No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Southwood Healthcare Center

2222 Margaret Ave, Terre Haute, IN 47802 · For profit - Corporation · 121 certified beds · (812) 232-2223 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$40,790 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $40,790 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-04)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 41% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2955 S 13th St · (812) 232-1488 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3020 S 7th St · (812) 232-9646 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3534 S Houseman St · (812) 232-5595 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2100 Grant St · (812) 232-2727 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.3%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.6%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.0%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.0%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.7%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.6%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.7%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.0%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.2%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table38.5%13.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine31.7%79.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.6%22.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.3%10.8%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.081.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.591.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
14.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.4%CMS range 35.5–62.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF14.0%CMS range 10.0–19.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.3%CMS range 5.2–14.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.181.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.31
RN hours/ resident / day
0.71
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
57.0%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 101.6 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-27)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-09)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect, when the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided adequate monitoring and care during the night shift for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for neglect (Resident B). The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE] when staff failed to visualize a resident during the 8-hour night shift and the resident was found deceased on the floor between the bed and wheelchair the next morning at 7:15 a.m. The Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Regional Director of Clinical Operations (RDCO), and a RDCO in training were notified of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 4:52 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on [DATE], but noncompliance remained at the lower scope and severity level of isolated, no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy. Findings include:Resident B's record was reviewed on [DATE] at 10:40 a.m. Census information indicated the resident was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing was provided to care for and supervise the residents that resided at the facility for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for sufficient staffing (Resident B). The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE] when the facility staff failed to provide care and supervision of residents residing at the facility during the eight hour night shift resulting in a resident not being checked on all night and was found deceased on [DATE] at 7:15 a.m. The Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Regional Director of Clinical Operations (RDCO), and a RDCO in training were notified of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 4:52 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on [DATE], but noncompliance remained at the lower scope and severity level of isolated, no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy. Findings include:Resident B's record was reviewed on [DATE] at 10:40 a.m. Census information indicated the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to arrange transportation to an acute care hospital for a scheduled stay prior to a surgical procedure, causing cancellation of the surgical procedure, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care and administration/personnel (Resident B).Findings include:During a telephone interview on 4/7/26 at 11:03 a.m., Resident B's resident representative indicated the resident had moved to the facility in December 2025. He had a surgical procedure scheduled to remove his bladder and divert his urinary function to be able to live without tubing exiting his back for urine drainage. In October of 2025, the surgery had been scheduled to be performed on 3/31/26. He was to be admitted to the acute care hospital on 3/29/26 to complete a neurology assessment prior to the surgery on 3/31/26. The hospital had called her on 3/29/26 at 3:40 p.m. and indicated Resident B's bed was ready for him to be transported. She asked them to call the facility so they could transport…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prepare a resident's food according to a physician's ordered modified diet for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for death (Resident B). This deficient practice was corrected by 2/20/26 prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Findings include:A clinical record review for Resident B was completed on 2/25/26 at 11:01 a.m. Diagnoses included dementia, oropharyngeal phase dysphagia (difficulty swallowing due to problems in the mouth and throat), and protein-calorie malnutrition. A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 1/19/26, indicated Resident B had severe cognitive impairment. She was rarely and/or never understood when expressing ideas or wants, and she could sometimes understand others. She required supervision and/or touching assistance for eating. A current physician's order, dated 10/30/25, indicated regular diet, dysphagia advanced texture, regular consistency. During an interview 2/25/26 at 1:36 p.m., CNA 1 indicated on 1/19/26 at approximately 12:00 p.m., the staff was passing the lunch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    A. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure paper towels at handwashing areas were maintained in a sanitary manner for 1 of 2 kitchen observations and 1 of 1 dining observation. B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was distributed in a safe and sanity manner and failed to ensure staff assisted residents with their meal in a safe and sanitary manner for 1 of 2 dining observations in the activity room (Residents 59, 1, 19, and 109). Findings include:A. During the initial kitchen observation, on 1/20/26 at 9:52 a.m., a commercial-sized roll of paper towel was sitting on a table next to the handwash sink. Visible wet marks were observed on the side and top of the paper towel roll. At the same time, the Culinary Director indicated the dispenser was out of towels and housekeeping had not been into the kitchen to refill the dispenser. The kitchen staff did not have the ability to load new towels into the dispenser; it had to be done by housekeeping. During an observation of the lunch meal service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure consent documents had been obtained for antipsychotics (medications used to manage symptoms of psychosis [a loss of contact with reality], such as delusions [a firmly held false belief that does not match reality], hallucinations [seeing or hearing things that are not there], insomnia [persistent difficulty falling asleep, staying asleep, or waking up too early], and severe agitation) medications for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 11, 59, and 62). Findings include:1. Resident 11's record was reviewed on 1/21/26 at 2:54 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, severe manic episode without psychotic symptoms (a week-long [or longer] period of extremely elevated, euphoric, or irritable mood and excessive energy that severely disrupts daily life) and unspecified psychosis (a diagnostic label for psychotic symptoms that don't fit a specific disorder). A significant change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were kept within residents' reach for 3 of 32 residents reviewed for call lights (Resident 19, 55, and 10).Findings include:1. During an observation, on 1/21/26 at 9:17 a.m., Resident 19 was lying in bed with a touch pad call light at the foot of the bed, next to the resident's feet. The call light was out of the resident's reach. During an observation, on 1/21/26 at 2:56 p.m., Resident19 was lying in bed, and the bed was next to the wall. The call light was stuck between the bed and the wall, out of the resident's reach. During an observation, on 1/22/26 at 2:11 p.m., Resident19 was lying in bed, and the bed was next to the wall. The call light was stuck between the bed and the wall, out of the resident's reach. Resident 19's record was reviewed on 1/23/26 at 2:00 p.m. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/25/25, indicated the resident had a severe cognitive impairment, required partial/moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate advance directives were ordered when the POST form was not the same as the physician order and care plan for 1 of 32 residents reviewed for advanced directives (Resident 15). Findings include:On [DATE] at 10:00 a.m., the medical record of Resident 15 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but was not limited to multiple myeloma (a cancer of plasma cells (a type of white blood cell) that grow out of control in the bone marrow), dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities) and diabetes, (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high). An admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired. A Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form (a legally recognized medical order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) (screening for serious mental illness and intellectual disability required before admission to a long term care facility) was updated when a psychiatric diagnosis was added to a resident's profile for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident 55). Findings include:Resident 55's record was reviewed on 1/23/26 at 9:46 a.m. Census information indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/12/25, indicated the resident was not considered by the state to have a Level II PASRR (an in-depth, mandatory federal evaluation for individuals suspected of having serious mental illness) with a serious mental illness. A Notice of PASRR Level I Screen Outcome, dated 4/10/24, indicated no Level II was required because the resident did not have a serious mental illness. The resident's profile indicated a diagnosis of bipolar II disorder (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess and initiate a care plan to support the use of elopement risk preventive measures for 1 of 23 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident 34). Findings include:On 1/21/26 at 10:33 a.m., during initial observation and interview, Resident 34 indicated he had an ankle bracelet alarm on his right ankle and did not understand why it was there. He indicated he had never been outside since he came to the facility and did not understand why he could not go outside. On 1/23/26 at 11:30 a.m., the medical record of Resident 34 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), and bipolar disorder (formerly called manic-depressive illness or manic depression a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood). A physician order, dated 10/3/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident was provided the necessary services to maintain grooming and daily care needs for 1 of 32 residents reviewed for daily care needs (Resident 12). Findings include:On 1/20/26 at 10:00 a.m., during an initial observation, observed Resident 12 lying in bed with excessive facial hair, dried pureed food on her shirt, oxygen tubing lying in the dried food, and hair was greasy and disheveled. On 1/21/26 at 10:15 a.m., the medical record of Resident 12 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, diabetes (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high), hypertension (high blood pressure), anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness) and osteomyelitis (a painful bone infection that causes inflammation and swelling in the bone) of the left foot. The medical record lacked supporting documentation of respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe smoking protocols were followed for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident 9). Findings include:During an interview, on 1/21/26 at 9:38 a.m., Resident 9 indicated she smoked one or two cigarettes at a time when she went outside. Resident 9 indicated she was able to go out and smoke whenever she liked and was allowed to keep her own cigarettes and lighter in her room. The resident indicated the facility had not provided her with anything to lock her cigarettes and lighter inside, and she kept them in her purse. The resident indicated she had a history of seizures. During a continuous observation, on 1/22/26 from 2:32 p.m. to 2:40 p.m., the following was observed. Resident 9 exited her room pushing her wheelchair down the hallway, proceeded down two hallways towards the smoking exit door, exited the building, removed cigarettes and lighter from her purse, lit a cigarette and smoked. The cigarettes and lighter were kept…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that nebulizer equipment was properly cleaned and stored after each use for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen and nebulizer use (Residents 12 and 63). Findings include:1. On 1/21/26 at 9:57 a.m., during an initial observation, Resident 12 was lying in bed. She indicated she had received a nebulizer treatment. A nebulizer is (an electrically powered machine that turns liquid medication into a mist so that it can be breathed directly into the lungs through a face mask or mouthpiece). The nebulizer tubing and mask were lying on the bedside nightstand on top of a clear plastic bag dated 1/19/26. The medication chamber was observed to have clear liquid inside. On 1/21/26 at 10:15 a.m., the medical record of Resident 12 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, diabetes (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided routine dental services for 1 of 32 residents reviewed for dental services (Resident 9). Findings include:During an interview, on 1/21/26 at 9:31 a.m., Resident 9 indicated she wanted to see a dentist, but she did not think dental services had been offered to her since she was admitted to the facility. The resident indicated she had missing teeth and teeth that had fallen out that she wanted checked. Resident 9's record was reviewed on 1/22/26 at 1:33 p.m. Census information indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/19/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A care plan, last revised on 5/21/25, indicated the resident had the potential for oral/dental problems due to carious (cavities or tooth decay) teeth. Interventions included, but were not limited to, dental consult as needed. The resident's electronic record lacked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide family notification after a resident experienced a significant change in condition and subsequently received life-sustaining interventions to include a ventilator without notification to the emergency contact, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident B). Findings include, A confidential interview during the survey indicated Resident B's emergency contact was not notified when the resident was transferred from the facility on [DATE]. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on [DATE] at 10:47 a.m. Diagnoses on Resident B's profile included personal history of transient cerebral ischemic attack (TIA-stroke), and seizure disorder. A physician's order, dated [DATE], indicated send the resident to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. An eINTERACT SBAR Summary for Providers, dated [DATE] at 5:30 a.m., indicated the resident had a fall and was unresponsive. Resident B was found on floor in the bathroom, assessed, transferred…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation of abuse allegations was conducted and a record of the investigation was maintained for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Residents H, G, and F). Findings include:1. An Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) reportable incident investigation file was reviewed on 9/3/25 at 2:31 p.m. The file included an IDOH incident report dated 6/14/25. The report indicated Residents H and G had an altercation in the dining room. Resident H pushed Resident G's wheelchair across the dining room. There was no physical touch or harm. The staff immediately separated the residents, and an investigation was initiated. The report indicated the investigation would include resident statements. The incident file included two statements from staff members who witnessed the incident and three days of psychosocial follow-up for Residents H and G. The incident file lacked documentation of resident statements, including interviews to determine if other residents had experienced negative interactions with Resident H.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to accurately document wound description upon admission to the facility for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds (Resident B), and failed to ensure medications were documented according to physician orders for administration of insulin for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident D). Findings include: 1. On 9/3/25 at 11:00 a.m., the medical record of Resident B was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. admission diagnosis included but were not limited to paraplegia (paralysis that occurs in the lower half of the body), and type 2 diabetes (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high). A physician order, dated 8/11/25, indicated to administer Medi honey Wound/Burn Dressing External Gel to coccyx wound topically every dayshift for pressure ulcer care cover with ABD pad and secure. A physician order, dated 8/10/25, indicated administer Miconazole Nitrate 2 % Cream to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered and documented according to physician orders for administration of insulin for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration (Residents, D, F, B, and E). Findings include: 1. On 4/9/25 at 10:00 a.m., during an initial observation and interview of Residents D and E. The residents indicated they had received their insulin. They were not sure of times of administration and indicated it was administered at breakfast. On 4/9/25 at 1:40 p.m., observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 7, at the medication administration cart. The LPN indicated she was not usually late administering insulin. On 4/9/25 at 1:05 p.m. during interview with Resident D. She indicated she received her insulin around 12:30 p.m., She indicated she did not eat breakfast that a.m. but she did receive insulin. She did not know what time it was administered. She indicated she usually got her insulin before she ate but it did vary.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were followed during a dressing change for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident G). Findings include: During a continuous observation, on 4/10/25 from 9:56 a.m. to 10:16 a.m., the following was observed. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 7 performed hand hygiene, donned gloves and a gown, and completed the dressing change to Resident G's sacrum (bone at the base of the spine). Near the end of the sacrum dressing change, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 11 entered the room to assist LPN 7. CNA 11 did not perform hand hygiene after entering the room. CNA 11 donned gloves but did not put on a gown. CNA 11 held up Resident G's left heel so LPN 7 could complete the dressing change to that area. CNA 11 removed the dressing from Resident G's left heel and continued to hold up the resident's leg. CNA 11 did not perform hand hygiene or change gloves after she removed the resident's dressing. On 4/10/25 at 10:16 a.m., the continuous observation was completed. At the same…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate nurse staffing for 5 of 6 units schedules reviewed (units 100, 200 A, 200 B, 400, and 500). Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 12/31/24 at 9:25 a.m., Resident K indicated there were sometimes when she had not been given her insulin. She understood that the nurses were human and were really busy, but she was a Registered Nurse in her career and knows that insulin needs to be given as ordered. She would never refuse any of her insulin, it was too important for her to have it. Resident K's record was reviewed on 12/31/24 at 8:29 a.m. The profile indicated the resident resided on the 400 unit of the facility. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic disease that occurs when the body doesn't produce enough insulin [a hormone that regulates blood sugar levels] or doesn't use it properly, resulting in high blood sugar levels) with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/28/24, indicated the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure inulin medications were administered as ordered for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for insulin medications (Residents F, K, and H). Findings include: 1. Resident F's record was reviewed on 12/30/24 at 1:10 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, systemic lupus erythematosus (an illness that occurs when the immune system attacks healthy tissue and organs) and diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/8/24 indicated the resident was cognitively intact and was on insulin medication. A care plan, dated 10/7/20, indicated the resident had diabetes mellitus and had potential for complications. Interventions included, but were not limited to, diabetes medication as ordered by doctor and educate regarding medications and importance of compliance. a. A physician order, dated 4/6/24, indicated to administer Fiasp…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper handwashing during 2 of 2 dining observations and 1 of 1 kitchen observations and the facility failed to ensure adequate dishwashing temperatures were maintained for 1 of 1 kitchen observations. Findings include: 1a. During a dining observation, on 12/2/24 at 11:59 a.m., Central Supply Aide washed her hands at the sink and tore off a piece of paper towel by unraveling it from a commercial size roll that was on the counter. She left drops of water on the top of the paper towel roll from where she ripped it off with her wet hands. She dried her hands and proceeded to turn off the water faucet with the same paper towel she dried her hands with. She then went to the kitchen window and obtained a tray to serve to a resident. During a dining observation, on 12/2/24 at 12:01 p.m., Certified Nurse's Assistant (CNA) 35 washed her hands at the sink and tore off a piece of paper towel by unraveling it from a commercial size roll that was on the counter. She obtained the paper towel with wet hands and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the code status (a medical term that indicates a patient's wishes regarding what life-saving measures should be taken if their heart stops beating or breathing stops) was documented and readily available to staff for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for advanced directives ( a written document that tells the health care providers who should speak for a resident and what medical decisions they should make if the resident becomes unable to speak for themselves) (Resident 152). Findings include: Resident 152's record was reviewed on 12/3/24 at 9:51 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, atherosclerotic heart disease of the native coronary artery (a condition where plaque [a buildup of cholesterol, fat, blood cells, and other substances in the walls of the heart arteries] builds up in the coronary arteries, cardiomegaly (enlarged heart), and history of myocardial infarction (heart attack). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/18/24, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure notification of a resident discharge had been reported to the Ombudsman (a person who investigates and resolves complaints and represents or protects the interests of another person or group) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident 6). Findings include: Resident 6's record was reviewed on 12/3/24 at 3:47 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (hemiplegia refers to a severe or complete loss of strength, whereas hemiparesis refers to a relatively mild loss of strength) following a cerebral infarction (stroke), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a common lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), and congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition where the heart is unable to pump enough blood to the body's tissues). A change of condition assessment, dated 10/1/24, indicated the resident complained of new or worsening abdominal pain, shortness of breath, and had abnormal vital signs. A transfer document, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments were completed timely for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for MDS records over 120 days old (Residents 42 and 2). Findings include: 1. On 12/4/24 at 9:32 a.m., Resident 42's record was reviewed. She was discharged on 8/10/24, and the record indicated her return was not anticipated. The record lacked documentation of a discharge MDS assessment being completed. On 12/9/24 at 2:13 p.m., Resident 42's record indicated that a discharge MDS assessment had been signed and completed on 12/9/24 with an export ready status. During an interview on 12/9/24 at 2:33 p.m., Employee 19 indicated they did an audit every few months and so did the corporate office. She was not aware they had missed completing the discharge MDS assessment in a timely manner for Resident 42 until 12/9/24 when the corporate office called and let her know. The corporate office maintained an audit log, but she did not, she would just go through and check things. 2. On 12/9/24 at 2:23 p.m., Resident 2's record was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain and implement treatment orders upon admission for a stage 4 pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss with exposed muscle and/or bone) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident K). Findings include: On 12/9/24 at 11:00 a.m., the medical record of Resident K was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Admitting diagnosis included but not limited to, paraplegia (paralysis that occurs in the lower half of the body), osteomyelitis (an inflammation or swelling that occurs in the bone), enterocolitis (inflammation of the colon) to clostridium (bacterial infection in the colon), and pressure ulcer (bed sore) sacral (tail bone) region stage 4 (full thickness ulcer with the involvement of the muscle or bone). A Physician order, dated 10/28/24, indicated the following wound treatment was to be applied on day shift every Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and as needed. Staff were to cleanse the wound on the sacrum with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient weekend staffing for 1 of 4 fiscal year quarters reported for sufficient and competent nurse staffing (4/1/24-6/30/24). Findings include: On 12/2/24 at 11:00 a.m., the staffing data report was reviewed. The facility had reported low weekend staffing for the third fiscal year quarter (4/1/24-6/30/24). During an interview on 12/4/24 at 1:43 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 13 indicated staff did not have enough time to complete their daily assignments, they needed more staff, and the biggest problem at the facility was with retaining staff. The facility asked her to stay late or work overtime nearly every day, but she declined because she wanted to avoid burnout. During an interview on 12/4/24 at 2:42 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 15 indicated the facility did not have enough staff to do everything that needed to be done, and the staff they did have struggled to get things done. Each CNA had up to 2 halls on day and evening shifts, and on weekend shifts they were staffed even…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff was competent in completing tasks accurately for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration (Residents 51 and M). Findings include: 1a. During the medication administration observation, on 12/6/24 at 7:50 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 23 obtained a glucometer machine from the top of her medication cart and wiped it with an alcohol pad from front to back, she then placed it back down on the medication cart, she grabbed a lancet (medical tool for drawing blood and a cutting instrument used in surgery), test strip (a small disposable plastic strip that measures blood sugar levels), and a alcohol pad and proceeded into Resident 51's room. Upon entering the resident's room, she set the glucometer machine on the bedside table without a barrier underneath. The nurse put on gloves. She attempted to use the glucometer machine but had an error message and was unable to use it. She exited the resident's room and obtained a second glucometer machine from a different medication cart and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the correct supporting diagnosis was used to prescribe an antipsychotic for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 1), and failed to attempt a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) or provide evidence to support the denial of a GDR for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 48). Findings include: 1. On 12/5/24 at 9:02 a.m., Resident 1's record was reviewed for unnecessary medications. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, major depressive disorder (a mental health condition that can cause persistent low mood and loss of interest in activities), psychotic disorder with delusions (serious mental illness where people lose touch with reality and have abnormal thinking, and have false beliefs), agoraphobia (fear of being in places that may be difficult to escape or help would not be available) with panic disorder (anxiety that causes repeated unexpected panic attacks). On 12/5/24 at 9:36 a.m., Resident 1's pharmacy recommendations were reviewed. A pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was labeled properly for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage (Resident 51). Findings include: On 12/6/24 at 8:13 a.m., the 200 B hall (front) medication cart contained an undated and opened Novolog (medication used to lower blood sugar) insulin pen. The insulin pen contained a label that indicated it was for Resident 51 and was delivered to the facility on 9/11/24. During an interview, on 12/6/24 at 8:14 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 23 indicated insulin was good for 30 days once opened and she was not aware of how long the Novolog pen for Resident 51 had been opened. During an interview, on 12/6/24 at 8:16 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 indicated insulin pens should have an open date placed on them when they are used. LPN 3 indicated insulin was good for 28 days once opened. Resident 51's record was reviewed on 12/6/24 at 9:00 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper handling of the glucometer (small portable machine that's used to measure how much glucose [type of sugar] is in the blood) meter during medication administration pass for 1 of 4 residents reviewed during medication administration (Resident 51) and the facility failed to maintain a separation of clean and dirty mechanical lift pads and mop heads supplies in the laundry room for 1 of 1 laundry room observations. Findings include: 1. During the medication administration observation, on 12/6/24 at 7:50 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 23 obtained a glucometer machine from the top of her medication cart and wiped it with an alcohol pad from front to back, she then placed it back down on the medication cart, she grabbed a lancet (medical tool for drawing blood and a cutting instrument used in surgery), test strip (a small disposable plastic strip that measures blood sugar levels), and a alcohol pad and proceeded into Resident 51's room. Upon entering the resident's room, she set the glucometer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to supervise, monitor, and initiate interventions for a dementia resident with a known history of intrusive wandering behaviors, Resident B, which resulted in her being hit by another resident, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Residents B and C). Findings include: An Indiana State Department of Health (ISDH) Survey System report, dated 5/27/24 at 9:40 a.m., submitted by the facility indicated Resident B went into Resident C's room. Resident C made contact with Resident B's right side of her face. Resident B sustained a reddened area on her right temple measuring 2 centimeters (cm) by 3 cm. Resident B was one-on-one observation with staff at the time of the incident and staff had tried to redirect the resident. Resident C was trying to get Resident B out of his personal space with no intent to harm. Resident B was transferred to an inpatient psychiatric facility. The physician, the police department, and responsible parties were notified of the incident. On 6/3/24 at 10:21 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system for the reconciliation of narcotic medications resulting in two separate occasions of drug diversion for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication reconciliation (Resident C). Findings include: 1. An Indiana State Department of Health (ISDH) Survey System report, dated 4/22/24 at 1:30 a.m., submitted by the facility indicated one card of Resident C's Norco (narcotic medication used to relieve moderate to severe pain) was missing. Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 6 and Registered Nurse (RN) 5 were suspended pending investigation. The pharmacy and Police Department were notified of the missing narcotic medication. On 5/14/24 at 9:32 a.m., the Administrator (ADM) indicated the facility could not prove who took the missing narcotic medication card of Norco. On 5/14/24 at 11:55 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated she did part of the investigation of the missing narcotic card and the Corporate Registered Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred to a doctor's appointment in a dignified manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity concerns (Resident B). Finding includes: A confidential interview, during the survey, indicated Resident B was brought to the urology office for a scheduled appointment on 3/21/24 at 11:15 a.m. The resident was transported to the office from a local long term care facility by an ambulance service. He was brought in by stretcher wrapped in only a sheet covered in feces (poop), underneath the sheet he was wearing only an adult diaper. His catheter was falling out of his urethra (the tube that lets urine leave your bladder and your body). His colostomy bag (collection of poop) was full and leaking feces all over his body. His skin was red and excoriated (a place where your skin is scraped or abraded) by his stoma (an opening on the abdomen that can be connected to either your digestive or urinary system to allow waste to be diverted out of your body) and his back. On 4/2/24 at 11:45 a.m., Resident B's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurately documented for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for intravenous medication administration (Resident D). Findings include: On 4/2/24 at 11:35 a.m. Resident D's record was reviewed. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain. It is caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood), acute kidney failure (kidneys suddenly stopped working properly), presence of cardiac pacemaker (a device used to control an irregular heart rhythm implanted into the heart), type 2 diabetes (blood sugar disorder), atrial fibrillation (heart rate irregularity), bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the bloodstream), bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (damage either to the tiny hair cells in your inner ear or to the nerve pathways that lead from your inner ear to the brain causing hearing loss), and congestive heart failure (the heart's capacity to pump blood cannot keep up with the body's need). A physician order, dated 1/29/24, indicated to administer cefazolin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents received care and services related to skin impairment (Resident D). Findings include: During an interview on [DATE] at 1:37 p.m., Resident D indicated she had gaulding (chafing or irritation) to abdominal folds. She asked the staff to clean her and apply medication. She asked the Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) to tell the nurse she needed to have treatment applied and they did not do it. She asked for pain medication yesterday and had to wait for a long time to get it. She called several times to ask for medicine and had to wait for 2.5 hours to get her pain medication. She had no nystatin powder. It happened a lot and she did not understand why she was out when they did not use it very much. The resident indicated the treatment to abdominal folds had not been administered for several days. The resident indicated she had been seen by the Nurse Practitioner on [DATE] and was given an order for Diflucan due to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement a system to monitor and reconcile narcotic medications for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medications, and failed to ensure medications were available and administered in accordance with physician orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed medications (Resident D). Findings include: 1. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:37 p.m., Resident D indicated, she asked for pain medication on [DATE] around 10:00 a.m. and had to wait for a long time to get it. She called several times to ask for medications and had to wait for 2.5 hours to receive pain medication. On [DATE] at 3:30 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 and LPN 4, indicated, if they did not have a medication, they got it out of the emergency drug kit (EDK). If not available in the EDK, they call the pharmacy and order the medication. On [DATE] at 3:45 pm during interview with the DON. The DON indicated if medication was not available the nurse would obtain the medications from the EDK, if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had safe smoking materials provided for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accidents (Resident 65), failed initiate fall follow-up protocols for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accidents (Resident 25), and failed to ensure safe medication storage for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents (Residents 39 and 254). Findings include: 1. On 10/03/23 at 10:51 a.m., while observing Resident 65, in the designated smoking area. The resident dropped ashes several times on her lap blanket. She indicated she had never had a smoking blanket or apron to wear when smoking and she was unable to feel sensation below her waist due to an auto accident resulting in injury to her spine. The Maintenance Technician provided one to one supervision for Resident 65 and indicated smoking blankets or aprons were not provided for the residents. Resident 154 indicated smoking blankets or apron were not available for her to use. Observation of the smoking area lacked evidence of a smoking apron or smoking blanket. On 10/5/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired insulin medications were disposed of properly for 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage (Residents 57 and 79) and the facility failed to ensure insulin medication was labeled properly for 1 of 3 medications carts reviewed for medication storage (Resident 97). The facility failed to ensure proper storage of insulin medication for 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage (Residents 57 and 88). Findings include: 1. On 10/5/23 at 9:05 a.m., the 100-hall medication cart contained 2 insulin pens (an injection device with a needle that delivers insulin into the subcutaneous [under the skin] tissue) that were expired. The pens were labeled for Residents 57 and 79. Resident 57's insulin pen had an open date of 8/24/23 and Resident 79's insulin pen had an open date of 8/30/23. During an interview, on 10/5/23 at 9:10 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4 indicated the insulin pens were good for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the cleanliness and sanitation of the kitchen and food preparation and storage areas for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. Findings include: 1. During the initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager (DM), on 10/2/23 at 10:20 a.m., the following was observed: a. The flooring in the dry storage room was sticky when walked upon and observed with a heavy soilage buildup and dingy with dried food particles, fresh food items, and small pieces of paper debris, including salt/pepper packets, jelly packets, bread ties, and paper towel pieces. b. The light cover above the stove and ovens was soiled with a heavy buildup of dust debris and grease. c. The stove hood filter vent was soiled with a heavy buildup of dust debris and grease. d. The conventional oven and the convection oven were soiled with burnt food debris. e. The steamer had a heavy lime buildup and soiled with burnt food debris. f. The sanitizer bucket water appeared used and soiled. The DM tested the sanitizer solution with a test strip and indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided showers as preferred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for choices (Resident 25). Finding includes: During an interview, on 10/3/23 at 8:58 a.m., Resident 25 indicated she had requested to receive two showers a week but there were times she would go a whole week without a shower. Resident 25's record was reviewed on 10/6/23 at 9:34 a.m. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/16/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required a one-person physical assist with bathing. A care plan, dated 10/28/21 and revised on 2/24/23, indicated the resident had self-care performance deficit, required assistance with ADL (activities of daily living) related to shortness of breath and weakness. Intervention included, but were not limited to, resident preferred to take a shower during evening shift on Tuesday and Friday. Review of resident council minutes, dated 8/8/23, indicated the residents had concerns about not receiving their showers per residents' preferences. Review of point of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of missing money was reported and handled as an allegation of misappropriation, and failed to report the allegation to the Indiana Department of Health completed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for missing personal property (Resident 39). Findings include: On 10/03/23 10:19 a.m., Resident 39 indicated her monthly facility payment went missing 6/25/23, in the amount of $837.00 cash. On 10/05/23 at 12:23 p.m., Resident 39 indicated when the money went missing, before she went to dialysis 6/26/23. She told an unknown male Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) and CNA 15 she believed it was another unknown CNA, who had dirty-blonde hair in a bun, that took the money. She indicated a police report was not filed, and she was not sure if anything else had been done. Record review completed on 10/04/23 at 2:03 p.m., indicated Resident 39's record lacked documentation of an investigation or outcomes. In an interview on 10/05/23 at 2:25 p.m., the Social Service Director (SSD) indicated that she had known about Resident 39's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, document, and conduct a thorough investigation after a resident alleged missing money for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for resident property (Resident 39). Findings include: On 10/03/23 10:19 a.m., Resident 39 indicated her monthly facility payment went missing 6/25/23, in the amount of $837.00 cash. On 10/05/23 at 12:23 p.m., Resident 39 indicated before she went to dialysis on 6/26/23, she told an unknown male Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) and CNA 15 that she believed another unknown CNA, with dirty-blonde hair in a bun, took the money. She indicated a police report was not filed, and she was not sure if anything else had been done. A record review, completed on 10/04/23 at 2:03 p.m., indicated Resident 39's record lacked documentation of an investigation or outcomes. In an interview on 10/05/23 at 2:25 p.m., the Social Service Director (SSD) indicated that she had known about Resident 39's missing money from the business office because the resident could not pay her bill. SSD did not have any record of an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised for 2 of 24 residents reviewed for care plans (Residents, 98 and 65). Findings Include: 1. On 10/03/23 at 10:51 a.m., while observing Resident 65, in the designated smoking area. The resident dropped ashes several times on her lap blanket. She indicated she had never had a smoking blanket or apron to wear when smoking and she was unable to feel sensation below her waist due to an auto accident resulting in injury to her spine. The Maintenance Technician provided one to one supervision for Resident 65 and indicated smoking blankets or aprons were not provided for the residents. Resident 154 indicated smoking blankets or apron were not available for her to use. Observation of the smoking area lacked evidence of a smoking apron or smoking blanket. On 10/5/23 at 11:15 a.m., during an interview the Regional Nurse Consultant indicated if a resident wanted to smoke, they were assessed for safe smoking and if they dropped ashes on themselves, they were to be wearing a smoking apron. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided to a dependent resident for 1 of 32 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) (Resident 13). Finding includes: On 10/3/23 at 10:34 a.m., Resident 13 was observed lying in bed with long, untrimmed fingernails with dark debris underneath the fingernails on bilateral (both) hands. On 10/4/23 at 2:01 p.m., Resident 13 was observed lying in bed with long, untrimmed fingernails with dark debris underneath the fingernails on both hands, while lying in bed watching television. On 10/5/23 at 9:05 a.m., Resident 13 was observed lying in bed with long, untrimmed fingernails with dark debris underneath the fingernails on both hands, while lying in bed watching television. On 10/5/23 at 9:00 a.m., Resident 13 was observed lying in bed with long, untrimmed fingernails with dark debris underneath the fingernails on both hands, while lying in bed watching television. Resident 13's record was reviewed, on 10/4/23 at 2:12 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a hand splint intervention was provided for a resident with a hand contracture (fixed tightening of muscle, tendons, ligaments, or skin) and a compression sleeve intervention was provided for the resident with edema (swelling caused by too much fluid trapped in the body's tissues) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for limitation in range of motion (ROM) (Resident 13). Findings include: On 10/3/23 at 10:34 a.m., Resident 13 was observed lying in bed with a contracted right hand. The right hand had long, untrimmed fingernails and was in a tightly closed fist. No compression sleeve nor a hand splint device were observed on the resident. On 10/4/23 at 2:01 p.m., Resident 13 was observed lying in bed with a contracted right hand. The right hand had long, untrimmed fingernails and was in a tightly closed fist. No compression sleeve nor a hand splint device were observed on the resident. On 10/5/23 at 9:00 a.m., Resident 13 was observed lying in bed with a contracted right hand. The right hand had long, untrimmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of respiratory equipment for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents 25 and 254). Findings Include: 1. On 10/3/23 at 9:04 a.m., Resident 25's unbagged nebulizer (turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled) mouthpiece and tubing was observed hanging off the nebulizer machine. The resident was resting in bed. On 10/4/23 at 9:45 a.m., Resident 25 was asleep in bed and her unbagged nebulizer mouthpiece and tubing were observed hanging down the side of her bedside table almost touching the floor. On 10/5/23 at 10:03 a.m., Resident 25 was sitting up in her wheelchair and her unbagged nebulizer mouthpiece and tubing was observed sitting on top of her nebulizer machine. A clear substance was noted to be in the medication chamber of the mouthpiece. On 10/5/23 at 2:55 p.m., Resident 25's unbagged nebulizer mouthpiece and tubing were observed to be sitting on top of her nebulizer machine and a clear substance was noted to be in the medication chamber of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure documented evidence of medication administration for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 33 and 60). Findings include: 1. Resident 33's record was reviewed on 10/4/23 at 1:50 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hyperlipidemia (an excess of lipids [fats] in the blood), manic episodes (a state of mind characterized by high energy, excitement, and euphoria over a sustained period of time), anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities) and major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents), dated 8/20/23, indicated the resident had severe cognitive deficit and received antipsychotic medication (a type of psychiatric medication which are available on prescription to treat psychosis) and antidepressant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure documented evidence of physician treatment orders being completed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nursing services (Resident B). Finding includes: During an initial observation, on 8/26/23 at 7:30 p.m., Resident B was observed in her bed watching television (TV). She was positioned on her back, facing right, with a positioning pillow under her left side. No pillow support was observed under the resident's heels or between bony prominence's (areas which are under the most pressure and are at greatest risk for developing pressure sores). During a random observation, on 8/28/23 at 9:50 a.m., Resident B was observed in her bed. The resident had a positioning pillow on her left side, but her body was not in contact with the pillow. The resident was positioned on her back. No pillow support for her heels or in between her bony prominence's were observed. During a random observation, on 8/28/23 at 12:05 p.m., Resident B was observed in her bed positioned on her back with the head of her bed elevated, eating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$40,790 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $40,790 — penalty dated 2025-09-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.2-2.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH 3 of 5Charleston Healthcare CenterCharleston, WV

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2014
BOND, MARIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
CLARK, TIMOTHYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2015
DAUGHERTY, JOSHUAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
FELKER, DEANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2014
JOYNER, SARAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
LONG, STEVENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/13/2022
WILLARD, LACEYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022
WILSON, ROYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2015
MARGARET MGT CO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2017
ABDAYEM, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/06/2025
LINDER, MOLLYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/26/2024
ODENTHAL, RICHARDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2017
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2017
OMG IN MSTR LSCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/06/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$5.9M
Related-party expense41% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 3%Other / private 15%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $5.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 41% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$388per resident / day
operating cost
$11,803per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$402per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155484. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next