Worthington Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 89.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and accident-free environment as possible. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident #46 to harm himself in the absence of 1:1 supervision. Resident identifier: #46. Facility census: 93. The state agency determined this failure placed Resident #46's 1:1 observation status in an immediate jeopardy situation due to the potential of serious injury and/or death because of recent documented suicidal ideations and recent suicide attempt. The state agency notified the Nursing Home Administrator of the immediate jeopardy at 3:52 PM on 04/03/24. The facility submitted a plan of correction (POC) at 5:41 PM. At 5:48 PM, the POC was accepted by the state agency. The state agency verified the POC was implemented by conducting staff interviews and the immediate jeopardy was abated at 12:05 PM on 04/08/24. Findings included: a) Resident #46 On 04/03/24 at 2:16 PM, an observation was made of Resident #46 alone lying in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · L2024-02-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to be administered in a manner which enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to enable each resident to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical mental and psycho social well being. The facility's administration failed to identify and substantiate physical abuse and involuntary seclusion and take appropriate actions to ensure the alleged perpetrators did not abuse residents in the future. Neither resident was able to verbalize how these actions made them feel therefore the reasonable person standard was applied. These actions placed these two (2) residents and the remaining 93 residents at risk for serious harm and/or death because both alleged perpetrators were still employed by the facility and actions were not taken to ensure they did not abuse other residents in the future. All 95 residents were in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation. The facility was first notified of the IJ at 6:15 PM, on 02/20/24. The state agency (SA) received the Plan of Correction (POC) at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-02-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse due to being physically restrained. Resident #43 was physically restrained by a nurse aide who held her head preventing movement when a nurse swabbed her nose to test for COVID. Resident #11 became agitated and a nurse took the resident to their room where they locked the resident's wheelchair and physically held the resident's wheelchair preventing the residnet from moving and leaving the room. Neither resident was able to verbalize how these actions made them feel therefore the reasonable person standard was applied. These actions placed these two (2) residents and the remaining 93 residents at risk for serious harm and/or death because both alleged perpetrators were still employed by the facility and actions were not taken to ensure they did not abuse other residents in the future. All 95 residents were in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation. The facility was first notified of the IJ at 6:15 PM, on 02/20/24. The state agency (SA) received the Plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-02-23 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse. Staff physically restrained two (2) residents. Resident #43 was and #11 were both physically restrained. A nurse aide (NA) nurse aide held her head preventing movement so the nurse could perform a swab of the nose to test Resident #43 for COVID. Resident #11 became agitated and a nurse took the resident to their room where they locked the resident's wheelchair and physically held the resident's wheelchair preventing them from moving and leaving their room. Neither resident was able to verbalize how these actions made them feel therefore the reasonable person standard was applied. Not only did these failures harm Resident #11 and Resident #43 but they also placed them and the remaining 93 residents at risk for serious harm and/or death. The alleged perpetrators were still employed by the facility and actions were not taken to ensure they did not abuse other residents in the future. This placed all 95 residents in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. The staff failed to use proper hand hygiene and don a hairnet while in the kitchen. Lastly, failed to maintain the equipment in safe operating condition. This practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 93. Findings included: a) On 04/02/2024 at 12:49 PM, during a visit to the kitchen the following was observed: -Corn flakes found stored without label opening and used by date -Breaded fish found in freezer left open to air. In an interview with The Food Service Supervisor, at 1:10 PM on 04/02/2024, she acknowledged the both the corn flakes were found stored without an opening and used by dated label, and the breaded fish was found left open to air in the freezer. On 04/02/25 at 11:50 PM During lunch dining observation it was observed that NA #79 wheeled a male resident into the dining room to a table and walked into the kitchen. Observing through the window on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain labs, as ordered by the physician, for Resident #41. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the survey process. Resident identifier: #41. Facility census: 93. Findings include: A) Resident #41 During a review of Resident 41's record on 04/01/25, it was noted the resident had the following order- CBC, BMP and HGBA1C in the morning every three (3) months starting on the 2nd for one (1) day. This order was entered into the system on 11/4/24. Review of the resident's lab results, and progress notes indicated no labs were drawn in the month of March 2025. According to the order, the labs should have been taken on 03/02/25. Documentation regarding the labs was requested from the facility at approximately 11:45 AM on 04/01/25. On 04/01/25 at approximately 1:44 PM, the facility provided documentation related to Resident #41's labs. The only documentation for lab draws, were from labs completed on 12/02/24. Upon further review of Resident #41's orders, it was noted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure a physician order for pain was correctly followed for Resident #4. This failed practice was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for pain. Resident identifier: #4. Facility census: 93. Findings included: a) Resident #4 A medical record review, completed on 05/09/23 at 11:27 AM, revealed the following physician order, dated 02/09/25, Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Tablet 7.5-325 MG. Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for moderate to severe pain (5-10) not to exceed 3gm Tylenol in 24hr. Review of the February and March 2025 Medication Administration Records (MARs) revealed the following dates and times the medication was not given in accordance with the physician's order: -On 02/13/25, the medication was given with a pain level of 4 -On 02/22/25, the medication was given with a pain level of 4 -On 02/22/25, the medication was given with a pain level of 4 -On 03/18/25, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to aid a resident and/or their legal representatives with advance care planning, including but not limited to completion of advanced directives per professional standards. This is true for one (1) of 27 reviewed for advanced directives. Resident identifier #75. Facility census: 93. Findings included: a) Resident #75 A medical record review for Resident #75 revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE]. An Encounter Summary provided to the surveyor from the transferring hospital found the capacity statements from 02/29/25. -- Demonstrates Capacity to make medical decisions was marked. Continued review found that physician determination of capacity was completed on 02/20/25. -- Demonstrates Capacity to make decisions was marked. Subsequent review found that the review of Resident 75's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with the ARD date of 02/26/25, finds the resident has a score of 03. A BIMS score of 3 indicates that the resident is severely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and/or implement the care plan for Resident #92, #84, #39 and #95, four (4) of four (4) residents reviewed. Resident identifiers: #92, #84, #39 and #95. Facility Census: 93. Findings included: a) Resident #92 On 04/03/24 at 9:00 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #92. The review found the care plan had not been developed to include all the interventions based on the physician's orders and the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated 03/01/24 through 03/31/24. The interventions that were not found were as follows: --Daily assessment of the unstageable (UN) wound on the right heel --Wound care as ordered On 04/03/24 at 10:00 AM, the Corporate Registered Nurse (RN) was notified and confirmed the interventions were not listed. b) Resident #84 On 04/03/24 at 9:15 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #84. The record review found the care plan had not been developed to include an Unstageable wound on the sacrum and the interventions found in the physician's orders and the TAR dated 03/01/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders four (4) of four (4) residents. Resident identifiers: #92, #84, #39 and #95. Facility Census: 93. Findings included: a) Resident #92 On 04/03/24 at 9:00 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #92. The review found the physician's orders on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for 03/01/24 through 03/31/24 were not followed. The following treatments and dates were left blank: --Daily wound treatment to the stage III to the sacrum --03/02/24 day shift --Daily wound assessment for the stage III to the sacrum --03/02/24 day shift --Preventative treatment to the coccyx and bilateral buttocks twice daily --03/25/24 night shift --Bilateral palm guards on hands may remove twice daily to clean and monitor skin --03/25/24 night shift --Float heels when in bed twice daily for preventative measures --03/25/24 night shift --Resident may use pillow cases between knees to prevent skin breakdown due to contractures twice daily --03/25/24 night shift --Ensure resident has been turned and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of legislative rule § 69-10-1 TITLE 69 Rule Department of Health and Human Resources, Series 10 [NAME] Virgnia Clearance for Access: Registry and Employment Screening and staff interview, the facility failed to implement the facility policies to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property ensure provisional employment screening. The facility also failed to ensure completion of background checks before allowing staff to work and have direct access to the residents. All residents had the potential to be affected. The facility failed to provisionally employ staff pending the [NAME] Virginia Cares fitness determination and the facility failed to require a fingerprint-based background check before hiring staff. The facility had identified and corrected this issue prior to the survey. Staff identifiers: #28, #44, #80, #109, #110, #119 and #127. Facility Census: 93. Findings included: a) Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #28 CNA #28 was hired on 08/30/22. The [NAME] Virginia (WV) Cares…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-08 · tag F0836 — widespread
  Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of legislative rule § 69-10-1 TITLE 69 Rule Department of Health and Human Resources, Series 10 [NAME] Virgnia Clearance for Access: Registry and Employment Screening and staff interview, the facility failed to operate and provide services in compliance with all applicable State and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards and principles that apply to professionals providing services in such a facility. The facility failed to ensure provisional employment screening. The facility also failed to ensure completion of background checks before allowing staff to work and have direct access to the residents. All residents had the potential to be affected. The facility failed to provisionally employ staff pending the [NAME] Virginia Cares fitness determination and the facility failed to require a fingerprint-based background check before hiring staff. The facility had identified and corrected this issue prior to the survey. Staff identifiers: #28, #44, #80, #109, #110, #119 and #127. Facility Census: 93. Findings included:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control standards for the cleaning and disinfecting of the [NAME] Unit and maintaining the storage of clean linen. These were random opportunities for discovery. Facility Census: 95. Findings Include: a) Cleansing Dwell Time On 02/20/24 at 9:25 AM, Housekeeper (HK) #46 on the [NAME] wing was asked what type of cleanser does the facility use for surfaces and floors? HK #46 stated (Name of Cleanser) for the floors and surfaces. HK #46 was then asked, what is the dwell time? HK #46 stated, about 5 (five) minutes . On 02/20/24 at 9:40 AM, the Housekeeping Director (HKD) #41 confirmed the name of the cleanser and the dwell time was 10 minutes .it must remain wet . HKD #41 stated, we have reviewed the dwell times .I'm not sure why HK #46 didn't know. On 02/20/24 at 10:00 AM, the label and directions were reviewed for the facility cleanser. The directions state, Treated surfaces must remain visibly wet for 10 minutes. No further information was obtained during the survey process. b) Linen Cart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to ensure their policy as it pertained to abuse, abuse investigation, and abuse prevention was implemented. Two (2) residents were found to have been abused by being physically restrained. Resident #43 was physically and restrained by a nurse aide who held her head preventing movement so the nurse could perform a swab of the nose to test Resident #43 for COVID. Resident #11 became agitated and a nurse took the resident to her room where they locked the residents wheelchair and physically held the resident's wheelchair preventing her from moving and leaving her room. The state agency (SA) determined these failures caused Resident #11 and Resident #43 to suffer physically and mentally. Neither resident was able to verbalize how these actions made them feel. Not only did these failures harm Resident #11 and Resident #43 but they also placed the remaining 93 residents at risk for serious harm and/or death because both alleged perpetrators were still employed by the facility and actions were not taken to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$104,142 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $104,142 — penalty dated 2024-02-23
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-10 for 34 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV