Bridgewater Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 92 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.3 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a nasogastric tube was sent to the hospital for an evaluation in a timely manner as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for enteral feedings. (Resident B)Findings include: During an interview, on 6/10/26 at 12:52 p.m., Resident B's family member indicated Resident B was transferred to the emergency room, on 2/16/26, for a clogged nasogastric tube (a tube which passes through the nose and down through the nasopharynx and esophagus into the stomach). The length of time the nasogastric tube had been clogged was uncertain, but it may have become clogged as early as 2/13/26. The emergency room personnel were unable to unclog the nasogastric tube either and the facility removed the tube on 2/17/26. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/10/26 at 10:45 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cirrhosis of the liver, ascites, acute kidney failure, anxiety, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.A nursing progress note, dated 2/14/26 at 5:57 a.m., indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin was administered according to the physician's order or new orders were documented, daily weights were obtained according to the physician's order, and cardiac medications were held according to the physician's ordered parameters for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 21, 6, 13 and 117)Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 5/7/26 at 10:15 a.m., Resident 21 indicated her blood sugars readings were up and down. The clinical record for Resident 21 was reviewed on 5/11/26 at 10:58 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and failure to thrive. A physician's order, dated 3/25/26, indicated to administer Humalog (a rapid acting insulin) according to the sliding scale and to contact the physician if the blood sugar results were over 400. The sliding scale coverage was written as follows: If the blood glucose reading was 151-200, administer 2 units If the blood glucose reading was 201-250, administer 4 units If the blood glucose…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan for a cardiac pacemaker was implemented for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for comprehensive care planning. (Resident 100)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 100 was reviewed on 5/11/26 at 2:36 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, presence of a cardiac pacemaker, congestive heart failure, and atherosclerotic heart disease.A progress note, dated 1/16/26, indicated Resident 100 was admitted to the facility. A skin assessment was completed and no skin issues other than a pacemaker were noted.An admission evaluation, dated 1/16/26, indicated Resident 100 utilized a cardiac pacemaker device.A physician's note, dated 1/19/26, indicated Resident 100's medical history included, but were not limited to, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and pacemaker dependence.Resident 100's care plans did not include her pacemaker.During an interview, on 5/12/26 at 11:55 a.m., the MDS Coordinator indicated the pacemaker was not included and should have been. She indicated there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for oxygen administration were in place for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 101)Findings include: During an observation, on 5/8/26 at 9:45 a.m., Resident 101 was observed to receive oxygen at 4.5 liters per minute via nasal cannula. The clinical record for Resident 101 was reviewed on 5/8/26 at 12:03 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pulmonary hypertension, and type 2 diabetes.A physician's order for the use of oxygen was not located at the time of the record reviewDuring an interview, on 5/12/26 at 8:14 a.m., the Director of Nursing indicated physician's orders for oxygen should have been in the record prior to the initiation of the oxygen.A current facility policy, titled Supplemental Oxygen Using Nasal Cannula, undated and received from the Director of Nursing on 5/13/26 at 8:20 a.m., indicated .Supplemental oxygen may be administered to residents via various routes including through the use of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed, revised, and developed by the interdisciplinary team for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. (Resident 27 and 19) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 27 was reviewed on 6/11/25 at 9:26 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety disorder and moderate recurrent depressive disorder. The major depressive disorder diagnosis was modified on 4/4/25. A therapist progress note, dated 4/8/25, indicated the resident had a problem of moderate recurrent major depressive episodes with a diagnosis of moderate recurrent major depressive disorder. A physician's order, dated 4/22/25, indicated to give duloxetine (an antidepressant medication) 20 mg (milligrams) at bedtime. An annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 5/2/25, indicated the resident had a diagnosis of depression and was taking an antidepressant medication. A current care plan, dated as reviewed and revised on 5/27/25, did not indicate the resident was taking an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure medications were administered according to the physician's orders for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 20 and 27) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 20 was reviewed on 6/11/25 at 2:35 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, essential primary hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and pulmonary fibrosis. A current care plan, dated 10/6/20, indicated the resident had the potential for unstable blood pressures. A physician's order, dated 4/2/25, indicated to give Lasix (a diuretic which could lower blood pressure) 20 mg (milligrams) once day with special instructions to hold the medication for a systolic blood pressure of less than 100. A Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated April 2025, indicated Lasix was given with no systolic blood pressure recorded on 4/7/25, 4/8/25, 4/9/25, 4/11/25, 4/13/25, 4/14/25, 4/15/25, 4/16/25, 4/17/25, 4/18/25, 4/21/25, 4/22/25, 4/23/25, 4/24/25, 4/25/25, 4/26/25, 4/27/25, 4/28/25, 4/29/25, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the facility policy and procedure for reconciliation of controlled medications for 2 of 3 narcotic reconciliation logs reviewed for medication storage. (3000 and 4000 units) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 6/9/25 at 10:29 a.m., with Infection Preventionist 8, the SHIFT CHANGE/CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE INVENTORY TRACKER document for the 3000-unit medication cart 1 was missing signatures to show the narcotics had been reconciled and accounted for on the following shifts: June 1, 2025, was missing a signature for the off-going nurse on the day shift. There was a missing signature for the on-coming nurse for the day shift. There was no date filled in on the form. There was a missing signature for the off-going nurse for the day shift. There was no date filled in on the form. There was a missing signature for the on-coming nurse for the day shift. There was no date filled in on the form. There was a missing signature for the off-going nurse for the day shift. There was no date filled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in their original containers, were labeled with an open date, and outdated medications were discarded in 2 of 4 medication carts (3000 and 4000 units) and in 1 of 2 medication refrigerators (4000 unit) reviewed for medication storage. (4000 Unit) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 6/9/25 at 10:29 a.m., with Infection Preventionist 8, the 3000-unit medication cart 2 was found to have the following items opened and not dated: a. one bottle of latanoprost eye drops was open and was not dated. b. one vial of Lantus insulin was open and was not dated. c. one Lantus insulin pen was open and was not dated. 2. During an observation, on 6/9/25 at 11:13 a.m., with RN 9, the 4000-unit medication cart 1 was found to have the following items opened and not dated: a. one full Lantus insulin pen was open and was not dated. b. one vial of Humalog insulin was open and was not dated. c. one half full Lantus insulin pen was open and was not dated. d. one lispro insulin pen was open and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the unit kitchen refrigerators were dated for 2 of 4 kitchenettes reviewed for food storage. (3000 and 4000 units) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 6/9/25 at 9:56 a.m., the 3000-unit kitchenette refrigerator had a white Styrofoam container for Resident 17 and a white Styrofoam container for Resident 20. Neither container had a date to show when the items were placed for storage. During an interview, on 6/9/25 at 10:01 a.m., Infection Preventionist 8 indicated the items should have been dated. 2. During an observation, on 6/9/25 at 11:55 a.m., the 4000-unit kitchenette refrigerator had a clear container with a red lid stored in the refrigerator without a name or date. There was a bag of yogurt and a container of fruit stored in the refrigerator without a name or date. There was also a container of spread for Resident 19 without a date. During an interview, on 6/9/25 at 12:00 p.m., RN 9 indicated the items should have been dated and if the items belonged to staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn in an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) room while providing care and wound care was completed according to the standard of practice for 2 of 2 residents randomly observed for infection control. (Resident 80 and 77) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 6/11/25 at 9:42 a.m., CNA 2 completed catheter care for Resident 80. CNA 2 performed catheter care from start to finish without putting on a gown and Resident 80 was in EBP. An EBP sign was posted on Resident 80's door which indicated Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), which included gowns for close contact care, was required. The clinical record for Resident 80 was reviewed on 6/13/25 at 2:58 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, obstructive and reflux uropathy, retention of urine, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease. A physician's order, dated 4/30/25, indicated Enhanced Barrier Precautions was required for Resident 80 for personal hygiene and when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN