Cumberland Healthcare Center
512 Winifred Road, Cumberland, MD 21502 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 130 certified beds · (301) 724-6066 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (23% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $97,777 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-25)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.6% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.1% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 18.6% | 22.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 2.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 31.1% | 22.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 32.5% | 16.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.1% | 5.9% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.0% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.2% | 13.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.3% | 80.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.3% | 21.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.3% | 9.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.25 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.75 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 220 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.8%CMS range 46.3–61.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.6%CMS range 9.5–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 47.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 4.5–11.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 100.2 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
59 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-28 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an effective discharge planning process. This was evident for 4 (#4, #8, #9, and #10) of 5 residents reviewed for discharges. On 5/21/26 at 2:05 PM, an immediate jeopardy (IJ) was declared for the facility's failure to ensure that post-discharge services were set up for Resident #4 prior to their discharge date . An IJ summary tool was provided to the facility. The facility submitted a plan for removal at 2:10 pm that was not accepted, the second draft submitted at 3:09 pm, the third submitted at 4:05 pm and fourth submitted at 4:44 pm were not accepted. On 5/21/26 at 5:55 PM, the facility staff submitted an IJ removal plan to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) which was accepted, The IJ was removed on 5/22/26 at 3:30 PM after confirmation that the accepted plan had been fully executed. After removal of the immediacy, the deficient practice remained at a scope and severity of E. The findings include: The discharge care plan is part of the comprehensive care plan and must:Be developed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-09-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide an environment for residents which was free from abuse. The deficient practice resulted in a harm for Resident #74, #256, and #34. This was evident for 4 (Resident #74, #256, #7, and #34) of 16 residents investigated for abuse. The findings include: Dementia is not a specific disease, but is instead a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interfere with everyday activities. A care plan is a guide that addresses each resident's unique needs. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. 1) On 9/7/23 at 9:13 AM, a medical record review for Resident # 74 was conducted. The review revealed that a preadmission intake or referral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide the supervision needed to prevent resident to resident altercations which resulted in harm. This was evident for 1(#74) of 7 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: Dementia is not a specific disease, but is instead a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interfere with everyday activities. A care plan is a guide that addresses each resident's unique needs. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. A medical record review for Resident # 74 on 9/7/23 at 9:13 AM revealed a preadmission intake or referral form completed on 4/26/22 by Resident #74's previous residence that indicated that the reason for referral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure that their resident's were treated with dignity and respect. This was evident for 1 (#2) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: A medical record review for Resident #2 on 5/26/26 at 1:54 PM revealed a discharge summary from the hospital dated 1/7/26 that documented the resident had a debridement of a right heel wound. The resident was ordered Percocet 5-325 mg noted the resident was ordered to take 1 tablet of oxycodone and Tylenol combination drug commonly referred to as Percocet 5-325 mg (5 mg of oxycodone and 325 mg of Tylenol) every 4 hours for pain as needed. A progress note dated 1/7/26 at 8:37 PM documented the resident had been readmitted to the facility. On 1/8/26 at 1:11 AM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #11 wrote that the resident was upset because s/he had asked earlier for pain medication and was offered Tylenol for pain while awaiting the pharmacy to drop off Percocet. She further noted that when she took the Percocet to the resident, they became upset again…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that staff failed to provide nursing services for residents that met the standards of professional practice. This was evident during 1 random observation of nursing unit 1. The findings include: 1) On 05/19/26 at 11:04 AM Certified Nursing Assistant (Aid) #9 was observed asking Resident #14 if the resident had brought back his/her medication yet. The resident responded no and Aid #2 reassured the resident that the nurse was aware and would be back shortly. The resident was observed to be sitting up in bed, pursed lip breathing with use of accessory muscles and appeared restless. The resident was asked what s/he needed and s/he reported s/he had requested his/her inhaler because s/he was having trouble breathing. The resident reported they were unsure of the time it was requested. An interview with Aid #9 at 11:11 AM revealed about 5 minutes ago she had reported to Certified Medicine Aid #13 that the resident was asking for their inhaler because they were having trouble breathing. On 5/19/26 at 11:16 AM the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide appropriate pain management for their residents. This was evident for 1 (#2) of 1 resident reviewed for pain management. The finding include: A medical record review on 5/26/26 at 1:54 PM for Resident #2 revealed a Discharge summary dated [DATE], from the hospital, that documented the resident was taking Percocet 5-325 mg 1 tab every 4 hours as needed after a heel wound debridement procedure. According to a progress note written on 1/7/26 at 8:37 PM the resident was re-admitted to the facility. On 1/8/26 at 2:00 AM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #11 wrote a progress note that documented Resident #2 was upset and mad at the nurse because she had offered him/her Tylenol while waiting for the physician to sign off the order for Percocet. She documented that the resident refused all pain medications offered. She wrote the resident asked again for the Percocet at 1:00 AM and at this time it was signed off, and she was able…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to implement an effective infection control policy and procedures. This was evident during 1 of 1 random observation during the complaint survey. The findings include: A treatment cart is a cart that has supplies to provide treatments for resident and will have resident specific medicated treatments. The standard of nursing practice is to use this cart in the hallway to assemble treatment supplies for a resident, but does not go into the resident rooms for infection control purposes, just as medication carts and linen carts. On 5/19/26 at 9:59 AM a resident fell in their room on the second-floor nursing unit. In response Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #14 took the treatment cart with supplies laying on the top, into the resident's room between the bed and the wall and shut the door. When the nurse returned to the nurses' station on 5/19/26 at 10:07 AM, with the treatment cart she was interviewed. She reported that they do not normally take a treatment cart into the resident's rooms for infection control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and homelike environment. This was found to be evident on two out of two nursing units in the facility.The findings include: 1) On 10/1/25 at 12:58 PM surveyor observed the sink in the bathroom shared between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. Multiple cracks were observed around the drain and in the basin of the sink. On 10/09/25 at 10:53 AM surveyor and the Director of Nursing observed the cracks in the bathroom sink located between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. On 10/09/25 at 12:33 PM during an interview, the Maintenance Supervisor (Staff #14) reported that he was aware that some of the sinks were in rough shape and that they had replaced some of them. He also reported that he has submitted reports to Quality Assurance for rooms that need updating. On 10/9/25 at 12:45 PM surveyor and the Maintenance Supervisor observed sinks in two randomly selected rooms on the 200 unit, with concerns identified in one out of these two rooms. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and pertinent document review it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that residents received the items listed on the meal ticket or specific items that were requested by the residents. This was found to be evident for 2 residents (Resident #70 and #15) during random dining observations and one (Resident #2) during an interview with the resident council.The findings include:1.On 10/02/2025 at 1:09 PM Resident # 70, a long-term resident of the facility and without cognitive decline was interviewed. Resident #70 reported that a week before s/he was not served a BBQ sandwich that was on the facility menu and her/his meal ticket. Resident #70 reported that s/he was looking forward to the BBQ sandwich all day. S/he reported that the facility staff told her/him that they ran out of the BBQ sandwiches. On 10/6/2025 at 3:15 PM the facility Certified Dietary Manager (Staff #23) provided the meal ticket for the resident's dinner for 9/25/25. Review of the meal ticket for Resident # 70 revealed that a BBQ sandwich was listed as the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene; and maintain a sanitary environment in a manner that minimizes the potential development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was found to be evident for three (Resident # 2, #17 and #115) out of 53 residents reviewed; and two of three medication storage rooms observed during the survey. The findings include: 1.On 9/30/25 at 10:44 AM, Resident #115, admitted to the facility for rehabilitation, reported poor hygiene practices by staff. The resident stated that staff emptied a urine bottle in the bathroom but did not rinse or wipe it before placing it back on the bedside table. On 10/2/25 at 1:12 PM, an observation was made in Resident #17's room. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation and antibiotic therapy due to an infection. On 10/2/25 at 1:16 PM, continued observation revealed a plastic urinal on the resident's bedside table. The urinal fell off the table onto the floor. The Human Resource Director (Staff #24), retrieved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident had the right to a dignified existence and communication. This was found to be evident during one (Resident #7) out of two investigations regarding resident dignity conducted during the survey.The findings include: On 9/30/2025 at 9:40 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident #75 shared with the surveyor concerns about interactions with a GNA on the first floor who works on the unit during the day. On 10/01/2025 at 10:35 AM, during an interview with Resident #7, the surveyor asked whether there were concerns regarding dignity, respect, staff rapport, etc. Resident #7 and their family member, who was present during the interview, referred to a GNA during the surveyor's interview. Concerns raised by both Resident #7 and #75 pertained to the GNA's approach, tone, and demeanor toward the residents. Resident #7 stated, She is rude with residents and appears aggravated with the job. Resident #75 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents' personal possessions were treated with respect and safeguarded from interference by other residents. This was evident for one (Resident #37) of two residents reviewed for wandering behavior during the annual recertification survey.The findings include: On 9/30/2025 at 11:22 AM, during the initial facility tour and interview with Residents #62 and #72 on the first floor, they voiced concerns over Resident #37 coming in/out of rooms and taking personal belongings. Residents #62 and #72 stated that Resident #37 has entered their rooms at different times, most often overnight, and has taken items. On 10/1/2025 at 10:10 AM, during observation of the resident on the unit, it was observed that Resident #37 was wandering in the doorway of other resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) and was redirected by irritated residents twice within ten minutes. Three other staff were present during the surveyor's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, observation and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to make grievance information and the process of how to file a grievance readily available to staff and residents. This was evident for 1 (Resident #77) out of 1 resident reviewed for personal property during the survey. The findings include: On 10/2/25 at 1:49 PM Resident #77 reported to surveyor that 6 underpants were missing and stated, I've told everyone who comes in here. On 10/2/25 at 1:57 PM Social Service Assistant (Staff #10) provided the requested Grievance Policy. It stated the Grievance Official defaults to the Director of Social Services. And, in part, the facility will prominently post and make information available to all residents and others involved in resident care. And, in part, the location of grievance forms.will be posted near or on the grievance box. On 10/2/25 at 2:00 PM a record review of the 2025 Grievance Log lacked documentation that a grievance was filed on behalf of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 46 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to code the resident's status accurately on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This was evident for one (Resident #22) of two residents reviewed for positioning and mobility during the survey.The findings include: On 10/2/25 at 10:28 AM, Resident #22, a long-term resident of the facility, was observed lying in bed and reported doing well. On 10/2/25 at 1:53 PM, a review of occupational therapy notes provided by the Director of Therapy (Staff #19), for the certification period 7/9/24–8/7/24, did not indicate that Resident #22 had an upper extremity contracture. On 10/2/25 at 1:54 PM, a brief interview with the Director of Therapy (Staff #19), confirmed that Resident #22 did not have an upper extremity contracture. On 10/2/25 at 2:10 PM, a review of the annual MDS Section GG assessment, with a reference date of 8/15/25, revealed that the resident was coded as having a functional limitation in one upper extremity.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide quality of care for their residents. This was evident for one (Resident #125) of three residents reviewed for nutrition and one (Resident #3) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication.The findings include: 1.A complaint was received by the State Agency (SA) on 8/25/25, alleging the facility was not allowing Resident #125 to have water by mouth. The complainant explained that due to the extensive facial surgery (due to a diagnosis of buccal cavity (mouth) cancer) the resident had, s/he often experienced dry mouth and had been drinking water in the hospital. The complainant reported that the facility was giving the resident 1 can (237 milliliters mL) of Glucerna when s/he had been getting 2 cans (480 mL) in the hospital. The complainant reported this was due to the extra calories and protein needed to allow the resident to heal. Furthermore, the complainant reported that family had attempted to explain this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that prior to installation of bed rails appropriate alternatives were attempted, that residents were assessed for the risk of entrapment, and that informed consent was obtained, and failed to ensure re-evaluation for the continued use of the bed rails. This was found to be evident for two (Resident #41 and #88) out of two residents reviewed for bed rail usage. The findings include:1) Resident #41 has resided at the facility for more than a year and has a diagnosis of dementia. On 10/01/25 at 12:46 PM resident was observed in bed asleep with quarter bed rails in the up position.On 10/07/25 at approximately 11:00 AM resident was observed in bed asleep with quarter bed rails in the up position.On 10/7/25 at approximately 12 noon review of the medical record revealed the resident was dependent on staff for bed mobility. Review of the current care plan addressing activities of daily living, revealed an intervention of Bilateral bedrails to promote independence and assist with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined that the physician failed to review the hospital records for a resident who was newly admitted to the facility to ensure continuity of care. This was evident for 1 (Resident #125) of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. The findings include:On 10/8/25 at 1:33 PM a medical record for Resident #125 revealed a History and Physical dated 8/3/25 from the acute care hospital that was uploaded in the miscellaneous section of the electronic medical record. A review of the History and Physical (H&P) revealed in the Assessment/Plan section under the treatment for buccal cavity (mouth) cancer it was documented the resident had surgical intervention, the resident tolerated oral fluids but had aspiration precautions. Furthermore, it read to continue the tube feedings and medications via a gastric tube (g-tube is a tube that is directly inserted into the stomach). The resident was ordered 480 milliliters (mL) of Glucerna 1.5 at 9 am, 2 pm, and 7 pm. A review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure regularly scheduled medication was re-ordered and delivered in a timely manner; and failed to ensure staff accessed interim supply of medication when needed. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #3) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The findings include: On 10/6/25 review of Resident #3's medical record revealed the resident had an order for Atorvastatin 20 mg at bedtime for hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). This order had been in place since 8/12/25. Review of a pharmacy delivery manifest, signed by nurse #16, revealed 30 tablets of Atorvastatin 20 mg were delivered to the facility for Resident #3 on 8/12/25. On 10/6/25 review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed documentation that the resident received the Atorvastatin when due 8/12 through 9/15/25. This is 35 dosses that were documented by staff.On 10/6/25 review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and the progress notes revealed the Atorvastatin was not administered on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident treatment carts were locked when unattended; ensure insulin pens were dated upon opening and discarded according to manufacturer guidelines; and ensure that insulin pens were stored in a manner that prevented potential cross-contamination. This was evident during two random observation of treatment carts; 1 of 3 medication carts and 2 out of 3 medication storage rooms observed during the annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1.On [DATE] at 6:20 AM, an observation was made on the first floor. A treatment cart was noted near the nursing station but not within direct view of staff. The cart was unlocked, and the surveyor was able to open one drawer without staff noticing. The surveyor alerted Nurse (Staff #20) to the unlocked cart. Nurse (Staff #20) stated the cart should have been locked. On [DATE] at 6:21 AM, a review of the cart contents with Nurse (Staff #20) revealed, but was not limited to, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure only one active version of a resident's orders for life-sustaining treatment was located in the medical record. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #3) out of four residents reviewed for advance directives.The findings include: Review of Resident #3's electronic medical record revealed, in the miscellaneous section, an upload of a current Maryland Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form that included orders to Attempt CPR. This order, also known as a full code, means if cardiac and/or pulmonary arrest occurs, attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); this includes any and all medical efforts that are indicated during arrest, including artificial ventilation and efforts to restore and/or stabilize cardiopulmonary function. This MOLST was dated [DATE].MOLST forms include orders for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and other medical personnel regarding CPR. It…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to document that the resident either received the pneumococcal and influenza vaccine(s) or did not receive the vaccine(s) due to medical contraindications, previous vaccination, or refusal. This was evident for 1 (Resident #117) out 5 residents reviewed for immunizations during the survey.The findings include: On 10/6/25 at 12:20 PM a record review in the electronic health record (EHR) regarding Resident #117 vaccination records revealed that the resident was admitted on [DATE]. It lacked documentation of immunization of whether the resident did or did not receive the vaccines, contraindications, vaccine history or refusal. On 10/6/25 at 12:45 PM in an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Infection Preventionist (Nurse #15), indicated that the process for immunizing or verifying a new resident's vaccine status was usually done in 5 days. They were unable to produce documentation that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to document that the resident either received the Covid vaccine or did not receive the vaccine due to medical contraindications, previous vaccination, or refusal. This was evident for 1 (Resident #117) out 5 residents reviewed for immunizations during the recertification survey.The findings include:On 10/6/25 at 12:20 PM a record review in the electronic health record (EHR) regarding Resident #117 vaccination records revealed that the resident was admitted on [DATE]. It lacked documentation of Covid immunization, of whether the resident did or did not receive the vaccine, contraindications, vaccine history or refusal. On 10/6/25 at 12:45 PM in an interview, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Infection Preventionist (Nurse #15), indicated that the process for immunizing or verifying a new resident's vaccine status was usually done in 5 days. They were unable to produce documentation that Resident #117's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-25 · tag F0624 — patternPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to document what preparation and orientation was given to residents to ensure an orderly transfer to an acute care facility. This was evident for 4 (#87, #76, #73, and #80) ) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure that each resident receives the care they need. 1a) On 9/13/23 at 10:45 AM, a review of Resident #87's medical record was conducted and revealed that Resident #87 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 following an acute hospitalization. On 7/30/23 at 4:00 AM, in an SBAR summary, the nurse documented that Resident #87 was noted to be breathing harder and faster, heart rate kept jumping and the resident's Oxygen saturation was low. The nurse indicated the primary care provider was made aware and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-25 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 5 (Resident #45, #74, #80, #52, and #56) of 45 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure that each resident receives the care they need. Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing facilities for long-term care. The PASRR process requires all applicants to Medicaid-certified nursing facilities (NFs) to be given a preliminary assessment to determine whether they might have serious mental illness or intellectual disability. This is called a Level…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a person-centered care plan. This was evident of 3 (Resident #41, #74, and #58) of 45 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1) Resident #41 has been residing in the facility since 2017. The medical records stated that Resident #41 had No speech and was rarely/never understood for making him/herself understood or ability to understand others. On 9/8/23 at 1:01PM, Resident #41's care plan that was completed on 8/9/23 was reviewed and revealed that s/he was dependent on staff for activities, cognitive stimulation, and social interaction. One of the interventions included in this care plan included: Prefers activities which do not involve overly demanding cognitive tasks. Engage in simple, structured activities such as (Specify). The end of this intervention was left blank, and no evidence was found in the resident's medical record specifying which structured activity the facility planned to provide for the resident. On 9/12/23 at 10:07AM, the activities director (staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure that interdisciplinary team care plan meetings were scheduled to review and revise care plans after each Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This was evident for 3 (Resident #52, #56, and #70) out of 3 residents reviewed for care plan timing and revision. The findings include: Minimum Data Set (MDS)- The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. 1) Resident #52 has been residing in the facility since 2019. During the initial pool process, the resident was asked if the facility conducted meetings that included him/her in the development of their care plan. On 9/07/23 at 9:15AM, the resident answered, I don't think so. On 9/11/23 at 9:52AM, a review of the resident's electronic medical records (EMR) revealed the last care plan meeting held for Resident #52 was 6/14/23 while the last MDS assessment had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of pertinent documents and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to document a grievance and investigate the loss of a hearing aid as reported by a resident's family. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 247) out of 8 Residents reviewed for abuse during a survey. The findings include: On 9/19/23 at 8:12 AM, review of # MD00165791 revealed an allegation that the facility failed to replace a resident's lost hearing aid. On 9/19/23 at 9:01 AM, the Social Service Director provided a facility policy titled, Policies and Standard Procedures; subject: Resident Loss or Damaged Hearing Aid/ Dentures. Review of the policy revealed that a grievance form would be filled out for all missing or broken hearing aids. Further review revealed that the facility would replace lost hearing aids if the investigation revealed the facility was negligent. On 9/19/23 at 11:34 AM, during an Interview with the Social Services Director, she reported that their procedure was to complete a grievance form when an item was reported missing. The investigation of the missing item and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on pertinent document review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a policy regarding the consent for sexual activity in residents with impaired cognition. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 16) out of 16 residents reviewed for abuse during a survey. The findings include: Capacity for consent to sexual activity is the ability to understand and process the information necessary to make an informed decision to participate in sexual activity. Determining capacity to consent is an important step in investigating an allegation of sexual abuse towards a resident with impaired cognition. Review of Resident #16's records revealed that the resident was a long-term resident at the facility. Review of Physician Certification Related to Medical Condition, decision making and treatment limitations, dated 12/24/18, revealed that Resident #16 was assessed by a physician to lack adequate decision-making capacity (including decisions about life-sustaining treatments). Resident #16' s family member was appointed as the power of attorney (POA) to assist the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within the mandated time frame. This was evident for 2 (Resident #251, #248) out of 16 residents investigated for abuse. The findings include: 1) On 9/22/23 at 10:45 AM, a review of the facility reported incident MD00173990 revealed that an allegation of abuse was made by Resident #248 to the day shift nurse at 8:00 AM on 11/5/21. A review of the timeline included in the investigation documentation revealed this information was then conveyed to the then acting Director of Nursing (DON Staff #26). Further review of the timeline revealed that the initial report was sent to the state agency by the acting DON (staff #26) on 11/5/21 at 12 PM. This information was verified by the time stamped email sent by Staff #26 to the state agency. On 9/25/23 at 12:30 PM, surveyor discussed the concern with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and she confirmed in this interview that for Resident #248, the facility failed to report the allegation of abuse within the mandated time frame.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility reported incident (FRI) investigation documentation, it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse. This was evident for 1 (MD00189938) of 4 facility reported incidents reviewed for resident-to-resident altercations. The findings include: On 9/11/23 at 11:47 AM, a review was conducted of the facility's investigation of the facility reported incident MD00189938 related to an altercation between Resident #45 and Resident #55. A facility self-report, dated 3/9/23 at 6:25 PM, revealed documentation that while Resident #45 was in his/her own room, Staff #36, Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) witnessed Resident #45 go over to the bedside of Resident #55, his/her roommate at which time Resident #55 reached up and slapped Resident #45 hand. The facility's self-report documented that the altercation between Resident #45 and Resident #55 was witnessed by Staff #36, GNA, who then reported the incident to Staff #9, LPN. Review of the facility's investigative documents failed to reveal evidence that staff or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to document the information that was provided to the acute care facility to ensure a safe and effective transition of care when a resident was transferred there emergently. This was evident for 1 (#76) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: On 9/14/23 at 8:55 AM, a review of Resident #76's medical record was conducted. The medical record documented Resident #76 was admitted to the facility in mid July 2023. On 8/6/23 at 8:50 PM, in a nurse's note, the nurse documented that Resident #76 was found to be very lethargic, weak, elevated temperature, diaphoretic (sweating heavily), with an altered mental status. The resident was able to open eyes, respond to verbal stimuli and was not oriented and Resident #76's significant other wanted the resident sent to the hospital, 911 was called, and Resident #76 was transferred to the hospital. The nurse wrote that telehealth was notified, all documentation was sent to the hospital with 911 and report was called to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and medical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify resident/resident representative in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 1 (#73) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the annual survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure that each resident receives the care they need. On 9/07/23 at 10:51 AM, during an interview with Resident #73's Representative, she stated that Resident # 73 was hospitalized in April 2023. On 9/18/23 at 10:05 AM, a medical record review revealed that Resident #73 had severe cognitive impairment per a Minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/22/23. A continued record review showed a nurse's note, dated 4/27/23, which indicated that Resident # 73 continued to have hip pain after a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and medical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of the bed hold policy upon transfer to an acute care facility. This was evident for 1 (#73) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the annual survey. The findings include: On 9/07/23 at 10:51 AM, an interview with Resident # 73's Representative revealed that Resident # 73 was hospitalized in April 2023. On 9/18/23 at 10:05 AM, a medical record review for Resident #73 was conducted. The review revealed a nurse's note, dated 4/27/23 that indicated that Resident # 73 continued to have hip pain after a fall. An X-ray confirmed a possible fracture, and the attending physician gave an order for Resident # 73 to be transferred to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment. A continued medical record review for Resident #73 showed a nurse's note, dated 4/27/23, that stated, County Medical Ambulance Transport on site @ 2145 hours, resident transferred to ambulance stretcher with some c/o pain and secured for safe transport. Face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide a resident and/or a resident's representative with a summary of the baseline care plan that included a summary of the resident's medications. This was evident for 2 (#87, #76) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: A baseline care plan must be completed within 48 hours of a resident's admission to the facility and must include the initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, and social services. A summary of the baseline care plan as well as a list of the resident's current medications must be given to each resident. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) On 9/12/23 at 12:01 PM, when asked who was responsible reviewing the baseline care plan and providing the resident and/or the resident's representative a copy of the care plan, along with a summary of the resident's medications,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support the resident in their choice of activities. This was evident in 3 (Resident #45, #87, and #70) out of 4 residents reviewed for activities. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Minimum Data Set- The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. 1) On 9/6/23 at approximately 2:00 PM, Resident #45 was observed in his/her room, lying on the bed. At that time, no television or radio was noted to be on. On 9/7/23 at 12:27 PM, Resident #45 was observed wandering in his/her room. At that time, no television or radio was noted to be on. In addition, on 9/6/23, 9/7/23, 9/8/23 and 9/11/23, random observations of Resident #45 failed to reveal evidence that the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report a resident's vital signs that were not within normal limits (WNL) to the resident's physician. This was evident for 1 (Resident #255) out of 5 residents reviewed for neglect during a survey. The findings include: Review of medical records on 9/15/23 at 11:15 AM, revealed that Resident #255 was admitted to the facility following a hospital stay. His/her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, orthostatic hypotension, chronic kidney disease and a cerebral vascular incident (Stoke). Orthostatic hypotension is a condition in which your blood pressure suddenly drops when you stand from a seated or lying position. Hypotension means low blood pressure. Per CDC a normal blood pressure is generally accepted to be 120/80 mm/Hg. Review of records for Resident # 255 on 9/15/23, revealed a nursing progress note, dated 7/12/23 at 5:30 AM, that Resident had a fall. Further review revealed that, immediately following the fall, the resident had a low blood pressure reading of 88/69 mm/Hg. Continued…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to manage a resident's pain effectively. This was evident for 1 (#249) of 5 residents reviewed for neglect. The findings include: A pain scale is from 0-10; 0 means no pain, and 10 means the worst pain. It is used to assess the level of pain a patient is experiencing for better treatment. Non-pharmacological pain management is an intervention without the use of medications On 9/14/23 at 9:13 AM, a review of complaint # MD 00178633 for Resident # 249 revealed that Resident had back pain, which was ineffectively managed by the facility staff. On 9/21/23 at 10:41 AM, during a medical record review, it was revealed that a care plan for pain was initiated on 7/23/21 for Resident # 249. The interventions on the care plan included but were not limited to administer non-pharmacological interventions (repositioning, diversion activities, snacks, fluids, ice/heat, muscle therapy relaxation techniques, imagery). A medical record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff Interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician reviewed the resident's total program of care at each visit. This was evident for 1 (#87) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according to their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II (superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III (full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone, or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and / or eschar in the wound bed). A deep tissue injury (DTI) is a unique form of pressure ulcer. The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel defines a deep tissue injury as A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a registered nurse (RN) was providing services for at least 8 consecutive hours a day during a 24 hour period. This was evident for 1 out of the 14 days reviewed for RN scheduling. The findings include: On 9/15/23, review of the assignment sheets from August 24th to September 6th, failed to reveal documentation to indicate that a registered nurse was working in the facility starting on the night shift of 9/1/23 till the night shift of 9/2/23. On 9/15/23 at 2:20 PM, the workforce manager (staff #29) was interviewed about her process in scheduling of staff in the facility. Staff #29 reported that the facility currently had openings for 2 night shift nurses. The surveyor discussed the concern with Staff #29 that the review of the assignment sheets revealed that on 9/1/23, no RN was on duty for the night shift, and no RN was on duty for all shifts on 9/2/23. This review revealed a total of 32 consecutive hours of not having an RN on duty in the facility. Staff #29 acknowledged that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2) On 9/08/23 at 12:10 PM, a medical record review for Resident #74 revealed an attending physician's order written on 5/7/23 for antihypertensive medication at bedtime for high blood pressure. The physician's order stated to check blood pressure and hold the medication for systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than or equal to 110 mmHg (millimeters of mercury). Systolic blood pressure is the top blood pressure and refers to the amount of pressure in the arteries during the heart muscle contraction. A review of Resident #74's medication administration records from 5/7/23 to 9/5/23 showed that Resident #74's SBP were not monitored daily. A review of the vital signs section of the facility's medical record documented blood pressure for Resident # 74; however, the blood pressure was not taken every day, and there was no correlation between when the blood pressure was taken and when the medication was administered. On 9/12/23 at 10:13 AM, an interview was conducted with staff # 32, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). During the interview, staff # 32 checked Resident #32's Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were kept in locked compartments. This was found to be evident on 1 (2nd floor unit) of 2 nursing units. The findings include: 1) On 9/15/23 at 2:44 PM surveyor observed on the desk level of the 2nd floor nursing station a plastic bag marked REFRIGERATE which contained Latanoprost opth. Solution (eye drops) for Resident #16. No staff were observed at the station at the time of the observation. A nurse was in the hall at a medication cart, but was not behind the desk. The Director of Nursing (DON) arrived at the nursing unit at approximately the same time as the observation, when surveyor pointed out the medication on the counter, the DON stated: What is this? The DON then indicated she would throw out the medication. On 9/20/23 at 3:15 PM, surveyor informed the DON of the medication storage concern related to the observation on Friday 9/15/23. DON acknowledged the concern. 2) On 9/13/23 at 7:54 AM, the surveyor observed that the treatment cart, labeled 2B, was unlocked. All doors of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and pertinent document review, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store food to prevent foodborne illness. This was evident in 1 Kitchen refrigerator out of 2, and 1 resident refreshment refrigerator out of 2, reviewed during a survey. The findings include: 0n 9/6/23 at 10:31 AM, an observation was made of refrigerator A in the facility kitchen. The surveyor was accompanied by the culinary supervisor (staff #21). The observation revealed 1 open container of mandarin oranges, 1 open container of chicken salad and 1 open container of egg salad. All items were without cover or date and time label. Staff # 21 was unable to state when the chicken salad or egg salad were made. Observation of the second-floor refreshment refrigerator on 09/13/23 at 07:00 AM, with nurse (staff # 3) revealed a refrigerator temperature log hanging on the wall behind the door. A closer observation of the temperature log revealed that the log was dated September 2023. It contained spaces for a daily AM temperature and PM temperature recordings, initials, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records. This was evident for 1 (resident #16) out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during a survey. The findings include: On 9/12/23, review of medical records for Resident #16 revealed that the resident received Psychogeriatric services from Nurse Practitioner (Staff #20), on 8/30/23. On 9/20/23 at 10:18 AM, the Nurse Practitioner (Staff #20) was interviewed regarding the care provided to resident #16 on 8/30/23. During the interview Staff #2O reported that she had not provided care to Resident #16 on 8/30/23. The Nurse practitioner reported that the document in Resident #16's medical record, on 8/30/23 was written by her, but it was for another resident's medical record, with a similar name. The document in Residents #16's medical record was a medical documentation for another resident that she had provided care to. On 9/21/23 at 9:15 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed, and the above concern was reviewed. The DON reported that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — isolatedHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to hire a qualified employee to provide social services for their residents. This was evident for 1 (Staff #7) of 1 staff reviewed in the Social Services Department. The findings include: During an interview with the Social Services Director Staff #7 on 9/20/23 at 8:03 AM, she reported that she had been hired in 2014 and she had been grandfathered in to provide social services to the residents. In addition, she stated she had a degree in human services. A review of Staff #7's employee file on 9/20/23, revealed she was hired as the Social Services Director in 2019 and per her application, she held an Associate Degree in human services. The regulation requires that the person hired to provide social services to residents should have a Bachelor's degree or higher. On 9/20/23 at approximately 2:30 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was asked to review the employee file and confirm whether or not Staff #7 had a Bachelor's degree in human services. An interview with the NHA on 9/21/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were offered the pneumococcal vaccine. This was evident in 1 (Resident #87) out of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations during the survey process. The findings include: Resident #87's medical record was reviewed on 9/15/23 at 11:01 AM and revealed the resident was admitted in July of 2023. Review of the resident's admission assessment revealed documentation that the resident had not received a pneumococcal vaccination. Further review of the record revealed no evidence of contraindication or that the vaccine was offered and that the resident had declined the vaccination. Contraindication is a medical term used for a specific situation or factor that makes a procedure or course of treatment inadvisable, because it may be harmful to a person. On 9/15/23 at 11:43 AM, the Infection preventionist nurse (IP/RN staff #14) was interviewed about her process when the facility admits a new resident. When the IP nurse (staff #14) was asked specifically about immunizations, she stated, When…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-02-08 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident, along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 6 (#95, 49, #46, #91, #20, #74) of 8 residents reviewed that were transferred to an acute care facility. The findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #95 on 2/5/19 revealed documentation that the resident was sent to an acute care facility on 10/12/18 for lethargy, and on 11/5/18 for abnormal laboratory results. There was no written documentation found in the medical record that the resident and/or resident representative was notified of the transfer in writing. 2) Review of the medical record for Resident #49 on 2/6/19 revealed documentation that the resident was sent to an acute care facility on 8/3/18 for chest pain, on 11/22/18 for a leg fracture, and on 12/27/18 for chest pain. There was no written documentation found in the medical record that the resident and/or resident representative was notified of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-02-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — widespreadDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and review of medical records, it was determined that the facility failed to evaluate, and revise care plans as resident care needs became apparent or changed over time. This was evident for 10 (#46, #49, #91, #8, #53, #74, #3, #96, #59, #84) of 23 residents in the final sample. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) On [DATE] at 7:23 PM, Resident #46 stated, I have a problem with my nerves. It was difficult to interview the resident and the resident sat in the hallway in a wheelchair and yelled constantly for the nurse. Review of Resident #46's medical record on [DATE] revealed a care plan, has a behavior problem r/t yelling out. Resident indicates he/she feels down and depressed and feels tired. Resident at times has trouble concentrating on things and has trouble falling asleep. He/She has a diagnosis of depression, anxiety and schizoaffective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-02-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and interviews with the facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that effective quality assessment and assurance performance improvement interventions were implemented to address deficiencies from a previous survey. This was evident during review of the Quality Assurance program. The findings include: Review of the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Program with Staff #7 on 2/1/19 at 5:45 PM, revealed that effective processes were not put in place regarding repeat deficiencies. The facility's action plans did not resolve quality deficiencies identified during the last recertification survey which concluded on 9/28/17 with a plan of correction compliance date of 11/12/17. The repeat deficiencies reviewed with staff #7 included areas of 1) Safe, clean, homelike environment, 2) accurate assessments, 3) care plan timing and revision, 4) quality of care, 5) posting of staffing, 6) free from unnecessary medications and 7) resident records.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and staff interview during facility environmental observations, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior, this was observed on both levels of the facility. The findings include: The following observations were made by multiple surveyors during initial observations of residents and the environment on 2/4/19 and 2/5/19. On 2/8/19 at 4:30 PM, an environmental tour was conducted with the nursing home administrator (NHA) and the director of nursing (DON) to review environmental concerns. Areas of concern included: room [ROOM NUMBER] - The laminate on the edge of the top of the dresser was missing and the particle board was exposed. The laminate on the over the bed tray table was missing from the top edge and around the corner of the table. The right side of the wheelchair was missing the vinyl edge mid-section. The paint on the ceiling in the shared bathroom was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-08 · tag F0624 — patternPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to document what preparation and orientation was given to residents to ensure an orderly transfer to an acute care facility. This was evident for 5 (#95, #49, #46, #91, #20) of 8 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #95 on 2/5/19 revealed documentation that the resident was sent to an acute care facility on 10/12/18 for lethargy, and on 11/5/18 for abnormal laboratory results. 2) Review of the medical record for Resident #49 on 2/6/19 revealed documentation that the resident was sent to an acute care facility on 8/3/18 for chest pain, on 11/22/18 for a leg fracture, and on 12/27/18 for chest pain. 3) Review of the medical record for Resident #46 on 2/7/19 revealed documentation that Resident #46 was sent to an acute care facility on 1/27/19. 4) Review of the medical record for Resident #91 on 2/8/19 revealed documentation that the resident was sent to an acute care facility on 5/28/18 due to a fall. 5) Review of the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interview, observation and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans with measurable goals. This was evident for 8 (#91, #95, #46, #74, #3, #53, #56, #6 ) of 23 residents in the final sample. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) An interview was conducted with Resident #91, on 2/5/19 at 9:48 AM. Resident #91 stated, after I fell I lost my hearing. I would like to see an audiologist. A review of the medical record on 2/6/19 revealed an activities progress note, dated 10/20/18, which stated, resident's care plan meeting was held on 10/17/18 with resident present, resident spoke with social services concerning issues with new glasses and requesting an eye doctor appointment, as well as seeing ENT doctor for hearing loss in left ear. A plan of care note, dated 10/26/2018 at 12:39, documented, Resident indicated that she needed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-02-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, It was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regimen was free from an unnecessary psychotropic medication by 1) failing to adequately monitor a resident for behavior, side effects or adverse consequences related to psychotropic medication use and 2) failing to ensure that a psychotropic medication prescribed as needed was limited to 14 days. This was evident for 3 (#59, #56, #84) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1) Resident #59's January 2019 and February 2019 MAR (medication administration record) was reviewed on 2/6/19. The MAR documented that Resident #59 received the psychotropic medications, Trazodone (antidepressant) by mouth every day for depression, Paroxetine (Paxil) (antidepressant) by mouth every day for depression, Klonopin (anxiolytic) by mouth twice a day for anxiety, and Seroquel (Quetiapine) (antipsychotic) by mouth every day for psychotic disorder. Review of Resident #59's January 2019 and February 2019 TAR (treatment administration record)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to keep updated and accurate medical records. This was evident for 7 (#6, #51, #49, #91, #53, #13, #59) of 23 residents in the final sample. The findings include: 1) The facility failed to accurately document oxygen uses for resident #49. Observation was made on 2/5/19 at 10:17 AM of Resident #49 receiving oxygen (O2) at 3L/min. A second observation was made, on 2/6/19 at 4:02 PM, of Resident #49 sitting in a wheelchair with a portable oxygen tank sitting on the back of the wheelchair. The resident was receiving oxygen and the flow rate was set at 3L/min. Subsequent observations were made on 2/7/19 at 9:45 AM and 2:15 PM on 3L/min. Review of the February 2019 physician's orders documented that oxygen was ordered at 4L/min. The order was initially written on 8/9/18. Review of the February 2019 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed that the nursing staff was signing off that 4L/min oxygen was being administered when the resident was observed to be receiving 3L/min on 3 days. In addition,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 2 (#17, #69) of 2 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment, 1 (#91) of 2 residents reviewed for communication/sensory, and for 1 (#59) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include. The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #17 on 2/5/19 revealed a psychiatry note, dated 11/1/18, which documented the diagnosis psychosis. Review of the MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/3/18 failed to capture the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-08 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interview and medical record review, it was determined the facility failed to follow up with the resident to ensure that the resident received the services necessary to maintain adequate hearing. This was evident for 1 (#91) of 2 residents reviewed for communication/sensory. The findings include: On 2/5/19 at 9:48 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #91. Resident #91 stated, I fell and after the fall my hearing has not been right since. The resident continued, I would like to see an audiologist. I asked them, but they just passed it on. A review of Resident #91's medical record on 2/6/19 revealed an activity's progress note, dated 10/20/18, which stated, Resident's care plan meeting was held on 10/17/18 with resident present, resident spoke with social services concerning issues with new glasses and requesting an eye doctor appointment as well as seeing ENT doctor of hearing loss in left ear. A second note, dated 10/26/18 at 12:39 PM, stated, Care plan meeting held on 10/17/2018. The note continued, Resident indicated she needed an appointment to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide services or treatment to increase or prevent further decrease in Range of Motion (ROM). This was evident for 1 (#74) of 2 residents reviewed for Position, Mobility. The findings include: Resident #74 was observed on 2/5/19 at 11:24 AM. The resident's left hand appeared to have a contracture (condition of fixed high resistance to passive stretch of a muscle). Staff #6 was interviewed at that time and confirmed that Resident #74 had contractures of his/her left hand and both legs. He/She also indicated that the resident had braces, but they were discontinued due to the resident's refusal and indicated that the resident received functional maintenance ROM exercises during care. Review of Resident #74's medical record revealed a current physician's order, written 1/16/19, for bilateral (left and right) palm protectors to be donned to Resident #74's upper extremities (hands) as patient is able to tolerate, as contracture management, every shift. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) ensure that oxygen was administered at the rate ordered by the physician, 2) failed to accurately document the resident's oxygen rate in the treatment record, 3) failed to assess a resident's breath sounds before and after a breathing treatment and failed to develop a resident centered care plan for a resident with a diagnosis of Asthma and receiving oxygen. This was evident for 1 (#59) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, and for 1 (#49) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The findings include: 1) Resident #59 was observed utilizing oxygen via nasal cannula (n/c) tubing connected to an oxygen concentrator on 2/5/19 at 11:00 AM, on 2/6/19 at 4:18 PM, and 2/7/19 at 9:45 AM. On each of these observations the oxygen concentrator was set at 3.5 l/m (liters/minute). On 2/7/19, a review of Resident #59's TAR (treatment administration record) revealed an order for 02 (oxygen) at 2 L via n/c to maintain 02 saturation above 90% every shift that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-08 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that a physician failed to fully evaluate a resident as related to facility acquired pressure ulcers. This is evident for 1 (#75) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: Review of Resident #75's medical record on 2/7/19 revealed this resident had acquired pressure ulcers while in the facility. On 11/3/18, a progress note was written related to the discovery of a stage II pressure ulcer to the resident's left buttock. The note indicated that the resident's attending physician was notified. The resident's attending physician had visited the resident on 11/14/18, 12/10/18, and 1/18/19. Review of the 3 handwritten physician notes did not reveal any documentation related to resident #73's facility acquired pressure ulcer. Review of the physician progress notes with the charge nurse (staff #14) on 2/7/19 at 2:30 PM, acknowledged that the 3 monthly physician notes do not assess or evaluate medical issues related to the resident's skin condition. Per nursing documentation in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-08 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3) A review of the medical record for Resident #13 on 2/6/19 noted the last physician's visit in the paper medical record was dated for 3/5/18. The last physician's visit in the electronic medical record was dated 9/11/18, with a documented average of 1 month between physician visit and upload to electronic medical record. There were no other physician's progress notes found in either the paper or electronic medical record. Upon request monthly physician visits notes going back to 4/8/2018 was received on 2/7/19 for review. Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the physician failed to write, sign and date medical visit progress notes in resident medical records on the day the resident was seen. This was evident for 1 (#49) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care, 1 (#91) of 2 residents reviewed for communication/sensory, 1 (#13) of 2 residents reviewed for mood/behavior and 1 (#53) of 3 residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcer/Injury. The findings include: 1) A review of the medical record for Resident #49 on 2/6/19 noted the last physician's visit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$97,777 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $97,777 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC MSTR LSCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/01/2017 |
| STOLTZ, CHARLES | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2017 |
| ROMEO, DOMINIC | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2023 |
| WILHEIM, RONALD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/01/2017 |
| WINIFRED MGT CO., LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/16/2025 |
| BLOWE, NOLA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2017 |
| GROVES, DONNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| MCELDOWNEY, THOMAS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2017 |
| ODENTHAL, RICHARD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $633K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215055. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.