Villa Rancho Bernardo Care Center
15720 Bernardo Center Drive, San Diego, CA 92127 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 299 certified beds · (858) 672-3900 Medicare & Medicaid certified
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.1% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.1% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.1% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.1% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.4% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.5% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.7% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.5% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.7% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.9% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.7% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.06 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.06 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 315 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 91.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 270 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.5%CMS range 41.3–53.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 7.8–11.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 91.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 88.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 81.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 10.5%CMS range 8.1–13.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.42 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 299 beds and averages 286.1 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.77 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The following reflects the findings of the California Department of Public Health during an abbreviated standard survey. Complaint Numbers: The inspection was limited to the specific complaint and Facility Reported Incident investigated and does not represent the findings of a full inspection of the facility. One deficiency was issued for the complaint number: (Refer to Ftag F609). Findings:During a record review, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis affecting one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (a stroke) and unspecified dementia (a condition which affects memory, thinking, and the ability to perform daily activities).During a record review, the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool), indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool to assess cognition, or thinking skills) of 0 which indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment.During a joint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS- standard assessment to facilitate resident's care) related to hospice (medical care for residents expected to live six months or less) services were coded accurately for one of 3 sampled residents reviewed for hospice (Resident 212). As a result, Resident 212 did not reflect their current health status, which may lead to unmet hospice care needs. Findings: Resident 212 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia (memory problem) per the admission Record. A review of Resident 212's medical records was conducted. Per the MDS assessment, dated 8/16/24, Section O Special Treatments, Procedure, and Programs, Resident 212 was not coded under hospice care. A review of Resident 212 Hospice Binder: Resident 212 received hospice care and service since 9/6/23, and there was no evidence that hospice services were discontinued. Per the November 2024 Order Summary, Resident 212 did not have hospice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to create person-centered care plans (a document that outlines the care and support a patient will receive) regarding non-pharmacological interventions (a healthcare treatment that doesn't involve medication) for three of 35 sampled residents (Residents 240, 290 and 440). This failure had the potential to decrease the types of supportive interventions these residents received while at the facility. Findings: Resident 240 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression (a serious mental health condition that causes a persistent low mood). Resident 290 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression. Resident 440 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression. On 11/6/24 at 1:44 P.M., an interview and concurrent record review were conducted with the Licensed Nurse (LN) 4 and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) who stated Resident 240 was receiving two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to flush a gastronomy tube (GT- artificial external opening in the stomach for nutritional support) between each medication administered with water for one resident of four sampled residents reviewed for GT (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1's GT to malfunction. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and a gastrostomy tube, per the resident's admission Record. On 11/6/24 at 8:43 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview of a medication administration was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 11. LN 11 administered the following medications via GT: -Polyethylene glycol (constipation prevention) 17 grams (gm) mixed with 240 milliliters (mLs) of water -Multivitamin with minerals (supplement) mixed with 15 mLs of water -Cetirizine (itchiness relief) 10 milligrams (mg) mixed with 15 mLs of water -Calcium carbonate (supplement) 1,250 mg mixed with 30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavior monitoring was in placed for a psychotropic (drugs that affect a person's mental state) medication in one of five reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 279). This failure had the potential for Resident 279 to continuously received the medication without proper monitoring and possibly affect Resident 279's health condition and or decline. Findings: A record review of the facility's admission Record indicated Resident 279 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Depression (a group of condition associated with the elevation or lowering of a person's mood) and Essential Hypertension (elevated blood pressure). An observation on 11/5/24 at 9:30 A.M., in Resident 279's room was conducted. Resident 279 was lying in bed, asleep . An observation on 11/6/24 at 2 P.M., in resident 279's room was conducted. Resident 279 was asleep with no behaviors. A record review of Resident 279's Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended in one of six residents observed for medication storage (Resident 18). This failure had the potential to affect residents' safety and may lead to drug diversion. Findings: A record review of the facility's admission Record indicated Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and Heart Failure. An observation on 11/4/24 at 9:25 A.M., in Resident 18's room was conducted. Resident 18 had two medications, one round pill and one yellow pill inside a small clear cup sitting on Resident 18's bedside table. Resident 18 stated, the nurse left the medications there for her to take after breakfast. Resident 18 stated she did not know what the medications were and what for. An interview on 11/6/24 at 10:10 A.M., with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2 was conducted. LN 2 stated it was important not to leave medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clinical record was complete for one of 35 residents reviewed for medical record accuracy (Resident 153) when a physician's order for rolled washcloth was not monitored. This failure had the potential for Resident 153 to not have the adequate care and to not communicate Resident 153's care needs amongst healthcare providers. Findings: A record review of Resident 153's admission Record indicated Resident 153 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Muscle Weakness and Contracture (a stiffening /shortening at any joint, that reduces the joint's range of motion) of muscle, upper arm. A joint observation and interview on 11/4/24 at 8:50 A.M., with Resident 153 was conducted. Resident 153 had rolled washcloths on both her hands. Resident 153 stated she had the contractures for years now due to her arthritis (pain and stiffness of joints). A record review of Resident 153's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one medication was administered without error for one resident (1). As a result, Resident 1 was administered amlodipine (antihypertensive; medication used to treat high blood pressure; medication helps to lower the blood pressure) outside of the parameter (guideline/instruction) ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to further lower Resident 1's blood pressure. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of systolic heart failure (serious condition that occurs when the heart's left ventricle [one of the two chambers at the bottom of the heart that pump out blood] is weak and cannot contract normally), per the facility's admission Record. A record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- nursing assessment tool that is used to develop a plan of care) dated 6/28/24, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIM- developed by reviewing the resident's status during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the food served to residents were palatable and acceptable according to resident comments and facility policy. This failure had the potential to cause decreased food intake and negatively impact the resident's nutritional status. The facility census was 271. Cross reference F805, F806 Findings: During the initial survey screening process on 12/4/2023 at 8:15 A.M., multiple observations and interviews were conducted with the residents about the facility's food and meals. Resident comments included The food is bad; I don't eat the food here, my family brings me food; The food is bland, and I don't eat it; There is no variety; and My chicken was raw, undercooked. During a review of the facility's Daily Spreadsheet Menus dated 12/4/23, the Regular Diet lunch meal indicated .Dijon Pork cutlet, Macaroni and cheese, steamed string beans, and Bread or dinner roll . During an observation of the lunch meal preparation and concurrent interview on 12/4/23 at 9:28 A.M., [NAME] (CK) 1 was boiling macaroni pasta…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were maintained for food storage according to standards of practice when: 1. A rubber tray with twenty five cups of milk and other drink beverages had a use-by date of 12/2/23, and a large plastic bin filled with individual plastic cups of canned sliced pears with a use-by date of 12/3/23, were found in the walk-in refrigerator on 12/4/23; 2. Three serving scoops with brown crusted substances and residue were stored with clean serving utensils, and 3. The ice machine was not cleaned and maintained according to manufacturer's instructions and standards of practice. These failures had the potential to expose residents to contaminants that could cause foodborne illness. The facility census was 271. Findings: 1. During the initial tour of the kitchen on 12/4/23 at 7:55 A.M., an observation and of the walk-in refrigerator and an interview with the Registered Dietitian (RD) was performed. The refrigerator had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and documentation, the facility failed to ensure essential kitchen equipment was maintained in working operational condition when three of four ovens were not working or maintained according to standards of practice or facility policy. This failure affected the ability of the Food and Nutrition Services Department to prepare resident meals safely and efficiently, which had the potential for residents to receive undercooked food, and to develop food borne illness. The facility census was 271. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with [NAME] 1 (CK 1) on 12/4/23 at 8:50 A.M., there were two double stackable ovens next to the cooktop gas stove range with an oven underneath. The bottom oven in the stackable oven unit had an out of order, maintenance notified 12/3/23 sign taped to the bottom handle. CK1 stated the oven had not been working since last Thursday (11/30/23) but also stated it may have been not working longer than that. CK 1 attempted to light the lower left oven pilot light three times before it eventually lit and stayed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document reviews, the facility failed to ensure that low air loss mattresses (LAL - an air flow mattress used to prevent skin breakdown by distributing weight over the mattress to reduce pressure to the skin) were set according to the physician's order for five of five residents (Resident 197, Resident 203, Resident 7, Resident 69, Resident 216) reviewed for pressure ulcer. These failures increased the risk for skin breakdown for all residents. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 197's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Heart Failure (occurs when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should). A review of Resident 197's physician's order, dated 12/17/21, indicated, .LAL Mattress for skin management. License nurse to monitor proper functioning of LAL mattress. License nurse to monitor setting if LAL mattress per pt [patient] weight or comfort QS [every shift]. A record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS - assessment tool) related to the use of an anticoagulant (medicine that prevent or reduce blood clots) for two of 35 residents (Resident 69 and Resident 106) reviewed for MDS accuracy. Resident 69 and Resident 106's MDS assessments, dated 11/19/23, incorrectly coded that both residents received an anticoagulant medication during the 7-day look back period of 11/13/23-11/19/23. These failures had the potential for staff to provide both residents with inappropriate care due to the wrong data inputted in the residents' MDS assessment. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 69's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Spinal Stenosis (when the space inside the backbone is too small causing pressure to spinal cord [back bone] and nerves that carry sensations to brain and body). A record review of Resident 69's MDS assessment, dated 11/19/23, Section N…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the PASSAR Level 2 (PSL2) (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review- a form to determine if a resident has or is suspected of having a mental illness) was completed after PASSAR Level 1 (PSL1) was positive for one of 35 residents (Resident 183) reviewed for PASSAR. This failure had the potential to not ensure the appropriate mental health services for Resident 183. Findings: A review of Resident 183's admission Record (AR) indicated Resident 183 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Unspecified Dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning), unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbances, and Depression (persistent sadness and a lack of interest or pleasure). On 12/4/23 at 3:30 P.M., an interview with Resident 183 was attempted. Resident 183 refused interview. On 12/6/23 at 11:15 A.M., a concurrent interview of Licensed Nurse (LN) 2 and record review of Resident 183's chart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a patient-centered plan of care for one of 35 residents (Resident 152) related to language. This failure had the potential for Resident 152's care needs to not be addressed due to miscommunication. Findings: A review of Resident 152's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy (is a group of disorders that affect a person's ability to move and maintain balance and posture). Per the admission Record, Resident 152's primary language was Chinese. A record review of the Resident 152's Minimum Data Set (MDS - assessment tool), dated 10/08/23, indicated under Section C100 Cognitive Patterns, Resident 152 was coded 0. Per the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI)/MDS manual, Resident 152 was rarely/never understood. An interview was conducted on 12/04/23, at 9:00 A.M., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 11. CNA 11 stated that Resident 152 was verbal and did not speak English.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update the plan of care for one of 35 residents (Resident 101) related to activities of daily living (activities such as eating, toileting, dressing, etc.). This failure had the potential for Resident 101's ADL needs to not be addressed. Findings: A review of Resident 101's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory, thinking skills, and eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks). A record review of Resident 101's Minimum Data Set (MDS - assessment tool), dated 9/14/23, indicated the resident required extensive assistance with eating and toileting. An interview and record review of Resident 101's medical record was conducted on 12/06/23 at 9:45 A.M., with the Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDSN). The MDSN stated that a significant change of condition (SCSA - when two or more factors of decline is captured with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to monitor and fully assess a sampled resident, Resident 221, with a severe weight loss of 17.3% in six months, according to the facility's policy. This failure led to further decline in Resident 221's nutritional and health status. Findings: According to the Academy of Nutrition & Dietetics, Nutrition Care Manual, dated 2022, Treatment of unintended weight loss is imperative to ensure optimal outcomes for the older adult. Unintended weight loss is linked to increased mortality (death) among older adults . residents in long-term-care facilities who continue losing weight have a higher mortality rate compared with those who stop losing weight. Weight loss of 5% or more within 30 days is associated with a tenfold increase in the likelihood of death. Unintended weight loss often results in protein-energy undernutrition (low protein or calorie intake resulting in insufficient nutrient absorption), as the older adult loses critical lean body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Medication Regimen Review (MRR - evaluation of a resident's medications with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences associated with medications) was completed and implemented by the attending physician for one of 35 residents (Resident 66). This failure had the potential for Resident 66 to experience side effects from the medications. Findings: Resident 66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of acute renal failure (a sudden episode of kidney failure or damage), per the facility's face sheet. On 12/6/23 at 7:58 A.M., a concurrent interview and review of Resident 66's MRR dated November 2023, was conducted with licensed nurse (LN) 21. Resident 66's MRR indicated inquiry related to continued usage of several medications, dose reduction, or discontinuation of medications, if appropriate, and possible side effects the resident may experience with continued use. LN 21 stated this record was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was prepared in a form to meet the nutritional needs for a sampled resident, Resident 132. This failure had the potential to cause poor food intake because the resident did not receive meals that met the correct form according to the Resident 132's physician-ordered diet. Cross reference F804, F806 Findings: Per Resident 132's Facility admission record, Resident 132 was admitted on [DATE] with health conditions that included: Type 2 (adult onset) diabetes (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes sugar); diabetic retinopathy (an eye condition that can cause vision loss, up to blindness); generalized (all over) muscle weakness; and dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem solving skills and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life). During a review of Resident 132's Physician Order Sheet, dated 12/7/23, the therapeutic diet order indicated, CCHO (Consistent Carbohydrate),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate one of 35 sampled residents' food preferences (Resident 140). This failure had the potential to result in decreased caloric and nutrient intake. Findings: A review of facility's document admission Record (AR), dated 8/27/2023, indicated Resident 140 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include: End Stage Renal Disease(Disease where Kidneys are not functioning) , Dependence on Renal Dialysis (Treatment to filter blood of toxins), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus(Disease where body unable to regulate own blood sugars), and Iron Deficiency Anemia(Low red blood cell count due to lack of Iron in diet). A review of Resident 140's Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment tool) section C, Cognitive Patterns, dated 10/17/2023, indicated Resident 140's BIMS (A tool to measure resident's cognitive ability) was measured to be 15, meaning resident had intact cognition. On 12/4/23 at 4:05 P.M., a concurrent observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to implement proper infection control practices when: 1. An employee did not wear a gown while touching dirty linens 2. A tube feeding was not disposed of in a timely manner for 1 out of 35 sampled residents (Resident 196). These failures had the potential to spread infection amongst the residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: 1. On 12/7/23 at 9:11 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Infection Preventionist (IP) 1 and the Maintenance Director (DM). During the tour of the laundry area, housekeeping (HK) 1 entered the dirty section of the laundry area. HK 1 was observed pulling the cart of dirty linens wearing his gloves. HK 1 did not wear a gown. During the observation, HK 1 transferred bags of dirty linens from one cart to another. During this process, some of the bags ripped, exposing the dirty linens inside. HK 1's arms touched the dirty linens. The DM spoke to HK 1 to wear a gown, but HK 1 continued to transfer the ripped bags of dirty linens while ungowned. On 12/7/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care which directed staff to remove stitches for one of two sampled residents (1). This failure placed Resident 1 at an increased risk of stitches being left in too long, which carried an increased risk of scarring. Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Per the document titled Fall, dated 3/29/23, the physician noted that Resident 1 had a right facial laceration (a deep cut to the face), and the Discharge plan included, .Sutures (stitches) should be removed in 5 days . On 8/10/23 at 10 A.M., an interview was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). The ADON stated, Resident 1 returned from the hospital with stitches and an order to remove the stitches in five days. The ADON further stated, the order to remove the stitches was never entered into their system, and there was no documentation to show when the stitches were removed. The ADON stated, the admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-11-18 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the food and nutrition services staff maintained current competency in dietetic task operations to safely carry out the kitchen functions in a sanitary manner according to facility policies and standard of practice when: 1. A [NAME] could not correctly demonstrate how to calibrate the food thermometer; 2. A Dietary Aide did not correctly cool down the tuna salad before serving it; 3. A Dishwasher after emptying the garbage bins at the outside dumpster did not wash his hands after entering the kitchen. These failures had the potential to expose residents to unsafe and unsanitary food service practices that could result in widespread food borne illness. Cross reference 803, 804, 806, and 812 Findings: 1. On 11/16/21 at 3:25 P.M., a concurrent observation and interview with CK 2 was conducted in the kitchen. CK 2 stated he calibrated the digital thermometer every time he placed the food out on the tray line. CK 2 demonstrated the thermometer calibration by cleaning it with an alcohol wipe, then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-11-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure dietary staff correctly followed the recipes and menus as printed and according to the facility policy when: 1. Soup was not included on the menu. 2. White roll was served instead of wheat roll. These failures resulted in a vulnerable resident population receiving inadequate and/or incorrect nutrition. Cross reference 804, 806 Findings: On 11/15/21, a review of the Week- At- A Glance Fall Menu 2021 Week 2 November 11 to November 21 was conducted. Monday, 11/15/21 - Regular lunch menu included: pot roast, wheat roll, brussels sprouts, ice cream, garlic mashed potatoes, and milk. Monday, 11/15/21 - Pureed lunch menu included: pureed pot roast, pureed wheat bread, pureed brussels sprout, ice cream, garlic mashed potato, and milk. On 11/15/21 at 11:27 A.M., an observation and interview with CK 2, FSD and DA 4 was conducted during the tray line meal service. There was a dark brown colored pureed food that was served to 48 residents on pureed diets. DA 4 and CK 2 stated the dark brown textured oatmeal food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary measures were met in the kitchen during dietary operations according to standards of practice when: 1. Expired and undated foods were found inside the walk-in refrigerator and dry storage room; 2. Several pieces of red meat patties were found on long metal sheet pans uncovered and exposed on an open drying rack in the walk-in refrigerator; 3. Two ice machines were dirty with brown spots inside the ice bin containing ice and was not cleaned according to manufacturer's guidance; 4. Improper cooling procedures were conducted after tuna salad preparation; 5. Three Nursing unit refrigerators had expired foods and the correct temperature was not regularly maintained. These deficient practices exposed all residents who receive food from the kitchen to unsanitary practices and potentially unsafe foods that could lead to widespread foodborne illness. Cross reference 802, 803, 804, and 806 Findings: 1. During the initial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 17 of 61 residents reviewed were provided with safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment when residents' rooms (109, 116, 117, 118, 120, 126, 127, 123, 129, 105, 111, 114, 131, 119, 115, 125, 127) had broken corner walls, broken brown baseboard, stained toilet seats, air vents with white and gray debris. These failures did not promote a homelike environment to the residents. Findings: On 11/15/2021 at 8:36 A.M., an observation was conducted in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The door area next to the doorknob of the resident room had splintered (a small, thin, sharp piece of wood or the like, split or broken off from the main body) wood. The doorknob was loose. The room's hallway and cabinet side corner wall had cracks and broken pieces. The room's hallway and restroom side corner wall were cracked and part of the baseboard was cracked and peeled off from the wall. On 11/15/21 at 9:31 A.M., an observation was conducted in room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to set a pressure relieving mattress per the resident's weight for 7 of 45 sampled residents (39, 57, 74, 75, 128, 242, 520). As a result, there was the risk of skin breakdown and delayed wound healing. Findings: 1. Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include protein-calorie malnutrition (not enough protein which is important for wound healing) and dementia (a mental and physical decline). Per the facility's careplan, revised 9/3/21, Resident 39 had the potential for pressure ulcer (pressure related wound) development. Per the facility's Medication Review Report, dated 11/17/21, Resident 39 had an order on 1/25/19 for Licensed Nurse to monitor the setting of LAL mattress (pressure relieving mattress) per resident's weight and comfort every shift. Per the facility's Weights and Vitals Summary, dated 11/17/21, Resident 39's weighed 92.4 pounds on 11/4/21. On 11/15/21 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 12 of 56 residents reviewed were free of accidents and hazards when: 1. A removable glass shelf of a mirror bathroom cabinet was found leaning against the wall next to Resident 107's bed. 2. Resident's room (109, 116, 117, 118, 120, 126, 127, 129, 105, 111, 114 131) had cracked and broken corner walls and baseboard that were pointed and had rough and rugged edges. 3. Two double doors going to the Dining area had pointed metal astragal (a piece of hardware that is used on a pair of doors to seal the gap between the doors when they are closed). Three corner wall guards' bottom area of the hallway in front of nursing station were broken and had pointed and rough edges. These failures had the potential to cause injury and harm to residents, staff and visitors. Findings: 1. Resident 107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Unspecified Dementia with behavioral disturbance (agitation including verbal and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and review of menus, the facility failed to ensure that substitutes and meal alternatives of equal nutritive value, including vegetarian food options, were offered and made available to residents as per facility policy. This finding had the potential to cause reduced food intake which could lead to weight loss and impaired nutritional status because of insufficient calories and protein. Cross reference 803, 804, 805 Findings: On 11/16/21 and 11/17/21, a record review was conducted. Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 29 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include heart disease, kidney failure, and bladder dysfunction. Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 30 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include stroke (disruption of blood supply to the brain), type 2 diabetes (impairment of blood sugar regulation), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 31 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one residents (Resident 57) reviewed for restraint, was free from unnecessary restraint, when the facility staff applied a restraint without a physician's order. As a result, Resident 57's freedom of movement was restricted. Findings: According to Resident 57's document titled, admission Record, Resident 57 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses to include Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance (loss of cognitive functioning) and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Dominant Side (left-sided weakness and paralysis after a stroke). On 11/15/21, at 09:15 AM, an observation of Resident 57 was conducted. Resident 57 laid in bed and was observed wearing a non-skid sock on her right hand. On 11/15/21, at 12:07 PM, an observation of Resident 57 was conducted. Resident 57 laid in bed and was observed wearing a non-skid sock on her right hand. On 11/15/21, at 12:41 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not develop new fall preventative intervention for one of 45 sampled residents (Resident 175) after an incident of a fall. This failure had the potential for Resident 175 to have future falls. Findings: Per Resident 175's Facesheet, Resident 175 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Repeated Falls, Contact with and Suspected Exposure to COVID-19 (Corona Virus Disease 2019 [an illness caused by a virus]). On 11/15/21 at 9:42 AM, an observation was conducted on Resident 175. Resident 175 was awake in bed with the right bed rail up. A landing mat was observed on the floor on the left side of the bed. On 11/17/21 at 9:04 AM, a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with LN 31 (Licensed Nurse 31). A review of Resident 175's nursing progress notes, dated 10/6/21, indicated that the resident had an episode of an unwitnessed fall and that the resident sustained a laceration on the left forehead. A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide an interpreter service for one of three residents (Resident 25) reviewed for communication. This had the potential for the healthcare provider to misinterpret Resident 25's needs and health situation. Findings: Per Resident 25's facehseet, Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 11/15/21 at 10:18 AM, an observation of Resident 25 was conducted. Resident 25 was sitting in her wheelchair. Resident 25 was observed not understanding or speaking any English. Resident 25 was Vietnamese. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 33 came in the room and was observed doing only hand gestures to communicate with Resident 25 and vice versa. On 11/17/21 at 10:11 AM, an interview was conducted with CNA 34. CNA 34 stated she and Resident 25 communicated through hand gestures, and by reading Resident 25's facial expressions. CNA 34 also stated she used an (brand of phone) interpreter app to communicate with Resident 25. CNA 34 stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for one of 45 sampled residents (Resident 57) when: 1. The licensed nurses (LNs) did not apply compression stockings to Resident 57. 2. The LNs did not apply Scopolamine patch (medicated patch to prevent excessive secretions) to Resident 57. As a result, Resident 57 had the potential for developing deep venous thrombosis (DVT, a blood clot in a deep vein, usually in the legs). Also, Resident 57 had the potential to develop a secretion build up in the airways. Findings: 1. According to the facility's document titled, admission Record, Resident 57 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses to include Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Dominant Side (left-sided paralysis and weakness after a stroke). According to Resident 57's document titled, Medication Review Report (physician's orders), dated 7/26/21, .Knee high ted hose (compression stockings)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address weight loss for one sampled resident (14). As a result, Resident 14 was at an increased risk of decline in health. Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include heart failure, weakness, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and dementia (a mental and physical decline). Per the facility's Weights and Vitals Summary dated 11/18/21, Resident 14 weighed 115 pounds on 11/3/21, which was a 5.6% loss compared to her weight of 121.8 pounds on 10/6/21, and a 15.3% loss compared to her weight of 135.8 pounds on 8/11/21. Per the facility's Nutritional assessment dated [DATE], Resident 14 had a significant weight loss of 5.6% of body weight in one month. The Nutritional Assessment did not contain any recommendations to manage the weight loss. On 11/18/21 at 1:20 P.M., an interview was conducted with RD 1. RD 1 stated, on 11/3/21 Resident 14's weight indicated a weight loss from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the food was prepared by methods that conserved nutritive value and appearance when residents stated facility food was served cold without flavor and not at the appropriate texture. This deficient practice had the potential to decrease the food intake of residents and would negatively impact their nutritional status. Cross reference 800, 803, 805 and 806 Findings: During the initial survey tour on 11/15/21 at 8:00 A.M., multiple observations and interviews were conducted by Surveyors with residents about the facility food. Resident comments included I do not like the food because I only get sandwiches and they're hard, The food is cold, The food doesn't taste good or have flavor. On 11/16/21 at 10:00 A.M., during a resident council meeting, ten residents made comments about the facility food. Seven of the residents stated the food was served cold, without flavor, and at the incorrect texture. On 11/16/21, a review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 45 sampled residents' (Resident 235) food was prepared in a form designed to meet her nutritional needs. As a result, there was a potential for Resident 235's nutritional intake to be compromised. Findings: Resident 235 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] per the admission Record. On 11/15/21, at 9:38 AM, a joint observation and interview was conducted with Resident 235. Resident 235 was observed with no teeth. Resident 235 stated she had no dentures and had been eating regular food with difficulty. Resident 235 stated she was not offered an alternative diet. On 11/15/21, at 1:17 PM, a joint observation and interview was conducted with Resident 235. Resident 235 was observed finishing lunch in her room. The meal tray ticket on Resident 235's tray indicated a diet restriction of NAS (No Added Salt) only. Resident 235 stated she could not eat the brussels sprouts and that they would be easier to eat if they were cut into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of sampled 45 residents' (Resident 57) medical record was accurate related to the application of the resident's compression stockings. As a result, Resident 57's medical record incorrectly indicated that the resident's compressions stockings have been applied, when they were not. Findings: According to the facility's document titled, admission Record, Resident 57 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses to include Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Dominant Side (left-sided paralysis and weakness after a stroke). On 11/17/21, at 9:21 A.M., a joint observation and interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 62. Resident 57 was observed not wearing compression stockings. CNA 62 stated she had never seen Resident 57 wear compression stockings. On 11/17/21, at 2:17 PM, an interview was conducted with CNA 63. CNA 63 stated she had not seen Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 3.2 | +1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 3.3 | +1.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VILLA RANCHO BERNARDO HEALTH CARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 11/07/1996 |
| JOHNSON, FRANK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/06/2003 |
| DAVIS, MARIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/08/2014 |
| DAWSON, KYLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/05/2023 |
| DEHGHANMANESH, ADRIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| KOCHEK, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| OXFORD, MICHEAL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/03/2022 |
| SINGH, TEJA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2016 |
| CIBC BANK USA | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2021 |
| SUN MAR MANAGEMENT SERVICES | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/12/1989 |
| VRB AVIV, LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/11/2025 |
| FARRALES, MARY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $4.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555318. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.