No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Allison Pointe Healthcare Center

5226 E 82nd Street, Indianapolis, IN 46250 · For profit - Corporation · 144 certified beds · (317) 842-6668 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Aug 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$56,381 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (69) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $56,381 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-03)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 27% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
8034 Castleway Ct W Ste 200 · (317) 841-5050 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi<0.1 mi
5151 E 82nd St · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5875 Castle Creek Parkway North Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
7900 Allisonville Rd · (317) 849-1565

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.2%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.5%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms74.9%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.2%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.2%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.7%3.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.6%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.2%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine55.3%79.0%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 64 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.8%CMS range 32.7–62.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.6–13.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.1–10.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.00
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.37
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
58.1%
Total nursing turnover
62.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 108.5 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-25)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-04)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

69 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 57 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2a The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on [DATE] at 9:22 a.m. Resident D's diagnoses included, but not limited to, cancer of the tongue, diabetes mellitus Type II, hydrocephalus (extra fluid in the brain causing pressure) with VP shunt (Ventriculoperitoneal shunt, a tube inserted into a hole in the skull too drain excess fluid and relieve pressure on the brain) and status post laryngectomy (removal of larynx, voice box). A university hospital's discharge instructions for Resident D were provided by ED (Executive Director) on [DATE] at 2:24 p.m. The discharge instructions indicated, Resident D had tongue cancer and underwent surgery to remove his larynx (voice box), tongue, the lymph nodes from both sides of his neck and a VP shunt revision. The medication reconciliation indicated Resident D was on the following medications: Folic Acid 1 mg (milligram) once a day via G-tube (Gastrostomy, stomach tube used for medications, hydration, and enteral feeding) Lansoprazole ( a stomach ulcer medication) 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure a resident received timely foot care related to a referral for a vascular specialist and treatment for osteomyelitis, resulting in a hospitalization for intravenous antibiotics and subsequent toe removal for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for foot care. (Resident E) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 4/7/26 at 10:00 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, peripheral artery disease (circulatory condition caused by plaque buildup, narrowing arteries, and reduces blood flow to the limbs). The impaired skin integrity care plan, revised 3/31/26, indicated the resident had areas to his left fourth and fifth toes. A goal was for him to not exhibit complications from altered skin integrity. An intervention was to administer treatments as ordered by the medical provider. The progress note, dated 2/12/26 and written by Nurse Practitioner (NP) 5, indicated the resident had a wound to his left toe, fifth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served with proper hand hygiene, coffee was covered when transported in hallways, food trays were air dried prior to storage, and the kitchen environment was clean related to ceiling vents potentially affecting 102 of 109 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: On 2/19/26 at 9:50 a.m., the facility kitchen was observed with the Head Chef (HC) and the Dietary Corporate Consultant (DCC). A dietary staff member was removing clean, wet food trays from a dishwashing rack and stacking them on a cart. The ceiling vents above the food preparation area and the food service area were noted to have dust built up. On 2/19/26 at 12:14 p.m., lunch service was observed on the Cambridge Unit. A coffee pitcher was on top of the food cart. The nursing staff were reaching up and taking the pitcher of coffee off the top of the food cart, pouring coffee for residents, and then placing the pitcher back on top of the food cart. The coffee pitcher did not have a lid and was open to air. The nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for 7 of 31 rooms, 1 of 2 exit doors, and 1 of 2 Nurse's Stations reviewed for environment. Doorknobs were loose, urine odor was present, designated smoking area exit door frame was pulled away from the wall, and a wall was in disrepair. (Cambridge Unit Rooms, 226, 228, 230, 231, 233, 210, Cambridge Bistro exit door, and [NAME] Nurse's Station). Findings include: On 2/19/26 at 12:27 p.m., the following was observed, the Cambridge Unit had an odor of urine and the [NAME] Unit had visible water damage (loosening paint, with a rippling effect, down the wall) to the wall behind the nurse's station. On 2/20/26 at 11:11 a.m., the following was observed, the doorknobs for the following resident rooms on Cambridge Unit were loose, room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 2/24/26 at 1:17 p.m., the following was observed, an odor of urine was present at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and determine it was clinically appropriate for a resident to self-medicate for 1 of 1 resident randomly observed with medications at the bedside. (Resident 56) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 56 was reviewed on 2/20/26 at 11:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to: end stage renal disease (below 15% [percent] functioning kidneys) An observation was made of Resident 56 on 2/23/26 at 12:00 p.m. The resident was observed lying in bed with a bedside table next to the bed. Two plastic cups were observed sitting on the bedside table. One cup had pill medications in it, and the second cup was sitting inside the cup with ice in it. Resident 56's clinical record did not include documentation she was able to safely self-medicate her medications. An interview was conducted with License Practical Nurse (LPN) 10 on 2/23/26 at 12:05 p.m. She indicated the pill medications were Resident 56's morning medications. The resident was scheduled to go to dialysis early that day. On dialysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was in reach for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for call lights. (Residents 41 and 116) Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 41 was reviewed on 2/20/2026 at 2:23 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia (severe weakness or total paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral vascular disease affecting the left dominant side, generalized anxiety disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/19/25, indicated Resident 41 was moderately cognitively impaired, could usually make herself understood, and had the ability to usually understand others. The MDS indicated Resident 41 had impairment on one side to upper and lower extremity on one side, was dependent on toileting/hygiene, and required substantial/maximal assistance with rolling side to side, sitting up, and toileting transfers. During an observation and interview with Resident 41 on 2/19/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide extra portions of oatmeal as preferred and ordered for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for choices. (Resident 51) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 51 was reviewed on 2/20/26 at 2:19 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, respiratory failure and cerebral infarction (death of brain tissue) affecting the left non-dominant side. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/28/26, indicated Resident 51 had moderate cognitive impairment. A physician's order, dated 10/14/25, indicated Resident 51 had a regular diet order and was to receive two servings of fortified oatmeal for breakfast. During an interview with Resident 51 on 2/19/26 at 12:42 p.m., they indicated they did not receive the daily double portions of oatmeal for breakfast. Resident 51 indicated he would have to always ask for another portion of oatmeal in the mornings. During an observation and interview on 2/23/2026 at 9:37 a.m., Resident 51 had his breakfast tray sitting in front of him. The food included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely develop dental care plans for 2 of 2 resident's reviewed for dental care (Resident 51 and Resident 12).Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 51 was reviewed on 2/19/25 at 12:43 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hypertension. A dental consult noted, dated 12/19/25, indicated Resident 51 required a referral to an oral surgeon to have two teeth extracted. He was missing multiple teeth, and his oral tissue was red and irritated. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, completed 1/28/26, indicated he had moderately impaired cognition, was usually able to make himself understood and to understand others, and needed set up assistance with oral hygiene. The clinical record did not contain a care plan addressing Resident 51's dental care needs.2. The clinical record for Resident 12 was reviewed on 2/20/26 at 10:24 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, diabetes and hypertension.An oral assessment, dated 1/15/25, indicated Resident 12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to hold a resident's medication when vital signs were outside parameters for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Hospitalization, ensure an insulin flex pen was primed with 2 units of insulin prior to the administration of the insulin dosage, and administer lidocaine cream as ordered for 2 of 38 residents observed for quality of care. (Resident 92, Resident 115 and Resident 119)Findings include:1.The clinical record for Resident 119 was reviewed on 2/20/26 at 1:28 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hypertension. A physician's order, dated 12/11/25, indicated he was to receive Coreg oral tablet (medication used to treat high blood pressure) 12.5 milligram (mg) twice daily. The staff were to hold the resident's medication for systolic blood pressure (upper number of blood pressure reading) less than or equal to 120. The December 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated Resident 119 received Coreg when his systolic blood pressure was less than or equal to 120 on the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide fluids at the bedside for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hydration and a diet as ordered for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for nutrition/hydration. (Resident 56 and 116) Findings include: 1.The clinical record for Resident 116 was reviewed on 2/20/2026 at 2:25 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing, causing pain or choking), profound intellectual disabilities, and contractures (permanent, painful tightening of the muscles, tendons, ligaments or skin) of the right wrist and left elbow and hand. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/8/26, indicated Resident 116 was severely cognitively impaired, had upper extremity impairment on one side, was dependent with all activities of daily living (ADLS), and was on a mechanically altered diet. During an observation on 2/19/26 at 2:15 p.m. and on 2/20/26 at 1:28 p.m., Resident 116 was in her bed and did not have any fluids at the bedside. During an observation on 2/23/26 at 9:40 a.m., Resident 116 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely obtain outside dental services and to timely inform the physician of dental pain for 1 of 2 resident's reviewed for dental services ( Resident 51). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 51 was reviewed on 2/19/25 at 12:43 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hypertension. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, completed 1/28/26, indicated he had moderately impaired cognition, was usually able to make himself understood and to understand others, and needed set up assistance with oral hygiene. A dental consult noted, dated 12/19/25, indicated Resident 51 required a referral to an oral surgeon to have two teeth extracted. A Social Services Note, dated 1/20/26, indicated an oral surgery office had been contacted for an appointment. Information had been faxed to the office, and the office would follow up with facility after the information was reviewed. A Social Services Note, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control by not utilizing hand hygiene prior to donning gloves to administer eye medications for 2 of 38 residents observations for medication administrations and administered a pill medication that had dropped on the floor for 1 of 1 random observation related to infection control. (Residents 15, 92, and 113) Findings include:1.The clinical record for Resident 113 was reviewed on 2/20/26 at 10:45 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, heart failure( chronic progressive condition where the heart muscle becomes too weak or stiff to pump enough oxygen rich blood to meet the body's needs). An observation was made of a medication administration on 2/20/26 at 10:00 a.m. License Practical Nurse (LPN) 11 was administering pill medications to Resident 113. During that time, the resident dropped 1 pill medication from the medication cup onto the floor. LPN 11 was observed picking up the pill medication with her bare hands and handing it back to the resident. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 57 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 7 residents reviewed for resident rights had their resident's rights honored related to personal property request by a facility staff member. (Resident B) Findings include:In an interview with Resident B on 12-29-25 at 1:45 p.m., she indicated on 12-9-25 between 8:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m., LPN 3 came to her and told me that she had heard I had a vehicle I might be interested in selling because she had heard that I might not be needing it anymore. For starters, why would she or any of the staff be discussing me or my business amongst themselves? Plus, with my diagnosis of breast cancer, that kind of makes me think they know something that I don't know. How is that appropriate in any manner? Resident B indicated LPN 3 told her that her family member was needing to buy a car to use for college. In an interview on 12-29-25 at 3:45 p.m., with the Executive Director (ED) she indicated she received a phone call from LPN 3 on the evening of 12-9-25, in which LPN 3 notified her she had inadvertently got a resident worked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a controlled substance medication received from the contracted pharmacy was properly processed and safely stored in the facility for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident E) Findings include:A facility reported incident was received by the Indiana Department of Health's (IDOH) Long Term Care Division on 11-18-25 at 7:14 p.m. The report indicated the facility had received a delivery of a controlled medication, oxycodone, for Resident E on 11-15-25, but the medication was unable to be accounted for. It indicated notifications were made to the resident, resident representative, the Executive Director, the Director of Nursing, the attending physician, and the local law enforcement agency and an investigation was launched immediately. It indicated the nurse on duty for Resident E on the date of 11-15-25, was immediately suspended, pending results of the investigation. A medication reconciliation was initiated. Pain and skin assessments were initiated. Staff and resident interviews were initiated. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document controlled medications in sufficient detail to ensure an accurate reconciliation of the narcotic count for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for pain and ensure an intravenous (IV) antibiotic was administered timely for a newly admitted resident and completely for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for IV medications (Resident B, Resident L, Resident H, and Resident D). Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident L was reviewed on 6/12/25 at 3:10 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, opioid dependence, low back pain, muscle weakness, and lumbago with sciatica (lower back pain accompanied by sciatic nerve pain). A care plan, revised 5/15/25, indicated Resident L was at risk for pain related to end stage renal disease. The goal was for Resident L to be able to verbalize relief of pain. The interventions included, but were not limited to, providing medication per physician's orders. A physician's order, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The clinical record for Resident M was reviewed on 6/12/25 at 2:20 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety disorder, fracture of the right upper humerus (arm bone). He was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The acute care hospital discharge instructions, dated [DATE], indicated Resident M was to receive the following medications upon admission to the facility: 1. Aspirin 81 milligram (mg) two times daily, 2. gabapentin (anti-seizure medication) 400 mg three times daily, 3. levetiracetam (anti-seizure medication) 500 mg two times daily, 4. lorazepam (anti-anxiety medication) one mg once daily, 5. methocarbamol (muscle relaxer) 500 mg, two tablets every six hours, 6. oxycodone-acetaminophen (narcotic pain medication) 10 mg - 325 mg, two tablets every four hours as needed for pain, 7. clonazepam (anti-anxiety medication) one mg tablet two times daily, 8. losartan (high blood pressure medication) 50 mg once daily, and 9. paroxetine (anti-depressant) 40 mg once daily. The June 2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely obtain Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for medication availability. (Resident H) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident H was reviewed on 6/12/25 at 10:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, perforation of intestine and peritoneal abscess. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The on-boarding clinical evaluation provided by the discharging facility indicated Resident H's diagnoses/reasons for admission included, but were not limited to, TPN (artificial nutrition to be administered intravenously). It also indicated Resident H was alert and oriented. An order for Clinimix (a variation of TPN) 8/14, and Clinolipid (fat emulsion supplement) were entered on 6/6/25. The Clinimix was to run intravenously at a continuous rate of 65 milliliters (mL)/hour, and the Clinolipid was to run intravenously at a rate of 21 mL/hour on the evenings of Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely address a resident's pain for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for pain management. (Resident H) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident H was reviewed on 6/12/25 at 10:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, perforation of intestine and peritoneal abscess. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The on-boarding clinical evaluation provided by the discharging facility indicated Resident H was alert and oriented. An order was entered, on 6/6/25, for oxycodone immediate release (IR) 10 mg, one tablet as needed every six hours for moderate to severe pain. On 6/12/25 at 1:07 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident H. She indicated on the day she arrived she asked staff several times about when she was going to get her medications and they kept telling her the pharmacy is on their way. Resident H indicated she was in pain and was vomiting and crying. She indicated Registered Nurse (RN) 3 had given her oxycodone the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident remained free from significant medication errors by receiving the incorrect narcotic pain medication on multiple occasions for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident L) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident L was reviewed on 6/12/25 at 3:10 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, opioid dependence, low back pain, muscle weakness, and lumbago with sciatica (lower back pain accompanied by sciatic nerve pain). A care plan, revised 5/15/25, indicated Resident L was at risk for pain related to end stage renal disease. The goal was for Resident L to be able to verbalize relief of pain. The interventions included, but were not limited to, providing medication per physician's orders. A physician order, dated 5/19/25 to 5/28/25, indicated the use of oxycodone 5 milligrams (mg); administer one tablet every four hours for pain. A physician order, dated 5/28/25 to 6/6/25, indicated the use of oxycodone-acetaminophen (narcotic pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to attempt non- pharmacological interventions for pain, to assess pain levels prior to administering an as needed pain medication, and to assess the effectiveness of as needed pain medication for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pain (Resident C). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 4/3/25 at 11:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), aphasia (inability to swallow), and hemiplegia (inability to move one side of the body). He was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A physician's order, dated 2/10/25, indicated to monitor pain every shift. A physician's order, dated 2/10/25, indicated to administer oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) immediate release (IR) 5 milligram (mg); give one tablet every six hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. A care plan, last revised on 2/11/25, indicated he was at risk for pain related to stroke,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control by staff not donning a gown when providing personal care for a resident in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and not ensuring soiled linen was not placed directly on the floor for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). (Resident C) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 4/3/25 at 11:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), aphasia (inability to swallow), and hemiplegia (inability to move one side of the body), and tracheostomy. A physician's order, dated 2/12/25, indicated Resident C was receiving enhanced barrier precautions related to having a tracheostomy, gastric tube, and wounds. It was to occur when dressing, bathing, showering, transferring, changing linen, providing hygiene, changing briefs, or assisting with toileting. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed 2/17/25, indicated Resident C was non- verbal and could not make his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-04 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address grievances that were reported in resident council meetings for 9 of 9 residents that attended a resident council meeting. (Residents' 1, 8, 12, 28, 39, 63, 67, 71, and 73) Findings include: The November 2024, December 2024, and January 2025 resident council minutes did not indicate any concerns that were discussed with the following departments: nursing, housekeeping, laundry, business office, activities, and maintenance. A resident council meeting was conducted on 1/29/25 at 2:00 p.m. The resident attendees were Residents' 1, 8, 12, 28, 39, 63, 67, 71, and 73. During the meeting, the resident council indicated the staff do not answer the call lights timely. This had been ongoing for a while and had not improved. It was not discussed at previous resident council meetings. An interview was conducted with the Activities Director on 2/3/25 at 8:58 a.m. She indicated grievances discussed in the resident council meetings were only recorded in the meeting minutes if the entire group had reported a concern. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food at palatable temperatures for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for food (Resident 24, Resident 14, Resident C, and Resident 44). Findings include: 1 a. The clinical record for Resident 24 was reviewed on 1/30/25. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed 11/1/24, indicated he was cognitively intact. During an interview on 1/30/25 at 10:04 a.m., Resident 24 indicated his food was not always hot when he received it. 1 b. The clinical record for Resident 14 was reviewed on 1/29/25 at 10:20 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A Quarterly MDS assessment, completed 11/06/24, indicated he was cognitively intact. During an interview on 1/29/25 at 10:29 a.m., Resident 14 indicated when food was delivered the hot items were not hot and the cold items were not cold. 1 c. The clinical record for Resident 44 was reviewed on 1/29/25 at 10:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident's ability to communicate and regarding Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for communication and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASRR (Resident E and Resident 28). Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 1/29/25 at 11:27 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes and malnutrition. An Annual MDS assessment, completed 1/2/25, indicated Resident E had clear speech. He was rarely or never able to understand what was said to him or to make himself understood. During an interview on 1/31/25 at 11:37 a.m., Unit Manager 4 indicated Resident E was able to speak and understand English enough to communicate his needs. During an interview on 2/3/25 at 11:20 a.m., Resident E indicated the facility staff treated him well. During an interview on 2/3/25 at 11:31 a.m., the Social Service Assistant indicated Resident E could make his needs known, but at times…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided and to ensure lotion was applied with personal hygiene for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). (Resident B and Resident E) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 1/28/25 at 3:30 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, respiratory failure. An 11/25/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident B was cognitively impaired. The staff was to provide substantial/maximal assistance with bathing. An ADL care plan, dated 10/10/24, indicated .offer shower evening shift, Tuesday and Friday . Observations were conducted of Resident B on 1/28/25 at 3:32 p.m., 1/31/25 at 10:52 a.m., and 2/3/25 at 11:25 a.m. Resident B's nails were observed long in length. An interview was conducted with Resident B's Representative on 1/30/25 at 3:48 p.m. She indicated Resident B was not provided with good hygiene care. An interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 on 2/3/25 at 11:34 a.m. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely provide foot care to 1 of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions. (Resident 7) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 7 was reviewed on 1/30/25 at 10:33 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, traumatic brain injury, dementia, chronic pain, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The 12/12/24 Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated he required substantial/maximal assistance for putting on and taking off footwear. The ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit care plan, revised 5/28/24, indicated he required assistance with ADLs, due to a functional deficit related to traumatic brain injury. The physician's orders indicated podiatry, as needed, effective 4/1/24. The 5/11/23 podiatry consent form indicated he requested to be seen for podiatry services, and to please have the podiatrist examine him for thickened, dystrophic (deformed, discolored, or thickened,) and/or painful nails with increased risk of infection. An observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care planned fall interventions were implemented timely for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for positioning (Resident 63). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 63 was reviewed on 01/28/25 at 1:50 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, personal history of transient ischemic attack, muscle weakness, and abnormal posture. A care plan, dated 04/04/24, indicated Resident 63 was at risk for falls. The goal was for the resident not to sustain major injury related to falls. The interventions included, but were not limited to, a mat to be placed on the floor at bedside, bed in lowest position, and ensure that bed locks are engaged, initiated on 07/25/22. On 01/28/25 at 11:43 a.m., Resident 63 was observed lying in bed with no mat on the floor at bedside. On 01/31/25 at 09:27 a.m., Resident 63 was observed lying in bed eating breakfast with no mat on the floor at bedside. On 02/03/25 02:09 p.m., Resident 63 was observed lying in bed with no mat on the floor at bedside. On 02/03/25 02:11…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control by not donning on personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing respiratory care for 1 of 2 random observations of respiratory care. (Resident 75) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 75 was reviewed on 1/28/25 at 11:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory distress syndrome, tracheostomy, and acute respiratory failure. A physician order, dated 10/22/24, indicated the resident was in enhanced barrier precautions every shift. An observation was made of Resident 75 in his room with Respiratory Therapist (RT) 2 on 1/28/25 at 11:49 a.m. RT 2 was observed at Resident 75's bedside providing respiratory care to the resident. At that time, RT 2 was not observed wearing a gown while providing respiratory care. An interview was conducted with the Regional [NAME] President of Risk Management on 1/28/25 at 3:42 p.m. She indicated RT 2 should have been wearing PPE while providing respiratory care. An Enhanced Barrier Precaution policy was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain residents' room in a clean manner and good repair for 2 of 10 residents reviewed for environmental concerns. (Resident 47 and 60) Findings include: 1. An observation of Resident 60's room was made on 1/29/25 at 1:34 p.m. The restroom floor had no tile or flooring. There were a significant number of small, brownish spots on the ceiling above her bed. The ceiling vent cover between her bed and restroom was pulling away from the ceiling. An environmental tour was conducted with the Maintenance Director and Administrator on 2/4/25 at 2:40 p.m. During the tour, Resident 60's room was observed. An interview was conducted with Resident 60 at that time. The small, brownish spots on the ceiling above her bed remained, and the ceiling vent cover between her bed and restroom remained pulled away from the ceiling. There was a screw on one side of the vent that was no longer affixed to the drywall above it. The restroom flooring was now placed, but there was a puddle of water built up in the back left corner of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring was completed of a resident on anticoagulant medications for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 9/20/24 at 1:00 p.m. The diagnoses included, but was not limited to, lung cancer and pulmonary embolism (blood clot in the lungs). The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A hospital discharge medication list, dated 9/13/24, indicated Resident B was to receive 0.7 milliliters (ml) enoxaparin injection medication (anticoagulant medication) twice a day while receiving 5 milligrams (mg) of warfarin (anticoagulant medication) daily. The staff was to obtain daily international normalized ratio (INR) test (blood test measures how long it takes the blood to clot) until he becomes therapeutic with INR levels within a 2-3 range; then discontinue the enoxaparin and continue with the daily warfarin. A physician order, dated 9/13/24, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to record urine outputs for residents utilizing a urinary catheter for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident F and Resident G) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident G was reviewed on 9/20/24 at 1:30 p.m. The diagnoses included, but was not limited to, paraplegia and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (bladder problems due to nerve/spinal cord damage). A care plan, dated 8/16/24, indicated Resident G had an indwelling and suprapubic (tube that drains urine from the bladder through a small incision in the lower abdomen) urinary catheters. A physician order, dated 8/15/24, indicated the resident had an 18 French (size of catheter) Foley Catheter (type of urinary catheter) to be changed every 30 days. A physician order, dated 8/15/24, indicated the staff was to measure and record the urine output every shift. A physician order, dated 8/15/24, indicated the staff was to empty the urostomy bag (an opening in the abdominal wall to redirect urine away from the bladder) every shift. The September…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident F) Finding include: The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 7/31/24 at 9:00 a.m. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, below the knee amputation (BKA). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/13/24, indicated Resident F was cognitively intact. An interview was conducted with Resident F on 7/31/24 at 9:39 a.m. He indicated a night shift nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3, does not like him. He can't remember for sure what day, but believed, on 7/24/24, he had requested some pain medication from LPN 3. LPN 3 had responded to him and how she had just given him his medications and he was f p her off. During that time, LPN 3 had called him a drug addict. The resident indicated he and LPN 3 were cussing at each other. She then left his room. The only other person in the room was his roommate, Resident V, and he does not hear very well. An interview was conducted with Resident V on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician was notified of elevated blood glucose readings per physician's order for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident C) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 7/30/24 at 11:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but was not limited to, diabetes type I, end stage renal disease (ESRD), major depressive disorder, and neuropathy (weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve damage). An interview with Resident C conducted, on 7/30/24 at 12:17 p.m., indicated, there were numerous times the facility did not administer her insulin, and she had given herself her own insulin from her personal supply she had prior to her admission to the facility. A physician's order, dated 6/21/24, indicated Resident C was to give 10 units of Glargine insulin (long acting insulin) twice daily for diabetes. A physician's order, dated 6/21/24, indicated Resident C was to inject Humalog insulin (short-acting insulin) subcutaneously as per the sliding scale: If blood glucose was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the timely reporting of a resident's unusual swelling of his left thigh/leg, which was identified as a left hip fracture, to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. (Resident P) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident P was reviewed on 7/31/24 at 11:30 a.m. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, paraplegia (chronic condition that affects the lower half of the body, causing loss of muscle function and sensory or motor impairment). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/19/24, indicated Resident P was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate assistance to transfer from bed to chair and to get in/out of a tub/shower. A Facility Reported Incident, dated 2/2/24 at 8:30 p.m., indicated Resident P had a self-reported fall. The report indicated the type of injury sustained was a left hip fracture. The immediate action taken was Resident P had a self-reported fall to the Nurse Practitioner and his left hip was noted to be swollen. Resident P…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 reportable incidents reviewed. (Resident N) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident N was reviewed on 8/01/24 at 10:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of mandible, fracture of fourth metatarsal bone to right foot, and pain. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. The resident discharged on 6/11/24. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/29/24, indicated Resident N was cognitively intact. A reportable incident, dated 5/22/24, indicated the following, .Resident [N] reported that he walked to his door entry and yelled that he was in pain. He stated that the nurse [[License Practical Nurse [LPN] 3]] allegedly told him to get back in bed. Resident stated that later the nurse came to his room and allegedly stated that she would not give him his medication . The complete investigation file for Resident N, dated 5/22/24, was provided by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered and an Orthopedic appointment and DEXA scan (a bone density test) were scheduled in a timely manner for a resident who had an acute distal tibial and fibula fracture for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse and/or neglect and for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident F and Resident P) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 7/31/24 at 9:00 a.m. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, below the knee amputation (BKA). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/13/24, indicated Resident F was cognitively intact. A care plan, dated 5/7/24, indicated Resident F has complaints of acute/chronic pain or at risk for pain .Follow physician orders for complaint of pain . A care plan, dated 5/7/24, indicated Resident F has impaired skin integrity, or at risk for altered skin integrity r/t [related to] left BKA and opened wound to right shin . A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess or address a resident's pain for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pain. (Resident N) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident N was reviewed on 8/01/24 at 10:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of mandible, fracture of fourth metatarsal bone to right foot, and pain. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. The resident discharged on 6/11/24. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/29/24, indicated Resident N was cognitively intact. An admission evaluation for Resident N, dated 5/22/24, indicated the following, .Does the resident complain of pain? yes, Date of pain onset, if known .5/20/24. How frequent does the pain occur? every 4 hours. location of pain - right hip fracture and 4th and 5th toe fractures. Times when pain is worse: morning, night. Feeling of pain: acute .Based on assessment, enter residents severity level of pain (0-10) .8. Resident is to explain what their pain feels like .acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate reconciliation of narcotic medications and assure names and signatures of dispensing nurses were present on the narcotic control record for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident F) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 7/31/24 at 9:00 a.m. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, below the knee amputation (BKA). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/13/24, indicated Resident F was cognitively intact. A physician's order, dated 6/26/24, indicated Resident F was to receive 15 milligrams of oxycodone every 4 hours for pain. The medication was discontinued on 7/20/24. Resident F's controlled drug administration record for 15 milligrams of oxycodone indicated a count of 10 tablets. The record indicated the following documented recordings: On 7/20/24 at 12:00 p.m., a total amount of tablets was 3, 1 tablet was removed with a remaining total of 2 tablets. On 7/20/24 at 4:00 p.m., a total amount of tablets was 2, 1 tablet was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' clinical records were complete and accurate for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for tube feeding and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident C and Resident E) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 7/30/24 at 1:00 p.m. The diagnosis included but was not limited to: tracheostomy. A physician order, dated 4/1/24, indicated Resident E was to receive enteral feeding every shift. Staff were to check and record residuals every 8 hours. If residuals were greater than 100 milliliters (ml), hold feeding and notify medical provider. A physician order, dated 4/1/24, indicated Resident E was to receive enteral feeding every shift. The staff was to document the total formula and water intake every shift. The May 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR), indicated the residuals for Resident E's enteral feeding was recorded on day, evening, and night shift as the following: - day shift: 5/1/24 - NA (nonapplicable), 5/3/24 - 200 ml, 5/6/24 - 480 ml, 5/8/24 - 200…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely obtain medications from the pharmacy, to accurately document administration of medications, and to timely obtain pain medication from the emergency drug supply for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for medication availability. (Resident B, D, and H). Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 2/19/24 at 11:15 a.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, quadriplegia (loss of movement of all 4 limbs) and anoxic (lack of oxygen) brain injury. A care plan, initiated 5/5/22, indicated Resident B had impaired cognitive function due to a head injury. The goal was for all areas of care to be met by staff. The interventions included, but were not limited to, administer medications as ordered, initiated 5/5/22, communicate with resident, family, and caregivers regarding his capabilities and needs, initiated 5/5/22. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, completed 12/13/23, indicated he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the tile walls in a cleanly manner in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 117 residents in the facility. Findings include: An observation was conducted of the kitchen with the District Dietary Manager (DDM), on 12/5/23 at 10:50 a.m. There was a dark substance that appeared liked caked dirt, debris, and/or grease located on the tile behind the double oven along the top part of the preparation area adjacent to the double oven. The DDM indicated they had rented a pressure washer to clean parts of the kitchen but that had not be utilized for the wall tile. They have attempted to scrub parts of the tile wall but not all of such. An observation was conducted of the kitchen with the DDM, on 12/5/23 at 12:05 p.m. There was a dark substance that appeared like caked dirt, debris, and/or grease located on the tile behind the double oven, the top part of the preparation area adjacent to the double oven, and along the tile located behind the pre rinse area in the dish room towards the floor. An interview conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physicians' order was in place for the use of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and clarify physicians; order upon readmission for the utilization of TPN for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for intravenous (IV) therapy. (Resident H) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident H was reviewed on 12/6/23 at 1:38 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, tracheostomy status, diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, and history of infectious and parasitic diseases. Resident H was readmitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. An observation conducted on 12/5/23 at 12:52 p.m. of Resident H lying in her bed with an IV device to her right chest. It was connected to a bag that contained TPN running at 75 milliliters (mL) an hour. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 was present and indicated the TPN was connected by night shift, and she monitors the site and administration of TPN during her shift. Upon review of Resident H's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the trash compactor did not have trash items located outside of the unit for 1 of 2 trash disposal items observed. Findings include: An observation was conducted, on 12/5/23 at 10:50 a.m., of the outside of the kitchen to where a trash compactor and a trash receptacle adjacent to the trash compactor. The trash compactor had bags of trash and other numerous items of trash located on the ground, beside the trash compactor. Another observation was conducted, on 12/5/23 at 12:10 p.m., of the trash compactor. It contained 2 trash bags and other random items of trash located right outside of the trash compactor. An interview conducted with the District Dietary Manager, on 12/5/23 at 2:05 p.m., indicated she noticed writer was observing the outside trash receptacles. She then noticed the trash located outside of the trash compactor. She went to get staff assistance and they proceeded to clean up the trash that was located outside of the trash compactor. She wasn't sure how often the trash is picked up but sometimes, if the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-03 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to input physicians orders into the electronic medical record, recognize a change in condition, and follow-up with a change in condition. This had the potential to affect all 108 residents that reside in the facility. Findings include: Resident B did not have admission orders entered into the electronic medical record accurately, timely, and that such orders were administered as ordered by the physician for a resident who later experienced a change in condition that was not documented in the medical record. Cross reference F684. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:21p.m., LPN 26 indicated she had worked on [DATE] from 6:00 p.m. until [DATE] at 6:00 a.m. To LPN 26's knowledge, Resident B's admission orders had been taken care of by UM 22. LPN 26 was a fairly new employee to the facility. She had not received report from the previous shift. LPN 26 had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-03 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to carry out timely meal service at the facility for 96 of 108 residents who are served food from the kitchen. Findings include: The ED provided the Meal Service Schedule for the facility on 10/26/23 at 11:00 a.m. It indicated breakfast started at 7:00 a.m. The Cambridge Unit was served at 7:30 a.m. The Main Dining Room was served at 7:45 a.m. The [NAME] Unit was served at 8:15 a.m. It indicated lunch started at 12:00 p.m. The Cambridge Unit was served at 12:30 p.m. The Main Dining room was served at 12:45 p.m. The [NAME] Unit was served 1:15 p.m. It indicated dinner started 5:00 p.m. The Cambridge Unit was served at 5:30 p.m. The Main Dining Room was served at 5:45 p.m. The [NAME] Unit was served at 6:15 p.m. An interview was conducted with Resident 24, who resided on the [NAME] Unit, on 10/27/23 at 10:10 a.m. She indicated the food just sat on the food cart was never served hot. An interview was conducted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and served at an appetizing temperature for 96 of 108 residents who eat food from the kitchen. (Residents 8, 24, 225, 226, and 228) Findings include: An interview was conducted with Resident 8 on 10/27/23 at 10:56 a.m. They indicated the food sucks, and you wouldn't serve it to an animal. The quality was horrible and didn't have the right nutrients. Resident 8 ate a lot of peanut butter and jelly, because the food was so bad. An interview was conducted with Resident 24 on 10/27/23 at 10:10 a.m. She indicated the food was never served hot, sat on the food cart for a long time, and was not quality food. The oatmeal served at breakfast was so sticky, you could wad it up, throw it on the wall, and it would stick. The kitchen served out of date milk and food you wouldn't feed to a dog. She never got a hot plate. The only thing the kitchen could trick you with is a boiled egg. Everything they served was low…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store clean dishes, bread in the dry storage area, and refrigerated foods and maintain kitchen equipment in a clean, sanitary condition for 96 of 108 residents in the facility. Findings include: A tour of the kitchen was conducted with the District Dietary Manager (DDM) on 10/26/23 at 11:30 a.m. An interview was conducted with the DDM during this tour. During the initial tour, the preparation refrigerator was observed. There was an opened box of orange juice for the orange juice dispenser with an open bag containing the orange juice contents. the open bag was sticking out of the front of the box. There was orange juice contents on the open bag and box, exposed to air. The DDM indicated the orange juice bag was typically contained within the box. During the initial tour, the stove hood was observed. There was a missing vent cover with exposed pipes. There was a cobweb hanging between 2 front sprinkler pipes directly over the stove. There was a heavy amount of dried splash on the stove and ovens. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the floors in a cleanly manner in the kitchen for 96 of 108 residents in the facility. Findings include: A tour of the kitchen was conducted with the DDM (District Dietary Manager) on 10/26/23 at 11:30 a.m. During the tour, the stove and oven area was observed. There was a significant amount of dark gunky looking debris and food particles stuck to the floor underneath the stove area. The DDM indicated the floors should be swept and mopped nightly, but it did not look like it was done last night. During the tour, thee walk in refrigerator was observed. There was dark, gunky debris built up around thee baseboards of the floor in the refrigerator. The DDM indicated mopping should be done daily and deep cleaning monthly. During the tour, the dishwasher area was observed. There was a significant amount of gunky debris and mineral scale build up underneath the dishwasher machine. The Environment policy was provided by the ED (Executive Director) on 10/31/23 at 12:07 p.m. It read, The Dining Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-03 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective training program for all new and exisiting staff by determining the amount and types of training necessary based on the facility assessment that included, but were not limited to, inputting physician orders, clarifying physician orders, identification of a change in a residents' condition, follow-up with a change in condition, notification of the physician, and documentation in the medical record. The facility failed to ensure newly hired staff received orientation that was based on the training topics that aligned with the facility assessment. This had the potential to affect all 108 residents that reside in the facility. Findings include: Resident B did not have admission orders entered into the electronic medical record accurately, timely, and that such orders were administered as ordered by the physician for a resident who later experienced a change in condition that was not documented in the medical record. Cross reference…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for 7 of 12 resident rooms observed. (Residents 7, 32, 43, 62, 228, 226, and 69) Findings include: 1. An observation conducted of Resident 7's room on 10/26/23 at 3:39 p.m., noted the wall by the window with missing paint approximately the size of a ruler. The roommate of Resident 7 indicated the area of missing paint has been there for a while. The area of missing paint was still noted on 11/2/23 at 10:31 a.m. 2. An observation conducted of Resident 32's room, on 10/27/23 at 10:17 a.m., noted crumbs on wheelchair and built up dirt located on the legs of the bedside table. The crumbs were still located to the foot rests of the wheelchair along with built up of dirt to the legs of the bedside table on 11/2/23 at 10:33 a.m. 3. An observation conducted of Resident 43's room, on 10/26/23 at 11:33 a.m., noted an area of plastered dry wall beside the bed that was not painted. There was missing paint on the walls by both beds located in the room. The area of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to protect and value a resident's private space by not knocking on doors and requesting permission before entering a resident's room for 2 residents during a random observation (Resident 52 and 38) and not taking into account the physical limitations of a resident by not clearly explaining to a resident who is blind what she had placed on his bedside tray table nor where it was placed so that he may find it for 1 of 1 residents observed during a random observation (Resident 52). Findings include: 1. A random observation made on 10/30/23 at 3:14 p.m. observed CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) 20 passing out lunch trays. CNA 20 failed to knock and wait for permission to enter Resident 52's room when delivering his lunch tray. After exiting his room, she grabbed another tray from the dining cart and proceed to Resident 38's room where she failed again to knock and wait for permission to enter prior to entering the room. An interview with CNA 20 conducted on 10/30/23 at 3:16 p.m. indicated, she was aware she should have knocked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review, record the facility failed to have the Interdisciplinary team (IDT) determine and document a self medication assessment was clinically appropriate for 2 of 2 residents randomly observed with medications at the bedside. (Resident 12 and 83) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 83 was reviewed on 10/26/23. Resident 83's diagnoses included, but not limited to, bipolar, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and anxiety. A random observation conducted on 10/26/23 at 2 p.m. of Resident 83's room found on his bed side table a small white pill. When Resident 83 was asked about the pill, he stated he didn't know what the medication was but, then indicated to give it to him and he would take the pill now. It was explained to Resident 83 that if he was unaware of what the medication was, he probably shouldn't just take it but rather ask his nurse about it. An interview with Resident 83's QMA (Qualified Medication Assistant) 22 was conducted immediately following the random observation. QMA 22 indicated, she was unable to identify the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation,interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure continued provision of a wheel chair and to ensure a resident's television was positioned for viewing for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for personal property and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. (Resident E and Resident 50) . Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 10/30/23 at 10:46 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to: type 2 diabetes, hypertension, major depressive disorder. He was discharged from the facility to the hospital on 4/30/23, readmitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged to the hospital on 8/11/23, readmitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged to the hospital on 8/31/23, readmitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged to the hospital on 9/13/23. Resident E discharged to another facility when he left the hospital. The ADL (activities of daily living) self care performance deficit care plan, initiated 10/19/23, indicated he required assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely address a resident's guardian's grievances and to promptly resolve an oral grievance from a resident regarding missing clothing items for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for personal property. (Resident E and Resident 32) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 10/30/23 at 10:46 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to: type 2 diabetes, hypertension, major depressive disorder. He was discharged to the hospital on 8/11/23, readmitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged to the hospital on 8/31/23, readmitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged to the hospital on 9/13/23. Resident E discharged to another facility when he left the hospital. The ADL (activities of daily living) self care performance deficit care plan, initiated 10/19/23, indicated he required assistance with ADLs. An intervention was that he required extensive assistance with transfers, bed mobility, and toileting. The impaired cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of a resident's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASRR (Pre admission Screening Resident Review) and 2 of 3 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. (Resident 26, 83, and 69) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 26 was reviewed on 10/26/23 at 3:35 p.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to: bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and mild vascular dementia. Resident 26's 6/25/18 Summary of Preliminary Findings and Recommendations of PASRR/MI [Pre admission screening resident review/mental illness] Level II Mental Health Assessment indicated he was mentally ill and to continue current mental health services, medication monitoring, and medication administration. It indicated diagnoses of bipolar disorder, major depression, and anxiety disorder. Section A1500 of Resident 26's 4/12/23 Annual MDS assessment, completed by SS (Social Services) 26, indicated he was not considered by the state level II PASRR process to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely update an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care plan to reflect the resident's refusal of care and to ensure a resident's dialysis care plan was updated for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for ADL care and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Dialysis. (Resident 69 and Resident C) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 69 was reviewed on 10/26/23 at 12:13 p.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hypertension and anemia. A care plan, last revised on 8/1/23, indicated Resident 12 had an ADL self care performance deficit and required assistance with ADL care. The goals were for her to no have further declines in range of motion and to exhibit improved function. The interventions included, but were not limited to, Resident 12 required extensive assistance of 2 staff members for transfers. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, completed 9/27/23, indicated she was cognitively intact and was dependent on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide showers that included shaving and by not ensuring twice weekly showers/complete bed baths were provided for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. (Resident 225 and Resident F) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 225 was reviewed on 10/26/23 at 2:30 p.m. The diagnoses included but were not limited to: major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and blindness. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 225 was cognitively intact. The resident was needing partial/moderate assistance with bathing and supervision that included verbal cues and touching assistance for personal hygiene and dressing. An ADL care plan for Resident 225 indicated the resident was needing assistance with ADL's due to blindness. An observation was made of Resident 225 on 10/26/23 at 2:24 p.m. The resident was observed wearing blue jeans and a black…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to prevent a resident's range of motion from declining and failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment, equipment, and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for range of motion ( Resident 34 and 61). Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 61 was reviewed on 10/27/23 at 2:26 p.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure and age-related debility. An Occupational Therapy Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated that on 7/17/23, Resident 61's bilateral upper body strength was 4-/5 (part movement through full range against gravity and slight to moderate resistance). She was able to grasp and hold items with minimal assistance. She had been discharged from Occupational Therapy due to hospitalization. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, completed 8/12/23, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for the administration of gastrostomy tube (g-tube) bolus feedings for a random observation during medication administration. (Resident 95) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 95 was reviewed on 11/2/23 at 10:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, gastostomy status, congestive heart failure, and acute kidney failure. A current physician order was noted for [NAME] Farms tube feeding of 375 milliliters (mL) with 140 mL water flush every 4 hours. This order was on the computer screen for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5 to observe, on the electronic medication administration record (EMAR), prior to administration for Resident 95. A feeding tube care plan, revised 4/3/23, indicated to provide tube feeding per providers' orders. An observation conducted on 10/30/23 at 12:35 p.m., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5 administering a carton of [NAME] Farms tube feeding that contained 325…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure a resident had an inner canula present in her tracheostomy, as ordered by a physician, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tracheostomy care (Resident 61). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 61 was reviewed on 10/27/23 at 2:26 p.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, tracheostomy and chronic respiratory failure. A physician's order, dated 7/29/23, indicated to replace inner cannula during trach care daily and as needed. A physician's order, dated 7/29/23, indicated to provide trach care every shift and as needed. A care plan, last revised on 7/31/23, indicated Resident 61 was receiving tracheostomy care due to respiratory failure. The goal was for her to be free of signs and symptoms of complications from tracheostomy. The interventions included, but were not limited to, administer treatments per medical provider's order, initiated 5/16/21, and to provide trach care and suctioning per order, initiated 5/16/21. During an interview on 11/2/23 at 10:20 a.m., RT…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving dialysis services had physician orders for dialysis services and monitoring of the site for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis. (Resident C) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 10/26/23 at 2:00 p.m. The diagnoses included but were not limited to: chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident C was cognitively intact. A care plan dated 10/6/23 indicated Resident C received dialysis services in the facility on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. The resident's access site was in her right chest. The resident's physician orders did not include dialysis orders or monitoring the resident's site. An interview was conducted with Resident C on 10/26/23 at 1:59 p.m. She indicated she received dialysis services in the facility on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. The resident's port was located on her left thigh. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately monitor, document, and track behaviors for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, 1 of 4 residents reviewed for dignity, and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse.(Resident 34, Resident F, and Resident 8). Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 10/31/23 at 10:18 a.m. Resident F's diagnoses included, but not limited to, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) affecting the right, dominant side, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, aphasia (difficulty with speaking), and anxiety disorder. A Psychiatry progress note dated 8/10/23 indicated, Resident F was seen for a follow-up visit for psychiatric medication management. He was taking Zoloft (anti-depressant) and melatonin (sleep aide). Resident F is frequently agitated and cursing at staff. Refuses po[sic, per os, by mouth] meds. Will start Risperadal Consta (an anti-psychotic medication). Resident F's presenting symptoms included, but not limited to, agitation, uncooperative with nursing care, delusions,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was provided clothing for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. (Resident 225) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 225 was reviewed on 10/26/23 at 2:30 p.m. The diagnoses included but were not limited to: major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and blindness. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 225 was cognitively intact. The resident was needing partial/moderate assistance with bathing and supervision that included verbal cues and touching assistance for personal hygiene and dressing. An ADL care for Resident 225 indicated the resident was needing assistance with ADL's due to blindness. The resident's inventory sheet dated 10/11/23 indicated Resident 225 does not have any clothes. An observation was made of Resident 225 on 10/26/23 at 2:24 p.m. The resident was observed wearing blue jeans and a black…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication carts did not contain expired medications along with loose pills located in 2 out of 4 medication carts observed. Findings include: An observation was conducted of [NAME] cart 3 with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 6 on 10/30/23 at 1:50 p.m. There was a vial of Humalog for Resident 43 with a use by date of 10/15/23. There was also a vial of Novolog for Resident 70 with a use by date of 10/17/23. The second drawer contained 9 loose pills in the center compartment and other loose pills in the right compartment of that same drawer. An observation was conducted of [NAME] cart 1 with Unit Manager 24 on 10/30/23 at 1:55 p.m. There were loose pills scattered in the second and third drawers of the medication cart. There was a packet that contained a 4 milligram tablet of Zofran (anti nausea medication) in the top drawer that didn't have a resident name, instructions, or date. A policy titled Storage of Medications, revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided milk as preferenced and failed to ensure a resident's preference for an alternative food item, which was on the always available menu, was always available for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for food. (Resident 225 and Resident 52) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 225 was reviewed on 10/26/23 at 2:30 p.m. The diagnoses included but were not limited to: major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and blindness. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 225 was cognitively intact. The resident was needing partial/moderate assistance with bathing and supervision that included verbal cues and touching assistance for personal hygiene and dressing. An ADL care for Resident 225 indicated the resident was needing assistance with ADL's due to blindness. An interview was conducted with Resident 225 on 10/31/23 at 10:00 a.m. He indicated he did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed prior to staff touching pills with their bare hands and ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was donned prior and during administration of a aerosol generating procedure (AGP) for 2 of 14 residents observed for medication administration. (Resident 100 and Resident 85) Findings include: 1. An observation was conducted of medication administration with Resident 100 by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5 on 10/30/23 at 1:00 p.m. LPN 5 proceeded to administer a nebulizer treatment to Resident 100 after she listened to their lung sounds along with obtaining a full set of vital signs. No PPE was donned prior to entering Resident 100's room before or during the administration of such nebulizer treatment. LPN 5 went to the nurses station to take a phone call while the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) entered the room to remove the nebulizer treatment mask from Resident 100 and obtained post treatment vital signs without donning PPE prior to entering Resident 100's room. 2. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of the resident's stay, a final summary of the resident's status, a reconciliation of all pre and post discharge medications, and a discharge plan of care for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. (Resident B, Resident F and Resident G) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 9/19/23 at 1:00 p.m. The diagnosis included but was not limited to: type 2 diabetes mellitus. A nursing note dated 6/30/23 indicated resident requested to be transferred to another long term care facility. A nursing progress note dated 7/6/23 indicated the resident discharged that day to another long term care facility. The resident was discharged with medications and personal items. 2. The clinical record for Resident G was reviewed on 9/19/23 at 1:15 p.m. The diagnosis included but was not limited to: tracheostomy. A nursing progress note dated 9/5/23 indicated Resident G was discharged to another long term care facility with medications. The clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure identified skin impairments were assessed after admission/readmission to the facility and ensure treatments were initiated timely after identification of skin impairments for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident C and Resident D) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 8/29/23 at 12:09 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, encephalopathy, tracheostomy status, stage 3 pressure ulcer, and gastrostomy status. A care plan for pressure ulcer, revised 6/21/23, indicated Resident C had impaired skin integrity related to right buttock wound. The interventions listed to administer treatments as ordered by the physician. A wound care provider note, dated 8/8/23, indicated a deep tissue injury (DTI) located to Resident C's left heel and a DTI located to the sacrum. Resident C was hospitalized from [DATE] to 8/18/23. A readmission assessment, dated 8/18/23, indicated an identified skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure gastrostomy (g-tube/feeding tube) feedings and flushes were consistent with physician orders for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for feeding tubes. (Resident C, Resident D, and Resident E) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 8/29/23 at 12:09 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, encephalopathy, tracheostomy status, gastrostomy (g-tube) status, and congestive heart failure. A care plan for nutrition, revised 4/3/23, indicated Resident C had a feeding tube and the intervention was listed to provide supplements per physician orders. A physician order, dated 8/24/23, was noted to flush feeding tube with 25 mL of water every hour. A physician order, dated 8/24/23, was noted for tube feeding at 70 mL every hour. An observation conducted on 8/29/23 at 1:18 p.m., of Resident C lying in bed and the g-tube was connected to the feeding pump. There was a container of feeding and a container with water present for water flushes to the g-tube. The feeding pump had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$56,381 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $56,381 — penalty dated 2023-11-03
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-05 for 2 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH 3 of 5Charleston Healthcare CenterCharleston, WV

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2013
EIGHTY SECOND MGT CO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2017
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2017
OMG IN MSTR LSCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2017
BOND, MARIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
CLARK, TIMOTHYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2015
DAUGHERTY, JOSHUAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
FELKER, DEANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2015
JOYNER, SARAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
LONG, STEVENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/19/2022
WILLARD, LACEYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022
WILSON, ROYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2015
CARROLL, PAULAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/19/2024
MUSTAKLEM, MARWANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
ODENTHAL, RICHARDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$5.1M
Related-party expense27% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 4%Other / private 18%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $5.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$435per resident / day
operating cost
$13,238per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$446per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155272. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next