Eagle Pointe Healthcare Center
1600 27th Street, Parkersburg, WV 26101 · For profit - Corporation · 150 certified beds · (304) 485-6476 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent May 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.5% | 14.7% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.3% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.1% | 1.6% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.1% | 7.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 9.0% | 4.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.2% | 15.9% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 41.1% | 27.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.5% | 97.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.7% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.5% | 22.1% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.9% | 13.4% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.5% | 79.4% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 14.3% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.6% | 11.3% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 53.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.3%CMS range 30.9–53.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.0–15.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 53.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 35.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 3.1–13.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.81 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 114.7 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
60 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-05-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, staff interview, visitor interview and resident interview the facility failed to provide Resident #19 with a reasonable accommodation of need that suited her preference for locomotion. Resident #19 had a motorized wheelchair that she had used for ten (10) years. The facility felt she was not safe to operate it anymore and took the batteries from the chair therefore disabling it. This left the feeling depressed and trapped as she had used this chair to travel throughout the facility. She suffered psychological harm due to this. This was true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of abuse. Resident identifier: #19. Facility Census: 110. Findings included: a) Resident #19 On 05/23/23 at 3:51 PM it was brought to the attention of the survey team by a concerned visitor at the facility that Resident #19 had her motorized wheelchair batteries taken away from her several months ago and the facility would not return her batteries to her nor would they allow her to use her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-05-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, staff interview, visitor interview, and resident interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #19 was free from abuse. Resident #19 had a motorized wheelchair that she had used for ten (10) years. The facility felt she was not safe to operate it anymore and took the batteries from the chair therefore disabling it. This left the feeling depressed and trapped as she had used this chair to travel throughout the facility and attend activities. She suffered psychological harm due to this. This was true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of abuse. Resident identifier: #19. Facility Census: 110. Findings included: a) Resident #19 On 05/23/23 at 3:51 PM it was brought to the attention of the survey team by a concerned visitor at the facility that Resident #19 had her motorized wheelchair batteries taken away from her several months ago and the facility would not return her batteries to her nor would they allow her to use her motorized wheelchair for mobility. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-23 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Record review, observation, and Staff interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at a consistant time. This failed practice had the potentioal to affect a minimal number of residents residing in the long term care facility. Facility Census: 119Findings Include:Record review completed on 09/22/25 at 1:00 PM revealed the meal delivery time started at 5:00 PM on the Memory care unit an observation on 09/22/25 at 5:00 PM, the time dinner was posted to be served on Memory Care Unit, Further observations on the memory care dining room revealed residents being really agitated and restless before dinner arrived at 5:21 PM. twenty one minutes after the meal was posted to be served.An interview on 09/22/25 at 5:25 PM with an anonymous Nurse Aide Staff member stated they are normally late, and have been much later than this in the past. Confirming trays are being served past time of service posted. Record reviews completed on thirty three trayline meal service time records showed that eight (8) out of the thirty three were documented to be served at least thirty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that baking pans were stored in a sanitary manner by stacking them while still wet (wet nesting) and dishes were free from dired substances and stored clean. This practice has the potential to contaminate food-contact surfaces and cause foodborne illness. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a minimal number of residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 119 12:50 PM observed the following issues in the kitchen:Pans were being stacked this is called Wet Nesting Plates, saucers, and coffee pots were on the clean side and were still dirty1:00 PM and interview with Dietary [NAME] # 142 Confirmed the pans were stacked wet by stating ok and also confirmed the plates and coffee pots were dirty stating i'm only one person i'll take care of it.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents could exercise their right to file a grievance, including the right to file an anonymous grievance. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility Census: 108 Findings Included: a) Grievance During an observation on 07/02/25 at 12:04 PM, it was noted that grievance forms were not readily available to residents. Further investigation revealed that grievance forms were kept at the nurses' station. During an interview with Resident #83, the resident stated that she was aware of the grievance policy. Upon being asked how a grievance could be filed, the resident stated that she would ask a staff member for a grievance form. Resident stated that once completed, the grievance form could be dropped off at the Social Worker's office. During an interview with the Director of Social Services (DSS) #76, the facility's designated grievance officer, she stated that if it was a family grievance, they would usually come to her. However, if a resident had a grievance, she stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed for Residents #64 and Resident #2. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This failured practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #2 and #64. Facility Census: 108. Findings included: a) Menus On 06/30/25 at 12:45 PM, Resident #2 was served a hot dog on a flat piece of bread with no condiments. The resident tray card stated, ALL BEEF HOT DOG on a BUN - 1 SANDWICH Mustard - 1 PKT. (packet). Nursing Assistant (NA) #22 reported the resident eats a hot dog almost every day. NA #22 confirmed the hot dog was on a piece of sandwich bread and resident was not given a condiment. During an observation of lunch service on 06/30/25 at approximately 1:11 PM, Resident #64 was unhappy with the meal served to him. He stated that he had ordered a hot dog. He received a hot dog placed on a slice of bread and cheese. He asked the person serving him, Where is the hot dog bun? The aide stated that they had run…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing temperature. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This failure had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 108. Findings included: a) Food temperatures On 07/07/2025 at 01:15 PM, a lunch tray was tested by Regional Dietary Manager #151. This test tray was the last tray to be served on D Hall. The trays were on the hall at 01:05 PM. The following temperatures were obtained: -Bruschetta chicken - 125.1 degrees Fahrenheit -Buttered noodles - 112.0 degrees Fahrenheit -Broccoli - 102.9 degrees Fahrenheit The Regional Dietary Manager #151 confirmed the temperatures for the buttered noodles and broccoli were below the standard.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of resident's. Facility Census: 108. Findings included: a) Food Storage The facility's policy and procedure for Food Storage: Dry Foods stated, 6. Storage areas will be neat, arranged for easy identification, and date marked as appropriate. The facility's policy and procedure for Food Storage: Cold Foods stated, 5. All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. On 06/30/25 at 11:10 AM during the Kitchen Investigation, the following items were found: -Three pitchers of drinks in the dining room, judged to be punch, lemonade and tea were not labeled or dated and not on ice. -No lock on employee refrigerator in the Main Dining Room. -Sysco Dry Milk - opened with no opened date. -Mission Flour…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-08 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility record review and interview, the facility failed to explain the Binding Arbitration Agreement accurately and in a form and manner residents or Resident Representatives could understand. This had the potential to affect all residents or Residents Representatives that sign a Binding Arbitration Agreement. Facility Censes: 108. Findings included: a) Binding Arbitration Agreement A facility record review of the found 81 Residents or Resident Representatives signed and accepted the Binding Arbitration Agreement. 15 Residents or Residents Representatives signed and declined the Binding Arbitration Agreement. During an interview, on 07/01/25 at 1:18 PM, the Back-Up admission Coordinator was unable to explain the Binding Arbitration Agreement accurately. She stated that she was unsure who chose the Arbitrators and that the Resident or Representatives could take their issues to a court of law if they did not like the outcome of the Arbitration. When the admission Coordinator was asked questions about the Binding Arbitration Agreement, she was unable to explain. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-08 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation, staff interview and Operation Policy, the facility failed to have a certified Infection Preventionist (IP) attend and participate in the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings that worked at least part time in the facility and have all members attend, This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. Facility Census: 108. Findings included: Record review of the facility's policy titled, QAPI Quality Assurance performance Improvement Plan (QAPI), with effective date 10/01/2017, found: - The QAPI committee will include the: Executive Director, Director of Nursing, Medical Director, Infection Preventionist, three other staff members and other state required attendees. -Monthly the QAPI committee will meet with all members of the committee present and review any open performance improvement plans, facility audits, or data collected since the last meeting. a) QAA Record review of the facility's documentation of QAA Meeting Agenda and Minutes revealed no IP attended the meeting from the October 2024 -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the required Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form to one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for the facility's beneficiary protection notification practice during an annual survey. This failure placed residents at risk of not being informed of their rights prior to the end of Medicare Part A covered services. Resident identifier: #371. Facility census: 108.Findings Included:a) Resident #371A facility record review revealed the following details: -Resident #371 was discharged following the end of their Medicare Part A Skilled -On the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Discharge assessment for Resident #371, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of May 22, 2025, Section A (Identification Information) was marked Planned.-There was no evidence that a NOMNC had been issued to the resident prior skilled services ending. During an interview on 07/01/25 at 12:42 PM, the Social Worker Designee #82 verified the NOMNC was not given to Resident #371 or their representative.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, the Facility failed to ensure that resident was free from physical restraints that unnecessarily inhibited resident's freedom of movement or activity. Resident Identifier: #4. Facility Census: 108 Findings Included: a) Resident #4 During an interview on 07/01/25, at approximately 9:30 AM, the resident stated that she was not allowed to use her wheelchair. Resident #4 indicated a wheelchair parked near her bed and said, That is my wheelchair, and I don't know why they won't allow me to use it. The resident also mentioned that she used to move around in her chair before coming to the facility. The resident mentioned that the facility would not allow her to use her wheelchair, so she requested an alternative chair. She stated that the Director of Physical Therapy (#155) provided her with another chair. The resident pointed to a Broda chair in the room and said, I can't move that chair because my feet don't work. The resident expressed the importance of being able to move in her wheelchair using her arms, as she is unable to stand or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update the care plan to reflect a change in diet status. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #82. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Inaccurate Care Plan Resident #82's diet order stated, NPO Diet, NPO texture, NPO consistency for Diet type. The resident's care plan stated: 1) Lid on coffee/hot beverage Date initiated: 06/09/2025 2) Staff to offer nutrition/hydration during checks Date initiated 03/07/2023 3) Patient may be fed pureed foods by caregivers or family as snacks are requested Date initiated 07/06/2023 On 07/01/2025 at 02:30 PM, the Director of Nursing confirmed the inaccurate care plan and stated, She hasn't eaten anything. Corporate Registered Nurse #153 stated, We have a care plan problem.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure patient centered rehabilitative services were provided for Resident #82. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #82. Facility Census: 108. Findings included: a) Resident #82 Resident #82 had four (4) plus rehospitalizations per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and was initially admitted on [DATE]. Speech Therapy (ST) had not screened the patient during her facility stay or upon re-admission to the facility for changes in condition following a hospitalization. The Director of Rehabilitation Services (DOR) stated, Occupational Therapy (OT) and Physical Therapy (PT) usually come from the hospital with orders and the ST need identified by nursing or other therapies. The DOR stated he didn't have speech in the building for awhile. However, interdisciplinary screens had been completed with no ST recommendations by PT and OT. The facility's screening policy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that the medical record was complete for a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form with no signature for Resident #87. This failed practice was true for one (1) of 28 residents reviewed in the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifier: #87. Facility Census: 108. Findings included: a) Resident #87 On 06/30/25 at 09:02 PM, Resident #87's POST form was reviewed by the state surveyor. Verbal Consent was given on 04/16/2025 by the resident's legal representative, however a signed consent was not obtained by the facility. There was no evidence in the medical record to reveal the facility had attempted to follow-up with resident's legal representative to obtain a written signature. On 07/01/2025 at approximately 11:35 AM, the Interim Director of Nursing stated that they were mailing out the POST form today to be signed.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that staff adhered to infection control protocols while caring for residents classified as requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Staff failed to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) as specified by the EBP guidelines posted outside the resident's room. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #105. Facility Census: 108. Findings Included: a) Resident #105 During an interview on 07/01/25 at approximately 9:40 AM, the resident stated that she had a Foley catheter. Resident was alert, oriented, and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8. She stated that she had the catheter because she did not have control of her bladder. The resident was under Enhanced [NAME] Precautions, and the notice posted outside Resident #105's room stated the following: ENHANCED BARRIER PRECAUTIONS EVERYONE MUST: -Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room PROVIDERS AND…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain bed remote controls in a safe operating condition. This is true for one (1) of five (5) resident beds reviewed. Facility census:108. Findings included: a) room [ROOM NUMBER]B During an interview on 07/01/25 at approximately 2:55 PM, Employee #32. was asked if they were aware of any issues with any exposed electrical wiring. The employee replied, You mean like bed remotes? Yes. One is located in room [ROOM NUMBER]B. On 07/01/25 at approximately 3:10 PM, Surveyor observed electrical tape on the bed control remote on resident bed 123B. On 07/02/25 at approximately 7:53 AM, an interview with the facility Maintenance Director verified that the bed control remote for bed 123 B had electrical tape on the remote. This finding was also acknowledged by the Administrator upon exit on 07/08/25 at approximately 1:00 PM.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and Interviews, the facility failed to ensure that resident's rooms and common areas were maintained at a comfortable temperature. Resident Room Identifiers: room [ROOM NUMBER], #205 and TV room. Facility Census: 109. Findings included: During a walk-through of the locked Alzheimer's unit on 11/19/24 at approximately 9:30 AM, Resident #35 in room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed on his bed, tightly bundled up in a blanket. Investigation revealed the P-tac unit was set to 67 degrees Fahrenheit. Resident did not respond to questions. Further observation revealed that the P-tac unit in room [ROOM NUMBER] was set to 65 degrees Fahrenheit. During an interview with the Director of Plant Maintenance (DPM) #30 at approximately 9:45 AM, a temperature check was requested. The DPM used an ambient air thermometer to check the temperature of room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]. The DPM confirmed that the ambient air temperature of room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to be approximately 67 degrees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility delayed necessary medical treatment, potentially impacting a resident's health and safety, by failing to address the resident's ongoing complaints of shortness of breath, progressive weight gain, and increasing edema over a period of two weeks. Resident Identifier: Resident #115. Facility Census:109. Findings included: a) Resident #115 A closed record review of Resident #115's records was performed on 11/18/24 at approximately 11:15 AM. Record review revealed that Resident #115 was (age and gender) diagnosed with Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), seizures, and hypertension. During the record review, the facility did not notify the physician of the resident's weight gain of over 12 pounds in two months. Additionally, the facility failed to obtain orders from the physician to address this weight gain. Furthermore, the facility did not inform the physician about the resident's +3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, a resident's necessary medical treatment was delayed due to a lack of ongoing clinical assessment and identification of changes in condition by the facility. This failure resulted in the resident being admitted to the hospital for edema and congestive heart failure. Resident Identifier: Resident #115. Facility Census: 109. Findings included: a) Resident #115 A closed record review of Resident #115's records was performed on 11/18/24 at approximately 11:15 AM. Record review revealed that Resident #115 was a (age and gender) diagnosed with Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), seizures, and hypertension. Record review on 11/19/24 at approximately 10:00 AM revealed a nursing note dated 10/26/224 at 2:48 PM by LPN #130, which stated: Resident sitting in WC in room at this time. Resident feet/ankles/legs have edema, pitting 3+. Resident is noted to be on 80mg of Lasix and can't to drink several drinks…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and observation the facility failed to provide palatable, attractive, and appetizing food. This has the potential to affect all residents that get their nutrition from the kitchen. Facility census: 109. Findings included: a) Meals During a complaint investigation for Residents not being served nutritious and palatable meals found Resident Council Minutes: June 2024 - Concerning the meat is tough, residents not receiving substitutions and eggs not being cooked correctly. No response noted. - Meals do not match the menu. Response We are working to have more consistent offering. We are good as long as the meal matches the tray ticket. August 2024 - Meals are late. Response from the Administrator that meals will be late for various reasons. He encouraged the residents to ask for a snack. October 2024 - Rolls were flat and potatoes were cold. Response education to on temperature of food and presentation of food was given to dietary staff. - Meals are coming late. No response…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and observation the facility failed to provide palatable, attractive, and appetizing food at a scheduled time. This has the potential to affect all residents that get their nutrition from the kitchen. Facility census: 109. Findings included: a) Meal times During a complaint investigation for Residents not being served meals on time meals found Resident Council Minutes: August 2024 -Meals are late. Response from the Administrator that meals will be late for various reasons. He encouraged the residents to ask for a snack. October 2024 -Rolls were flat and potatoes were cold. Response education to on temperature of food and presentation of food was given to dietary staff. - Meals are coming late. No response at this time. Review of grievance forms found: -06/10/24 - Time of meals are usually late, meat, fish and eggs are over cooked and tough. Resolution- Posted mealtimes are times meal starting to be served but not all floors /residents/ can receive meals at exact times. Staff educated on keeping meals on schedule. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they promoted and facilitated resident self determination by failing to assist with transportation to the resident's primary care physician (PCP). Resident identifier: #115. Facility Census:109 Findings included: a) Resident #115 Resident #115 was no longer at the facility. Record review revealed that Resident #115 had been diagnosed with Seizures, Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Hypertension (HTN), Hypothyroidism, and Hyperlipidemia. Further record review on 11/19/24 at approximately 10:00 AM revealed that resident had ongoing complaints of shortness of breath, and pain as evidenced by the following progress notes: A nursing note dated 10/26/224 at 2:48 PM by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #130, stated: Resident sitting in WC in room at this time. Resident feet/ankles/legs have edema, pitting 3+. Resident is noted to be on 80 mg of Lasix and can't to drink several drinks at a time as well as not elevating feet throughout the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care/treatment services in accordance with professional standards of practice. Daily weights were not obtained for Resident #9's cardiac care as directed by the physician. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #9. Facility Census: 112. Findings Included: a) Resident #9 A review of the facility policy titled Resident Height and Weights with no effective or revision date read as follows. .5. Weight Procedure: .c) Compare weight to previous weight obtained. If a variance of 5(five) pounds or more is noted, reweigh resident to verify weight. .9. Reweigh Parameters: a) A plus/minus of 5 (five) pounds of weight in one (1) week will result in: i) Reweigh within 24 hours (1) Validation with nurse for accurate weight (2) Notify IDT(Interdisciplinary Team)/doctor/family, if indicated. Record review revealed a Physician order, dated 01/17/24, for weight every day. Call (local Cardiology) with weight gain of 3 (three) lbs (pounds) in a day or 5 (five) lbs in a week. During a record review on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nutritional adequacy by providing inconsistent portions of the food to maintain perimeters of health. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents currently receiving nourishment from the facility's kitchen. Facility Census:112. Findings Included: a) Inconsistent Portions During a tour of the kitchen on 02/05/24 beginning at 11:06 AM with the Culinary Director (CD)revealed the following issue: The Diet Guide Sheet directed to use the following serving scoops for the noon meal: Ground Pork Roast #10 Pureed Pork Roast #8 Seasoned Greens ½ (half) cup Seasoned Greens pureed #10 Rice Pilaf ½ cup Rice Pilaf pureed #8 A review of the disher and scoop size chart, reads as follows: #8 Grey 4 ounces (oz) #10 Cream 3.25 oz #16 Blue 2 oz During an observation on 02/05/24 at 12:10 PM of the noon meal being served from the steam table, [NAME] #118 had a blue scoop for pureed greens, which needed to be a cream colored scoop for 3.25 oz. Cook #118 was dispensing the greens by one (1) scoop and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at an accurate temperature. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility Census:112. Findings Included: a) Point of Service During a tour of the Cottage Unit on 02/05/24 at 1:30 PM, the noon meal trays had not arrived on the unit. An immediate interview with the Resident Service Director # 7 stated the noon meal trays usually arrive at 1:00 PM. The noon meal trays arrived on the Cottage unit at 1:43 PM, the staff began serving immediately. At 1:45 PM, the Dietary department was asked to bring a thermometer to take the temperature of the food being served. At the point of service the temperatures were obtained at 1:50 PM, by the Culinary Director (CD) using the facility's thermometer -Pork Roast 80 degrees -Rice 80 degrees -Greens 78 degrees During an immediate interview the CD acknowledged the temperatures were not acceptable. This surveyor heard some residents state, this meat is too tough to cut, I can't eat this.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-06 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, staff interview and Resident interviews the facility failed to provide Residents with evening snacks. This is true for three (3) of three (3) diabetic Residents reviewed. Resident identifiers: Resident #16, Resident #9 and Resident #11. Facility Census:112. Findings Included: a) Resident #16 During an interview on 02/05/24 at 8:30 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #130 stated the kitchen brings some snacks like ice cream, crackers between 8-9:00, they put them in the nourishment room. The resident has to request them, we don't offer a snack to every resident. During a interview on 02/05/24 at 8:45 PM Nurse Aide (NA) #11 stated we have snacks in the nourishment room sometimes like pudding or applesauce. We don't have a cart full of snacks for each Resident to choose from at night. If the Residents ask for something we can try to find them something. During an interview on 02/05/24 at 8:56 PM, Resident #16 stated, The food sucks here. It is always cold, I mean cold, cold. We had fish again tonight. We just had it Friday and then again tonight it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure foods were stored and prepared in a safe, clean and sanitized environment. The facility also failed to keep the kitchen equipment clean and sanitized. The facility failed to ensure hot foods were held at 135.0 degrees Fahrenheit or higher on the steam table. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents that receive nutrients from the kitchen. Facility Census:112. Finding Included: A review of the facility policy titled Environment with a revision date of 09/17 read sas follows. Procedures: 1. The Dining Services Director will ensure that the kitchen is maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, including floors, walls, ceilings and ventilation. .4. The Dining Service Director will ensure that a routine cleaning schedule is in place for all cooking equipment, food storage areas and surfaces A review of another of the facility policy titled Equipment read as follows. Procedures: 1. All equipment will be routinely cleaned and maintained in accordance with manufacturer's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #3 received an adequate amount of nutrition to maintain acceptable parameters of nutrition via feeding tube. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for nutrition from feeding tubes. Resident identifier #3. Facility census 114. Findings included: a) Resident #3 A medical record review for Resident #3 revealed a dietary progress note from 7/21/2023: Note Text: Resident continues to be NPO with all needs met via feeding tube. Current Body Weight (CBW) 157# on 07/05/23. +4.2%x 30 d, +7.2% x 90 d and +9.5% x 180 d. Body Mass Index =marginal obesity. Further weight gain is not desired. Will await next weight to ensure gain is valid. Continued Record review of Resident #3's weights revealed: 9/7/2023 10:09 AM 164.4 pounds Mechanical Lift 9/5/2023 8:03 AM 160.6 pounds Mechanical Lift 8/1/2023 11:17 AM 153.2 pounds Mechanical Lift 7/5/2023 10:28 AM 157.0 pounds Mechanical Lift 6/1/2023 3:28 PM 150.6 pounds Mechanical Lift 5/3/2023 12:49 PM 152.0 pounds Mechanical Lift Continued…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to conduct testing of staff and residents for COVID-19 in accordance with national standards, to prevent spreading of COVID-19. This was discovered during the completion of the Infection Control Task during the Long-Term Care Survey. This failed practice has the potential to affect all residents currently residing in the facility. Facility Census: 110. Findings included: a) Center of Disease Control CDC A review of the CDC guidelines related COVID 19 testing during an outbreak found the following pertinent information: Negative tests should be repeated in 48-hour intervals, on Day 3 and Day 5 post-exposure. CDC also recommends a series of 3 tests for individuals newly admitted or readmitted to the nursing home in areas where community transmission rates are high. Testing Due to Exposure A series of 3 tests is recommended for individuals in healthcare settings (residents/patients and staff) following SARS-CoV-2 exposure, regardless of the individual's vaccination status. Asymptomatic residents/patients who have had close…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to uphold a resident's right to privacy by requiring residents to open their packages in front of staff. This was discovered during the resident council meeting and has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census 110. Findings Included: a) Resident Council Meeting A Resident Council Meeting was held on 05/24/23 at 10:00 AM. During the Resident Council Meeting, the residents were asked if they receive their mail unopened and on Saturdays? All attendees reported they must open packages in front of staff. The members present at the resident council meeting confirmed it was all residents and all packages they receive. b) Staff Interviews On 05/24/23 at 11:10 AM, a staff interview with the Activities Leader (AL) #17 was conducted. The surveyor asked AL #17 what the process for resident mail delivery was. AL #17 responded that the activities department is responsible for delivering the residents' mail to them. The surveyor asked if they open the mail. AL #17 said they do not open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide a safe, clean comfortable homelike environment. Window blinds in resident rooms were not in good repair. The facility also failed to provide adequate and comfortable lighting levels in the dining area. These were random opportunities for discovery which have the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents who currently reside in the facility. Room identifiers: The Main Dining Room, room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]. Facility Census: 110 Findings included: a) Main Dining Room During a dining room observation, on 05/23/23 at 11:45 AM, the Main Dining Room had inadequate lighting, several light bulbs were not working making the room dimly lit. During an interview, on 05/23/23 at 11:58 AM, the Executive Director acknowledged the light bulbs were not working properly and several needed to be replaced. b) room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] An initial tour of the Memory Unit on 05/22/23 at 12:50 PM, revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews, and resident interviews, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the category of abuse, for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for the category of dignity, and for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for the category of prompt resolution of grievances, during the long term care survey. Resident identifiers: #97, #75, #220, and #24. Facility Census: 110. Findings included: a) Abuse Policy Communicare's Policies and Standard Procedures for WEST VIRGINIA Abuse, Neglect & Misappropriation, Policy #: NS 1018-03, page five (5) of 20, defines, .Verbal Abuse includes the use of oral, written, or gestured communication, or sounds, to residents within hearing distance, regardless of age, ability to comprehend, or disability. (Examples of mental and verbal abuse include, but are not limited to, harassing a resident; mocking, insulting, ridiculing; yelling or hovering over a resident, with the intent to intimidate; threatening residents, including, but not limited to, depriving a resident of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews, and resident interviews, the facility failed to immediately report abuse allegations for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the category of abuse, for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for the category of dignity, and for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for the category of prompt resolution of grievances, during the long term care survey. Resident identifier #97, #75, #220, and #24. Census 110. Findings Included: a) Resident #97 During a resident interview with Resident #12, on 05/22/23 at 1:10 PM, Resident #12 stated her roommate, Resident #97, was verbally abused by an aide named (Nursing Assistant #75 name) one day last week. Resident #12 said she reported this to her roommate's daughter and to staff member (name of #152) who said she would report it. The surveyor asked Resident #12 what did the Nursing Assistant (NA) do that was perceived as abusive and she replied the NA was rude and gruff, had an attitude, when taking her roommate to the restroom. When Resident #97 was interviewed she stated she does not remember…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews, and resident interviews, the facility failed to prevent further abuse by allowing alleged perpetrator to continue working after obtaining knowledge of an allegation of abuse and failed to complete a thorough investigation for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the category of abuse during the long-term care survey. Resident identifier #97. Facility Census: 110. Findings included: a) Resident #97 During a resident interview with Resident #12, on 05/22/23 at 1:10 PM, Resident #12 stated her roommate, Resident #97, was verbally abused by an aide named (Nursing Assistant #75 name) one day last week. Resident #12 said she reported this to her roommate's daughter and to staff member (name of #152) who said she would report it. The surveyor asked Resident #12 what the Nursing Assistant (NA) did that was perceived as abusive, and she replied the NA was rude and gruff, had an attitude, when taking her roommate to the restroom. When Resident #97 was interviewed she stated she does not remember anything about it. Resident #12 says NA #75 rushed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop and or implement the comprehensive care plan to meet the resident's needs. This was true for five (5) of 26 residents reviewed in the sample during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifiers: #112, #47, #51, #39 and #66. Facility Census: 110 Findings included: a) Resident #112 A record review of Resident #112's medical record on 05/30/23 at 11:34 AM , found admitting diagnosis included: -anxiety disorder -depression -bipolar disorder -Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Further review of the medical record revealed a Care Plan with an initiation date of 03/17/23 which reads as follows. Focus: The resident uses, antidepressant medication Depression, Pain Goal: Resident will be without complications of ant-depressant medication side effect, through target date. Inventions included: Encourage resident to voice feelings and discuss coping skills. During an interview on 05/30/23 at 12:53 PM the Minimum Data Set Register Nurse (MDS RN) #57 stated Resident # 112, can tell his coping skills, he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pain management was consistent with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for the care area of pain. Resident identifier: #66. Facility census: 110. Findings included: a) Resident #66 Review of Resident #66's physicians' orders showed an order for Acetaminophen (Tylenol), 325 mg tablets, two (2) tablets by mouth every six (6) hours as needed for mild pain and moderate pain. The intensity rating for mild and moderate pain was not specified in the order. Review of Resident #66's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for May 2023 showed the resident had received Acetaminophen for pain seven (7) times in May. The resident's level of pain was only assessed on two (2) occasions, 05/10/23 at 5:39 AM and 05/22/23 at 2:13 PM. The resident's level of pain was not assessed on five (5) occasions, 05/01/23 at 1:53 PM, 05/03/23 at 6:07 am, 05/07/23 at 5:47 AM, 05/17/23 at 3:56 PM, and 05/18/23 and 4:22 AM. Further review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. A multi-use tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD) vial was not dated when opened to determine when the vial should be discarded. This was a random opportunity for discovery that had the potential to affect residents receiving tuberculin PPD injections. Facility census: 110. a) Memory Unit Medication Room On 05/24/23 10:20 AM, inspection of the Memory Unit medication room was made. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #47 was in attendance. In the medication room refrigerator, an opened multi-dose vial of tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD) was noted to not have been dated when first accessed. Tuberculin purified protein derivative is given by injection to aid in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. A yellow sticker on the medication box stated to discard 30 days after first use. The vial had been delivered from the pharmacy on 4/5/23. LPN #47 confirmed the vial had not been dated when opened to determine when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. The facility failed to label and date food items which were open and failed to dispose of expired food items. The facility also failed to keep accurate temperature records. The facility also failed to keep dishes and utensils in a sanitary area, and to keep kitchen equipment clean. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents currently receiving nutrition from the facility's kitchen. Facility Census: 110 Findings Included: A review of the facility policy titled Food Storage: Cold Foods with a revision date of 04/18 read as follows. .Procedures .4. A written record of daily temperatures will be recorded. 5. All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. a) Dry Storage On 05/22/23 at 11:30 AM during the initial tour of the kitchen with the Culinary Director (CD)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure each residents medical record was complete and accurate medical records. This was true for five (5) of 26 residents reviewed in the sample during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifiers: Resident #101, Resident #47, Resident #34, Resident #51 and Resident #170. Facility Census: 110 Findings Included: a) Resident #101 A record review of Resident #101's medical record on 05/22/23 at 4:41 PM Resident #101's found a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form which indicate verbal consent was obtained from the resident's representative on 09/01/22. The consent was witnessed by two (2) staff members. However, the resident representative's actual signature was never obtained. The 2021 POST form guidance titled, Using the POST Form: Guidance for Health Care Professionals, 2021 edition, available on-line, stated, If the incapacitated patient's MPOA [medical power of attorney] representative or health care surrogate is unavailable at the time of form completion, this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating conditions. Two (2) ice machines did not have a one (1) inch air gap for drainage. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents currently receiving nutrition from the facility kitchen and the north nourishment room. Facility Census: 110 Findings Included: a) North Nourishment Room Ice Machine During the tour of the North Nourishment Room, on 05/23/23 at 9:42 AM, with the Culinary Director (CD) an observation of the ice machine water drain revealed it was touching the floor drain without a one (1) inch gap. This allowed for the potential for contaminants to enter the line and travel to the ice machine. During an interview on 05/23/23 at 12:32 PM, the Administrator stated I was not aware of the need for a one-inch gap. During an interview on 05/23/23 at 3:12 PM the Director of Plant Maintenance stated, I was not aware of the need of a one-inch gap from the drain, but it will be repaired. b) Main Dining Room Ice Machine A tour of the facility, on 05/23/23 at 10:15 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to notify the representative/family of medical changes. This was true for one (1) out of one (1) resident reviewed for the care area of notification of change during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifiers: Resident # 171. Facility census 110. Findings included: a) Resident #171 A review of the medical record for Resident #171 found the following times a change in care was made and the Power of Attorney was not notified of the changes: On 11/26/22 there was an order for Resident #171 to receive Oxygen via nasal cannula with a flow rate of 2 liters. On 11/18/22 there was an order to change the treatment for a pressure ulcer. On 11/29/22 there was an order to stop the giving Norco (a pain medication). On 05/25/23 at 10:30 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said there was not any information in the medical to prove the POA for Resident #171 was notified of the order changes listed above. .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances and keep the residents appropriately apprised of progress toward resolution for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for the category of personal property, during the long-term care survey. Resident identifier #39. Facility Census 110. Findings Included: a) Resident #39 On 05/24/23 at 10:00 AM, during the Resident Council Meeting, Resident #39 stated her phone was washed and ruined by staff last month and never replaced. Resident #39 stated she reported it to Social Worker (SW) #82 but it has not been replaced and no one has given her an update on when it will be replaced. An Electronic Medical Record (EMR) review conducted on 05/24/23 at 12:45 PM found, A progress note written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #9, dated 04/30/23 at 12:28 PM which read as follows: While resident was out of room aids went in and cleaned room and changed residents sheets, phone was in the bed sheets and went to laundry, when resident returned she didn't have her phone,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-26 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the State Ombudsman of a transfer to an acute care facility for Resident #55. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed under the care area of hospitalization. Resident identifier: #55. Facility Census: 110. Findings included: a) Resident #55 On 05/24/23 at 10:18 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #55. The record review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility on 03/24/23. The following progress note dated 03/24/23 at 5:09 AM states the following: At 0430 (4:30 AM) Resident noted to have a temperature of 101.0 (Fahrenheit). Crackles heard in lungs upon auscultation. Resident O2 SAT (oxygen saturation) @ (at) 75%. This nurse applied 2 (two) liters of oxygen. O2 SAT staying at 86-89 (percentage) on 2 (two) liters. Resident was swabbed for COVID 19 with a positive result. BP (blood pressure) 172/78. This nurse left message for (Name of Power of Attorney) @ (at) 0448 (4:48 AM). Resident sent to (Name of acute care facility) @ 0510 (5:10 AM). (Typed as written.)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-26 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a bed hold policy to the resident and/or resident representative upon transfer to an acute care facility for Resident #55. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed under the care area of hospitalization. Resident #55. Facility Census: 110. Findings Included: a) Resident #55 On 05/24/23 at 10:18 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #55. The record review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility on 03/24/23. The following progress note dated 03/24/23 at 5:09 AM states the following: At 0430 (4:30 AM) Resident noted to have a temperature of 101.0 (Fahrenheit). Crackles heard in lungs upon auscultation. Resident O2 SAT (oxygen saturation) @ (at) 75%. This nurse applied 2 (two) liters of oxygen. O2 SAT staying at 86-89 (percentage) on 2 (two) liters. Resident was swabbed for COVID 19 with a positive result. BP (blood pressure) 172/78. This nurse left message for (Name of Power of Attorney) @ (at) 0448 (4:48 AM). Resident sent to (Name of acute care facility) @…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-26 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed when the resident experienced a change in condition. Resident #93 did not have a significant change MDS assessment completed when hospice services were started. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of 26 residents reviewed in the long-term care survey sample. Resident identifier: #93. Facility census: 110. Findings included: a) Resident #93 Review of Resident #93's medical records showed the resident began receiving hospice services on 04/05/23. No significant change MDS assessment had been completed after the resident began receiving hospice services. During an interview on 05/23/23 at 3:08 PM, MDS nurse #93 confirmed Resident #93 did not have a significant change MDS assessment within 14 days of receiving hospice services. No further information was provided through the completion of the survey.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-26 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a new Pre-admission Screening (PAS) was completed to reflect the resident's new psychiatric diagnosis for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for the category of PASARR, during the long-term care survey. Resident identifier #68. Census 110. Findings included: a) Resident #68 Record review conducted on 05/22/23 at 2:08 PM, revealed a PAS dated 03/06/20 did not trigger a Level II evaluation. The record also revealed the resident received a psych diagnosis after admission but did not receive a new PAS to address whether specialized services were needed. The surveyor requested a copy of the most recent PAS from the Administrator. On 05/23/23 at 12:24 PM, a record review of the latest PAS the facility provided to surveyor, was dated for 03/06/20, (resident admitted on [DATE]), the facility completed this PAS. In the electronic record, Medical Diagnosis section, Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent, moderate dated 12/03/20, and Unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-26 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Pre-admission Screening (PAS) reflected pre-admission diagnoses for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for the category of PASARR and for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the category of mood/behavior, during the long-term care survey. Resident identifier #68 and #112. Census: 110. Findings included: a) Resident #68 Record review conducted on 05/22/23 at 2:08 PM, revealed a PAS dated 03/06/20 did not trigger a Level II evaluation. The record also revealed the resident received a psych diagnosis after admission but did not receive a new PAS to address whether specialized services were needed. The surveyor requested a copy of the most recent PAS from the Administrator. On 05/23/23 at 12:24 PM, a record review of the latest PAS the facility provided dated 03/06/20, (resident admitted on [DATE]), the facility completed this PAS. In the electronic record, Medical Diagnosis section, Major Depressive Disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, family interview, staff interview and record review the facility failed to implement an ongoing resident centered activities program designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for the care area of activities during the long-term care survey and had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Resident identifier: Resident #90. Facility Census: 110 Findings included: a) Resident #90 During the initial tour of the Memory unit on 05/22/23 at 12:49 PM the residents were observed in the dining area, while waiting on the meal, residents became restless and began wandering. The lunch meal started being served at 1:20 PM. During an interview on 05/22/23 at 1:27 PM Resident #90 medical power of attorney stated, we always come at the same time before lunch and there are no activities going on. The other residents are always just wandering around. Mom is just usually sitting there looking out the window or in her room when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #107 dental status was adequately assessed on admission to the facility. The nurse completing the resident's initial nursing assessment upon admission to the facility noted she did not assess the resident's dental status because the resident was NPO (take nothing by mouth). This was true for one (1) of 26 sampled residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: #107. Facility Census: 110. Findings included: a) Resident #107 A review of Resident #107's medical record on 05/24/23 found an admission Initial Evaluation completed by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/29/22. Under section 5. Oral status the DON in section 12a. Specify 'other' wrote, Resident NPO unable to determine.' An interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 05/24/23 at 12:04 PM confirmed, a resident being NPO does not inhibit you from being able to assess their dental status. The ADON performed an oral assessment on Resident #107 at this time and confirmed the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-26 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to ensure a resident who displays or is diagnosed with a mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty receives appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. When the facility took Resident #19's right to use her motorized wheelchair the Social Worker indicated the resident voiced she was upset by the situation. The social worker stated, I referred her to (name of psychologist) for psychotherapy to help adjust. The psychologist saw Resident #19 in 02/2023 and noted he would see her every one (1) to three (3) weeks for 12 weeks for psychotherapy. Resident #19 has not seen the psychologist since this occasion in 02/2023. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the Long Term Care Survey Process. This was true for only Resident #19. Resident Identifier: #19. Facility Census: 110. Findings Included: a) Resident #19 On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form was signed and dated by the preparer. This was found for one (1) of 19 advance directives reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey sample process. Resident identifier: #71. Facility census: 104. Findings included: a) Resident #71 A medical record review for Resident #71 on 02/21/22, revealed the POST form completed on 06/01/21 had not been signed or dated by the preparer. In an interview with the Cooperate Registered Nurse (RN) on 02/21/22 at 1:10 PM, the RN verified the POST form did not include the signature or date of the preparer. .
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-23 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolatedNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an employee hired had not been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment or misappropriation of property by a court of law. This was true for one (1) of six (6) employees reviewed during the Long-Term Survey Process. Employee Identifier #63. Facility Census: 104. Findings Included: a) Employee #63 A review of Nursing Aide (NA) # 63's employment record reveals a [NAME] Virginia Clearance for Access: Registry and Employment Screening form (WV CARES) dated 09/21/21. There was not a WV CARES Notification of Eligible Fitness Determination. In an interview on 02/22/22 at 10:45 AM, HR (Human Resources) # 52 stated, They had 90 days to get them completed. She must have missed her fingerprinting appointment. She doesn't work that much. When HR#63 was showed the date of 09/21/21 on the WV CARES form she stated there is a letter from the WV CARES that explains the exemption of finger prints. HR #52 produced the following letter dated 01/28/22 from the State of [NAME] Virginia Department of Health and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-23 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for one (1) of 19 residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: #3. Facility census: 104. Findings included: a) Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's medical records revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/22/21 which coded the resident was taking an anticoagulant for seven (7) days during the look-back period. Review of Resident #3's medical orders for that time period did not show an order for anticoagulant medication. During an interview on 02/22/22, MDS Coordinator #104 confirmed Resident #3 was not taking anticoagulant medication in November 2021 and the MDS was incorrect. No further information was provided through the completion of the survey process. .
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment in which a resident, with an indwelling catheter, receives the appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections. This was true for two (2) of three (3) Residents reviewed during the Long-Term Survey Process. Resident Identifiers #48 and #58 Facility Census 104 Findings Included: a) Facility Policy A review of the Facility Policy titled: Catheter Care Policy, with an implementation date of 11/27/17 and a revision date of 05/03/21, found the following: .1. Catheter care will be performed every shift and as needed by the nursing assistant . b) Resident #48 A review of Resident # 48's medical records found the following task that reads, Catheter / Urine output. Question four (4) of the task reads catheter care provided. A thirty day review from 01/23/22 of question four (4) found staff failed to complete required catheter care on each of the following dates per facility policy: 01/30/22, 02/02/22, 02/09/22, 02/11/22, 02/20/22, and 02/23/22. On 02/23/22 at 8:45 AM, the DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintains the resident's highest practicable level of physical, mental and psychosocial well-being and prevent or minimize adverse consequences related to medication by not maintaining an attending physician review. This was true for one (1) of five (5) Residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the Long-Term Survey Process. Resident Identifier #102 Facility Census 104 Findings Included: a)Resident #102 A review of Resident # 102's medical record reveals a Consultant Pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review dated 12/19/21 signed by Pharmacist #159 that reads . just a reminder .f/u (follow up) GDR (Gradual Dose Reduction) evaluation . The medications to be reviewed were: Olanzapine 15 mg daily for dementia with behaviors, Depakote ER 1500 mg bedtime, Klonopin 1mg BID (twice a day), Vilazodone 40 mg daily, Trazodone 50 mg daily and 150 mg bedtime. This Consultant Pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review was not signed or addressed by the facility physician. On 02/22/22 at 9:34 AM, the Administrator acknowledged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Resident #91 received an as needed (PRN) anti-anxiety medications even though they had demonstrated no target behaviors to warrant the use of the PRN medication and the facility failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions prior to administering the PRN anti-anxiety medication. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications during Long-Term Survey Process Survey (LTCSP). Resident identifier: #91. Facility census: 104. Findings include: a) Resident #91 A review of Resident #91's medical record found the following physician's orders for Ativan 0.5 milligrams (mg)- Give 1 tablet by mouth every four (4) hours as needed for anxiety. Review of Medication Administration Record (MAR) for December 2021 and January and February 2022 found Resident #91 was administered this medication on the following dates and times without evidence of non-pharmacological interventions before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. One (1) of three (3) opened insulin pens in the Memory Unit medication cart was not dated when first opened. Resident identifier: #41. Facility census: 104. Findings included: a) Memory Unit medication cart On 02/21/22 at 8:05 AM, an inspection was made of the memory unit medication cart. The Lantus SoloStar Solution Pen-injector (insulin) for Resident #41 did not have a date to indicate when the pen had first been opened. This was important to determine when the pen needed to be discarded. According to the Lantus SoloStar Solution Pen-injector package insert available on the Food and Drug Administration Website, Lantus pens should be thrown away 28 days after being opened. The insulin pen had been delivered from the pharmacy on 02/06/22. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #62 confirmed Resident #41's Lantus SoloStar Solution Pen-injector had not been dated when opened. No further information was provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a safe and sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards of practice. During the kitchen tour it was discovered a dietary aid was not wearing a beard guard while in the kitchen service area. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Facility census: 104 Findings included: a) Kitchen tour During the kitchen tour on 02/21/22 at 11:28 AM, it was discovered Dietary Aide (DA) #30 was not wearing a beard net while in the kitchen service area. During an interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 02/23/22 at 12:17 PM, the DM agreed this was not a sanitary practice for DA #30 to be in the kitchen service area without a beard net. .
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or the resident's representative has the opportunity to refuse the annual influenza vaccine. This is true for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for the influenza immunization during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #52 and #102. Facility census: 104. Findings include: a) R#52 Review of the medical record on 02/22/22, revealed R #52 received the annual influenza vaccine on 10/14/21, 10/16/20, and 10/02/19. The form titled Influenza Vaccination Informed Consent/Declination is dated 09/12/16 and signed by a health care surrogate. The medical record lacks any other consents for the influenza vaccine. The medical record was reviewed with the Infection Preventionist/Registered Nurse (IPRN) #13 on 02/23/2022. The IPRN confirmed a consent for the annual influenza vaccine was only obtained once on 09/12/16. b) Resident (R) #102 Review of the medical record on 02/22/22, revealed R #102 received the annual influenza vaccine on 10/14/21. The form titled Annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| WV LT CARE OP CO., LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2022 |
| C R STOLTZ II LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2022 |
| C.R. STOLTZ IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2022 |
| HC REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2022 |
| I. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2022 |
| OMG RE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2022 |
| R.S. WILHEIM IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2022 |
| RONALD S WILHEIM 2012 SPOUSAL TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2022 |
| ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2022 |
| RRW, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2022 |
| S.L. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2022 |
| WILHEIM FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC. | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2022 |
| ROMEO, DOMINIC | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2022 |
| STOLTZ, CHARLES | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2022 |
| WILHEIM, RONALD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 07/01/2022 |
| 27TH STREET MGT CO., LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/20/2025 |
| BIBBEE, FRANK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/23/2025 |
| GROVES, DONNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2022 |
| MONTGOMERY, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/02/2025 |
| ODENTHAL, RICHARD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/11/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515159. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.