No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mount Vernon Healthcare Center

8111 Tiswell Drive, Alexandria, VA 22306 · For profit - Corporation · 130 certified beds · (703) 360-4000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602, F0610) — most recent Sep 2022Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0568, F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0741)1 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (16% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0610) — most recent Sep 2022
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0608, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (82) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8101 Hinson Farm Rd, #415 · (703) 799-1688 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8119 Holland Rd Rm 22 · (703) 253-7697 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7866 Richmond Hwy · (703) 781-0963 · Call to confirm hours
Park
8115 Fordson Rd · (703) 324-8732 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.7%14.9%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.0%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.2%18.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.9%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.9%15.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.2%20.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.3%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.1%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.6%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.3%73.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.1%22.3%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.1%11.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.151.521.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.991.481.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 187 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.5%CMS range 52.8–67.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.0%CMS range 6.4–12.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge38.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified87.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.8%CMS range 6.0–12.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
1.13
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.97
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.51
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
16.5%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 126.0 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 16% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-23)
56
at the previous standard inspection (2022-09-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

82 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 63 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2022-09-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to protect 5 Residents from abuse (Resident #63, #322, Resident #70, #52, #21 ) and failed to protect 2 residents from neglect (Resident #35, Resident #217) in a sample size of 60 Residents. Immediate Jeopardy was called on 09/16/2022 at 4:34 P.M. On 9/21/22 at 12:15 P.M., the survey team verified the implementation of the removal Plan submitted by the facility and the scope and severity was lowered to E at that time. The findings included: Resident #68's quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 08/02/2022, Resident #68's medical diagnoses included but were not limited to Bipolar disorder. Resident #68's Brief Interview for Mental Status was coded as 10 out of possible 15 indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. Functional status for walking in room and corridor were coded as requiring supervision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-09-29 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Resident interview, facility staff interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure Residents' were free from misappropriation and exploitation for three Residents (Resident #35, 368 and 70) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Residents #35 and #368, who were married, were victims of financial misappropriation and were exploited of money in excess of $50,000 by a facility employee, which resulted in fear of economic hardship and mistrust, which constituted harm. On 9/12/22 at 3:07 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #35. Resident #35 said, I had trouble when I first came here, thieves got hold of the books and it was a minor thing to them. I woke up one morning and the checking account was down to zero. It was an inside job, no one cared about how the books were managed. I would rather go home and do the best we can versus stay here and go broke. When asked if he worries about the ability to pay for continued care, Resident #35 said,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-09-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to investigate allegations of abuse, exploitation and mistreatment, and failed to take measures to protect residents, and failed to make corrections affecting 4 Residents (Resident #35, 368, 52, and 317) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The failure to make corrections resulted in harm for Residents #35 and #368. The findings included: 1. For Residents #35 and #368, who were married and victims of financial misappropriation and were exploited for an excess of $50,000, the facility staff failed to make corrections/restitution, which resulted in fear of economic hardship and mistrust, which constituted harm. On 9/12/22 at 3:07 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #35. Resident #35 said, I had trouble when I first came here, thieves got hold of the books and it was a minor thing to them. I woke up one morning and the checking account…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-09-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure services were provided that meet professional standards of care for 3 Residents (#'s 217, 88, and 417) in a survey sample of 60 Residents, resulting in harm for Resident #217. The findings included: 1. For Resident #217, the facility staff failed to assess, monitor and treat for Diabetes resulting in Harm. Documentation in the hospital records on admission to the facility showed orders for a Carbohydrate Controlled Diet and Glucerna Shake. Both of these were indications that Resident # 217 might have been a Diabetic. Resident #217 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of, but not limited to, Asthma, Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), Infection due to Multi-resistant organism and Morbid Obesity with BMI (Body Mass Index) 60-69. The MDS coded Resident #217 as requiring extensive to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-09-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, family interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the highest practicable well being. for two residents ( Residents # 217 and #23) in a survey sample of 60 residents. Findings: 1. For Resident #217, the facility staff failed to ensure the highest practicable well being resulting in Harm. Resident #217 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of, but not limited to, Asthma, Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), Infection due to Multi-resistant organism, and Morbid Obesity with BMI (Body Mass Index) 60-69. Review of the clinical record was conducted on [DATE]-[DATE]. Documentation in the hospital records on admission to the facility showed orders for a Carbohydrate Controlled Diet and Glucerna Shake. Both of these were indications that Resident #217 might have been a Diabetic. Review of the electronic clinical record revealed there was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-09-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure that Residents receive care, consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers from worsening or new ulcers developing for 2 Residents (Resident #111 and 86) in a survey sample of 60 Residents, resulting in harm for Resident #111. The findings included: 1. For Resident #111, the facility staff failed to identify, treat and prevent a pressure ulcer until it was found at an advanced stage, necrotic and required sharp debridement. This constituted harm. On 9/12/22, Resident #111 was observed in his room. Resident #111 indicated that he had new wounds that were not present on admission during the interview. On 4/21/22, a Braden scale assessment was conducted that revealed Resident #111 was at moderate risk for developing pressure related skin issues. A clinical record review revealed that Resident #111 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Nursing notes on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-09-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Resident family interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to prevent the development of a contracture resulting in limited range of motion, which constituted harm, for one Resident (Resident #14) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #14 who was admitted without any contractures of her hand and arm, the facility staff failed to implement therapeutic interventions to prevent the development of contractures. As a result, Resident #14 developed contractures of her fingers, wrist and elbow, and therapeutic interventions were not initiated for over three months following the identification, this constitutes harm for Resident #14. On 09/12/22 at 02:49 PM, Resident #14 was visited in her room and a family member was at the bedside. A Resident and family interview were conducted. Resident #14's family member said he is very concerned about the Resident's left hand, she is no longer able to use it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-09-29 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, Resident/family interview, staff interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide specialized rehabilitative services to prevent the functional decline for two Residents (Resident #14 and #68), resulting in harm for Resident #14, in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #14, who developed a hand/wrist contracture while a Resident of the facility, the facility staff failed to provide specialized rehabilitative services as ordered by the physician, to prevent the worsening of the contracture for a period of two months resulting in harm. On 09/12/22 at 02:49 PM, Resident #14 was visited in her room and a family member was at the bedside. A Resident and family interview were conducted. Resident #14's family member said he is very concerned about the Resident's left hand, she is no longer able to use it and when you touch it she has pain. The family member went on to say that they have talked to various staff, including but not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2019-11-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide care to promote healing prevent infection and prevent new pressure ulcers from forming for 2 Resident (#161 and #79) in a survey sample of 43 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #161 the facility staff failed to identify a pressure ulcer to the coccyx before it was found at an advanced stage with necrotic tissue. In addition, the resident went the hospital and the coccyx wound was diagnosed with an infection. Resident #161, a [AGE] year old woman admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to Multiple Sclerosis, arthritis, cellulitis, reflux and muscle weakness. Resident #161's most recent MDS ( minimum data set) coded the Resident as having a (Brief Interview of Mental Status) BIMS score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #161 was also coded as needing extensive assistance of 2 person physical assistance for bed mobility, toilet use,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a safe clean, comfortable and homelike environment for all residents of the facility. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure the parking lot was free of trash and debris, failed to ensure the entry gate was in good repair and not an accident hazard and failed to ensure that the facility was odor free. The following observations were made throughout the three days of survey: On 6/2/26 at 1p.m, within the parking lot there were two face masks and one pair of used purple latex gloves (used turned inside out as if taken off and thrown down. Litter was throughout the parking lot area and on the grass. The wrought iron gate at the front entrance was wobbly and was not secured in the concrete on one side. During the entrance conference the Administrator notified survey team of one Resident using electronic monitoring. Request was made for the electronic monitoring policy. rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had signs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and clinical record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from physical restraint for one resident (R1) in a survey sample of ten residents.For R1 the facility staff did not ensure proper the resident had the proper assessment and re-evaluations for continued use of restraints.R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include but were not limited to dysphagia post stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, tracheostomy status, gastrostomy tube, dementia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, chronic respiratory failure, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, gastro esophageal reflux disease. R1's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 5/14/26 coded R1 as having a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 00 out of 15 indicating she could not be evaluated. R1 has dementia and is nonverbal due to her trach status. She used to be able to make needs known, however due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure residents receive the necessary services to maintain good grooming, and personal hygiene, for one resident (R1) in a survey sample of ten residents.For R1 the facility staff failed to ensure the resident had adequate grooming to include nail care. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include but were not limited to dysphagia post stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, tracheostomy status, gastrostomy tube, dementia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, chronic respiratory failure, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, gastro esophageal reflux disease. R1's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 5/14/26 coded R1 as having a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 00 out of 15 indicating she could not be evaluated. R1 has dementia and is nonverbal due to her trach status. She used to be able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure receive asppropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for one resident (R1) in a survey sample of ten residents.The findings include: For R1 the facility staff failed to ensure the left hand splint was applied as ordered by the physician for the express purpose of preventing worsening of contractures. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include but were not limited to dysphagia post stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, tracheostomy status, gastrostomy tube, dementia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, chronic respiratory failure, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, gastro esophageal reflux disease. R1's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 5/14/26 coded R1 as having a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 00 out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure that tracheostomy care was provided in accordance with standards of practice for one resident (Resident 1 (R1)) in a survey sample of ten residents. The findings included: For R1the facility staff failed to use proper procedure and documentation of tracheal care and suctioning, R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include but were not limited to dysphagia post stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, tracheostomy status, gastrostomy tube, dementia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, chronic respiratory failure, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, gastro esophageal reflux disease. R1's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 5/14/26 coded R1 as having a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 00 out of 15 indicating she could not be evaluated. R1 has dementia and is nonverbal due to her trach…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to prepare, food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for all residents who recieve food from the kitchen. For all residents receiving food from the kitchen, other employee one did not wear a beard guard while preparing salads in the kitchen to reduce the risk of food contamination. On 6/3/26 at 9:00 a.m. a dietary aide (other employee 1) was observed packaging/dating the salads without a hair net or beard guard on. At 9:05 a.m., an interview was conducted with other employee 1 who stated that he forgot to put on the beard guard. At 9:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager who stated that it is the expectation of the facility that all staff use appropriate head and beard covering at all times in the kitchen. A review of the facility policy revealed the following excerpt: Authorized Kitchen Personnel Policy: .2. All authorized personnel must wear appropriate head covering while i the kitchen or production area (e.g. hair off the shoulders, confined…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility to ensure food was labeled, dated, and discarded when beyond the use by date per the facility's policy. This failure had the potential to create an environment for food-borne illnesses which could affect 123 of 123 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen.Findings include:During a tour of the kitchen on 04/20/26 at 10:30 AM with the Regional District Dietary Supervisor (RDDS), the main refrigerator revealed the following: 18 uncovered cucumbers with white spots and soft to the touch were inside an uncovered and undated cardboard box. Cut green peppers in a one-pound plastic bag. The peppers had visible white spots and were dated 04/07/26. Cut red peppers in a one-pound plastic bag. The peppers had visible white spots and were dated 04/07/26. One half pound of butter in an open wrapper on the shelf. There was no date on the package. Six pork chops in a plastic bag inside a cardboard box. The cardboard box was wet in the corner with what appeared to be leaking from the pork chop bag. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide an opportunity for residents who were registered to vote to exercise their right to vote for three of 66 residents identified by the facility as being registered voters (Resident (R) 3, R21, and R79). On 04/21/26 a special state election was held; however, the residents were not informed of the election nor aided to vote. This failure caused the residents not to be able to exercise their right to vote. Findings include:1. Review of R2's admission Record located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R2's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 03/19/26 located in the resident's EMR under the MDS tab revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 15 out 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. An interview on 04/21/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide a program of activities to support two of three sampled residents reviewed for activities (Resident (R) 67 and R79) out of 31 sampled residents. This failure has the potential to negatively impact quality of life for the affected residents. Findings include:1. Review of R67 admission Record located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular infraction with hemiplegia, and hemiparesis affecting the right side, diabetes mellitus, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and major depression. Review of R67's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 01/08/26, located in the resident's EMR under the MDS tab revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out 15 points which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of R67's Activity Preferences Interview dated 03/19/26 located…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a medication was given as ordered by the physician for one of six residents observed during medication administration out of 31 sampled residents (Resident (R) 31). Specifically, R31 was ordered by his physician to be administered a chewable aspirin tablet; however, the resident was administered an extended-release aspirin. Additionally, the aspirin was crushed prior to being administered to the resident even though the manufacturer's recommendations indicated the aspirin should not be crushed. These failures had the potential to cause the resident adverse side effects.Findings include:Review of R31's Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R31 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, dysphagia following unspecified cerebrovascular disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 63 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the urinary catheter tubing and collection bag were not in contact with the floor for one (Resident (R)67) of three residents reviewed for catheters and urinary tract infection. This failure placed the residents at risk for transmission of infection to the urinary tract.Findings include:Review of R67Resident (R)67 's admission Record located in the resident's electronic medical records tab Profile revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of R67's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/19/26 revealed the resident had an external catheter to a urinary drainage bag. Observation on 04/22/26 at 12:16 PM revealed R67's urinary drainage bag dragging on the floor. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1 had finished providing care to the R67. Observation on 04/22/26 at 12:45PM revealed R67…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation interview, facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were maintained in accordance with expiration date requirements for one of two medication storage rooms. A total of five medication units were identified as expired and remained in active storage within the medication room refrigerator, and one Tuberculin vial that had been open and used out of and not dated, creating the potential for administration beyond pharmacy's expiration dates. This indicates a failure to ensure proper monitoring, removal, and disposal of expired medications in accordance with facility policy and regulatory standards.Findings include:During an observation on 04/22/26 at 4:03 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 of the first-floor medication storage room, revealed the medication storage refrigerator contained five bags of expired Fetroja, (an intravenous (IV) antibiotic) 2 GM, (gram)/100mg (milligram). One bag had a use by date of 04/16/26 and four bags had a use by date of 04/19/26. Continued observation of the medication storage refrigerator revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that staff members were donning the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for two of four residents (Resident (R)2 and R67) reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and contact isolation from a sample of 31 residents. The facility also failed to ensure the correct signage was posted for one resident (R2) with Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA). These failures had the potential to promote the spread of infectious diseases. Findings include:1. Review of R2's admission Record located in the electronic medical records (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included left hip open wound, resistance to multiple antimicrobial drugs, congestive heart failure, extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance, resistance to carbapenem, and cutaneous abscess of the left leg. Review of R2's Physician Orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards for 1 resident, Resident #1, in a sample size of 3 residents. The findings included: For Resident #1, facility staff failed to utilize proper turning/repositioning technique while providing care. Resident #1 was discharged from the facility on 9/22/23 and therefore not available for observation and direct interview. On 11/14/23, a telephone call was placed to the last known number for Resident #1 and there was no answer. On 11/14/23, Resident #1's clinical record was reviewed in its entirety. A progress note dated 8/19/23 at 13:30 read, Resident is alert and verbally responsive and complained of pain in his right shoulder, he stated that the aid [certified nursing assistant-CNA] from last night pulled his right shoulder when she tried to turn him while doing the ADL [activities of daily living] care, upon assessment pain was rated 6/10, vital signs were stable . Resident #1 received Tylenol which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-29 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, Resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to post survey results in a place readily accessible to Residents and families, which had the potential to affect all 119 Residents residing in the facility. The findings included: On 09/13/22 at 11:00 AM, a resident Council meeting was conducted. When the group of Residents were asked if they knew where the survey results were located, all of the residents in the meeting indicated they did not know where the survey results were located. On 09/13/2022, Surveyor B toured the entire facility looking for the previous survey results, they were unable to be located. On 9/13/22 at 8:43 AM, the receptionist/Employee G, was asked where the survey results from prior surveys are located. Employee G said, They are normally kept right out in the open, they used to be on a table as you entered station 1, since they renovated I am not sure, let me ask. Employee G found a binder at the receptionist desk, located in the lobby, but noted that the binder was empty. Employee C then entered the lobby and when Employee G…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-29 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to post the required correct daily nursing staffing information which was visible to Residents, staff, and visitors, on four of four nursing units. The findings included: On 9-12-22 at approximately 11:30 AM, during initial tour of the building the daily staffing posting information was not correct, nor visibly posted. The posting continued to be incorrect on the second day of survey, 9-13-22. The posting simply had the name of staff members, and their arrival time. The posting was in a small back alcove with a desk behind the nursing station used for nurse and physician documentation and storage of documents. The posting was in the back of the alcove, not visible to anyone other than staff. On 9-13-22, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed. The DON stated she would correct it immediately. On 9-13-22, during an end of day debrief with the facility Administrator and DON, they were made aware of the above findings. No further information was provided.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-29 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide Residents with quarterly statements of their trust account/bank accounts effecting 4 Residents (Resident #2, 20, 91, and 70) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The findings included: On 9/15/22, an interview was conducted with Resident #20. Resident #20 was asked if he gets statements quarterly as to how much money is in his trust account. Resident #20 said, No, I don't get statements and I would like to know how much is in there. On 9/15/22, Resident #2 was interviewed regarding trust statements. Resident #2 said he doesn't receive any statements from the facility. On 9/19/22, Resident #70 was interviewed and stated he doesn't receive trust statements and would like to know how much is in his account. On 9/19/22 at 3:15 PM, Surveyor B went to the business office and asked to see evidence of trust statements for the last 3 quarters. Employee J, the Regional Director of Revenue Cycle said she had discovered that there was no evidence that the statements from June…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-29 · tag F0574 — pattern
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide required postings, including a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers for State Agencies, and advocacy groups, which are mandated by regulation to be accessible and understandable for the resident population. The findings included; During the surveyor's initial tour of the facility on 9-12-22 observations included all resident rooms and common areas of the two floors where residents resided in the building. No posting which listed the required names, addresses, and telephone numbers for State Agencies and advocacy groups which are accessible, and understandable to residents, could be found. The Social worker was asked where the posting could be found, and she stated it had been posted by the elevators, but was taken down during renovations, and it had not been replaced. When asked how long ago that happened, she stated she could not remember, and further stated it was awhile ago. On 9-13-22 the LPN unit Manager was asked about the posting, and she stated they were going to replace it. On 9-14-22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to maintain a Resident's personal privacy and failed to protect personal health information for 3 Residents (Resident #35, 268, and 78) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #35, the facility staff failed to provide a privacy curtain to ensure the Resident's personal privacy and dignity were protected during ADL (activities of daily living) care. On 9/14/22 at 9:30 AM, Resident #35 was visited in his room. The Resident requested of the surveyor, Can you see about getting me a privacy curtain. Surveyor B observed that there was no privacy curtain around Resident #35's bed. When asked where he changes clothes or takes a bath he said, Well, now I have to go into the bathroom to do it. On 9/14/22 at approximately 9:45 AM, an interview was conducted with CNA D. CNA D was asked what the purpose of a privacy curtain is, CNA D said, To protect their privacy. When asked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and home like environment for one Resident (Resident #46) and on two of two nursing units. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to maintain Resident rooms and bathrooms in a clean, comfortable and homelike manner for multiple Residents residing on both of the nursing units. a. On 9/12/22, during initial tour Surveyor B observed that a Resident residing in a room on the first floor, Colonial hall that had splatters and lines of a tan colored substance running down the wall at the head of the bed that were dried. Throughout the entire survey, which concluded on 9/22/22, Surveyor B observed the splatters and lines without any improvements noted. b. On 9/14/22, Surveyor B observed the following in a Resident room on the first floor, [NAME] hall. A bathroom with a large section of wall paper missing that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. For Resident # 217, the facility staff failed to implement the policies on abuse/neglect Resident # 217 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled services in nursing and therapy with the diagnoses of, but not limited to, Asthma, Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), Infection due to Multi-resistant organism and Morbid Obesity with BMI (Body Mass Index) 60-69. Review of the Resident # 217's closed clinical record revealed the most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) was a Quarterly Assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 9/16/2021. The MDS coded Resident #217 as requiring extensive to total assistance of one to two staff persons with activities of daily living and frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the closed clinical record was conducted on 9/12/2018 through 9/22/2022. Review of the Progress Notes revealed documentation of a nurses note dated 5/28/2020 at 8:19 a.m. which stated:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record reviews, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to report allegations of abuse timely for 7 Residents (Resident #52, Resident #117, Resident #31, Resident #84, Resident #367, Resident #369, Resident #19) in a sample size of 60 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #52, the facility staff failed to report the allegation of abuse to the state agency and adult protective services timely. On 09/13/2022 at 11:00 A.M., a Resident Council meeting with 6 Residents was conducted. At 11:18 A.M., the Social Worker entered the Resident Council meeting. When this surveyor asked the social worker why she was entering the meeting, Resident #88 stated he invited the social worker to the meeting. When the other Residents were asked about this, the other Residents in attendance also indicated they would like the social worker to be present. The meeting resumed and when the Residents were asked if call bells were answered timely, Resident #52 stated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, family interview, staff interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to revise the care plan for 7 Resident (Resident #318, Resident #78, Resident #68, Resident #318, Resident #86, Resident #35, Resident #14) in a sample size of 60 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #318, the facility staff failed to address communication on the care plan. On 09/12/2022 at 3:50 P.M., Resident #318 was observed awake in her bed. When asked if she had any concerns about the care received at the facility, Resident #318 spoke in a foreign language. There were no communication aids or language line number observed at the bedside. On 09/13/2022, Resident #318's clinical record was reviewed. Under the Assessment tab in the electronic health record, there was no evidence Resident #78's understanding of the English language was assessed. According to the Face Sheet under the section Primary Language, it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure that required competencies were completed for 6 of 6 nursing staff members including, Registered Nurses (RN), Certified Nursing Aides (CNA), and Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN). The survey sample of 6 consisted of; (RN/DON), (CNA B), (CNA C), (CNA F), (LPN F), and (LPN G). The Facility failed to complete required initial, and annual, competency training, and evaluations. The Findings included: On 9-14-22 a review was requested for employee education/training and competency evaluations. The facility Administrator was asked for employee records for the 6 staff members. Each day from 9-14-22 through 9-18-22 the employee records were requested, and surveyors were told by the Administrator oh yes, I have them on my desk, I will send them to your email. On 9-19-22 education records and evaluation information was received. There were 4 of the 6 included and a call was placed to the Administrator to ask for the other 2 missing documents. The Administrator stated We can find nothing for those…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-29 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure that required annual performance reviews, with in-service training based on those reviews, were completed for 3 of 3 Certified Nursing Aides (CNA) in the survey sample, (CNA B), (CNA C), and (CNA F). The Findings included: On 9-14-22 a review was requested for CNA employee Performance reviews and training records. The facility Administrator was asked for employee records for the 3 staff members. Each day from 9-14-22 through 9-18-22 the employee records were requested, and surveyors were told by the Administrator oh yes, I have them on my desk, I will send them to your email. On 9-19-22 two of the requested 3 CNA records were received. A call was placed to the Administrator to ask for the other missing documents. The Administrator stated We can find nothing for that employee. The 2 that were received stated on the email from the Administrator the following; CNA (C) (name) does not have an annual eval on file, CNA (B) (name) has none, and no mention was given for the other CNA (F), which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-29 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — pattern
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure that required knowledge of, appropriate training for, and competencies were completed to care for residents with mental, psychological, and psycosocial disorders for 6 of 6 nursing staff members including, Registered Nurses (RN), Certified Nursing Aides (CNA), and Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN). The survey sample of 6 consisted of: (RN/DON), (CNA B), (CNA C), (CNA F), (LPN F), and (LPN G). The Findings included: The Facility failed to complete required initial, and annual, competency training, and evaluations. On 9-14-22 a review was requested for employee education/training and competency evaluations. The facility Administrator was asked for employee records for the 6 staff members. Each day from 9-14-22 through 9-18-22 the employee records were requested, and surveyors were told by the Administrator oh yes, I have them on my desk, I will send them to your email. On 9-19-22 education records and evaluation information was received. There were 4 of the 6 included and a call was placed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure Residents were free of significant medication errors for 2 Residents (#'s 88, & 86) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The findings included 1. For Resident #88 the facility staff failed to ensure the correct administration of the anticoagulant Lovenox (generic name Enoxaparin Sodium) was ordered and given as directed by the physician. On 9/13/22 at approximately 2:00 PM an interview was conducted with Resident # 88 who stated that he has been getting the wrong dose of medication for his blood clots and just found out this week it was the wrong dose. He stated his doctor that he sees for his blood clot had put him on shots in the stomach and the medication should have been 100 mg every 12 hrs. But that he was only getting 80 mg. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident #88 had physician's orders that read: 8/11/22 8:15 PM Enoxaparin Sodium Injection Solution Prefilled Syringe 100 MG/ML (Enoxaparin Sodium) Inject 1 ml subcutaneously every morning and at bedtime for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to properly store Drugs and Biological's for 2 of the facility's 4 medication carts. The Findings Included: On 9/21/22 while completing the medication administration facility tasks Surveyor D made the following observations: At 2:50 PM on the Colonial Hall cart 1, observed artificial tears eye drops labeled with the Resident name and room number as well as the opened date on the box only, LPN L was asked was asked what the process was for labeling medications and she stated that the name, and date opened should be on the box on the bottle as well. When asked why she stated that if it's not labeled correctly the medication could get mixed up with someone else's. At 2:53 PM on the [NAME] Hall cart 1, observed artificial tears eye drops labeled with the Resident name and room number as well as the opened date on the box only, LPN M was asked was asked what the process was for labeling medications and she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention control program to prevent the development and spread of diseases and infections for 1 Resident (#88), and the facility as a whole. In addition, 8 facility staff on 4 of 4 units failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program. The findings included: 1. For Resident #88 the facility staff failed to ensure proper care and cleaning of Resident #88's suprapubic catheter. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident #88 was brought to the hospital by his fiancée on 8/5/22 and was admitted with a diagnosis of Poly-Microbial (more than one bacteria) UTI (Urinary Tract Infection). The identified bacteria were: Providencia Stuartii. Enterococcus Fecalis Providencia, P. rettgeri and P. stuartii are the most common cause of catheter-associated urinary tract infections, especially in the elderly with long-term indwelling urinary catheters. While, both of these bacteria are normal when found in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-29 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to conduct COVID-19 testing in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance for 4 Residents, Residents #6, #35, #111, and #88, in a sample of 5 Residents reviewed for resident COVID-19 testing. The findings included: For Residents #6 and #35, facility staff failed to conduct COVID-19 testing for admission/re-admission to the facility and for Resident #111, facility staff did not document the results of COVID-19 testing in the clinical record. 1. For Resident #6, the facility staff failed to conduct COVID-19 testing upon her re-admission to the facility on 8/19/22. On 9/14/22, a clinical record review was conducted and revealed that Resident #6 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] following her admission to the local hospital on 8/12/22. There was no evidence of any COVID-19 testing until 8/22/22. 2. For Resident #35, the facility staff failed to conduct COVID-19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-29 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure that required training for Abuse/neglect, misappropriation, exploitation, dementia management, and abuse prevention were conducted for all 6 of the employees in the employee sample, (RN/DON), (CNA B), (CNA C), (CNA F), (LPN F), and (LPN G). The Findings included: The Facility failed to complete required abuse and dementia competency training, and evaluations. On 9-14-22 a review was requested for employee education/training and competency evaluations. The facility Administrator was asked for employee records for the 6 staff members. Each day from 9-14-22 through 9-18-22 the employee records were requested, and surveyors were told by the Administrator oh yes, I have them on my desk, I will send them to your email. On 9-19-22 education records and evaluation information was received. There were 4 of the 6 included and a call was placed to the Administrator to ask for the other 2 missing documents. The Administrator stated We can find nothing for those employees. The 4 that were received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-29 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure that the required 12 hours per year of in-service training was completed for Certified Nursing Aides (CNA's). The survey sample of of 3 CNA's consisted of; (CNA B), (CNA C), and (CNA F). The Findings included: The Facility failed to ensure 12 hours of training annually for CNA's. On 9-14-22 a review was requested for employee education/training and competency evaluations. The facility Administrator was asked for employee records for the 6 staff members. Each day from 9-14-22 through 9-18-22 the employee records were requested, and surveyors were told by the Administrator oh yes, I have them on my desk, I will send them to your email. On 9-19-22 education records and evaluation information was received. There were 2 of the 3 included and a call was placed to the Administrator to ask for the other missing document. The 2 that were received stated on the email from the Administrator the following; CNA (C) (name) does not have an annual eval on file, CNA (B) (name) has none. No mention was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    On 09/13/2022 at 9:30 A.M., Resident #90 was observed asleep in her bed with the head of the bed elevated approximately 60 degrees. Resident #90 had a plaid clothing protector on with food particles on it. The tray table with the breakfast tray was positioned over the bed and in front of Resident #90. All the food had been eaten off the plate. There was no staff in the room. At 9:36 A.M., Certified Nursing Assistant N (CNA N) entered Resident #90's room, took the tray off the tray table, exited the room, and placed the tray on the cart in the hall. CNA N then re-entered Resident #90's room, walked past Resident #90, and took the roommate's tray to the cart in the hall. CNA N then proceeded to the adjacent room and removed those breakfast trays. At 9:50 A.M., Resident #90 was observed still sleeping with the head of the bed elevated approximately 60 degrees, and the plaid clothing protector on with food particles on it. At 10:00 A.M., CNA N was interviewed. When asked about the process of assisting a Resident after mealtime, CNA N stated that afterwards, she would assist the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-29 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assess and determine if a Resident was safe to self-administer medications, for one Resident (Resident #35) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #35, who had medications stored in his room, the facility staff failed to assess if Resident #35 was safe to self-administer medications and removed the medications, stating it was not permitted. On 9/13/22 at 9:28 PM, Resident #35 was observed awake and sitting on the edge of his bed. A Resident interview was conducted and during this interview Resident #35 was observed with a bottle of Tums/antacid tablets on his bed and in the bottom of his bed side table several prescription bottles were observed. On 9/13/22 at 9:31 PM, an interview was conducted with LPN D. When asked if she has any Residents that self-administer medications and are permitted to keep them in their room, she said, No, we have to keep all medications in the medication cart, we don't allow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility record review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure the right of self-determination for 1 Resident (#31) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #31, the Resident had made it clear to staff she wanted only female CNA's to work with her, as evidenced by the care plan entry dated 6/10/22, however, they continued to schedule male CNA's to be assigned to her. On 9/21/22 at approximately 10:30 AM an interview was conducted with Resident #31 who stated, I don't want none of those men undressing me. Resident #31 stated, I told him No and he got angry and banged his fist on the table it was threatening. I was afraid he would come back. On 9/20/21 an interview with the DON was conducted and she was informed of the Resident's complaint she stated she was aware and they had addressed it in the care plan meeting in June. When told that the Resident stated it had happened a few days ago, the DON stated that Resident #31 has dementia and is confused about the time. A review of the Concern Forms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Resident interview, staff interviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to permit Residents to access their personal funds/trust accounts on weekends and evenings, for Residents with trust accounts. The findings included: On 9/13/22 at 10:20 AM, an interview was conducted with the receptionist/Employee G. Employee G confirmed that a staff member is at the receptionist desk from 7 AM until 8 PM, Monday through Friday and on weekends from 8 AM until 8 PM. On 9/15/22, Resident #2 was interviewed regarding his access to his trust account. Resident #2 said he had to go downstairs to the business office to make withdrawals and they are only open Monday-Friday. On 9/19/22 at 3:15 PM, an interview was held with Employees CC/the assistant regional director of finance and Employee J, the divisional director of revenue cycle. They reported, We have banking hours. On 9/19/22 at 4:40 PM, an interview was conducted with Employee G/the receptionist. Employee G was asked how Residents access or withdraw money from their trust account. Employee G said, They go to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, family interview, clinical record review and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide one resident ( Resident # 217) with a conveyance of funds within 30 days. Findings included: For Resident # 217, the facility staff did not convey funds within 30 days. Resident # 217 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident # 217 did not return to the facility. Review of the Personal Funds account for Resident # 217 revealed documentation that the account was not reconciled until [DATE]. Resident # 217 transferred from the facility on [DATE]. A check was written on [DATE] but was not cashed. An audit in [DATE] revealed the check had not been cashed. The facility staff voided the check and wrote another check in [DATE]. The final check was written on [DATE] and cashed on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 2 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Regional Business Office Consultant (Employee J) who stated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0571 — isolated
    Limit the charges against residents' personal funds for items or services for which payment is made under Medicare or Medicaid.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Resident interview, staff interviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to only withdraw funds authorized for the cost of care for one Resident (Resident #70) in a sample of 3 Residents reviewed for trust fund transactions. The findings included: For Resident #70, the facility withdrew funds monthly in excess of what was due to the facility for the Resident's cost of care as directed by Medicaid. On 9/19/22, Resident #70 disclosed during an interview concerns about money received not being deposited into his bank account/trust fund. On 9/19/22, Surveyor B asked for a transaction history of Resident #70's account and the patient liability (amount Resident is responsible to pay towards cost of care when on Medicaid) from the Virginia Medicaid web portal. The requested items were received and reviewed. The findings were as follows: 1. August 2021-September 2022, Medicaid indicated that Resident #70 was responsible to pay $838.00 per month as his patient liability. 2. For the months of August, September, October, November, and December 2021, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to offer and/or provide Advance Directive planning for 2 residents, Resident #35 and Resident #111, out of a sample of 10 residents reviewed for Advance Directives. The findings included: The facility staff failed to offer and/or provide Resident #35 or their Responsible Party (RP) with Advance Directive planning. On 9/14/22, clinical record review was performed for Resident #35 and Resident #111 which revealed the following: 1. Resident #35 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] following a hospital admission on [DATE]. Physician orders and patient profile read, Full Code status which indicated that Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation would be initiated in the event of cardiac and/or respiratory arrest. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), Assessment Reference Date (ARD) on 7/13/22 indicated that Resident #35 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, cognitively intact. 2. The facility staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-29 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to complete a SNF (skilled nursing facility) NOMNC (notice of Medicare non-coverage) and ABN (advance beneficiary notice) timely and accurately for 2 Residents (Resident #417 and #35) in a survey sample of 3 Residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notifications. The findings included: 1. For Resident # 417, the facility staff failed to issue a NOMNC timely, therefore the Resident was not afforded the opportunity to file an appeal if she so desired. Resident #417, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], for skilled care. Resident #417 was issued a NOMNC on 3/31/21, which notified her that her skilled stay would end on 4/1/22. This notice did not afford the Resident adequate time to file an appeal if she chose to. Per the NOMNC, it read, Your request for an immediate appeal should be made as soon as possible, but no later than noon the day before the effective date indicated above. The appeal would have had to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, Resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record reviews, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to promptly respond to grievances for 2 Residents (Resident #46, Resident #68) in a sample size of 60 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #46, the facility staff failed to promptly respond after being notified of baseboards loose/missing in room as well as extensive scuff marks and stains on floor, baseboards, and walls. For Resident #46, the facility staff failed to maintain a comfortable homelike environment as evidenced by scuff marks and stains on the floor, baseboards, and walls. Also, there were strips of scotch tape on wall across from Resident #46's bed with ripped paper attached. Also, the baseboard next to Resident #46's bed was separating from the wall and the baseboard to the right of the bathroom door was gone, revealing a small hole in the wall and ripped drywall. On 09/13/2022 at 9:20 A.M., Resident #46 was observed lying in his bed. When asked about concerns with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0608 — failed to report suspected crimes — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure (1) employees report any suspicion of a crime against any resident, according to timelines; (2) post the notice of employee rights; and (3) prohibit and prevent retaliation for reporting.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed implement their policy with regards to reporting crimes affecting 3 Residents (Resident #35, #368, and 217) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #35, whose wife was a former Resident #368, reported that money was missing from their joint bank account, the facility staff failed to report timely an allegation of misappropriation and exploitation in excess of $50,000. On 9/12/22 at 3:07 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #35. Resident #35 said, I had trouble when I first came here, thieves got hold of the books and it was a minor thing to them. I woke up one morning and the checking account was down to zero. It was an inside job, no one cared about how the books were managed. On 9/15/22 at 4 PM, a follow-up interview was conducted with Resident #35. He stated, $70,000 was taken. We used a check to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility record review, the facility staff failed for 1 resident (Resident #119) to provide the resident with a necessary and safe discharge, in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The Findings included: The facility unnecessarily, and unsafely discharged Resident #119, did not apply for timely insurance coverage for a needed continuance of stay, and further failed to involve, evaluate, and provide Resident #119 with an interdisciplinary discharge plan. No community services were planned, no written discharge instructions were planned, nor given to the Resident, no medical equipment was obtained for discharge home, and the facility did not document a recapitulation of the Resident's stay in the clinical record. Resident #119 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on 7-8-22 (6 weeks later). Resident #119's diagnosis included; Heart disease, Heart Failure, Diabetes, chronic kidney disease, stroke, obesity, a sacral pressure sore, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to notify the Long Term Care ombudsman of the discharge of one Resident (Resident # 217) in a survey sample of 60 residents and the facility staff failed to notify the Ombudsman of any discharges during a 4 month period of time (October 2021-January 2022). Findings included: 1. For Resident # 217, the facility staff failed to notify the Ombudsman of the transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. The facility staff did not notify the Ombudsman of any discharges in October 2021 to January 2022. Resident # 217 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of, but not limited to, Asthma, Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), Infection due to Multi-resistant organism and Morbid Obesity with BMI (Body Mass Index) 60-69. The MDS coded Resident #217 as requiring extensive to total assistance of one to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility failed to issue an accurate written bed hold notice for 1 resident (Resident #217) of 60 residents in the survey sample. Findings included: For Resident # 217, the Bed Hold Authorization form was signed but incomplete. There were blanks in the documents. Resident # 217 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of, but not limited to, Asthma, Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), Infection due to Multi-resistant organism, and Morbid Obesity with BMI (Body Mass Index) 60-69. The MDS coded Resident #217 as requiring extensive to total assistance of one to two staff persons with activities of daily living and frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the electronic clinical record was conducted 9/12/2022 - 9/22/2022, including a review of the miscellaneous forms, revealed a document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review,and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate MDS/RAI assessment was completed for one resident (Resident #217) in a survey sample of 60 residents. Findings included: 1. For Resident # 217, the facility staff failed to complete Section C: Cognitive Patterns in a Quarterly assessment dated [DATE]. Resident # 217 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of, but not limited to, Asthma, Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), Infection due to Multi-resistant organism, and Morbid Obesity with BMI (Body Mass Index) 60-69. Review of the clinical record was conducted on 9/12/2022-9/22/2022. Review revealed the most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was a Quarterly Assessment with an ARD of 9/16/2021. Review of Section C for Cognitive Patterns revealed Section C0100 asked the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observations, Staff interview, and clinical record review, facility staff failed to refer 1 Resident (Resident #77) with a serious mental illness for a level 2 PASARR, in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #77 a PASARR II was not completed despite diagnoses of serious Mental Illness, schizophrenia, Bipolar I & II, delusions, psychosis, Cyclothymic disorder, psychotic disorder, behaviors, and behavior management. Resident #77 was readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included the above, as well as, Diabetes, Hyperlipidemia, anemia, heart failure and renal insufficiency. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was a quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8-12-2020. The Brief Interview for Mental Status scored as 11 of a possible 15, indicating mild cognitive impairment. On 9-15-22, a review of Resident #77's record was conducted. The diagnoses associated with the Resident's serious mental illness were noted. The Director of Nursing (DON) was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, facility staff failed to ensure PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) prior to admission, for 1 Resident (#34) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #34 the facility staff failed to ensure a PASRR was completed prior to his admission on [DATE]. On 9/13/22 a review of the clinical record revealed that Resident #34 did not have a completed PASRR on admission. The Social Worker at the facility completed the PASRR after he arrived at the facility, however, she did not complete the PASRR. The Social Worker completed boxes 1-4 however she did not complete box #5 which is the box that read: Recommendation (either a or b must be checked) She did not check either a (recommending a level 2) or b (stating why a level 2 was not appropriate for this resident). On the morning of 9/15/22 the Social Worker was interviewed and she was asked if the PASRR is complete and she stated that it was not. When asked why…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that includes instructions needed to provide and effective person-centered care for 1 Resident (#34) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The Findings included; For Resident # 34 the facility staff failed to address the Resident's lack of communication as he does not speak English. On 9/12/22 at approximately 2:00 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #34's son. Resident #34's son stated that his father did not speak English. When asked how he communicates with the facility staff he stated, he doesn't. He stated that he has to speak for his father because his father cannot speak English. When asked if they had given the Resident some kind of pictures to show what he needs like food, drink, or toilet. He stated that he has been in the facility every day and has not seen anyone use communication board since his admission on [DATE]. On 9/14/22 an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive care plan for 3 Residents (Resident #90, Resident #23, Resident #34) in a sample size of 60 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #90, the facility staff failed to include Activities of Daily Living on the comprehensive care plan. On 09/13/2022 at 9:30 A.M., Resident #90 was observed asleep in her bed with the head of the bed elevated approximately 60 degrees. Resident #90 had a plaid clothing protector on with food particles on it. The tray table with the breakfast tray was positioned over the bed and in front of Resident #90. All the food had been eaten off the plate. There was no staff in the room. At 9:36 A.M., Certified Nursing Assistant N (CNA N) entered Resident #90's room, took the tray off the tray table, exited the room, and placed the tray on the cart in the hall. CNA N then re-entered Resident #90's room, walked past…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility record review, the facility staff failed for 1 resident (Resident #119) to provide the resident with a discharge plan that met the needs of the Resident, in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The facility failed to involve, evaluate, and provide Resident #119 with an interdisciplinary discharge plan. No community services were planned, no written discharge instructions were planned, nor given to the Resident, and no medical equipment was obtained for discharge home. The Findings included: Resident #119 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on 7-8-22 (6 weeks later). Resident #119's diagnosis included; Heart disease, Heart Failure, Diabetes, chronic kidney disease, stroke, obesity, a sacral pressure sore, and hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), which was a 30-Day Assessment was reviewed and coded Resident #119 as having intact cognition. The Resident was his own responsible party. On 9-21-22, a review was conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility record review, the facility staff failed for 1 resident (Resident #119) to provide a recapitulation of the Resident's stay upon discharge, in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The facility failed to document a recapitulation of the Resident's stay in the clinical record after his discharge. The Findings included: Resident #119 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on 7-8-22 (6 weeks later). Resident #119's diagnosis included; Heart disease, Heart Failure, Diabetes, chronic kidney disease, stroke, obesity, a sacral pressure sore, and hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), which was a 30-Day Assessment was reviewed and coded Resident #119 as having intact cognition. The Resident was his own responsible party. On 9-21-22, a review was conducted of Resident #119's clinical record. The Resident discharged home on 7-8-22. There was no record of discharge planning, no discharge plan completed in the care plan nor in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide necessary care and services to ensure Residents have the means to communicate with others for 3 Residents (Resident #78, Resident #318, Resident #34) in a sample size of 60 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #78 (whose primary language is not English), the facility staff failed to provide interpretive services as a means to effectively communicate. On 09/12/2022 at 12:45 P.M., Resident #78 was observed in bed awake. When I asked if she had any concerns about the care received at the facility, Resident #78 motioned to their neck and pointed to her roommate, Resident #38. Roommate (Resident #38) stated that [Resident #78] cannot speak but responds to yes/no questions. The Roommate (Resident #38) also stated that [Resident #78]'s primary language is not English. This surveyor observed there were no communication aids in the room and no information about a language…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, Resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record reviews, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 3 Residents (Resident #38, Resident #34 and Resident #35) in a sample size of 60 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #38, the facility staff to provide showers for her in August and September 2022 which was her personal preference. On 09/13/2022, the facility staff provided a copy of their policy entitled, Routine Resident Care. In Section (3)(a)(b)(i)(1) documented, Provide routine daily care by a certified nursing assistant under the supervision of a licensed nurse. (b) Routine care by a nursing assistant includes but is not limited to the following (i) assisting or provides for personal care (1) bathing. On 09/20/2022 at 11:30 A.M., Resident #38 was interviewed. When asked about receiving assistance with bathing, Resident #38 stated she gets bed baths but would really prefer a shower. Resident #38…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards for one Resident (Resident #27) of 60 residents in the survey sample. The findings included: For Resident #27 the facility staff failed to supervise a confused known fall risk resident who recently suffered facial fractures as the result of an unwitnessed fall. The Resident was in his room in a geri (reclining) chair with the bedside curtain closed obscuring the Resident from view, no fall mats in place, and his helmet off. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including; Covid-19, Rhabdomyolysis, Dementia, psychotic disturbance, anxiety, and history of multiple falls. The Resident required total dependence on staff for all activities of daily living. The Resident was able to stand independently. On 9-15-22 at 4:00 p.m. Resident #27 was observed by 2 surveyors alone in his room. The privacy curtain had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure services for care of a suprapubic catheter consistent with professional standards of care, the comprehensive care plan and Resident preferences for 1 Resident (#88) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #88 the facility staff failed to ensure proper and timely care for a suprapubic catheter (a suprapubic catheter is a tube inserted into the bladder through an incision in the abdomen, to drain urine into a collection bag.) On 9/12/22 at 12:00 PM and again on the morning of 9/13/22 Resident # 88 was observed with this suprapubic catheter collection bag hanging from the back of his wheel chair near the handle above his waist height. On 9/13/22 at approximately 10 AM an interview was conducted with Resident #88 and he was asked if it was usual practice for the staff to hang his collection bag for his catheter on the wheel chair handle and he stated that it was. On 9/13/22 at approximately 11:00 AM, during a Resident Council meeting,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide comprehensive behavioral health services for one Resident (Resident #68) in a sample of 60 Residents. The findings included: Resident #68 was not receiving supportive therapy as recommended by the Mental Health Nurse Practitioner. Resident #68's clinical record was reviewed. According to Resident #68's quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 08/02/2022, Resident #68's medical diagnoses included but were not limited to Bipolar disorder. A nurse's note dated 06/01/2022 at 4:53 P.M. documented, Note Text: Writer was called to resident [#68] room by activity staff that the resident pushed his roommate's [Resident #70] face. Immediately writer went to the resident's room and the activity staff said she came to the resident's room to do an assessment on the resident's roommate at about 10:20 am. While the activity staff was conducting her UDA assessment on the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide routine and emergency drugs to meet the needs of residents and failed to provide safekeeping of hard scripts for controlled drugs, for 2 Residents (Resident #86 and 68) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #86 the facility staff failed to obtain ordered narcotic pain medication, causing the Resident to wait 3 days for ordered pain medicine. On 9/12/22 a review of Resident #86's clinical record revealed she had pain medication ordered as follows: Oxycodone 5 mg [milligrams] / 5 ml [milliliters 5 ml via PEG-Tube every 8 hours for pain beginning on admission 8/13/22. The following are excerpts from Resident #86's nursing progress notes: 9/2/22 3:09 PM-eMar -Medication Administration Note Note Text: oxycodone HCl Oral Solution 5 MG/5ML Give 5 ml via PEG-Tube every 8 hours for pain Pharmacy stated resident needs script . 9/8/2022 4:24 PM eMar -Medication Administration Note Note Text: oxycodone HCl Oral Solution 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility record review, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 Resident was free from unnecessary medications (Resident #101) in a survey sample of 33 Residents. The findings included: Resident #101 received Atenolol anti-hypertensive medication, Dexamethasone anti-inflammatory steroid medication, and Metronidazole antibiotic medication against physician ordered parameters. Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to; hypertension. Resident #101's most recent Minimum Data Set assessment (a federal assessment protocol) was a discharge assessment dated [DATE]. Review of the physician's orders and Medication Administration Record (MAR), in the clinical record, revealed the following; 1. Ordered 7-10-22 - Atenolol for high blood pressure - 100 MG (milligrams) in the morning, hold for systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 110. The Atenolol unnecessary medication was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed ensure the nutritional needs and special diet orders 1 Resident (#86) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #86 the facility staff failed to obtain orders for the tube feeding formula (i.e. Jevity 1.2); the facility staff only received orders for the tube feeding flushes on admission. On 9/12/22 at approximately 4:00 PM the following observation was made: Tube feed Jevity 1.2 was hanging and infusing via enteral pump at 45 ml per hour. The 60 ml piston syringe was not dated and the tube feeding was not dated nor was the tubing. On 9/13/22 a review of the clinical record revealed that Resident # 86 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphasia, failure to thrive, and a peg tube had been inserted at the hospital. Per signed admission orders the Resident had orders for flushing the G Tube both PRN (as needed) and routine flushing before and after feeding and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0888 — isolated
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to have an accurate system to track the immunization status, provide COVID-19 immunizations, and provide COVID-19 booster immunizations for two employees (Employee GG and CNA-X) in a survey sample of 6 employees reviewed. The findings included: On 9/12/2022, the facility staff provided the survey team with a copy of the staff vaccination matrix. On 9/13/2022 at 10:30 a.m., review of the matrix revealed five employees listed as not vaccinated. There were 19 employees listed as not Boosted. On 9/13/2022 at 2:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist who stated all of the employees were fully vaccinated and that there were no employees with an exemption. When asked about the 5 employees listed as unvaccinated, the Infection Preventionist stated the Administrator must have scanned the wrong documents. She stated she updates the forms every day and that there were multiple copies. The Infection Preventionist stated she would send the correct copy of the vaccination matrix. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide a functional bedside table for one Resident (Resident #35) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. The findings included: On 9/14/22 at 9:30 AM, Surveyor B visited Resident #35 in his room. Surveyor B observed the bedside table, which had 3 drawers. The top drawer had no handle and the second drawer the handle was broken and attached on only one side. Resident #35 was asked how he accesses items in the top drawer and he said he couldn't. On 9/14/22 at approximately 9:45 AM, an interview was conducted with Employee F, the Maintenance Director. Employee F described the process by which he is made aware of items needing repair as an electronic system that any employee is able to enter maintenance requests into. Employee F provided Surveyor B with a listing of maintenance work orders that had not been completed and Resident #35's bedside table was not noted on the list. Employee F accompanied Surveyor B to the room of Resident #35. Employee F made an observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards for three Residents (Resident #86, #107, #2) in a survey sample of 43 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #86 the facility staff failed to following nursing standard of practice by failure to observe a Resident (Resident #86) take medication, and left medication at the bedside. Resident #86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #86's diagnoses included but were not limited to: Spinal Stenosis, Urinary tract infection, obstructive and reflux uropathy, degenerative disease of the nervous system, cirrhosis of liver, acute kidney failure, hemochromatosis, hydronephrosis, and muscle weakness. Resident #86's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/15/19 was coded as an admission assessment. Resident #86 was coded as having had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain respect and dignity for one resident (Resident #261) in a sample size of 43 residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident # 261, the facility staff failed to ensure a dignified experience during an admission skin assessment. Resident # 261 was woken up between 1:00 am and 1:30 am for a skin assessment. Resident # 261 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of, but not limited to, Anxiety Disorder, Insomnia, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Wedge Compression Fracture of first Lumbar Vertebra, Low Back Pain, muscle weakness and lack of coordination. Resident #261 did not have a Minimum Data Set (MDS) because she had only recently been admitted . Resident # 261 stayed in the facility for 3 days and was discharged on 6/25/2018. Review of the clinical record was conducted on 11/6/2019 at 2:30 PM. Review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 6/25/2018 revealed:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-08 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assess a Resident to determine if they were safe to administer medications, before leaving medications at the bedside for one Resident (Resident #86) in a survey of 43 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #86 the facility staff left medications at the bedside for the Resident when the Resident had not been assessed or determined to be clinically appropriate to self administer medications. Resident #86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #86's diagnoses included but were not limited to: Spinal Stenosis, Urinary tract infection, obstructive and reflux uropathy, degenerative disease of the nervous system, cirrhosis of liver, acute kidney failure, hemochromatosis, hydronephrosis, and muscle weakness. Resident #86's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/15/19 was coded as an admission assessment. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide accommodations to call for assistance for 1 resident (Resident #41) in a survey sample of 43 residents. The findings include: For Resident #41, the callbell was located beyond his reach, making it unavailable for him to call for assistance. Resident #41, an [AGE] year old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to muscle weakness, anemia, and contracture of the right knee. Resident #41's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/18/2019 was coded as an annual assessment. Resident #41 was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 out of possible 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. He was coded requiring extensive assistance for all of his ADL's (activities of daily living). On 11/5/19 at approximately 10:15 am during initial tour, Resident #41 was observed lying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-08 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to: 1) provide notification of non-coverage in a timely fashion for one of three sampled residents (Resident #315 ) and 2) complete an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) for one of three sampled residents (Resident #12 ) The findings included: A review of Resident #315's Notice to Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC) while on survey revealed that the effective date coverage would end was 07/17/2019 and Resident #315 signed and dated the NOMNC 07/16/2019. A review of the ABN for Resident #12 revealed that although it was signed and dated by the responsible party, an option pertaining to the care and cost was not selected. On 11/08/19 at 09:33 AM, an interview with Employee P, the social worker, was conducted. When asked about the process for issuing NOMNCs and ABNs, Employee P stated that the NOMNC and ABN should be signed 48 to 72 hours, mostly 72 hours in advance. When asked why it was important to have more than a one day notice, Employee P stated To have enough notice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Resident and staff interview facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 3 Residents (#73, 75, #66) in a survey sample of 43 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #73 the facility staff failed to care plan scheduled nebulizer treatments and changing of tubing for nebulizer. Resident #73, a [AGE] year old woman admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to Chronic Respiratory Failure, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), Trach, G-Tube, dysphagia, dementia, major depressive disorder, psychosis, anxiety disorder, and seizures. Resident # 73's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of [DATE] codes the Resident as being extensive assist with 2 person physical assistance for bed mobility, transfers and dressing and total assistance with physical assistance of 1 for bathing, feeding, and mobility. Resident #73 uses a wheel chair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed, for one resident (Resident # 79) in the survey sample of 43 residents, to review and revise the plan of care. The Findings included: 1. For Resident #79, the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan after the development of unstageable pressure ulcers on his left ankle and left heel. Resident #79 was a [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #79's diagnoses included Cerebral Infarction, Generalized Muscle Weakness, Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder Hypertension, and Congestive Heart Failure. The Minimum Data Set, which was a Significant Change Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 10/11/19 was reviewed. Resident #79 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 12, indicating mildly impaired cognition. He was coded as requiring the extensive physical assistance of at least two people for bed mobility, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility documentation review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure residents are free of significant medication errors for one Resident (Resident #107) in a survey sample of 43 Residents. The findings include: 1a. For Resident #107 the facility staff failed to administer insulin as ordered by the physician on 6 of 16 scheduled doses. Resident #107, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #107's diagnoses included but were not limited to: sepsis, osteomyelitis of vertebra sacral and sacrococcygeal region, pressure ulcer sacral region stage 4, pressure ulcer of right upper back stage 4, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side. Resident #107's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/26/19 was coded as an admission assessment. Resident #107 was coded as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate clinical record for one Resident (Resident #86) in a survey sample of 43 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #86 the facility staff documented administration of medication which had been left at the bedside and was not taken. Resident #86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #86's diagnoses included but were not limited to: Spinal Stenosis, Urinary tract infection, obstructive and reflux uropathy, degenerative disease of the nervous system, cirrhosis of liver, acute kidney failure, hemochromatosis, hydronephrosis, and muscle weakness. Resident #86's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/15/19 was coded as an admission assessment. Resident #86 was coded as having had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15, which indicated intact cognitive skills. Resident #86 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain shower equipment and the shower room in a sanitary manner to prevent the spread of infection in 1 of 4 shower rooms. The findings included: On 11/6/19 at approximately 2:18 PM during the group Resident Council meeting, it was shared that the shower room on the 2nd floor was dirty. The Resident council reported specifically that the floor drain was clogged and the shower bench was dirty and discolored. On 11/6/19 at 2:47 PM the bathing suite on the 2nd floor was observed and the following was noted: * the shower drain was obstructed with a gray matter covering 1/2 of the drain holes in the floor drain of the shower stall. * the shower bench back was observed and revealed heavy discoloration of pink and black substances throughout the entire back. On 11/6/19 at approximately 3:15 PM, Employee N, the housekeeping supervisor accompanied the surveyor to the 2nd floor bathing suite. When asked about the process for cleaning, the housekeeping supervisor stated, we do the toilet and floors,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2019-11-08 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, the facility staff failed to post and have readily accessible the results of the survey reports for the three preceding years, to include any plan of corrections. The facility only had two of the last three years available. In addition the facility did not have plans of corrections that were finalized for two of the three surveys that were available. The findings included: On 11/6/19 at approximately 3:00 PM, the survey binder was observed to be located on a table on the first floor as you enter the nursing facility through the lobby. The binder contained survey results from the following surveys: * May 2018 Standard Survey * June 2018 Life Safety Survey * March 2017 Standard Survey On 11/7/19 at 9:11 AM the survey binder was observed to contain the following surveys: * 5/22/18- 5/24/18 Emergency Preparedness Survey and Standard Survey which had a watermark that read POC [plan of correction] not final * 6/15/18 Life Safety Survey * 3/7/17-3/9/17 Standard Survey and Biennial State Licensure Survey report, which revealed the biennial state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.2-2.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH 3 of 5Charleston Healthcare CenterCharleston, WV

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OMG LS LEASING CO., LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2018
GROVES, DONNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
STOLTZ, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2018
WILHEIM, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2018
TISWELL MGT CO., LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
ELEBIARY, AHMEDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
MAURITZ, JONIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/21/2023
ODENTHAL, RICHARDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/25/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$808K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 10%Other / private 11%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $808K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$379per resident / day
operating cost
$11,524per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$384per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495211. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next