No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

1390 King Tree Drive, Dayton, OH 45405 · For profit - Corporation · 180 certified beds · (937) 278-0723 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0602, F0603) — most recent Apr 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$85,284 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0602, F0603) — most recent Apr 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $85,284 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-02)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
1435 Shoup Mill Rd · (937) 277-6595 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens1.0 mi
4855 N Main St · (937) 279-0468 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4233 N Main St · (937) 496-5866 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1301 E Siebenthaler Ave · (937) 277-6545 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.2%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.1%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.3%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.5%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.6%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication40.3%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.9%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.6%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.3%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.4%75.6%79.4%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.85
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.99
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
32.0%
Total nursing turnover
23.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 163.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-02)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2022-06-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, interviews with staff, residents, and family, review of video footage from electronic monitoring device, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent two cognitively impaired residents (#49 and #160) from continuing to engage in sexually aggressive behaviors in the female resident's room (#160). This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious, physical, mental, and/or psychosocial negative outcomes for two residents (#49 and #160) when the facility failed to supervise and intervene to prevent Resident #49 from entering Resident #160's room and engaging in sexual activity. On 04/28/25, Resident #49 entered Resident #160's room numerous times throughout the day. Resident #49 was observed touching Resident #160's breast outside the shirt and kissing her lips. After numerous times of Resident #49 entering and leaving Resident #160's room, the residents were observed engaging in oral sex on each other. At no time was staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interviews, review of facility investigation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was properly transferred from the bed to the wheelchair. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #04 was transferred without the use of a Hoyer (mechanical lift) by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #200 and the resident sustained a left femoral head fracture requiring hospital admission and surgical repair. This affected one (#04) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 169. Findings include: Review of Resident #04's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/07/05. Diagnoses listed included convulsions anxiety disorder, psychotic disorder, decreased mobility, and legal blindness. Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #04 was severely cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of the facility investigation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision and assistance with resident transfers which resulted in Actual Harm on 06/03/24 when Resident #66 was transferred out of a shower chair into bed by two staff members without the use of a Hoyer lift as ordered, resulting in the resident sustaining a fracture to the left humerus during the transfer. This affected one (Resident #66) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 169 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 09/03/20 with a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. Review of the care plan for Resident #66 dated 11/10/23 revealed staff should use a Hoyer lift for all transfers with the assistance of two staff. Review of physician's orders for Resident #66 revealed an order dated 02/12/24 for the resident to transfer using Hoyer lift with the assistance of two staff.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of documentation from an employment agency, review of documentation from Board of Executives of Long-Term Services and Supports (BELTSS), interview with Board Administrator at BELTSS, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Administrator had a valid Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) license. This had the potential to affect all the residents. The facility census was 164. Interview on 08/05/25 at 10:09 A.M. with Regional Director of Operations (RDO) #750 confirmed the facility had employed interim NHA #630 from 05/12/25 through 06/10/25. RDO #750 stated interim NHA #630 had been hired through an employment agency and provided documentation interim #630 had an active NHA license. Interview on 08/06/25 at 4:15 P.M. with Board Administrator #635 stated BELTSS was notified of a concern about the validity of interim NHA #630's license. Board Administrator #635 stated after an investigation it was determined that interim NHA #630 had used the license number for NHA ##700 to obtain a position…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-02 · tag F0574 — pattern
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Council Minutes, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents had access to the state and local advocacy organizations. This affected three residents (#117, #59 and #128) and all residents residing on the South and [NAME] units. The census was 164.Review of the monthly Resident Council Minutes from 08/15/24 through 07/07/25 revealed there was no evidence the state or local advocacy group contacts were reviewed at monthly Resident Council meetings. Observation on 08/07/25 at 2:30 P.M. of secured [NAME] and South units revealed no evidence of postings or available documents of state or local advocacy group contacts. Interviews with Residents #128, #59 and #117 during a surveyor led Resident Council Meeting on 08/05/25 at 2:06 P.M. revealed they did not know of any contact information of state or local advocacy groups. The residents stated in monthly Resident Council meetings, the state or local advocacy groups were not reviewed. The residents stated they would like to know the contact information and, in the past, had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This affected five (Residents #14, #36, #20, #65, and #112) of nine residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 164.1.Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 11/25/24 with medical diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and hypertension. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/16/25, which indicated Resident #14 was cognitively intact and required supervision with toilet hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers, and partial/moderate staff assistance with bathing. Observation and interview on 08/05/25 at 7:25 A.M. revealed water leaking from the toilet in Resident #14's bathroom onto the bathroom floor, floor in the room outside of bathroom, and to the threshold of the room to the hallway. Resident #14 stated the toilet had been leaking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-02 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Council Minutes, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure concerns were addressed in a timely manner or resolved. This affected three residents (#117, #59 and #128) of three residents reviewed for Resident Council Meetings. The census was 164. Review of the monthly Resident Council Minutes from 08/15/24 through 07/07/25 revealed the following concerns: 08/15/24 missing clothing, multiple food concerns by individual residents.10/07/24 call light response, missing clothing.11/18/24 multiple food concerns by multiple residents.12/10/24 multiple food concerns by multiple residents.03/03/25 food condiments missing, multiple food concerns by multiple residents, missing clothing.04/07/25 missing clothing, call light response time.05/12/25 missing clothing concerns by multiple residents, multiple food concerns by multiple residents.06/02/25 multiple food concerns by multiple residents, missing clothing.07/07/25 food condiments, multiple food concerns by multiple residents, missing clothing. Review of Grievance Logs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records and staff interviews, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse to the State Agency (SA). This affected two (#49 and #160) residents of ten reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 164.Review of the medical record for Resident #160 revealed an admission date of 06/01/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder, dementia, and anxiety disorder.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #160 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four. This resident was assessed to require setup with eating, supervision with toileting and transfers, and partial assistance with dressing.Review of the care plan for Resident #160 revealed she was not care planned for sexually inappropriate behaviors.Review of the progress note dated 04/28/25 at 4:25 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records and staff interviews, the facility failed to timely investigate an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse. This affected two (#49 and #160) residents of ten reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 164.Review of the medical record for Resident #160 revealed an admission date of 06/01/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder, dementia, and anxiety disorder.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #160 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four. This resident was assessed to require setup with eating, supervision with toileting and transfers, and partial assistance with dressing.Review of the care plan for Resident #160 revealed she was not care planned for sexually inappropriate behaviors.Review of the progress note dated 04/28/25 at 4:25 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #491 knocked on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-02 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed accurately upon admission. This affected one (#07) resident out of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 164.Review of the medical record for Resident #07 revealed an admission date of 10/18/24 with medical diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bipolar disorder, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the medical record for Resident #07 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/09/25, which indicated Resident #07 was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate staff assistance with toilet hygiene, supervision with bed mobility and transfers, and set-up assistance with eating and bathing. Review of the medical record for Resident #07 revealed a PASARR dated 10/10/24 which revealed a diagnosis of panic or other severe anxiety disorder was documented. Review of the PASARR revealed no other mental health diagnoses were indicated.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans in a timely manner. This affected two (Residents #160 and #49) of 32 residents sampled for care plans. The census was 165. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #160 revealed an admission date of 06/01/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder, dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #160 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four. This resident was assessed to require setup with eating, supervision with toileting and transfers, and partial assistance with dressing. Review of the care plan for Resident #160 revealed she was not care planned for sexually inappropriate behaviors. Review of the progress note dated 04/28/25 at 4:25 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #491 knocked on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to monitor a resident's weight as ordered. This affected one (#01) resident out of four residents reviewed for nutritional status. The facility census was 164.Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed an admission date of 07/09/19 with medical diagnoses of left hemiplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, left above the knee amputation (AKA), hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #01 had discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility 07/08/25. Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/18/25, which indicated Resident #01 was cognitively intact and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene, bathing, and bed mobility. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #01 did not transfer and did not indicate any weight loss. Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure enteral feeding supplies were replaced according to professional standards. This affected one (Resident #11) of two residents sampled for enteral feedings. The census was 164.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, unspecified major depressive disorder, unspecified moderate dementia with psychotic disturbance, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had severely impaired dementia, had self-directed behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Review of the care plan dated 02/24/23 revealed Resident #11 had g-tube status. Interventions included administer medications via g-tube per orders, administer flushes as per protocol, enhanced barrier precautions, check for placement and residuals, and provide tube feeding as ordered. Review of the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, Nurse Practitioner (NP) interview, and policy review, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered which resulted in a significant medication error. This affected one (#02) resident out four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 164. Review of the medical record for Resident #02 revealed an admission date of 02/09/23 with medical diagnoses of right hemiplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end stage renal disease, dependence on dialysis, and bipolar disorder. Review of the medical record for Resident #02 revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/07/25, which indicated Resident #02 was cognitively intact and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene, showers/bathes, transfers and bed mobility. Review of the medical record for Resident #02 revealed a physician order dated 11/30/24 for Midodrine (hypotension medication) oral tablet 2.5 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth every eight hours as needed for hypotension. Hold if systolic blood pressure (SBP) is greater than 110 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, review of facility policy and review of online resources from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect all 44 Residents (#128, #129, #130, #131, #132, #133, #134, #135, #136, #137, #138, #139, #140, #141, #142, #143, #144, #145, #146, #147, #148, #149, #150, #151, #152, #153, #154, #155, #156, #157, #158, #159, #160, #161, #162, #163, #164, #165, #166, #167, #168, #169, #170, and #171) who resided on the 200-hall (East). The facility census was 172. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #128 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, polyneuropathy, schizoaffective disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, and edema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #128 had impaired cognition. Resident #128 required supervision from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment. This affected four (#10, #128, #138, and #149) out of the five residents reviewed. The facility census was 172. Findings include, 1) Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, hypertension, squamous cell carcinoma, schizoaffective disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety disorder, conversion disorder, dysphasia, bipolar disorder, osteoarthritis, and major depressive disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10, dated 07/18/24, revealed she was mildly cognitively impaired. Resident #10 required supervision for activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation of Resident #10's on 09/24/24 at 8:50 A.M., revealed the resident was lying in bed. There was an oxygen concentrator across the room with an attached nasal cannula laying across the floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect. This affected two (#70 and #73) out of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 172. Findings include: 1) Review of medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission dated of 08/26/24 and expired at the facility with hospice services in place on 10/01/24. Diagnoses included, amnesia, malignant neoplasm of bone, chronic hepatitis, essential primary hypertension, chronic kidney disease, hydronephrosis, anemia, gout, vascular dementia, anxiety, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), and dysphasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #70, dated 09/02/24, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #70 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation of Resident #70 on 09/26/24 at 9:59 A.M. revealed the resident was seated in a wheelchair at a table in the common area for other residents. Resident #70 was only wearing a hospital type gown that was hanging…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's guardian and physician were notified timely following a change in condition. This affected one (#10) out of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 172. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, hypertension, squamous cell carcinoma, schizoaffective disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety disorder, conversion disorder, insomnia, dysphasia, bipolar disorder, osteoarthritis, and major depressive disorder. The resident had a guardian on file. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10, dated 07/18/24, revealed the resident mildly cognitively impaired. Resident #10 required supervision for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of a census record for Resident #149, revealed the resident was moved to Resident #10's room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This affected one (#68) of the five residents reviewed for dining. The facility census was 172. Findings include: Record review for Resident #68 revealed she was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anemia, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, anxiety, Alzheimer's disease, insomnia, sleep antenna, essential primary hypertension, and dysphasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #68 had impaired cognition. Resident #68 required supervision from staff with eating. Observation of the main dining room on 10/01/24 at 12:39 P.M. revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #348 deliver a food tray to Resident #68. STNA #328 removed her N-95 respirator and used her teeth to open a package of ranch dressing for Resident #68. STNA #328 handed the package…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment. This affected seven (Residents #34, #170, #153, #136, #10, #131, and #171) of seven residents reviewed for homelike environment. The census was 170. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 08/28/24 at 12:45 P.M., Resident #34;s room had an outlet behind the head of the bed that was dangling on the wall. During an interview at the time of the observation, Resident #34 stated she reported it to the maintenance man and he didn't come and fix it. During an interview on on 08/28/24 at 3:00 P.M., Maintenance Man (MM) #252 confirmed the resident told him about the dangling outlet and he had not fixed it yet. 2. During an observation on 08/28/24 at 1:03 P.M., Resident #170's had a brown substance on the floor, the top of the heater was rusted, the wall in the bathroom had holes by the paper towel holder and a light bulb was out. The paint on the ceiling was peeling. 3. During an observation on 08/28/24 at 1:10 P.M., Resident #153's room had scuff marks by the right side of her bed and the window…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-05 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a refrigerator was provided for residents to use if they wished. This affected six (Residents #71, #43, #69, #173, #88 and #90) of six residents reviewed for the storage of resident food. The census was 170. Findings include: During an interview on 09/04/24 at 1:11 P.M., Resident #88 stated her family brought in a bottle of homemade lemonade. She asked the kitchen if they could keep it cold for her and they said yes. She stated an aide brought the lemonade back to her and yelled at her because the lemonade was in the kitchen. She said she had to throw out the lemonade. She stated there wasn't a place to store something cold for the residents. During an interview on 09/04/24 at 1:24 P.M., Resident #173 stated there was a refrigerator at the nursing station, but there was limited space for resident's food and the residents aren't permitted to have appliances in their rooms. During an interview on 09/04/24 at 2:35 P.M., Resident #71 stated she had bottles of soda sitting in her room. She stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was able to use his electric wheelchair and failed to ensure a resident could leave the building unattended. This affected one (Resident #173) of one resident reviewed for resident rights. The facility census was 170. Findings include: 1a. Record review revealed Resident #173 was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included a stroke with left sided weakness. Resident #173 was his own person. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/01/24, revealed Resident #173 was cognitively intact. He needed set-up or clean-up assistance for eating, dependent or toileting, partial/moderate assistance for bed mobility and transfers. He had no behaviors. Review of a progress note dated 07/26/23 revealed Resident #173 was observed on multiple occasions driving his electric wheelchair to unauthorized areas on facility grounds including driveways, shipping and receiving area, rummaging through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were treated with dignity and respect. This affected three (Residents #153, #143 and #39) of three residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 170. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #153 was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included peripheral autonomic neuropathy and heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/14/24, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of functional status revealed she was set-up or clean-up assistance for eating, supervision or touching assistance for toileting, bed mobility, and for transfers. During an observation on 08/28/24 at 1:10 P.M., Resident #153 came to the nursing station and asked Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #363 for a bottle of shampoo out of the shower room. The nurse told the resident to go back to her room and she would get the shampoo when she could, and stated there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview the facility failed to ensure choices were respected. This affected one (Resident #27) of one resident reviewed for choices. The facility census was 170. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE]. Her medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal failure, and diabetes. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/20/24, revealed Resident #27 was cognitively intact. She required supervision/touching assistance for eating, substantial/maximal assistance for bed mobility, transfers and toileting. During an observation on 09/05/24 at 6:48 A.M., Resident #27 was asleep with her head on the dining room table with her pillow under her head. During an interview on 09/05/24 at 6:49 A.M., State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #283 stated she got the resident up at about 6:00 A.M. because she is on the list of residents who need to get up before first shift comes to work.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident cleansed in the proper manner after he was incontinent. This affected one (Resident #137) of three residents reviewed for incontinence. The facility census was 170. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #137 was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, diabetes and non-Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/06/24, revealed Resident #137 was severely cognitively impaired. He was dependent for eating, toileting, bed mobility and transfers was not assessed on this assessment. He was always incontinent for bowel and bladder. During observation on 08/28/24 at 7:44 A.M., State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #309 performed incontinent care on Resident #135. STNA #309 pulled down the incontinent brief and washed down each side of the perineum. She turned him over and situated the clean incontinent brief. She didn't cleanse the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was medicated for pain during a dressing change. This affected one (Resident #50) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified four residents with pressures ulcers in the facility. Th census was 170. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #50 was admitted on [DATE]. His medical diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, and renal disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/13/24, revealed Resident #50 was moderately cognitively impaired. He was impaired for his upper and lower extremities. He was dependent for toileting and bed mobility. He was a Hoyer lift for transfers. During an observation on 09/04/24 at 12:48 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #275 completed a dressing change to the resident's left heel with assistance from the Director of Nursing (DON). LPN #275 tried to reposition the resident in the chair and he said I am…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #169) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 169 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #169 revealed an admission date of 07/18/24 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pressure ulcer of sacral region. Review of the preadmission paperwork from Resident #169's prior skilled nursing facility dated 07/18/24 revealed the resident was to receive the following medications: aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) once daily, lisinopril 10 mg at bedtime for hypertension, hold if systolic blood pressure was less than 110 or if pulse was less than 60, methocarbamol 750 mg every six hours. Review of the admitting physician's orders for Resident #169 dated 07/18/24 and transcribed from the preadmission paperwork provided by the resident's previous facility revealed the order for aspirin was omitted and was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff accurately documented the administration of a resident's narcotic medications in the medical record. This affected one (#802) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 172. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #802 revealed an admission date of 03/05/24 with diagnoses of paraplegia, incomplete, and pain in thoracic spine. Review of the plan of care dated 03/06/24 revealed Resident #802 is a paraplegic and to administer medications per medical providers orders and to observe for side effects and effectiveness. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #802 cognitively intact. Review of physician's order dated 03/07/24 revealed and order for Oxycodone HCl Oral Capsule 5 milligram (mg) give 2 capsules by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain. Review of the Narcotic Sheet for Oxycodone HCl Oral Capsule 5 milligram (mg) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident met criteria for admission to the facility's secure unit and was in the least restrictive environment available. This affected one (#6) of three residents reviewed who resided in the secure or locked unit. The census was 173. Findings include: Review of Resident #6's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 02/09/24. Diagnoses listed include anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, hypokalemia, and hypertension. Resident #6 was transferred to a local hospital on [DATE] for stroke like symptoms and had not returned to the facility. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 13 out of a possible 15. Resident #6 was not having hallucinations or delusions, was not verbally of physically aggressive towards others, and had not wandered. Review of behavioral hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, policy review, and review of the Agency for Clinical Innovation Urology Network, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered treatments were completed for surgical and non pressure wounds; failed to accurately monitor and asses wounds; and provide care and treatment of a resident with a nephrostomy tube. This affected three (#50, #51, and #157) residents out of the four residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 170. Findings included: 1. Review of the Resident #51's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/23/23, with medical diagnoses of pulmonary fibrosis, Hepatitis C, right hip necrosis wound status post right hip antibiotic hip spacer, psychosis, and osteoarthritis. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #51 discharged to the hospital on [DATE] for right hip arthroplasty and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #51 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered pressure wound treatments were completed. This affected one ( #50) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 170. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #50 revealed admission date of 07/9/19, with diagnoses including stroke, spastic hemiplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, contracture of right and left wrist and urinary retention. The resident was admitted to hospice on 01/02/24. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed dependent for bed mobility, transfers and toileting hygiene. Review of the wound note dated 01/25/24, for Resident #50 revealed an unstageable sacral wound measuring 6.8 centimeters (cm) by (x) 6.0 cm x 0.2 cm and unstageable left buttock wound measuring 3.0 cm x 2.9 cm x 0.3 cm. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 12/21/23, to cleanse sacrum with wound cleanser, pat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of the Agency for Clinical Innovation Urology Network website, the facility failed to ensure staff was educated and trained to provide care for a nephrostomy tube. This affected one (#50) of one resident in the facility identified as having a nephrostomy tube. The facility census was 170. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 07/9/19, with diagnoses including stroke, spastic hemiplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, contracture of right and left wrist and urinary retention. The resident was admitted to hospice on 01/02/24. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was cognitive intact and was dependent for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting hygiene. Review of the progress note dated 01/30/24 revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #318 documented at 3:56 P.M. she discovered a large amount of urine on the mattress of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interviews and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration. This affected two (#52 and #56) of six residents records reviewed for medications. The facility census was 170. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #52 revealed admission date of 06/26/23, with diagnoses including stroke, anxiety, and hepatic (liver) failure. Review of the physician orders for Resident #52 revealed an order for Rifaximin 550 milligram (mg) one tablet every morning and at bedtime with a start date of 09/20/23. Observation on 01/30/24 at 10:13 A.M., of medication administration by Registered Nurse (RN) #318 for Resident #52 revealed Rifaximin (a medication for hepatic encephalopathy) 550 milligrams (mg) was not in the medication cart and not administered. Interview with RN #318, at the time of the observation, revealed the medication was not ordered timely and voiced a concern for the frequency medication was unavailable at the facility. 2. Review of the medical record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, policy review, and [NAME] journal review, the facility failed to change gloves and/ or wash hands between cleansing wound and applying treatment; and change gloves between different wounds to prevent possible cross contamination. This affected one (#157) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 170. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #157 revealed admission date of 07/27/23, with diagnoses including bilateral at knee level amputation and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required supervision for eating and supervision, dependent for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting hygiene. Observation on 01/31/24 at 1:03 P.M., of wound treatment revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #304 cleansed the midline abdominal dehisced wound with a wound cleanser, patted dry with a four (4) by (x) 4 gauze.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate staff assistance when transferring a resident who required two persons assist with transfers resulting in a fall without injuries. This affected one (#58) out of the three residents reviewed for mechanical (hoyer) lift transfers. The facility census was 166. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed an admission date of 04/30/23 with medical diagnoses of chronic pain, chronic Hepatitis C, hyperlipidemia, and protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit care plan, dated 05/01/23, which indicated Resident #58 was dependent (helper does all the effort or two or more helpers assist) for chair/bed to chair transfers, for tub/shower transfers, and for rolling to left and right while in bed. Review of the ADL care plan revealed an intervention was initiated on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were followed when administering medications. This affected one (#53) out of the two residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 166. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 07/09/19 with medical diagnoses of history of cerebral infarction with left sided hemiplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease stage II, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #53 was cognitively intact and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene, bathing, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed physician orders dated 12/13/23 for senna 8.6 milligram (mg) by mouth two times per day, gabapentin 300 mg by mouth three times per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and investigation, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of the resident's funds by staff. This affected one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation and abuse. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 02/11/23. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy, Alzheimer's disease, dementia with behaviors, and heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had impaired cognition. Review of the facility's SRI control number 238137 revealed Resident #1 alleged her debit card was misappropriated on 08/15/23. Resident #1 stated there were $1,839.52 spent on her debit card and she did not authorize the use of her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for residents. This affected five Residents (#3, #30, #48, #63, and #155) of five residents reviewed for environment. The census was 168. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/11/22. Diagnoses included alcohol abuse, altered mental status, hypertension, and schizoaffective disorder. Resident #63 was assessed as being cognitively intact and requiring supervision for activities of daily living (ADLs) in a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. Observation of Resident #63's bathroom on 06/13/22 at 10:34 A.M. revealed a small waste basket filled with what appeared to be human waste. The bathroom had a very pervasive odor and gnats were observed flying in the room. The toilet was full of human waste and toilet paper. The toilet and sink were covered in debris. During observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Record review of Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 07/20/17 with pertinent diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with exacerbation, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, acquired absence of left leg below knee, chronic combined systolic congestive and heart failure, delusional disorders, gastroesophagael reflux disease, schizophrenia, peripheral vascular diseases, hyperlipidemia, allergic rhinits, lactose intolerance, brief psychotic disorder, insomnia, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of the 03/14/22 annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance for bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. He uses a walker, wheelchair and prosthetic limb to aid in mobility. The Resident was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Further review of Resident #35's medical record revealed no documented instance of care conferences. Interview on 6/13/22 at 11:10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner. This affected all residents but two residents (#38 and #129) residing in the facility who received meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 168. Findings include: Observations on 06/13/22 from 9:03 A.M. through 9:21 A.M. of the kitchen revealed the following: • Nine liquid pasteurized egg cartons sitting in at least a half-inch liquid substance, milky white in color, on a large metal tray in the refrigerator. • Three containers of tenacious tonic pumpable powders in dry storage room with an expiration date of May 2022. Interview on 06/13/22 with Registered Dietician #232 verified the above findings and discarded the items. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage: Dry Goods, dated September 2017 revealed all dry goods will be appropriately stored in accordance with the FDA Food code. All items will be stored on shelves at least six inches above the floor. The Dining Services Director or designee regularly inspects the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-23 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to issue appropriate Medicare beneficiary liability protection notices to residents. This affected two Residents (#39 and #60) of two reviewed for receiving Medicare Part A services. The census was 168. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/21/21. Diagnoses included type II diabetes, schizoaffective disorder, and delusional disorders. Review of a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) dated 02/08/22 revealed Resident #39 was being cut from Medicare services on 02/10/22. Further review of Resident #39's medical record revealed she remained in the facility after 02/10/22. There was no documentation of Resident #39 being issued a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN). 2. Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed an admission dated of 11/07/19. Diagnoses listed included bipolar disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, and anxiety disorder. Further review of Resident #39's medical record revealed he received Medicare part…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-23 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide bed hold notices to resident/resident representatives within 24-hours of transferring the resident to the hospital. This affected one (#129) of six residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 168. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #129 revealed an admission date of 07/09/19. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, spastic hemiplegia affecting left non-dominant side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage four, generalized anxiety disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #129 had mild cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight. The resident was assessed to require two-person extensive assistance with dressing and toileting, one-person extensive assistance with eating, and two-person total…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and medical record review, the facility failed to monitor acceptance of nutritional supplements. This affected one (Resident #48) of four residents reviewed for nutritional supplements. The facility identified 14 residents with unplanned significant weight loss or gain. The facility census was 163. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #48 revealed resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, alcohol induced persisting dementia, schizophrenia, high blood pressure, high cholesterol and reflux disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/27/19, revealed Resident #48 had impaired cognition. Review of recorded weights for Resident #48 revealed 04/01/19 was 126.5 pounds (lbs.), 03/04/19 was 133 lbs., 02/19/19 was 130 lbs., 02/04/19 was 132 lbs., 01/11/19 was 131.5 lbs., 12/01/18 was 145 lbs. and 11/11/18 was 144 lbs. Review of the dietary progress notes for Resident #48 dated 04/02/19 revealed a weight loss of 6.5 lbs. in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interview, review of facility policy and medical record review, the facility failed to monitor and assess for new onset of pain. This affected one (Resident #137) of one resident reviewed for pain management. The facility identified 67 residents on a pain management program. The facility census was 163. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #137 revealed an admission date of 07/20/17. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, paranoid schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/05/19, revealed Resident #137 had intact cognition. Review of the plan of care for Resident #137, with an initiation date of 11/18/18 and a revision on 03/28/19, revealed a potential for pain due to diabetic complications to circulation, morbid obesity and stress to joints of lower extremities and back. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered and monitor effectiveness and side effects, complete pain assessment on admission, quarterly and with significant change in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to asses and monitor the resident's vital signs before and after dialysis. This affected one (Resident #34) of one resident reviewed for dialysis treatment. The facility identified two residents receiving dialysis services. The facility census was 163. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 02/15/17. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/11/19, revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident was also coded as receiving dialysis on the MDS. Review of the dialysis plan of care with an initiation date of 02/17/17 revealed Resident #34 received hemodialysis related to renal failure. Interventions include administration medication as ordered, check dressing for bleeding and reinforce as needed, check the present of pulses, color and temperature of left upper extremity every shift, monitor for bruit and thrill every shift and before and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-02 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dental recommendations were scheduled/provided in a timely manner. This affected one (#10) of four residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 163. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/15/19, revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of a dental consult, dated 08/07/18, revealed Resident #10 was assessed by a dentist and a recommendation was made for lower teeth extractions due to decay. Review of a dental consult, dated 12/05/18, revealed the resident was assessed by the dentist and a recommendation was made for teeth extractions. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed no documentation the resident was provided follow up dental services for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$85,284 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $74,094 — penalty dated 2025-09-02
  • $11,190 — penalty dated 2025-04-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH 3 of 5Charleston Healthcare CenterCharleston, WV

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DMH MSTR LSCO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 02/07/2005
THE STEPHEN L. ROSEDALE 2012 SPOUSAL TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF22%since 02/07/2005
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
STOLTZ, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/07/2005
WILHEIM, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/07/2005
KING TREE MGMT., LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2005
BERNER, SUSANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2013
GROVES, DONNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
MATHEWS, PRESHESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/30/2024
C.R. STOLTZ FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2005
C.R. STOLTZ IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2005
HEALTH CARE HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2005
I. ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2005
I. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2005
R.S. WILHEIM IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2005
RONALD S WILHEIM 2012 SPOUSAL TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2005
ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2005
RRW, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2005
S.L. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2005
WILHEIM FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2005

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.6M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 0%Other / private 21%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$263per resident / day
operating cost
$8,000per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$296per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365877. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next