No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Greenbrier Health Center

6455 Pearl Rd, Parma Heights, OH 44130 · For profit - Corporation · 162 certified beds · (440) 888-5900 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0606) — cited Oct 2025Resident-funds citation (F0569)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$26,685 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Oct 2025
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $26,685 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-08)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
6325 York Road, Suite 102
Pharmacy
6300 Pearl Rd · (440) 886-0775 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6444 Pearl Rd · (440) 925-0002 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Pearl Road · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
6480 Pearl Rd · (440) 886-3500

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.0%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%0.4%2.0%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms39.7%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.4%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.7%25.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.9%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%3.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.6%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.8%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine37.5%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.5%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.0%12.9%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.6%CMS range 42.9–67.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.9–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.9–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
0.91
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.82
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.21
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
50.8%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 162 beds and averages 118.6 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.32 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

23
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-10-08)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2023-10-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of a police report, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent Resident #117, a cognitively impaired resident with a history of elopement from eloping. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for Actual Harm on 09/14/25 at approximately 10:30 P.M. when Resident #117 exited the facility without staff knowledge and was found by local police (on 09/15/25 at approximately 12:10 A.M.) in the middle of a residential street of a neighborhood approximately 1.7 miles from the facility. When found, Resident #117 was confused and speaking in his native language (Russian), asking to go to a local ethnic meat market. The resident was subsequently transported to the local hospital via emergency medical services (EMS) for evaluation.In addition, concerns that did not rise to Immediate Jeopardy occurred when the facility failed to maintain a safe environment related to smoking and failed to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to collaborate care between nursing and physician services to identify and assess risk factors affecting quality of care and wellbeing of Resident #129 and placing Resident #129 at risk for the development of a blood clot and rehospitalization within 30 days of admission. Actual harm occurred on 09/01/23 when Resident #129, who had a history of embolism (blood clot), was at high risk for developing blood clots and was non-ambulatory, insisted on being sent to the hospital because the facility was not doing anything to address his complaints of severe pain in his left leg which was being treated at the facility as neuropathic pain. Resident #129 was ordered the anti-coagulant medication - Heparin from admission through 08/23/23. The facility failed to adequately assess the continued need for Heparin or any other type of anti-coagulant medication after 08/23/23. After being transported to the hospital on [DATE], the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-08 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespread
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, interview, facility policy review and review of the Ohio Revised Code (ORC), the facility failed to hire staff free of disqualifying offenses. This affected three out of 12 personnel files reviewed for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #639, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #660 and Supply Coordinator (SC)/CNA #604 and had the potential to affect all 123 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:Review of CNA #660's personnel file revealed a date of hire of 01/25/22. Review of CNA #660's background check dated 12/27/22 revealed a conviction of theft 2913.02 from March 2004. No personal character standards were located in the personnel file or background check envelope. Review of SC/CNA #604's personnel file revealed a date of hire of 06/08/22. Review of SC/CNA #604's background check dated 01/08/25 revealed a conviction of unauthorized use of property 2913.04 from April 2022. No personal character care standards were located in the personnel file or background check envelope. Review of LPN #639's personnel file revealed a date of hire of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy revealed the facility failed to ensure stored medications for residents use were not expired and were kept at an appropriate temperature for use and failed to ensure Resident #61 medications were not left at bedside unsecured without confirmation of administration. This affected one resident (Resident #61) and had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 123. Findings include:1. Observation and interview on 09/23/25 at 12:05 P.M. of the medication storage room with Unit Manager (UM) #629 revealed expired stock medications located in the storage room. UM #629 revealed the stocked medications were for the use of all residents residing at the facility who may have or may acquire an order for the medications. UM #629 confirmed the following medications were expired:-One bottle of Tylenol 650 milligrams (mg) 200 tabs with an expiration date of 07/2025.-Four bottles enteric coated Aspirin 325…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to serve hot and palatable foods. This affected seven residents (Resident #3, #27, #52, #54, #69, #99 and #128) and had the potential to affect 120 of 123 residents receiving meals from the facility. The facility indicated three residents (Resident # 17, #23, and #67) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 123.1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed and admission date of 08/12/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to acute embolism and thrombosis of right femoral vein, type II diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, and mild-protein calorie malnutrition. Resident #3 was noted to be cognitively intact, received a therapeutic diet and required set up for meals. Interview on 09/22/25 at 12:05 P.M. with Resident #3 revealed they get the same cold and overcooked foods. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 11/06/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to orthopedic aftercare for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-08 · tag F0813 — widespread
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate monitoring and safe storage of outside food within unit and resident room refrigerators. This had the potential to affect 120 of 123 residents residing at the facility. The facility indicated that five residents (Residents #29, #33, #49, #94, and #100) had room refrigerators and indicated three residents (Residents #17, #23, and #67) received no food by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 123. Observation on 09/24/25 at 2:50 P.M. with Registered Dietitian (RD) #738 of the facility unit refrigerator for Unit AR U1 revealed an undated dietary plate with Resident #99's name on a loose paper towel over it, three undated Styrofoam meal containers of restaurant food were found with Resident #88's name on it and a tray of six undated kitchen provided sandwiches on a undated tray on the bottom shelf of the refrigerator.Observation on 09/24/25 at 2:55 P.M. with RD #738 of ARU2 unit refrigerator revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility was maintained a clean and sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect all 123 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:An environmental tour was conducted on 09/29/25 between 8:00 A.M. and 8:45 A.M. The following concerns were observed and verified by Housekeeping Director #999 at the time of discovery:The handrails in the hallways throughout the facility were noticeably chipped, scuffed, and rough to the touch.The light fixtures in the hallways throughout the facility contained noticeable areas of dust, dirt, and dead insects inside the fixtures.Resident #52's light fixture above the bed was missing a light bulb.The rooms of Residents #27, #32, #52, #84, and #139 had multiple water-stained ceiling tiles.The privacy curtains in the rooms of Residents #76, #85, and #104 were noticeably stained.The walls in the rooms of Residents #12, #14, #82, and #107 were severely scuffed.The wall-unit air conditioners in the rooms of Residents #114 and #127 displayed a clean filter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-08 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide routine notice when the resident account balance reached and/or exceeded the resource limit. This affected four residents (#26, #46, #52 and #106) of five residents reviewed for resident funds. Facility census was 123.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/12/19 and diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, type two diabetes, vitamin D deficiency and anxiety. Review of Resident #26's provided financial records revealed balances of $29.860.02 on 04/30/25, $31,005.30 on 05/30/25 and $32,237.87 on 06/30/25. One spend-down letter was provided on 04/09/25. Interview on 09/23/25 at 3:39 P.M. with Business Office Manager (BOM) #633 verified Resident #26 was only provided a spend-down letter in April 2025 but not in May or June 2025. BOM #633 confirmed Resident #26 was above the resource limit in May and June 2025 and was not provided a spend-down letter as required. 2. Review of Resident #46's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) received showers as required. This finding affected 11 (Residents #8, #11, #27, #52, #58, #61, #69, #99, #110, #119, and #135) of 15 residents reviewed for showers. Facility census was 123.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dependence on renal dialysis, major depressive disorder and hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #8's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition and required substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bathing. Review of Resident #8's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Plan revealed an intervention dated 04/11/24 and revised 08/22/25 which stated the resident required substantial/maximal assistance for shower/bathing. Review of Resident #8's shower schedule revealed the resident was scheduled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive wound management system was in place to prevent and treat Resident #27 and #80's wounds and failed to ensure Resident #128's nephrostomy bandage was changed as ordered and Resident #136's intravenous (IV) dressings were completed as ordered. This finding affected four (Residents #27, #80, #128 and #136) of four residents reviewed for quality of wound care.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including encounter for orthopedic aftercare following a surgical amputation, vascular dementia and diabetes. Review of Resident #27's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #27's progress note dated 09/17/25 at 6:01 P.M. revealed the resident was observed by the nurse attempting to self-transfer from the bed to the wheelchair. The resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to meet resident needs. This affected 91 residents residing on the second floor (Residents #7, #8, #9, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #34, #35, #36, #37, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #48, #51, #52, #54, #55, #56, #58, #59, #60, #62, #64, #66, #68, #69, #70, #71, #74, #76, #77, #78, #79, #80, #82, #83, #85, #86, #87, #89, #90, #92, #95, #96, #97, #100, #101, #102, #104, #105, #106, #107, #110, #111, #112, #113, #114, #115, #116, #117, #118, #119, #121, #124, #125, #127 and #138). Facility census was 123.Findings include:Review of the facility assessment, updated 07/10/25, revealed for an average census of 122 residents, based on the facility's resident population and their needs for care and support, our approach to staffing is to ensure each of our facility residents has the minimum care staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-08 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #8, #69, #71 and #119 were provided with dental services as required. This finding affected four (Residents #8, #69, #71 and #119) of four residents reviewed for dental services. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #71's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #71's care plans did not reveal evidence of a dental care plan with interventions for dental care of the resident. Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed the payor source was Medicaid. Observation on 09/22/25 at 12:50 P.M. revealed Resident #71 had a partially cracked or decayed tooth on the upper right side of her mouth. Attempted interview with the resident and she was not interviewable.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy revealed the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained while assessing Resident #40, #87, #104 and #138 using a shared glucometer and failed to adhere to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) while providing catheter care to Residents #35 and #38. This affected six residents (Resident #40, #87, #104, #138, #35 and #38) of eight residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 123. Findings include:1. Record review for Resident #104 revealed an admission date of 08/06/24. Diagnosis included diabetes mellitus (DM) with diabetic peripheral angiopathy without gangrene.Review of the Significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #104 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the Care Plan dated 05/09/23 revealed Resident #104 had DM with interventions to obtain blood sugars per order. Review of the physician order for Resident #104 dated 06/19/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were updated in the medical record to reflect resident's current wishes. This affected one resident (Resident #10) of 60 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to Ogilvie syndrome, atrial fibrillation, type II diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity and schizophrenia.Review of the [DATE] discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 for Resident #10 revealed intact cognition.Review of the [DATE] uploaded code status form under the miscellaneous tab of the electronic medical record revealed a [DATE] signed document for Resident #10 for an advance directive of Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest.Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed under the blue banner bar revealed a code status to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the resident/responsible party received the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) timely and as required. This affected one resident (#123) of three residents reviewed for liability notices. The facility census was 123. Findings include:Record review for Resident #123 revealed an admission date of 05/12/25. Diagnosis included cerebral palsy, morbid severe obesity, muscle weakness, and need for assistants with personal care. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #123 revealed Resident #123 was cognitively intact. Resident #123 had no impairment to the upper or lower extremities, required supervision or touch assistants with eating, dependent for toileting, personal hygiene, substantial/max assist bed mobility and dependent for chair/bed to chair transfers. Review of the physician orders for Resident #123 dated 06/11/25 revealed PT eval completed this date. Recommend PT services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to develop individualized plans of care. This affected three residents (#67, #71 and #117) out of 44 resident records reviewed. Facility census was 123.Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #67's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/17/23 and diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, epilepsy, hypertension, bipolar disorder, quadriplegia and contractures to bilateral hands, knees and hips. Review of Resident #67's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #67 had a memory problem with severe cognitive impairment. Resident #67 had highly impaired vision, adequate hearing and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the sexual offender log for August and September 2025 revealed a referral date of 03/17/25 for Resident #67. The national and state sex offender registries indicated Resident #67 was a sex offender with a readmission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise a resident's care plan to reflect a residents current needs. This affected two of (Resident #69 and #117) of forty four sampled Residents. The facility census was 123.Findings include: 1. Resident #117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinsonism, Steele-[NAME]-[NAME] syndrome (an extremely rare brain disease that gradually impairs balance, eye movement, speech, and swallowing), and dementia. Review of Resident #117's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #117 was moderately cognitively impaired, utilized a walker for ambulation, and required setup assistance for completing activities of daily living. The assessment also documented that Resident #117 engaged in wandering behaviors every one to three days and identified his primary language as Russian. Review of Resident #117's care plan problem dated 07/19/25 revealed Resident #117 was considered an elopement risk related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #38's pressure ulcer wound care dressings were completed as ordered. This finding affected one (Resident #38) of seven residents reviewed for pressure wounds. Findings include:Findings include:Review of Resident 38's medical record revealed the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia, diabetes and schizophrenia.Review of Resident #38's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition.Review of Resident #38's physician orders revealed an order dated 09/17/25 to cleanse the mid-spine, right back, sacrum, right ischium, left buttock, right lateral leg and left lower extremity with wound cleanser, apply collagen sheet to the base of the wound and secure with a bordered foam dressing daily and as needed.Review of Resident #38's wound progress note dated 09/24/25 at 3:39 P.M. revealed the resident had a mid-spine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident #119 with timely incontinence care. This finding affected one (Resident #119) of eleven residents reviewed for incontinence care. Findings include:Review of Resident #119's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes.Review of Resident #119's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder and required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene.Review of Resident #119's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Self-Performance Care Plan revealed an intervention dated 05/09/25 which indicated the resident required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene.Observation on 09/22/25 at 9:45 A.M. of Certified Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident #67's enteral feeding was labeled and dated as required. This affected one resident (Resident #67) of four residents requiring enteral feedings at the facility. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 09/09/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, use of gastrostomy, traumatic subdural hemorrhage, epilepsy, contracture of right and left hand, right knee, left knee, right hip, bipolar disorder, tracheostomy, and quadriplegia.Review of the 09/06/25 discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 for Resident #67 revealed severe cognitive impairment and dependence upon staff for all activities of daily living.Review of the physician order dated 09/10/25 for Resident #67 revealed he received nothing by mouth.Review of the 06/03/25 physician order for Resident #67 revealed an order for enteral nutrition via pump of Jevity 1.5 calorie formula at 50 milliliters (mL) per hour for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain tracheostomy care and ensure clean suctioning equipment and trach replacement supplies were available for Resident #14. This affected one resident (Resident #14) of one resident reviewed for trach care. Findings include: Record review for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 11/09/23. Diagnosis included cranial cerebrospinal fluid leak, tracheostomy, dysphagia, other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, and need for assistants with personal care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #14 had impairment on one side of the upper extremities and required assistants with activities of daily living (ADL). Resident #14 did not receive oxygen therapy, received suctioning, and trach care. Review of the Care Plan revised 08/08/24 revealed Resident #14 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #8 was monitored prior to and following dialysis treatments. This affected one (Resident #8) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 07/20/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to type II diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, stage five chronic kidney disease, and dependence on renal dialysis.Review of the 08/10/25 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 for Resident #8 revealed intact cognition, required supervision for dressing and personal hygiene and was noted to receive dialysis.Review of the physician order dated 07/30/24 for Resident #8 revealed an order to send medication list, face sheet and dialysis assessment with resident on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Night shift to prepare paperwork every night shift on Tuesday, Thursday and Sunday. Review of the physician order dated 03/31/25 for Resident #8 revealed an order for Dialysis every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation of medication administration, interview, record review, and review of the instructions for insulin pen-injections, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered resulting in a medication errors rate of 6.7 percent (%). This affected two residents (Resident #87 and #138) out of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 123.Findings include:1. Record review for Resident #138 revealed an admission date of 05/20/25. Diagnosis included diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #138 was cognitively intact. Resident #138 received insulin injections daily. Review of the Care Plan dated 06/02/25 revealed Resident #138 had diabetes with diabetic neurological complications. Interventions included to administer insulin injections per medical providers orders.Review of the physician orders for Resident #138 dated 08/28/25 revealed orders for Insulin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #133 and Resident #136 was free from significant medications error. This affected two residents (Resident #133 and #136) of three residents reviewed for medication errors. The facility census was 123.Findings include: 1.Record review for Resident #133 revealed an admission date of 01/14/25 and a discharge date of 03/26/25. Diagnosis included Crohn's disease, muscle weakness, abdominal pain, and other chronic pain. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #133 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #133 received scheduled and as needed pain medications. Pain frequency was almost constantly and frequently had an effect on sleep. Review of the care plan dated 02/02/25 revealed Resident #133 has complaints of acute/chronic pain or at risk for pain related to Crohn's disease, intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbosacral region, abdominal pain, vitreous degeneration,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to administer pain relieving medications as ordered. This affected one (Resident #8) of three residents reviewed who received pain medications. The census was 120. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 01/14/25. Diagnoses included Crohn's disease of large intestine with fistula, intervertebral disc degeneration, and chronic pain. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/21/25, revealed Resident #8 had intact cognition and chronic pain. Review of the plan of care dated 02/02/25 revealed Resident #8 had complaint of acute/chronic pain related to Crohn's disease, intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbosacral region, abdominal pain, and other chronic pain. Interventions included attempting non-pharmacological interventions, complete pain assessments, follow physician orders, and observe for pain every shift. Interview on 03/07/25 at 10:38 A.M. with the Administrator revealed on 02/25/25 Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure effective discharge planning was in place for two residents (Residents #125 and #126) of three residents reviewed for discharge planning. The facility census was 123. Findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #125 revealed an admission date of 04/30/24 and a discharge date of 12/04/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, spondylosis, psychoactive substance abuse, and vascular dementia. Review of Resident #125's care plan revealed it was last reviewed on 04/2024 and stated the resident had no plans for discharge to the community. Review of Resident #125's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated intact cognition. Review of activities of daily living (ADLs) revealed Resident #125 used a walker and required supervision for ADLs. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based of observation, interview, record review,Self-Reported Incident (SRI) , and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure all staff followed Mechanical lift protocol. This affected one (Resident #135) of three residents reviewed for safe transfer with Mechanical lift. This had the potential to affect 33 residents that required the use of a mechanical lift for transfers (Resident #1, #3, #9, #10, #18, #27, #37, #38, #39, #44, #48, #49, #51, #54, #56, #57, #64, #68, #70, #71, #78, #81, #85, #88, #89, #94, #110, #114, #115, #122, #123 and #135). The facility census was 122. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #135 revealed an admission date of 02/01/24 and discharged on 08/22/24. Diagnoses included diabetes, chronic kidney disease, morbid obesity, spinal stenosis and osteoarthritis. Resident #135 had intact cognition. Resident #135 was dependent on transfers and used a mechanical lift (Hoyer) for transfers. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care. This affected four (#102, #115, #117, and #120) of six residents observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 128. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #102's medical records revealed an admission date of 12/05/23. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, muscle weakness and need for personal care assistance. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #102 had impaired cognition, was dependent with toileting, and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #102's care plan dated 06/10/24 revealed Resident #102 was totally dependent for toileting. Resident #102 was incontinent of bowel and bladder and interventions included to check Resident #102 for incontinence. Interviews on 07/31/24 at 5:15 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #213 and STNA #239 revealed they were aware of residents who did not receive timely incontinence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of a local police report, the facility failed to ensure resident requests were honored and residents were treated with respect and dignity at all times. This affected one (#120) of 10 sampled residents and two residents who participated in random interviews (#108 and #8). The facility census was 128. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #120's medical records revealed an admission date of 02/01/24. Diagnoses included morbid obesity, need for personal care assistance, muscle weakness and difficulty walking. Review of Resident #120's care plan dated 02/01/24 revealed Resident #120 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) by one staff who performed all the care and was totally dependent for transfers. Resident #120 preferred to get up into her wheelchair between breakfast and lunch and preferred to lay down before dinner daily. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #120 had intact cognition and was dependent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment. This affected two (#67 and #117) of five random residents whose rooms were observed. The facility census was 128. Findings include: Observation on 07/31/24 at 8:05 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #230 and STNA #293 revealed two soiled incontinence briefs on Resident #117's wheelchair with gnats flying around them. Interview with STNA #230 at time of observation revealed when she entered Resident #117's room the incontinence briefs were on the floor and she had picked them up and placed them on Resident #117's wheelchair. Observation on 07/31/24 at 9:09 A.M. revealed a large pile of dirty linens on the floor of Resident #67's room with a foul odor detected. Interview with Resident #67 at time of observation revealed the dirty linens had been on the floor since last night when they changed his bed. The observation was confirmed by STNA #330 who indicated she would dispose of the linens. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #135 received appropriate discharge instructions. This finding affected one resident (#135) of three residents reviewed for discharge instructions. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #135 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 03/29/24 with diagnoses including diabetes, essential hypertension, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #135's Report and Decision of the Hearing Officer form dated 02/22/24 revealed the resident won the appeal, and the facility may not discharge and transfer the resident based on non-payment. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #135 exhibited intact cognition. Review of the Notice of Discharge and Transfer form dated 02/28/24 revealed Resident #135 was being discharged for an unpaid balance of $11,520.00. The resident did not appeal the second notice. Review of the progress note dated 03/19/24 at 10:22 A.M. indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and menu review, the facility failed to serve hot, palatable, and visibly pleasing foods. This affected Residents #17, #19, #20, #28, #34, #108, and had the potential to affect all residents, except Residents #23, #25, #63, #100, and #115 who were identified as not consuming food by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 131. Findings include: Interview with Resident #28 on 02/14/24 at 6:18 A.M. revealed the facility's food had no flavor and he wouldn't feed it to a dog. Interview with Resident #19 on 02/15/24 at 7:40 A.M. revealed the facility's food was terrible. Interview with Resident #17 on 02/15/24 at 7:57 A.M. revealed the facility's food was cold and not hot enough. Observation on 02/15/24 at 10:00 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #948 revealed she was using the first floor unit microwave behind the nursing station adjacent to Resident #17's room. Interview with STNA #948, at the time of the observation, revealed Resident #20's food was cold and Resident #20 requested that it to be warmed up. Review of the facility menu for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff wore hair coverning when in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all residents, except Residents #23, #25, #63, #100, and #115 who were identified as not consuming food by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 131. Findings include: Observation and interview on 02/15/24 at 1:00 P.M. revealed Kitchen Aide (KA) #814 entering the kitchen from the door located near the first floor dining room and walking from one side of the kitchen to the opposite side entrance, near the front entrance of the facility, without a hairnet in place. Interview with KA #814 revealed she went to get something to drink and did not want to walk all the way around to reenter the kitchen. Interview on 02/21/24 at 9:40 A.M. with Corporate Dietary Manager (CDM) #959 revealed there were no hairnets for kitchen staff use located at the entry to the kitchen from the first floor dining room. Review of the facility provided list revealed Residents #23, #25, #63, #100, and #115 were identified as not consuming food by mouth (NPO).

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of personnel file, the facility failed to ensure staff who clocked in for work with symptoms of Covid-19 were immediately tested and or sent home. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility also failed to ensure urinary catheter drainage bags were not placed on the floor. This affected one (#85) of two residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility census was 131. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #85's medical records revealed an admission date of 12/15/23. Diagnoses included stroke with left sided weakness, and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #85 had impaired cognition, had an indwelling urinary catheter and was incontinent of bowel. Review of the care plan dated 12/22/23 revealed Resident #85 had an indwelling urinary catheter related to obstructive uropathy (disorder of the urinary tract that occurs due to obstructed urinary flow). Interventions included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, staff personnel files, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity. This affected six residents who were interviewed, whose records were reviewed, or were observed during random observations (#9, #11, #71, #109, #112, and #115) and had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 131. Findings include: 1. Interview on 02/14/24 at 5:37 A.M. with Resident #115 revealed sometimes the nurses were rude to him while giving him medications. Interview on 02/14/24 at 7:28 A.M. with Resident #71 revealed he was able to provide most of his own care but there were staff who had been rude. Interview on 02/15/24 at 10:45 A.M. with Resident #112 revealed sometimes state tested nurse aides were rude to him and did not treat him with respect and dignity. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 11/20/23 with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This affected seven (#17, #89, #90, #110, #111, #112, #113, and #115) residents and had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 131. Findings include: Observation on 02/14/24 at 5:24 A.M. revealed a food cart with multiple dirty dinner dishes located on the second floor. Interview on 02/14/24 at 5:31 A.M. with State Tested Nurse Assistant (STNA) #941 confirmed the dirty dishes in the hall and stated she was not aware of who was supposed to take them down to the kitchen. STNA #941 believed the dishes should have been taken down to the kitchen on the previous shift because dinner was done by the time she arrived for her shift. Observation of Resident #115's room on 02/14/24 at 5:37 A.M. revealed the wall underneath the air conditioning (AC) unit had a large amount of chipped paint. Interview with STNA #941 at the time of the observation confirmed the chipped paint. Observation of Resident #17's room on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing monitoring and timely intervention for residents with symptoms of urinary tract infections and failed to provide timely and appropriate incontinence care and toileting assistance. This affected one (#115) of two residents reviewed for urinary catheters, and four (#15, #17, #117 and #136) of four residents reviewed for incontinence. The facility census was 131. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #115's medical records revealed an admission date of 09/16/22. Diagnoses included obstructive uropathy (a disorder of the urinary tract that occurs due to obstructed urinary flow). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #115 had intact cognition, had a urinary catheter and was incontinent of bowel. Review of the care plan dated 01/16/24 revealed Resident #115 had a urinary catheter. Interventions included report signs and symptoms that included foul smelling urine to the physician. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-26 · tag F0810 — pattern
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure assistive devices were in place for meals. This affected three (#97, #125 and #126) of three residents reviewed for assistive devices during meals. The facility census was 131. Findings include: Observation of the lunch meal tray line on 02/15/24 at 1:17 P.M. with Kitchen [NAME] (KC) #957 revealed the meal tickets of three residents (#97, #125, and #126) were set to the side. The meal tickets indicated the assistive devices each resident required with meals. Continued observation revealed KC #957 looking throughout the kitchen for the required assistive devices. Interview with KC #957, at the time of the observation, revealed Residents #97 and #126 required a scoop plate and Resident #125 required a divided plate and they had already used the assistive plates that were available, there were no more assistive plates. Observation and interview on 02/15/24 at 1:23 P.M. with the Administrator, who was assisting with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure reasonable requests made by a resident's guardian were honored. This affected one (#1) of one resident reviewed for reasonable requests made by a guardian. The facility census was 131. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 11/27/23 with diagnoses that included quadriplegia, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy status, traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration and contractures of the left and right hip and left and right knee. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 was severely impaired for task of daily life and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the care plan dated 01/31/24 revealed Resident #1 required assistance with ADLs related to quadriplegia and a traumatic brain injury. Review of the progress note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and personnel file review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to accepted standards of practice. This affected one resident (#10) identified during a random observation. The facility also failed to ensure pain medications were administered as ordered by the physician and requested by the resident. This affected two of 14 sampled residents (#21 and #22). The facility census was 131. Findings include: 1. Observation on 02/14/24 at 9:09 A.M. revealed Unit Manger/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #848 at a medication cart preparing medications for administration. LPN #848 was observed popping pills out of medication cards into a medication cup. LPN #848 handed the medication cup to Registered Nurse (RN) #828, who took the medications into Resident #10's room. Interview with LPN #848 at time observation revealed she was helping RN #828 with her medication pass. Interview on 02/14/24 at 10:31 A.M. with RN #828 revealed she administered the medications given to her by LPN #848 to Resident #10. RN #828 explained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to appropriately care for a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube site to identify, lessen or resolve possible skin irritation and local infection. This affected one (#115) of two residents reviewed for PEG tubes. The facility census was 131. Findings include: Review of Resident #115's medical records revealed an admission date of 09/16/22. Diagnoses included gastrostomy (artificial opening in the abdomen for nutrition). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #115 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the care plan dated 01/1/6/24 revealed Resident #1 had a PEG tube. Interventions included provide insertion site care per orders. Observation of Resident #115 on 02/14/24 at 5:37 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #941 revealed Resident #115 had a PEG tube. Observation of the PEG tube insertion site…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate respiratory care equipment was at the resident's bedside for immediate access. This affected two (#1 and #17) of two residents reviewed for tracheostomy care. The facility census was 131. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #17's medical records revealed an admission date of 11/09/23. Diagnoses include tracheostomy and dysphasia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 had impaired cognition. Review of the care plan dated 01/31/24 revealed Resident #17 had a tracheostomy. Interventions included keep an extra trach at the bedside and provide suctioning per orders. Review of current physician orders for February 2024 revealed to suction resident every shift and as needed. Observation on 02/14/24 at 8:38 A.M. revealed Resident #17 was exhibiting signs of inability to clear his airway. At the time of observation Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #866 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended in resident rooms. This affected one (#72) of three residents whose rooms were randomly observed for unsecured medications. The facility census was 131. Findings include: Observation on 02/14/24 at 7:28 A.M. revealed Resident #72 was sleeping in bed, with a cup of medications on his bedside table that contained three pills. Observation of the medication cup in Resident #72's room on 02/14/24 at 7:31 A.M. with Unit Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #804 confirmed there were three pills in the medication cup. LPN #804 identified two of the pills being Resident #71's thyroid medication but was unable to identify the third pill. LPN #804 stated she had educated the nursing staff on not leaving medications at the residents' bedside previously. Review of facility's undated policy titled Medication Administration revealed medications should not be left unattended. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00151242.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident record review, printed meal ticket review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in the correct form to meet resident needs. This affected one (#17) of one resident reviewed for appropriate diet texture. The facility census was 131. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 11/09/23 with diagnoses that included fracture of right femur, tracheostomy status, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) oropharyngeal stage. Review of the Diet History Food Preferences assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 had issues with swallowing and was on a pureed diet. Review of the physician orders dated 11/20/23 revealed Resident #17 had a current order for a regular diet, dysphagia pureed texture with nectar thick liquids consistency for nutrition. Review of the Dietary Nutritional assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 was on a pureed diet with a history of chewing and swallowing issues.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary and comfortable interior living environment. This affected seven residents (Resident #4, #16, #31, #38, #39, #78, and #103.) of the 125 residents living in the facility. Finding Include: 1. Observation on 10/17/23 at 8:15 A.M. of Resident #4's room revealed the heater unit on the floor had busted parts, was rusted and covered in dust. Three of three walls in the room were dirty with pealing paint and dried on staining from the ceiling to the floor. Interview with Resident #4 at the time of observation revealed she wished they would do something about the heater and dirty walls. 2. Observation on 10/16/23 at 5:03 P.M. of Resident #16's room revealed the bathroom door had four holes in the middle of the door and the privacy curtain had two holes in the top of the curtain. Interview at the time of observation with Resident #16 revealed the door had been that way since she moved into the room. 3. Observation on 10/16/23 at 11:52 A.M. of Resident #31's room revealed the television (TV) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility policy, observation and interivew, the facility failed to demonstrate appropriate use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when entering and exiting the room of Resident #33 who resided on the second floor and was on transmission-based precautions for COVID-19. This had the potential to affect 46 residents (Resident #14, #78, #122, #100, #5, #53, #104, #113, #8, #16, #41, #29, #57, #81, #4, #10, #76, #63, #47, #46, #68, #89, #83, #112, #42, #24, #13, #18, #27, #55, #40, #30, #25, #6, #19, #38, #73, #98, #66, #32, #107, #90, #106, #31, #60, and #21 residing on the second floor. The facility census was 125. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 05/04/21. Diagnosis included COVID-19 dated 10/12/23. Record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy, observation and interview, the facility failed to timely address a change of condition for Resident #16. This affected one resident (Resident #16) of three residents reviewed for a change in condition. The facility census was 125. Findings include: Record review for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 06/01/23 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke affecting left non-dominant side, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/07/23, revealed Resident #16 was cognitively intact, dependent with toileting and personal hygiene and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident #16 had no ulcers, wounds, or other skin problems. Record review of the care plan dated 06/14/23 revealed Resident #16 had functional bowel and bladder incontinence. Interventions included checking resident for incontinence, wash, rinse, and dry perineum, observe for signs and symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based record review, review of the facility policy, observation and interview, the facility failed to provided daily and as needed nail care to Resident #78 who required staff assistance with his activities of daily living (ADL). This affected one resident (Resident #78) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 125. Findings include: Record review for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 04/29/21 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #78 was rarely or never understood. Resident #78 required extensive assistance of two for bed mobility, toilet use, personal hygiene, and extensive assistance of one for eating. Resident #78 had an indwelling catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. Record review of the care plan dated 05/07/21 revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure all smoking supplies were secured in a locked area when not in use by independent smokers. This affected two residents (Resident #106 and #65) of two residents reviewed for smoking. The facility identified 27 residents who independently smoked at the facility. The facility census was 125. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #106 revealed an admission date of 04/02/23. Diagnosis included nicotine dependence. Record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #106 was cognitively intact. Record review of the care plan dated 04/11/23 revealed Resident #106 utilized nicotine products. Interventions included: complete smoking evaluation and educate resident / resident representative to facility smoking policy. Record review of the smoking assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #106 was an independent smoker. Observation on 10/19/23 at 3:10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of the facility policy and interview, the facility failed to follow the physician order for a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of a psychotropic medication as recommended by the licensed pharmacist for Resident #57. This affected one resident (Resident #57) of five residents reviewed for GDR of medications. The facility census was 125. Findings include: Record review for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 12/29/20. Record review of the census revealed Resident #57 resided at the facility from 08/10/22 through 10/19/23 with no hospital or discharge transfers out of the facility. Record review of the care plan dated 10/16/23 revealed Resident #57 was at risk for falls secondary to a history of falls, receiving antianxiety and antidepressant medications. Interventions included to observe medication for side effects that may increase risk for falls. Review of the Pharmacist Recommendation for the Prescriber report, dated 07/18/23, completed by Consultant Pharmacist (CP) #602 revealed Resident #57 was recently documented for multiple falls. After a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for Resident #129, who had an admitting diagnosis of embolism and thrombosis of the iliac artery and history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the bilateral lower extremities, when staff failed to administer Heparin (an anti-coagulant/blood thinner medication) according to the physician order. The facility also failed to notify the physician (PCP) and/or certified nurse practitioner (CNP) of missed doses of the medication. This affected one resident (#129) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 125. Findings include: Review of Resident #129's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation on 08/05/23 after being hospitalized from [DATE] due to a motorcycle accident requiring trauma intensive care and emergency surgery. Resident #129 was his own responsible party. Review of the hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to refer the resident to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation and determination after the resident had a psychiatric hospitalization and subsequent new mental health diagnosis. This affected one Resident (Resident #84) of ten residents (Resident #16, #19, #50, #59, #61, #84, #93, #102, #110 and #147) reviewed for PASRR. The facility census was 150. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #84 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, other schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. Review of the progress note dated 01/01/18 revealed Resident #84 had increased anxiety, suicidal ideation and complained of hearing voices in his head. On 01/02/18, Resident #84 was sent to the hospital for further evaluation, and on 01/03/18 was admitted to the psychiatric hospital. Resident #84 was subsequently readmitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices while passing a meal tray and cleaning a contact precaution room. This affected one resident (Resident #19) of two residents (Residents #19 and #148) reviewed for isolation precautions. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #19 revealed an initial admission date of 07/10/19. Diagnoses included: weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and history of enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (c diff). Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition, required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use, and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of February 2020 physician orders dated 02/10/20 revealed contact precautions every shift for diagnosis of rule out of c diff. Review of the care plan for Resident #19 with pending c. diff culture revealed interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-10-26 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information for the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) report to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). This had the potential to affect all 125 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of [NAME] PBJ Staffing data report revealed facility triggered for low weekend staffing and one star staffing for fiscal year quarter two of 2023. Interview on 10/19/23 at 1:45 P.M. with the Administrator revealed that they submit the facility staffing data to the corporate office who then reports it to CMS. Interview on 10/19/23 at 4:27 P.M. with Corporate Regional Director (CRD) #572 verified the facility triggered for low weekend staffing and one star for staffing for fiscal year quarter two of 2023. CRD #572 explained the facility staffing data was transposed inaccurately to the office responsible for sending the data to CMS resulting in the trigger of low weekend staffing and one star for staffing for quarter two of 2023.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$26,685 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $26,685 — penalty dated 2025-10-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH 3 of 5Charleston Healthcare CenterCharleston, WV

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CONSOLIDATED OP CO., LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2020
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2020
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2020
NE BAKER HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2020
THE STEPHEN L. ROSEDALE 2012 SPOUSAL TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/16/2005
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
STOLTZ, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2012
WILHEIM, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/01/2017
PEARL OHIO MGT CO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/16/2025
GINDLESPERGER, JINNALEEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2024
GREGORIN, JASONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
GROVES, DONNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
ODENTHAL, RICHARDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/10/2025
C.R. STOLTZ IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2005
GBRIER ASSET OWNERSHIP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2020
I. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2005
R.S. WILHEIM IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2005
RONALD S WILHEIM 2012 SPOUSAL TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2005
ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2005
RRW, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2005
S.L. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2005
WILHEIM FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2005

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 5%Other / private 29%

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$282per resident / day
operating cost
$8,579per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$294per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365192. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next