Heritage Manor
610 North Garfield Avenue, Monterey Park, CA 91754 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (626) 573-3141 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $17,940 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-28)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.9% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 0.7% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.2% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.3% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 2.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.31 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.32 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
33.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 279 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 82.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 144 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 51% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 33.1%CMS range 27.9–40.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.1%CMS range 9.8–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 82.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 80.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 70.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 10.6%CMS range 7.1–13.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.71 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 95.0 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.52 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.10 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
65 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and interventions in accordance with the resident's respiratory care needs, care plan, facility policy and professional standards of practice, the physician's order and facility's policy and procedure for one of three closed record sampled residents (Resident 98) diagnosed of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a life-threatening condition where the lungs fail to deliver enough oxygen to the blood, leading to dangerously low oxygen levels in the body), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation (worsened COPD, sudden severe symptoms of a lung disease characterized by poor airflow to the lungs that results in shortness of breath, difficulty breathing and respiratory distress) and pulmonary hypertension [a condition characterized by high blood pressure (BP, the measurement of the pressure or force of blood inside the blood vessels) in the arteries of the lungs which makes the heart work harder to pump…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident 1), who was assessed at risk for falls and diagnoses of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and age-related osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones due to lack of calcium and Vitamin D) was free from falls and injury in accordance with the resident ' s care plan by failing to: 1. Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 prevented Resident 1, who was assessed as totally dependent to staff for bathing/showers, from falling in the Shower Room while sitting on the shower chair. On 11/30/2024, Resident 1 fell on her left side when the resident opened the arm rest of her shower chair while CNA 1 bent over to fix the hem (an edge that is folded over and stitched down to prevent threads coming loose) of her [CNA 1] pants. 2. Ensure CNA 1 notified Registered Nurse (RN) 1 when Resident 1 fell from the shower chair and placed the resident back on the shower chair, after the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0620 — patternNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled resident (Resident 1 and 2) received services in accordance with the facility's capabilities and available resources when the facility admitted and retained the residents requiring peritoneal dialysis (PD, a type of dialysis [a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed] that uses the lining of the abdomen {peritoneum} as a natural filter to remove waste, toxins, and extra water from the body]) services without having an established peritoneal dialysis program and the necessary services to safely provide PD care as approved by the State Agency. These deficient practices had the potential for the residents to experience complications related to PD such as infections (peritonitis, catheter exit-site infections), mechanical issues (hernias, dialysate leaks, catheter blockage), and metabolic changes like weight gain or high blood sugar that can lead to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0627 — patternEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and appropriate discharge for two of 2 sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2) who required peritoneal dialysis (PD, a type of dialysis [a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed] that uses the lining of the abdomen [peritoneum] as a natural filter to remove waste, toxins, and extra water from the body]) service. The facility admitted Residents 1 and provided PD services to the residents without obtaining license and reporting to the State Agencies since 2/2026. The facility initiated Resident 1 and 2 to discharge to the hospital on 4/29/2026 which was not the choice of the residents. The deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 and 2 being transferred to the hospital with was not their feeling displaced and reported feeling disappointed that affected their psychological wellbeing. Findings: 1.During a review of review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to 2 of 2 sampled residents ( Residents 6 and 62) who required peritoneal dialysis (PD, a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed]that uses the lining of the abdomen [peritoneum] as a natural filter to remove waste, toxins, and extra water from the body) receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice and the Federal and State Department requirements prior to providing PD Services to the residents. The facility failed to: 1.For Resident 6 failed to receive ongoing assessment and oversight before, during, and after PD treatments. In addition, no documentation on the PD logs, MAR (Medication Administration Record, and TAR (Treatment Administration Record) to indicate Resident 6's vital signs, cardiac, respiratory, and skin assessments before, during, and after PD treatments were monitored. 2. For Resident 62's the resident was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the accurate and current staffing data sheet (total number of actual hours worked by licensed [Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Vocational Nurses [LVNs], and unlicensed nurses [Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs)] ) was posted on 4/25/2026 for the 7 AM - 3 PM shift when the annual recertification survey team entered the facility on 4/25/2025 at 8:30 AM. This deficient practice had the potential to delay recognition of inadequate staffing levels, which may lead to delayed response times, unmet resident needs, and decreased supervision, particularly for residents who require assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), such as bathing, dressing, and toileting, or who require ongoing safety monitoring. This deficient practice also had the potential to prevent residents, families, and visitors from accurately assessing staff availability, which may affect their ability to raise concerns, request assistance, or make informed decisions regarding the resident's care environment. Findings: During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications (blood thinner) were monitored for medication side effects, in accordance to the resident's care plan and failed to obtain the correct safe dose for a prescribed anti nausea medication, in accordance to professional standard of practice and pharmaceutical recommendation for four of six sampled residents (Residents 3, 40, 75, and 65) by failing to: 1. The facility did not monitor Resident 3 for signs and symptoms of bleeding while receiving Eliquis (a blood thinner medication).2. The facility did not monitor Resident 40 for signs and symptoms of bleeding while receiving Eliquis. 3. The facility did not monitor Resident 75 for signs and symptoms of bleeding while receiving Brillinta (a medication that prevents blood from sticking together) and Aspirin (medication that prevent blood clot to form). 4. For Resident 65, the facility failed to include a maximum daily dose for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to store and serve food for 69 residents receiving food from the kitchen in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, and the facility's policy and procedure titled, Food Safety and Food Storage, revised 12/19/2022. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents to acquire food-borne illness (a life-threatening infection due to consuming contaminated food) from ingesting expired food. Findings: During an observation on 4/25/2026 at 8:45 AM in the kitchen with the dietary staff there were open and expired food items in the freezer as listed: One open bag full of mixed vegetables store in the freezer Ten (10) cups of expired ice cream store in the freezer Ice scoop stored inside the ice container machine During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/25/2026 at 8:45 AM with the Kitchen staff (KS 1) stated that the vegetable bag that was slightly opened was overlooked by staff and should have been disposed. KS 1 stated the ice cream cups expired on 4/24/2026 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement the facility's policy and procedure for infection control for 5 of 5 sampled residents Residents 43, 46, 62, 67 and 106. The facility failed to: 1.Resident 106's nasal canula (NC-a lightweight, flexible tube used to deliver supplemental oxygen) was properly stored when not in use to prevent contamination in accordance with Oxygen Administration facility policy. 2.Appropriately cohort Resident 62 who was on peritoneal dialysis (PD, a home-based treatment for kidney failure) with Resident 46 who had active infection with Escherichia coli Extended-Spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL E. coli, bacteria resistant to many common antibiotics, making infection harder to treat) in urine in the same room. 3. Ensure Resident 43's intravenous site (IV- catheter inserted into the vein) was labeled with a date and initialed by the registered nurse (RN) who last changed the IV site dressing. 4. Ensure Resident 67's personal items located in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain or enhanced a resident's dignity, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, for two of six sampled residents (Residents 1 and 49) by failing to: 1.Cover Resident 1's urinary collection bag (a bag where urine drains from the bladder) with a privacy bag. 2.Provide privacy to Resident 49 while being assisted after a shower. Resident 49 was left in a shower chair with no clothes or covering from the waist down in the middle of her room while the door was open exposed to the facility hallway. These deficient practices had the potential for lowering the resident's self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with included diagnoses of Dementia (a progressive stated of decline in mental abilities), lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure titled, Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response for three out of six sampled residents (Resident 1) to ensure that the residents had the call system within reach and were able to use it if desired. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of not having their needs met timely, especially during an emergency or accident. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 65's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated that Resident 65 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle wasting and atrophy (the wasting or loss of muscle tissue caused by reduced protein and increased degradation), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing). During a review of Resident 65's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 4/7/2026, the MDS indicated that Resident 65 has severely impaired cognition (the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to inform Physician 1 of the significant change in condition of one of three sample residents (Resident 38) on the morning of 4/25/2025 when Registered Nurse (RN) 3 assessed Resident 38, diagnosed with Diabetes Mellitus [DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing], with a blood pressure (the force blood pushes against the arteries; normal reading is 120/80 milliliters of mercury [mmHg, unit of measure]) of 85/50 mmHg and was drowsier than usual and RN 3 administered IV (Intravenous or administered into the vein) 5% Dextrose Normal Saline (solution with salt and glucose) without the physician's order. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 38 receiving 5% Dextrose Normal Saline for 1 hour at a rate of 200 milliliters per hour (mL/hr, unit of rate) without a physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 38 experiencing worsening hyperglycemia (high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 53 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and closed record review, the facility failed to ensure the required Notice of Proposed Transfer/Discharge (a written notification to the resident or responsible party (RP) was fully completed and sent to the Long Term Care Ombudsman (advocates for residents of nursing homes, board and care homes and assisted living facilities) for two of two sampled residents (Resident 7 and Resident 101). The required notice, which provides written information to the resident or responsible party regarding the reason for the transfer or discharge, was not completed in full before being sent to the Ombudsman. This deficient practice failed to ensure the residents' rights to have the Long Term Care Ombudsman notified and able to advocate on behalf of Resident 7 and Resident 101 regarding their proposed transfer/discharge. Findings: 1 During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated that the facility admitted Resident 7 on 9/5/2022 and readmitted Resident 7 on 4/5/2026 with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services based on Professional Standard of Practice for two of two sampled residents (Residents 38 and 43). The facility failed to: 1.For Resident 38 with diabetes (a condition of having high blood sugar) Registered Nurse (RN) 3 transcribed in a physician order to administered IV (intravenous or administered into the vein) 5% Dextrose Normal Saline (solution with salt and glucose) to the resident without a physician order. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inaccurate treatment and inappropriate IV fluid administration and result in serious complications that included hyperglycemia (high blood glucose levels) fluid overload (the body retaining and unable to remove excess fluids) or need of hospitalization. 2. For Resident 46, who had a foley catheter (a flexible tube used to drain urine from the bladder continuously into a bag) the Treatment Nurse (TXN) reinserted the foley catheter without a physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health to two of two sampled residents (Residents 6 and 65) by failing to: 1.For Resident 65, who has had weight loss, the staff failed to monitor and document the percentage of intake of nourishments/snacks to indicate if the snacks were consumed or not as ordered by the physician and recommended by the Registered Dietician. 2.For Resident 6, who required peritoneal dialysis (PD, a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) was not monitored to restrict fluid intake to 1500 milliliters (mL, unit of measure) as indicated in the Nutritional Assessment on 3/3/2026. These failures had the potential to place Resident 6 and Resident 65 to be at risk for altered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store drugs and destruct biologicals in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Medication Storage and Destruction of Unused Drugs when unknown white medication tablet was found on the floor in one of the two medication rooms. This deficient practice resulted in unsafe storage of the medication and had the potential to result in medication errors and misuse. During an observation Medication Room (MR) and concurrent interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 on [DATE] at 5:22 AM, a white round unknown medication tablet was found on the floor. LVN 2 stated she did not know what medication it was and why the tablet was on the floor. LVN 2 stated nurses should check the MRs for any loose tablets and discard medication tablet into the Medication Disposable bin to prevent medication errors. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:46 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated that nurses are required to check the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the arbitration agreement (AA, a written contract where parties agree to settle disputes privately through a neutral third party [an arbitrator] rather than in a public courtroom) was adequately explained so the resident or their responsible party (RP) could understand its terms for one of three sampled residents (Resident 65) by failing to inform Resident 65's RP that he had 30 days after signing to fully review the agreement and rescind any agreement if it was not understood at the time of admission. This deficient practice has the potential to affect Resident 65's and the resident's RP's right to make informed decisions and choices about important aspects of the resident's health, safety and welfare. Findings: During a review of Resident 65's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated that Resident 65 was admitted on [DATE], and Resident 65's RP was Family Member (FM 1). The AR indicated that Resident 65 was admitted with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light was within reach for five of five sampled residents (Resident 46, . The deficient practices had potential for Resident 46 not being able to call the facility staff to ask for help or assistance, especially during emergencies. During a review of Resident 46's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 46 on 3/22/2026 with diagnoses that included displaced fracture of base of neck of right femur (right hip fracture) and Parkinson's disease (a progressive condition that affects movement). During a review of Resident 46's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning screening tool), dated 3/26/2026, indicated Resident 46's had moderately impaired cognition (ability to understand and make decisions) and memory. The MDS indicated Resident 46 required partial/moderate assistance with eating, oral hygiene and personal hygiene, and was dependent on toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self and chair/bed-to-chair transfer. During a concurrent observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and food production practices were implemented by failing to: Dispose of one sandwich, with a use by date of 2/23/26, stored in the facility's refrigerator in the conference room. Ensure kitchen towels used to wipe food contact surfaces were stored in the sanitizer solution bucket and ensure hair nets were readily available in the conference room where food was served. Ensure temperature of Time/Temperature control for safety food (TCS foods that can support bacterial growth that can result in food borne illness unless stored, prepared and served safely) foods were not above 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The temperature of milk held for cold storage served during lunch service was measured at 52.5F. These deficient practices had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to food borne illnesses in 89 out of 93 residents who received food from the facility. Findings: During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a QA/QAPI (Quality Assurance/Quality Assurance and Performance improvement, a date driven proactive approach to improvement used to ensure services are meeting quality standards) plan was developed on how to monitored interventions put in place related to the inoperable elevator from and to the kitchen and food service in the conference room by failing to: 1. Safe and sanitary food storage and distribution practices in the conference room. 2. Staff received ongoing training and evaluations of their skills and knowledge to ensure safe food receipt and delivery procedure, safe and sanitary food distribution to residents and reduced risk of injury. 3.Food items were received and handled in a safe and sanitary manner from suppliers. This deficient practice had the potential for unsanitary and unsafe food storage and distribution practices that can result in food poisoning or foodborne illnesses (gastrointestinal infection due to consumption of contaminated food with toxins from bacteria, virus or parasites).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility failed to maintain safe and functional environment by ensuring the elevator from the kitchen was maintained in functioning condition to maintain sanitary and safe food service for all residents in the facility and staffs. As a result, resident food was carried by the staff from basement through the stairwell, food distribution and service is relocated to the conference room, food vendors leave food deliveries in the parking lot to be carried by kitchen staff through the stairwell. This deficient practice had the potential to result in unsafe and unsanitary food storage and distribution practice and place staff at risk of injuries.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Assistant Administrator (AADM) and Maintenance Supervisor (MS) on 2/24/2026 at 10:30AM, the facility conference room was being used by the facility as a food distribution and serving area for the residents. During the same observation on 2/24/2026 at 10:30AM, in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary diabetic care and services for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control), by failing to coordinate services for diabetic care and management for Resident 1 that included checking blood sugar with an accu-check machine (checking blood sugar level with the use of a machine, by pricking the finger and collecting a small blood sample on a test strip, which would be read by the machine) in accordance with Physician 1's H&P treatment plan. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 experiencing hyperglycemia (a condition where there's too much glucose in the blood) placing Resident 1 at risk for various serious complications, in ketoacidosis (DKA, a complication of diabetes in which acids build up in the blood to levels that can be life-threatening), dehydration (a condition occurs when the body loses more fluids…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive resident centered care plan (a formal process that correctly identifies existing needs and recognizes a resident's potential needs or risks to achieve healthcare outcomes) in accordance with the facility's care plan policy for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), by failing to ensure the diabetes mellitus care plan initiated on 7/15/2025 was appropriate. This deficient practice had the potential to result in delay or lack of delivery of care and services to Resident 1, which could affect the resident's overall wellbeing. Cross Reference to F684, F726, F756 Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar), encounter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDSN, a licensed nurse who specializes in the assessment and documentation of patient health data in long-term care) 1 completed the annual licensed nurse competency for 2023 and 2024. This deficient practice caused an increased risk for improper resident assessments, inadequate documentation, and could negatively impact the quality of care to the residents which could lead to hospitalization or death. Cross Referenced to F656, F684, F756 Findings: During an interview on 8/14/2025 at 10:30 AM, MDSN 1 stated she did not know the facility's policy and procedure for comprehensive care plans (a detailed, individualized document that outlines all aspects of a patient's medical, emotional, and daily living needs). During an interview on 8/14/2025 at 12:30 PM, MDSN 2 stated developing residents' comprehensive care plans is one of the tasks of the MDS nurses. MDSN 2 stated MDS nurses should know the facility's policy for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a comprehensive medication regimen review (MRR, a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication) in accordance with the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 not having medication for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control) since admission on [DATE], which lead to Resident 1's hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) on 8/9/2025. Cross Referenced to F656, F684, F726 Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. During a review of Resident 94 ' s AR, the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 94 on 1/31/2025, with diagnoses including hypertension (a long-term medical condition in which the blood pressure in the arteries is persistently elevated), and dysphagia (difficulty or discomfort in swallowing). During a review of Resident 94 ' s H&P, dated 2/2/2025 indicated, Resident 94 had the mental capacity to make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 94's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated the cognitive (the ability to think and process information) skills for daily decisions making was moderately impaired, and dependent on staff for the activities of daily living. During a review of Resident 14's AR, the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 14 on 10/21/2021, with diagnoses including hypertension (a long-term medical condition in which the blood pressure in the arteries is persistently elevated), and dementia (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life) During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the two of two dietary staff (Dietary Manager and Facility Cook) had appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service based on resident assessments, individual plans of care of the 30 residents who were prescribed with pureed diet (diet with food that has been blended, mashed, or strained until it's smooth and free of lumps, like applesauce or mashed potatoes, often used for those with difficulty chewing or swallowing) and were served pureed food that was pasty and thick in texture by failing to: 1. Ensure the Facility [NAME] reviewed and followed the recipe to ensure adequate measurement of thickener powder (powder like starch used to thicken the texture of food) were mixed when preparing the pureed food on 3/26/2025. 2. Ensure the Dietary Manager follow the pureed recipe and oversee the Facility [NAME] when preparing puree food for the residents on 3/26/2025. The deficient practices had put the residents at risk poor nutrition to weigh loss or gain,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and safe food handling in accordance with the facility ' s policy and procedures by failing to ensure: 1. The scoop used for scooping flour was not on the top of the flour container and was stored in a plastic bag when not in use to limit exposure to potential contamination. 2. The dietary staff correctly conduct the calibration (correlating the readings of an instrument with those of a standard to check the instrument's accuracy) of the food thermometer used to readily identify the proper temperatures of the food being served. These deficient practices had the potential to result in cross contamination and food-borne illnesses (food poisoning) of the residents with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and fever and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization. and put residents at risk for foodborne illnesses (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins). Findings: 1. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. On 3/26/2025 at 3:09 PM, while onsite at the facility, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) an Immediate Jeopardy situation (IJ, a situation in which the provider ' s noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death of a resident) was identified and called regarding the facility ' s failure to notify the physician regarding significant changes in Resident 98 ' s respiratory conditions and provide the necessary respiratory care and monitoring. 3. LVN 1 who was in charge of Resident 98 on 2/12/25 to 2/13/25 did not implemented Resident 98 ' s Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a portable medical order that communicates a patient's wishes for end-of-life care and treatment interventions) according to the resident ' s preferences. During an interview on 3/26/2025 at 7 AM with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated, he was the charge nurse that took care of Resident 98 from 11 PM on 2/12/2025 until the resident expired on 2/13/2025 at 5:59 AM. LVN 1 stated, Resident 98 was alert,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat resident with dignity and respect by ensuring one of five sampled residents (Resident 78) by receive meal at the same time as other residents who were dining in the dining room during lunch time on 3/25/2025. The deficient practice resulted in Resident 78 reported feeling disrespected and frustrated when watching other residents eating and completing their meals in front of him. Findings: During a review of Resident 78's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 78 on 11/18/2024 and readmitted him on 1/2/2025 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung [an organ located in the chest and provide gas exchange for the body] diseases that cause ongoing damage to the airway and lungs, leading to difficulty breathing) and pulmonary edema (a condition where fluid accumulates in the lungs, making it difficult to breathe). During a review of Resident 78's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Notification of Changes, revised [DATE], its professional standards of practice and the physician ' s order for one of one sampled resident (Resident 98), who had a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a life-threatening condition where the lungs fail to deliver enough oxygen to the blood, leading to dangerously low oxygen levels in the body), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation (COPD, sudden severe symptoms of a lung disease characterized by poor airflow to the lungs that results in shortness of breath, difficulty breathing and respiratory distress) and pulmonary hypertension [a condition that affects the blood vessels (the network of tubes through which blood is pumped around the body) in the lungs] by failing to ensure LVN 1 immediately notified the physician when CNA 1 reported to LVN 1 that Resident 98 was experiencing labored breathing with his oxygen saturation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During a review of Resident 27's AR, the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 27 on 2/25/2016 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included aphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate) following cerebral infarction (or ischemic stroke, occurs when the blood supply to part of the brain is blocked or reduced), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2 - condition that results in too much sugar circulating in the blood). During a review of Resident 27's History and Physical, dated 11/20/2024, indicated Resident 27 did not have the capacity to understand and make decision. During a review of Resident 27's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 27's cognition (ability to think, remember, and reason with no difficulty) was severely impaired and was dependent (helper does all of the effort) in the ability to walk at least 10 feet in the room. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/28/2025 at 9:50 AM with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 6 in Resident 27's room,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool) entries were accurate and reflects resident's status for one of three sampled residents (Resident 99) who was discharged home with home health services. The MDS was incorrectly coded as a transfer to a hospital, which does not reflect the actual discharge disposition of the resident who was discharged to home. This failure resulted in inaccurate documentation in the resident's medical record could impact continuity of care, facility reporting accuracy, and regulatory compliance. Incorrect discharge coding may also affect quality measures, reimbursement, and tracking of resident outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 99's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 99 on 1/27/2025 with diagnoses that included hypertension (a long-term medical condition in which the blood pressure in the arteries is persistently elevated) and hyperlipidemia (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of four sampled residents (Resident 10) who had an impaired vision and needed eyeglasses to improve his vision and to meet the residents ' needs, resident ' s goals, and preferences. The deficient practices have the potential to delay necessary care and services to assist with the Resident 10 ' s vision that and affect resident ' s quality of life. Findings: During an observation on 3/25/25 at 12:11pm, Resident 10 was awake watching Television in the room with a pair of eyeglasses was on the table. Resident 10 stated he ' s waiting for the new pair of eyeglasses to be sent to him because the old pair doesn ' t work well for him anymore, which he held for about a year. Resident 10 stated the optometrist (a healthcare professional for routine eye and vision care) came to facility about a month ago and checked his vision. Resident 10 stated everything has become blurry,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled resident (Resident 11) was provided care and services to prevent skin pressure injury (PI-pressure injury skin damage due to unrelieved pressure or sheer or friction to the skin). Resident 11 developed Stage 2 PI (partial-thickness loss of skin, presenting as a shallow open sore or wound) on left first metatarsal (big toe) that developed in the facility and on 12/31/24 that progressed to Stage 3 P1 (Full-thickness loss of skin. Dead and black tissue may be visible) on 3/4/25. Resident 11 ' s new footwear was not assessed and evaluated to determine if the shoes was effective to prevent worsening or development of new or old pressure injury. This deficiency had the potential for Resident 11's left first metatarsal pressure injury to worsen and experience pain and infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 11's admission record (AR) indicated that Resident 11 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of five percent or (5%) or less during medication pass for one of four observed residents (Residents 52) in which three (3) medication errors were identified out of 29 opportunities that yielded a cumulative error rate of 10.34 %. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) checked the heart rate of Resident 52 prior to the administration of Metoprolol tartrate (medication that lowers blood sugar level) and Amlodipine (medication ordered to manage hypertension [HTN - elevated blood pressure]). 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) provided food during medication administration of Metoprolol and Metformin HCL (medication given to lower blood sugar level) ordered by the physician. These deficient practices had the potential to result in ineffective managed hypertension and diabetes and may cause a harmful significant drop in the heart rate, blood pressure, hypoglycemia (low blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of four residents (Resident 52) was free from significant medication errors as indicated in the physician ' s order, pharmacy recommendation and facility's policy and procedures by failing to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 failed to check the heart rate of Resident 52 prior to the administration of Metoprolol tartrate (medication given to lower the blood pressure) and Amlodipine (medication ordered to manage Resident 52's hypertension [HTN - elevated blood pressure]). This failure places the resident at risk for adverse effects, including bradycardia (low heart rate), hypotension (low blood pressure), dizziness, increasing the risk of falls, and cause the heart to stop that could lead to hospitalization or death. Findings: During a review of Resident 52's admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/5/2022 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM: long-term…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for one of two sampled residents (Resident 47) who had difficulty swallowing was served pureed diet (a food item that has been blended, mixed, or processed into a smooth and uniform texture) that was too thick in texture. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 47 and other residents with difficulty swallowing to be at increased risk for choking (happens when something blocks the airway, preventing a person from breathing properly, often due to food or other objects getting stuck in the throat) and aspiration (accidentally inhaling food, liquid, or other material into the lungs instead of the stomach, which can lead to complications like pneumonia [a severe lung infection]) that could lead to death. Finings: During a review of Resident 47's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 47 on 10/3/2019 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment for six out of 20 sampled residents(Residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 5) when a rusty and dirty commode was found in shared bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] and 5. This failure resulted in unsanitary environment and potential to lower the residents' quality of life. Findings: During an observation on 3/25/2025 at 9:52 AM in the shared the restroom between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 5, a dirty and rusty commode was observed. During an interview on 3/25/2025 at 10 AM with Housekeeper (HK) 1, HK 1 stated, she was not aware and did not receive any report that the commode was dirty and rusty. HK 1 stated, HK 1 supposed to check all equipment and report to the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) to replace dirty and rusty commode. HK 1 stated, she could not recall if she checked shared restrooms between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 5 to make sure all equipment was clean and functional. During a concurrent observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances verbalized by one of two sampled residents' (Resident 1) responsible party (RP) apprised of progress towards resolution. In addition, the facility failed to issue a written grievance decision to the resident and RP, in accordance with the facility's policy on Grievance/Concern. This deficient practice increased the risk for negative psychosocial impact on Resident 1's quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Metabolic encephalopathy (a condition in which the brain does not function properly due to an underlying metabolic imbalance),acute respiratory failure with hypoxia(a condition when the body doesn't get enough oxygen). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical [H&P] dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an injury of unknown source, immediately, but not later than two (2) hours after the allegation was made at 8:30 AM and reported the allegation to the Department of Public Health (DPH) at 1:23 PM (five [5] hours after the allegation), when Resident 2 was found having ecchymosis (a bruise) to both arms and a skin tear to the left forearm, for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident 2), in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure [P&P] titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. This deficient practice had the potential to result in placing the resident at risk for undetected elder neglect or abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/8/2024 with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), anemia (a condition where the body did not have enough healthy red blood cells), and lack of coordination. During a review of Resident 2 ' s History and Physical (H&P) dated 10/10/2024, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility ' s policy and procedure titled Clean Dressing Change to prevent infection during wound care of the pressure ulcer (a skin injury resulting from prolonged unrelieve pressure in the body). Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) failed to change gloves and wash hands after touching a soiled wound dressing during wound care for one of three sample residents (Resident 2) who had Stage 4 pressure ulcer (skin injury that involves full-thickness tissue loss that exposes bone, tendon, or muscle). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 2 to develop severe wound infection, pain and could lead to delayed healing process and a decline in the resident ' s wellbeing. Findings: During a review of the admission record indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes (a disease in which your blood glucose, or blood sugar, levels are too…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility ' s infection surveillance tracking and heighten the facility ' s surveillance activities for coronavirus illness during periods of transmission to prevent and control the spread of Covid-19 (Coronavirus, a severe respiratory illness caused by a virus and spread from person to person) in accordance with current standards and the facility ' s policies and procedures. The facility failed to develop an effective line listing (a table/list that summarizes information about cases [possible, probable or confirmed] associated with an outbreak) for 20 out of a facility census of 98 who tested positive for Covid 19. As a result, Resident 1 residing in Room A with a positive Covid 19 result was mistakenly moved to Room B to share a room with Residents 3 and 5 who were negative with Covid-19 during the facility ' s testing on 6/30/2024. These deficient practices had the potential to spread the Covid 19 to other residents,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient monitoring and supervision to one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) who eloped (the act of leaving a facility premises or a safe area without notifying anyone) from the facility. The facility found out that Resident 1 was missing on 4/20/24 at around 8 PM when a family member (FAM 1) called the facility to inform a staff that the resident went home. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 and other residents who are at risk for elopement to be exposed to danger or harm that could lead to injury or death. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted the resident on 3/27/24 with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood, not because of a head injury) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems). A review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical assessment, dated 3/28/24, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 3 was seated during meals times while assisting feeding for three of three sampled residents (Residents 25, 33, and 388). This failure had the potential for Residents 25, 33 and 388 to experience loss of dignity, self-esteem and respect. Findings: 1. During a meal observation on 4/9/2024 at 12:42 pm at Resident 25's bedside, Resident 25 was observed sitting in bed while CNA 3 was observed standing on the left side of the bed (right side of the resident), feeding lunch to Resident 25. A review of Resident 25's admission Record indicated Resident 25 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), aphasia (an impairment of language affecting the ability to express or understand speech), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans (a document that outlines the facility's plan to provide personalized care to a resident based on the resident's needs) for three of three sampled residents (Resident 12, 2, and 31). 1. Resident 12 who had oxygen therapy in accordance with the facility's protocol for Oxygen Administration. 2. Resident 2 who was admitted with diagnoses of sepsis (a potentially life-threatening condition that arises when the body's response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs) and pneumonia (a severe infection in your lungs). 3. Resident 31's preference to receieve prescribed medication at different times from the usual medication scheduled times at the facility. These deficient practices had a potential for Resident 12 not to receive or receive delayed necessary interventions during oxygen therapy, Resident 2 to have inadequate and incomplete provision of care and treatment which would put her at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 81) was assessed, monitored, and evaluated for skin breakdown related to MASD (Moisture-associated skin damage caused by prolonged exposure to various sources of moisture, including urine or stool, perspiration, mucus, saliva, and their contents. MASD is characterized by inflammation of the skin, occurring with or without erosion [gradual destruction of tissue] or skin infection) and fungal infection (irritation or swelling of the skin cause by overgrowth of fungus) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure and resident's plan of care. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident 81's plan of care was implemented to assess and document status of wound perimeter; wound bed and healing progress and report improvements and declines to medical doctor and resident. 2. The Treatment Nurse (TN) assessed, monitored and evaluated Resident 81 ' s skin weekly for as needed for size, appearance,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 81), was assessed, provided pain management and interventions to relieve severe pain in the perianal (body area near the anus), perineal (body area between the anus and vaginal area) area due to severe MASD (Moisture Associated Skin Damage characterized by skin inflammation and damage of the outer layer of the skin resulting from prolong exposure moisture from to feces, urines and perspiration) and fungal dermatitis (irritation or swelling of the skin due to overgrowth of fungus) during wound care, hygiene care or when sitting on the chair for a long period of time as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure and as ordered by the physician. This failure resulted in Resident 81's having unrelieved severe pain and verbalized feeling sad that the facility allowed her to suffer from pain, which prevented her from moving around and attending activities and potentially caused a decline in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a performance review for eight of nine (9) Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) based on the outcome of the review for each of the CNAs. The CNAs did not have a completed Annual Core Clinical Competencies (ACCC, an assessment and training on the CNAs the ability to perform clinical nursing care). This failure had a potential to result in the facility ' s CNAs not able to provide quality care to the resident ' s population based on the Facility Assessment (an assessment to make decisions about direct care staff needs, as well capabilities to provide services to the residents). Findings: During an interview on 4/11/24 at 9:19 am with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated, all CNAs were supposed to have yearly clinical skills competency check to assess for their competency and to refresh their knowledge on how to provide appropriate care to the residents. The DSD stated, she just started the DSD position three months ago and the previous DSD did not use CNA Core Clinical Competencies checklist for any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview and record review the facility failed to implement the facility's policy and procedure on food storage and in accordance with professional standards of practice for food service safety by failing to: 1. Label and date of when it was opened or used by a brown powder in a clear plastic container, the chicken bouillon (ingredients used for seasoning). 2. Label a clear plastic container containing rice found in the refrigerator, with the use-by-date (the date the food product could be safely consumed). 3. Label a clear plastic container containing sliced peaches found in the refrigerator with the use-by date. 4. Label a clear plastic container containing tofu found in the refrigerator with the use-by-date. 5. Label a clear plastic container containing green peas found in the refrigerator with the use-by date. These deficient practices had the potential to result in food contamination or growth of microorganisms (disease causing organism) that could cause foodborne illness (food poisoning or food illness due to pathogens (organism that cause illness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Complete the facility's Surveillance Data Collection Form (SDC - a form used by the facility to indicate if the resident met the criteria for the use of antibiotic [medication used to treat infection]), a part of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program (protocols and a system in the facility to monitor antibiotic use) prior to the administration of antibiotic for one of three sampled residents (Resident 30). 2. Implement the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program (a facility policy that uses protocols and a monitoring system for antibiotic [medication used to kill bacteria and to treat infections]) use by not conducting a surveillance (close observation) and monitoring prior to antibiotic use. for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2). These deficient practices had the potential for Residents 30 and Resident 2 to receive unneccessary or inappropriate antibiotics, incomplete monitoring during antibiotic therapy, and to develop…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: provide reasonable accommodation of needs for two of two residents (Resident 30 and 81). 1. Provide reasonable accommodation of needs for one of two sampled residents (Resident 30) by failing to ensure to place resident's call light within reach. 2. Use a communication board, tool or ask assistance from a translator when communicating to one of one sampled resident (Resident 81), who speaks a foreign language. These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 30 not to receive or have a delay in provision of care and necessary services for the resident's well-being, and resulted in Resident 81's verbalized feeling confused and frustrated when the staff communicated in a language that she did not understand. These deficient practices also had the potential for Resiednt 81 not to receive immediate or appropriate care and necessary interventions for her well-being. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 30's admission Record (Face Sheet)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the physician and responsible party was notified for one of one resident (Resident 81) with significant change of condition (COC) related to severe MASD (damage of the skin caused by prolonged exposure to various sources of moisture) and fungal skin infection (skin disease irritation, swellingness caused by an overgrowth of a fungus) in the perineal (the area extending from the anus to the vulva in the female and to the scrotum in the male) and perianal (the tissues surrounding the anus) area. This deficient practice Resident 81 developed worsened skin breakdown, fungal infection that led to more pain, discomfort and recurrent sepsis (a life threatning infection of the blood). Crossed reference with F684 and F697. Findings: A review of Resident 81's admission Record, indicated Resident 81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a disease when blood sugar is too high) with hyperglycemia (high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 76) receives appropriate care and services to prevent urine in the Foley catheter (a flexible tube used to empty the bladder and collect urine in a drainage bag) from entering back into the bladder and cause urinary tract infections (an infection due to a disease causing organisms that enters the bladder and the kidney). Resident 76 was observed with Foley catheter tubing kinked (sharp twist or bent) on the bedrail and causing the urine to flow back to the bladder and not flow freely into the drainage bag as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure and Resident 76's plan of care. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 76 to experience recurrent urinary tract infection and negatively affect Resident 76s quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 76's admission Record (AR), dated 4/11/2024, indicated Resident 76 was admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's policy and procedure on Care and Treatment of Feeding Tubes, for one of one sampled resident (Resident 72). The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident 72's gastrostomy tube (tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach) was labeled with the date when the tubing will be changed and/or the last time it was changed. This failure had the potential to cause complications to Resident 72's gastrostomy tube. Findings: During a review of Resident 72's admission Record (AR), dated 4/11/2024, indicated Resident 72 was admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including gastrostomy ( (an opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall, made surgically for the introduction of food) infection, other complication of gastrostomy, sepsis (potentially life-threatening condition that arises when the body's response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 12) had nasal canula and humidifier bottle dated and changed weekly in accordance with the facility's protocol for Oxygen Administration. 2. Ensure one of three residents (Resident 59) had a plastic storage bag for oxygen equipment changed weekly per facility's standard of practice. This failure had a potential to result in Resident 12 and Resident 59 using contaminated (the presence of an infectious agents- bacteria, viruses, microbes) oxygen equipment leading to a possible respiratory infection (an infection of parts of the body involved in breathing, such as the sinuses, throat, airways or lungs), sepsis (severe infection in the blood) including pneumonia (an infection that affects one or both lungs). Findings: 1. A review of Resident 12's admission Record, dated 4/11/24, indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the attending physician failed to take an active role in supervising the total program of care, including medications and treatments, and a decision about the continued appropriateness of the resident's current medical regimen for one of one sample resident (Resident 81), in accordance with the facility policy and procedure on Physician Visits and Physician Delegation. The facility failed to ensure Resident 81's attending physician: 1. Physically assess, evaluate and document the resident's skin condition during admission and during other physician ' s visits for Resident 81 with severe MASD (damage of the skin caused by prolonged exposure to various sources of moisture), fungal infection (skin disease caused by an overgrowth of a fungus) and dermatitis (irritation or swelling of the skin). 2. Assess and evaluate Resident 81 ' s skin condition before ordering a skin treatment to ensure the accurate diagnosis. 3. Assess and provide a medication regimen for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that two of two sampled residents (Residents 2 and 50), who were at risk for bleeding and bruising were free of unnecessary medication while receiving blood thinners by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 2 had adequate monitoring for bleeding and bruising while receiving Plavix (a medication that prevents platelets [a type of blood cell] in your blood from clumping together to form unwanted blood clots). 2. Resident 50 had routine laboratory test ordered to monitor the resident for complications of Aspirin (used to prevent blood cells called platelets from clumping together to form unwanted blood clots) and Eliquis (medication that decreases the clotting ability of the blood and helps to prevent harmful clots from forming) such as bleeding. These failures had the potential for Resident 2 and Resident 50 to experience side effects or adverse effects (undesired harmful effects) related to anticoagulant such as bleeding and/or bruising that were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medication error rate was less than five percent (%). During the medication administration observation, four medications out of 30 total medications administered and opportunities contributed to an overall medication error rate of 13.33 % affecting three of eight residents observed for medication administration (Resident 37, 28, and 69). The medication errors noted were as follows: 1. The medication nurse attempted to administer Calcitriol (medication to treats low calcium level) and Folic Acid (medication is used to treat low blood level) without checking the expiration date on the bottle for Resident 37. 2. The medication nurse administered Metoprolol Tartrate (medication used to lower blood pressure) without offering food as ordered by the physician for Resident 28. 3. The medication nurse administered Metoprolol Succinate (medication to lower the blood pressure) without offering food as order by the physician for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed provide documented evidence that two of three sampled residents (Residents 53 and 390) were offered or declined (refused) the influenza (flu- results in severe infection of the lungs) vaccine (a substance used to stimulate immunity to a particular infectious disease administered via injection) annually (every year). This deficient practice placed Residents 53 and 390 at a higher risk of acquiring and transmitting the flu to other residents and staffs that could result in a widespread infection in the facility. Findings: A review of the facility's Resident Immunization Record dated 2/6/2024, indicated Resident 53 and Resident 390 declined the flu vaccine for the flu season of 2023-2024 (October to March). 1. A review of Resident 53's admission Record indicated Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hyperthyroidism (when the thyroid gland makes too much thyroid hormone, resulting in a rapid heartbeat and an increased rate of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure that employee's personal item was not stored in the one of two medication rooms (Med room [ROOM NUMBER]) at Nursing Station 2. 2. Ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 6), was maintained with sanitary environment by failing to timely clean up Resident 6's bedside commode with feces and urine. These deficient practices had the potential for cross contamination leading to infection and had a potential to result in a negative effect on Resident 6's overall well-being. Findings: 1. During the inspection of the medication room in Nursing Station 2 with a Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1), on 4/10/24 at 12:23 PM, a black colored jacket was observed hanging on the back of door of the medication room. RN 1 stated the jacket should not be there. RN 1 further stated that employees have a lounge to store their personal belongings. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 4/10/24 at 3:28 pm, the DON stated that personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed implement the facility ' s policy and procedure for infection control by failing to ensure the facility staffs performs hand hygiene (hand washing or use sanitizing agent to eliminate disease causing organisms) for five of 5 sampled residents (Residents 5, 6,7,8 and 9). 1. After contact and caring for Resident 5 and Resident 8. 2. Before and after dispensing the fresh and old water in a water pitcher between Resident 6, 7 ,8, and 9. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the wide spread of infection (a process when a microorganism, such as bacteria, fungi, or a virus, enters a person's body and causes harm) in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 5 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 5 on 2/26/2024 with diagnoses that included immunodeficiency (the body fail to protect itself adequately from infection, due to the absence or insufficiency of some component process or substance) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control surveillance tracking log to ensure that facility staff members who were possible close contacts (one who has shared the same indoor airspace with someone with COVID-19 for a total of 15 minutes or more over a 24-hour period) while they were infectious to 13 of 13 sampled residents with confirmed Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19; an infectious disease) infection for the facility's current COVID 19 outbreak that started with the first positive resident on 11/8/2023. This failure had the potential to result in the further spread of COVID-19 amongst the facility's residents and staff. allows for the facility to become quickly and efficiently aware of other positive residents and staff. Findings: During a concurrent initial observation of the facility and interview with the Infection Preventionist (IPN), on 11/21/2023 at 9:42 AM, the IP stated the facility currently had a total of 92 residents in-house with 11 total positive residents for COVID-19. The IP stated the first resident residing in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of five sampled residents (Resident 6) out of the 92 residents residing at the facility, was educated, and offered a Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19; an infectious disease) vaccine, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. This failure resulted in the resident contracting COVID-19 during his stay at the facility. Findings: During a concurrent initial observation of the facility and interview with the Infection Preventionist (IPN), on 11/21/2023 at 9:42 AM, the IP stated the facility currently had a total of 92 residents in-house with 11 total positive residents for COVID-19. The IP stated the first resident residing in the facility that was confirmed as COVID 19 positive was on 11/8/2023. A review of Resident 6's Facesheet indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of interstitial pulmonary disease (a large group of disorders which cause scarring of lung tissue) and pneumonia (lung…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow and implement the resident ' s fall risk care plan that indicated to follow facility fall protocol (system of rules or accepted behavior that staff should follow in certain situations) to prevent further accidents and injury for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who had a recent fall in 10/22/2023, when facility staff failed to: 1. Report, investigate, and review any accidents or incidents that occur or allegedly occur, on facility property and may involve or allegedly involve a resident, in accordance with the facility ' s policy and procedures titled Incidents and Accidents. There was no report endorsed from the previous night shift to the morning shift licensed nurse on 10/22/2023, when Resident 1 was found with a swollen right eyelid with bluish discoloration and swollen cheek. The facility ' s Registered Nurse (RN 2) and interdisciplinary team did not investigate immediately by interviewing the resident, assigned facility staff,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$17,940 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $17,940 — penalty dated 2025-03-28
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HERITAGE MANOR HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/11/1996 |
| HERITAGE MONTEREY ASSOCIATES LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/11/2025 |
| JOHNSON, FRANK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/24/1995 |
| SUN MAR MANAGEMENT SERVICES | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/12/1989 |
| DEHGHANMANESH, ADRIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| FARRALES, MARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| KOCHEK, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| LAI, EN MING | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2015 |
| OXFORD, MICHEAL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/03/2022 |
| SALAMA, OMAR AHMED | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/07/2022 |
| TANTAMCO, REMEDIOS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/1999 |
| CIBC BANK USA | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055989. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.