No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Belmont Healthcare Center

506 Riverview Road, Belmont, WV 26134 · For profit - Corporation · 68 certified beds · (304) 665-2065 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 20242 immediate-jeopardy citations$251,207 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $251,207 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-21)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (78%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
201 Lafayette St · (304) 684-2267 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
329 2nd St · (304) 684-3784 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Scwrfa road · +441495781650 · Call to confirm hours
Park
605 Cherry St · (304) 684-7525 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.1%14.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.4%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.6%7.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%4.4%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.4%15.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.4%27.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.3%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.6%22.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.6%13.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%79.4%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.0%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.3%11.3%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.2%CMS range 35.6–59.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 7.6–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified79.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.4–14.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.801.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.80
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
78.1%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 62.9 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 78% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-29)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-05-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from physical abuse. Multiple incidents took place in which Resident #2 was physically abusive to other residents in the facility. The facility failed to take necessary action to prevent further abuse. This created an immediate jeopardy sitaution for more than an isolated number of residents. Resident identifiers: #1,# 2, #3,# 4, #57. Facility census: 65. Findings included: a) On 05/20/24 at approximately 11:30 AM, a record review was conducted of a facility reported incident dated 03/15/24. During review, it was determined Resident #2 was witnessed by facility staff hitting another resident in the face during an argument in the hallway. The Licensed Social Worker confirmed in the report that Resident #2 was trying to move Resident #3's wheelchair and an argument started. Two nurse aides witnessed Resident #2 strike Resident #3 in the face. The residents were then separated and redirected.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-21 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the psychosocial wellbeing of a resident was met following a traumatic event, due to failing to follow up with Resident #1 to assess her psychosocial wellbeing and make necessary referrals for Resident #1 to maintain her psychosocial wellbeing. Multiple incidents took place in which Resident #2 was physically abusive to other residents in the facility. The facility failed to take necessary action to prevent further abuse. This created an immediate jeopardy situation. Resident identifiers: #1,and #2. Facility census: 65 Findings included: a) Resident #1 On 05/20/24 at approximately 11:30 am, a record review was conducted of a facility reported incident dated 03/28/24. During review it was determined Resident #2 entered Resident #1's room between 9:30 PM and 10:00 PM. Resident #2 told Resident #1 she was going to, leave my house one way or another. Resident #2 then proceeded to place a blanket over Resident #1's face and attempted to smother her. Resident #2 then grabbed a towel, stating, If that's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident facility record review, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice. A resident's oxygen concentrator was set at a lower liter than ordered. This was a random opportunity for discover identified during a complaint survey. Resident identifier: #66. Facility census: 65. Findings included: a) Resident #66 On 05/20/24 at approximately 7:00 PM during a record review of the facility reported incident involving the allegation of neglect on 04/12/24 for Resident #66, it was identified that the daughter of Resident #66 found the resident lying flat in bed, lethargic and difficult to arouse. It further stated he was ordered 6L (six liters) of continuous oxygen but was only on 3L (three liters) and the facility had a 5L (5 liter) concentrator at his bedside and a 10L (ten liter) concentrator was required to supply the 6L as ordered. On 05/20/24 at approximately 7:30 PM during a record review of the facility investigation and supportive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional food safety standards. Additionally, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation practices for food preparation equipment. This practice had the potential to affect all residents. Facility census: 60.Findings include: a) Healthcare Services Group (HCSG) policy #28 titled Environment states: All food preparation areas, food service areas, and the dining areas will be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition.The Dining Services Director will ensure that all employees are knowledgeable in the proper procedures for cleaning and sanitizing all of the food service equipment and surfaces.The Dining Services Director will ensure that a routine cleaning schedule is in place for all the cooking equipment, food storage areas, and surfaces.b) HCSG policy #19 titled Food Storage: Cold Foods states:All Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) foods, frozen and refrigerated, will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the FDA Food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional food safety standards. Additionally, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation practices for food preparation equipment. This practice had the potential to affect all residents. Facility census: 60.Findings include:a) Healthcare Services Group (HCSG) policy #28 titled Environment, states:All trash will be contained in a covered, leak proof containers that prevent cross contamination.b) HCSG Policy #30, titled Dispose of Garbage and Refuse, states: The Dining Services Director will ensure that appropriate lids are provided for all containers.On 04/27/26 at 11:06 AM this surveyor completed an initial walkthrough of the kitchen with the Director of Dining Services (DDS). There was no lid on the trash can beside the juice machine. The DDS verified this deficient practice and placed a lid on the container. There was also no lid on the trash can in the dish room. The DDS verified this deficient practice and stated, We do not have a lid for this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-29 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on Resident Council, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide residents with the right to send and receive mail on Saturdays. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Residents identified: #55, #20, #10, #33, #50, #39, #22, #45, #24 and #30. Facility census: 60.Findings include: a) Resident Council During the Resident council meeting on 04/28/26 at 3:30 PM The residents stated that they do not receive their mail delivery on Saturdays. During an interview on 04/29/26 at 9:00 AM the Activity Director verified, The residents do not receive mail on Saturdays. On 04/29/26 at 9:25 AM the Administrator stated that the manager on duty will get the mail and deliver it to the residents from now on.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of a facility reported incident (FRI) and staff interviews, the facility failed to use the investigation results to determine the appropriate action regarding sexual abuse. This was true for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for abuse during the Long-Term Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #56 and #67. Facility census: 60.a) Resident #67 A review of the facility reportables found a sexual abuse allegation, dated 03/17/26, which involved Resident #67 reporting, Someone tried to rape me last night. She reported she was lying in bed asleep when she felt Resident #32 pulling on her leg. Resident #67 reported she wasn't sure what the man was doing, but she thought he was going to try to rape her. Employee #78 reported she was charting when she heard Resident #67 yelling. She reported that she and another Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) went to check on Resident #67, and Resident #32 was standing in Resident #67's room naked. Employee #78 reported that she asked Resident #67 if she was okay and Resident #67 said, Yes, just get his naked ass out of here. Employee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was as free from accident hazards as possible. This was a random opportunity to discover a blender storage area and medication carts unlocked and unattended. Facility Census: 60.Findings included: a) Resident #47 CommuniCare policy titled Medication Administration states: Never leave medication unattended. Remain with resident until the medication is swallowed. Do not leave medication at bedside. On 04/27/26 at 2:55 PM this surveyor interviewed Resident #47 while he was lying in his bed. This surveyor noticed a medicine cup on the bedside table. Resident #47 stated it was milk of magnesia. On 04/27/26 at 3:08 PM the surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON) to enter Resident #47's room to ask him what the medicine was, and if it was allowed to be left unattended. He stated it is milk of magnesia, and I will asked the nurse if Resident #47 asked her to leave it. On 04/27/26 at 11:30 AM, An observation of an unlocked, unattended medication cart on the 400 Hall. The cart was in a place easily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on food tray temperatures, resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to serve food that was attractive, palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature to prevent foodborne illness. Residents identified: #47, #33, #42 and #9. Facility census: 60 On 4/28/26 12:00 PM it was noted that the kitchen staff were not taking and recording temperatures for items on the always available menu. Before the surveyor brought it to the Director of Dining Services' (DDS) attention, the beef patties, hotdogs and brown gravy lacked recorded temperatures prior to the start of the lunch meal service. The DDS acknowledged they had not been taking and recording these food items' temperatures and will educate the staff to start doing so as soon as possible. The DDS stated, The always available menu item temperatures are not being recorded. I will start educating staff today, and we will start recording the temperatures of all food items.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record reviews, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention program to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases related to hand hygiene.This practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 60. Findings included:a) Hall Meal PassAn observation on 04/27/26 12:20 PM revealed that the Resident's in rooms on the 400 hall, did not receive hand hygiene prior to or during the noon meal pass. During an observation of the meal pass on the 200 and 400 halls on April 28, 2026, at approximately 12:55 PM, staff placed hand wipes on the meal trays. However, staff did not assist residents with physical limitations in using the wipes, nor did they inform other residents that the wipes were available on their trays.During an interview,on 04/28/23 at 1:50 PM, Nurse Aide (NA) 49 was asked if residents on the 100 hall received hand washing or sanitizing prior to the lunch meal that day. She verified that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of resident records, as evidenced by leaving a medicine cart's computer screen unlocked with resident information on display. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 60. Findings include:a) On 04/29/26 at 12:37 PM, this surveyor noticed that the medicine cart labeled blue cart, had the computer screen on, displaying residents' personal information.At 12:38 PM on 04/29/26, this surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON) if the computer screen is allowed to be on with no employee around, and he stated nope and locked the computer screen.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and resident interviews, the facility failed to assist dependent Residents with activities of daily living (ADL's) in accordance with their assessed needs for care. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for ADL care. Resident Identifier: #26. Facility census: 60. Findings Included:a) Resident # 26During an interview and observation conducted on 04/27/26 at 11:28 AM, the surveyor met with Resident #26, who had visible facial hair.The resident stated that her preference was to receive assistance with shaving; however, she noted that she does not always receive this help. During an Interview on 04/27/26 at 1:08 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) verified that Resident #26 had visible facial hair and that he would have staff assist her with getting shaved.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed in regards to completing neurological assessments following a fall. This was true for one (1) of 25 residents reviewed during the long term are survey process. Resident Identifier: Resident #13. Facility Census: 60. Findings included: a) Resident #13 A review of Resident #13's medical records found the resident suffered a fall on 07/08/24, 09/20/24, and 10/19/24. After each fall neurological assessments were indicated and initiated. However, these neurological assessments were not completed as required. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/23/24 at 1:05 PM, she acknowledged the neurological assessments were incomplete after the falls dated 07/08/2024, 09/20/2024, and 10/19/2024 .

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a safe and sanitary manner by not removing dented cans from service. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 60. Findings include: A) Dented cans At approximately 11:50 AM on 10/21/24, during a tour of the kitchen, three (3) dented cans were placed on the shelf alongside cans intended for service. Two (2) cans contained corn and one (1) can contained sliced peaches. At approximately 11:53 AM on 10/21/24, Culinary Aide (CA) #38, stated they were the cook for the day due to the Dietary Manager (DM) being out of the facility, and acknowledged the dents in the cans, and they should have been removed from the shelves with the other cans meant for service.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain effective infection control practices in the laundry room. Additionally, facility staff failed to adhere to infection control policies and protocols while providing catheter care. Resident Identifier: #44. Facility Census: 60. Findings included: a) Laundry Room During an inspection of the laundry room with Executive Director (ED) #6 on 10/22/24, at approximately 3:55 PM, discarded mop heads with a brown substance on them, were observed in the laundry sink. Additionally, several towels with brown stains were observed on top of a bin near the sink. Multiple covered, empty bins, for storing soiled items were available and lined up against the opposite wall. ED #6 confirmed soiled items should not be in the sink, or on top of the bins. The presence of uncovered soiled items increases the risk of contamination for all items in the laundry room. b) Resident #44 Catheter care for Resident #44 was observed on 10/23/24 at approximately 1:12 PM. This surveyor had requested Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #9's presence during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a correct capacity form for Resident #23 and failed to correctly document dates and times of neurochecks for Resident #13. Resident identifiers: #23 and #13. Census: 60 Findings included: a) Resident #23 A review of Resident #23's records on 10/21/24 at 7:18 PM revealed the following: Physician's Determination of Capacity Form dated 06/05/24 documented the resident did not have capacity to make his own medical decisions with duration being long term due to inability to process information and disorientation caused by a cerebral vascular accident. Physician's Determination of Capacity Form dated 8/30/24 expressed the resident had capacity to make his own medical decisions and was signed by only one physician. During an interview with the Administrator on 10/22/24 at 12:05 PM she acknowledged her understanding in order to restore capacity to a resident who has been deemed incapacitated you must have 2 (two) physician's signatures. She acknowledged, there was only one signature for Resident #23 to restore…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents had a means of contacting their caregivers through a call system that was accessible to them while in their bed, or other sleeping accommodations within their room. Resident Identifiers: #46 and #38. Facility Census: 60. Findings included: a) Resident #46 During an interview with Resident #46 on 10/21/24 at approximately 1:51 PM, the resident stated she needed to speak to a staff member. She looked around and was unable to locate her call light. Resident then stated, I'll wait for someone to come. Upon being notified the resident needed help, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #51 arrived and confirmed the call light was on the floor below the resident's bed, and inaccessible to the resident. LPN #51 confirmed that the call light was out of the reach of the resident and stated, Well that is a problem! LPN #51 then retrieved the call light and placed it next to the resident, and attended to the resident's needs. b) Resident #38 An observation of Resident #38 on 10/21/24 at 1:45 pm, found the reisdents call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that ensured investigations into allegations of abuse and neglect were thoroughly investigated. This failed practice was true for 1 (one) of 6 (six) investigations reviewed. Resident identifiers: #64. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #64 On 05/20/24 at 11:30 AM a review of the facility reported incident dated 04/01/24 was performed. It was noted that on 04/01/24 at approximately 12:00 PM, Resident #64 was in the facility dining room, she requested to be taken back to her room stating she needed to have a bowel movement. Employee #56 reports that she took Resident #64 down the hall to Employee #70. Employee #56 informed Employee #70 that Resident #64 wanted to be put in bed and placed on the bed pan to have a bowel movement. Employee #56 states that Employee #70 stated she would get her. Employee #56 reports that she also informed Employee #71 and that Employee #71 also stated she would get her. At approximately 01:30 PM, Employees #57 and #42 went into give…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and the facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to provide evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and that corrective action was taken. Witness statements and staff education was not thoroughly completed. This was true for one (1) of five (5) facility reported incidents reviewed during the complaint survey. Resident identifier: #64. Census: 65. a) Resident #64 On 05/20/24 at 11:30 AM a review of the FRI complaint and investigation was performed. It was noted that on 04/01/24 at approximately 12:00 PM, Resident #64 was in the facility dining room, she requested to be taken back to her room stating she needed to have a bowel movement. Employee #56 reported she took Resident #64 down the hall to Employee #70. Employee #56 informed Employee #70 that Resident #64 wanted to be put in bed and placed on the bed pan to have a bowel movement. Employee #56 stated that Employee #70 said she would get her. Employee #56 reports that she also informed Employee #71 that Employee #70 also stated she would get her. At…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to implement written Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) polices and procedures for data collection and monitoring including adverse event monitoring. This failed practice was true for 6 (six) of 6 (six) investigations reviewed. Resident identifiers: Resident #64, #66. Facility census: 65. Findings included: a) Resident #64 On 05/20/24 at approximately 08:37 PM, a review of the facility policy, [NAME] Virginia Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation Policy was performed noting the following text on page 19: All investigations of abuse, neglect and misappropriation will be reviewed by the QAPI committee. The committee will determine if the investigation is complete and if the action taken has resolved the issue or if a performance improvement plan is needed. On 05/21/24 at approximately 12:00 PM, a review of the facility policy, QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) Plan was performed noting the following text on page 5 (five). ii. The facility will track, investigate and monitor adverse events…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise care plans for one (1) of six (6) residents. Resident #64's care plan was not revised to reflect the resident's ability to use the FreeStyle Libre blood glucose monitoring system. Resident #2's care plan was not revised to reflect her aggression toward other residents. Resident identifiers: #64, #2. Facility census: 65. Findings included: a) Resident #64 On 05/20/24 at 2:23 PM an interview with Resident #64 was conducted. While in Resident #64's room, a beeping sound was noted, a small machine was noted to be on her bedside table, upon observation it was noted to be a FreeStyleLibre blood glucose monitor. The Surveyor questioned Resident #64 about this, she responded, I don't even know where they have that thing on me. The Surveyor told Resident #64 she would get her nurse to help her with it. On 05/20/24 at 2:27 PM Employee #89 was walking down the hallway. The Surveyor asked him if he was Resident #64's nurse, to which he responded, Yes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0680 — isolated
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional who is a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who is licensed. This was identified during the extended survey process of the complaint survey. This has the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Identifier: Recreational Director (RD) #60. Census: 65. Findings included: a) On 05/21/24 at approximately 2:30 PM a request to review the Recreational Director (RD) #60's license. This request was made during the facility extended survey process. RD #60 stated she was not yet licensed but was currently in class to obtain her license through the National Certification Council for Activity Professionals. She stated the program had a practicum, and that the Administrator was her preceptor. She further stated that no one was overseeing her work or signing off on it. Record review for the activity preference for Resident #2 revealed it was completed and signed off by RD #60. During an interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records as it pertained to behavior monitoring for Resident #1. Resident identifier: 2. Facility census: 65. Findings include: A) Record Review On 05/20/24 at approximately 12:30 PM a review of progress notes for Resident #2 were reviewed as they pertained to behaviors exhibited by Resident #1. The following progress note from 04/20/24 typed as written: 04/20/24 at 3:32 AM - Resident up/out of room, yelling at CNA, cursing. Aggressive behavior. Started to enter another resident's room with this nurse intervening and redirecting back to room. Very irritable and anxious. Asking 'Where's Steve? What the hell are you all doing in my house?' Redirected, reassured resident. Assisted resident back to bed, offered food and fluids. Calmed. Currently lying quietly in bed with 1-1 supervision continued. At approximately 10:00 AM on 05/21/24 a review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and behavior monitoring task sheet for Resident #1 was reviewed. According to the MAR and behavior monitoring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the patient care equipment was in safe operating condition. A concentrator was identified to have overheated and not working for a resident. This was true of one (1) of three (3) residents with oxygen concentrators in use and was identified during the complaint survey. This had the ability to affect a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #34. Facility census: 65. Findings included: a) On 05/21/24 at approximately 11:15 AM during a medical record review of Resident #34, the resident's oxygen order and care plan identified the oxygen level of 3L (three Liters). An observation of the concentrator in use for Resident #34 was completed at approximately 11:22 AM on 05/21/24. During this time, it was identified that the concentrator oxygen level was at 2. During an interview with the Licensed Practical Nurse #95 she acknowledged the concentrator was reading 2L (two Liters) and that it should be at 3L. She began adjusting the dial, but the concentrator would not adjust up or down with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-19 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to accurately complete comprehensive assessments reflecting Hospice services and anticoagulants. This is true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for Hospice and two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for inaccurate assessments. Resident identifiers: #38, #44 and #46. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Resident #38 1. Hospice A review of the medical record revealed Resident (R) #38 was on Hospice services for end of life care. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/09/22 was incorrectly coded as no under section J1400. The Resident Assessment Instruction Manual states: Code 1, yes: if the medical record includes physician documentation: 1) that the resident is terminally ill; or 2) the resident is receiving hospice services. During an interview on 10/19/22 at 12:45 PM, RN MDS Coordinator #65 confirmed R#38's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] was incorrectly coded under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on deficiencies cited, resident interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff were available at all times to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promoted resident rights, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Facility census: 61. Findings Included: a) Citations During the facility's long-term care survey the following citations are cross referenced for F725: -See F550 Resident Rights / Exercise of Rights -See F0641 Accuracy of Assessments -See F0677 ADL Care Provided for Dependent Residents -See F0693 Tube Feeding Management -See F0695 Respiratory Care -See F0761 Label / Store Drugs and Biologicals -See F842 Accurate Medical Record -See F0880 Infection Prevention and Control b) Resident Interviews During an interview on 10/17/22 at 12:02 PM, Resident #12 stated, At times they get short, they have call offs, and care is late at times. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals, used in the facility, were stored and administered in accordance with current accepted professional practices to ensure the safety and efficacy of medications administered. Medications stored in one (1) of two (2) medication carts inspected, had medication that was being administered after the manufacturer use by date. Temperatures were not obtained for the medication room refrigerator to ensure proper storage of medications requiring refrigeration. This practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: Resident #1. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Medication cart An observation of the Blue Hall medication cart , on 10/18/22 at 08:49 AM, revealed a Humalog insulin quick pen for Resident #1. Further observation revealed the insulin pen had a date of 09/17/22 written on the outside of the pen. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 26, on 10/18/22 at 09:07 AM, verified the date of 09/17/22 was the date the Humalog Insulin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at an accurate temperature. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census 61. Findings Included: A review of the facility policy entitled HCSG 016 Food: Preparation with an effective date of 05/2014 and revision date of 09/2017 stated: .13. All foods will be held at appropriate temperatures, greater than 135 degrees F (Fahrenheit) (or as state regulation requires) for hot holding, and less than 41 degrees F for cold food holding . a) Tray Line On 10/18/22 at 11:25 AM, Food Services Director #56 obtained temperatures from the tray line prior to the meal service. The following foods did meet the temperature guidelines: --puree corn 96.0 degrees F --cottage cheese 45.3 degrees F --shredded cheese 44.7 degrees F During an interview on 10/18/22 at 11:55 AM, the Food Services Director #56 confirmed the temperatures were incorrect. We will get this corrected immediately. b) Lunch Tray Temperature On 10/18/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to label and date food items that were opened. The facility also failed to accrue dishwasher, refrigerator, freezer and resident refrigerator temperature logs. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents who are served food from the kitchen. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Kitchen Tour On the initial tour of the kitchen on 10/17/22 at 10:45 AM, the following food was found in the walk-in refrigerator in a Ziploc baggies with the date but were not labeled: --Angel Food Cake --American [NAME] Cheese Also, on 10/17/22 10:49 AM, the following food was found in the walk-in refrigerator labeled but not dated: --An opened bag of hash browns --An open bag of ravioli --An open bag of chicken tenders. The Food Services Director #56 confirmed the above items should have been labeled and dated once they were opened. b) Resident Pantry A review of the facility policy titled Use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for one three (3) of 20 sample residents reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey process. Resident identifiers: #48, #111, and #20. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Resident #48 An electronic medical record review, completed on 10/17/22 at 1:38 PM, revealed the following details: -A hospice discharge form, dated 09/02/22, providing resident/resident's representative a notice of non-coverage and stating that hospice services were ending. -A Physician Order for Scope of Treatment (POST) Form was on file. The second page of the POST form noted, Patient is enrolled in hospice. During an interview, on 10/18/22 at 2:05 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) acknowledged the POST form was not accurate and needed updated. b) Resident #20 An electronic medical record review, completed on 10/18/22 at 9:22 PM, revealed the following physician order: Every day and evening shift, check for residual q shift [every shift] and note any amount in ml (milliliters). If residual is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care was provided in a manner to promote the resident's dignity. A sign was posted in Resident #46's room noting direction for care or treatment. This failed practice was based on a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to effect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: Resident #46. Facility census: 61 Findings included: a) Resident #46 An observation, on 10/17/22 at 11:45 AM, revealed a sign posted on the wall, above the resident's chair in Resident #46's room. The sign read as follows: When (Resident #46) is in chair do not let her have the remote. She will put herself on the floor. Put her in her chair and hide the remote. An interview, with Registered Nurse (RN) #65, on 10/17/22 at 11:48 AM, verified no sign should be above the resident's chair, showing resident information and stated it should be removed .

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive assessment for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for Hospice. Resident identifiers: #38 and #44. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Resident #38 Review of the medical revealed Resident (R) #38 is on Hospice services for end of life care. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/09/22 is incorrectly coded as no under section J1400. The Resident Assessment Instruction Manual states: Code 1, yes: if the medical record includes physician documentation: 1) that the resident is terminally ill; or 2) the resident is receiving hospice services. During an interview on 10/19/22 at 12:45 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) MDS Coordinator #65 confirmed R#38's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] was incorrectly coded under section J1400. b) Resident #44 On 10/19/22 at 10:00 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #44. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received necessary services in the areas of dressing and personal hygiene. This was true for nine (9) of 20 residents reviewed under the care area of activities of daily living during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #1, #47, #31, #112, #28, #27, #22 and #8. Facility census: 61. a) Resident #1 On 10/18/22 at 8:55 AM, an interview with Resident #1 was completed. Resident #1 stated I'm supposed to get my showers Monday, Wednesday and Fridays .There was a new girl and she didn't know anything about it. She said we don't give showers on evening shift anymore. On 10/18/22 at 3:24 PM, an interview with the Administrator regarding the shower schedule was held. The Administrator stated, they can have showers whenever they request them .we do showers on evening shift .here is a copy of the new shower schedule .we will go talk to her and if she wants a shower she can have one. A review of the new shower schedule dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to promote healing of pressure ulcer. This failed practice was true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. Resident identifier: #55. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Resident #55 A record review, completed on 10/18/22 at 7:54 PM, found the following physician order, Cleanse right heel unstageable pressure ulcer with wound cleanser. Apply Silver Hydrogel to wound bed, no sting skin prep to peri wound. Cover with dry dressing. Change qd [every day]. Every day shift for Wound Care. Diabetic Ulcer. The physician order had a start date of 10/02/2022. Review of the October 2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following dates that were left blank: -10/15/22 -10/17/22 -10/18/22 During an interview, on 10/19/22 at 8:45 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the three (3) above dates on the October 2022 MAR were left blank and undocumented. The DON further stated all nurses are trained to document accurately in the MAR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to restore, if possible, oral eating skills and prevent complications of enteral feeding. The facilty failed to ensure the residual amounts were obtained in accordance with the physician's orders. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed who was receiving a tube feeding during the Long Term Care Survey Process. (LTCSP). Resident identifier: #111. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Resident #111 A record review, for Resident #111, showed a physician's order, dated 10/16/22, for staff to check for residual daily , every shift, before reconnection of the tube feed and note any amount in milliliters (ml). If the residual was greater than 100 ml, staff were to hold the feeding for one (1) hour and recheck. If residual remained greater than 100 ml , the staff were to notify the physician. Further record review, showed no evidence the residual was being checked every day, during every shift, in order to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy in accordance with professional standards and practices. The facility failed to ensure the flow rate of oxygen was administered in accordance with physician's orders. This failed practice was true for one (1) of two (2) residents receiving oxygen therapy, reviewed during the Long Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifier: Resident #111. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Resident #111 A record review for Resident #111, showed a physician's order, dated 10/16/2022, for the resident to receive oxygen therapy at a flow rate of two (2) liters per minute (L/min), related to a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. An observation, on 10/17/22 at 12:50 PM, revealed the oxygen was being administered to Resident #111 at a rate of 1.5 L/min. An interview, with Registered Nurse (RN) #65, on 10/17/22 at 12:53 PM, confirmed Resident #111 was receiving oxygen at 1.5 L/min and verified the oxygen was not being administered in accordance with physician's orders. RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep waste properly contained when the dumpster was overfilled and uncovered. This failure had the potential to result in unpleasant odors and harboring of pests. Facility census: 61. Findings included: A review of the food code by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), dated 2017, section 5-501.113 indicated outside receptacles must have tight-fitting lids or covers. a) Dumpster During an observation on 10/17/22 at 10:35 AM, the dumpster was overfilled. Garbage bags were observed approximately 12 inches above the top edge of the dumpster. The lid was flipped behind the dumpster. During an interview with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) on 10/17/22 at 10:37 AM, the DSS acknowledged the dumpster was overflowing and the lid was not closed. He went on to state, All staff use this dumpster for disposal of garbage. I will also address this with the Director of Housekeeping. .

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$251,207 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $251,207 — penalty dated 2024-05-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH 3 of 5Charleston Healthcare CenterCharleston, WV

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GROVES, DONNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2023
STOLTZ, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2022
WILHEIM, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2022
RIVERVIEW MGT CO., LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022
BROOKS, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022
MONTGOMERY, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022
ODENTHAL, RICHARDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/31/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$913K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 5%Other / private 14%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $913K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$414per resident / day
operating cost
$12,573per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$458per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515191. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next