58, #96, and #109) of 8 sampled residents reviewed for resident assessments. Findings included: A facility policy titled, MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes, revised in January 2022, revealed, Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. Per the policy, 2. Timeframes for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements published in the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2023, revealed The Quarterly assessment is an OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] non-comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type. It is used to track a resident's status between comprehensive assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to change oxygen tubing weekly as ordered by the physician and store respiratory equipment when not in use as directed by the facility's policy for 1 (Resident #188) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for respiratory care. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Policy and Procedures on Oxygen Therapy, dated August 2017, revealed, 8. When not in use, nasal cannula shall be placed and secured in a clean plastic bag to avoid contamination. An admission Record revealed the facility readmitted the resident on 03/22/2024, with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, and pleural effusion (fluid build-up around the lungs). A 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/29/2024, revealed Resident #188 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident used oxygen therapy. Resident #188's care plan, initiated on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to indicate the duration of an as-needed anti-anxiety medication for 1 (Resident #20) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Policy and Procedure on Psychotropic Medications, dated October 2014, revealed, The facility shall use a psychotherapeutic drug or chemical restraint on residents only as part of a plan to eliminate or modify symptoms for which the drug is prescribed, and only on the written order of a physician that specifies the duration of the use of the medication and the circumstances under which the medication is to be used and only if the resident, or his/her surrogate decision maker has given consent to the use of the medication Per the policy, 4. When a decision is reached and made by the interdisciplinary team and the physician that the resident needs the psychotropic medication/chemical restraint, a written physician's order that specifies the duration of the use of the medication and the circumstances under which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-15 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to uphold residents' rights for visitation for all 105 residents residing within the facility when the facility was restricting visitors by requiring visitors to be tested for COVID-19 (an illness caused by a virus) prior to entering the facility, charging visitors five dollars for COVID-19 tests, limiting visitation time to 1 hour, and by posting limiting visitation hours as was all specified by the Visiting Policy posted at the reception desk (main entrance) of the facility. These failures resulted in the infringement of the rights for visitation of all 105 residents by potentially deterring visitors as a result of the posted requirements. In addition, this failure resulted in the visitor of one resident (Resident 162) to demonstrate verbal frustration regarding the visitation restrictions. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on January 17, 2023, at 1:06 PM, at the facilities main entrance, a visitor for Resident 162 (RV 162) was visibly frustrated and stated during a visit to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-15 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to designate a qualified Director of Food Services to provide the daily oversight of the dietary department which includes, implementing menus, purchasing food, training of staff, and ensuring compliance with all state and federal regulations. This failure had the potential to result in a lack of oversight in the operations of the dietary department and supervision of staff which could lead to poor quality of services in the department. Findings: During an interview on December 5, 2022, at 8:20 A.M., with the Director of Food Services, (DFS) , DFS stated she was the Director of Food Services and runs the day-to-day operations of the kitchen. During further interview on December 5, 2022, at 8: 45 A.M., with the DFS, the DFS stated she was not a certified dietary manager because she failed to pass the test twice given by the Dietary Managers Association (DMA). The DFS also stated she had no bachelor's degree in food and nutrition or completed an approved dietary service training program as required by regulation. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label and discard medications for three of three sampled residents (Residents 20, 5 and 56) when: 1. For Resident 20 there were two vials of Humulin R (a short-acting insulin that starts to work in 30 minutes and lasts for several hours to control a resident's blood sugar) 100 units (a unit of measurement)/ (in) one ml (milliliters-a unit of measurement) insulin which had not been labeled or removed as follows: a. Vial #1 (a small container of glass for holding liquids, number one) indicated an opened date of September 19, 2022. On December 8, 2022, Vial #1 was in the medication cart and available for use. Vial #1 had not been discarded 28 days after the opened date as indicated on the pharmacy label. b. Vial #2 was open but did not indicate an opened date. 2. For Resident 5, a vial (a small container of glass for holding liquids) of Humulin R (a short-acting insulin that starts to work in 30 minutes and lasts for several hours to control…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu when pureed (smooth, pudding consistency food that does nt require chewing) peaches were served instead of the pureed peach cobbler as indicated in the lunch menu for 4 of 109 residents. This failure had the potential to disregard resident's food choices when a dessert substitute was served during lunch. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on December 8, 2022, at 1:15 PM, with the Director of Food Service (DFS) in the facility conference room, the texture and taste of the pureed desert was observed to be different. The DFS tasted the regular dessert and the pureed dessert, and she stated, Yes, the taste and texture between the two are different. During a concurrent interview and record review on December 8, 2022, at 2:40 PM, with Dietary Aid 3 (DA3) , Recipe Name: Pureed Dessert, undated was reviewed. It indicated, Ingredients, Dessert , Regular Portion . Directions:1. Remove portions required from regular prepared recipe. Place in food processor and process until smooth.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-15 · tag F0825 — pattern
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services for the ordered number of frequencies for specialized rehabilitative services as determined by Physical Therapy for 2 Residents (29 and 358) as ordered by the physician. These failures had the potential to cause a decline in the residents' functional status and/or prohibit the optimization of their functional status. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on December 6, 2022, at 3:19 PM Resident 358 stated she has left sided weakness due to a stroke and had not been getting physical therapy that she should be getting, because the therapist has been gone on vacation. Resident 358 was observed lying in bed, with maximum assistance needed to reach for items at bedside table. A record review of Resident 358's Physical Therapy Evaluation and Plan of Treatment, for the certification period of October 27, 2022, through November 25, 2022, listed the following: Diagnoses include Muscle weakness, and Hemiplegia following a cerebral infarction (paralysis of one side of body due to an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a computerized clinical assessment) Significant Change assessment within 14 days for one resident, Resident 8, reviewed for hospice services. This failure had the potential to delay identification and implementation of the resident's care and support needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's clinical record, the admission Record (a document containing clinical and demographic information) was reviewed. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included heart failure (a weakened heart condition), chronic kidney disease stage III (kidney malfunctioning disease that has progressed to the third of five stages), and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (when not enough protein or calories are consumed to meet nutritional needs). The clinical record further indicated that the resident was admitted under hospice services on December 10, 2021. During a concurrent interview and record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately identify on three different Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a computerized clinical assessment) assessments for one resident, Resident 8, that the resident was receiving hospice (a program providing services for the care of terminally ill residents and their family) services. This failure had the potential to delay identification and implementation of the resident's care and support needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's clinical record, the admission Record (a document containing clinical and demographic information) was reviewed. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included heart failure (a weakened heart condition), chronic kidney disease stage III (kidney malfunctioning disease that has progressed to the third of five stages), and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (when not enough protein or calories are consumed to meet nutritional needs). The clinical record further indicated that the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an individualized comprehensive care plan was initiated for one out of 32 residents (Resident 57) for care and precautions to be taken for a resident with a gastrostomy (insertion of tube through the abdomen wall through which liquid nourishments and medications can be administered) feeding . This failure had the potential for Resident 57 to develop nutritional risks from unidentified care concerns or place him at risk for aspiration (inhalation of food or fluid into the lungs) if preventive measures were not care planned. Findings: During a review of Resident 57's admission Record, (contains demographic and medical information), undated, indicated Resident 57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dementia (a group of conditions affecting the ability to remember, think or make decisions), and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (muscle weakness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide colostomy (an opening for the large intestine through the abdomen where stool is passed) care for one out of 32 residents (Resident 67). This failure had the potential to cause Resident 67 to suffer increased infection, pain, and unpleasant odors due to the colostomy bag not being emptied or skin not being cleansed to prevent breakdown. FINIDNGS During a review of Resident 67's admission Record, (contains demographic and medical information), undated, indicated Resident 67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included heart failure (a condition in which the heart does not pump blood adequately), end stage renal disease (a condition in which the kidney does not function), dysphagia (inability to swallow) and bed confinement status (inability to tolerate activity out of bed). During an interview on December 7, 2022, at 8:45 AM, Resident 67 stated she had been waiting for two hours for the treatment nurse to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of one sampled resident (Resident 44) when: For Resident 44, a significant weight loss of 5.65% (percent) in 1 (one) month and a continued weight loss of 11.29% in approximately two plus months was identified, but a Weight Change Review, was not documented, Resident 44's care plan was not updated to address Resident 44's refusal to eat, or the impact of nutritional deficits on wound healing for a Deep Tissue Injury (DTI- a form of pressure ulcer. Pressure ulcers are localized areas of tissue damage that develop because of prolonged pressure on bony prominences-areas of bone that are close to the skin's surface). Resident 44 was not placed on weekly weights and Resident 44's DTI was not included in Resident 44's Nutritional Assessments dated October 5, 2022, October 12, 2022, October 19, 2022, and November 9, 2022. These failures to address Resident 44's weight loss had the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a missed dialysis (a process of filtering out the blood through a machine, when the kidneys are unable to do it by themselves) treatment for one resident, Resident 408. This failure had the potential for the resident to experience serious side effects due to the build up of toxins in the blood that the dialysis filters out, high blood pressure and fluid retention. Findings: During a review of the clinical record for Resident 408, the admission Record (a document containing clinical and demographic information) was reviewed. Resident 408 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (kidney disease that has progressed to the last of five stages, usually requiring dialysis), cellulitis (skin infection) of both lower extremities, hypertension (high blood pressure), and congestive heart failure (a weakened heart condition that causes fluid buildup in the body). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 7) demonstrated competency when she prepared insulin (a medication used to help control blood sugar levels) in accordance with manufacturers recommendations when she drew up insulin from a prefilled insulin syringe into a separate insulin syringe for administration to Resident A. This failure had the potential for the increased risk of medication errors, and to alter the efficacy (ability to produce desired effects) and accuracy of the prefilled insulin pen for subsequent injections. Findings: During an observation on December 11, 2022, at 5:01 AM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse 7 (LVN 7), LVN 7 was preparing medications for administration to Resident A. During the preparation of Insulin Aspart (a short acting insulin), LVN 7 used a separate insulin syringe and inserted the needle into the tip of the Insulin Aspart [brand name of insulin pen] prefilled syringe and withdrew 6 units of insulin for administration to Resident A. LVN 7 then subcutaneously (into the fatty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one staff member (Licensed Vocational Nurse 5 - LVN 5) followed the facility policy and procedure for medication administration when the nurse did not review the pharmacy medication label (a label applied to the medication with information regarding who the medication belongs to, the name of the medication, the dose etc) for insulin (a medication used to help regulate blood sugar levels) prior to attempting to administer the medication to Resident 56. This failure had the potential to result in physical harm to Resident 56 as a result of the increased risk of a medication error when the five rights of medication administration (five principles used to help prevent medication errors by verifying: right medication, right dose, right time, right route, right patient) were not verified prior to administration to the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 56's medical record, the admission Record (contains medical and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinical records for six residents (Residents 3, 28, 64, 67, 78, and 161) were complete and accurate when: 1. The Physician's Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST - Written medical orders that addresses a limited number of critical medical decisions) for five of five residents (Residents 3, 28, 64, 67, and 78) reviewed for advance directives (a legal document that explains how an individual wants medical decisions to be made if the individual is incapable of making their own decisions) was left blank regarding whether or not an advance directive existed for the residents. This failure had the potential to result in a delay of treatment for the residents as related to advance directives, or for life sustaining measures to be rendered against what the resident wanted. 2. Certified Nursing Assistants did not document bowel movements (stooling) for Resident 161 between December 1, 2022, and December 6, 2022, in accordance with the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide evidence the Medical Director or a designee, attended Quality Assurance and Process Improvement (QAPI) meetings for the first quarter (January 1 - March 31) and second quarter (April 1 - June 30) of 2022. This failure resulted in the facilities inability to provide evidence the Medical Director or designee (a required QAPI member) had participation in, and had an opportunity to provide meaningful insight, during required quality assurance meetings regarding facility operations. Findings: During an interview on December 13, 2022, at 5:26 PM, with the Administrator (ADMIN), the ADMIN stated one of the purposes of the QAPI committee was to decide on which facility problem-prone areas the facility would work on improving based upon data the QAPI team was collecting, and the ongoing concerns based on the severity of the identified issues and overall impact on the resident population. During an interview on December 13, 2022, at 5:51 PM, with the ADMIN, the ADMIN stated the required QAPI committee members included the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices when: 1. The Facility did not ensure that visitors of Resident 158, who had clostridium difficile (C-Diff- a bacteria causing diarrhea and infection in the intestines) were educated about isolation precautions, proper protective equipment, and hand hygiene. 2. The facility did not ensure that proper hand hygiene was done before and after providing direct care for Residents 409 and 72. 3. The facility did not remove Resident 49's Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC - a thin, long catheter that is inserted through a vein in the upper arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart, for administration of medications or liquid nutrition) after an intravenous (IV) antibiotic was completed. These failures had the potential to cause and spread infectious disease (disease caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi, or parasites) to residents and staff in the facility. Findings: 1. During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2025-05-22 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure quarterly (every 3 months) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data (data combining census and staffing information) report required by Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), was transmitted (submitted) to CMS in accordance with federal submissions timeframes, for quarter 2 (January 1 through March 31 of 2024. This failure resulted in inadequate monitoring of staffing information to be transmitted to CMS. Findings: During a record review of the PBJ Staffing data report for quarter 2 of 2024 for January 1 through March 31, 2024, no PBJ data was submitted (due May 15, 2024). On May 22 at 2:00 PM a policy and procedure (P&P) was requested from the facility, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated I don't have one. During a phone interview on May 22, 2025 at 2:21 PM with the Administration resource, the Administration Resource stated one of her roles was ensuring the PBJ Staffing Data report is submitted on a timely basis. The Administration Resource verified and stated quarter 2 of 2024 was not submitted. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2022-12-15 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report accurate Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) data when there was a discrepancy between the staffing hours reported and the actual staffing hours worked. This failure had the potential for staffing hours to not be met which could delay care needed by 109 residents in the facility. Findings: A record review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report from [name of oversight agency] showed the facility had excessive low weekend staffing for the quarters January 1, 2022 through March 31, 2022, and from April 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022. During an interview on December 8, 2022, at 12:00PM with the Director of Nursing (DON), she reported there were always licensed staff available 24 hours a day seven days a week in the facility. The DON stated the PBJ was inaccurately reflecting excessive low weekend staffing, but upon review of the facility's Direct Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD) which showed the direct service hours worked, payroll, and sign-in documents, the facility was meeting the required staffing hours. The DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 54.3-2.3 vs chain
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bay View Rehabilitation Hospital, LLCAlameda, CA 1 of 5Crescent City Care CenterCrescent City, CA 1 of 5French Park Care CenterSanta Ana, CA 1 of 5North Valley Nursing CenterTujunga, CA 1 of 5Tarzana Health And Rehabilitation CenterTarzana, CA 2 of 5Blythe Post Acute LLCBlythe, CA 2 of 5College Vista Post-AcuteLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Cottage Crest Post AcuteNorwalk, CA 2 of 5Diamond Ridge Healthcare CenterPittsburg, CA 2 of 5Gordon Lane Care CenterFullerton, CA 2 of 5Heritage ManorMonterey Park, CA 2 of 5Spring Valley Post Acute LLCVictorville, CA 2 of 5Sunny Hills Post AcuteLa Mirada, CA 2 of 5Torrey Pines Post Acute And RehabilitationLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Trabuco Hills Post AcuteLake Forest, CA 2 of 5Villa Del Sol Post AcuteBellflower, CA 3 of 5Anaheim Healthcare Center, LLCAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Bonita Hills Post AcuteLa Habra, CA 3 of 5Community Care And Rehabilitation CenterRiverside, CA 3 of 5Country Oaks Care CenterPomona, CA 3 of 5Courtyard Care CenterSan Jose, CA 3 of 5Extended Care Hospital Of RiversideRiverside, CA 3 of 5Menifee Lakes Post AcuteSun City, CA 3 of 5Mission Carmichael Healthcare CenterCarmichael, CA 3 of 5Paramount Convalescent Hosp.Paramount, CA 3 of 5Pelican Ridge Post AcuteNewport Beach, CA 3 of 5Sunset Manor Conv HospEl Monte, CA 3 of 5Vineland Post AcuteNorth Hollywood, CA 4 of 5Garden Park Care CenterGarden Grove, CA 4 of 5Las Vegas Post Acute & RehabilitationLas Vegas, NV 4 of 5Ocean View Post AcuteEscondido, CA 4 of 5Park Regency Care CenterLa Habra, CA 4 of 5Pomona Vista Care CenterPomona, CA 4 of 5Sierra View Care CenterBaldwin Park, CA 4 of 5Vista View Post AcuteVista, CA 5 of 5Alcott Rehabilitation HospitalLos Angeles, CA 5 of 5Citrus Nursing CenterFontana, CA 5 of 5Del Mar Convalescent HospitalRosemead, CA 5 of 5Excell Health Care CenterOakland, CA 5 of 5Mission Care CenterRiverside, CA

Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CHAMBERS, THOMASIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/08/2013
JOHNSON, DAVIDIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/08/2013
KNOLLS WEST POST ACUTE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/28/2025
MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2013
BELANGER, WILLIAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022
REDDY, HARIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$22.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$5.3M
Related-party expense25% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 40%Medicare 51%Other / private 9%

This home reported $5.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$555per resident / day
operating cost
$16,859per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$576per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555251. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next