No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Battlefield Park Healthcare Center

250 Flank Road, Petersburg, VA 23805 · For profit - Corporation · 119 certified beds · (804) 861-2223 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (804) 861-2223 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Sep 2019Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)4 actual-harm citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2019
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 4 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2731 S Crater Rd · (804) 520-1080 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.5 mi
3298 S Crater Rd · (804) 733-6216 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3500 S Crater Rd · (804) 363-2790 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2925 S Crater Rd · (804) 733-8484

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.5%14.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.0%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.6%18.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%3.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.0%15.6%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.8%20.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.1%94.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.5%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.4%14.2%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.9%73.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.9%22.3%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.5%11.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.651.521.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.571.481.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.0%CMS range 26.9–60.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.3%CMS range 8.1–16.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.2–12.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.211.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.96
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.25
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
50.9%
Total nursing turnover
85.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 105.2 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-09-19)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2021-08-17)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

72 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 58 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2019-09-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure 3 residents were free from abuse and/or neglect (Residents #37 and 93, who was abused by Resident #43) in a survey sample of 42 residents. This resulted in harm for Resident #37. The findings included: 1. For Resident #37, the facility staff neglected to provide goods and services to prevent continuing significant weight loss, resulting in severe malnutrition, and an unstageable pressure sore not identified by staff until the wound was first identified with eschar, and unstageable, all resulting in harm. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: hypertension, anemia, arthritis, chronic kidney disease moderate, high cholesterol, heart disease, seizures, and a history of dysphagia. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was a quarterly assessment with an assessment reference…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2019-09-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide treatment and services to prevent and heal pressure sores for one Resident (Residents #37) in a survey sample of 42 Residents, resulting in harm for Resident #37. The findings included; 1. For Resident #37, the facility staff failed to provide adequate nutrition, and preventive devices, and care, for a Resident at risk of developing pressure sores, leading to the development of a pressure sore first identified as an unstageable ulcer with eschar, resulting in harm. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: hypertension, anemia, arthritis, chronic kidney disease moderate, high cholesterol, heart disease, seizures, and a history of dysphagia. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was a quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9-9-19. Resident #37 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2019-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review facility staff failed to ensure Residents were free from accidents and hazards, for 2 residents (Residents #38, and #31) of 42 residents in the survey sample, resulting in harm for Resident #38. In addition, the facility staff failed to maintain water temperatures in a range to prevent burns, scalding and other injuries on 2 of 2 nursing units. The findings included: 1. For Resident #38, the facility staff failed provide the 2 needed staff members for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care leading to a fall, fracture, and head injury, resulting in harm. Resident #38 was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: hypertension, anemia, contractures of the right and left knees, dementia without behavioral disturbances, quadriplegia, peripheral vascular disease, gastrostomy tube for feeding, and high cholesterol. The closest Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment to the time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2019-09-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. For Resident #28, the facility failed to ensure that he was offered adequate hydration. Resident #28 was a [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #28's diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Muscle Weakness, and Hypertension. The Minimum Data Set, which was an admission Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 4/22/19 was reviewed. Resident #28 was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. He was also coded as requiring set up assistance with meals, and being able to ambulate independently with his wheelchair. On 9/16/19 a review was conducted of Resident #28's clinical record, revealing the following diet order: 4/22/19. Renal diet. Regular texture, Large Portions, Sandwich 3 times a day at meals. On 9/15/19 at 1:40 P.M. an interview was conducted with Resident #28 in his room. His lunch had not been served. He stated that he wanted some apple juice, or something other than water to drink. Other than water there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on visitor interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to report an allegation of neglect for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #1.The findings included:Resident #1's clinical record listed diagnoses which included but not limited to vascular dementia and diabetes mellitus.Resident #1's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 01/29/26 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 3 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is severely cognitively impaired. Section B, Hearing, Speech, and Vision, coded the resident as having clear speech. Section P, alarms and restraints, coded the resident as using a wander/elopement alarm daily. Resident #1's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a plan for . wanders aimlessly from place to place and is an elopement risk. Interventions for this care plan include notify staff of wandering and elopement risk and wanderguard in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on visitor interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to complete a thorough investigation of allegation of neglect for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #1.The findings included:Resident #1's clinical record listed diagnoses which included but not limited to vascular dementia and diabetes mellitus.Resident #1's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 01/29/26 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 3 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is severely cognitively impaired. Section B, Hearing, Speech, and Vision, coded the resident as having clear speech. Section P, alarms and restraints, coded the resident as using a wander/elopement alarm daily. Resident #1's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a plan for . wanders aimlessly from place to place and is an elopement risk. Interventions for this care plan include notify staff of wandering and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, and a review of clinical records, the facility staff failed to develop a care plan that addressed the preference for a plant-based diet for one of four residents (Resident #1) in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], as a transfer from another long-term care facility under hospice care. The current diagnoses included malignant ovarian and endometrial cancer, use of a right nephrostomy tube secondary to hydronephrosis with a ureteral stricture, and bilateral lymphedema of the lower extremities. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of July 10, 2025, coded the resident as having completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated that Resident #1's cognitive abilities for daily decision-making were intact. In section GG0130. (Self-Care), Resident #1 was coded as dependent in the following areas:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of clinical records, the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for one of four residents (Resident #3) in the survey sample. The findings included:Resident #3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], as a transfer from another long-term care facility. The current diagnoses included a history of a stroke, diabetes, high blood pressure, and a contracted right hand with in-hand curled fingers. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of April 25, 2025, coded the resident as having completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated that Resident 3's cognitive abilities for daily decision-making were intact.In section GG0130. (Self-Care), Resident #1 was coded as independent with eating, toileting, rolling in bed, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and a review of clinical records, the facility staff failed to make reasonable efforts to honor and meet the meal choices and preferences of one of four residents (Resident #1) in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], as a transfer from another long-term care facility under hospice care. The current diagnoses included malignant ovarian and endometrial cancer, use of a right nephrostomy tube secondary to hydronephrosis with a ureteral stricture, and bilateral lymphedema of the lower extremities. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of July 10, 2025, coded the resident as having completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated that Resident #1's cognitive abilities for daily decision-making were intact. In section GG0130. (Self-Care), Resident #1 was coded as dependent in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and review of clinical records, the facility staff failed to ensure that the written plan of care included both the most recent hospice plan of care and a description of the services for one of four residents (Resident #1) in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], as a transfer from another long-term care facility under hospice care. The current diagnoses included malignant ovarian and endometrial cancer, use of a right nephrostomy tube secondary to hydronephrosis with a ureteral stricture, and bilateral lymphedema of the lower extremities. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of July 10, 2025, coded the resident as having completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated that Resident #1's cognitive abilities for daily decision-making were intact. In section GG0130. (Self-Care), Resident #1 was coded as dependent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and a review of clinical records, the facility staff failed to administer medications as ordered for one of four residents (Resident #1) in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], as a transfer from another long-term care facility under hospice care. The current diagnoses included malignant ovarian and endometrial cancer, use of a right nephrostomy tube secondary to hydronephrosis with a ureteral stricture, and bilateral lymphedema of the lower extremities. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of July 10, 2025, coded the resident as having completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated that Resident #1's cognitive abilities for daily decision-making were intact. In section GG0130. (Self-Care), Resident #1 was coded as dependent in the following areas: oral care, toileting, upper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure a Resident's right to a dignified existence for 4 Residents (# 5, # 33, # 58 and #114) in a survey sample of 42 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #5 the facility staff failed to ensure the facial hair on her chin was removed. Resident #5's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 8/27/24 coded Resident #5 as having a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 5/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #5 was coded as requiring partial or moderate assistance of 1 staff with bathing, dressing and grooming. Resident #5 had diagnoses that included but were not limited to type 2 Diabetes, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), chronic kidney disease stage 4, hypertension, congestive heart failure, depression, cellulitis of left lower limb, and atrial fibrillation. On 9/17/24 at approximately 12:00 p.m. Resident #5 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to arrange regular unit council meetings for residents and/or family representatives. The findings included: An interview was conducted with the facility's Activities Assistant (AA) on 9/17/24 at approximately 1:30 PM. The AA stated that the Activities Director (AD) had been out on leave since January of this year, and she had been working alone in the department since then. The AA also stated that she was not officially trained to set up unit council meetings, but she has been doing the best she could. The AA stated that the Executive Director (ED) helped her with the most recent unit council meeting this month. The AA further stated that she did miss ensuring meetings were held some months this year. An interview was conducted with the ED on 9/18/24 at approximately 11:45 AM. The ED stated that the AD went out on leave in January and then resigned last month. ED also stated that the position is posted and that she has been working with the AA to assure unit council meetings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0574 — pattern
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to ensure residents were aware of their right to contact the Ombudsman to advocate for them and of their right to file a complaint with the state certification agency. The findings included: During the unit council meeting held in the facility on 9/18/24 at approximately 2:30 PM, zero of the six residents that attended was aware of what or who their Ombudsman was or how to contact them. Also, zero of the six residents in attendance were aware that they could make a complaint with the state agency and where they could find the information to do so. An interview was conducted with the facility's Activities Assistant (AA) on 9/18/24 at approximately 4:00 PM. When asked, Has it been your practice to assure residents know how to contact the Ombudsman and/or file a complaint with the state agency if necessary? The AA said, no. When asked, Have you ever observed the previous AD assure residents were aware of how to find this information? The AA said, no. An interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 58 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to ensure residents packages were received unopened. The findings included: During the unit council meeting held in the facility on 9/18/24 at approximately 2:30 PM, three of the six residents that attended complained that their packages are always opened when received. These residents said that their mail is received unopened, but packages were always opened. The residents were frustrated and said it was an invasion of their privacy. An interview was conducted with the facility's Executive Director (ED) on 9/18/24 at approximately 4:15 PM. The ED stated that residents should received their mail and packages unopened and that she was unaware that resident's packages have been received open. The facility's policy titled Resident's Rights, undated reads, Residents have a right to have privacy in sending and receiving mail. On 9/19/24 at approximately 5:00 PM, the above findings were shared with the Executive Director (Administrator), Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure a clean, comfortable homelike environment for the Residents on the 100's hall and any Residents that receive food from the kitchen. The findings included: For the Residents on the e100's hall and those receiving food from the kitchen the following observations were made: 9/17/24 - 9/19/24 - during the 3 days of survey flies and gnats were noted in the conference room by all surveyors, dead bugs were noted in light fixtures throughout the building. 9/17/24 at 11:55 a.m. - floors in the hallway have stains near room [ROOM NUMBER] and 111. 9/17/24 at 12:05 p.m. - room [ROOM NUMBER] A area above bed has been repaired and spackled but not painted. 9/17/24 at 12:10 p.m. - room [ROOM NUMBER] B IV pole and floor have brownish substance dried on them appears to be tube feeding. 9/17/24 at 1:30 p.m. - Shower room was cluttered with 4 shower chairs a shower stretcher a weight scale, 2 vital signs machines, an IV pole. There were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Resident interview, clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed prior to admission for 3 Residents(Residents #92, #104, & #84) in a sample of 42 residents. The Findings included: 1. Resident #92 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms, anxiety disorder, and avoidant restrictive food intake disorder. Physicians orders for medications were reviewed and revealed several psychotropic medications actively being administered for agitation, frustration, yelling and ongoing behavior monitoring. Those medications are listed as follows; Trazadone/Desyrel - for depression Mirtazipine/Remeron - for clinical depression Buspar/buspirone - for depression Duloxetine/cymbalta - for major depressive/anxiety disorder It is notable to mention that Trazodone, Duloxetine, and Buspar are not recommended to be administered together as combined they may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and review of the clinical record, the facility staff failed to provide appropriate care and services to manage indwelling catheters for 2 of 42 residents (Resident #67 and 81), in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident # 67's indwelling catheter was anchored to prevent dislodgement and or trauma. Resident #67 was originally admitted to the facility 2/4/2022 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included quadriplegia, stage 4 pressure ulcers of the left groin and right gluteal fold and an obstructive uropathy. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/6/24 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #67's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. The resident's active Physician Order Summary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interview, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to coordinate mental health services for a resident with a diagnosis of depression, who was voicing feelings of increased depression for 1 of 42 residents (Resident #81), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #81 was originally admitted to the facility 04/15/22 and readmitted to the facility from an acute care hospital stay on 11/2/23. The current diagnoses included a depression disorder diagnosed, 10/16/2015. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/19/24 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #76's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section D (Resident Mood Interview) the resident was assessed as feeling tired or having little energy 7 - 11 days, having trouble falling or staying asleep, or sleeping too much 12 -14 days and having little interest or pleasure in doing things 12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to remove expired Covid 19 tests, an expired medication, and expired wound dressings stored in 2 of 2 medication storage rooms; failed to provide the date medications were opened and stored in 1 of 4 medication administration carts. The findings included: 1. On 9/18/24 at 3:10 PM an observation of the medication storage room on Wing 2 with LPN (D) revealed 11 boxes of BinaxNow Covid19 tests expired on 10/27/23. On 9/19/24 at 11:10 AM an interview was conducted with the Regional Nursing Consultant. The Regional Nursing Consultant stated that the BinaxNow Covid 19 tests are expired, and the facility is not able to use these tests. She also stated that these tests have been disposed of, so they are no longer able to be used. 2. On 9/18/24 at 3:48 PM an observation of the medication storage room on Wing 1 with Registered Nurse (RN) (B) revealed: in the refrigerator, there was 1 opened multi-dose vial of Insulin Lantus 100 units/ml with an open date of 7/12/24. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility's staff failed to offer and provide snacks at bedtime. The findings included: There were no observations made during this survey from 9/17/24 to 9/19/24 of snacks being offered or provided to residents. During the unit council meeting held in the facility on 9/18/24 at approximately 2:30 PM, the six residents that attended complained that they do not get offered snacks and do not receive snacks on a regular basis. The residents stated that it is random and rare to receive snacks at bedtime. The residents also stated, when they do get snacks, they are full of sugar, such as fig bars and cakes. The residents further stated that they have witnessed the dietary staff bring snacks to the unit occasionally, and the nursing staff left them at the desk. The residents stated this allowed the residents who could get to the desk get a snack but the residents who could not, did not. An interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 9/19/24 at approximately 3:15 PM. The DM stated that he is aware snacks are a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff Interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to prepare and serve food in a safe and sanitary manner. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure the ice machine plumbing had an air gap to prevent the back flow of contaminated water, and failed to maintain a sanitary food storage and preparation area in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. On 9-17-24 at approximately 12:00 PM, the kitchen area of the facility was inspected with the dining services manager, and Regional food Services Director. In the main kitchen food preparation and cooking area a clean silverware tray was found on a rolling cart with a dish sponge on a stick commingled with the clean silverware. the sponge was wrapped in plastic wrap and when opened dead insects resembling small flies fell out, and some were still imbedded in it. On a separate cart covered in a brown liquid sticky substance, was noted bread clips, food crumbs and food debris, commingled with clean glasses which were stacked on the cart for use with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests and rodents. The findings included For the facility, the facility staff failed to follow the pest control company recommendations for reducing / eliminating pests from the facility. On 9/17/24 during the initial tour of the kitchen Surveyor C noted mouse droppings in the dry storage area, small flies in a dish washing sponge placed in a tray with Clean silverware 9/17/24 - 9/19/24 - during the 3 days of survey flies and gnats were noted in the conference room by all surveyors, dead bugs were noted in light fixtures throughout the building, and gnats and flies noted throughout the building in various Resident rooms. A review of the pest control book revealed the following excerpts from the service receipts: 4/19/24: Finding: Exit door doesn't close /seal properly ¼ inch or greater gap exists. Fire door in 100 wing facing sheds is rusted and potentially needs to be replaced. Exit door doesn't close /seal properly ¼…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the resident record, staff interviews and a review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in writing of a hospital discharges for 1 of 42 residents (Resident #67), in the survey. The findings included: Resident #67 was originally admitted to the facility 2/4/2022 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included quadriplegia, stage 4 pressure ulcers of the left groin and right gluteal fold and an obstructive uropathy. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/6/24 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #67's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. A Nurse Practitioner's note dated 11/8/23 read that Resident #67 was observed unresponsive by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). The note further read that the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one Resident (#84) in a survey sample of 40 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #84 the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that addressed the current contracture to left hand and measures to prevent further contracture. Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to gastrostomy tube, epilepsy, history of venous thrombosis and embolism, dvt/pulmonary embolism, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, aphasia (inability to speak) following cerebrovascular disease, and depression. Resident #84's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 8/21/24 coded the Resident as having a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 99 - unable to evaluate as Resident is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services to maintain good grooming, and personal hygiene for three Residents (#'s 5, 38 and 60) in a survey sample of 40 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #5 the facility staff failed to ensure she received adequate assistance for showering bathing and grooming. Resident #5 's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 8/27/24 coded Resident #5 as having a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 5/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #5 was coded as requiring partial or moderate assistance of 1 staff with bathing, dressing and grooming. Resident #5 had diagnoses that included but were not limited to type 2 Diabetes, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), chronic kidney disease stage 4, hypertension, congestive heart failure,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure Residents receive appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility, for 1 Resident (#84) in a survey sample to 40 Residents. The findings included: For Resident # 84 the facility staff failed to address the contracture of left hand, failed to implement any measures to reduce consequences of contracture and reduce likelihood of worsening of contracture. Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to gastrostomy tube, epilepsy, history of venous thrombosis and embolism, dvt/pulmonary embolism, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, aphasia (inability to speak) following cerebrovascular disease, and depression. Resident #84's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 8/21/24 coded the Resident as having a BIMS (Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure that Residents who are fed by enteral feeding received appropriate treatment and services and to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 2 Residents (#'s 12 & 84) in a survey sample of 40 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #12 the facility staff failed to ensure 60 ml (milliliter) syringe used for peg tube maintenance were clean and changed daily, failed to ensure that tube feeding was correctly labeled and dated On 9/17/24 at 11:46 a.m. observation was made of Resident #12 in bed dressed in a hospital gown, she had empty bottle of tube feeding hanging undated, and an undated used 60 ml syringe hanging in the plastic wrap from the IV pole. The syringe had thick curdled tube feeding in the base of it, the pump was turned to the off position and the water flush bag was half empty but also undated. The tubing for the tube feeding had no date or time. A review of the clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure that a Resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 1 Resident (#40) in a survey sample of 40 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #40 the facility staff failed to ensure that oxygen tubing was dated when first applied and that the Resident had an order for PRN use of oxygen. On 9/17/24 at approximately 11:45 a.m. Resident #40 was observed in bed dressed in a hospital gown, she was not using oxygen at this time. An oxygen concentrator was by her bedside, the tubing was connected to the concentrator and the end of the tubing with the nasal cannula was on the floor by the bed. The oxygen tubing was not in a plastic bag, and it was not dated. When Resident #40 was asked if she uses oxygen, she stated that she used it only when she became short of breath, and sometimes at night. On 9/17/24 at 12:15 p.m. the oxygen concentrator was again observed with the tubing laying on the floor undated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure Residents were free from unnecessary medications to include duplicate drug therapy for 1 Resident (#5) in a survey sample of 40 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #5 the facility staff failed to ensure the Resident did not receive duplicate drug therapy of the antihistamines Loratadine (Claritin) and cetirizine (Zyrtec). On 9/18/24 during clinical record review it was noted that Resident #5 had the following orders: Cetirizine Oral Tablet 10 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for seasonal allergies -Start Date- 05/24/2024 Loratadine Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for seasonal allergies -Start Date- 09/13/2024 [*Please note this Resident was being given both of these medications at the 9:00 a.m. med pass] A review of the orders revealed that one order was entered by the Medical Director and the other was entered by the NP (Nurse Practitioner). These medications are both second generation antihistamines and not usually prescribed together as they both are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure Residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 Resident (# 84) in a survey sample of 40 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #84 the facility staff failed to ensure that Resident # 84's blood pressure was checked prior to administering Midodrine (a vasopressor medication that raises low blood pressure). Resident #84 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 99 -unable to evaluate as Resident is nonverbal. Resident #84 has diagnosis of but not limited to intercranial injury, intraparenchymal hemorrhage, seizures, right hemiplegia, dvt/pulmonary embolism, dysphagia, peg tube and is under hospice care. A review of the clinical record revealed the following order: 6/6/24 -Midodrine HCl Oral Tablet 10 MG -Give 1 tablet via PEG-Tube every 8 hours as needed for hypotension sbp [systolic blood pressure] less than 100, for 14 Days. Hold for sbp.> [above]115 A review of the MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed that the order was started on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-08-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to dispose of garbage properly in one of three trash receptacles (dumpster near the small employee parking lot) outside the facility. On 8/16/2021 at 8:30 AM, the large garbage dumpster near the smaller staff parking lot on the right side of the facility was observed with several white trash bags and cardboard boxes visible at least twelve inches above the level of the top of the dumpster. There was no cover over the top of the dumpster. There was debris on the ground around the dumpster. The debris consisted of several pieces of paper, and gloves. On 8/16/2021 at 10:57 AM, further inspection of the dumpster revealed several rusted holes in the front and sides and several flies were seen on top of the bags of trash visible above the top of the dumpster. Inside the bags, containers of orange juice, other food items and blue pads were observed. There was a very foul odor emanating from the dumpster. There was an odor of urine and feces noted. On 8/17/2021 at 8:20 AM, the garbage dumpster again was observed with bags…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy regarding the screening of employees for 15 employees (Employee B, Employee D, Employee E, Employee F, Employee G, Employee H, RN A, RN B, LPN A, LPN B, LPN C, CNA A, CNA B, CNA C, and CNA E) in a sample of 25 employee records reviewed. The findings included: On 8/16/21, Surveyor C conducted a review of 25 employee files and revealed the following: 1. The facility staff failed to obtain a criminal background check within 30 days of hire for 8 Employees (Employee D, Employee E, Employee F, Employee G, Employee H, LPN A, LPN C, and CNA C). 2. The facility staff failed to perform professional license verification to ensure nursing employees held current licensure or certification and to determine if they had been subject to disciplinary action against their professional license as a result of abuse, neglect or mistreatment for 8 employees (Employee B, Employee E, Employee F, RN B, LPN A, LPN B, LPN C, and CNA C). 3. The facility staff failed to check references prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-17 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to accurately code an MDS (minimum data set) assessment for four Residents (Residents #11 ,# 54, #11, #84, #33 ) in a survey sample of 40 Residents. Findings included: 1. For Resident # 11, the facility staff failed to assess the Resident's cognitive functioning in Section C: Cognitive Pattern in the Quarterly assessment dated [DATE]. Resident # 11 was a [AGE] year old admitted to the facility 12/22/2020. Resident # 11's diagnoses included but were not limited to: Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Diabetic ulcers bilateral feet, osteomyelitis and History of Diabetes (Non-compliant). The most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was a Quarterly Assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 5/11/2021. Review of Section C:Cognitive Pattern revealed Resident # 11 did not have a Brief Interview for Memory score because the cognitive assessment had several sections documented as dashes and was not assessed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-17 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed for one resident (Resident #51 in the sample of 40 residents) to continue skilled care services following the issuance of a SNF ABN (skilled nursing facility advance beneficiary notice). Resident #51 did not choose to discontinue services. This failure prevented the Resident from excercising her right to continue to receive skilled care services, and have Medicare make the coverage determination or the Resident pay privately for the services. The findings included: Resident #51, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE]. Resident #51's diagnoses included but were not limited to: hypertension, renal insufficiency, dementia and Parkinson's disease. Resident #51's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/23/21, was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #51 was coded as her cognitive skills for daily decision making…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-17 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to obtain a PASARR (pre-admission screening) for 2 Residents (Resident #22 and Resident #207) in a sample of 40 Residents. This deficient practice has the potential to negatively impact both Residents, by failing to have a level I PASARR, the facility staff were not aware if the 2 Residents required a level II screening to determine if specialized services for the treatment of/for mental disorders and/or intellectual disabilities was warranted. 1. For Resident #22 the facility staff failed to obtain a PASARR, level I screening prior to admission. 2. For Resident #207 the facility staff failed to ensure a PASARR was completed prior to entry to the facility. The findings included: 1. For Resident #22 the facility staff failed to obtain a PASARR, level I screening prior to admission. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #22 included but were not limited to: unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide incontinence care in a timely manner for 1 (Resident # 92) in a survey sample of 40 residents. The Findings included: For Resident #92, the facility staff failed to answer the call bell and provide incontinence care in a timely manner. Resident #92, was a [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The diagnoses included history of a stroke, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, high cholesterol, hemiplegia or hemiparesis from stroke, seizure disorder, anxiety disorder, COPD, and depression. Resident # 92's most recent MDS (minimum data set) coded the resident as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of seven, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident was also coded as requiring the extensive physical assistance of two people for bed mobility. Resident #92 is coded as requiring total the dependence of 2 people for transfers, dressing, toilet use, personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide services to prevent pressure ulcers, for 1 Resident (#36) in a survey sample of 40 Residents. The Findings included: For Resident #36 the facility staff failed to prevent a pressure area from developing from wearing tight shoes. Resident #36 was a [AGE] year-old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #36's diagnoses included stroke, high, cholesterol, difficulty walking, muscle weakness and long term current use of steroids. Resident #36's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/8/21, coded the Resident has having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 11 out of 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #36 was also coded as requiring the extensive physical assistance of two people for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. He is coded as requiring the extensive physical assistance of one person for dressing, personal hygiene, eating and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-17 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility documentation, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed for 1 Resident #207 to provide medially-related social services to attain or maintain highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: For Resident #207, the facility staff failed to have her seen by the Social Worker in a timely manner when she was when she was asking to leave. Resident #207 failed to comply with isolation, and had a known diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, She was her own responsible party. Resident #207, a [AGE] year-old, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a CVA affecting the left non-dominant side, essential primary hypertension, type II diabetes with peripheral neuropathy, schizoaffective disorder, and depression. Resident #207 had only been in the facility for 3 days, therefore she did not have a completed MDS (Minimum Data Set). Per her admission assessment Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy for 1 resident (Resident #38) in a survey sample of 42 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #38, the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy by not notifying the state agency timely after a serious injury, and failing to file an accurate 5 day follow up report to the state agency of the results of their internal investigation. Resident #38 was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: hypertension, anemia, contractures of the right and left knees, dementia without behavioral disturbances, quadriplegia, peripheral vascular disease, gastrostomy tube for feeding, and high cholesterol. The closest Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment to the time period associated with the event that injured Resident #38, was a significant change assessment with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-17 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to provide annual nursing staff training based on their annual reviews for 5 out of 5 sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA). The Findings included: The facility staff failed to provide annual training based on their annual performance reviews. On 9/17/19, a review was conducted of employee records. The facility Staff Coordinator (Employee J) was interviewed in her office. The employee records were computer-based. The Staff Coordinator utilized her computer to facilitate the review. The records did not contain documentation identifying the required training for the identified employees based on their annual review. In addition, according to the Relias System Course Completion History, the facility failed to implement required annual training for the following employees: Employee and Training Due Date (CNA O) 9/7/19 (CNA P) 9/14/19 (CNA A) 7/14/19 (CNA S) 7/20/19 (CNA T) 7/31/19 When asked about the importance of staff completing their training requirements, the Staff Coordinator stated, Deficits in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility record review, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to label and store medications and medical supplies within accepted professional principles in one of two medications rooms and on one of four medications carts. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to remove expired medical supplies from the medication storage room, to prevent the use of expired items. On [DATE] at approximately 10:40 AM an observation of the medication storage room on station 1 was performed with LPN E. Observation revealed in a locked cabinet the following items: * a dressing kit. Medline dressing change tray with an origination date of [DATE] on the prescription label. The label also stated discard after [DATE]. LPN E stated, I've never heard of these people, (referencing she didn't know the Residents whose name was on the prescription label). * MaxPlus- clear needless connector with an origination date of [DATE] on the prescription label and a discard date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to effectively wear a hair restraint during meal preparation, and failed to ensure that an unidentified green vegetable was labeled and dated in the refrigerator in one of one kitchens. The Findings included: The facility cook (Employee I) failed to effectively restrain his moustache. And; The facility staff failed to ensure that an unidentified green vegetable was labeled and dated in the refrigerator. On 9/15/19 at 1:00 P.M. a tour was conducted of the facility kitchen. The cook (Employee I) was not wearing his beard restraint over his moustache, which was approximately one-quarter inch long. When asked about the effectiveness of his hair restraint, the cook stated, I usually wear it this way, indicating that he usually did not restrain the hair on his upper lip. The kitchen Manager (Employee O) was present. He stated, I have told him many times to cover his moustache. The kitchen refrigerator contained a plastic bowl covered with cellophane. There was no label identifying the item,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-17 · tag F0839 — pattern
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to obtain verification of licensure for 6 of 6 Registered Dieticians. The Findings included: On 9/16/19 a review was conducted of facility staff, including Registered Dieticians. The facility Staff Coordinator stated that she did not have any employee files on any of the Registered Dieticians who had worked in the facility during the past year. On 9/16/19 at approximately 10:50 A.M., an interview was conducted with the facility Administrator (Employee A). He stated that he did not know how many Registered Dieticians had been employed at the facility during the past year. employee information records on any of the Registered Dieticians who had worked at the facility during the past year. He stated that the facility utilized the services of an outside agency to provide Registered Dieticians. On 9/16/19 at 5:50 P.M., the Administrator stated that the employee files were just received via fax from the agency. He confirmed that the information on the Registered Dieticians had not been documented and on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility record review, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to handle linen and facility equipment in a manner to prevent the spread of infection for 2 Residents (Resident #104, Resident #31) in a survey sample of 42 Residents. The findings included: 1 For Resident #104 facility staff failed to handle soiled/blood tinged linen in a manner to prevent the spread of infection. Resident #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a most recent readmission on [DATE]. Resident #104's diagnoses included but were not limited to: unspecified convulsions, muscle weakness, chronic pain, and type 2 diabetes. Resident #104's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/5/19 was coded as an annual assessment. Resident #104 was coded as having had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact. The Resident was also coded as requiring extensive assistance of staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-17 · tag F0920 — pattern
    Provide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed, for 1 resident (Resident #28), in the survey sample of 42 residents, to provide access to a dining room for his meals. The Findings included: For Resident #28, the facility staff failed to provide access to a dining room for his meals, confining him to his room. Resident #28 was a [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #28's diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Muscle Weakness, and Hypertension. The Minimum Data Set, which was an admission Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 4/22/19 was reviewed. Resident #28 was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. He was also coded as requiring set up assistance with meals, and being able to ambulate independently with his wheelchair. On 9/15/19 at 12:45 P.M. a tour was conducted of the facility. There were no residents in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain dignity for 3 residents (Resident #31, Resident #87, Resident #70) in a sample size of 42 residents. The findings include: 1. For Resident #31, the facility staff observed he had food on his face, however, the facility staff failed to assist him clean his face promptly. In addition, the facility staff left Resident #31's pants down while in bed. Resident #31, a [AGE] year old male, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to dementia, dysphagia, and diabetes. Resident #31's most recent Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/15/2019 was coded as a quarterly assessment. Functional status for eating was coded as requiring a one-person physical assist and supervision (oversight, encouragement, or cueing) during meals. Personal hygiene was coded as total dependence on staff. On 09/16/2019 at approximately 5:05 PM, Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-17 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to assess, to determine if a Resident was safe to self administer medications, for one Resident (Resident #104) in a survey sample of 42 Residents. The findings included: Resident #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a most recent readmission on [DATE]. Resident #104's diagnoses included but were not limited to: unspecified convulsions, muscle weakness, chronic pain, and type 2 diabetes. Resident #104's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/5/19 was coded as an annual assessment. Resident #104 was coded as having had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact. The Resident was also coded as requiring extensive assistance of staff with dressing, eating, personal hygiene, bed mobility and toileting. For bathing, Resident #104 was totally dependent upon staff. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, Resident interview, the facility staff failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for 1 Resident (#30) in survey sample of 42 Residents. The findings included; For Resident #30 the facility staff failed to accommodate the residents's needs as evidenced by failure to provide an operational hospital bed. Resident #30's most recent re-admission to the facility was on 2/12/19. The Resident's diagnoses included but were not limited to: end stage renal disease and hyperlipidemia. Resident #30's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/17/19 was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #30 was not assessed for cognitive functioning on this assessment. Resident #30 was coded as being independent with dressing, eating and bathing. He was also coded as having had required supervision of one staff person for transfers, toileting and personal hygiene. On 9/15/19 at 12:50 PM, during an interview with Resident #30, the Resident stated this his bed did not work, and had not worked for 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-17 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed for one Resident (Resident #28) in a survey sample of 42 residents, to facilitate a preference to interact with community members who live in the facility by sharing a community dining experience due to the dining room was closed for breakfast, lunch and dinner on the weekends The findings included; Resident #28 was a [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #28's diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Muscle Weakness, and Hypertension. The Minimum Data Set, which was an admission Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 4/22/19 was reviewed. Resident #28 was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. He was also coded as requiring set up assistance with meals, and being able to ambulate independently with his wheelchair. On 9/16/19 a review was conducted of Resident #28's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-17 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure correct completion of the Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage, for 1 Resident (#71) in a survey sample of 42 Residents. The findings include: The facility failed to ensure Resident #50 was given a choice and checked the one of three options box on the ABN form. On 9/17/19 at approximately 4:30 PM the business office manager was given the names of the client records for ABN notices to pull. She returned with Resident #50's ABN notice dated 6/7/19. Page 1 had Resident # 50's name and Effective Date Coverage of Your Current Skilled Nursing Facility Services Will End: 6/10/19. (Patient number was left blank) Page 2 read If you miss the deadline to request an immediate appeal you may have other appeal rights: If you have original Medicare call [NAME] listed on page 1. If you belong to a Medicare health plan call your plan at the number given below: (Space left blank) Additional information optional: Telephone Notification:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility staff failed for 1 resident (resident #67) of 42 resident and for 2 of 61 resident rooms to provide a clean, comfortable, home-like environment. The findings include: For Resident #67 the facility staff failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment for a visually impaired resident, as evidenced by a broken cabinet with 2 drawer faces/covers missing. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The diagnoses for Resident #67 included but were not limited to: blindness, dementia, difficulty walking, and major depressive disorder. On 9/15/19 at approximately 12:40 PM, during an interview with Resident #67 it was observed that his bedside table had 2 drawers with the faces/covers missing. The drawer covers were observed propped beside the cabinet. Resident #67 is visually impaired but was asked how long it has been broken and he stated not too long. On 9/16/19 at 5:03 PM the maintenance director was asked if he was aware of or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation the facility staff failed to report allegations of abuse, and neglect, to the state agency timely for one resident (Residents #38) of 42 residents in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. For Resident #38, the facility staff failed to notify the state agency timely. Resident #38 was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: hypertension, anemia, contractures of the right and left knees, dementia without behavioral disturbances, quadriplegia, peripheral vascular disease, gastrostomy tube for feeding, and high cholesterol. The closest Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment to the time period associated with the event that injured Resident #38, was a significant change assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3-18-19. Resident #38 was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 0 indicating severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-17 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to complete a significant change MDS (minimum data set) assessment (SCSA) within 14 days of a significant change for one Resident (Resident #37) in a survey sample of the 42 Residents. The findings included; For Resident #37, the facility staff failed to complete a SCSA after significant weight loss, with pressure sore formation occurring from 7-3-19 to 9-2-19. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: hypertension, anemia, arthritis, chronic kidney disease moderate, high cholesterol, heart disease, seizures, and a history of dysphagia. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was a quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9-9-19. This assessment had a seven day look back period to obtain data about the Resident's current clinical condition from 9-3-19 to 9-9-19. At this time the Resident's significant weight loss…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to accurately code an MDS (minimum data set) assessment for two Residents (Resident #109, Resident #30) in a survey sample of 42 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #109 the facility staff failed to assess the Resident's cognitive functioning. Resident #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission date of 7/1/19. Resident #109's diagnoses included but were not limited to: Hypertension, diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, end stage renal disease and altered mental status. Resident #109's most recent MDS assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/25/19 was coded as an admission assessment. Resident #109 had not been assessed for cognitive skills and daily decision making on this assessment. The Resident was coded as being totally dependent upon staff for transfers, toilet use, personal hygiene and bathing. Review of Resident #109's MDS with an ARD of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for one resident (Resident #78) in a sample size of 42 residents. The findings include: 1. For Resident #78, the facility staff failed to implement her care plan for dressing changes to her peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) for intravenous access (IV). Resident #78, a [AGE] year old female, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for IV (intravenous) antibiotic treatment and wound care following recent abdominal surgery. Her diagnoses included, but are not limited to sepsis. On 9/15/2019 at approximately 1:10 PM, Resident #78 was interviewed and stated that she was getting IV (intravenous) antibiotics and wound care for a couple of weeks and she would be returning home. A double lumen PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter/line with two access ports) covered with a semipermeable dressing at the insertion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards for one Resident (Resident #122 ) in a survey of 22 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #122 the facility staff documented administration of medication which had been left at the bedside for the Resident to self administer, and was not taken. Resident #122 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a recent readmission date of 4/15/19. Resident #122's diagnoses included but were not limited to: encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, muscle weakness, restlessness and agitation, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and age-related cognitive decline. Resident #122's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/10/19 was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #122 was coded as having had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 12, which indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-17 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure a discharge summary was written after discharge on [DATE] for one resident (Resident #108) in a survey sample of 42 residents. The findings include: Resident #108 was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of but not limited to: Gastrostomy, contracture, history of traumatic brain injury, tracheostomy, pressure ulcer of sacral region, flaccid hemiplegia, Diabetes, Pneumonia and Hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was a Quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/15/2018. Under Section B 0100, the MDS coded Resident # 108 with being Comatose with Persistent vegetative state. The assessment also coded Resident # 108 as requiring total assistance of two staff persons with activities of daily living; and frequently incontinent of bowel and always incontinent of bladder. Review of the electronic clinical record and paper clinical record was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-17 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, facility record review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident received assistive devices for vision for one Resident (Resident #54) in a survey sample of 42 Residents. The findings included: Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #54 included, but were not limited to: complete traumatic amputation at level between knee and ankle, right lower leg, peripheral vascular disease, and type 2 diabetes. Resident #54's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/16/19 was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #54 was coded as having had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact. Resident #54 was coded as having required extensive assistance of 2 staff persons for transfers, dressing, personal hygiene and toileting. During an interview with Resident #54 on 9/15/19, it was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to administer physician ordered enteral feeding and water flushes for one resident (#101) in a survey sample of 42 residents. The Findings included: For Resident #101, the facility staff failed to provide physician ordered PEG tube water flushes, and tube feeding. Resident #101 is a [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #101's diagnoses include Pancreatitis, Atrial Fibrillation, Muscle Weakness, and Major Depressive Disorder. The Minimum Data Set, which was a Quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 9/5/19 was reviewed. Resident #101 was coded as having a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #101's signed physician order read: 8/1/19. Enteral Feed Order every shift Flush PEG tube with 30 ml H 2 O before and after each med pass. According to the Medication Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility record review, the facility staff failed to administer respiratory treatments as ordered by a physician for one Resident (Resident #13) in a survey sample of 42 residents. The findings included; For Resident # 13 the facility staff failed to remain with Resident during nebulizer treatment. Resident #13, an [AGE] year old woman admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to hypertension, Dementia, abnormalities of heart beat, difficulty walking, Anxiety disorder, type 2 diabetes, GERD. Pacemaker, glaucoma, and arthritis. Resident #90's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with and ARD (Assessment Reference Date) 6/28/19 coded as a Quarterly Assessment has Resident #90 listed as having a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 12 indicating moderate impairment. Resident #13 is coded as requiring supervision and over site with 1 person physical assistance for bed mobility and dressing, transfers, meals,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-17 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility failed to ensure received behavioral health services for 1 Resident (#71) in a survey sample of 42 Residents. The findings included: For Resident # 71 the facility staff failed to ensure Resident received behavioral health services for increasing behavioral issues. Resident #71, a [AGE] year old woman admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to Cerebral Infarction (Stroke), Dysphagia, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, muscle weakness, Hemiplegia (one sided weakness) and Hemiparesis (one sided paralysis) following CVA, Congenital malformations unspecified. Resident is listed as her own Responsible Party (RP). Resident #71's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with and ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 8/21/19 coded Resident #71 as having a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. She is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for 1 resident (Resident #108) in a survey sample of 42 residents. The findings included; For Resident # 108, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration as ordered by the physician. Resident #108 was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of but not limited to: Gastrostomy, contracture, history of traumatic brain injury, tracheostomy, pressure ulcer of sacral region, flaccid hemiplegia, Diabetes, Pneumonia and Hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was a Quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/15/2018. Under Section B 0100, the MDS coded Resident # 108 with being Comatose with Persistent vegetative state. The assessment also coded Resident # 108 as requiring total assistance of two staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility failed to ensure Residents are free from unnecessary medications for 1 Resident (#71) in a survey sample of 42 Residents. The findings included: Resident #71, a [AGE] year old woman was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to Cerebral Infarction (Stroke), Dysphagia, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, muscle weakness, Hemiplegia (one sided weakness) and Hemiparesis (one sided paralysis) following CVA, Congenital malformations unspecified. Resident is listed as her own Responsible Party (RP). Resident #71's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with and ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 8/21/19 coded Resident #71 as having a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. She is coded as requiring extensive assistance with 2 person physical assistance needed for transfers and dressing. She is set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure resident's are free from significant medication error for 3 Residents (Resident #83, #109, and #72) in a survey sample of 42 Residents. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #83 was free from significant medication error by ensuring the Resident did not receive expired insulin. Resident #83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #83 included but were not limited to: cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, and type 1 diabetes mellitus without complications. Resident #83's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/25/19 was coded as an annual assessment. Resident #83 was coded as having had moderately impaired daily decision making. Resident #83 was also coded as being totally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-17 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure meals were tailored to the preferences of 2 residents, (Residents #37, and #54) in a survey sample of 42 residents. The findings included; 1. For Resident #37, the facility staff failed to ensure the resident received his preferred diet, which the Resident complained about repeatedly and did not want to eat. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: hypertension, anemia, arthritis, chronic kidney disease moderate, high cholesterol, heart disease, seizures, and a history of dysphagia. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was a quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9-9-19. Resident #37 was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 11 indicating mild to no cognitive impairment and the Resident required extensive assistance, to complete dependence, on staff for all activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-17 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed for 1 resident (Resident #28) in the survey sample of 42 residents, to provide meals at scheduled mealtimes. The Findings included: For Resident #28, the facility failed to provide meals at scheduled mealtimes. Resident #28 was a [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #28's diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Muscle Weakness, and Hypertension. The Minimum Data Set, which was an admission Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 4/22/19 was reviewed. Resident #28 was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. He was also coded as requiring set up assistance with meals, and being able to ambulate independently with his wheelchair. On 9/15/19 at 1:40 P.M. an interview was conducted with Resident #28 in his room. His lunch had not been served. He stated that he had been waiting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-17 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide special eating utensils for one Resident (Resident #104) in a survey sample of 42 Residents. The findings included: Resident #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a most recent readmission on [DATE]. Resident #104's diagnoses included but were not limited to: unspecified convulsions, muscle weakness, chronic pain, and type 2 diabetes. Resident #104's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/5/19 was coded as an annual assessment. Resident #104 was coded as having had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact. The Resident was also coded as requiring extensive assistance of staff with dressing, eating, personal hygiene, bed mobility and toileting. For bathing, Resident #104 was totally dependent upon staff. On 9/16/19 at approximately 9:30 AM, Resident #104 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and facility record review, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate clinical record for one Resident (Resident #108) in a survey sample of 42 residents. The findings included; For Resident # 108, the facility staff did not ensure an accurate clinical record. Resident #108 was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of but not limited to: Gastrostomy, contracture, history of traumatic brain injury, tracheostomy, pressure ulcer of sacral region, flaccid hemiplegia, Diabetes, Pneumonia and Hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was a Quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/15/2018. Under Section B 0100, the MDS coded Resident # 108 with being Comatose with Persistent vegetative state. The assessment also coded Resident # 108 as requiring total assistance of two staff persons with activities of daily living; and frequently incontinent of bowel and always incontinent of bladder. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-17 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide a functioning call bell system for 2 Resident's (Resident #30 and Resident #87) in a survey sample of 42 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #30, the facility staff failed to ensure an operating call bell. Resident #30's most recent re-admission to the facility was on 2/12/19. The Resident's diagnoses included but were not limited to: end stage renal disease and hyperlipidemia. Resident #30's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/17/19 was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #30 was not assessed for cognitive functioning on this assessment. Resident #30 was coded as being independent with dressing, eating and bathing. He was also coded as having had required supervision of one staff person for transfers, toileting and personal hygiene. On 9/15/19 at 12:50 PM, during an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-08-17 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to post in a readily accessible place, reports and any plan of corrections in effect with respect to any surveys conducted during the past 3 years for all 109 Residents residing in the facility. The facility's non-compliance has the potential to impact all Residents and their family's ability to make informed decisions with regard to knowledge of the facilities regulatory compliance history. The findings included: On 8/15/21 at 11:15 AM, upon entrance to the facility, Surveyor A observed in the lobby a notice that indicated survey/inspection reports were maintained in a binder on the outside of the Administrator's office. On 8/16/21 at 3:35 PM, Surveyor A went to the lobby and made the following observations of the contents of the survey results binder. The binder contained a survey report with a survey ending date of 6/23/20, the report did not contain the plan of correction the facility implemented to correct the identified deficiencies. In addition, the 2567's (survey reports) dated 01/18/2021, 01/25/2021,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-08-17 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to post the daily nursing staffing on 1 of the 3 days survey was conducted. This non-compliance has the potential to affect all 109 Residents residing in the facility by not allowing them and/or their representatives to have knowledge of the facility's nurse staffing levels. The findings included: On 8/15/21 at 11:15 AM, upon entrance to the facility, Surveyor A observed the daily nursing staff posting outside of the Administrator's office in the facility lobby. Further review of this document revealed that the date of the posting and data contained within was from 8/13/21. On 8/15/21 at 4:45 PM, during an end of day meeting the facility administrator and director of nursing were made aware that the daily staff posting had not been updated since 8/13/21. The facility administrator confirmed that it is to be updated daily. On 8/17/21 at 1:00 PM, Employee D (administrator in training) identified Employee K, the scheduling coordinator as the employee responsible for the daily staffing posting. On 8/17/21 at 1:23 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH 3 of 5Charleston Healthcare CenterCharleston, WV

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PC MSTR LSCO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2017
C.R. STOLTZ FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2017
C.R. STOLTZ IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2017
I. ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2017
I. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2017
R.S. WILHEIM IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2017
RONALD S WILHEIM 2012 SPOUSAL TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2017
ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2017
RRW, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2017
S.L. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2017
SKILLED HC HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2017
WILHEIM FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.OrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2017
STOLTZ, CHARLESIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2017
GROVES, DONNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
WILHEIM, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/01/2017
FLANK MGT. CO., LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2017
MOHIUDDIN, ABDULIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2017
MORRISON, CANDYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/07/2024
ODENTHAL, RICHARDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/06/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$612K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 4%Other / private 9%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $612K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$290per resident / day
operating cost
$8,822per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$282per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495252. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next