Wildwood Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 130.7 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to eliminate and/or reduce a resident's risk of being burned by a therapy modality by not ensuring the maintenance/inspection of a hydrocollater (a temperature controlled water bath for placing heating pads) was up to date, not maintaining a current temperature log for the hydrocollater, not testing the temperature of the hydrocollator prior to use on a resident, and not following the policy and/or procedure for use of a hydrocollator and heat pads resulting in a resident receiving a blistering burn on his hand for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds. (Resident H) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident H was reviewed on 5/22/24 at 1:29 p.m. Resident H's diagnoses included, but not limited to, type II diabetes, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and paranoid schizophrenia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set ( MDS) dated [DATE] indicated, Resident H was had a moderate cognitive impairment. A Facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were served in a sanitary and safe manner for 3 of 3 observations. Staff hair was not covered while in the kitchen, food preparation, and serving areas. (Dietary Manager, [NAME] 2, Dietary Aide 3) Findings include: 1. During the initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 1/5/26 from 9:10 a.m. to 9:35 a.m., the following was observed: - The DM was observed walking throughout the kitchen area. The DM was observed to have a beard restraint in place that covered above the nose area, below the chin area and approximately 2 inches from the ears. Facial hair, approximately one-fourth inch in length, was observed between the ears and the edge of the beard guard. The facial hair was observed to not be covered. - Dietary Aide 3 was observed walking throughout the kitchen area. Dietary Aide 3 was observed to have facial hair approximately one-fourth inch in length above the upper lip area. The facial hair was observed to not be covered. 2. During a follow-up kitchen observation on 1/5/26 from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure private information was kept confidential for 29 of 127 residents that reside in the facility for 3 of 5 days of the survey. (Resident 1, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 7, Resident 10, Resident 11, Resident 15, Resident 20, Resident 22, Resident 26, Resident 25, Resident 35, Resident 43, Resident 44, Resident 46, Resident 53, Resident 64, Resident 82, Resident 83, Resident 84, Resident 93, Resident 103, Resident 106, Resident 107, Resident 108, Resident 110, Resident 141, Resident 142, Resident 143)Findings include: On 1/5/26 at 9:35 a.m., white dry erase boards located across from the 400 and 500 hallways' nursing station were observed. The whiteboards, visible to all visitors and other residents, indicated the following resident information by each resident's room number. The specific resident room numbers were listed under the following categories, including but not limited to: -Daily Showers, Day [Showers]: (Resident's specific room number) Resident 93(Resident's specific room number) Resident 11(Resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was administered medications per their policy for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication compliance. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/15/2025 at 1:35 p.m. The medical diagnoses included stroke and heart failure. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 2/6/2025, indicated Resident B had moderate cognitive impairment. A heart failure care plan, revised 9/18/2024, indicated Resident B was at risk for complications related to heart failure, and an intervention of administering medications as ordered. During an interview on 4/15/2025 at 1:15 p.m., Resident B indicated a few weeks ago a nurse came into his room and gave him medications which were not his. She put the medications on his bedside table and left. When she was gone, he got out of bed and took the medications up to the night shift supervisor but could not recall her name. The night shift supervisor told him the medications were not his and disposed of them. During an interview on 4/15/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse by staff for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident D) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 4/16/25 at 10:00 a.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression, and attention deficit disorder. The 2/12/25 Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment indicated she was cognitively intact. She required partial/moderate assistance for upper body dressing, substantial/maximal assistance for lower body dressing, putting on and taking off footwear, and transferring from the chair to bed. The behavior care plan for Resident D, revised 3/30/25, indicated she had a behavior problem and refused to be checked and changed at times. Resident D and her spouse would panhandle off property at times, would hoard items, refused medications at times, made false statements/allegations, and sought male attention. Interventions included to approach and speak in a calm manner and to honor resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0559 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure notification and documentation was provided to Resident 23 regarding a room change for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for room change. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 23 was reviewed on 10/29/2024 at 1:20 p.m. The medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 8/27/2024, indicated Resident 23 was cognitively intact. A census report provided by the Director of Nursing, on 10/30/2024 at 9:45 a.m., indicated Resident 23 moved rooms on 7/1/2024. During an interview and observation on 10/23/2024 at 12:36 p.m., Resident 23 indicated a couple months ago, they were coming back from lunch and their items had been moved from their room to a room across the hall. When they asked the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), unable to recall CNA name, they were told they were moved across the hall for a little bit so their room could be renovated. Resident 23 stated, I was never told about coming over here [to the new room] before it happened and they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate care planning of Resident 56's bathing preferences, failed to assist a resident with shaving (Resident 120), and failed to provide nail care (Resident 39) for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include: 1.) The clinical record for Resident 56 was reviewed on 10/28/2024 at 1:20 p.m. The medical diagnoses included multiple sclerosis. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/21/2024, indicated Resident 56 was cognitively intact. A care plan, last revised on 2/5/2024, indicated Resident 56 was dependent on helper for bathing tasks and wished to have showers on Friday mornings. A care plan, last revised on 2/5/2024, indicated Resident 56 was dependent on helper for bathing tasks and wished to have showers on Wednesday and Saturdays. Review of the care tasks, last updated 9/13/2024, indicated Resident 56 was to receive showers on Fridays. During an interview and observation, on 10/24/2024 at 12:45 p.m., Resident 56 indicated they would like to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to hold a resident's insulin, as ordered, and ensure a resident had an off-loading cushion in her wheelchair, as care planned, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for insulin and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for skin integrity. (Residents 11 and 14) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 11 was reviewed on 10/25/24 at 11:41 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus. The diabetes care plan for Resident 11, revised 8/18/23, indicated to administer insulin injections per physician orders. The active physician's orders indicated to inject seven units of Humalog (fast acting insulin) solution subcutaneously in the morning with breakfast, in the afternoon with lunch, and in the evening with dinner. The orders indicated to Hold for results less than 100. The October 2024 medication administration record (MAR) indicated his blood sugar was 72 on 10/6/24 at dinner, 87 on 10/7/24 at breakfast, 70 on 10/8/24 at breakfast, 78 on 10/12/24 at breakfast, 96 on 10/16/24 at dinner, 91 on 10/21/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's palm guard was applied, as ordered, and initiate a range of motion (ROM) program for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for positioning and mobility and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for rehabilitation and restorative services. (Residents 99 and 109) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 109 was reviewed on 10/23/24 at 12:30 p.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, right side hemiparesis. The activities of daily living (ADLs) care plan, revised 8/19/24, indicated Resident 109 had a self-care performance deficit related to cerebral vascular accident, right side hemiparesis, depression, insomnia, substance abuse, and hypertension. The goal was for her to maintain her current level of function. An intervention was provision of substantial/maximal assistance with upper body dressing. The undated Therapy Referral Restorative nursing form indicated Resident 109 was to participate in the Range of Motion and Splint/Brace Care program to prevent further contracture and maintain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a care plan to address her individualized needs related to substance use disorder for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 93) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 93 was reviewed on 10/24/24 at 10:30 a.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression and substance use disorder (SUD). The 9/25/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated she was cognitively intact. An interview was conducted with Resident 93 on 10/24/24 at 10:46 a.m. She indicated she smoked weed in the facility in the back area. In December 2023, she smoked a joint outside in the smoking area and then sat in the gazebo. It was her own weed that she smoked, but she and a couple other residents usually put weed together to smoke, so she couldn't say for sure where the weed in the joint she smoked that day came from. Staff kept coming outside but left her in the gazebo throughout the night. Eventually they brought her inside with her rollator walker. Nursing took her blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 medical storage rooms were free of expired supplies. Findings include: During an observation of the storage room on the 700 hall on [DATE] at 11:50 a.m., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5, there were multiple expired items. Items included the following: three packages of twenty-two gauge by one inch BD Insyte Autoguard IV catheter- expired [DATE], five packages of BD Vacutainer push button blood collection set twenty-one gauge by three fourths inch by twelve inch- expired [DATE], nine packages of BD Vacutainer safety-lok blood collection set, twenty-three gauge by three fourths inch by one inch (six expired [DATE] and three expired [DATE]), two packages of Progressive Medical Administration set with flow controller- expired [DATE], and one package of disposable inner cannula for use with tracheotomy tube - expired [DATE]. During an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) 6 on [DATE] at 12:00 p.m., they indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $9.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 42% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN