No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Morgantown Healthcare Center

30 Mon General Drive, Morgantown, WV 26505 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (304) 285-2720 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent May 20251 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1000 Mon Health Medical Park Dr · (304) 599-9400 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1000 Pineview Dr · (304) 598-7535 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.7 mi
500 Suncrest Town Centre Dr · (304) 285-6780 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3 Ira Errett Rodgers Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.9%14.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.1%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.4%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.3%7.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.0%4.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.3%15.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.4%27.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.1%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.7%22.1%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.8%13.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.0%79.4%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.3%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.5%11.3%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.9%CMS range 29.7–47.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.5%CMS range 9.3–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge67.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.5–11.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.051.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
1.13
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.11
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.89
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
51.6%
Total nursing turnover
47.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-02)
24
at the previous standard inspection (2023-06-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. A large chef's knife was found lying on the sink in the dementia care unit. The knife handle was leaned up against the sprayer making it more accessible to the residents. The knife was easily reached and accessed by the Surveyor from the resident's side of the counter. The memory care unit had a census of 24 ambulatory residents with diagnosis of Dementia and/or Alzheimer's Disease. Any of the 24 Residents could have obtained access to the knife potentially causing serious harm and/or death to self or others due to their cognitive impairments and decreased safety awareness. The state agency (SA) determined this to be an immediate jeopardy (IJ) which placed all twenty-four (24) Residents at risk for serious harm and/or death. The facility was notified of the IJ on 06/06/23 at 12:40 PM. The facility submitted a Plan of Correction (POC) at 2:00 PM on 06/06/23 at which time it was accepted by the SA. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-16 · tag F0559 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with a written notice of the room change, including the reason for the change. Additionally, the facility failed to provide the resident with the opportunity to visit the new room prior to relocation. Resident Identifiers: #69 and #70. Facility Census: 118.Findings Include a) Resident #69During an interview on 10/14/25, at approximately 12:45 PM, Resident #69 stated that she had been living in her current room since 04/0/25. She mentioned that on 07/31/25, Administrator #160 informed her that she would need to pay $327.00 a month to remain in her room. Resident #69 expressed that she was unable to afford the additional charge. She conveyed her distress over the situation and informed her daughters about Administrator #160's comments. Resident #69 then motioned to her daughter, who was present in the room, and indicated that she could explain what had happened. Resident's daughter stated that she had spoken with Administrator #160 regarding her mother's stay at the facility. She noted that her mother had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-02 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the dietary staff's appropriate competencies for food service handling. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 116. Findings included: a) Food Safety Certificates The State Food Safety Certificate of training had expired for the Certified Dietary Manager #161 on 02/08/24. -The Certified Dietary Manager #161 renewed the certificate of training on 04/30/25 following survey intervention. The State Food Safety Certificate of training had expired for Dietary Aide #166 on 02/09/24. -On 04/30/25 at 3:44 PM, the Regional Certified Food Manager #189 stated, Dietary Aide #166 had resigned on 04/23/25. Dietary Aide #166 had worked without a Certificate of Training for Food Safety on the following dates:02/10/25, 0214/25, 02/15/25, 02/16/25, 02/17/25, 02/19/25, 02/20/25, 02/21/25, 02/24/25, 02/25/25, 02/25/25, 02/26/25, 02/28/25, 03/01/25, 03/02/25, 03/04/25, 03/05/25, 03/06/25, 03/07/25, 03/10/25, 03/11/25, 03/12/25, 03/14/25, 03/15/25, 03/16/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 116. Findings Included: a) On 04/29/25 at 07:15 AM, the kitchen investigation was initiated. Cookies were found in the freezer with an incomplete date (no year). The Regional Certified Food Manager #189 stated, I'll discard. b) On 04/30/25 at 11:50 AM, the A-Wing pantry was investigated. The following items were found: -[NAME] pickles open and not dated -Cotton candy - open and not dated -Refrigerator temperature 76 degrees Fahrenheit. Items in the pantry were confirmed by Licence Practical Nurse #28 at 12:00 PM. c) On 04/30/25 at 12:01 PM, the B-Wing pantry was investigated. The following items were found: -[NAME] John's sandwich was not sealed or dated with a used by date -Multiple Individual juice cups (Orange, Apple and Cranberry) were not dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections with regards to water management. This practice had the potential to affect all residents that reside in the facility. Facility census: 116. Findings included: a) Water Management During facility record review of the water management revealed, the documentation was not maintained to prevent growth of water borne pathogens including description of the building water system. The flow diagram did not Identify the buildings water systems for which Legionella control measures are needed. No documentation was provided describing the building water systems using text or testing protocols. On 05/05/25 at 2:20 PM, the Maintenance Director verified the facility did not maintain the water management program. He stated that it would be corrected.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, the facility failed to take actions to thoroughly investigate an alleged violation related to physical abuse. Resident identifier #76. Facility census: 116. Findings included: a) Resident #76 A record review found an allegation from 06/06/24 where a staff member allegedly fingerpainted with feces on Resident #76. A reportable was completed with the following details: -On 06/06/24 an anonymous call was placed to the corporate hotline. The caller alleged that a Nurse Aide (NA) defecated on a male resident and drew pictures on the resident with her feces. The anonymous caller may have been a disgruntled employee who believed that this NA got her terminated. During an interview on 04/30/25 at approximately 10:00 AM with the Assistant Administrator, he verified that he helped complete some of the resident interviews after the allegation was reported on 06/06/25. He stated that he was unsure if the allegation had occurred. He continued to state that at the time he believed that it was a disgruntled employee. A review of an investigation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to update Resident #107's care plan for discontinuation of an anticoagulant and to clarify Resident #264's care plan for level of assistance needed for activities of daily living. These failed practices were a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #107 and #264. Census: 116. Findings included: a) Resident #107 On 04/29/25 at 03:56 PM, Resident #107 had an order for Lovenox Injection which was discontinued on 02/17/25. The resident's current care plan (revised 02/18/25) stated, Resident is at risk for abnormal bleeding or hemorrhage due to anticoagulant/antiplatelet use for prophylaxis. Resident will be free from abnormal bleeding / hemorrhaging through review date. Educate resident / resident representative on benefits and potential risks of anticoagulant drug use. Encourage resident to use electric razor when shaving, soft bristled toothbrush. If excessive bleeding / hemorrhage occurs, provide emergency care. Monitor for s/sx [signs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide activities intended to enhance the resident's sense of well-being and to promote or enhance physical, cognitive, and emotional health to ensure the resident's highest practicable state of well-being. Resident Identifier: #110. Facility Census:116. Findings Included: a) Resident #110: Resident #110 was diagnosed with cardiomyopathy, heart failure, hypertension, muscle weakness, localized edema, pain in left and right knees, diabetes mellitus - on insulin, and lack of coordination. During an interview with Resident #110 on 04/29/25 at 2:22 PM, the resident stated that he was unable to get out of bed. Upon being asked what activities he has planned for him, the resident said that there isn't much being offered. He reported that he spends his day lying in bed and sometimes watches TV. A review of Resident #110's Care Plan revealed that residents' activity interests were listed as: -Bingo -Hunting -Fishing -Watching TV -Baking -Cooking -Spending time outside -Gardening An observation on 04/30/25, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to address and notify the physician about an incorrect medication order. It also neglected to ensure that the order was corrected and updated. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Additionally, the facility failed to complete a Speech Therapy Evaluation per physician's order in a timely manner for Resident #107. This was also a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #221 and #107. Facility Census: 116. Findings Included: a) Resident #221 During observation of medication administration on 05/01/25 at 8:45 AM, RN #19 stated that Resident #221 was prescribed 37.5 MG of Metoprolol. RN #19 further stated that the resident would be administered half (½) a tablet. Inspection of the medication revealed that the pharmacy had provided Metoprolol 75 MG tablets. RN #19 administered Metoprolol 37.5 MG (1/2 tablet) during med pass on 05/01/25 at 8:49 AM. At approximately 10:08 AM on 05/01/25, a review of Resident #221's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. This was a random opportunity for discovery of a resident smoking in non-designated areas. Resident Identifier: #79. Facility census 116. Findings included: a) Resident #79 On 04/30/25 at 11:54 AM, surveyor observed Resident #79 smoking outside the front door on the sidewalk. On 05/01/25 at 8:10 AM, there was a second observation of Resident #79 smoking out front of the facility in a non-smoking area. During an interview on 05/01/25 at 8:13 AM, the Assistant Administrator stated that the facility did not have any smokers. During a continued interview on 05/01/25 at 8:15 AM, the Assistant Administrator stated that she was not supposed to be out there smoking, but that's where she goes. He verified at this time that Resident #79 was smoking in a non-smoking area. An observation of the area found no ash can, no fire blanket, nor a fire extinguisher in the vicinity. A No Smoking sign was displayed. During an interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the oxygen concentrator for a resident with a tracheostomy was set to deliver the exact dose of oxygen prescribed by the physician. Resident Identifier: #94. Facility Census: 116. Findings included: a) Resident #94 Resident #94 is diagnosed with the following: -Traumatic Brain Injury -Dependence on supplementary oxygen -Seizures -Epilepsy -Paraplegia -Tracheostomy -Gastrostomy. Physicians Orders stated the following: -Cool air mist via trach collar continuous with O2 bled in at 5LPM -Suction via trach and prn (lung sounds pre and post, O2 sat pre and post) every shift and as needed -Trach-Type Shiley Size 6 -Trach care q shift and prn as needed -Replace inner cannula during trach care q day and prn every shift and as needed -Have the same size trach and one size smaller at bedside at all times -Change trach ties Mon, Wed, Fri, and prn -Change suction tubing and canister once per week and prn - every shift every Fri AND as needed -Change O2 Mask and initial and date tubing - every day shift every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 29 residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process for Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms completed per directions specified by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End-of-Life Care in conjunction with the [NAME] Virginia Health Care Decisions Act (16-30-1). Resident identifiers: #42. Facility census: 116. Findings included: a) Resident #42 Record review on 04/30/25 at 8:55 AM, revealed section for Section D (Signature of Resident, or Guardian /Medical power of Attorney -MPOA Mandatory) was not completed with a MPOA Signature, a verbal signature in place dated 03/03/24 on Resident #42's active Physician Order for Scope of Treatment Form (POST Form). During an interview on 05/01/25 at 10:08 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed Resident #42's POST form was incorrect without an MPOA signature in a timely manner.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect by not providing a dignified dining experience and failing to knock on doors before entering. The facility also failed to treat Resident #35 with dignity and respect during a medication administration. These were random opportunities for discoveries. The practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #111, #56, #4, #87, #57 and #35. Facility Census: 116. Findings Included: A) Policy Review A review of the facility policy titled Residents Rights with no effective or review date revealed the following. .Procedure: I.i. Knock before entering residents room if door is closed-wait for answer. b) Dignified Dining Experience During a main dining room observation on 06/07/23 at 8:05 am two (2) staff members were assisting residents with their breakfast meal while standing beside and towering over them. During an interview on 06/07/23 at 8:08 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON), acknowledged Nurse Aide (NA) #54 and Payroll…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, resident interview, record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable objectives for each resident. This was true for four (4) of 26 residents reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifiers: Resident #86, Resident #44, Resident #97, Resident #96. Facility Census: 116 Findings Included: a) Resident #86 A record review on [DATE] at 9:17 AM, of Resident #86's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Further review of the medical record revealed a care plan with an initiated date of [DATE] which read as follows: Focus: The Resident has little activity involvement the resident is a recent admission to center Goal: Resident will participate in activities of choice through review date. Inventions: Assist with transport to activities as needed. Invite resident to schedule activities. Further medical record review revealed the activity preference interview for admission was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise care plans for Resident #15 regarding discontinuation of anticoagulant use, activities for Resident #100 and behavioral interventions for Resident #60. This was true for three (3) of 26 residents reviewed during the long-term survey process. Resident Identifiers: #15, #100 and #60. Facility Census: 116. Findings Included: a) Resident #15 On 06/07/23 at 11:30 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #15. The record review found the care plan stated, the resident is at risk for abnormal bleeding or hemorrhage due to anticoagulant/antiplatelet use (Lovenox). The review found the anticoagulant was discontinued on 03/15/23. On 06/07/23 at 1:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified and stated, I will get it changed right away. No further information was obtained during the long-term survey process. b) Resident #100 A record review on 06/07/23 at 2:00 PM, of Resident #100's medical record revealed a care plan with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to implement an ongoing resident centered activities program designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This practice was found true for four (4) of ten (10) Residents reviewed for the Activity Care Area during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident Identifier: Resident #86, #44, #100 and #108. Facility Census: 116 Findings Included: a) Resident #86 During the initial tour of the facility on 06/05/23 at 2:15 PM Resident #86 was laying in bed with family present. Family stated Resident watches TV and reads the newspaper and bible daily. But we have not brought his bible here, we thought they would let him borrow one, since he was here for a short stay. They said they receive the newspaper here but have not gotten one to read. During a record review on 06/06/23 at 8:30 PM Resident #86 medical records revealed an activity preference…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide range of motion (ROM) assistance as ordered to ensure the resident maintains, and/or improves to his/her highest level of ROM. This was true for three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed for ROM. Resident identifiers: #53, #71 and #80. Facility Census: 116 Findings Included: a) Resident #53 Record review on 06/06/23 at 1:53 PM showed Resident #53 had an order for: -- Nursing staff to assist with Passive range of motion (ROM) to bilateral lower extremity for exercise. one time a day, This order was dated 12/28/22. Documentation of the last twenty nine (29) days showed Resident #53 received ROM therapy seven (7) days (for a total of 112 minutes), refused nine (9) days, seven (7) days were documentation as not applicable and no documentation for six (6) days. This was confirmed with the Director of Nursing on 06/06/23 at 3:15 PM. The documentation was as follows: 05/08/23 Not applicable 05/09/23 Not applicable 05/10/23 Resident Refused 05/11/23 Resident Refused 05/12/23 received 8 minutes 05/13/23 Received 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated upon opening and kept in proper temperature controls in accordance with the accepted professional standards of practice. These were random opportunities for discovery. Facility Census: 116. Findings Included: a) Temperature Log On 06/06/23 at 8:43 AM, a tour of the medication room was completed on A wing. The medication refrigerator temperature log was not complete. The following dates were left blank: --06/01/23 AM check: no initials or title listed --06/01/23 PM check: no temperature, initials or title listed On 06/06/23 at 9:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified and confirmed the temperature log should be complete. b) A wing medication cart On 06/06/23 at 10:05 AM, the A wing medication cart was reviewed. The following medication was found to be undated upon the initial administration: --Lumigan ophthalmic solution for Resident #21 --Flonase nasal spray for Resident #26 --Lispro insulin Kwik pen for Resident #75 --Lispro insulin Kwik pen for Resident #97…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to provide menu items according to each residents preference. Also the facility failed to provide notification of changes of the menu to residents when the menu needed to be changed. These failed practices had a potential to affect all residents receiving nourishment from the facility kitchen. Resident Identifiers: Resident #27, Resident #80 and Resident #51. Facility Census: 116 Findings Included: a) Menus During a dining observation on 06/06/23 beginning at 12:20 PM on D wing Resident #108's lunch meal ticket revealed they should have had: Spaghetti Caesar Salad Garlic Bread Deluxe Fruit Salad Observations of Resident #108's tray revealed Spaghetti, mixed vegetables, garlic bread and mixed fruit. During an interview on 06/06/23 at 12:50 PM, Nurse Aide (NA) #154 acknowledged there was no Caesar salad on Resident #108 tray. She stated that no one received salad on the tray today. An observation of the menu displayed in the halls for the Residents reads as follows; Spaghetti Caesar Salad Garlic Bread…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to serve food which was palatable and at an accurate temperature. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility Census: 116. Findings Included: a) Kitchen On 06/08/23 six (6) state surveyors tasted the noon time meal for palatability. The Macaroni and Cheese which was the main entrée tasted of a lot of garlic and left the taste on our palates. The tomato basil salad was tasteless and not palatable and also did not contain the onion and bell pepper. The mashed potatoes were also tasteless and not palatable. The beef steak with onions, the onions were still raw and unable to cut. The sugar cookies were very hard, unable to break in half or unable to chew. On 06/08/23 the CM provided recipes, ~Macaroni and Cheese: -American cheese 48 slices -Swiss Cheese 16 slices -Margarine .25 pound -all purpose flour one (1) cup -Milk two (2) quart -Water one and half (1.5) gallon -Vegetable oil one (1) tablespoon (Tbsp) -Salt .50 teaspoon (Tsp) -Macaroni one and half (1.5) pounds…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. The facility failed to label and date food items which were open and failed to dispose of expired food items. The facility also stores non resident foods in the nourishment room refrigerator. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents currently receiving nourishment from the facility's kitchen and the nourishment rooms. Facility Census: 116 Findings Included: A) Policy Review A review of the facility policy titled Food Storage revised date of 09/17 read as following: .Procedures .5. All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated . b) Dry Storage An initial tour of the kitchen with the Culinary Director (CD) beginning on 06/05/23 at 12:16 PM , of the dry storage revealed the following issues: -chili powder- no open/use by date -an open bag of bread crumbs was on the floor. The Culinary Director (CD) acknowledged the failure to label food items with a Date Opened and/or Use by Date. Also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-09 · tag F0839 — pattern
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, professional board interview, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Social Service Director (SSD) was licensed with the [NAME] Virginia Board of Social Work in accordance with applicable state laws. This was a random opportunity for discovery and has a potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility Census: 116. Findings Included: a) Social Service Director On 06/12/23 the facility was asked to provide a professional license or all professional staff including the Social Service Director (SSD) #40. A review of the documentation provided by the facility for SSD #40 found the following: An application for Social Work License (LSW/LGSW/LCSW) this application was completed by SSD #40 on 05/26/23. SSD #40 began working at the facility on 05/04/23 as the SSD. At 3:07 pm on 06/12/23 the [NAME] Virginia Board of Social Work was contacted via telephone. When asked if a person was able to work as social worker prior to their license being approved, the Board Employee indicated you could not start working until your application was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record. The facility failed to ensure the Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms were completed per directions specified by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End of Life Care. This wass true for six (6) of 26 reviewed for the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #109, #97, #44, #16, #51 and #26. Facility census: 116. Findings included: a) Resident #109 During a record review on [DATE] at 10:23 AM Resident #109's medical record revealed a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form showed that verbal consent was obtained from the resident's representative on [DATE]. The consent was not witnessed by two (2) staff members. However, the resident representative's actual signature was never obtained. The 2021 POST form guidance titled, Using the POST Form: Guidance for Health Care Professionals, 2021 edition, available on-line, stated, If the incapacitated patient's MPOA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-09 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to explain the binding arbitration agreement in a form and manner easily understood by residents. This was true for three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed under the care area of arbitration. Resident identifiers: #2, #47, and #44. Facility Census: 116. Findings included: a) Binding Arbitration Agreement On 06/13/23 at 8:30 AM, a review of the facility arbitration agreement was completed. The review found the facility arbitration agreement had all the required information including all definitions of the key words. On 06/13/23 from 8:30 AM to 9:00 AM, three (3) residents (Resident #2, Resident #47 and Resident #44) were interviewed regarding the facility arbitration agreement. All three (3) residents had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, the highest score indicating no cognitive impairment. All three (3) residents stated, I don't know if I signed the agreement and I don't remember what they told me about it. On 06/13/23 at 9:05 AM, an interview was completed with the Admissions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating conditions. The ice machines did not have a one inch air gap for drainage. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents currently receiving nutrition from the facility kitchen. Facility Census: 116 Findings included: a) Ice Machine Drain An initial tour of the kitchen with the Culinary Director (CD) beginning on 06/05/23 at 12:16 PM revealed the ice machine water drain was touching the floor drain without a one (1) inch gap allowing for the potential for contaminants to enter the line and travel to the ice machine. During an interview on 06/07/23 at 10:10 AM Director of Plant Maintenance #49 acknowledged the ice machine did not have a one inch gap, stating it would be fixed immediately. .

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, policy review, family interview and staff interview the facility failed to consider a voiced concern of a residents family as a grievance and failed to act promptly to investigate the voiced concern. This was a random opportunity for discovery and was only true for Resident #270. Resident identifier: #270. Facility Census: 116 Findings included: a) Policy Review A review of the facility policy titled Resident Grievance with a review date of 05/30/19 read as follows: .Procedure: 1. Prevent Ongoing Violations a. Upon receipt of an oral, written or anonymous grievance submitted by a resident, the Grievance Official will take immediate action to prevent further potential violation of any resident right while the alleged violation is being investigated, if indicated. .3. Investigation a. The Grievance Official shall complete an investigation of the resident's grievance. b. This may include a review of facility processes, programs and policies, as well as interviews with staff, residents, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a transfer/discharge notice to the resident/resident representative or the ombudsman for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitalization, during the long term care survey. Resident identifier #75. Census 116. Findings Included: a) Resident #75 Record review on 06/05/23 at 4:16 PM, indicated resident #75 was hospitalized on [DATE]. On 06/06/23 at 11:10 AM, a copy of the transfer/discharge form and bed hold policy that was presented regarding resident's hospitalization on 05/23/23 was requested. On 06/12/23 at 12:09 PM, an interview with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed they did not have a discharge/transfer form or a bed hold policy for this resident's hospitalization on 05/23/23. .

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a bed hold policy to the resident/resident representative for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitalization, during the long term care survey. Resident identifier: #75. Census 116. Findings Included: a) Resident #75 Record review on 06/05/23 at 4:16 PM, indicated Resident #75 was hospitalized on [DATE]. On 06/06/23 at 11:10 AM, a copy of the transfer/discharge form and bed hold policy regarding resident's hospitalization on 05/23/23 was requested. On 06/12/23 at 12:09 PM, an interview with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed they did not have a discharge/transfer form or a bed hold policy for this resident's hospitalization on 05/23/23. .

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (1) of 26 sampled residents reviewed during the long term care survey. Resident identifier: #60. Census:116. Findings included: a) Resident #60 On 06/08/23 at 10:30 AM, a medical record review of Resident #60's MDS indicated the resident did not have behaviors under section E of the MDS. The surveyor reviewed all MDSs since the resident's admission: Quarterly MDS ARD 12/18/22 indicated no behaviors Modification of Quarterly MDS ARD 12/18/22 indicated no behaviors On 06/08/23 at 10:45 AM the surveyor requested from the Director of Nursing (DON), copies of all of the resident's progress notes and MDSs. On 06/12/23 at 2:13 PM, record review of the provided progress notes found notes of behaviors the resident has had throughout his stay. A synopsis of the notes regarding behaviors are listed below: 04/29/23 Behavior Note - paranoid behaviors - called family who came to visit 03/28/23 Behavior Note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a new Pre admission Screening (PAS) when a resident received a new psychiatric diagnosis for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the category of unnecessary medications, psychotropic medications, and medication regimen review, during the long term care survey. Resident identifier #26. Census 116. Findings Included: a) Resident #26 A record review on 06/05/23 at 2:39 PM, provided a completed PAS but no level II needed This PAS was dated 02/23/17 and Section III, number 30 was answered NONE. The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicated, during the resident's stay at the facility, he received a diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder, Current Episode Depressed, Mild or Moderate Severity, Unspecified. This diagnosis was given to the resident on 04/18/2023. There was no updated PAS scanned into the EMR. On 06/06/23 at 11:10 AM, the surveyor requested a copy of the most recent PAS from the Director of Nursing (DON). On 06/06/23 at 12:30 PM, a copy of the most recent PAS was provided to the surveyor. The same PAS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, medical record review, family interview and staff interview the facility failed to provide care required to maintain hygiene to a resident who was dependent for Activities Of Daily Living (ADL) care. This is true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for ADL care are during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifiers: Resident #270. Facility Census: 116 Findings Included: a) Resident #270 During an interview on 06/06/23 at 2:30 PM, Resident #270's representative stated, (Name of Resident # 270's) room smells like urine. Her hair is greasy, and has had no showers since she has been admitted . I spoke to the social worker today about her room and the shower situation. The Social worker stated the resident got two baths a week, If I wanted her to have more I could come in and bathe her. During an observation on 06/06/23 at 3:15 PM, Resident # 270's hair appeared dirty and disheveled. During an observation on 06/07/23 at 8:30 AM, Resident # 270's hair still appeared dirty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow their suicide prevention policy for one (1) of 26 sampled residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier #75. Census 116. Findings Included: a) Resident #75 On 06/06/23 at 11:10 AM, the surveyor requested a copy of the resident's psychiatric notes/evaluations, copy of care plans, copy of pharmacy recommendations, and a copy of the resident's Pre admission Screening (PAS). Record review revealed the resident had suicidal ideation's since he had been at the facility. Resident #75 was admitted to facility on 10/12/22. On 10/18/2022 at 4:29 PM, Social Worker #172 documented in a progress note, During trauma informed care screening resident stated suicidal ideation multiple times. Resident stated he has thoughts and feelings of not wanting to be alive r/t to feeling like he is not getting progress out of SNF placement. Social worker inquired if he had a plan, and resident held his finger to his head in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided according to professional standards of practice. This was a random opportunity for discovery and was only true for Resident #32. Resident Identifier: #32. Facility Census: 116. Findings Included: a) Resident #32 On 06/05/23 at 12:45 PM, an observation was made of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask laying on top of the CPAP machine. The CPAP mask was not stored in a respiratory bag. Resident #32 stated, It has never been put in a bag. Registered Nurse (RN) #108 confirmed the CPAP mask was not being stored in a respiratory bag. RN #108 stated, let me get one. On 06/06/23 at 2:40 PM, an additional observation was made of the CPAP mask laying on top of CPAP machine. The CPAP mask was not stored in a respiratory bag. The resident was not present in the room. Licensed Practical Nurse LPN) #145 confirmed the CPAP mask was not being stored in a respiratory bag. LPN #145 stated, I'll go get one. The care plan was reviewed regarding the CPAP machine. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a resident on the memory unit with an alternate meal preference during lunch. This was a random opportunity for discovery and only affected Resident #93. Resident identifier: #93. Facility census: 116. Findings included: a) Resident #93 On 06/05/23 at 1:31 PM, Resident #93 pushed her lunch plate to the side. Resident #93 said to Nurse Aide (NA) #84, They told me I could have a sandwich. NA #84 told the Resident They are not the boss; you eat what you have on your plate. Resident dropped her head, and her bottom lip began to quiver. The Resident got tears in her eyes as she sat and watched her table mates eat their lunch. Activity Director #45 was asked what happens when a resident wants something else to eat? AD #45 stated to NA #84 Are you going to call the kitchen and see if there is something else she can have, maybe a mechanical snack? AD #45 stated due to her diet she could not have a sandwich. AD #45 said, she does this all the time. The diet ticket stated: Regular Dysphasia/Puree Diet. At…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Proper infection control procedures were not taken during medication pass on the memory unit. Family was not provided with the proper personal protective equipment during visitation to Resident's room. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents and was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: #35 and #104. Facility census: 116. Findings included: a) Resident #35 On 06/06/23 at 8:52 AM, during observation of medication pass on the memory unit, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #62 placed Resident # 35's eye drops and nasal spray on the seat of a empty cushioned chair in the common living room while she administered the residents oral medications. LPN #35 did not put a barrier down or sanitize the surface prior to placing the multiuse medications on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to treat one (1) of the 28 sample residents in the long-term care survey process with dignity and respect. The facility insisted Resident #55 must wear a large blue brief instead of a smaller size. As a result, Resident #55's brief leaked throughout the night resulting in Resident #55's bed being saturated with urine. Resident Identifier: Resident #55. Facility Census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #55 During an interview, on 10/11/21 at 11:55 AM, Resident #55 stated Nurse Aide (NA) #106 insists resident wear a large brief which does not fit Resident #55 comfortably. Resident #55 weighs approximately 112 pounds, and the large brief is looser fitting and bulges in some areas. Resident #55 then showed surveyor the blue brief the resident was wearing to demonstrate how it fit. Resident #55 stated as a result of wearing large briefs, the brief leaked last night resulting in the bedding becoming wet. Resident #55 reported not only was it embarrassing but it also interrupted quality sleep time needing to wait for the NA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment by not providing a resident reachable access to a personal telephone. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #89. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #89 During an interview on 10/11/21 at 11:55 AM, Resident #89, stated, I can't reach my phone when I get phone calls. Resident #89 stated that the personal phone was out of reach most days. An observation on 10/11/21 at 11:55 AM found Resident #89's personal phone sat on the nightstand beside the bed. The nightstand was positioned at the head of the bed making the personal phone out of reach for Resident #89. An interview on 10/11/21 at 3:55 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #139, confirmed Resident #89's phone was out of reach and will care plan that the phone is to be in reach at all times. .

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 28 residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process had a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form completed per directions specified by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End-of-Life Care in conjunction with the [NAME] Virginia Health Care Decisions Act (16-30-1). Resident identifier: Resident #69. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #69 A medical record review was completed on 10/11/21 at 1:15 PM. A [NAME] Virginia Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form, signed and dated 01/04/21, was in the chart. Section C, entitled Medically Administered Fluids and Nutrition, was left completely blank. Section C offers the patient the opportunity to indicate if they do or do not desire IV fluids as well as the opportunity to indicate if they do or do not wish to have a feeding tube. In 2002, the POST form was incorporated into the [NAME] Virginia Health Care Decisions Act (16-30-25.) POST forms are standardized forms used to reflect orders by a qualified physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide one (1) of 28 sample residents a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility failed to change a soiled privacy curtain in a timely fashion. Resident identifier: #62. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #62 During a resident interview, on 10/11/21 at 11:39 AM, Resident #62 pointed out over 20 small, brown stains, ranging from the size of a pencil eraser to a quarter, on the privacy curtain in the middle of the room. Resident #62 stated that the stains have been there for several days and wished it could be cleaned. Registered Nurse (RN) #26 entered Resident #62's room on 10/11/21 at 11:46 AM and stated that she would guess the brown spots were soy sauce, noting they had Chinese food several days ago. RN #26 acknowledged it is the responsibility of all facility staff to create a homelike environment and promptly address any cleaning needs when identified. RN #26 stated the dirty privacy curtain will be changed out for a clean one and then sent to laundry.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident fall resulting in a fracture was reported to the required agencies. This was true for one (1) of five (5) falls reviewed. Resident identifier: Resident #304. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #304 An electronic health record review was completed on 10/12/21 at 9:23 AM. Resident #304 experienced a fall on 11/25/20 at 9:15 AM. A subsequent x-ray revealed Resident #304 had sustained a hip fracture during the fall. Resident #304 was then transferred to the hospital for treatment. A review of the November 2021 Reportables log revealed the facility had not reported the fall with major injury. During an interview, on 10/12/21 at 1:15 PM, the Administrator reported, We didn't report the fall with fracture. At that time, we weren't reporting falls that were sent out of the building. The Administrator further explained corporate guidance was later provided and clarification given. The facility began reporting falls sent out of the building in May 2021. The Federal regulation 483.12(c)(1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence a resident/resident's representative was provided a written Notice of Transfer for an acute hospital transfer. This was true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for hospitalization. Resident identifiers: #69 and #304. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #69 A medical record review was completed on 10/12/21 at 11:32 AM. The record review revealed Resident #69 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. The record did not reflect the resident/resident's representative was provided a written Notice of Transfer indicating the reason for the transfer, the effective date of transfer, the location to which the resident was being transferred and a statement of the resident's appeal rights. During an interview on 10/12/21 at 1:45 PM, the Medical Records Director reported the facility was unable to provide evidence a written Notice of Transfer was provided to Resident #69. a) Resident #304 A medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence a resident/resident's representative was provided a written Bed Hold Notice upon transfer. This was true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for hospitalization. Resident identifiers: #69 and #304. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #69 A medical record review was completed on 10/12/21 at 9:23 AM. The record review revealed Resident #304 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. The record did not reflect the resident/resident's representative was provided a written Bed Hold Notice upon transfer. During an interview on 10/12/21 at 1:45 PM, the Medical Records Director reported the facility was unable to provide evidence a written Bed Hold Notice was provided to Resident #69. b) Resident #304 A medical record review was completed on 10/12/21 at 11:32 AM. The record review revealed Resident #304 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. The record did not reflect the resident/resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice. A nebulizer mask was on the bedside table with no protective covering. This observation was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #57. Facility Census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #57 An observation on 10/11/21 at 11:38 AM found Resident #57's nebulizer mask on the bedside table with no protective covering. Registered Nurse (RN) #26 confirmed the nebulizer mask was uncovered and stated that facility protocol required the nebulizer mask to be placed in a bag. RN #26 went on to say the nebulizer machine had not been used for over a month and should have been removed from the resident's room. .

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-13 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a two (2) handled spouted cup for a resident at meal times. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #70. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #70 An observation on 10/12/21 at 8:10 AM showed Resident #70 had two (2) eight (8) ounce cups of liquid on the breakfast tray. Resident #70 was unable to drink out of the two (2) cups and struggled with one cup not being able to get the drink as desired. Further observation on 10/12/21 at 8:10 AM of Resident #70's food tray showed a tray card that stated, 2 handled cup (1 each). An interview on 10/12/21 at 8:25 AM, Speech Therapist (ST) #169 stated that the two (2) cups on Resident #70's trays were not correct or recommended by therapy. ST #169 stated that the cups on Resident #70's tray should be the two (2) handled spouted cups with handles on both sides. A review of Resident #70's medical recorded verified a care plan that stated, Spouted cups with all meals. The therapy recommendation note also verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, label and date foods in a sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Facility Census 105 . Findings included: a) Kitchen/Pantries On 10/11/21 at 11:13 AM initial tour with Food Service Director (FSD) #5, an observation of the walk in refrigerator found no label or date on the following food items: bacon, sausage gravy, egg omelets, cheese slices were wrapped in plastic and opened shredded cheese. The FSD agreed that all items should be discarded due to not being labeled or dated. On 10/11/21 at 11:28 AM observation with FSD in the walk in freezer found veal wrapped in plastic wrap with no date. The FSD agreed the frozen veal should have been thrown away and the FSD discarded the veal. On 10/11/21 at 11:40 AM observation with FSD on PAC unit pantry refrigerator found the following: -one (1) container with no name or date and three (3) small food containers with no name or date. On 10/11/21 at 11:55 AM an observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for one (1) of 28 sample residents reviewed during the Long Term Care Survey. Resident identifier: #97 Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #97 Resident #97 was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included dementia, Alzheimer's, and major depressive disorder. The Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored 00 on the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 07/01/21. The BIMS score indicates severe cognitive impairment. In an interview with Resident #97's family member on 10/12/21 at 11:28 AM revealed Resident #97 had dental posts placed with the lower denture inserted in the lower jaw in 2016. A review of the physician orders during this survey found an order dated 04/10/19 for Check dentures for all 0-rings and replace any missing 0-rings three (3) times daily. 0-rings are in nurses cart. (Completed by Nurse Only). In an interview with Resident #97's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe environment by the use of an extension cord connected to an electronic device for Resident #100. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #100. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #100 An observation on 10/11/21 at 1:42 PM found an extension cord from the electrical outlet to an electronic tablet device on the bed of Resident #100. Based on an interview on 10/11/21 at 1:43 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #22 stated that no electrical extension cords are permitted for safety reasons. LPN #22 removed the extension cord from the residents room. .

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH 3 of 5Charleston Healthcare CenterCharleston, WV

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GROVES, DONNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2023
STOLTZ, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2022
WILHEIM, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2022
MON GENERAL MGT CO., LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022
HAMRICK, TRISTAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/25/2025
KRUPICA, TROYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2014
ODENTHAL, RICHARDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/03/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.1M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 9%Other / private 16%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$432per resident / day
operating cost
$13,118per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$471per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515058. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next