Cedars Healthcare Center
1242 Cedars Ct, Charlottesville, VA 22903 · For profit - Corporation · 141 certified beds · (434) 296-5611 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.4% | 14.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.3% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 1.6% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.9% | 18.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 3.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.8% | 15.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.3% | 20.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.7% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.8% | 4.7% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.4% | 21.8% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.3% | 14.2% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.6% | 1.3% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 34.5% | 73.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.5% | 22.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.1% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.51 | 1.52 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.37 | 1.48 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 6.7–16.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 6.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.10 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 141 beds and averages 126.4 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice with regards to medication administration for three residents (Resident #2- R2, Resident #4-R4, and Resident #5 -R5), in a survey sample of six residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #2, the facility staff failed to administer medications timely. On 2/26/25 at 11:25 a.m., an interview was conducted with R2 in her room. R2 reported, I haven't gotten my morning medications yet. When asked what time they are scheduled, R2 reported, 8 a.m. When asked how often this happens, R2 said, A lot. When asked if she knows why, R2 said, No, I don't know why. The resident stated that she has told the head nurse and nurses, but it doesn't get any better. On 2/26/25, a clinical record review was conducted. According to R2's physician orders and medication administration record, four medications, including propanolol for hypertension and carbidopa-levodopa for Parkinson's, were scheduled at 7 a.m., gabapentin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for one resident (Resident #2- R2) in the survey sample of six residents. The findings include: For R2, the facility staff failed to accurately transcribe a physician order, resulting in multiple occurrences of medications being administered at the wrong dose. On 2/26/25 at 11:25 a.m., R2 was visited in her room. When asked about medications, R2 reported she had difficulty getting her medications timely. On 2/26/25 and 2/27/25, a clinical record review was conducted of R2's chart. According to a progress note dated 2/10/25, from a neurologist that R2 saw that day, the note read in part, . Assessment/Plan: . Her exam is most notable for mild symmetric bradykinesia, minimal rigidity, and a prominent postural/action tremor that attenuates at rest . I am inclined to agree that this is likely drug-induced tremor; unfortunately, she is unable to reduce/stop VPA [valproic acid]. Since the postural/action component is most bothersome, we will restart propranolol at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for four residents (Resident #4-R4, Resident #5-R5, Resident #1-R1, and Resident #20-R20) in a survey sample of 6 residents. The findings included: 1. For R1, the facility staff failed to have Gabapentin available for administration in accordance with physician orders. On 2/26/25 at 11:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with R1. During the interview, R1 said, This is my 3rd day without gabapentin. I think it has to do with agency nurses. They are just lazy and don't do like they should. According to the physician orders, it was noted that R1 had an order for Gabapentin Capsule 400 mg, give 2 capsules by mouth every 8 hours for neuropathy. On 2/25/25, it was documented that the order was put on hold. According to the medication administration record, R1 did not receive two doses of the scheduled Gabapentin on 2/24/25 and did not recieve any of the three doses on 2/25/25. The medication order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen, having the potential to affect multiple residents on 4 of 4 nursing units. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to let dishes air dry and were stacking dishes wet or wet nesting, which can cause bacteria growth. On 11/19/24, during the lunch meal, observations were conducted in the dining room of the meal service. The dietary aide (Other Employee #17) was at the tray line plating food without wearing a beard guard, although facial hair was visible. On 11/20/24 at 1:40 p.m., during a follow-up visit to the kitchen, the cook (Other Employee #14) was observed in the area by the stove, preparing food without wearing a hair net. The dietary aide (Other Employee #15) was observed preparing beverages and her hair net was only covering the ends of her hair in the back. When asked about hair nets, Other Employee #15 stated that they don't have any large enough to cover her hair and that she usually has to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy with regards to the pre-screening of employees for 24 employees in a survey sample of 26 employee records reviewed. The findings included: On 11/19/24, a random sample of 26 employees was selected for review of evidence of pre-screening in accordance with state licensure survey activity and compliance with the facility's abuse policy. On 11/21/24, a meeting was held with the human resources director to review the sampled employees' files, and the following was noted: 1. For fourteen employees, the facility staff obtained a criminal background check from the Virginia State Police, beyond 30 days from hire. For Staff #1, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #13, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, and #22, the facility staff obtained a criminal background check from the Virginia State Police on 10/8/24 and 10/9/24, following an audit of employee files. Some of the employees were hired as much as 1 year and 8 months prior to the criminal background being obtained. On 11/21/24 at approximately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for seven of thirty residents in the survey sample (Residents #20, #40, #70, #77, #80, #93 and #323). The findings include: 1. Resident #20 was not administered the medication methadone as ordered by the physician. According to the clinical record, Resident #20 (R20) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, neuropathy, congestive heart failure, hypertension, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R20 as cognitively intact. R20's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 11/1/24 for methadone 10 milligrams with instructions to give one tablet twice per day for pain management. R20's medication administration record documented the methadone was not administered as ordered on 11/15/24, 11/16/24, and 11/17/24 (morning dose). Nursing notes on 11/15/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for six residents (Resident #80-R80, Resident #69-R69, Resident #70-R70, Resident #20-R20, Resident #40-R40, and Resident #93-R93) in a survey sample of 30 residents. The facility staff also failed to ensure medications were available during medication administration on two units (200 unit and 400 unit) out of four units. The findings included: 1. For R69, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration as ordered by the physician for pain control. On 11/20/24 at 9:30 a.m., during an interview with R69, the resident reported she had a fall and broke her right foot. R69 was observed to have a cast on her right lower leg. R69 reported that she had several occurrences of running out of her pain medication oxycodone. On 11/20/24, a clinical record review was conducted. According to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility failed to properly store medications on two of four units (200-unit, 300-unit). The findings include: On the 200-unit and 300-unit, it was observed that unopened insulin and eye drops were stored at room temperature when refrigeration was required. In the medication refrigerator on the 300-unit, the controlled medication lorazepam was not stored in a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment. On 11/20/24 at 1:57 p.m., accompanied by the licensed practical nurse unit manager (LPN #3), a 300-unit medication cart was inspected. Stored in the cart at room temperature was an unopened vial of Humalog insulin for a current resident. The label on the insulin directed to refrigerate until opened. On 11/20/24 at 2:05 p.m., accompanied by LPN #3, the medication room on the 300-unit was inspected. Stored in the medication refrigerator was a 30 ml (milliliter) bottle of liquid lorazepam. The lorazepam was stored along with other medications in a tray on the refrigerator shelf. There was no separate,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen and in the dining room. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to wear hair restraints (hair nets and beard guards) while preparing and distributing food, to prevent the contamination of food items. On 11/19/24, during lunch, meal service observations were conducted in the dining room. The dietary aide (Other Employee #17) was observed at the tray line, plating food without wearing a beard guard and visible facial hair. On 11/20/24 at 1:40 p.m., during a follow-up visit to the kitchen, the cook (Other Employee #14) was observed by the stove, preparing food without wearing a hair net. The dietary aide (Other Employee #15) was observed preparing beverages, with her hair net was only covering the ends of her hair in the back. When asked about hair nets, Other Employee #15 stated that they don't have any large enough to cover her hair and that she usually has to wear two. The food services district…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to educate about and offer pneumococcal immunizations according to the facility's infection control policy for three of five residents reviewed (Residents #20, #93, and #94). The pneumococcal immunization status was not documented and/or up to date in the clinical record for five of five residents reviewed (Residents #20, #53, #84, #93, and #94). The findings include: On 11/21/24 at 11:45 a.m., accompanied by the regional infection preventionist (RN #2), five residents were reviewed for immunizations, as part of the infection control survey task. Clinical records for Residents #20, #93 and #94 documented no education or offering of the pneumococcal vaccine and their records documented no status/history of pneumococcal immunizations. Resident #84's clinical record did not include the resident's pneumococcal immunization status. Resident #53's record documented the administration of pneumococcal 23 immunization…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. The facility staff failed to notify all required agencies of an allegation of abuse that involved R11 and certified nursing assistant, CNA#3. On 11/21/24 a review of facility documentation was conducted, which includent the incident summary and the facility synopsis of an allegation of abuse that involved R11 and CNA#3. No documentation was found that showed that the Virginia Department of Health professions (DHP) was notified of the determination of abuse that involved a certified nursing assistant, identified as CNA3. While the incident summary was completed on 9/15/24. the facility fax confirmation read, no answer, for the DHP on 9/16/24 and 9/19/24, On 11/21/24 at 2:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with the administrator. The Administrator said, Sometimes the fax numbers are busy, and we have to keep faxing. The Administrator was not able to show that the incident had been successfully faxed to fulfill the required abuse reporting. On 11/22/24 a review of facility documentation was completed. CNA#3's employee file was reviewed and there was no sworn statement or criminal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide credible evidence of an investigation being conducted following an allegation of sexual abuse for one resident (Resident #120-R120) in a survey sample of 30 residents. The findings included: For Resident #120- R120, who made an allegation of being raped, the facility staff failed to have credible evidence of an investigation being conducted. On 11/20/24, the surveyor reviewed the facility documentation and electronic health record of R120, which noted that R120 discharged from the facility on 9/20/24. According to progress notes dated 9/20/24, which read in part, .Patient had a recent ECO [emergency custody order] for similar symptoms, primarily mania. Due to her current mental status, she likely does not have capacity to make appropriate medical decisions for herself. Because of patient's severe psychiatric symptoms, her interfering with staffs' ability to provide care to herself and others, and her creation of a hostile environment, she would be best served by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of thirty one residents. Resident #5 (R5) did not have a complete care plan developed for incontinence. The Findings Included Review of R5's clinical record noted diagnoses for R5 included incontinence of bowel and bladder, chronic congestive heart failure, and chronic atrial fibrillation. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/27/24, which assessed R5 with a cognitive score of 14 out of 15, indicating cognitively intact. On 11/19/24 at 11:41 a.m. during an interview, R5 verbalized having incontinent episodes and that the staff did a good job at keeping her clean and dry. Review of R5's MDS dated [DATE], Section H - Bowel and Bladder, documented that R5 was Always Incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of R5's care plan did not indicate a care plan had been developed for incontinence. On 11/21/24 at 11:54 a.m., license practical nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care for three residents, Resident #77 (R77), Resident #83 (R83), and Resident #5 (R5) out of a survey sample of 30 residents. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to administer oxygen to R77, according to the physician's order. On 11/20/24 at 9:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with R77. R77 said, Staff says all concentrators are broken and sometimes at night I am short of breath. At this time, it was observed that R77's oxygen concentrator setting was on 2.5 liters per minute. On 11/20/24 at 11:00 a.m., a review of R77's clinical record was conducted. The clinical record revealed that R77's physician's order was for oxygen therapy at 5 liters per min via tracheostomy mask every shift for hypercarbia. On 11/20/24 12:22 p.m., an interview was conducted with a licensed practical nurse, LPN5. LPN5 read the physician's order for R77's oxygen and stated that the setting should be at 5 liters per minute.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. Medication pass observations resulted in two errors out of thirty opportunities for an error rate of 6.67%. The findings include: 1. R274 was not administered a dose of gentamicin eye drops as ordered by the physician. A medication pass observation was conducted on 11/20/24 at 8:07 a.m. with registered nurse (RN #1) observed administering medications to Resident #274 (R274). R274 was administered all scheduled medications except gentamicin eye drops. RN #1 searched the medication cart and did not locate the drops. RN #1 stated the gentamicin eye drops were not available and that she would contact the pharmacy. R274's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 11/14/24 for gentamicin sulfate ophthalmic solution 0.3% with instructions to instill one drop in the left eye two times per day for 6 months. R274's medication administration record documented the drops were scheduled for administration each morning and evening. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide routine dental services to two residents (Resident #80-R80 and Resident #4-R4) in a survey sample of 30 residents. The findings included: 1. For R80, the facility staff failed to provide dental services following a recommendation for extractions. On 11/19/24 at 11:24 a.m., an interview was conducted with R80. R80 stated he is unable to eat because of his teeth and cancer and relies solely on nutritional drinks. When asked about his dental status, R80 said that he had gone to a dental clinic but was unable to be seen due to having expired identification. On 11/20/24, a clinical record review of R80's chart was conducted. According to a physician progress note dated 11/7/24, R80 was s/p [status post] antineoplastic chemotherapy and had a history of synovial sarcoma who had complications of dysphagia related to the pharyngeal/cervical mass . According to R80's dental services note dated 4/3/23, R80 was seen and the note read in part, Recommend…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a therapeutic diet and correctly provide foods per the meal ticket for one of thirty residents in the survey samplec, (Residents #103). Resident #103 (R103) was not provided foods per meal ticket for lunch. The findings include: According to the clinical record, diagnoses for R103 included severe protein calorie malnutrition, dementia, and iron deficiency anemia. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/31/24. R103 was assessed with a cognitive score of 12 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. An annual MDS, dated [DATE], Section K documented that R103 had un-prescribed weight loss. On 11/19/24 at 12:45 p.m., R103 lunch meal was observed, R103's meal ticket was verified against the meal served. The meal ticket indicated R103 was to receive a regular advanced dysphagia diet, with an added half cup of fortified pudding parfait and a bowl of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to honor food preferences for one of thirty residents in the survey sample (Resident #93). The findings include: Resident #93 was not provided a fruit salad as listed on the meal ticket and according to assessed food preferences. According to the clincal record, Resident #93 (R93) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included spinal stenosis, bradycardia, sick sinus syndrome, hypertension, neurogenic bladder, depression and insomnia. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R93 as cognitively intact. On 11/19/24 at 11:38 a.m., R93 was interviewed about quality of life/care in the facility. R93 stated that he was supposed to get a fruit salad each day for lunch and that he never gets the fruit. R93's clinical record documented the resident was prescribed a regular diet. A food preference assessment dated [DATE] listed that R93 liked/preferred fresh fruit. On 11/20/24 at 12:32 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate clinical record for one of thirty residents in the survey sample (Resident #94). The findings include: Resident #94's clinical record included documented hospice notes for three other residents (Residents #10, #26 and #101). According to the clinical record, Resident #94 (R94) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes, adult failure-to-thrive, protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic kidney disease, anxiety, and depression. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R94 with having short and long-term memory problems and severely impaired cognitive skills. Review of R94's clinical record revealed documentation regarding hospice care/services. Included in R94's clinical record were hospice notes/documentation for three other current residents in the facility, who were also receiving hospice services. The other residents' notes scanned into R94's clinical record were as follows: Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices during medication pass and pour observation on one of two units. The findings include: License practical nurse (LPN #1) was observed handling medications with cross contaminated gloved hands, during medication pass on unit 400. on 11/20/24 at 8:00 a.m., during a medication pass for Resident #15 (R15), LPN #1 (LPN1)was observed sanitizing her hands and applying gloves. Then LPN1 began using the computer to view information, before reaching into the medication cart draw to pull out needed medications (consisting of bulk bottled medications and medication card packs). LPN1 started popping medications into her hand, reaching into bulk bottled medications with her fingers, and placing the medications into the medication cup, before distributing the medications to R15. After giving medications to R15, LPN #1 then pushed the medication cart to R42's room, sanitized her hands, applied gloves, and again used the computer, placed hands on the table top of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to educate about and offer COVID-19 immunizations according to the facility's infection control policy for two of five residents reviewed (Residents #20 and #94). The findings include: On 11/21/24 at 11:45 a.m., accompanied by the regional infection preventionist (RN #2), five residents were reviewed for immunizations as part of the infection control survey task. Review of clinical records revealed no documentation of COVID-19 immunization status for Residents #20 and #94. The clinical records documented no education about or offering of the COVID-19 vaccine since their admission to the facility. On 11/21/24 at 2:09 p.m., the regional infection preventionist (RN #2) stated that she reviewed the clinical records and did not find any evidence Residents #20 or #94 had been offered the COVID-19 vaccine. The regional infection preventionist stated immunization status was supposed to be obtained upon admission to the facility and vaccines offered if not already received. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure oxygen concentrators were in proper working condition for one resident, Resident #77 (R77) out of a survey sample of 30 residents. The findings included: The facility staff failed to provide an oxygen concentrator that would administer the ordered liters of oxygen. On 11/20/24 at 9:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with R77. R77 said, Staff says all concentrators are broken and sometimes at night I am short of breath. At this time, it was observed that R77's oxygen concentrator setting was on 2.5 liters per minute. On 11/20/24 at 11:00 a.m., a review of R77's clinical record was conducted. The clinical record revealed that R77's physician's order was for oxygen therapy at 5 liters per min via tracheostomy mask every shift for hypercarbia. On 11/20/24 12:22 p.m., an interview was conducted with a licensed practical nurse, LPN5. LPN5 read the physician's order for R77's oxygen and stated that the setting should be at 5 liters per minute. Accompanying the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for one of nine residents in the survey sample, Resident #4. The findings include: For Resident #4 (R4), the facility staff failed to implement the resident's comprehensive care plan for pressure injury treatments. R4's comprehensive care plan dated 9/6/23 documented, Resident with potential impaired skin integrity or actual impaired skin integrity r/t (related to) pressure ulcer to right heel .Treatments as ordered .Left Achillies wound on admission 3/05/24 .TX (Treatment) as ordered . A review of R4's clinical record revealed the following physician's orders: 2/27/24-cleanse the stage three right heel wound with wound cleanser. Apply silvasorb gel to the wound bed and cover with gauze, ABD (wound dressing), and rolled gauze daily. 3/5/24-cleanse the left Achillies wound with wound cleanser, apply silvasorb, abd, kerlix every day. A wound physician note dated 5/7/24 documented a stage three right heel pressure injury measuring 1.9 cm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident/staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide incontinence care for dependent residents for three of nine residents, Resident #3, Resident #6 and #7. The findings include: 1.The facility staff failed to provide evidence of incontinence care for dependent Resident #3. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: DM (diabetes mellitus), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), congestive heart failure and encephalopathy. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a Medicare 5-day assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/31/23, coded the resident as scoring a 13 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired. A review of the MDS Section G-functional status coded the resident as being dependent for toileting, bathing and hygiene. A review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services to maintain residents' highest level of well-being for two of nine residents in the survey sample, Residents #4 and #5. The findings include: 1. For Resident #4 (R4), the facility staff failed to provide physician ordered treatments for the resident's arterial wound on multiple dates in May 2024. A review of R4's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 4/23/24 to cleanse the arterial left lateral heel with wound cleanser, apply silvasorb, gauze, abd pad (wound dressing), kerlix and ace wrap every day. A wound physician note dated 5/7/24 documented the wound as an arterial left lateral heel wound measuring 1.2 cm (centimeters) (length) x 1 cm (width) x 0.1 cm (depth). A review of R4's May 2024 TAR (treatment administration record) revealed the same physician's order. Further review of R4's May 2024 TAR failed to reveal treatment was administered on 5/11/24, 5/16/24, 5/18/24, and 5/26/24 (as evidenced by blank spaces on the TAR). Nurses'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services for the treatment of pressure injuries for one of nine residents in the survey sample, Resident #4. The findings include: For Resident #4 (R4), the facility staff failed to provide physician ordered treatments for the resident's stage three right heel pressure injury (1) and stage four left Achillies pressure injury (1) on multiple dates in May 2024. A review of R4's clinical record revealed the following physician's orders: 2/27/24-cleanse the stage three right heel wound with wound cleanser. Apply silvasorb gel to the wound bed and cover with gauze, ABD (wound dressing), and rolled gauze daily. 3/5/24-cleanse the left Achillies wound with wound cleanser, apply silvasorb, abd, kerlix every day. A wound physician note dated 5/7/24 documented a stage three right heel pressure injury measuring 1.9 cm (centimeters) (length) x 2.2 cm (width) x 0.5 cm (depth), with 75-99% slough (dead skin tissue) and a stage four left Achilles pressure injury measuring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a safe environment by monitoring the wander guard for one of nine residents, Residents #9. The findings include: During the abbreviated complaint survey 8/14/24 through 8/16/24 review of the facility event synopsis, the elopement of Resident #9 on 6/30/24 was reviewed. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to dementia, hypertension and macular degeneration. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/6/24, coded the resident as scoring a 04 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A review of the MDS Section GG-functional abilities and goals coded the resident as being dependent for bathing/transfer/dressing/toileting and supervision for eating. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident/staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a safe environment for one of nine residents, Resident #3. The findings include: The facility staff failed to ensure a safe environment for Resident #3. According to the clinical record, Resident #3 (R3) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included, but were not limited to, trach, hypertension, and psychoactive substance abuse. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, an admission assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/27/24, coded R3 as scoring a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating intact cognition. A review of the MDS (minimum data set) Section GG-functional abilities and goals coded R3 as being independent for walking/bathing/transfer/dressing/toileting, and eating. A review of R3's comprehensive care plan with a revision date of 1/5/23, revealed, FOCUS: Resident is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility's documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to allow the resident to make decisions regarding her treatment for one of nine residents, Resident #2. The findings included: The facility failed to allow the resident to make decisions regarding her treatment. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to encephalopathy, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), CHF (congestive heart failure) and DM (diabetes mellitus). The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a Medicare 5-day assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/31/23, coded the resident as scoring a 13 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired. A review of the MDS Section G-functional status coded the resident as requiring total dependence for transfer, bathing, bed mobility, dressing, hygiene and supervision for eating. A review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident/staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to report an allegation of resident who was on the roof with potential for self-harm for 1 of 9 residents, Resident #3. The findings include: The facility failed to report an allegation that a resident was on the roof with potential for self-harm, Resident #3. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to trach, hypertension and psychoactive substance abuse. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, an admission assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/27/24, coded the resident as scoring a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating Resident #3 was cognitively intact. A review of the MDS Section GG-functional abilities and goals coded Resident #3 (R3) as being independent for walking/bathing/transfer/dressing/toileting, and eating. A review of R3 comprehensive care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide treatment and services for one of nine resident's indwelling catheter, Residents #1. The findings include: The facility staff failed to provide treatment and services for Resident #1's indwelling catheter. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to toxic encephalopathy, obstructive/reflux uropathy and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, an admission assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/16/24, coded the resident as scoring a 03 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A review of the MDS Section GG-functional abilities and goals coded the resident as being dependent for bathing/transfer/dressing/toileting and eating. A review of the comprehensive care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-27 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure dignity and respect for one resident. Resident #1's (R1) personal belongs were removed and staff did not leave room after being asked. The Findings Include: Diagnoses for R1 included: Congestive heart failure, anxiety, depression, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/4/23. R1 was assessed with a cognitive score of 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of R1's clinical record documented a progress note dated 9/22/23, written by the administrator, indicating that R1 was selling food and beverages in the hallway and that it was explained to R1 that the practice of selling food was not allowed due to the diet orders of other residents. This note documented that food and beverage items were removed from the resident's possession, and that family had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident council interview, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to response promptly to call bells on three of four nursing units (100-unit, 200-unit and 300-unit). The findings include: On 9/11/23 at 4:00 p.m., eleven members of the facility's resident council were interviewed about call bell response. Resident #5 stated slow call bell response was an ongoing problem in the facility, especially on weekends. The other council members agreed with Resident #5 and described wait times from 15 minutes up to an hour. Resident #5 stated the poor call bell response had been a problem for months and had been discussed in monthly council meetings. Resident #5 stated there were times when only one aide was assigned to work on a unit and response times were slow because staff had to cover from another unit. Resident #5 stated she had experienced an incontinence accident because she was unable to hold her urine while waiting for assistance. Resident #6 stated she also waited at times beyond 15 minutes for her brief to be changed. Resident #7 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide a registered nurse (RN) at least eight consecutive hours per day for four out of thirty days in September 2022. The findings include: The facility's PBJ (payroll based journal) data for September 2022 documented no RN coverage was provided on 9/5/22, 9/10/22, 9/11/22 and 9/25/22. The facility's as-worked schedule documented no RN working on these dates. On 9/12/23 at 8:45 a.m., the director of nursing (DON) was interviewed about the lack of RN coverage during September 2022. The DON stated she had been working in the facility since April 2023 and registered nurses had been hired since September 2022 to meet the coverage requirement. The DON stated the RN coverage requirement was being met with currently employed registered nurses and contracted staff were also available if needed. On 9/12/23 at 11:42 a.m., the administrator was interviewed about RN coverage. The administrator reviewed the payroll records and confirmed that no RN worked on 9/5/22, 9/10/22, 9/11/22 and 9/25/22. On 9/12/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure reasonable care and protection of resident property from loss and/or theft for one of 27 residents (Resident #10) regarding an iPad and a framed painting; and failed to ensure a safe homelike environment for one of 27 residents (Resident #21) regarding the resident's room, room equipment and room furnishings. Findings include: 1. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility originally on 12/13/19, with the most current readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #10 included, but were not limited to: repeated falls, conversion disorder with seizures, narcolepsy, history of a stroke with left side paralysis, major depressive disorder, cognitive communication deficit, and dementia without behaviors. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment dated [DATE], which assessed the resident with a cognitive score of 15, indicating the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to review and revise a care plan for four of 27 residents in the survey sample, and failed to ensure residents were extended an invitation to the care plan meetings and active participation from the facility's required interdisciplinary team members for two of 27 residents in the survey sample. Resident #24, Resident #75, and Resident #21 care plans were not reviewed and revised regarding code status changes and Resident #35's care plan was not reviewed regarding medication changes. Resident #94 and Resident #12 were not extended invitations to the care plans meetings and facility's required interdisciplinary team members did not actively participate in the care plan meetings. The findings include: 1. Resident #24 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance, muscle contractures, anemia, hyperlipidemia, dysphasia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-24 · tag F0685 — patternAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure glasses were ordered to maintain vision for two of 27 residents, Resident's #12 and #94. The Findings Include: 1. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #12 included: Congestive heart failure, kidney disease, anxiety, and depression. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/25/21. Resident #12 was assessed with a cognitive score of 15 indicating cognitively intact. Section B of the current MDS documented Resident #12's vision was adequate with corrective lenses. On 06/22/21 at 12:21 PM. Resident #12 was interviewed. During the interview, Resident #12 discussed that she had an eye exam about a year ago and she was supposed to receive new glasses but never did get them. Resident #12's glasses were observed to have scratches on the lenes only one ear piece. On 06/23/21 at 9:41 AM, the social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-24 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure effective pest control in the facility for two resident rooms on the 400 unit (room [ROOM NUMBER] and 413), and in the hallway on the 400 unit, where gnats were observed; and failed to ensure effective pest control for flies and gnats observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 120 and 100 unit area. Findings include: Resident #35 (a resident with a cognitive score of 15) was interviewed on 06/22/21 at approximately 11:00 AM. The resident had his bedside table over him with a banana peel laying on the table. Several gnats were observed on the banana peel. Resident #35 was made aware of the gnats. The resident stated, Where? Resident #35 stated that he couldn't see very well and that he had poor vision and couldn't see the gnats. On 06/23/21 at 8:20 AM, Resident #35 was observed for a dressing change. The resident's physician was in the room performing a debridement of the resident's wound. Gnats…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to promote dignity and respect for one of 27 residents in the survey sample, Resident #43. Facility staff provided incontinence care and a bed linen change while the resident was verbally refusing the care. The findings include: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, heart failure, diabetes, cellulitis, anemia, peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, left eye blindness and peripheral neuropathy. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #43 with moderately impaired cognitive skills, as frequently incontinent of bladder, with little interests in doing things and having feelings of being down, depressed and/or hopeless. The MDS dated [DATE] documented the resident required the extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility and the extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide an accessible light switch for one of 27 residents in the survey sample, Resident #21. Resident #21's over-bed light was not equipped with a cord so the resident could turn the light on/off as desired. The findings include: Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #21 included right shoulder/hand contracture, spinal stenosis, dysphagia, hypertension, dementia with behaviors, congestive heart failure, lymphedema, seizures, osteoarthritis, cerebral infarction and neuropathy. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #21 with moderately impaired cognitive skills and adequate vision (sees fine details). On 6/22/21 at 12:45 p.m., Resident #21 was observed in his room and was interviewed at this time about quality of care and life in the facility. The resident stated he was not able to turn his over-bed light on/off…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-24 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete minimum data set (MDS) for two of 27 residents in the survey sample. MDS assessments for Resident #32 and #43 were incomplete with no indicators of cognitive status or mood. The findings include: 1. Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, heart failure, diabetes, cellulitis, anemia, peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, left eye blindness and peripheral neuropathy. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #43 with moderately impaired cognitive skills, with little interests in doing things and having feelings of being down, depressed and/or hopeless. Resident #43's clinical record documented an annual MDS dated [DATE]. Sections C for cognitive patterns and section D for mood indicators were not completed. The interview questions and assessment indicators were marked as not assessed or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure necessary care and treatment to prevent infection during a dressing change for one of 27 residents (Resident #35). Findings include: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the most recent readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #35 included, but were not limited to: muscle weakness, muscle wasting, atrophy, weakness, chronic pain, diabetes, heart failure and stage 4 pressure ulcer. The most current MD (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment dated [DATE]. This MDS assessed the resident with a cognitive status of 15, indicating the resident was intact for daily decision making skills. This MDS also assessed the resident with a stage 4 pressure ulcer that was present upon admission. During an interview with Resident #35 on 06/22/21 at approximately 11:00 AM. Resident #35 was asked about his pressure ulcer. The resident stated that was what brought him into the facility and that he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medication pass observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for one of 27 residents, Resident #61. Resident #61 did not have Lactulose solution (for treatment of constipation and liver disease) available to give during the morning medication pass. The findings include: Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #61 included: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, chronic kidney disease, viral hepatitis C, and constipation. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/1/21. Resident #61 was assessed with a cognitive score of 12 indicating cognitively intact. On 6/23/21 at 8:10 AM, during medication pass and pour, license practical nurse (LPN #1 ) began pulling medications for Resident #61. LPN #1 said Resident #61's Lactulose was not on the cart and was going to check in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-24 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to implement food preferences for two of 27 in the survey sample, Resident #109 and Resident #481. The findings include: 1. Resident #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paraplegia, surgical wound aftercare, osteomyelitis, multiple pressure wounds, muscle weakness, anemia, Vitamin B-12 deficiency, and embolism and thrombosis of veins. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] was the admission assessment and assessed Resident #109 as cognitively intact for daily decision making with a score of 15 out of 15. On 06/22/21 at 12:28 p.m., Resident #109 was observed in his room watching television. Resident #109 was interviewed regarding his quality of care since being admitted to the facility. Resident #109 stated, one of my biggest issues is the food, I believe it could be better. Resident #109 was about his food and dining preferences. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of care for two of 29 residents in the survey sample, Resident #105 and Resident #42. Resident #105 was administered another resident's medications in error. Nurses failed to clarify a physician's order prior to administration of a medication to Resident #42. The findings include: 1. Resident #105 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphasia, hypertension, depression, hemiplegia/hemiparesis, muscle weakness, anemia, and complex regional pain syndrome. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] coded the resident as being moderate cognitively impaired for daily decision making with a score of 8 out of fifteen. Resident #105's clinical record was reviewed on 07/31/19 at 9:30 a.m. Resident #105's clinical record documented a nursing note dated 07/04/19 at 11:57 a.m. as follows: This am (morning) res. (resident)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-08-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure physican's orders were in place for a hand splint for Resident # 1. Findings include: Resident # 1 was admitted to the facility 4/4/19 with a readmission date of 5/28/19. Diagnoses for Resident # 1 included, but not limited to: chronic congestive heart failure, cortical blindness, spina bifida, diabetes, history of stroke, and hemiplegia/hemiparesis of left side following stroke. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly review dated 7/19/19. Resident # 1 was assessed as being cognitively intact with a total summary score of 13 out of 15. During the initial tour of the facility 7/30/19 beginning at 10:15 a.m., Resident # 1 was observed with a splint on his left hand. When asked about the splint, Resident # 1 stated I had a stroke and a heart attack on the operating table; I wear this now because my hand is contracted. I think it's to help straighten out my fingers. Resident # 1 was then asked how many hours per day the splint was worn. Resident # 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility staff failed to implement care plan interventions for vision deficit for one of 29 residents, Resident #56; and failed to develop a care plan for a hand splint for one of 28 residents, Resident #1. Findings were: 1. Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, included, but not limited to: Major depressive disorder, elevated blood pressure, absolute glaucoma, legal blindness, hypokalemia and diabetes mellitus. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 06/17/2019 assessed Resident #56 as cognitively intact with a summary score of 15. On 07/30/2019 at approximately 12:15 p.m., Resident #56 was observed in her room. After knocking on the door, Resident #56 turned her head to the door and stated, Who's there? Resident #56 also stated, I'm blind .I can see your shape, but that's it. On 07/31/2019 at approximately 8:30 a.m., Resident #56 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide nail care for one of 29 residents, Resident #56. Findings were: Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, included, but not limited to: Major depressive disorder, elevated blood pressure, absolute glaucoma, legal blindness, hypokalemia and diabetes mellitus. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 06/17/2019 assessed Resident #56 as cognitively intact with a summary score of 15. On 07/31/2019 at approximately 8:30 a.m., Resident #56 was observed sitting on the side of her bed eating breakfast. The thumb nail on her right hand and the pinky nail of her left hand were observed as long, dark in color and curved. All of her other nails were cut short. She was asked why those two nails were long. She stated, Nobody has cut them. She was asked why the others were short. She stated, I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to physician orders for three of 29 residents in the survey sample. Facilty staff failed to obtain vital signs every 4 hours after a medication error for Resident #105; failed to follow orders for medication administration for Resident #123, and failed to implement a bowel management program for Resident #76. The findings include: 1. Resident #105 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphasia, hypertension, depression, hemiplegia/hemiparesis, muscle weakness, anemia, and complex regional pain syndrome. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] coded the resident as being moderate cognitively impaired for daily decision making with a score of 8 out of fifteen. Resident #105's clinical record was reviewed on 07/31/19 at 9:30 a.m. Resident #105's clinical record documented a nursing note dated 07/04/19 at 11:57 a.m. as followed: This am (morning)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders to float heels while in bed, for one of 29 residents in the survey sample, Resident #121. The Findings Include: Resident #121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #121 included; Diabetes, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and dysphagia. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/10/19. Resident #121 was assessed with a score of 4 indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 7/30/19 Resident # 121's medical record was reviewed. An active physician's order dated 10/4/16 documented float heels when in bed to decrease pressure on heels. On 7/31/19 at 9:50 AM, Resident #121 was observed laying in bed. Resident #121's certified nursing assistant (CNA #3) was standing just outside Resident #121's door and was asked to observe Resident #121's heels while in bed. Resident #121's heels were observed laying against…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one of 29 residents in the survey sample was free of unnecessary medications. Resident # 71 in the survey sample had a PRN (as needed) order for Ativan for longer than 14 days without a stop date. The findings were: Resident # 71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hyperlipidemia, Cerebral Palsy, Non-Alzheimer's dementia, seizure disorder, anxiety disorder, depression, psychotic disorder, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, moderate intellectual disabilities, generalized muscle weakness, tracheostomy status, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. According to the most recent Minimum Data Set, a Quarterly review with an Assessment Reference Date of 6/6/19, the resident was assessed under Section C (Cognitive Patterns) as being severely cognitively impaired, with a Summary Score of 02 out of 15. Resident 71 had the following order, dated 10/9/17, for Ativan solution 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to label a medication accurately for one of 29 residents in the survey sample. Resident #42's medication Synthroid was labeled by the pharmacy with inaccurate dosage instructions. The findings include: Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #42 included cerebral infarction, lymphedema, diabetes, hypothyroidism, atrial fibrillation, obesity and high blood pressure. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #42 as cognitively intact. A medication pass observation was conducted on 7/31/19 at 7:40 a.m., with licensed practical nurse (LPN #1) administering medication to Resident #42. Among the medications administered to Resident #42 was Synthroid 50 mcg. Resident #42's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 1/7/18 for Synthroid 50 mcg each morning with instructions to give the 50 mcg tablet along with a 12.5 mcg tablet for a total…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-01 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure laboratory results were promptly reported to the physician for one of 29 residents (Resident #77). Findings include: Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the most current readmission 4/17/19. Diagnoses for Resident #77 included, but were not limited to: history of a stroke, diabetes mellitus, obesity, hyponatremia, neuropathy, high blood pressure, peripheral vascular disease, above the knee amputation of the left leg and seizure disorder. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment dated [DATE]. This MDS assessed the resident with a cognitive score of 12, indicating the resident had moderate impairment in daily decision making skills During clinical record review, the resident's nursing notes documented that on 6/10/19 (Monday) the resident had new onset of involuntary extremity jerking on the right side and the resident was administered lorazepam 0.5 mg (milligrams) as a one time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a medication pass and pour observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for medication administration. Finding include: On 07/31/19 at 7:45 AM during a medication pass and pour observation, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) #4 applied gloves and began preparing medications for Resident #74. LPN #4 prepared ordered medications, which included two baclofen tablets. LPN #4 took the medications to the resident with gloved hands. Resident#74 took the cup of pills and dropped one onto the bed, which then fell to the floor. The medication tablet was picked up by LPN #4 with her gloved hand. The medication was identified as baclofen. LPN #4 took the pill and the resident's water cup and threw it into the trash can. LPN #4 told the resident that she would replace the dropped medication with a new pill. LPN #4 went to the medication cart, pushed a new baclofen tablet pill out of a blister card package, touching the pill with her gloved hand and put the tablet into the medication cup and took the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC MSTR LSCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/01/2017 |
| ROMEO, DOMINIC | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2023 |
| STOLTZ, CHARLES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/01/2017 |
| WILHEIM, RONALD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/01/2017 |
| CEDARS MGT CO., LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/17/2025 |
| DAVIS, JEREMIAH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2025 |
| EKI, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| GROVES, DONNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| ODENTHAL, RICHARD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/09/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $699K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495153. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.