Mountain View Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 106 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 111 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 54.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.40 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.56 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0826 — isolated
  Provide specialized rehabilitative services by qualified personnel, when ordered for a resident by a doctor.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that rehabilitation services were rendered in accordance with federal regulations for one of two sampled residents (Resident 48), when Resident 48 received physical therapy (PT- a treatment focused on improving movement, mobility, and physical function) and occupational therapy (OT- a therapy aimed at helping individuals perform daily activities and improve functional independence) services without a physician's order. This failure had the potential to result in uncoordinated and ineffective care, which could negatively impact Resident 48's rehabilitation and overall treatment plan. Findings: During a review of Resident 48's admission Record (clinical record with demographic information), the admission Record indicated, Resident 48 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of acute pulmonary edema (condition where fluid suddenly builds up in the lungs, making it difficult to breathe), and muscle weakness. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safeguard residents' confidential information for one of three sampled residents (Resident 50) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 4) left the computer screen containing Resident 50's medical information unattended and visible to others on June 4, 2025. This failure resulted in Resident 50's clinical records to be exposed to anyone and had the potential for an unauthorized person to access the information. Findings: During a review of Resident 50's admission Record (patient demographics), the admission Record indicated Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, fibromyalgia (a chronic disorder characterized by widespread pain and other symptoms such as fatigue, muscle stiffness, and insomnia), cardiomegaly (a condition where the heart is larger than normal), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the respiratory system fails to adequately oxygenate the blood). During an observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary and safe environment for one of three residents (Resident 2) on enhanced barrier precaution (EBP - Enhanced Barrier Precautions, infection control measures, specifically focused on reducing the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs)) when a License Vocational Nurse (LVN 3) did not perform hand hygiene after contact with Resident 2's foley catheter (a thin, flexible tube used to drain urine from the bladder). This failure had the potential for cross contamination and infection (the process by which bacteria or other microorganisms are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another, with harmful effect) which can jeopardize the health and safety of Resident 2. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (contains patient demographics), the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the post fall protocol was implemented in accordance with the facility ' s policy and procedure for one of three residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls, when the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT ( a group of healthcare professionals from different disciplines working towards a common goal for a resident) did not conduct a review of Resident 1 ' s fall which occurred on October 23, 2024. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to be at risk of further falls which could increase Resident 1 ' s risk of injuries. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record (a document that gives a summary of resident's information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that include Muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, repeated falls. During an observation and interview on October 28, 2024, at 12:56 PM with Resident 1, in Resident 1 ' s room, Resident 1 was eating in bed, with the head…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) was free from misappropriation (deliberate misplacement or wrongful use of a resident ' s belongings without consent) of property when Resident 1 ' s debit card was used by the facility Business Office Manager to pay for Resident 1 outstanding balance rather than for Resident 1 ' s personal necessities like clothing and shoes as indicated in the agreement with the bank. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 ' s personal needs not being med and further misappropriation of Resident ' s property. Findings: During an interview on October 28, 2024, at 1:07 PM, with Resident 1. Resident 1 acknowledged that he gave the facility permission to use his debit card to cover personal expenses like clothing and shoes. During a review of Resident 1 ' s clinical records, the face sheet (contains demographic information) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess resident medication and report to physician when one of three sample resident (Resident 1) did not receive medication for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (Type 2 DM - a chronic disease that causes high levels of blood sugar) from August 11, 2024, until September 12, 2024. This failure had the potential to jeopardize the health and well-being of Resident 1 who is medically compromised. Findings: During review of Resident 1 ' s admission record (It contains important information about the patient such as their personal details, the reason for their admission, and their medical history), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that include Type 2 DM. During an interview on October 15, 2024, at 2:31 PM, with the License Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), the LVN 1 stated resident 1 did not receive Metformin (a medication that treats type 2 DM) from August 11, 2024, until the day it was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to adhere to its Medicare denial process policy when it did not promptly notify one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) about the Skilled Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN: CMS -10055) This document provides information to the patient so they can decide whether or not to get the care that may not be paid for Medicare. Additionally, Resident 1 did not receive timely notification about the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMC)which is a notice that a Medicare provider or health plan must give to beneficiaries at least two days before covered services end, along with information on how to request an expedited appeal, as the coverage was coming to an end. This failure resulted in Resident 1 ' s representative not being promptly informed of her appeal rights and financial liability for services no longer covered by Medicare. Findings: During a review of the facility-provided document tiled Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage, it was noted that the effective date of coverage for skilled nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure to provide care and services for residents and ensure call lights are answered in a timely manner for two of three sampled residents (Residents 1 & 2). This failure has the potential to jeopardize the health and safety of clinically compromised Residents (Residents 1 & 2) when their requests for assistance with activities of daily living were not responded to promptly. Findings: During the review of Resident 1 ' s admission record (It contains important information about the patient such as their personal details, the reason for their admission, and their medical history), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included abnormalities of gait and mobility (a change in walking pattern that can be caused by injury, disease, or neurological issues), shortness of breath (the feeling of unable to breathe normally or feeling suffocated). During interview and observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff followed safe Infection control practices when: 1. Three staff members, one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1), the Activities Director (AD), and the Infection Preventionist (IP), were wearing acrylic nails longer than the tip of the fingers, on June 11, 2024. 2. One resident's (Resident 35) urinary catheter bag (a bag connected to a flexible tube inserted into the bladder and collects urine), was on the floor, on June 13, 2024. 3. One resident's (Resident 33's) urinary catheter tubing (the tubing which connects an indwelling urinary catheter to a urinary drainage bag) was dragging on the floor, on June 11, 2024. These failures had the potential to result in cross-contamination (spread of bacteria) causing serious infections to 42 vulnerable residents. Findings: 1. During an observation on June 11, 2024, at 10:25 AM, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1), CNA 1 was performing care to one resident while wearing long…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer were maintained in safe operating condition when both the fridge and the freezer were identified to not be operating correctly and unable to maintain acceptable temperatures on June 10, 2024. This failure had the potential for food spoilage and increased risk for foodborne illness (illness caused by eating contaminated food) for all 42 residents who received food from the facility's kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on June 10, 2024, at 9:43 AM, with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), in the facility's walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer, both the fridge and freezer felt like they were at room temperature and the facility had removed the thermometers. The facility had food stored in both the fridge and the freezer. The DSS stated the facility's walk-in refrigerator, and walk-in freezer were identified to not be working at 4:00 AM on June 10, 2024, and had broken sometime overnight. During a record review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $333K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA