Monterey Park Conv Hosp
416 N Garfield Ave, Monterey Park, CA 91754 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 89 certified beds · (626) 280-0280 Medicare & Medicaid certified
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (11% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.5% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.9% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.8% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 1.6% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.6% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.30 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.22 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 180 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 71.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 103 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.67 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.3%CMS range 33.0–48.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 7.3–13.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 71.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 71.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 63.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.6%CMS range 6.4–14.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.78 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 89 beds and averages 85.1 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.17 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.33 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 11% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food handling procedures and to maintain the food service area in a clean and sanitary manner in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) when: The clear container of mashed potatoes was not closed properly.The food blender (Blender 1) pitcher had a lingering vegetable smell, and the top cover was peeling off and with food residue.The classic peanut butter jar had peanut butter smeared on the outside of the jar's red lid.The can opener had dry crusted food residue.A bag containing beef patties, cinnamon rolls, and chocolate chip cookies was torn, exposing its contents and the label on the bag was unreadable.The food grater had dry food residue.Blender 2 with a gray plastic insert paddle was chipped, calcified, and had dried food residue. These deficient practices have the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents, which could place the residents at risk for developing foodborne illness ([food poisoning] with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures for two (2) of 2 sampled residents (Residents 9 and 13), reviewed for bowel and bladder, as indicated on the facility policy by failing to ensure:1. Certified Nursing Assistant 7 (CNA 7) performed hand hygiene (cleaning hands to prevent germs) after doffing (take off) gloves when providing incontinence (incontinent- a person is unable to voluntarily control their bladder or bowels) care for Resident 9 and before repositioning the resident and touching clean bed sheets.2. CNA 8 doff gloves and performed hand hygiene after providing incontinent care to Resident 13 and before repositioning Resident 13 and touching clean bed sheets.These failures had the potential to result in an increased risk for the spread of bacteria, viruses and pathogens (harmful microorganisms) to the residents, visitors and staff.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 9's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the call light device (one of the major communication technologies that link nursing home staff to the needs of residents) was within reach (an arm's length) of one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 78) reviewed for call devices under the environment care area . This failure had the potential to cause a delay in care for Resident 78 and prevent the resident from receiving the necessary care and services, which could lead to illness or serious injury.Findings: During a review of Resident 78 's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia (a condition caused by brain damage or spinal cord injury that leads to paralysis [loss of motor function in one or more muscles] on one side of the body), hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), contracture(permanent tightening or shortening of muscles, tendons, skin, or other tissues that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the physician for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 71) reviewed for behavior, when Resident 71 had a change of condition (COC - a sudden, clinically important deviation form a resident's baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral, or functional domains) on 6/29/2026.This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in the necessary care and services for Resident 71.Findings:During a review of Resident 71's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) and depression (a serious mood disorder that causes persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities, and a lack of energy). During a review of Resident 71's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 6/15/2026, the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident 12) reviewed for unnecessary medications (medication prescribed or consumed without a valid clinical indication for an excessive duration, at too high a dose, or when their potential risks outweigh the benefits) had a specific indication for the use of Buspirone (a medication used to treat anxiety disorder [a group of mental health conditions characterized by persistent, excessive, and uncontrollable fear, worry, or dread that interferes with daily life]), in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Use of Psychotropic Medications (drugs that affect a person's mind, emotions, or behavior).This deficient practice had the potential to increase Resident 12's risk to experience adverse effects (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) related to psychotropic medication (drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized resident-centered care plan (a care plan that prioritizes the unique health needs and desired outcomes of the resident) with measurable objectives, timeframe, and interventions to meet the resident's impaired hearing needs for one (1) of 1 sampled residents (Resident 33) reviewed for hearing/vision. This deficient practice has the potential to delay in the necessary care and services for Resident 33's impaired hearing which can result in ineffective communication.Findings:During a review of Resident 33's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following but not limited to diagnoses of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), muscle weakness and abnormality in gait and mobility. During a review of Resident 33's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/9/2026, the H&P indicated the resident has a history of hard of hearing. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for risk for fall for (one) 1 of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 41) reviewed for falls after the resident had an actual fall on 6/7/2026. This deficient practice has the potential for Resident 41 to have further falls, which could result in harm and/ or death.Findings:During a review of Resident 41's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following but not limited to diagnoses of repeated falls, dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), muscle weakness and difficulty in walking. During a review of Resident 41's Care Plan with focus Risk for falls, date initiated 3/12/2025 and revised 2/24/2026, the care plan did not indicate it was revised after the fall on 6/7/2026. The care plan did not indicate interventions such as frequent visual check were added after 6/8/2026. During a review of Resident 41's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with toileting and perineal care (gentle cleaning of the genitals which involves washing, rinsing, and drying the perineum to maintain hygiene, prevent infection, and protect skin integrity) for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL - activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily) in accordance with the facility's policy. This deficient practice had the potential to result in skin breakdown, incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD, skin irritation and damage caused by long-term contact with urine or stool, which makes the skin red, sore, and weakened, and can lead to infection), urinary tract infection, and affect resident's self-esteem.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of generalized muscle weakness and other signs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from accident hazards when the facility failed to ensure:1. Proper disposal of a used vacutainer needle (a specialized, double-ended medical needle used for multi-sample blood collection) when the vacutainer was observed not fully placed into the sharp's container.This deficient practice had the potential to result in accidental needlestick injuries (accidental skin punctures caused by used needles or sharp medical instruments) and possible exposure to bloodborne pathogens (infectious microorganisms present in human blood that can cause disease in humans).2. The wheelchair of one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Residents 85) reviewed for accidents was locked while the resident was left seated in it and left unattended in the hallway.This deficient practice placed Resident 85 at risk of injury and serious harm. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/29/2026 at 9:45 AM with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 1 sampled Resident (Resident 9) reviewed for tube feeding (medical device used to provide liquid nourishment, fluids, and medications by bypassing oral intake) received appropriate gastrostomy tube (GT, tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications) care by failing to confirm GT placement when Licensed Vocational Nurse 5 (LVN 5) did not check the resident's gastric residual volume (GRV, the amount of fluid that remains in the stomach and can be withdrawn through a feeding tube before giving additional feedings or medications. It helps determine how well the stomach is emptying and whether the resident is tolerating tube feedings) prior to medication administration on 7/1/2026. This deficient practice placed Resident 9 at risk of aspiration (feeding could enter the windpipe and lungs) that could lead to lung problems such as pneumonia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 44) reviewed for respiratory care in accordance with the physician's order and facility policy. This deficient practice placed Resident 44 at risk for hypoxia (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen to the blood) causing serious harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 44's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure (a sudden, life threatening emergency where the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood, or they cannot remove enough carbon dioxide from the body) with hypoxia and encephalopathy (a brain disease, disorder, or damage that affects brain function). During a review of Resident 44's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 5/28/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 44 had severe impairment in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate clinical record in accordance with the facility's policy by failing to accurately document the meal percentage on 6/29/2026 for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 41).This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 41's nutritional assessment, care planning, monitoring of intake trends, and timely identification of nutritional risks or decline. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following but not limited to diagnoses of repeated falls, dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), muscle weakness and diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 41's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 5/13/2026, the MDS indicated the resident was severely impaired with cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain essential laundry equipment in safe operating condition by failing to remove the lint as scheduled from the lint trap of one of two (2) dryers in accordance with Policy and Procedure (P&P) This deficient practice resulted in lint buildup within the dryer, creating a fire hazard that placed residents and staff at risk of harm.Findings:During a laundry tour on 7/1/2026 at 2:48 PM, one of the two dryers (Dryer 2) was operating without any items in it. Laundry Aid 1 (LA 1) opened the lint door located underneath the dryer and observed lint build up on the lint trap. During an interview on 7/2/2026 at 9:51 AM, the Maintenance Service Supervisor (MSS) stated the dryer lint trap should be cleaned by every 2 hours as scheduled for fire safety and prevention. During an interview on 7/2/2026 at 12:30PM, LA 2 stated she forgot to clean the lint trap of Dryer 2 on 7/1/2026 at 2 PM. LA 2 also stated the dryer should be regularly cleaned and be free from lint build up to prevent fire. During a review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe, clean, comfortable, sanitary and home-like environment for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 17) reviewed for environment by failing to ensure Resident 17's gastrostomy tube (G-tube pump, an electronic, battery-powered medical device that delivers liquid nutrition, fluids, or medication at a controlled rate directly into a person's stomach through a surgically placed abdominal tube) was free of dried milk residue and the flooring in Resident 17's room was free of dry milk residue. These deficient practices created an unsafe and unsanitary environment for Resident 17 and had the potential to result in accidents and risk of contamination and infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted ), and facility on 8/8/2025 with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movement), diabetes mellitus (a disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its Advance Directive (a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) policy to ensure the residents receive information to formulate an advance directive for two (2) of two sampled residents (Resident 139 and 141). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 139 and 141 to not have their wishes met regarding life-sustaining treatment (any treatment that serves to prolong life without reversing the underlying medical condition) or health care. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 139's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of immunodeficiency (failure of the immune system to protect the body adequately from infection) and schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought). During a review of Resident 139's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper use and follow the physician's order for use of bed rails (are adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed) for six (6) of 6 sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 17, 26, 56 and 69), as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice had the potential to place Residents 2, 17, 26, 56 and 69 at risk for entrapment (residents becomes caught or trapped in spaces around a bed rail) which could result in injury and death. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 getting trapped on the bed rails on 3/25/2025, wherein Resident 1's stomach was caught on the side rail (middle section of the bed) with the resident's upper body off the bed with his head touching the floor, while his lower body was on the bed, and Resident 1 sustaining a half centimeter (cm, unit of measure) cut on the nose bridge. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 56's admission Record, the admission Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) wore hair restraint (worn by food handlers to avoid hair getting into the food) to cover mustache and beard while in the kitchen and food storage areas. This deficient practice had the potential to result in cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria [tiny, single-celled living things that are found everywhere, including in and on your body] from one place to another) and harmful bacterial growth that could lead to illness for 69 of 80 medically compromised residents who receive food from the kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/14/2025 at 10:35 AM in the kitchen, with the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS) and DA 1, DA 1 was observed with mustache and beard and was not wearing beard mask. DA 1 stated he forgot to wear a beard mask today. DSS and DA 1 stated hair could fall into the food and could cause food contamination. DSS and DA 1 stated it was important to wear a beard mask while in the kitchen and storage areas to prevent the spread of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure standard infection prevention control practices (a set of practices that prevent or stop the spread of infections and or diseases in the healthcare setting) were followed for five (5) of seven (7) residents sampled for infection control care areas (Resident 49, 50, 56, 69 and 141) and in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure when: 1.a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 failed to don (putting on) an isolation gown prior to entering Resident 49's room who was on a Transmission Based Precaution (TBP - refers to actions [precautions] implemented in addition to standard precautions that are based upon the means of transmission [airborne, contact, and droplet] to prevent or control infections). 1.b Resident 49 who was on TBP was transported and left in the dining room area for activities on 5/12/2025 by Certified Nursing Assistant 9 (CNA 9). 2.a. LVN 2 failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene (the process of cleaning and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was safe and sanitary by failing to: 1. The kitchen ceiling was free from water leak stains, bubbling and paint that was peeling off. 2. One of four dumpsters was completely closed and not overflowing. This deficient practice resulted in an unsanitary and unhomelike environment and had the potential for residents to be placed at risk for serious illness and hospitalization. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/12/2025 at 8:09 AM by the dumpster area, one of four dumpsters was observed overflowing with boxes and dumpster cover was not completely closed. The Maintenance Director stated the company that picks up the garbage has not arrived yet and they were scheduled to be picked up early this morning. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/12/2025 at 8:13 AM inside the kitchen, with the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS), the ceiling was observed with water stains, paint patches, bubbling and paint that was peeling off. The DSS stated that the water stains…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 139) was treated with respect and dignity in accordance with the facility policy by failing to keep the resident clean and free from food particles. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the resident's self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: During a review of Resident 139's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of immunodeficiency (failure of the immune system to protect the body adequately from infection) and schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought). During a review of Resident 139's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 5/11/2025, the MDS indicated the resident was moderately impaired in cognitive (the ability to understand and make decisions) skills for daily decision making. The MDS also indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 56) psychotropic medication (substance that affect the brain's activities and influence mental processes and behaviors) was appropriate to treat the resident's specific and documented condition in accordance with the facility's policy. This deficient practice placed Resident 56 at risk for unnecessary medication and delayed provision of necessary care. Finding: During a review of Resident 56's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized resident-centered care plan (a care plan that prioritizes the unique health needs and desired outcomes of the resident) with measurable objectives, timeframe, and interventions to meet the resident's oxygen needs for one (1) of 19 sampled residents (Resident 141). This deficient practice has the potential to delay in the necessary care and services for Resident 141's oxygen therapy resulting to shortness of breath or other respiratory complications. Findings: During a review of Resident 141's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection), acute respiratory failure (condition making it difficult to breathe on your own) and immunodeficiency. During a review of Resident 141's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/9/2025, the H&P indicated the resident does not have the capacity to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent injuries for two (2) of five (5) residents sampled by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 55's feet were on a footrest while resident was seated on a wheelchair during transport. This deficient practice had the potential to cause Resident 55's feet to drag which could result in serious injuries. 2. Provide padded siderails (a barrier attached to the side of a bed) for Resident 190 who had history of seizures (burst of uncontrolled electrical activity between brain cells that causes temporary abnormalities in muscle tone or movements like stiffness, twitching or limpness). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 190 to sustain injuries during a seizure disorder activity. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 55's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included displaced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care services to one (1) of one sampled resident (Resident 141) by failing to ensure the Resident 1's nasal cannula (NC - a small plastic tube, which fits into the person's nostrils [nasal prongs] for providing supplemental oxygen) for oxygen was placed correctly while the resident is receiving oxygen. This deficient practices have the potential for Resident 141 to develop complications associated with oxygen therapy. Findings: During a review of Resident 141's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection), acute respiratory failure (condition making it difficult to breathe on your own) and immunodeficiency. During a review of Resident 141's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/9/2025, the H&P indicated the resident does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure hemodialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney[s] have failed) care was provided for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 190) when: 1. A pitcher full of water and a 64 ounce (oz- unit of measurement) bottled watermelon cucumber juice was left at Resident 190's bedside table. 2. A 1000 cubic centimeters (cc - units of volume on liquids) per 24 hours fluid restriction sign was not posted inside Resident 190's room. 3. A precaution sign not to use left arm with the arteriovenous shunt (AV- a surgical connection between an artery and a vein used for hemodialysis) for blood pressure [BP] reading, intravenous (IV- within the vein) access and laboratory sticks were not posted inside the room. These deficient practices had the potential to place Resident 190 at risk for fluid overload (a condition where the body has too much fluid) and complications from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision during toileting and failed to ensure the sensor alarm (helps to alert caregivers when a resident gets out of bed in order to ensure resident safety) was functioning for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 34), who was at high risk for falls. This deficient practice resulted to Resident 34 had fall on 2/13/2024 and was sent to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH 1) and another fall on 3/23/2024. Findings: A review of Resident 34's admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 34 on 5/9/2022 with diagnoses which includes muscle weakness, repeated falls, and lack of coordination. A review of Resident 34's H&P dated 5/26/2024 indicated Resident 34 does not have the capacity to understand make decisions. A review of Resident 34's Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool), dated 3/15/2024, indicated Resident 34 was severely impaired with cognitive (processes of thinking and reasoning)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow its Medication Storage policy by failing to: 1. Remove an expired Humulin R insulin (Insulin Regular Human - a medication used to treat high blood sugar) vial in the refrigerator. 2. Store five (5) unopened Insulin Glargine Flex Pen (a medication used to control high blood sugar) in the refrigerator. This deficient practice increased the risk for Residents on insulin to receive medication that had become ineffective or toxic due to improper storage possibly leading to health complications, which may result to harm and hospitalization. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on [DATE] at 6:33 PM in the Medication Storage room located in Nursing Station 1 (NS 1), a Humulin R insulin vial was observed to be labeled with an open date of [DATE] and discard date of [DATE] in the medication refrigerator. The DON stated the Humulin R vial should be used or discarded within 28 days of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food handling practices in accordance with its policy and procedure by failing to ensure: 1. A container of [NAME] was not broken. 2. A container of cookies was sealed properly. 3. A can opener was clean and free of gunk and rust. 4. Trash can lid was closing properly. Trash can was observed to be full beyond capacity. These deficient practices had the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents, which could place the residents at risk for developing foodborne illness ([food poisoning] with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever) and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization. Findings: During an observation in the facility's kitchen on 5/24/2024 at 1:55PM, the following were observed: 1. The yellow container of [NAME] rice storage was broken. The corner of the hard plastic lid was missing. 2. One container of cookies was not sealed. 3. A can opener was dirty with dried food residue, gunk (unpleasantly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose garbage and refuse (disposable material, which includes both recyclable and non-recyclable material) from the kitchen properly when two bags of kitchen trash were observed on the ground right outside at the back of the facility kitchen. This failure had the potential to result in the attraction and spread of vermin (animals that are believed to be harmful, or that carry diseases, e.g., rodent's parasitic worms or insects) that could potentially infiltrate the facility, affect the resident care areas and pose a disease threat to residents of the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/25/2024 at 8:38 AM with the maintenance supervisor (MS), observed two bags of kitchen trash on the ground near outside the back of the facility kitchen. MS stated the trash was not and should be inside the dumpster (a movable waste container designed to be brought and taken away by a special collection vehicle). MS stated the kitchen staff left the trash on the ground instead of dumping it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy, dignity, and respect for one of four sampled residents (Resident 70) when Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) did not close Resident 70's door and/or pull the resident's privacy curtain during administration of resident's medication via G-tube (a tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 70's emotional and mental well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 70 's admission Record, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included gastrostomy (an opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall, made surgically for the introduction of food) and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). A review of the History and Physical Examination (H&P), dated 2/13/2024, indicated Resident 70 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a clean comfortable, sanitary, and home like environment for three (3) of five (5) sampled rooms by failing to ensure: 1. Rooms A and B's bathroom toilet was free of fecal matter. 2. Room D's bathroom light bulb and wire were covered. This deficient practice caused an unsanitary and unsafe environment and had a potential for residents to be placed at risk for infection and injury. Findings: 1. During an observation in Rooms B and Room C 's bathroom on 5/24/2024 at 4:37 PM, Rooms B and Room C's bathroom toilet seat was observed to have a dry dark brown to blackish in color stool. During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review on 5/26/2024 at 7:55 PM with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 3), LVN 3 stated Rooms B and Room C's bathroom toilet seat was observed to have a dry dark brown to blackish in color stool. LVN 3 stated the toilet needs to be sanitary to prevent infection. LVN 3 stated the staff should have cleaned it after for the next resident to use. LVN 3 also stated the Policy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-26 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized baseline care plan with 48 hours of admission for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 182) who was receiving hemodialysis (process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body). This deficient practice had the potential not to meet the needs of Resident 182 that included interventions for hemodialysis, safety, and wellbeing, which could lead to harm and hospitalization. Findings: A review of Resident 182's admission Record indicated Resident 182 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (kidneys suddenly become unable to filter waste products from your blood that can develop rapidly over a few hours or a few days), dependence on renal (kidney) dialysis, and hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of Resident 182's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 5/25/2024, indicated Resident 182's cognitive (ability to think…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan for one of five sampled residents (Resident 285) was developed to address non-compliance with medications, as indicated on the facility's care plan policy. This failure had the potential for licensed staff not to utilize interventions for resident to comply with timely administration of medications, which could place Resident 285 at risk for adverse effects from not taking medications as ordered. Findings: A review of Resident 285's admission Records indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (a chronic disease that result in high blood sugar levels in the blood) and cerebral infarction (stroke, a loss of blood flow to part of the brain, causing damage). A review of Resident 285's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/17/2024, indicated the resident has the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 285's Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to meet professional standards of quality (care and services are provided according to accepted standards of clinical practice) for one (1) of four sample residents (Resident 18) when Licensed Vocation Nurse 2 (LVN 2) failed to apply gentle pressure to the lacrimal (tear) duct to prevent systemic absorption of the medication of Artificial Tear ophthalmic Solution (a medication used to treat dry eye) during medication administration, as indicated on the facility's Administration of Eye Drop or Ointment policy. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 18 to have an adverse reaction. Findings: A review of Resident 18's admission Record indicated Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (brain disorder that disables a resident from performing everyday activities) and hyperlipidemia (a condition in which there are high levels of fat particles [lipids] in the blood). A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Low Air Loss mattress (LAL mattress, designed to prevent and treat pressure ulcer [localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue caused by prolonged pressure]) for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 234) was functioning properly. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 234's pressure ulcer to worsen and for the resident to develop new pressure injury. Findings: A review of Resident 234's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 234 on 5/16/2024. Resident 234's diagnoses included abnormalities of gait and mobility, repeated fall, pressure ulcer of sacral region (are wounds that form as a direct result of pressure over a bony prominence). A review of Resident 234's Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool), dated 5/21/2024, indicated Resident 234's cognitive (processes of thinking and reasoning) skills for daily decision making was intact. The MDS indicated Resident 234 was dependent (helper does all the effort) on toileting,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled resident (Resident 182), who was receiving hemodialysis (process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body) treatment was provided dialysis care and services by failing to assess the resident's right upper chest dialysis access site on 5/20/2024, 5/22/2024, 5/24/2024, in accordance with the facility policy. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 182 to suffer from complications such as bleeding or infection from the central venous catheter (a catheter [thin tube] that is placed under the skin in a vein, allowing long-term access to the vein. Findings: A review of Resident 182's admission Record indicated Resident 182 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (kidneys suddenly become unable to filter waste products from your blood that can develop rapidly over a few hours or a few days), dependence on renal (kidney) dialysis, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of one of four sampled residents (Resident 11) by failing to administer resident's Calcitonin Solution (a medication used to treat bone loss) nasal spray, as indicated on the physician order. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 11's bone to become more fragile or low in bone mass which could put the resident at a greater risk for fracture (break in the bone). Findings: A review of Resident 11's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movement, chiefly affecting middle-aged and elderly people). A review of the History and Physical Examination (H&P), dated 8/29/2023, indicated Resident 11 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-26 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident who required adaptive feeding equipment (modified utensils, accessories, glasses, and plates to help improve residents' comfort and independence), utilize a plate guard (unique spill guard which prevents food from accidentally being pushed off the plate) during meal, as indicated on the physician's order, for one of 19 sampled resident (Resident 24). This deficient practice placed Resident 24 at risk for further decline in physical functioning and decline to perform self-feeding skills. Findings: A review of Resident 24's admission Record indicated the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] and got readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to bilateral nuclear cataract (a type of cataract [a cloudy area in the lens of your eye] that affects the center of the eye's lens, causing cloudy vision), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the facility's infection control policy for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 70) when staff was observed not using a gown while providing high-contact resident care activities to Resident 70. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 70 developing an infection and spread of infection among staff and residents. Findings: A review of Resident 70's admission Records indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection) and urinary tract infection (infection of the urinary tract). A review of Resident 70's History and Physical (H&P), dated 2/13/2024, indicated the resident does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. The H&P also indicated Resident 70 has a Gastrostomy Tube (g-tube, tube inserted through the belly to the stomach used to give…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a string was attached to the call light in the bathroom for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 39). This deficient practice resulted in the call light not being easily accessible to Resident 39 which had the potential to result in a delay in the provision of care and assistance leading to falls, accidents, and injuries. Findings: A review of Resident 39's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movement, chiefly affecting middle-aged and elderly residents). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 4/8/2024, indicated Resident 39 cognitive skill (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding for daily decision-making) was moderately impaired. The MDS also indicated Resident 39 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when the resident had a change in condition (COC) for a fever (elevated temperature) and episodes of nausea as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice had the potential to delay medical interventions and treatment for a possible wound infection. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a disorder in which the body does not produce enough or respond normally to insulin [a hormone released from the pancreas that controls the amount of glucose in the blood], causing blood sugar [glucose] levels to be abnormally high), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), and wedge compression fraction (small breaks in the vertebrae [bones in your spine] of the T11 to T12 (the last members of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-05-15 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Daily Staffing Report (Nurse Staffing Information) on 5/12/2025, 5/13/2025 and 5/14/2025 was complete and posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents, visitors, and staff in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. These deficient practices had the potential for residents and visitors to not be informed of the actual number of nurses providing direct care to the residents. Findings: During an observation on 5/12/2025 at 8:15 AM, the Daily Staffing Report, dated 5/12/2025, was posted on the wall across from the nurses' station, however, it was placed behind another facility form which made it not visible to residents, visitors, and staff. During an observation on 5/13/2025 at 9:05 AM, the Daily Staffing Report, dated 5/13/2025, was posted on the wall across from the nurses' station, however, it was placed behind another facility form which made it not visible to residents, visitors, and staff. The Daily Staffing Report did not include the actual direct care hours for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 29 resident rooms, a multiple resident room (Room A) met the minimum square footage requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft. unit of measurement) per resident. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the care, comfort, and services to the residents. Findings: During an observation on 5/12/2025 at 1:30 PM, Room A had three beds and three residents (Residents 28, 40, and 42) occupying the beds in the room. All three residents were on the bed and appeared comfortable. Room A had enough space for a bedside table, nightstand, and a wheelchair for each resident. During the survey period from 5/12/2025 to 5/15/2025, residents and staff were interviewed and presented no complaints regarding the size of their room. During a review of the facility's room waiver request, dated 5/15/2025, the request indicated Room A measured at 223 sq. ft. The waiver request also indicated the residents' needs were accommodated and there were no adverse effects to the health and safety and welfare of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-26 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 29 resident rooms, a multiple resident room (Room E) met the minimum square footage requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft. unit of measurement) per resident. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the care, comfort, and services to the residents. Findings: A review of the facility's room waiver request, dated 5/24/2024, indicated Room E measured at 223 sq. ft. and that the residents' needs were accommodated and that there were no adverse effects to the health and safety and welfare of the residents occupying these rooms. A review of the facility's Client Accommodations Analysis, dated 5/24/2024, indicated Room E measured at 223 sq. ft and was currently occupied by three residents. During an observation on 5/24/2024 at 1:38 PM, Room E had three beds and three residents (Residents 1, 19, and 40) occupying the beds in the room. All three residents were on the bed and appeared comfortable. Room E had enough space for a bedside table, nightstand, and a wheelchair for each resident.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurately documented medical records for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to document the resident ' s elevated temperature from 9/3/2023 until 9/04/2023 at 7 AM. This deficient practice had the potential to cause medication errors, inconsistencies in providing the necessary care and services to Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/8/2023, with diagnoses including hypertension (an abnormally high blood pressure), a non-displaced compression fraction T12 (a type of broken bone that can cause your vertebrae to collapse, making them shorter), hyponatremia (an abnormally low concentration of sodium in the blood), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (disease, involving inappropriately elevated blood glucose levels). During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P, the initial clinical evaluation and examination of the patient) dated 8/10/2023, indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 3.2 | +1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MONTEREY PARK CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 08/01/1981 |
| DEHGHANMANESH, ADRIAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| FARRALES, MARY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| KOCHEK, JOSHUA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| OXFORD, MICHEAL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/03/2022 |
| JOHNSON, FRANK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/07/1992 |
| SALAMA, OMAR AHMED | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/07/2022 |
| TUPAS, SARAH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/08/2021 |
| WANG, WEI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2001 |
| MPCH II LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/04/2020 |
| SUN MAR MANAGEMENT SERVICES | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/12/1989 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055162. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.