Evergreen Crossing And The Lofts
5404 Georgetown Road, Indianapolis, IN 46254 · For profit - Corporation · 109 certified beds · (317) 291-5404 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Feb 2026
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 37% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.6% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.9% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 30.4% | 25.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.9% | 3.9% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.0% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.5% | 23.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.0% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.1% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.2% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.8% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 42.1% | 79.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.0% | 22.2% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.8% | 10.8% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 68.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.5%CMS range 36.4–64.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 8.6–16.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 68.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 45.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 3.4–13.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 109 beds and averages 93.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify wounds, and complete skin assessments for 1 of 3 residents resulting in harm when the resident developed skin breakdown on her buttocks that progressed to an unstageable pressure ulcer/injury (a full thickness tissue loss where the extent of the damage is hidden by dead tissue) that required surgical debridement and the facility failed to assess and treat a Deep Tissue Injury (a pressure-related injury to sub-cutaneous tissue under intact skin, as a result of prolonged compression of bony prominences on underlying soft tissue, particularly muscle) to the right heel for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident B). This deficient practice was corrected by 10/31/25 prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Findings include: A confidential interview conducted during the survey indicated a resident representative had been upset when Resident B had developed pressure wounds on her bottom and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure eggs were pasteurized and foods were stored safely during 1 of 3 kitchen observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 97 of 99 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include:During an initial kitchen observation, on 4/13/26 at 6:45 a.m., the following was observed with [NAME] 12. The walk-in cooler's door was propped open, and the floor was wet. [NAME] 12 indicated the floor in the walk-in was wet because the door was propped open, and it had been propped open for about 30 minutes. [NAME] 12 indicated the temperature in the walk-in was 55 degrees Fahrenheit (F) per the electronic temperature reading. [NAME] 12 was unable to find a second thermometer inside the walk-in cooler. A box of eggs with 18 remaining was observed in the walk-in cooler. The eggs were not noted to be pasteurized. There was no stamped p on the eggs and no note on the box to indicate they were pasteurized. [NAME] 12 observed the eggs and the box and confirmed there was no documentation to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received showers and bathing per their preference for 1 of 32 residents reviewed for choices (Resident 7). Findings include:During an interview, on 4/13/26 at 8:46 a.m., Resident 7 indicated he received showers twice weekly. Resident 7 indicated he wanted three showers a week. The resident did not remember the staff asking him about his shower and bathing preferences. Resident 7's record was reviewed on 4/16/26 at 12:24 p.m. Census information indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A nursing admission assessment, dated 10/31/25, indicated the resident's bathing preference was to receive a bed bath three times weekly. A care plan, last revised on 11/10/25, indicated the resident had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit. Interventions included, but were not limited to, staff provide substantial/maximal assistance with showering/bathing. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's code status and resident representative information was appropriately communicated during a transfer to the hospital for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident 59).Findings include:During an interview on [DATE] at 9:31 a.m. Resident 59's legal guardian indicated the facility called Resident 59's nephew, not her, to notify a resident representative of Resident 59's transfer to the hospital. The resident's legal guardian was not notified of Resident 59's transfer until the following Monday when the social worker from the facility called to get an update on the resident. Resident 59's legal guardian indicated once she talked to the hospital staff they indicated to her that they were told Resident 59 was a full code.On [DATE] at 11:59 a.m. Resident 59's medical record was reviewed. She was a long-term care resident whose diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) correctly when a resident was not taking an antidepressant and failed to code a resident who was edentulous (no teeth or dentures) for 2 of 20 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy (Residents 2 and 7).Findings include:1. On 4/15/26 at 1:18 p.m., a record review was completed for Resident 2. He had the following diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dementia, anxiety, diabetes, major depressive disorder, traumatic brain injury, insomnia, and kidney disease.Resident's medication orders did not include an antidepressant.Resident's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated he was prescribed an antidepressant.On 4/15/26 at 2:02 p.m., the Corporate MDS Coordinator indicated she corrected the MDS.2. During an interview, on 4/13/26 at 8:57 a.m., Resident 7 indicated he had dentures, but they had broken.Resident 7's record was reviewed on 4/16/26 at 12:24 a.m. A nursing admission assessment, dated 10/31/25, indicated the resident did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at residents' bedside for 2 of 32 residents observed for potential accidents (Residents 60 and 3). Findings include:1. On 4/13/26 at 10:08 a.m., Resident 60 was observed lying in bed. There was a cup with several oral medication pills on his bedside table. At the same time, the resident indicated the nurse brought the medications about 15 minutes earlier, and he had told them he would take them later. Resident 60's record was reviewed on 4/15/26 at 11:45 a.m. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/29/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A care plan, last revised on 2/5/26, indicated the resident had behaviors, included but not limited to, refusing medications. Interventions included, but were not limited to, administer medications as ordered. An admission nursing assessment, dated 3/25/26, indicated the resident was able to self-administer his inhaler, but not his oral medication pills. The resident's electronic record lacked documentation the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received person-centered dementia specific care and services for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dementia care services (Resident 72). Findings include:On 4/13/26 at 11:35 a.m., Resident 72 was initially observed. She was lying in bed with her eyes closed and appeared to be asleep. She wore a hospital gown, her hair was tangled, flattened on one side, and appeared to be greasy. There was a band aide on her upper right forehead with a dried dark substance around the edges and into her scalp at her hairline. Her fingernails were long and observed to have dark debris under them. Her television was on a news station. No other sensory stimulation for the resident was observed in the room. On 4/14/26 at 9:12 a.m., the Wound Nurse Practitioner (W-NP) exited Resident 72's room. She indicated they had just finished assessing and dressing a pressure, located on her sacrum. She indicated Resident 72 had experienced a significant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled and stored in 3 of 6 carts reviewed for appropriate storage and labeling of medications (Residents 100 and 112).Findings include:On 4/16/26 at 8:50 a.m. [NAME] Medication Cart 1 was observed. Resident 100 had a bottle of Sevelamer Carbonate (a prescription medication used to control high phosphorus levels in adults with chronic kidney disease) 800 milligrams (mg) that did not have a written or prescription label on it.On 4/16/26 at 9:10 a.m. [NAME] Medication Cart 2 was observed. Resident 112 had an open Budesonide and Formoterol inhaler (a combination inhaler used to manage asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) with an open date of 11/15/26.On 4/16/26 at 9:30 a.m. Heritage Medication Cart 2 was observed. An unknown resident had a bottle of liquid guaifenesin (an expectorant used to relieve chest congestion by thinning and loosening mucus in the airways) that had a pharmacy label that had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system for the reconciliation of controlled medications from 4 of 4 nursing units (Health, Heritage, [NAME] 1 and [NAME] 2), resulting in diversion of at least 60 Norco (hydrocodone-acetaminophen - a Schedule II narcotic medication) tablets from 1 of 4 nursing units reviewed for diversion of narcotics (Heritage hallways). This deficient practice was corrected by [DATE] prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance.Findings include: A Facility Reported Incident (FRI), indicated on [DATE], 2 cards of Resident L's narcotic medications, for a total of 60 tablets, were found missing from the medication cart. The Executive Director (ED), local law enforcement, consulting pharmacy, and Nurse Practitioner (NP) were notified. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 10 was suspended pending investigation and subsequently terminated. A pharmacy packing slip, dated [DATE] at 6:00 a.m., indicated Registered Nurse (RN) 11 signed for receipt…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' narcotic medications were protected from diversion resulting in 60 missing Norco (a Schedule II narcotic medication) tablets, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation (Resident L). This deficient practice was corrected by [DATE] prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance.Findings include: A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) indicated, on [DATE], two cards of Resident L's narcotic medications, for a total of 60 tablets, were found missing from the medication cart. The Executive Director (ED), local law enforcement, consulting pharmacy, and Nurse Practitioner (NP) were notified. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 10 was suspended pending investigation and subsequently terminated. Resident L's clinical record was reviewed on [DATE] at 12:31p.m. Diagnoses on Resident L's profile included, but were not limited to, radiculopathy in the cervical region (pinched nerve in the neck), fibromyalgia (chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications, painting supplies, and cleaner/degreaser sprays were secured for 3 of 3 random observations for potential accidents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 2 of 2 residents randomly observed (Residents G and N). Findings include: 1. On 12/30/25 at 11:15 a.m. Resident G was observed lying on his bed closing his eyes on and off. There was a medication cup of 5 unidentified pills observed on the over-the-bed table among the resident's personal items. The resident indicated the staff had left the medications for him to take when he wanted, and this was his usual routine. The resident deflected and changed the topic when he was asked to identify the medications. There was also a medication cup containing 2 unidentified white tablets on the bedside stand between the resident's BiPAP machine (a non-invasive ventilator used to help people breathe easier) and a push-button desk telephone, out of reach and sight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin was administered in accordance with physician's orders and by manufacturer's instructions for 3 of 3 residents observed for insulin administration (Residents B, H, and T). Findings include:1. A concern brought up during the survey indicated Resident B had complained to the staff daily about his high blood sugar readings, not getting his insulin timely, the physician not being contacted for extra insulin coverage when his blood sugar readings were high, and not receiving the proper diet to help control his diabetes. On 12/30/25 at 12:36 p.m., Resident B was observed returning to his room. The resident indicated his blood sugar readings were always high due to not getting his insulin correctly. That morning at 4:00 a.m., his blood sugar had read high which meant over 600, he had cold sweats, and the staff had responded by turning on the air conditioner but had refused to call the physician and get insulin coverage. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were personalized, implemented, and updated to include changes to wound management for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident B). This deficient practice was corrected by 10/31/25 prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Findings include:Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 11/7/25 at 2:00 p.m. Diagnoses on Resident B's profile included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis) following a cerebral infarction (stroke - death of brain tissue caused by a lack of blood flow) affecting the left dominant side, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, Parkinson's disease, encephalopathy (disfunction of the brain that caused confusion and memory loss), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A care plan for Resident B, dated 9/5/25, indicated the resident was at risk for altered skin integrity related to impaired mobility, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide or document showers for 4 of 11 residents reviewed for bathing preferences (Residents C, K, L, and N). Findings include:During the initial facility tour on 8/6/25 at 10:45 a.m., the following residents complained of not getting showers.a. On 8/6/25 at 11:22 a.m., Resident K was observed lying in bed watching TV. The resident indicated she required assistance with ADL's (activities of daily living) to include bathing, transfers out of the bed, and wheelchair (WC) mobility.On 8/8/25 at 10:52 a.m., electronic shower documentation for Resident K, dated 7/1/25 - 8/6/25, indicated the resident had received a shower on 7/23, 8/4, and 8/6. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 9 indicated, the resident had moved upstairs from Heritage hallway 2 days prior. There was no documentation to indicate Resident K had refused to have a shower.b. On 8/6/25 at 11:37 a.m., Resident L was observed wheeling herself into her room in a manual WC and stopped at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide comfortable water temperatures of more than 100 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and less than 120 degrees F in 16 of the 16 residents' bathrooms on the [NAME] 1 hallway reviewed for comfortable temperatures (Rooms 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, and 215) . Findings include: During the initial tour, on 8/6/25 at 12:03 p.m., Resident N indicated that the water in her bathroom was cold, she could not take a shower in her room, and CNA 8 had to warm up water in a basin at the nurse's station so she could be washed. A visitor observed the water being cold after having been turned on for 5 minutes. The resident indicated she had notified management more than once that her water did not always warm up after being turned on for 20 minutes.Documentation of water temperature monitoring included:a. On 7/7/25, water temperatures were 120 Fahrenheit (F) in the Health hallway nurse's station, Heritage hallway…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment on 4 of 4 hallways (Health Heritage, [NAME] 1, and [NAME] 2 hallways) observed for cleanliness. Findings include:1. A confidential interview during the survey process indicated family members had visited to find the resident's room in complete filth. The resident had multiple sheets with urine and bowel movement, and the mess had been covered up with cloth pads by the staff instead of them changing his sheets. There had been dried bowel movement on the trash can, and someone had removed the trash can liner then put a trash can liner back in on top of the dried bowel movement. There was an occurrence when the resident had a loose bowel movement, could not get staff to respond to his call light, and in attempts to clean up the mess had smeared it from the bed into the bathroom. The resident had an infectious disease, and having his bodily fluids all over the room was not hygienic. On 8/6/25 at 2:38 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms and common areas were free of flying and crawling insects, and subsequently into and landing on open food and drinks in the resident's room on 4 of 4 nursing units during random observation of resident rooms (Health, Heritage, [NAME] 1, and [NAME] 2 hallways). Findings include:On 8/6/25 at 11:16 a.m., a gnat was observed flying outside Resident Z's doorway as Housekeeper 7 mopped the floor.On 8/6/25 at 11:37 a.m., gnats were observed flying in Resident L's room as she was wheeling herself into her room in a manual WC (wheelchair). A protein shake with an expiration date of 6/26/25 and an opened container of coffee with tissue paper stuffed in the top, were sitting next to an opened bottle of wound spray that had a dried dark food substance down the side, all sitting among additional food and personal items on her dresser. There were open containers of powdered vanilla creamer, sugar, and frosted cereal on the shelves…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner when resident and staff food were co-mingled and not labeled in 3 of 4 nurse's station refrigerators observed for resident food storage, and failed to ensure resident food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner when food was left open in residents' rooms (Residents C, L, and Q) with visible gnats. Findings include: 1. During the initial tour, on 8/6/25 at 10:45 a.m., a refrigerator with a combination lock was observed in each nurse's stations. A sign printed on bright pink paper, taped to the front of each refrigerator indicated, This is for the storage of resident's food and drinks only [with name and date]. Any personal items will be thrown away.During an interview on 8/7/25 at 12:19 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 7 indicated, the nurse's stations refrigerators were for the storage of the residents' food and drinks, but sometimes staff working off hour shifts would put their food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive and individualized care plan was developed for a resident with behaviors related to wandering, adjustment to new living conditions and personal hobbies for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for elopement, (Resident 88) and failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for a resident who admitted to the facility with a trans metatarsal amputation (TMA) ( a surgical procedure that involves the removal of the distal portion of the metatarsal bones in the foot) for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident 196). Findings include: 1. On 2/24/25 at 11:36 a.m., Resident 88 was observed through his open door. He refused to allow entrance and instead of answering questions, he became agitated and demanded that he get his bicycle back. He adamantly declared he was a cyclist, his bicycle had been confiscated from him, that he was being kept against his will, and institutionalized. Resident 88 was observed to wear slick-styled nylon sports pants and wore cleats. A wanderguard bracelet was observed around his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to reassess the effectiveness of interventions and review and revise a resident's care plan (Resident 28 and Resident 241) for 2 of 23 residents reviewed for care plan revision. Findings include: 1. Resident 28's medical record was reviewed. She was a long-term care resident whose diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing.). A social service note that was a summary of a care plan meeting, dated 8/2/24, indicated they reviewed dietary concerns and Resident 28 indicated she cannot chew the food. Resident 28 had a care plan with a revision date of 9/16/24 that indicated the Resident was at nutritional risk due to poorly fitting dentures and a mechanically altered diet. The care plan lacked documentation of interventions related to the resident's complaints of chewing or swallowing noted. Resident 28 had an order, dated 9/18/24, that indicated she was on a regular texture diet. Resident 28 had a care plan with a revision date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the potential for accidents when call lights were observed out of reach, neurological checks were not completed, for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Residents 10, 142, and 15), and failed to ensure medications were not left at bedside for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 10). Findings include: 1. On 2/25/25 at 9:23 a.m., Resident 10 was observed. She was reclined in her bed with the head of the bed (HOB) slightly elevated. She held a piece of toast, but her eyes were closed, and she appeared to be asleep. A half-eaten plate of breakfast was observed on her overbed table. Her call light was observed on the floor to the left side of her bed, out of her line of sight, and out of reach. On 2/25/25 at 9:50 a.m., Resident 10's breakfast tray had been removed, but her call light remained on the floor. On 2/26/25 at 9:58 a.m., Resident 10 was observed. She sat on the right edge of her low air loss mattress, her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident without teeth or dentures was provided interventions to ensure the resident was able to eat and did not have significant weight loss of 11 percent over 6 months for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 28). Findings include: On 2/24/25 at 10:52 a.m., Resident 28 was observed as she sat up in her bed, she appeared thin and petite in stature. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 12 was in the room checking to see if she had eaten her lunch. LPN 12 indicated Resident 28's family had brought her lunch before she left the resident's room. Resident 28 had her over the bed table in front of her with a Styrofoam tray with several pieces of fried catfish, fried whole chicken wings, and other assorted fried sides on it. Resident 28 indicated she could not eat the food in front of her because it was too hard for her to chew. Resident 28 opened her mouth to show that she had no natural teeth and did not have dentures in place. The resident indicated she had dentures, but she had not had them for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to hold medications when a resident's vital signs were outside of the ordered parameters for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 196, 59, and 195). Findings include: 1. On 2/26/25 at 11:27 a.m., a record review was completed for Resident 196. He had the following diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, trans metatarsal amputation (TMA), hypertension, left above the knee amputation, and major depressive disorder. He had an order, dated 1/29/25, for metoprolol succinate (a blood pressure medication) extended release oral tablet 24 hour, 25 milligrams (mg) to give 1 tablet in the evening every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. The medication was to be held for systolic less than 110 and/or pulse less than 60. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated Resident 196 was given the medication on 2/3/25 when his blood pressure was 102/83, on 2/5/25 when his blood pressure was 110/68, and on 2/7/25 when his blood pressure was 93/58. On 2/17/25, 2/19/25, 2/21/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to date multi-dose vials of tuberculin serum and failed to remove expired insulins from the medication cart for 2 of 3 refrigerators observed for medication storage and 1 of 3 medication carts observed for medication storage. Findings include: On [DATE] at 10:22 a.m., the Health unit medication room refrigerator was observed. A vial of Aplisol (tuberculin serum) was in the refrigerator with no date to indicate when it was opened. Health unit medication cart number 2 contained 2 insulin pens belonging to Resident 26. One insulin pen Semglee (insulin) 100 unit/ml opened on [DATE] and the other was Lispro (insulin) 100 unit/ml opened on [DATE]. Heritage unit medication room refrigerator had a vial of Tubersol (tuberculin serum) 5 unit/0.1mg with no date to indicate when it was opened. During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 7, she indicated the insulin pens were only good for 30 days. A policy titled, Storage of Medications, was provided by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change in a reesident's condition related to the development of new impairments to their skin for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident B and D). Findings include: 1. On 11/15/24 at 10:35 a.m., Resident B's medial record was reviewed. She was a long-term care resident with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia (a degenerative brain disease which affects memory and cognitive functioning), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease which makes it hard to breath), and hypertensive (high blood pressure) heart disease. Resident B had a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/1/24, which indicated she discharged with a new unstageable (full-thickness pressure injuries in which the base is obscured by slough and/or eschar) pressure ulcer. A nursing progress note, dated 10/18/24 at 4:27 p.m., indicated a CNA notified the nurse of a new wound. The nurse assessed and cleansed the area, then notified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of a new pressure ulcer for a resident with a history of pressure ulcers and ensure timely assessment and treatment of the new pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident B) . Findings include: On 11/15/24 at 9:55 a.m., Resident B was observed in her room. She was in her bed with the head of her bed (HOB) elevated at approximately a 45-degree angle, and she was positioned on her left side with pillows propped under her right hip/buttock area. She was awake and alert to herself only as she was pleasantly confused and unable to engage in conversation or answer yes/no questions. During an interview on 11/15/24 at 10:00 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 67 indicated, Resident B had recently returned from the hospital after she had been sent out for the wound. LPN 67 indicated she had not worked with Resident B for a while since she had been off work and the resident was in the hospital, but LPN 67 was surprised to learn that her wound had gotten bad so…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' discharge instructions accurately reflected their reconciled medications to ensure residents were sent home with an accurate quantity of medications for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge (Resident B and D). Findings include: 1. On 3/6/24 at 11:00 a.m., a comprehensive record review was completed for Resident B. He had the following diagnoses which included but not limited to peripheral vascular disease (PVD, a slow and progressive circulation disorder), type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia (HLD), morbid obesity, right above knee amputation (AKA), and polyneuropathy (a condition in which a person's peripheral nerves are damaged). Resident discharged from the facility on 2/1/24. He was discharged to the community. A medication discharge form was present in the record. Three medications lacked a quantity of the medication that was sent with him. The medications were 1. Ozempic (a medication used weekly to treat diabetes), 2. NovoLog pen (insulin), and 3. insulin glargine solution (used to treat diabetes).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances that had been filed on behalf of a resident were documented, followed up with, and resolved for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for grievances (Resident D). Findings include: During a confidential interview, it was indicated, Resident D's family had voiced their concerns related to Resident D's care many times and to many staff members. On 2/6/24 at 10:35 a.m., Resident D's medical record was reviewed. The record lacked documentation of Grievance Forms being filed regarding the resident. On 2/7/24 at 8:13 a.m., grievances related to Resident D were requested. On 2/7/24 at 12:05 p.m., the Executive Director (ED) provided 1 Grievance Form dated 1/5/24. The ED indicated the Director of Nursing kept separate documentation in nurses' notes related to her direct follow up with Resident D and his family. The family provided a copy of a grievance filed on 11/7/23 which indicated, .[Resident D] was found in the bed completely saturated in urine up to the middle of his back (t-shirt) as well as stool (loose)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications and wound treatment solutions were secured in the public hallway and in the resident rooms (Resident 11, 18, 5, and 21). Findings include: 1. On 12/11/23 at 9:40 a.m., Dakin's solution (denatures protein, loosening slough and rendering it more easily removed from the wound .improves the mechanical debridement due to the desiccative nature of Dakin's solution and adhesion of tissue to each gauze used) bottle was observed on her bedside table. On 12/12/23 at 2:44 p.m., Resident 18's record was reviewed. She was admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stage four (bone exposed) pressure ulcer of the sacral region, it was present on admission. A physician order, dated 7/26/23, indicated to cleanse her sacrum with wound cleanser or normal saline (NS) and pat dry. Apply collagen particles to wound bed, cover with calcium alginate AG and cover with bordered foam daily and as needed (PRN) for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to distribute food under sanitary conditions by performing proper hand hygiene during meal service for 9 of 9 residents in the Lofts dining room (several unidentified residents and Resident 64). B. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to distribute, serve food, and store used room trays under sanitary conditions and perform proper hand hygiene during meal service for 13 of 13 residents receiving meal tray in their room on the Lofts 2 hallway. C. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions for use of an ice chest on the Lofts 2 hallway for 1 of 1 random observation (Resident 13). Findings include: A. On 12/11/23, during a continuous observation, from 12:44 p.m. to 12:59 p.m., Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) 89 was observed. At 12:44 p.m., she pulled up the sleeves on her clinical jacket. She did not gel or wash her hands. She was waiting for Dietary Aide (DA) 35 to fill a resident's plate. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to care for a resident in a manner that preserved the resident's dignity when she did not receive incontinence care in a timely manner for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident F). Findings include, During a random observation on [DATE] at 11:52 a.m., Resident F was observed lying in bed, head of the bed in high position, the resident had slid down, pink silk-like nightgown bunched around her waist, and covers over her lower legs. The resident was observed wearing a saturated adult brief, and there was a strong smell of urine permeating the room. The resident indicated she had used her call light to summons staff at 8:30 a.m. before breakfast was served to assist her as she was incontinent of both urine and stool, but she was still waiting to be changed. The television (tv) remote was observed on the floor on the back side of the bed with the back off and batteries on the floor, she was holding the remote to the bed, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective interventions were in place to prevent a resident, (Resident E) from developing new pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene and application of the correct treatment were provided during a wound treatment observation (Resident 18) for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: A. An anonymous complaint indicated, .Resident E admitted to the facility with no skin issues and left with 5 wounds. On 12/13/23 at 10:08 a.m., Resident E's medical record was reviewed. She admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, end stage hypertensive kidney disease and heart failure. An admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] indicated, Resident E did not have and open areas, but was at risk for the development of pressure ulcers.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident 41) who had a history of weight loss was provided with the appropriate supplemental health shake and was served meals according to her preferences for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: On 12/11/23 at 10:09 a.m., Resident 41 was observed in her room. She sat of the edge of her bed with an over-bed table in front of her. Resident 41 indicated she did not like breakfasts because she always got eggs, or stuff with gravy and she did not like gravy. She was supposed to get a milkshake twice a day, but sometimes she didn't and did not like the flavor they had. She would prefer strawberry, or banana flavored. No supplement shake or banana was observed at that time. On 12/11/23 at 12:06 p.m., Resident 41 had a visitor, and she indicated she had offered her lunch since she did not like what it was. Resident 41 and her visitor indicated she had not been offered an alternative when she complained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/14/2018 |
| GEORGETOWN MGT CO LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2017 |
| LONG, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/14/2018 |
| MUSTAKLEM, MARWAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/10/2025 |
| ODENTHAL, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2017 |
| SPALL, AMANDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/19/2015 |
| BOND, MARIA | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| CLARK, TIMOTHY | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2015 |
| DAUGHERTY, JOSHUA | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| FELKER, DEAN | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2015 |
| JOYNER, SARA | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| WILLARD, LACEY | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2022 |
| WILSON, ROY | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2015 |
| OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2017 |
| OMG IN MSTR LSCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/10/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $5.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 37% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155826. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.