Annandale Healthcare Center
6700 Columbia Pike, Annandale, VA 22003 · For profit - Corporation · 222 certified beds · (703) 256-7000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Aug 2018
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $90,896 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-09)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.4% | 14.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.5% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.5% | 18.7% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 3.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.3% | 15.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.5% | 20.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.2% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 4.7% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.0% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.4% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 66.2% | 73.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.2% | 22.3% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.5% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.84 | 1.52 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.15 | 1.48 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
41.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 121 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 41.0%CMS range 32.6–52.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 8.5–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 37.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 57.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 5.2–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.88 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 222 beds and averages 209.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
61 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assess all residents so they could safely and independently leave the facility property specifically for the identified five of 63 residents in the survey sample, Residents #421, #164, #155, #52 and #125. Resident #421 left the facility and was involved in a hit-and-run accident with life-threatening injuries on [NAME] Pike, the four-lane divided highway in front of the facility, which placed this resident in the presence of immediate jeopardy at the time of the accident. The extent of this issue could result in serious injury, harm, impairment, or death, which constituted the determination of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ), as cited at level K. After Immediate Jeopardy was removed, the scope and severity were lowered to a level 3 isolated (G). The findings include: 1. For Resident #421 (R421), the facility staff failed to assess the resident to safely leave the facility property…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2021-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, complaint investigation and staff interviews the facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #259) was provided with supervision and a safe environment to prevent a fall with serious injury in the survey sample of 51 residents. The findings included: Resident #259 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance and impaired decision making, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit, repeated falls, alcohol abuse, and occasional hallucinations. Resident #259 fell down a flight of steps after going through an unsecured gate. Resident #259 received serious injury's as a result of the fall. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] with an ARD date of 2/19/20 assessed this resident as having moderately impaired vision. In the area of Cognitive Patterns this resident was coded a (03) out of (15) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. In the area of Activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the physician of medications that were not administered for 2 of 63 residents in the survey sample, Residents #421 and #4. The findings include: 1. For Resident #421 (R421), the facility staff failed to notify the physician of medications not administered on multiple dates from May 2024 through September 2024. Review of R421's eMAR (electronic medication administration record) dated 5/1/24-5/31/24 documented the resident not receiving the following scheduled medications: - Gabapentin (1) 400mg (milligram) 2 capsules every 8 hours for neuropathy pain. On 5/14/24 at 10:00 p.m., 5/18/24 at 10:00 p.m., 5/21/24 at 2:00 p.m., 5/26/24 at 2:00 p.m., and 5/29/24 at 2:00 p.m. - Indomethacin (2) 50mg three times a day for pain. Afternoon doses on 5/19/24, 5/21/24, 5/26/24, and 5/29/24. - Methocarbamol (3) 500mg 2 tablets four times a day for muscle spasm. At 12:00 p.m. on 5/21/24, 5/26/24, and 5/29/24. Review of R421's eMAR dated 6/1/24-6/30/24 documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide a clean, comfortable and homelike environment for three of 63 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 73 and #170 and on two of six units (East and [NAME] 1) and in , three of six shower rooms (South, [NAME] 1 and [NAME] 2). The findings include: 1. For Resident #73(R73), the facility staff failed to maintain a homelike environment, the staff were heard yelling from room to room, around the circular unit, for each other. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with a assessment reference date of 9/23/24, the resident scored a 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. An interview was conducted with R73 on 9/30/24 at approximately 6:50 p.m. The resident stated the staff yell back and forth to each other all through the day and sometimes through the night. She stated it was very disturbing when you are trying to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain evidence of grievances for one of three years, the year 2022. The findings include: The facility staff failed to provide evidence of grievances for the year 2022. On 10/7/24 at 12:58 p.m., grievance/concern forms for the year of 2022 were requested. On 10/8/24 at 9:48 a.m., an interview was conducted with ASM (administrative staff member) #5 (the regional director of operations). ASM #5 stated the social worker who was employed during 2022 was no longer employed at the facility and the staff were not able to find all grievance/concern forms from that year. ASM #5 stated the staff were only able to find pieces of grievance/concern forms and she knew more were completed then the staff could find. On 10/8/24 at 10:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #2 (the current director of social services). OSM #2 stated grievances and the resolutions should be documented on a concern form and kept in a folder in the social services office. On 10/8/24 at 6:25 p.m., ASM #1 (the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive care plan for eight of 63 residents in the survey sample, Residents #228, #170, #74, #421, #219, #4, #62, and #82. The findings include: 1. For Resident #228 (R228), the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for activities. A review of R228's clinical record revealed an activity preference interview dated 9/23/23 that documented the resident reported a current interest in spending time outdoors and walking. R228's comprehensive care plan dated 9/20/23 failed to document information regarding activities. On 10/8/24 at 9:03 a.m., an interview was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #8 (the activities director). OSM #8 stated every resident should have an activities care plan because the activities staff must have a plan of care to know exactly what they are going to do with the residents. OSM #8 stated the activities care plan should be developed on admission and reviewed/revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for five of 63 residents in the survey sample, Residents #48, #110, #123, #162, #190. The findings include: 1. For Resident #48 (R48), the facility staff failed to review and revise the resident's comprehensive care plan for bed rails. R48's comprehensive care plan, revised on 8/22/24, failed to document information regarding bed rails. On 10/1/24 at 12:05 p.m., R48 was observed lying in bed with bilateral grab bars (bed rails) in the upright position. On 10/3/24 at 5:23 p.m., an interview was conducted with RN (registered nurse) #1, regarding the purpose of the care plan. RN #1 stated, If there is no care plan, there is no care. RN #1 stated everything revolves around the care plan and if staff are not able to plan for the patient, then there is no way for staff to care for them. RN #1 stated residents' care plans should include documentation regarding grab bars because this communicates the use of grab bars to staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide activities based on resident preferences for two of 63 residents in the survey sample, Residents #219 and #228. The findings include: 1. For Resident #219 (R219), the facility staff failed to provide activities based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan preferences. On the admission MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/8/22, the resident scored 2 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was severely impaired for making daily decisions. The assessment documented preferences for music being very important and participating in activities, doing things with groups of people, being around animals, having books and magazines, going outside and participating in religious services being somewhat important to the resident as reported by the family or significant other. The activity preferences…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-09 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement bed rail requirements for four of 63 residents in the survey sample, Residents #48, #166, #187, and #221. The findings include: 1. For Resident #48 (R48), the facility staff failed to attempt alternatives prior to bed rail use, assess the resident for risk of entrapment, review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative, and obtain informed consent. A review of R48's clinical record revealed an admission evaluation dated 5/24/22 that failed to document information regarding bed rails. A bed safety evaluation dated 8/26/24 documented, 7. Has the resident expressed the desire to have an assist device on their bed? No. A review of physician's orders for October 2024 failed to reveal an order for bed rails. On 10/1/24 at 12:05 p.m., R48 was observed lying in bed with bilateral grab bars (bed rails) in the upright position. On 10/3/24 at 5:23 p.m., an interview was conducted with RN (registered nurse) #1. RN #1 stated he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-09 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to make required physician visits for four of 63 residents in the survey sample, Residents #52, #164, #48, and #155. The findings include: 1. For Resident #52, the facility staff failed to ensure the physician made the required visits. Review of the clinical record failed to evidence the physician did any required visits since 3/21/24. On 10/7/24 at 2:59 p.m., an interview was conducted with ASM (administrative staff member) #7, the physician. ASM #7 stated he tries to see residents every 60 days. On 10/9/24 at 9:00 a.m., and interview was conducted with ASM #2, the director of nursing. ASM #2 stated the medical records employee is responsible for tracking physician visits and notifying the physicians of a need for visits. The facility policy, Physician Visit Logs documented in part, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to maintain a system to monitor physician's visits for all in-house…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-09 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — patternProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to perform laboratory tests as ordered by the physician/provider for two of 63 residents in the survey sample, Residents #130 and #74. The findings include: 1. For Resident #130, the facility staff failed to perform Hemoglobin A1C (test to measure long term blood sugar levels), lipid, and CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel) laboratory tests for multiple months in 2023. A review of R130's orders revealed, in part: 4/3/23 Hemoglobin A1C every three months. 8/11/23 HgbA1c, CMP One time. A review R130's of laboratory results for 2023 revealed no Hemoglobin A1C results between 4/1/23 and 12/2/23. This review revealed no CMP between 8/11/23 and 12/2/23. On 10/8/24 at 1:08 p.m., LPN (licensed practical nurse) #8 was interviewed. She stated the night nurses are responsible for acknowledging when the EMR (electronic medical record) generates a reminder for a resident lab test. The night nurses print out the laboratory orders and put these in a book. When the outside laboratory company…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-09 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — patternRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to conduct required bed inspections for four of 63 residents in the survey sample, Residents #48, #166, #187, and #221. The findings include: 1. For Resident #48 (R48), the facility staff failed to conduct an inspection of the resident's bed rails to identify areas of possible entrapment. A review of R48's clinical record revealed an admission evaluation dated 5/24/22 that failed to document information regarding bed rails. A bed safety evaluation dated 8/26/24 documented, 7. Has the resident expressed the desire to have an assist device on their bed? No. Further review of R48's clinical record failed to reveal an inspection of the resident's bed rails to identify areas of possible entrapment. On 10/1/24 at 12:05 p.m., R48 was observed lying in bed with bilateral grab bars (bed rails) in the upright position On 10/3/24 at 5:23 p.m., an interview was conducted with RN (registered nurse) #1. RN #1 stated an assessment for risk of entrapment should be done during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 49 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to promote dignity for two of 63 residents in the survey sample, Residents #142 and #162. The findings include: 1. For Resident #142 (R142), the facility staff failed to serve lunch in a dignified manner. R142's roommate was served lunch on 10/2/24 at 1:20 p.m. and R142 was not served lunch until ten minutes later. On 10/2/24 at 1:20 p.m., R142 and the resident's roommate was observed in their bedroom. At this time, R142's roommate was served lunch. R142 was not served and fed by a CNA (certified nursing assistant) until 1:30 p.m. (ten minutes later). On 10/3/24 at 3:21 p.m., an interview was conducted with CNA #2. CNA #2 stated she does not serve and feed residents who require assistance until residents who eat independently are served. CNA #2 stated that if one resident in a room is eating and his roommate requires assistance, she will ask other CNAs to finish passing meal trays so she can feed the resident who requires assistance. CNA #2 stated a resident who requires assistance should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and facility document review it was determined the facility staff failed to assess a resident for self-administration of over-the-counter eye drops that were on the over the bed table, for one of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #65. The findings include: For Resident #65 (R65), over the counter Opcon A eye drops were found on her over the bed table, there was no evidence of an assessment for self-administration of medications. Observation was made on 9/30/24 at approximately 6:35 p.m. of Opcon A eye drops, an over-the-counter medication, was observed on the over the bed table. The bottle of eye drops was noted again on the bedside table on 10/1/24 at 3:50 p.m. An interview was conducted with R65 on 9/30/24 at 6:35 p.m. R65 stated she uses these drops to help her eyes. Review of the physician orders failed to evidence a physician order for the above stated drops. Further review of the clinical record failed to evidence an assessment for the self-administration of medications. An interview was conducted with LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to report an injury of unknown origin within the required time frame for one of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #68. The findings include: For Resident #68 (R68), the facility staff failed to report a left-hand fracture of unknown origin to the state agency within two hours. A review of R68's clinical record revealed a nurse's note dated 3/14/24 that documented the resident presented with left hand swelling. Tylenol was administered with an effective effect and an x-ray was ordered. An x-ray result dated 3/16/24 documented, Undisplaced fracture mid portion left fourth metacarpal (a bone in the hand). Further review of R68's clinical record failed to reveal a known cause of the fracture. A facility synopsis of events submitted to the state agency documented, Report date: 3/18/24. Incident date: 3/14. Incident type: Injury of unknown origin. The facility received X ray results stating undisplaced fourth metacarpal of the left hand. The resident is not fearful and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide written notification to the resident and/or responsible party and failed to notify the ombudsman upon transfer for two of 63 residents in the survey sample, Residents #1 and #4. The findings include: 1. For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to evidence a written notice was provided to the resident and/or responsible party and failed to notify the ombudsman upon transfer to the hospital on 7/4/25. The nurse's note dated, 7/4/24 at 3:31 p.m. documented, Critical Lab (laboratory) value: Creatinine 10.78, BUN (blood urea nitrogen) 121. Contributing DX (diagnosis) CKD (chronic kidney disease) Stage 4. Currently on Bumetanide (used to treat edema/fluid retention) (1) 6 mg daily. VS (vital signs) 128/70 (blood pressure), 97.8 (temperature), 72 (pulse), 17 (respirations)[NAME], sat (oxygen saturation) 98% RA (room air). NP (nurse practitioner) review results with resident via…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide a bed hold notice at the time of transfer for two of 63 residents in the survey sample, Residents #1 and #4. The findings include: 1. For Resident #1, the facility staff failed to evidence a bed hold notice was provided to the resident and/or responsible party at the time of transfer to the hospital on 7/4/24. The nurse's note dated, 7/4/24 at 3:31 p.m. documented, Critical Lab (laboratory) value: Creatinine 10.78, BUN (blood urea nitrogen) 121. Contributing DX (diagnosis) CKD (chronic kidney disease) Stage 4. Currently on Bumetanide (used to treat edema/fluid retention) (1) 6 mg daily. VS (vital signs) 128/70 (blood pressure), 97.8 (temperature), 72 (pulse), 17 (respirations)[NAME], sat (oxygen saturation) 98% RA (room air). NP (nurse practitioner) review results with resident via video conference with nurse at bedside. Order obtained to transfer resident to ER (emergency room)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete MDS (minimum data set) assessment for one of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #125. The findings include: For Resident #125 (R125), the facility staff failed to assess the resident's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) for the 8/27/24 quarterly MDS assessment. Section C Cognitive Patterns of R125's quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 8/27/24 documented, C0100. Should Brief Interview for Mental Status (C0200-C0500) be Conducted? Attempt to conduct interview with all residents. A dash was coded, indicated the resident's BIMS was not assessed. On 10/8/24 at 10:23 a.m., an interview was conducted with RN (registered nurse) #2 (the mobile MDS coordinator). RN #2 stated the BIMS on R125's 8/27/24 MDS assessment was accidentally missed. RN #2 stated staff was in the process of completing a corrected MDS. On 10/8/24 at 6:25 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1 (the executive director) and ASM #2 (the director of nursing) were made aware of the above concern. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide the resident/RR (resident representative) with a written summary of the baseline care plan for two of 63 residents in the survey sample, Residents #468 and #469. The findings include: 1. For Resident #468 (R468) the facility staff failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan after admission on [DATE]. A review of R468's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of her clinical record, including assessments and progress notes, failed to reveal evidence that the resident and/or her RR had been given a written summary of her baseline care plan. On 10/8/24 at 9:28 a.m., LPN (licensed practical nurse) #3, a unit manager, was interviewed. She stated the nursing and social services are responsible for developing the baseline care plan. She stated the social worker is responsible for giving the resident a written copy of the summary of the baseline care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for one of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #164. The findings include: For Resident #164 (R164), the facility staff failed to clarify physician orders for administration of Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen. The physician orders documented in part, - Acetaminophen Oral Tablet 325 MG (milligram) (Acetaminophen) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for PAIN GIVE WITH IBUPROFEN. Order Date: 05/29/2024. - Ibuprofen Oral Tablet 200 MG (Ibuprofen) Give 2 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for PAIN scale 1-3, GIVE WITH APAP. Order Date: 11/21/2023. The eMAR (electronic medication administration record) for R164 dated 8/1/24-8/31/24 documented the resident receiving the Acetaminophen 325mg 1 tablet on 8/24/24 at 1:38 p.m. The eMAR failed to evidence the resident receiving Ibuprofen. The eMAR for R164 dated 9/1/24-9/30/24 documented the resident receiving the Acetaminophen 325mg 1 tablet on 9/28/24 at 4:41…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop a complete post-discharge plan of care for one of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #227. The findings include: For Resident #227 (R227) (who discharged on 3/30/24), the facility staff failed to develop a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of the resident's stay, a final summary of the resident's status, and reconciliation of medications. The facility staff also failed to ensure R227 was able to obtain medications after discharge. A review of R227's clinical record revealed a nurse's note dated 3/30/24 that documented the resident discharged home, was provided discharge instructions, verbalized understanding, and signed. The note failed to document any further information regarding the discharge. A Discharge summary dated [DATE] documented the resident's vital signs and a social services section that included the discharge date , discharge location, and discharge goals. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care to a dependent resident for one of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #219. The findings include: For Resident #219 (R219), the facility staff failed to provide incontinence care during dates in September and November of 2022. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/15/22, the resident was assessed as being severely impaired for making daily decisions, requiring extensive assistance of one person for toileting and being frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the ADL documentation for R219 dated 9/1/22-9/30/22 failed to evidence incontinence care, toileting assistance or personal hygiene assistance provided on night shift (11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) of 9/12/22 and 9/14/22. Review of the ADL documentation for R219 dated 11/1/22-11/30/22 failed to evidence incontinence care, toileting assistance or personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to administer medications as order by the physician for two of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #82 and #221. The findings include: 1. For Resident #82 (R82), the facility staff failed to administer an antibiotic per the physician order. The physician order dated 9/20/24 documented, Ciprofloxacin HCL (hydrochloride) Oral Tablet 500 MG (milligrams); Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for UTI (urinary tract infection) for 7 days. The September 2024 MAR (medication administration record) documented the above order. On 9/20/24 the 6:00 p.m. dose documented a 5. A 5 indicates See Nurses Note. The nurse's note dated 9/20/24, documented, Not available. Review of the (Emergency backup medication system) contents revealed Ciprofloxacin 250 mg tablets were available in the backup system. The comprehensive care plan dated, 9/22/24, documented in part, Focus: Resident has an infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement interventions to treat a contracture for one of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #62. The findings include: For Resident #62 (R62), the facility staff failed to implement a splint to prevent a right hand contracture from worsening. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) 6/25/24, R62 was coded as having no cognitive impairment according to the BIMS (brief interview for mental status). He was coded as having upper extremity range of motion impairment on one side. On 10/26/24 at 12:36 p.m. and 10/2/24 at 11:05 a.m., R62 was observed sitting up in bed. His right hand was contracted, and there was no splint visible. When asked if he ever was provided a splint for his right hand, he stated he had one in the past, but did not know what happened to it. He added that the staff did not know where the splint was located either. A review of R62's occupational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide care and services for an external catheter for one of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #82. The findings include: For Resident #82(R82), the facility staff failed to obtain a physician order for the use of an external catheter. Observation was made of R82 was made on 9/30/24 at approximately 6:50 p.m. The resident was in bed with a urinary collection bag hanging off the bed frame. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, with an assessment reference date of 8/8/24, in Section H - Bladder and Bowel, did not coded R82 as having an internal catheter or an external catheter. Review of the physician orders failed to evidence a physician order for an indwelling or external urinary catheter. On 10/2/24 12:43p.m. a second observation was made of R82. The personal aide showed this surveyor an external catheter that she was given to use for the resident and that was what was in place. On 10/3/24 at 11:26 a.m. an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, employee record review, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to meet the CNA (certified nursing assistant) requirements for two of five employee records reviewed, CNA #7 and #8. The findings include: For CNA #7 and #8, the facility staff failed to evidence the two CNAs had completed their annual mandatory 12 hours of in-service training. CNA #7 was hired on 8/27/07. The training record documented he had 3.6 hours of in-service training in the past 12 months. CNA #8 was hired on 87/30/12. The training record documented he had 8.1 hours of in-service training the past 12 months. An interview was conducted with ASM (administrative staff member) #2, the director of nursing, on 10/9/24 at 8:49 a.m. ASM #2 stated she tracks the staffing education. She stated she looks at the report from (name of electronic training program) and sees who is due for training. The percentage numbers of those completed are brought to the morning meeting. The program will tell her what is due, past due and what is completed. The staff members get…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide medically related social services for 1 of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #132. The findings include: For Resident #132 (R132), the facility staff failed to identify the need for medically related social services and make attempts to ensure services were pursued. R132 lacked an effective support from family or community and no legal representative, was cognitively impaired with documented behavioral disturbances however the facility staff never contacted any outside services for evaluation. R132 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to dementia, unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance (1), major depressive disorder (2) and psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition (3). The admission record for R132 documented the resident being their own responsible party and own emergency contact. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility pharmacy failed to provide medications for one of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #4. The findings include: For Resident #4 (R4), the pharmacy failed to provide Zosyn (1) for administration on 9/7/24. A review of R4's clinical record revealed the following order dated 9/6/24: Piperacillin Sod-Tazobactam So Solution (1) (Zosyn) Reconstituted 4-0.5 GM (grams) Use 4.5 gram intravenously every 6 hours for osteomyelitis (infection of the bone). A review of R4's progress notes revealed the following nurses' note dated 9/7/24: eMar - Medication Administration Note: Piperacillin Sod-Tazobactam So Solution Reconstituted 4-0.5 GM Use 4.5 gram intravenously every 6 hours for Osteomyelitis until 10/08/2024 .Resident meds (medications) are pending for pharmacy delivery. On 10/8/24 at 9:28 a.m., LPN (licensed practical nurse) #3 was interviewed. After reviewing R4's progress notes and September 2024 MAR (medication administration record), she stated the Zosyn was ordered for R4 as a discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to act on the pharmacist's recommendation for one of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #130. The findings include: For Resident #130 (R130), the facility staff failed to act on the pharmacist's recommendations to perform laboratory tests and failed to address a recommendation regarding an as-needed psychoactive medication for multiple months in 2023 and 2024, . A review of R130's monthly pharmacy medication regimen reviews revealed, in part: 10/18/23 The following labs for Lipid panel and CMP (complete metabolic panel) (was due in August) are ordered .however the results for the lipids are currently not available. A review of R130's laboratory results revealed no lipid panel or CMP between 10/18/23 and 12/2/23. 12/29/23 Resident has a current order for Trazodone (1) which is a prn (as-needed) psychotropic medication without a stop date .State operations manual requires an assessment to continue a prn psychotropic medication beyond 14 days .Please reassess the prn…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement interventions to prevent unnecessary medication administration for one of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #130. The findings include: A review of R130's physician orders revealed the following order dated 12/15/23: Trazodone Oral Tablet 100 mg (milligrams) Give 200 mg by mouth every 24 hours as needed for insomnia nightly. Further review of R130's orders revealed the order for the as-needed medication was not addressed by the provider until 2/21/24. On 10/8/24 at 1:57 p.m., ASMs (administrative staff members) #8 and #9, both of whom are nurse practitioners, were interviewed. ASM #9 stated she was aware that any psychotropic prn (as-needed) order could only last for 14 days. She stated: It is regulatory. She stated she tries to always put a 14 day stop order if a resident needs a temporary as-needed psychoactive medication. On 10/8/24 at 2:27 p.m., LPN (licensed practical nurse) #3, a unit manager, was interviewed. She stated any psychoactive order that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility pharmacy failed to for one of prevent a significant medication error for one of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #4. The findings include: For Resident #4 (R4), the facility staff failed to administer Zosyn (1) at noon on 9/7/24, resulting in a significant medication error. A review of R4's clinical record revealed the following order dated 9/6/24: Piperacillin Sod-Tazobactam So Solution (1) (Zosyn) Reconstituted 4-0.5 GM (grams) Use 4.5 gram intravenously every 6 hours for osteomyelitis (infection of the bone). A review of R4's progress notes revealed the following nurses' note dated 9/7/24: eMar - Medication Administration Note: Piperacillin Sod-Tazobactam So Solution Reconstituted 4-0.5 GM Use 4.5 gram intravenously every 6 hours for Osteomyelitis until 10/08/2024 .Resident meds (medications) are pending for pharmacy delivery. On 10/8/24 at 9:28 a.m., LPN (licensed practical nurse) #3 was interviewed. After reviewing R4's progress notes and September 2024 MAR (medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide food in a form to meet a resident's needs for one of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #170. The findings include: For Resident #170 (R170), the facility staff failed to cut the resident's food into bite-sized pieces, per a physician's order. A review of R170's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 4/10/24 for a regular diet and to cut food into bite-sized pieces. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/25/24, the resident scored 12 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. On 10/1/24 at 9:21 a.m., R170 was served a meal tray that contained toast with sausage gravy. The meal ticket on the tray documented, CUT FOOD INTO BITE SIZE PIECES. The toast with sausage gravy was not cut into bite-sized pieces. On 10/1/24 at 1:23 p.m., R170 was served a meal tray that contained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #224. The findings include: For Resident #224 (R224), the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate medical record including consultation report documentation from the facility consulted dermatologist. The physician orders for R224 documented in part, - Dermatology consults if the blister open/un-opened does not get better, one time only for consult for 1 day. Order Date: 03/28/2023. - Resident is schedule for a Dermatology appointment on Thursday 4/20/2023 at 11:45 am. [Address and phone number]. Order Date: 04/17/2023. - Dermatologist appointment on 05/11/2023 at 11:45 a.m. [Address and phone number]. Order Date: 04/20/2023. The progress notes for R224 documented the resident going to the dermatology appointment with their POA (power of attorney) on 4/20/23 and 5/11/23. The progress notes further documented, 4/27/2023 13:55 (1:55 p.m.) Note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement infection prevention interventions for one of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #4. The findings include: For Resident #4 (R4), the facility staff failed to wear appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) when they provided wound care to R4 on 10/4/24. On 10/4/24 at 10:55 a.m., RN (registered nurse) #5, the wound nurse, was observed changing R4's pressure injury dressings. At no time during the process of changing R4's dressings did RN #5 wear a protective gown. She only wore gloves. A review of R4's orders revealed the following order written 9/6/24: Enhanced barrier precautions .related to IV (intravenous) therapy .wounds. On 10/8/24 at 9:28 a.m., LPN (licensed practical nurse) #3, a unit manager, was interviewed. She stated if a resident has orders for enhanced barrier precautions, any nurse providing wound care should be wearing both gloves and gown. She stated this is not only to protect the nurse and the resident who is receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0944 — isolatedConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, employee record review and facility document review, it was determined that one of five employee record reviews, failed to meet the training requirements for QAPI (quality assurance performance improvement), OSM (other staff member) #13. The findings include: For OSM #13, the facility staff failed to provide evidence of documentation of the facility's QAPI training. The review of OSM #13's completed trainings failed to evidence documentation of training in the QAPI process. An interview was conducted with OSM #11, the director of rehabilitation, on 10/8/24 at 2:50 p.m. OSM #11 stated, QAPI training is not required for the therapy department, but they do attend QAPI. The facility policy, Staff Education and Competency Testing documented in part, Procedure: I. Assessment of Needs: a. Areas to be evaluated are determined by facility needs including but not limited to areas that are .6) Annual regulatory requirements. ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the executive director, ASM #2, the director of nursing, and ASM #5, the regional director of operations,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolatedProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, employee record review and facility document review, it was determined that one of five employee record reviews, failed to meet the training requirements for behavioral health training, OSM (other staff member) #13. The findings include: For OSM #13, the facility staff failed to provide evidence of documentation of the facility's behavioral health training. The review of OSM #13's completed trainings failed to evidence documentation of training in behavioral health. An interview was conducted with OSM #11, the director of rehabilitation, on 10/8/24 at 2:50 p.m. OSM #11 stated, that behavioral health training is not required for the therapy department, many times if anything we need to know, we will get an in-service by the staff in the building. The facility policy, Staff Education and Competency Testing documented in part, Procedure: I. Assessment of Needs: a. Areas to be evaluated are determined by facility needs including but not limited to areas that are .6) Annual regulatory requirements. ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the executive director,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-03-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain three of three facility dumpsters in a sanitary manner. The findings included: On 3/2/21 at 3:00 p.m., observation of the facility dumpster was conducted with OSM (Other Staff Member) #1, the Dietary Manager. More than 15 plastic gloves were observed on the ground around the facility dumpsters. These gloves did not appear to be visibly soiled. Plastic bottles and other debris were also observed around the facility dumpsters. All three dumpsters were shut, however bags of trash were observed on top of each dumpster. On 3/2/21 at 3:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with OSM #1, the Dietary Manager. OSM #1 stated that dietary as well as housekeeping and maintenance were all responsible for ensuring the dumpster area was clean. When asked how often the garbage truck made visits, OSM #1 stated, Once daily. When asked if trash bags should be thrown on top of the dumpsters, OSM #1 stated that it should not. OSM #1 confirmed that the dumpster area was not clean. On 3/2/21 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-03-05 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and review of facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure emergency medical equipment was in place and operational, and that staff were able to demonstrate they were able to provide the required emergency care to residents on 6 of the facility's 6 units. The findings include: According to the review of the facility's assessment dated 12/2019 through 11/2020, it indicated the following: The purpose of the assessment is to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day to day operations and emergencies. The assessment also indicated that another purpose of the assessment was to to ensure the capabilities to provide care and services to the residents in the facility, using a competency based approach that focused on the provision of care to each resident in order to attain and maintain their highest physical well-being. The competencies required and demonstrated proficiency included specialized care-oxygen administration,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-05 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interviews, and clinical record review the facility's staff failed to afford 1 of 14 residents (Resident #203) the opportunity to participate in their care plan meeting. The findings included: Resident #203 was originally admitted to the facility 8/18/17 and has never been discharged . Resident #203's diagnoses included; Parkinson's disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/11/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #203's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section E (Behavior) the resident was coded for no behaviors. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring total care of two people with toileting, total care of one with bathing, extensive assistance of two with bed mobility and transfers, extensive assistance of one person with locomotion, personal hygiene and dressing and supervision of one person after set-up with eating. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interviews, and clinical record review the facility's staff failed to make reasonable accommodation according to resident's needs and preferences for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #203), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #203 was originally admitted to the facility 8/18/17, and had never been discharged . Resident #203's diagnoses included; Parkinson's disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/11/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #203's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section E (Behavior) the resident was coded for no behaviors. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring total care of two people with toileting, total care of one with bathing, extensive assistance of two with bed mobility and transfers, extensive assistance of one person with locomotion, personal hygiene and dressing and supervision of one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility documentation, the facility failed to execute the opportunity to provide an advance directive for two Residents. Resident #69 and Resident #149 out 51 Residents in a survey sample. 1. The facility staff failed to execute the opportunity to provide an advance directive for Resident #69. The findings include: Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. With a past medical history that included anxiety, depression and Alzheimer's disease. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS) a quarterly revision with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] coded the resident as having a (BIMS) of 1 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. A review of the clinical record on [DATE] revealed there was no advance directive in the clinical record. 2. The facility staff failed to execute the opportunity to provide an advance directive for Resident #149. The Findings include: Resident #149 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-05 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to send a copy of the Resident's Care Plan to include their goals for 2 of 51 residents (Resident 159 and 509) after being transferred and admitted to the hospital. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #159's Plan of Care Summary to include his care plan goals was sent upon transfer/discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #159 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #159 included but not limited to Congestive Heart Failure. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS), a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/01/20 coded the resident with a 06 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 04/14/20, according to the facility's documentation, Resident #159, departed facility via 911 (local hospital) for hypoxia. Resident had labored…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-05 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in writing discharge for 1 of 51 residents (Resident #160) in the survey sample. The findings included: The facility staff failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of Resident #160's transfer home on [DATE]. Resident #160 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #160 included but not limited to Anemia. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS), a 14-day assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/09/20 coded the resident with a 14 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The Discharge MDS assessments was dated for 12/18/20 - discharged assessment - return not anticipated. On 12/18/20, according to the facility's documentation, Resident was discharge home this morning, head to toe skin assessment done no skin issue noted,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-05 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, facility documentation review and clinical record review the facility staff failed send a copy of the Bed-Hold Policy upon discharge/transfer for 2 of 51 resident's (Resident #159 and 509) after being transferred to the local hospital. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #159 was provided a written copy of the facility's bed-hold and reserve bed payment policy upon transfer/discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #159 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #159 included but not limited to Congestive Heart Failure. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS), a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/01/20 coded the resident with a 06 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 04/14/20, according to the facility's documentation, Resident #159, departed facility via 911 to (hospital) for hypoxia. Resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-05 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interviews, and clinical record review the facility's staff failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment to include behavioral symptoms not directed toward others (resident placing herself on the floor) for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #203), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #203 was originally admitted to the facility 8/18/17, and had never been discharged . Resident #203's diagnoses included; Parkinson's disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/11/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #203's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section E (Behavior) the resident was coded for no behaviors. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring total care of two people with toileting, total care of one with bathing, extensive assistance of two with bed mobility and transfers, extensive assistance of one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to revise the care plan with a change in coded status from Full Code to DNR on [DATE] for one of 51 residents in the survey sample; Resident #93. The findings included: Resident #93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary, muscle weakness, age related cognitive decline, and major depressive disorder. Resident #93's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of [DATE]. Resident #93 was coded as being intact in cognitive function scoring 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) exam. Review of Resident #93's face sheet documented the following: DNR (Do Not Resuscitate), CPR (Cardiopulmonary resuscitation). Review of Resident #93's current POS (Physician Order Summary) revealed the following active orders: Full Code. This order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-05 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interviews, and clinical record review the facility's staff failed to develop, monitor and implement a behavioral plan to support a resident to attain the highest practicable well-being for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #203), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #203 was originally admitted to the facility 8/18/17, and had never been discharged . Resident #203's diagnoses included; Parkinson's disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/11/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #203's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section E (Behavior) the resident was coded for no behaviors. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring total care of two people with toileting, total care of one with bathing, extensive assistance of two with bed mobility and transfers, extensive assistance of one person with locomotion, personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the observation of 4 medication carts and 3 medication rooms; the facility staff failed to dispose of expired medications for two units. The East Unit and the Emerald/Quarantine Unit. The facility staff failed to dispose of an expired medications on the East and the Emerald/Quarantine units. The findings include: On 3/02/21 at 12:38 P.M. a medication cart inspection was conducted on the East Unit with RN #2. Upon visual inspection, One House Stock bottle of sodium bicarbonate 1000 tablets (BOTTLE 1/4 FULL) with an expiration date of 10/20 was seen. RN #2 stated that the expired bottle should have been discarded. On 3/02/21 at 3:45 P.M. a medication cart inspection was conducted on The Emerald/Quarantine Unit with RN (Registered Nurse) #3. One bottle of ONCE DAILY MULTI Vitamins with an Expiration date of 2/2 was seen. RN #3 stated that the bottle of vitamins should have been discarded. The Policy reads: It is the policy of this facility to provide resident centered care that meets the psychosocial, physical and emotional needs and concerns of the residents. The purpose of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to discontinue a code status order for Full Code, when code status had changed to a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) on [DATE] for one of 51 residents in the survey sample; Resident # 93. The findings included: Resident #93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary, muscle weakness, age related cognitive decline, and major depressive disorder. Resident #93's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of [DATE]. Resident #93 was coded as being intact in cognitive function scoring 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) exam. Review of Resident #93's face sheet documented the following: DNR (Do Not Resuscitate), CPR (Cardiopulmonary resuscitation). Review of Resident #93's current POS (Physician Order Summary) revealed the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 resident (Resident #47) wore his face mask correctly to prevent the spread of possible COVID-19 infection and failed to ensure the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) was reviewed at least annually. The findings included: 1. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to status post stroke with hemiplegia, high blood pressure, diabetes, and CAD (Coronary Artery Disease). Resident #47's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set Assessment) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 12/13/20. Resident #47 was coded as being intact in cognitive function scoring 14 out of possible 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) exam. On 3/4/21 at 10:11 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #47. Resident #47 was sitting up in the lobby wearing his face mask on his chin. His face mask was not covering his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-08-23 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility document review the facility staff failed to notify the office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in writing of applicable discharges for 3 of 42 residents in the survey sample (Resident #45, #142 and #91). 1. The facility staff failed to notify the office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of Resident #45's discharge to the hospital on 4/6/18. 2. The facility staff failed to notify the office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of Resident #142's discharge to the hospital on 6/20/18. 3. The facility staff failed to notify the office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of Resident #91's discharged to the hospital on 6/13/18. The finding include: 1. Resident #45 was admitted to the nursing facility on 5/16/17 with a diagnoses that included osteomyelitis of left foot and ankle and diabetes mellitus. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was an Annual dated 5/18/18 and coded the resident on the Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-08-23 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility document review the facility staff failed to issue bed-hold notices and policy for 7 of 42 residents in the survey sample (Resident #45, #142, #91, 68, #99, #175 and #162). 1. The facility staff failed to issue a bed-hold notice and policy to Resident #45 prior to discharge to the hospital on 4/6/18. 2. The facility staff failed to issue a bed-hold notice and policy to Resident #142 prior to discharge to the hospital on 6/20/18. 3. The facility staff failed to issue a bed-hold notice and policy to Resident #91 prior to discharge to the hospital on 6/13/18. 4. The facility staff failed to issue a bed-hold notice for Resident #68 prior to a Leave of Absence (LOA), 8/20/18 through 8/23/18. 5. The facility staff failed to issue a bed-hold notice for Resident #99 prior to LOA on 8/16/18. 6. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #175 was issued the facility's bed hold policy and reserve bed payment policy upon transfer/discharge to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2018-08-23 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review group interview and staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain an effective Pest Control Program. The findings included: During the Group Interview on 8/22/18 residents complained of mice being in their rooms. The residents stated mice droppings were observed in rooms 106, 204 and 305. A review of the Pest Control Log for the North Unit indicated: On 8/15/18 a mice (sic) was sighted in room [ROOM NUMBER]. A review of the Pest Control Log for the South Unit indicated: On 2/21/18 mice were sighted in the dining room. A review of the Pest Control Log for the [NAME] 1 Unit indicated: On 8/21/18 mice were sighted in room [ROOM NUMBER]. A review of the Pest Control Log for the 300 Unit indicated: On 2/13/18 mice were sighted in the following rooms, #308, #309, #311, Office, #324, #328, #329. The log indicated: Need to seal holes in walls/trim tree away from building. A review of the Pest Control Log for the East Unit indicated: On 5/30/18 roaches were observed by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, staff and resident interview, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to respect the dignity and privacy for 1 of 42 (Resident #49) residents in the survey sample. 1. The facility staff routinely sat on Resident #49's couch in her room to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL) documentation which infringed upon her privacy. Resident #49 was admitted to the nursing facility on 4/8/14 with diagnoses that included stroke and Parkinson's disease. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was a quarterly dated 6/1/18 and coded Resident #49 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 15 out of a possible score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact in the skills needed for daily decision making. On 8/21/18 at approximately 2:00 p.m., a surveyor observed CNA #1 sitting on Resident #49's couch using an electronic device that was similar to a cell phone. On 8/22/18 at 10:00 a.m., during a group interview with 6 facility residents, they stated the Certified Nursing Assistants use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-08-23 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolatedNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on an Employee Record Review, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to obtain a Criminal Background Check for 1 staff member, Dietary Aide #1. The facility staff failed to obtain a Criminal Background Check for Dietary Aide #1, with a hire date of 9/15/17. The findings included: On 8/22/18 an Employee Record Review was conducted on 25 current employees from 8/20/16 to 8/20/18. The employee record for Dietary Aide #1, with hire date of 9/15/17 did not contain Virginia State Police criminal background check. On 8/23/18 at 10:24 AM an interview was conducted with the Human Resources Manager and she was asked to present documentation of the criminal background check for Dietary Aide #1, hired on the date of 9/15/18. The Human Resources Manager stated, We do not have it, I even checked with dietary department and corporate and we don't have it. On 8/23/18 at 12:11 PM an interview was conducted with the facilities Executive Director and he stated, I have spoken with the Human Resources Manager and understand we do not have this employee's criminal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-08-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the Employee Record Review, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy and procedure to obtain a Criminal Background Check for all newly hired employees. The facility staff failed to obtain a criminal background check for 1 current staff member (Dietary Aide #1) with a hire date of 9/15/17. The findings included: On 8/22/18 an Employee Record Review was conducted on 25 current employees hired from 8/20/16 to 8/20/18. The employee record for 1 current employee (Dietary Aide #1) with a hire date of 9/15/17 did not contain a Virginia State Police criminal background check. On 8/23/18 at 10:24 AM an interview was conducted with the Human Resources Manager and she was asked to present documentation of criminal background check for Dietary Aide #1's record with hire date of 9/15/18. Human Resources Manager stated, We do not have it, I even checked with dietary department and corporate and we don't have it. On 8/23/18 at 12:11 PM an interview was conducted with the facility's Executive Director and he stated, I have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility document review the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to include the risk of unsafe wandering for 1 of 42 resident in the survey sample, Resident #162. The facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to include the risk of unsafe wandering after the resident was identified as a significant risk of getting to a potentially dangerous place on the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #162 who eloped from the facility on 8/19/17. The findings included: 1. Resident #162 was a [AGE] year old admitted to the facility originally on 6/29/17 and then re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of (1). Dementia, (2). Liver Carcinoma, and (3). Communication Deficit. The Resident #162's admission 5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/6/17 was reviewed. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility document review the facility staff failed to maintain an environment as free as possible of accident hazards for 3 of 42 Residents in the survey sample (Residents #241, #47, and #28). 1. For Resident #241, who required supervision with smoking, the facility staff failed to ensure that his smoking materials were secured outside of the designated smoking activity. 2. For Resident #47, the facility staff failed to ensure that his smoking materials were secured outside of the designated smoking activity. 3. For Resident #28 the facility staff failed to ensure that his smoking materials were secured outside of the designated smoking activity. The findings included: 1. Resident #241 was observed to have smoking materials which included cigarettes and a lighter. Resident #241 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of renal disease, muscle weakness, neurogenic bladder, and hypertension. Resident #241 had a Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-08-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, a Resident Interview, staff interviews, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure a dialysis Resident received the necessary care and services to include assessment of an Arteriovenous (AV) fistula hemodialysis access site for bruit and thrill for 1 of 42 Residents in the survey sample, Resident #67. The Facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #67's Arteriovenous fistula hemodialysis access site was adequately assessed for bruit and thrill. Description from https://www.davita.com/treatment-services/dialysis/vascular-access-your-lifeline-to-hemodialysis: Learn the feel of the thrill or vibration of blood going through your access and check it several times a day. Call your dialysis care team immediately if the flow stops or changes. This could mean a blood clot. With quick action, many clots can be dissolved or removed. Learn to listen with a stethoscope to the sound (called bruit) of blood flowing (whooshing) through your access. If the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-08-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, a Resident Interview, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure competency in assessing an Arteriovenous Fistula hemodialysis access for bruit and thrill for 1 (Resident #67) of 42 residents in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #67's Arteriovenous Fistula hemodialysis access was adequately assessed for *bruit and thrill. The findings included: Resident #67 was a [AGE] year old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include (1.) Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3, and (2.) Dependence on Renal Dialysis. The most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was an Annual with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/3/18. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was a 15 out of a possible 15 which indicated that Resident #67 cognitively intact and capable of daily decision making. Under Section O Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs, Resident #67 was coded as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, observation, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure complete and accurate clinical records for 2 of 42 residents (Resident #440 and #240) in the survey sample. 1. The facility staff failed to ensure the clinical record was accurate for Resident #440; a progress note indicated resident was a status post right hip fracture with staples when in fact was not. 2. The facility staff failed to retain Resident #240's clinical record after new management took over the facility. The findings included: 1. Resident #440 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #440 included but not limited to *Dementia with behavioral disturbance. *Dementia with behavioral disturbances is frequently the most challenging manifestations of dementia and are exhibited in almost all people with dementia. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22644311 The current Minimum Data Set (MDS), a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$90,896 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $90,896 — penalty dated 2024-10-09
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.2 | -2.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC MSTR LSCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/01/2017 |
| STOLTZ, CHARLES | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2017 |
| ROMEO, DOMINIC | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2023 |
| WILHEIM, RONALD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/01/2017 |
| COLUMBIA MGT CO., LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/26/2025 |
| ELEBIARY, AHMED | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2023 |
| GROVES, DONNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| WALTON, DEAULO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/31/2025 |
| ODENTHAL, RICHARD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/23/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495155. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.