Grande Pointe Healthcare Commu

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 161.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-12-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, self-reported incident (SRI) review, review of a police report, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #28, who had dementia, was deemed incompetent, and unable to provide consent, was free from resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for actual physical and psychosocial harm on 11/26/24 at approximately 8:20 P.M. when Resident #18, who had a history of engaging in physical activity (i.e. hand holding and touching behaviors) with Resident #28 without care planned interventions, was observed by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #396 engaged in an activity indicative of oral sex on Resident #28. This affected one resident (#28) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 158. On 12/10/24 at 4:10 P.M., the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON) and Regional Director of Clinical Operations (RDCO)/Registered Nurse (RN) #219 were notified Immediate Jeopardy began on 11/26/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of skin and wound notes, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure individualized care planned interventions were developed and followed to prevent Resident #165 from developing in-house pressure ulcers within 30 days of admission and failed to ensure the pressure ulcer was properly treated, and interventions were initiated to promote healing and to prevent Resident #165 from developing an additional full thickness wound to the left buttock from incontinence associated dermatitis. Actual Harm occurred on 09/12/24 when Resident #165, who was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, was dependent on staff for bed mobility and incontinence care, and had in-house acquired Stage III pressure ulcers (full-thickness loss of skin that extended to the subcutaneous tissue, but did not cross the fascia beneath it) on her sacral area, developed a new new full thickness (extend deeper than the skin's epidermis and dermis layers and can reach the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-06-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and effective pain management program for Resident #156, including a comprehensive pain assessment and effective interventions to timely treat the resident's pain. This affected one resident (#156) of three residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 154. Actual Harm occurred on 04/21/24 when Resident #156, who was admitted to the facility with an unstageable (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough (yellow, tan, gray, green or brown) and/or eschar (tan, brown or black) in the wound bed) pressure ulcer to the sacrum, experienced moderate to severe/unbearable pain, difficulty with seated positioning, difficulty sleeping at night and pain that interfered with therapy activities and ability to complete hemodialysis treatments due to the lack of effective pain management interventions (including the administration of pain medication). Pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, interview, review of the facility's investigation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure a resident with moderately impaired cognition did not leave the facility without staff awareness. This affected one resident (#102) of three residents reviewed for elopements. The facility census was 162. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #102 revealed an admission date of 01/20/25. Medical diagnoses included non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, anxiety, and vascular dementia without behavioral, psychotic, or mood disturbance. Review of a physician order dated 09/25/25 revealed Resident #102 was ordered a wanderguard (a wearable bracelet-like device used to monitor and prevent residents at risk for wandering…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order for a pressure ulcer treatment was transcribed into the electronic medical records. This affected one resident (#136) of three residents reviewed for physician orders. The facility census was 151.Findings include:Review of Resident #136 ' s medical record revealed an admission date of 02/04/25. Diagnoses included a stage four pressure ulcer (a full thickness wound involving muscle, tendon, and/or bone involvement) to the sacrum (tailbone area), stroke with right sided weakness, and malnutrition.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #136 had intact cognition. Resident #136 was dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, and personal hygiene. Review of the care plan dated 09/18/25 revealed Resident #136 had an actual skin impairment. Interventions included a negative pressure wound vac set at 125 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) of pressure and change the wound vac…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control techniques were used during incontinence care. This affected one resident (#136) of two residents observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 151.Findings include:Review of Resident #136's medical records revealed an admission date of 02/04/25. Diagnoses included stroke with right sided weakness, muscle weakness, and malnutrition.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #136 had intact cognition. Resident #136 was dependent on staff for toileting and was incontinent of bowel and bladder.Review of the care plan dated 09/18/25 revealed Resident #136 was dependent on staff for toileting. Interventions included to check the resident for incontinence.Observation of incontinence care on 10/20/25 at 10:57 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #255 revealed Resident #136 was incontinent of liquid stool. CNA #255 had proceeded to provide Resident #136 with incontinence…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete wound treatments as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#114) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 140. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #114 revealed an initial admission date of 08/20/24 and re-entry date of 03/18/15. The resident had been hospitalized from [DATE] to 03/18/25 for a wound infection. Diagnoses included polyosteoarthritis, dementia, adult failure to thrive, left-hand and right-hand contractures, left and right shoulder contractures, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #114 had severely impaired cognition and four venous/arterial ulcers. Review of a wound assessment report dated 03/25/25 revealed Resident #114 had a left elbow wound due to end-of-life skin failure, and arterial ulcers to the right hallux (big toe), right heel, left hallux,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely implement physician orders to insert an indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one resident (#145) of three residents reviewed for urinary tract infection (UTI) prevention. The facility census was 140.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #145 revealed an admission date of 03/20/25 and discharge date of 04/01/25. Diagnoses included orthopedic aftercare, closed fracture of the lower end of left femur, closed fracture of the lateral condyle of left femur, closed fracture of the medial condyle of left femur, fracture of the ninth and tenth thoracic vertebra, and atrial fibrillation. A diagnosis of retention of urine was added upon the date of discharge on [DATE].Review of Resident #145's undated profile sheet revealed the resident was listed as his own responsible party with two children both listed as emergency contacts.Review of the nursing progress notes from 03/20/25 to 03/24/25 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents except three residents (#68, #75, and #207) who received nothing by mouth and did not receive food from the facility's kitchen. The facility census was 147. Findings include: Observations on 03/03/25 from 10:02 A.M. to 10:23 A.M. during the tour of the kitchen with Mobile Dietary Manager (MDM) #800 revealed on a rack several white dessert plates stacked that had dried brownish, substance and crumbs on several of the plates. Observation of the oven, stove, tilt skillet, and steamer all had various food crumbs and grease on the front and the surfaces on the side of the equipment. The floor in front of the stove, oven, tilt skillet, and steamer and between the stove and the tilt skillet and the tilt skillet and the steamer were dirty with a moderate amount of dark colored debris. Interview on 03/03/25 between 10:02 A.M. and 10:23 A.M. with MDM #800 verified the identified findings and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent accidents related to smoking safety. This had the potential to affect four residents (#62, #85, #98, and #210) of four residents reviewed for smoking. The facility identified 18 current residents who smoked. The facility census was 147. Findings include: Observation on 03/10/25 at 9:15 A.M. of the resident smoke break with Activity Leader #548 revealed Resident #85 and Resident #98 were outside the building, approximately five feet from the glass exit door, smoking cigarettes. Activity Leader #548 was inside the building supervising through the glass door. Resident #210 arrived to smoke break late, and Activity Leader #548 opened the door for her to go out and smoke. Resident #210 wheeled herself out and parked her wheelchair with her back facing the glass door where Activity Leader #548 was supervising. Activity Leader #548 remained inside the building supervising through the door. Resident #85 was observed to pass his lit cigarette to Resident #210 to light her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-11 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) were provided culturally competent and trauma-informed care. This affected two residents (#81 and #82) of two residents reviewed for PTSD. The facility census was 147. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #81's medical record revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included heart disease, burns to her head, face, and neck. Other diagnoses included major depressive disorder, scar conditions and fibrosis, insomnia, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and restlessness and/or agitation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #81 had moderately impaired cognition, slight confusion regarding person, place and time. She displayed no signs or symptoms of delirium, and no behaviors were noted. PTSD was noted as an active diagnosis. Review of Resident #81's Social History…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-17 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespread
  Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel file review, interview, review of facility policies and review of the Ohio Revised Code (ORC), the facility failed to hire staff free of disqualifying offenses. This affected one out of seven personnel files reviewed and had the potential to affect all 158 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of personnel files on 12/11/24 starting at 2:20 P.M. with Employee Lifecycle Manager (ELM) #246 and Regional Employee Engagement Specialist ([NAME]) #197 revealed the following area of concern: Review of Maintenance Staff (MS) #385's personnel file revealed a date of hire of 04/28/23. MS #385 was on the Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI) log as having a background check sent on 04/27/23 and the results returning on 05/11/23 with no findings. ELM #246 and [NAME] #197 were asked to provide the background check report. Further review of MS #385's background check report dated 05/12/23 revealed charges for domestic violence (2919.25) on 12/28/95. No personal care standards were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel record review, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and procedure regarding checking potential applicants against the Ohio Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) prior to working with residents as well as completing background checks as required. This affected six out of seven personnel files reviewed and had the potential to affect all 158 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Review of personnel files on 12/11/24 starting at 2:20 P.M. with Employee Lifecycle Manager (ELM) #246 and Regional Employee Engagement Specialist ([NAME]) #197 revealed the following areas of concern: • Review of Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #365's personnel file revealed a date of hire of 11/29/23. CNA #365 was checked against the NAR on 12/19/23, after she had already been working with residents. CNA #365 was not on the facility's background check log and her file contained no envelope with background checks available for further review. • Review of Dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$137,255 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $93,152 — penalty dated 2024-12-17
• $22,425 — penalty dated 2024-09-30
• $21,678 — penalty dated 2024-06-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH