No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Dixon Healthcare Center

135 Reichart Avenue, Wintersville, OH 43953 · For profit - Corporation · 85 certified beds · (740) 264-1155 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0565, F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$250,817 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567)
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (90) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $250,817 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-21)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
227 Canton Rd · (740) 266-2161 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
503 Cadiz Rd · (740) 264-6500 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger1.1 mi
858 Main St · (740) 264-3248 · Call to confirm hours
Park
399 Marshall Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
110 Springdale Ave · (740) 264-9679

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.3%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms14.4%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.9%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.2%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.9%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.5%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.6%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.1%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.1%8.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine76.9%75.6%79.4%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.021.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.371.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.8%CMS range 27.1–52.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 6.6–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified81.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.151.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.88
RN hours/ resident / day
0.73
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.87
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.63
RN hoursweekends
61.2%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 54.5 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-21)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

90 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 74 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of hospital records, review of Medscape medical reference information, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to protect Resident #64's right to be free from neglect. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm with subsequent death beginning on [DATE] when the facility failed to provide timely and appropriate goods and services to meet Resident #64's total care and medical needs and failed to ensure the resident received timely and necessary care and treatment to prevent serious illness and death. On [DATE] Resident #64 returned from the hospital with orders for Lasix (diuretic) 20 milligrams (mg) daily and basic metabolic profile (BMP) laboratory test to be completed on [DATE]. The orders for Lasix and the BMP were not initiated or completed per the hospital discharge orders. On [DATE], Resident #64 was ordered additional laboratory testing, including thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), Vitamins B1, B6, and B12, plasma, folate, and Vitamin D and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, facility policy and procedure review, and interview, the facility failed to provide timely, necessary and adequate care and services following an acute change in condition involving Resident #63. The facility failed to ensure changes in the residents' medical condition were comprehensively assessed, the resident change in condition, including abnormal vital signs, was communicated to the medical health provider, and individualized interventions were implemented for Resident #63 when the resident was identified by therapy staff to have a decline in health including tachycardia, hypoxemia, and excessive daytime sleepiness and lethargy. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm with subsequent death beginning on [DATE] at approximately 12:30 P.M. when Resident #63 had hypoxemia, increased sleepiness, lethargy, and tachycardia while sitting at rest in therapy without adequate intervention. On [DATE] following an inability to complete therapy, Resident #63 returned to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of hospital records, review of an emergency medical service (EMS) report and EMS staff statements, review of facility Self Reported Incidents, review of a facility investigation, review of the facility dialysis policy and procedure, review of the facility Abuse/Neglect policy and procedure and interviews with staff, the coroner, and resident, the facility failed to prevent an incident of neglect when Resident #72 did not receive timely and necessary care to prevent major blood loss from his hemodialysis fistula site. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm with subsequent death beginning on [DATE], when Resident #72, who had intact cognition and required hemodialysis, was seen by dialysis staff, picking at his fistula site. The resident was educated not to pick at it and the resident stated he was a picker. Dialysis staff submitted a communication to the nursing home staff regarding the picking incident. The night shift nurse noted the resident asked for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, emergency room record review, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of the facility investigation, review of the news broadcast at https://wtov9.com/news, employee code of conduct review, staff interviews, resident interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to prevent staff to resident sexual abuse. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for actual physical and psychosocial harm on 08/08/24 at approximately 11:10 A.M. when Hospitality Aide (HA) #286 witnessed an incident of potential sexual abuse between Maintenance Director (MD) #300 and Resident #1, a resident with a court appointed legal guardian due to mental incapacity with a known history of hypersexual tendencies. On 08/08/24 HA #286 observed Resident #1 sitting in her room on the floor, with the door closed and Maintenance Director (MD) #300…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on open and closed medical record review, facility policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to timely identify a change in resident condition and notify the medical provider to prevent a delay in treatment/timely medical intervention. The facility also failed to ensure bowel protocols were implemented for residents on hospice services. Actual harm occurred on 03/11/26 when Resident #54, who had bilateral nephrostomy tubes and history of kidney disease, experienced a decline in functional status, decreased urine output from the nephrostomy tubes, and decreased food and fluid intake without evidence of necessary and timely medical intervention or notification to the resident's medical provider. When ordered laboratory work was obtained (five days after ordered) the resident had a critical creatinine level (blood test for monitoring kidney function with normal results between 0.6 to 1.3) of 4.9, was hypotensive (low blood pressure) and tachycardic (increased heart rate). The Nurse Practitioner…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program to ensure the accurate identification of pressure ulcers, on-going assessment and monitoring, adequate treatment and effective interventions to timely identify and treat pressure ulcers for Resident #4. Actual Harm occurred on 11/24/23 when Resident #4, who was cognitively intact, paraplegic, required partial to moderate assistance with bed mobility and was identified by the facility as having systolic congestive heart failure placing him at high risk for developing pressure ulcers, was assessed by the Wound Nurse Practitioner (NP) #500 to have a new unstageable (full thickness loss of tissue completely covered by dead tissue) pressure ulcer to the left posterior thigh measuring 4.0 centimeters (cm) by 5.0 cm by 0.1 cm with 100 percent eschar (dead tissue). No further measurements were obtained of the left posterior thigh pressure ulcer until…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-21 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on open and closed medical record review, review of notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and//or Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (ABN), review of beneficiary protection notification review form, and interview the facility failed to ensure NOMNC's included Quality Improvement Organization (independent reviewer authorized by Medicare to review the decision to end these services) name and contract information, NOMNC and ABN was provided and or provided timely. This affected four residents (Resident's #7, #39 #60, and #61) of four residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification review. The facility census was 51.1. Closed medical record review revealed Resident #60's was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of left femur fracture, heart failure, diabetes, convulsions, head injury, and hypothyroidism. Review of the beneficiary protection notification review form completed by the facility on 04/14/26 revealed the resident last covered day of Part A service was 12/09/25 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the infection control log, policy review, interviews, and observation the facility failed to ensure the infection control log was comprehensive and failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were maintained during incontinence care. This affected three (Resident #7, #9, and #13) of four residents reviewed for infections and one (Resident #1) of one residents observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1.Record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, anemia, and cellulitis. Review of Resident #13's urinalysis dated 04/02/26 revealed on 04/02/26 the urine was collected and abnormal findings were reported on 04/03/26. The abnormal findings included: the urine was light orange in color, extra turbid, plus one ketones, plus three blood, protein plus one, positive nitrite, plus four positive, 21-50 red blood cells, greater than 50 white…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident representative of a newly identified pressure wound. This affected one (Resident #4) of one resident reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 51.Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, diabetes mellitus, hemiparesis and hemiplegia following cerebrovascular disease, anoxic brain damage, and seizures.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/11/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS further revealed Resident #4 required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the admission record revealed Resident #4's mother (Family Member #208) was listed as the resident's emergency contact and medical power of attorney.Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the as needed (prn) order for a psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days. This affected one (Resident #19) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, psychoactive substance-induced psychotic disorder, chronic pain, and fibromyalgia. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/01/26, revealed the resident had intact cognition and a diagnosis of anxiety disorder. Review of the physician orders revealed an order, dated 06/17/25, for Ativan 0.5 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for anxiety. Review of the June and July 2025 Medication Administration Records (MAR) revealed Resident #19 received Ativan 0.5 mg one tablet by mouth on 06/17 through 06/24/25 and 06/26/25 through 06/30/25; and on 07/01/25 through 07/10/25. The prn psychotropic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) document accurately reflected all diagnoses. This affected one (Resident #19) of one resident reviewed for PASRR documents. The census was 52. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, psychoactive substance-induced psychotic disorder, chronic pain, and fibromyalgia. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/01/26, revealed the resident had intact cognition and a diagnosis of anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #19's PASRR document, dated 02/01/24, revealed under Section E: Indications of Serious mental Illness, no was selected incorrectly indicating there was not a diagnosis of mental illness. Review of the resident's diagnoses list revealed the diagnosis of anxiety disorder and psychoactive substance-induced psychotic disorder.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided as scheduled for a dependent resident. This affected one (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). The facility census was 51. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, chronic kidney disease, cervical disk degeneration, diabetes mellitus, chronic pain, and morbid obesity. Review of the 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/18/26, revealed Resident #2 had moderately impaired cognition and required physical staff assistance with ADL's. Review of the care plan, dated 02/28/26, revealed Resident #2 had an ADL self-care performance deficit and required physical assistance of two staff members for showers and baths. Observation and interview on 04/06/26 at 10:30 A.M revealed Resident #2 had excess oil noted in his hair and was wearing a hospital gown. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record review and Bureau of Motor Vehicles document review the facility failed to assist Resident #9 in obtaining a state photo identification. This affected one resident (Resident #9) of one residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 51. Findings include:Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/25/23 with diagnoses that included pressure ulcer to the sacrum, diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed an intact and independent cognition level. Review of Ohio Department of Public Safety BMV form dated 01/08/25 revealed the BMV needed an affidavit from the provider that expressed the customer was homebound and unable to travel to the Deputy Registrar's Office. Upon receipt of the above, a license/identification card would be issued and mailed. Interview with Resident #9 on 04/06/26 at 12:59 P.M. revealed the facility still had not helped him…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a monthly regimen review (MRR) pharmacy recommendation for a psychotropic medication's 14-day stop date was addressed by the physician. This affected one (Resident #19) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, psychoactive substance-induced psychotic disorder, chronic pain, and fibromyalgia. Review of the physician orders revealed an order, dated 04/24/25, for Ativan 0.5 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for anxiety. The order did not include a 14-Day stop date. The medication was discontinued on 06/15/25. Review of the Monthly Regimen Reviews (MRR), dated 05/30/25, revealed the pharmacist recommended a 14-day stop date for the use of Ativan 0.5 mg every six hours as needed (prn) for anxiety; or a documented rationale if the prescriber believed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and review of laboratory contract the facility failed to ensure ordered urine culture and sensitivity laboratory testing was completed timely. This affected one (Resident #13) of one residents reviewed for urinary tract infection. The facility census was 51. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, anemia, and cellulitis. Review of Resident #13's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter, occasionally incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. The indwelling urinary catheter was discontinued 03/06/26. Review of Resident #13's urinalysis/culture dated 04/02/26 revealed on 04/02/26 the urine was collected and abnormal findings were reported on 04/03/26. The abnormal findings included: the urine was light orange in color, extra turbid (cloudy), plus one ketone, plus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, review of infection control log, and policy review the facility failed to ensure an effective antibiotic stewardship program to ensure residents met criteria for antibiotic treatment. This affected one (Resident #13) of four residents reviewed for infections. The facility census was 51.Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, anemia, and cellulitis.Review of Resident #13's significant change MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter, occasionally incontinent of urine and frequency incontinent of bowel. The urinary catheter was discontinued 03/06/26.Review of Resident #13's urinalysis/culture dated 04/02/26 revealed on 04/02/26 the urine was collected and abnormal findings were reported on 04/03/26. The abnormal findings included: the urine was light orange in color, extra turbid (cloudy), plus one ketones, plus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 74 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, observation and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was free from misappropriation. This affected one (Resident #3) of three records reviewed. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant neoplasm of left bronchus or lung, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, depression, urinary incontinence, anxiety, dysphagia, aphasia, dementia, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia, and stage two chronic kidney disease. The resident was under hospice services.Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating the resident was cognition intact.Review of census revealed Resident #3 was moved from room [ROOM NUMBER]-2 to room [ROOM NUMBER]-2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the Ohio Gateway system (online system for reporting abuse) and facility policy review, the facility failed timely to report allegation of misappropriation to the state agency. This affected one (Resident #3) of three residents reviewed. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant neoplasm of left bronchus or lung, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, depression, urinary incontinence, anxiety, dysphagia, aphasia, dementia, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia, and stage two chronic kidney disease. The resident was under hospice services.Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating the resident was cognition intact.Review of census…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, observation and facility policy review the facility failed to investigate allegation of misappropriation. This affected one (Resident #3) of three residents reviewed.Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant neoplasm of left bronchus or lung, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, depression, urinary incontinence, anxiety, dysphagia, aphasia, dementia, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia, and stage two chronic kidney disease. The resident was under hospice services.Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating the resident was cognition intact.Review of census revealed the resident was moved from room [ROOM NUMBER]-2 to room [ROOM NUMBER]-2 on Unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of work order, interview, observation and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure bilateral enabler bars were in-place per orders to prevent Resident #3 from falling out of bed twice. This affected one (Resident #3) of three records reviewed for accidents. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant neoplasm of left bronchus or lung, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, depression, urinary incontinence, anxiety, dysphagia, aphasia, dementia, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia, and stage two chronic kidney disease. The resident was under hospice services.Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating the resident was cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were ordered timely and available for residents. This affected one resident (Resident #7) of four residents reviewed for pharmacy services. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #7 admitted to the facility 10/10/19 with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness, insomnia, neuropathy, quadriplegia, muscle spasms, neuromuscular bladder dysfunction, and hyperkalemia.Record review of Resident #7 quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment completed 08/14/25 revealed the resident's cognition was intact, had no observed or exhibited behaviors, was dependent for toileting, showering, bathing, lower body dressing, and personal hygiene, and was dependent or required maximum assistance for mobility. MDS revealed Resident #7 received an opioid medication. Review of quarterly care plan initiated on 11/09/21 and revised on 08/25/25 revealed Resident #7 had complaints of chronic pain related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of pest invoices, review of concerns submitted to the state survey agency complaint intake unit, interviews, observation, and review of facility policy revealed the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was maintained. This had the potential to affect all 63 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:1 a. Review of concerns submitted to the state survey agency complaint intake unit dated 06/13/25 and 07/10/25 revealed a concern with cockroaches in the kitchen. Review of the pest control invoice dated 06/10/25 revealed the building was inspected for services including all interior areas for possible pest entry ways and activity. All glue boards were replaced as needed. Open area of concern was noted in the kitchen. The wall covering was loose/peeling. Wall tile was cracked and there were gaps between baseboards and wall. These areas need repaired or replaced to help prevent pest entry and harbor sites. The kitchen door seal was not rodent proof. The seal needed repaired. There were German Cockroaches noted to be found on the devices.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-29 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of funds list, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to personal funds after business hours and on weekends. This affected four residents (#4, #22, #30 and #36) of four residents reviewed for personal funds managed by the facility. The facility census was 63.Findings include:Review of the facility funds list dated 07/08/25 revealed Residents #4, #22, #30, and #36 each had a personal funds account with the facility. Observation and interview on 07/08/25 at 7:26 A.M., with HR #153 confirmed she was responsible for dispensing resident funds. The surveyor requested to observe the money box for resident funds. HR #153 confirmed she did not leave a money box for staff after she left Tuesday at 5:00 P.M. The HR reported she leaves the money box on the weekends in the medical room, however, could not recall which staff member she had given to the box to the week prior. HR #153 reported most of the resident know they need to get money out before she leaves at the end of the day. Interview on 07/08/25 at 7:30 A.M., with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of self-reported incidents (SRI), interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of Resident #48's narcotic pain patches. This affected one resident (#48) of three residents reviewed for controlled medications. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hospice services, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes, absence of eye and above right knee, anxiety, peripheral vascular disease, aphasia, bursitis of right elbow, and heart disease. Review of Resident #48's orders dated 03/31/25 to present revealed Fentanyl (an opioid analgesic) 50 microgram (mcg) patch. Instructions stated to apply one patch topically to the resident's upper torso every 72 hours routinely for pain. Review of Resident #48's admission assessment completed 03/31/25 revealed the resident was not capable of verbalizing pain. The resident was noted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely investigate an injury of unknown origin. This affected one resident (#31) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 63. Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia with other behavioral disturbance, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, anxiety, depression, paranoid schizophrenia, and nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Review of Resident #31's skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had skin tear on the left elbow measuring 2.0 centimeter (cm) in length by one cm in width by 0.1 cm depth. The diagnoses was fragile skin. Review of Resident #31's order dated 07/02/25 revealed to cleanse the left elbow with normal saline, pat dry, apply xeroform (a non-adherent gauze dressing) and cover with silicone boarder foam dressing. Instructions included to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that adequate care and treatment was provided for a resident with left arm edema and failed to ensure bruising was assessed and documented. This affected one resident (#31) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 63. Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia with other behavioral disturbance, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, anxiety, depression, paranoid schizophrenia, and nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Review of Resident #31's progress notes dated 07/04/25 to 07/06/25 revealed no evidence the resident had left arm edema. Review of Resident #31 progress note dated 07/07/25 at 12:35 P.M., revealed the resident had a telehealth visit completed for concern of a swollen left arm. Nurse Practitioner (NP) #200 ordered a doppler (a non-invasive ultrasound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents received effective pain management. This affected three residents (#48, #61, and #65) of three residents reviewed that received pain patches. Findings include:1. Medical record review revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hospice services, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes, absence of eye and above right knee, anxiety, peripheral vascular disease, aphasia, bursitis of right elbow, and heart disease. Review of Resident #48's admission assessment completed [DATE] revealed the resident was not capable of verbalizing pain. The resident was displaying non-verbal indicators of pain. The resident was receiving scheduled pain medication. Review of Resident #48's aphasia plan of care dated [DATE] and revised [DATE] revealed the resident had a communication problem. Interventions included observing/document for physical/nonverbal indicators of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure narcotic medication (pain patches) were properly disposed of. This affected two residents (#48 and #65) of three residents reviewed that received narcotic pain patches. The facility census was 63.Findings include:1. Medical record review revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes, absence of eye and above right knee, anxiety, peripheral vascular disease, aphasia, bursitis of right elbow, and heart disease. Review of Resident #48's orders dated [DATE] to [DATE] revealed Fentanyl (narcotic medication) 50 microgram (mcg) patch. Apply one patch topically to upper torso every 72 hours for pain. Review of Resident #48's Fentanyl 50 mcg control drug record dated [DATE] to [DATE] revealed on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], unknown date (no date documented), [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to notify a family and physician of a resident fall. This affected one resident (#64) of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed a 09/25/23 admission with diagnoses including chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, type two diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux, disease, hypertension, hypothyroidism, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, cardiomyopathy, personal history of transient ischemic attacks without residual deficits, depression, dysphasia, neuropathy Non-rheumatic mitral valve stenosis and dementia. Review of a 05/09/25 quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS) revealed the resident was severely impaired for daily decision-making with hallucinations, verbal behavior symptoms one to three of the look back days. She said no upper or lower body functional impairment. The resident was dependent on staff for oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, and on upper and lower body dressing and personal hygiene. She was dependent on staff for locomotion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, hospice communication review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependent on staff for care received showers per preference. This affected one resident (#64) of three residents reviewed for showers. Findings include: Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed a 09/25/23 admission with diagnoses including chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, type two diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux, disease, hypertension, hypothyroidism, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, cardiomyopathy, personal history of transient ischemic attacks without residual deficits, depression, dysphasia, neuropathy Non-rheumatic mitral valve stenosis and dementia. The resident had a 04/15/24 Self Care Performance plan of care related to cognition and functional deficits. The resident was totally dependent on staff for bathing. Review of a 05/09/25 quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS) revealed the resident was severely impaired for daily decision-making with hallucinations,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, Sheriff report review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident needs were met related to a fall and supervision was provided related to resident safety. This affected two residents(#42 and #64) of seven residents reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed a 09/25/23 admission with diagnoses including chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, type two diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux, disease, hypertension, hypothyroidism, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, cardiomyopathy, personal history of transient ischemic attacks without residual deficits, depression, dysphasia, neuropathy, non-rheumatic mitral valve stenosis and dementia. Review of a 05/09/25 quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS) revealed the resident was severely impaired for daily decision-making with hallucinations, verbal behavior symptoms one to three of the look back days. She had no upper or lower body functional impairment. The resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide evidence the physician conducted in-person examination of all residents. This affected one resident (#51) of three residents reviewed for physician documentation. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Record review of Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 10/04/24. Diagnoses include Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (nerve pain), Asthma, Morbid Obesity, Bipolar Disorder, Atrial Fibrillation (an abnormal hearth rhythm), Acute Respiratory Failure, Hypertension (high blood pressure), and Hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 was admitted to the facility from a short-term general hospital. Review of the progress notes since admission revealed no notes in the electronic medical record written by the Medical Director #1 who was the attending physician for Resident #51. Interview with the director of nurse (DON) #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate resident medical records. This affected two residents (#42 and #64) of seven residents reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed a 09/25/23 admission with diagnoses including chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, type two diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux, disease, hypertension, hypothyroidism, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, cardiomyopathy, personal history of transient ischemic attacks without residual deficits, depression, dysphasia, neuropathy Non-rheumatic mitral valve stenosis and dementia. Interview on 05/22/25 at 5:31 P.M. with Resident #64's daughter revealed she had an electronic monitoring device with a camera in her mother's room. She stated she saw her mother on the floor on camera footage and did not receive a call about a fall. She showed the footage to the Director of Nursing who said she did not know about the fall. Interview on 05/22/25 at 5:57…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure contact isolation precautions were implemented for a resident with a multi drug resistant organism with drainage that was not contained. This affected one resident (#63) of seven residents reviewed for infection control practices. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 03/28/25 with diagnoses of cellulitis, morbid severe obesity (410 pounds (lbs) on 04/21/25), cor pulmonale, congestive heart failure, hypertension, respiratory failure, acute and chronic renal failure, adult failure to thrive, psychoactive substance abuse, Stage 3 chronic kidney disease, chronic venous insufficiency, iron deficiency anemia, and lymphedema. Review of a Medical Director order dated 03/29/25 revealed Resident #63 was admitted to the facility for skilled level of care with therapy and/or nursing services. He was receiving oral and intravenous antibiotics for cellulitis to right posterior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of facility Self Reported Incidents, review of facility investigation, interview with staff, interview with residents, and review of faciliy policy and procedure, the facility failed to report an allegation of staff to resident sexual abuse to the State agency. This affected one resident (Resident #71) out of five residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Finding included: Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, diabetes, neuropathy, hepatitis C, hypertension, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, complete traumatic amputation between the elbow and wrist of the left arm and phantom limb syndrome. Resident #71 was his own responsible party. Review of the plan of care dated 06/14/24 revealed no documentation of inappropriate sexual behaviors being exhibited by the resident. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, interview with staff, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to follow physician's orders to monitor the dialysis fistula bruit and thrill for Resident #72. This affected one resident (Resident #72) of three reviewed for dialysis. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hypertensive heart, end stage renal disease with dialysis, diabetes, hypothyroidism, dementia, major depressive disorder, hydronephrosis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and mood disorder. He was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] where he later expired. Review of the physician order dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 had an order to check his dialysis graft site for bruit and thrill every shift. Review of the hemodialysis care plan dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 was receiving hemodialysis therapy related to renal failure and he had an AV fistula to the left upper extremity. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the medical record, interview with staff, and review of manufacture guidelines, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below five percent (%). There were two medication errors out of 29 opportunities for error, equaling a medication error rate of 6.9 %. This affected two residents (#59 and #66) of five residents (Resident #6, #48, #52, #59 and #66) observed for medication administration. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dyspnea, and schizophrenia. Review of the March 2025 physician's orders revealed Resident #66 had an order dated 09/21/23 for Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol inhalation powder 250/50 micrograms (mcg) with instructions to administer one puff twice daily for COPD, and swish and spit after usage. Observation of medication administration on 03/11/25 at 7:30 A.M. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure isolation laundry was handled and sanitized properly, failed to ensure infection control was maintained and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented during tracheostomy care for Resident #53 and during medications administration for Resident #37. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility who used the facility laundry, affected one resident (Resident #53) of two reviewed for tracheostomy care and affected one resident (Resident #37) of one observed for tube feeding medication administration. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the infection control surveillance logs revealed the last resident on isolation was on 08/20/24 for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus and the last clostridium difficile was on 06/14/24. On 12/19/24 at 9:57 A.M. an interview with Laundry Staff #302 revealed she would go out to the units, get the linen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to maintain water temperatures in a manner to ensure residents were provided sufficient and comfortable hot water for use with bathing/personal hygiene. This affected four residents (#32, #42, #56, and #63) of fifteen residents interviewed. Findings included: Interview on 12/18/24 at 2:53 P.M., with Resident #32 and Resident #42 revealed the hot water in their sink was hit and miss especially the last two weeks. The residents reported the water had been so cold staff has had to go to the shower room to obtain hot water to ensure they received warm water to take their bed baths. Interview on 12/18/24 at 3:53 P.M., with Maintenance Director (MD) revealed he had started two weeks ago, and hot water temperatures had been an issue since he started. The MD reported one of the three hot water tanks was not working because it needed a new thermostat control unit. The MD reported he didn't know which hot water tank serviced which part of the building.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hypokalemia, bulbous ureteral stricture hematuria, benign prostatic hyperplasia, retention of urine, diabetes, hyperlipidemias, respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation, osteoarthritis, major depressive disorder, and dementia. Review of weights in Point Click Care for Resident #45 revealed on 07/07/24 he weighed 172.4 and on 10/09/24 he weighed 154.6 for a 10.3 percent weight loss. Review of the nutritional assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 was down seven pounds in one month and 15.4 in three months for a significant weight loss. The weight loss was discussed with the Interdisciplinary Team and the resident was much more active moving around in the hallways in his wheelchair. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 had intact cognition and had lost weight. He was not on a prescribed weight loss regimen. On 12/18/24 at 11:10 A.M. an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, medical record review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident care conferences were completed quarterly. This affected two (Residents #34 and #56) of two residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/25/23 with diagnoses that included pressure ulcer to the sacrum, diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #56's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment revealed an intact and independent cognition level. Further review of the medical record including progress notes revealed care conferences documented as completed on 07/25/24 and 01/23/24. No other notes related to care conferences were noted. Interview with Resident #56 on 12/16/24 at 10:40 A.M. revealed he had not been to any care conferences with the facility. Interview with Social Services Designee (SSD) #119 on 12/17/24 at 11:50 A.M. revealed care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary (recapitulation of stay, final summary of the resident stay, reconciliation of medications, and post-discharge plan of care) was completed upon resident discharge/transfer from the facility. This affected one (Resident #124) of two residents reviewed for discharge. Findings included: Closed record review revealed Resident #124 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 12/12/24 with diagnoses including displaced fracture of upper end of right humerus, hypertension, hyperlipemia, atrial fibrillation, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, bradycardia, hypothyroidism, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, diabetes, kidney failure, difficulty walking, and muscle wasting, falls, lack of coordination, and presence of cardiac pacemaker. Review of Resident #124 medical record revealed no evidence of a discharge summary (recapitulation of stay, final summary of the resident stay,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #73 received timely and appropriate surgical wound care. This affected one (Resident #73) of one resident reviewed for non-pressure skin alterations. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #73 revealed an admission date of 09/19/24 and a discharge date of 11/04/24. Medical diagnoses included osteomyelitis of vertebra, infected surgical site, type two diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy, low back pain, localized swelling, and arthritis due to other bacteria of the left hand. Review of Resident #73's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a surgical dehiscence (the bursting or splitting open of a wound) wound on the lumbar back measuring 24.0 centimeters (cm) by 7.5 cm by 2.0 cm. Review of Resident #73's admission orders (from the hospital) dated 09/19/24 revealed no evidence of wound care order for the surgical incision on the spine,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatments were completed per orders. This affected one (Resident #73) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings included: Closed record review revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteomyelitis of vertebra, opioid use, infected surgical site, type two diabetes, anemia, pressure ulcer to sacral region, mass and lump to left lower limb, and arthritis due to other bacteria left hand. Review of Resident #73's hospital orders dated 09/19/24 revealed to cleanse sacrum wound with mild soap and water, apply Triad hydrophilic paste dime thick to sacrococcygeal area twice daily and as needed. The Triad paste doesn't need to remove completely with cleaning. There was no evidence this order was written on admission to the facility or administered according to the treatment administration record (TAR). Review of admission skin assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure restorative nursing programs were monitored and assessed quarterly. This affected one (Resident #58) of three residents reviewed for mobility. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of Resident #58's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/11/23 with diagnoses including cellulitis to the left lower leg, legal blindness, arthritis, hypertension, and depression. Review of Resident #58's restorative care plan dated 03/25/24 revealed the resident received a passive range of motion (PROM) exercise program to his lower extremities five to seven days per week, for 15 minutes per session. Review of Resident #58's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed to have intact cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of a 15 out of 15. Resident #58 required assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and interview the facility failed to maintain hot water temperatures in a safe manner to prevent potential accident/resident burns. This affected two (Residents #14 and #51) of 13 residents whose water temperatures were obtained. Findings include: On 12/18/24 from 4:34 P.M. to 4:36 P.M. observation of the water temperature in Residents' #14 and #51 room revealed the water temperature was 123.6 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The residents in the rooms were not available for an interview. The Maintenance Director (MD) obtained the water temperature using the facility's digital thermometer in the presence of the surveyor and confirmed the water temperature during observation. Review of the facility undated policy and procedure for water temperatures revealed hot water temperatures meet regulatory requirements in Ohio of 105-120 (F). The policy and procedure did not include a procedure if water temperatures didn't meet regulatory requirements. Interview on 12/18/24 at 5:05 P.M., with the Administrator revealed the facility did not have an action plan for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were adequately assessed and treated for urinary incontinence and failed to ensure residents had adequate indication for use of an indwelling urinary catheter. This affected two (Resident #73 and #57) of three residents reviewed for bladder/bowel and catheters. Findings included: 1. Closed record review revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteomyelitis of vertebra, opioid use, acute subacute infective endocarditis, endocarditis (valve), infected surgical site, type two diabetes, bipolar, anemia, pressure ulcer to sacral region, alcohol dependence, low back pain, localized swelling, mass, and lung to left lower limb, and arthritis due to other bacteria left hand. The resident was discharged on 11/04/24. Review of Resident #73's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was incontinent of bladder and bowel. There was no evidence of a comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a comprehensive and individualized plan to monitor and address significant weight loss. This affected one (Resident #73) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings included: Closed record review revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 11/04/24. The resident's diagnoses included osteomyelitis of vertebra, opioid use, acute subacute infective endocarditis, endocarditis (valve), infected surgical site, type two diabetes, edema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, hypothyroidism, neuropathy, bipolar, anemia, pressure ulcer to sacral region, alcohol dependence, low back pain, localized swelling, mass and lump to left lower limb, and arthritis due to other bacteria left hand. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had congestive heart failure (CHF) and had plus one pitting edema to bilateral lower extremities, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Ombudsman interview, resident interview, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide timely assistance to Resident #56 to obtain state photo identification. This affected one (Resident #56) of one residents reviewed for social services assistance. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/25/23 with diagnoses that included pressure ulcer to the sacrum, diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #56's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment revealed an intact and independent cognition level. Interview with the facility Ombudsman on 12/11/24 at 11:37 A.M. revealed concerns related to the facility not assisting Resident #56 in obtaining a state photo identification in a timely manner in order to gain access to his personal bank account. Interview with Resident #56 on 12/16/24 at 10:46 A.M. revealed he had not obtained a state photo identification in order to gain access to his personal bank account. Interview on 12/18/24 at 11:45 A.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to Resident #73 was free from significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #73) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 11/04/24. Medical diagnoses included osteomyelitis (bone infection) of the vertebra, opioid use, subacute infective endocarditis (infection of the hearts inner lining and/or heart valves), an infected surgical site, type two diabetes mellitus, low back pain, and arthritis due to other bacteria of the left hand. Review of Resident #73's record revealed the resident was hospitalized for a blood transfusion on 09/27/24 and returned on 09/28/24. Resident #73 also had a hospital stay of less than 24 hours on 10/13/24. Review of Resident #73's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a surgical dehiscence (the bursting or splitting open of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview with staff, the facility failed to ensure a pneumonia vaccine was given to Resident #45 after consent. This affected one resident (Resident #45) of five residents reviewed for vaccinations. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hypokalemia, bulbous ureteral stricture hematuria, benign prostatic hyperplasia, retention of urine, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation, osteoarthritis, major depressive disorder, and dementia. Further review of the medical record revealed no evidence Resident #45 was administered the pneumonia vaccine. Review of the Consent for Immunizations of Pneumonia dated 06/28/24 revealed Resident #45 consented to receiving the pneumonia vaccine on 06/28/24. Review of the June 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Resident #45 had not received the pneumonia vaccine. Review of the July…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospice provider self-reported incident review, review of a facility self-reported incident investigation, and staff interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of missing narcotic medications. This affected one (Resident #8) of three residents reviewed for narcotic medication use. The facility census was 73 Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/27/23 with diagnoses that included rheumatoid arthritis, adult failure to thrive and hypertension. Further review of the medical record revealed on 04/19/24 Resident #8 was prescribed the use of morphine sulfate (Roxanol, opioid analgesic medication) 20 milligram (mg) per one milliliter (ml) 0.25 ml every two hours as needed for pain. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a total of 31 doses of medication administered between 04/21/224 and 07/19/24. Thirty-one 0.25 ml doses from a 30 ml bottle would equal 22.25 ml remaining in the 30 ml…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, hospice provider self-reported incident, facility self-reported incident investigation, and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately document medication administration in the medical record and controlled drug administration records. This affected one (Resident #8) of three residents reviewed for narcotic medication use. The facility census was 73 Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/27/23 with diagnoses that included rheumatoid arthritis, adult failure to thrive and hypertension. Further review of the medical record revealed on 04/19/24 Resident #8 was prescribed the use of morphine sulfate (Roxanol, opioid analgesic medication) 20 milligram (mg) per one milliliter (ml) 0.25 ml every two hours as needed for pain. Review of the MAR revealed a total of 31 doses of medication were administered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, self-reported incident review, and staff interview the facility failed to timely report an allegation of sexual abuse and failed to report an allegation of misappropriation to the state survey agency. This affected two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #50) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the Final Decree of Adjudication of Incapacity and Appointment of Plenary Guardian of the Person and Estate document dated January 15, 2003, revealed Resident #1 was adjudged and decreed an incapacitated person and her parents were appointed as guardians. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/04/21 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, adjustment disorder, anxiety, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiologic condition, depression, unspecified lack of coordination, difficulty walking and sleep disorder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Assessment, dated 07/05/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and test tray, the facility failed to serve palatable chicken. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility except two residents (#36, #69) who do not receive nourishment from the kitchen. The facility census was 77 residents. Findings include: Observation of meal service on 07/10/24 at 11:28 A.M. revealed the chicken breast served to Resident #6 appeared dry. Resident #7 revealed he was ordering out because his chicken was dry. Resident #2 said he did not like the meal and was ordering a substitute. Observation of the kitchen on 07/10/24 at 11:42 A.M. revealed the tray line was finishing. The facility ran out of asparagus and provided green beans instead. There were less than a dozen chicken breast remaining. There was no juice in the pan with the chicken and the outside appeared dry. Interview on 07/10/24 at 11:44 A.M. interview with [NAME] #155 revealed he baked the chicken about 30 minutes. On 07/10/24 at 11:46 A.M. a chicken breast was tasted for palatability. The temperature of the chicken breast was 153.4 degrees. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-15 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and invoice review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was administered in a manner to enable it to use its resources effectively to maintain the highest practicable well being of each resident when the facility transport van has not been available for resident use for over one year. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The resident census was 77. Findings include: During the course of the investigation, the surveyor observed and determined the facility did not have transportation available to transport a resident to a doctor appointment. It was discovered the facility did not have a van for transportation or activities. Interview on 07/10/24 at 9:47 A.M. with the Administrator revealed the facility does not have a company van to use for transportation. They have not had a functioning van for about a year. Review of facility provided documentation and invoice revealed the lift in the facility van broke in June 2022. The van was out of service until 04/20/23 when it was repaired. Review of an email dated 07/11/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure sanitary pericare technique and availability of soap in the kitchen at the handwashing sink. This affected one resident (#5) who received personal care from staff and had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility except for two residents (#36, #69) who do not receive nourishment from the kitchen. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Observation on 07/10/24 at 3:15 P.M. of pericare for Resident #5 took place with State Tested Nurse Aides (STNA) #132 and #108. After both STNA's gowned and gloved STNA #132 revealed the facility used periwash spray on a disposable wipe to cleanse the resident wiping from front to back, changing areas on the cloth and then dried with a towel. STNA #108 rolled the resident onto her left side. STNA #132 cleaned the bowel movement with a disposable wipe wet with periwash. After cleaning the bowel movement State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #132 pulled the sheet and blanket up to the residents' chest before changing her gloves. She was wearing the same…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, activity calendar review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents right to self determination when the facility van was not available to transport residents to the bank, appointments and community activities. This affected two residents (#2,#10) of three residents reviewed for banking transportation and one resident (#6) of three residents reviewed for medical appointment transportation. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #6 revealed a [DATE] admission with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, Vitamin D deficiency, muscle weakness, alcoholic polyneuroparthy, iron deficiency anemia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the [DATE] Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment included the resident was independent for daily decision making, and walked with supervision. Review of [DATE], 2:50 P.M. nurse note entered by Registered Nurse (RN) #146 revealed the resident had new appointments for a mammogram on [DATE] at 12:45 P.M. and the Pain Center on [DATE] at 8:48 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-15 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident mail and packages was delivered unopened and on the weekends. This affected three residents (#2, #6 and #7). Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed a 01/16/24 admission with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, Vitamin D deficiency, muscle weakness, alcoholic polyneuroparthy, iron deficiency anemia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the 05/27/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment included the resident was independent for daily decision making, and walked with supervision. Interview on 07/10/24 at 9:01 A.M. with Resident #6 revealed the resident has been attempting to get social security disability to get into an assisted living on a waiver. Two weeks ago Social Services Designee (SSD) #105 brought her mail from the social security office that had been opened with a clean cut like a letter opener. When she asked why it was opened she said sometimes people here try to outrun the system and open mail. Interview on 07/10/24 at 9:40 A.M. with Human Resources #145 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure new interventions were attempted to prevent recurring urinary tract infections. This affected one resident (#5) of three residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. Findings include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed a 09/25/23 admission with diagnoses including chronic congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypertension, hypothyroidism, angina pectoris, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, ischemic cardiomyopathy, transischemic attack and cerebral infarction, depression, dysphasia, obstructive and reflux uropathy, non-rheumatic mitral valve stenosis and altered mental status. Review of a 05/19/24 quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment revealed the resident was independent for daily decision-making, dependent for toileting, personal hygiene and bathing. The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter at the time of the assessment and was frequently incontinent of bowel. The resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-15 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on menu review, dislike list, interviews, and photo, the facility failed to ensure a nourishing, palatable well balanced diet was served. This affected one resident (#6) of three residents reviewed for nourishing diets. Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed a 01/16/24 admission with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, Vitamin D deficiency, muscle weakness, alcoholic polyneuroparthy, iron deficiency anemia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the 05/27/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment included the resident was independent for daily decision making, and walked with supervision. Interview on 07/10/24 at 9:01 A.M. with Resident #6 revealed on 05/27/24 she received a roll and mashed potatoes for supper. The resident had a time stamped photo of her meal tray. On 06/25/24 the resident received plain spaghetti noodles and peaches on her supper tray. Interview on 07/10/24 at 12:11 P.M. with Culinary Director #115 revealed it is possible to get only a few food choices or no entree on a meal tray. Culinary Director #115 indicated the computer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and secured. This affected Resident #24 with the potential to affect all 69 residents residing in the building. Findings included: 1. Observation on 03/29/24 at 7:43 A.M. revealed there was a medication cart left unlocked and unattended. The medication cart was in the main area of the building where residents sit and the area serves as the nursing station for all the nurses and the main desk. Interview on 03/29/24 at 7:44 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #190 confirmed the cart was unlocked and unattended. The LPN reported she was not sure who the nurse was that was responsible for the medication cart, however she would lock the cart. Interview on 03/29/24 at 11:41 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed LPN #190 reported to her that the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended. LPN #127 confirmed with the DON she was the one that had left the medication cart unlocked and unattended. 2. Medical record review revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of administration detail report, interviews, and policy review the facility failed ensure a resident received pain medication as ordered. This affected one (Resident #24) of one reviewed for pain management. Findings included: Medical record review revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility 10/10/19 with diagnoses including diffuse traumatic brain injury, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, quadriplegia, muscle spasm, and opioid abuse in remission. Review of Resident #24's pain observation tool dated 01/12/24 revealed the resident verbalized and/or exhibited non-verbal symptoms of pain. The pain was worse in the morning, afternoon, evening, and night. The pain was sharp and chronic. The resident was able to verbally express their pain level. The resident reported the severity of pain was five out of 10 on the pain scale. The resident receives scheduled Oxycodone. Review of Resident #24's orders dated 03/20/24 revealed Percocet 7.5-325 milligrams (mg) once a day for pain and additional order for four times a day for pain. Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of narcotic control sheet, review of administration detail report, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medication administration was accurately documented. This affected one (Resident #24) of one reviewed for pain management. Findings included: Interview on 03/29/24 at 9:19 A.M., with Resident #24 revealed she had requested her 8:00 A.M. scheduled pain pill at 8:20 A.M. and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #127 did not administer her medication until now. Review of Resident #24's narcotic control sheet for Percocet 7.5-325 milligrams revealed on 03/29/24 the Percocet was administered at 8:00 A.M Review of Resident #24's administration detail report sheet dated 03/29/24 revealed LPN #127 administered Resident #24's Percocet at 8:40 A.M Interview on 03/29/24 at 9:21 A.M. with LPN #127 reported she had administered Resident #24's Percocet at 9:01 A.M LPN #127 confirmed she signed off the Percocet on the narcotic sheet at 8:00 A.M. which did not reflect the actual time she administered it. Review of the facility policy titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview with the staff the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen. This affected all residents but two residents ( Resident #29 and #63) who did not receive food from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 71 residents. Findings include: 1. Observations on 12/28/23 at 10:00 A.M. revealed [NAME] #603 was preparing pureed spinach for lunch with out a hair net on. He verified at 10:02 A.M. he did not have one on. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Staff Attire, revealed all staff members would have their hair off their shoulders, confined in a hair net or cap and facial hair would be restrained. All staff would exhibit appropriate personal hygiene. 2. Observation on 12/28/23 at 10:05 A.M. [NAME] #603 was placing lunch into the steamtable, however, there was dried up scrambled eggs and food debris littering the steam table and preparation area. This was verified by [NAME] #603 at 10:05 A.M. 3. Observations during a tour of the kitchen on 12/28/23 at 10:08 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #604 revealed the back splash behind the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were adequately protected from abusive behavior by other residents. This affected two (Resident #50 and #66) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease, dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. A care plan for activity of daily living (ADL) self care performance deficit initiated 02/13/22 indicated Resident #50 required supervision/set up assistance for ambulation, locomotion and transfers. A care plan initiated 11/02/22 indicated behaviors exhibited by Resident #50 were related to food complaints. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #50 was cognitively intact with no behavioral symptoms. A nursing note dated 11/01/23 at 9:20 P.M. indicated Resident #50 and Resident #74 were arguing in the television lounge. As the nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to initiate a recommended restorative program to promote maintenance of a resident's ambulatory status. This affected one (Resident #26) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed diagnoses including depression, cerebrovascular disease, and occlusion and stenosis of the carotid artery. An admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #26 required assistance with transfers, needed an ambulation device and required limited assistance to walk in her room. A plan of care initiated 05/13/22 indicated Resident #26 had a stroke with one side of her body affected. Interventions included monitoring for decline in activity of daily living status, therapy evaluations and treatments per orders and referring to restorative programs as needed. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #26 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure treatments/interventions were applied according to physician orders. This affected three (Residents #35, #73, and #76) of four residents reviewed for wounds. The facility identified eight residents with non-pressure related skin impairment. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed diagnoses including heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus, dementia, venous insufficiency and history of a diabetic foot ulcer. On 07/31/23 an order was written for Profo boots to be applied while up in the recliner and in the bed. On 10/24/23 an order was written to cleanse the left medial heel with normal saline, apply santyl (debriding agent) and cover with a border dressing every day. A wound report dated 11/14/23 indicated Resident #35 had a full thickness diabetic foot ulcer on the left medial heel which measured 2.5 centimeters (cm) x 3.2 cm x 0.1 cm with moderate drainage. On 11/21/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a wound culture in accordance with orders. This affected one (Resident #75) of four residents reviewed for wounds. The facility identified eight residents with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of Resident #75's medical record revealed diagnoses including rhabdomyolysis (breakdown of skeletal muscle), nicotine dependence, and conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions. A nursing note dated 09/09/23 at 6:00 P.M. indicated Resident #75 had unstageable areas to the mid-scapula and sacral areas. A wound consult note dated 09/29/23 indicated the sacral wound was deteriorating. A note by an Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) on 10/12/23 indicated Resident #75 had multiple foul smelling wounds which she would have cultured. An order was written for a culture of the sacral wound. An APRN note dated 10/19/23 indicated Resident #75 continued to have moderate amount of wound drainage. The note indicated the wound culture did not appear to have been sent. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #13's oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle were changed weekly as ordered and failed to ensure Resident #11's oxygen tubing was changed weekly. This affected two (Resident #13 and #11) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility identified nine residents as receiving oxygen therapy. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, human immunodeficiency virus, asthma, and morbid obesity. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/27/22, revealed Resident #13's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 10, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. There were no behaviors or rejection of care. The resident received oxygen therapy. Review of the Care Plan, dated 01/07/23, revealed Resident #13 was at risk for altered respiratory status with the intervention to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food appropriately stored, prepared and distributed and failed to ensure the environment was clean and sanitary. This had the potential to affect all 53 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility provided a diet list which revealed Residents #5, #40 and #60 did not receive food by mouth and did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 56. Findings included: 1. Observation on 08/01/23 at 10:45 A.M. revealed four containers of possibly fruit salad and four containers of possibly apple crisp not labeled or dated. An interview at the time with the Culinary Director #86 revealed the possibly fruit salad was from 08/01/23 and should have been labeled and dated. He was not sure of the date for the possibly apple crisp but verified it should have been dated and labeled. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage: Cold Foods, revised 04/2018, revealed all foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's infection control logs, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program that adequately tracked infections within the facility to identify trends/ patterns when they occurred. They also failed to ensure indwelling urinary catheter care was completed in accordance with acceptable infection control practices to prevent the possible spread of infection. This affected one (Resident #115) of one residents reviewed for catheter care and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility's census was 56. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's infection control logs for the past seven months (January 2023 through July 2023) revealed the facility's infection preventionist was not consistently identifying and recording the organism involved with infections that was recorded on the monthly logs. The first three months of 2023 (January through March) were reviewed and did not always have an organism identified when the log indicated a diagnostic tests had been completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to insure a clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This affected ten residents (#1, #7, #12, #15, #21, #39, #56, #60, #115 and #265). The census was 56. Findings include: Observation of the facility with the Administrator 08/02/23 at 6:04 P.M. revealed: • The wall paper and door thresholds throughout the halls of the facility were in disrepair. The wall paper was torn off the walls, especially around the doorways of the rooms. The door frames had the paint scratched off. • The halls of the facility did not have fresh air. The halls had an odor of staleness, body odor, dirty clothes and uncleanliness. • Resident #115 is in a low bed with the left side of the bed against the wall. The wall he would be looking at when lying on his left side had drywall damage and needed painted. • Resident #265's bed faced the bathroom door. The door had a great amount of paint damage making it an unsightly focal point. • Resident #12 had two 1.5 foot by six inches gouges in the wall exposing the drywall. There was a four foot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-08 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Level I Pre-admission Screening/Resident Review (PASRR) was completed and did not submit a resident with a mental health disorder or intellectual disability for a Level II review for additional services. This affected two residents (#30 and #56) of two residents reviewed for PASRRs. This had the potential to affect 20 residents with diagnoses of mental health disorder or intellectual disabilities. The facility census was 56. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes, chronic kidney disease, gastro-esophageal reflux disorder, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, unspecified psychosis, schizophrenia, and epilepsy. Review of a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) completed on 07/18/23 revealed Resident #30 had a brief interview for mental status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' complete comprehensive care plans included care plans to address constipation, oxygen use, and anxiety/ psychoactive medication use. This affected four residents (#21, #34, #39, and #56) of 22 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #21's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included schizophrenia, adjustment disorder, anxiety disorder, unspecified psychosis, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, and need for assistance with personal care. A review of Resident #21's physician's orders revealed the resident was ordered to receive Colace (a stool softener) 100 milligrams by mouth every morning for constipation. The order had been in place since 10/04/22. She also had an order to receive Lactulose (a laxative) 20 Grams/ 30 milliliters by mouth twice a day for constipation. That order had been in place since 08/04/21. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide residents with the ability to participate in the development of their comprehensive care plans within 72 hours upon resident admission to the facility and quarterly thereafter. This affected four residents (#7, #30, #48 and #55) of four residents reviewed for care planning. This facility census was 56 residents in the facility. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes, chronic kidney disease, gastro-esophageal reflux disorder, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, unspecified psychosis, schizophrenia, and epilepsy. Review of a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) completed on 07/18/23 revealed Resident #30 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Interview on 07/31/23 at 3:24 P.M. with Resident #30 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with current pressure ulcers and residents at risk for developing pressure ulcers were assessed, turned and repositioned and had treatment ordered for pressure areas. This affected three residents (#12, #40, and #55) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified three residents with pressure ulcers. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed a 09/17/19 admission with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, idiopathic peripheral neuropathy, tracheostomy, quadriplegia, aphasia, cognitive communication deficit, dysphasia, right and left foot drop, anxiety disorder, need for assistance with personal care, and contracture's of right and left hands. The resident had an at risk for impaired skin plan of care initiated 10/06/21 due to immobility, incontinence, tube feed, tracheostomy, and diagnosis of traumatic brain injury. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's infection control logs, infection control surveillance criteria reports, record reviews, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were not used unnecessarily and without an adequate indication for use. This affected five residents (#12, #29, #40, #49, and #215) of seven residents reviewed for antibiotic use. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's infection control log for January 2023 revealed Resident #215 was recorded on the log as having had a facility acquired urinary tract infection (UTI) that was not catheter related. The date of symptom onset was not identified on the log, but the resident was marked as having had dysuria as a symptom. The infection control log indicated laboratory testing was completed. The resident was started on Cephalexin 500 milligrams (mg) every six hours for seven days. The infection control log did not identify what the organism was that caused the UTI that should have been identifiable with laboratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were accurately documented for a resident. This affected one resident (#26) of three residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 56. Findings included: Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Huntington's Disease, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hyperlipidemia and generalized muscle weakness. Further review of her medical diagnosis form revealed she had chosen Do Not Resuscitate - Comfort Care Arrest (DNR-CCA) for her advanced directives. Review of Resident #26's physician order, dated 04/12/23, identified an order for DNR-CCA. Review of Resident #26's plan of care, dated 12/02/21, revealed she was a Do Not Resuscitate - Comfort Care (DNR-CC) advanced directive. Review of Resident #26's State of Ohio Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form, dated 01/22/19, in the binder at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were sufficiently prepared for transfer to a local emergency room. This affected two residents (#35 and #49) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 56. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of unspecified bronchus or lung, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type two diabetes, and generalized muscle weakness. Review of Resident #35's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/15/23, revealed he was cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #35's progress note, dated 06/22/23 and timed 6:37 P.M., revealed he was found on the floor beside of the bed. He stated he had hit his head on the floor and was dizzy. Resident #35's physician was notified, and he was sent out to local hospital. Review of Resident #35's progress notes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Resident's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was updated when a new mental health diagnosis was added. This affected one resident (#56) of six residents reviewed for PASRR and unnecessary medications. The facility census was 56. Findings included: Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia, essential hypertension, chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder (entered 02/28/23), and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition (entered 07/14/23). Review of Resident #56's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/06/23, revealed he was cognitively impaired, had an active diagnosis of depression, and took an antipsychotic medication seven days and an antidepressant medication seven days during the seven day look back period. Review of Resident #56's physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's activity calendar, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided the opportunity to attend activities of her preference to improve her quality of life while residing in the facility. This affected one resident (#17) of four residents reviewed for activities. Findings include: A review of Resident #17's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and difficulty walking. A review of Resident #17's annual activity assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a current interest in card games, religious activities/ bible studies, and group activities. She preferred activities in the afternoons and evenings and her preferred activity setting was the day/ activity room or in her own room. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of facility elopement documentation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired, mobile resident had adequate supervision and did not elope from the facility. This affected one resident (#29) of two residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 56. Findings included: Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease, unspecified disorientation, essential hypertension and unspecified dementia. Review of Resident #29's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/08/23, revealed she was cognitively impaired and needed supervision and set up help only with bed mobility, transferring, walking in room, walking in corridor, locomotion on the unit, and locomotion off the unit. Further review revealed wandering behavior was not exhibited during the seven day look back period. Review of Resident #29's Wandering Observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure confirmation of PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube placement prior to the administration of medications. This affected one resident (#40) of one resident observed for medication administration through a PEG tube. The facility census was 56. Findings included: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed an initial admission of 09/01/19 and a readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, quadriplegia, essential hypertension, personal history of traumatic brain injury, and gastrostomy status. Review of Resident #40's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/06/23, revealed he was rarely/never understood, had a short-term and long-term memory problem, his ability to make decisions regarding tasks of daily living was severely impaired, and he had a feeding tube. Review of Resident #40's physician order, dated 07/24/23, identified he was to receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a tracheostomy tube had all the necessary tracheostomy equipment/ supplies needed for emergencies as ordered by the physician and as per the plan of care. This affected one resident (#34) of two residents reviewed with tracheostomies. Findings include: A review of Resident #34's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute on chronic respiratory failure, and tracheostomy status. A review of Resident #34's physician's orders revealed he had an order to receive humidified oxygen at 5 liters per minute (LPM) via trach mask. He also had an order to be suctioned every shift and as needed (prn). His orders included the need to maintain an Ambu bag (resuscitative device that could be attached to the tracheostomy to administer rescue breathing in the event of a respiratory arrest) oxygen (e.g. an E-cylinder), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide medically related social services to ensure a resident maintained highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. This affected one resident (#55) of one resident reviewed for mood status. This had the potential to affect 34 residents with a Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) score of 10 or higher. The facility census was 56. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #55 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia, fracture of lower end of right femur, hypertension, and depression. Review of a comprehensive admission minimum data set (MDS) completed on 01/03/23 revealed Resident #55 had a PHQ-9 score of 6, indicating mild depression. Review of a quarterly MDS completed on 03/22/23 revealed Resident #55 had a PHQ-9 score of 13, indicating moderate depression. A quarterly MDS completed on 04/18/23 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications ordered on an as needed (prn) basis for hypertension and pain included appropriate parameters to direct the nurse on when to administer the medications. This affected one resident (#34) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: A review of Resident #34's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure) and amputations of his bilateral legs above the knee, and adult inset diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy. A review of Resident #34's physician's orders revealed he had orders in place to receive Clonidine HCL 0.1 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 12 hours as needed for hypertension. The order had been in place since 06/16/23 and did not include any parameters from the physician to direct the nurse on when to administer it. There was no order to administer if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were used for an appropriate indication and administered as ordered. This affected two residents (#31 and #56) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 56. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia, essential hypertension, chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition (added 07/14/23). Review of Resident #56's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/06/23, revealed he was cognitively impaired, had an active diagnosis of depression, and took an antipsychotic medication seven days and an antidepressant medication seven days during the seven day look back period. a. Review of Resident #56's physician order, dated 03/01/23, revealed he was to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure they were free from a medication error rate of 5% or more. This affected one resident (#40) of four residents observed for medication administration. This resulted in three errors in medication administration out of 27 opportunities for error resulting in a medication error rate of 11.11%. The facility census was 56. Findings included: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed an initial admission of 09/01/19 and a readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, quadriplegia, essential hypertension, personal history of traumatic brain injury, and gastrostomy status. Review of Resident #40's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/06/23, revealed he was rarely/never understood, had a short-term and long-term memory problem, his ability to make decisions regarding tasks of daily living was severely impaired, and he had a feeding tube. Review of Resident #40's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-06-02 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Resident Council minutes, policy review, staff interview, and resident interview the facility failed to ensure Resident Council concerns were addressed in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The facility census was 62. Findings Include: Review of the Resident Council minutes from 02/25 to 05/25 revealed concerns identified during the Resident Council meeting. Call light wait time concerns were mentioned during the 02/25/25, 03/20/25, and 04/17/25 Resident Council meeting. Ice water concerns were mentioned during the 04/17/25 meeting. Review of the section titled Old Business in the Resident Council minutes revealed there was no mention of any resolution related to call light wait times or ice water concerns. Review of the undated Resident Council policy indicated that any concerns that are voiced at the meeting should be documented in a concern form, distributed to the appropriate dept head, and the facility should follow the Resident Grievance Procedure for any concerns identified. Interview on 05/19/25 at 3:36…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$250,817 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $54,945 — penalty dated 2026-04-21
  • $96,753 — penalty dated 2025-06-02
  • $84,686 — penalty dated 2025-03-20
  • $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-08-22
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-05-16 for 2 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-25 for 54 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.2-2.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH 3 of 5Charleston Healthcare CenterCharleston, WV

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SXCY MSTR LSCO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2022
HEALTH CARE LEASE FACILITIES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2018
SXCY HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2022
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
STOLTZ, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2018
WILHEIM, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2018
REICHART MGT CO., LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
GROVES, DONNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
MURTY, RAMANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2018
ODENTHAL, RICHARDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
C.R. STOLTZ FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
C.R. STOLTZ IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
I. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
R.S. WILHEIM IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
RONALD S WILHEIM 2012 SPOUSAL TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
RRW, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
S.L. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
SKILLED HC HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
WILHEIM FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 9%Other / private 23%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$268per resident / day
operating cost
$8,138per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$290per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365629. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next