Valley View Healthcare Center
333 W Mishawaka Rd, Elkhart, IN 46517 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 94 certified beds · (574) 293-1550 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $284,560 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-09)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 39% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.7% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.2% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.8% | 25.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.9% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.4% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.6% | 23.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.2% | 23.3% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.2% | 13.6% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 56.2% | 79.0% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 77.1 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to transcribe and implement physician ordered hydration, nutrition and medications for a newly admitted resident. This practice resulted in the resident being hospitalized with a hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (a critical, often fatal, complication from type 2 diabetes defined by severe hyperglycemia [high blood sugar] and extreme dehydration) that included a blood sugar level of 954 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) and extreme hypovolemic depletion (loss of extracellular fluid such as blood/salt/water) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident B) This practice had the potential to affect all newly admitted residents. The immediate jeopardy began on 1/4/26 when the facility failed to record and implement admission orders for critical medications and nutrition/hydration. The Administrator, Director of Nursing and Regional Director of Clinical Services were notified of the immediate jeopardy on 2/6/2026 at 12:00 P.M. The Immediate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-02-09 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain physician ordered laboratory tests, including a urinalysis for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for laboratory service. (Resident C) This deficient practice resulted in a required hospitalization for uremic encephalopathy, hyperkalemia, acute kidney injury and acute hypoxic respiratory failure with pneumonia. Finding includes:The record review for Resident C was completed on 2/4/2026 at 1:19 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus type 2, atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/28/2025, indicated Resident C was cognitively intact, required substantial assistance for toileting hygiene and had an indwelling urinary catheter.A Physician's Order, dated 12/16/2025, indicated the supplement potassium chloride crystals extended-release tablet 20 milliequivalents one tablet daily was to be given for hypokalemia. This order decreased the previous order of two tablets dailyA Nursing Progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to follow the orders to discontinue an ordered anticoagulant for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident B) Findings include: A record review was completed for Resident B on 5/28/2026 at 2:29 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side and left non-dominant side and essential hypertension. A Discharge with Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/19/2026, indicated Resident B's cognition was intact and he took an anticoagulant and antiplatelet. Physician Orders for Resident B included, but were not limited to: -12/17/2026 Eliquis 5 milligrams (mg) 1 by mouth two times a day for blood thinner. On 2/24/2026 Resident B had a visit with his cardiologist. Documents sent back to the facility after the visit included an order, written on a prescription form, to discontinue the Eliquis on 3/26/2026. However, the medication was not discontinued until 4/24/2026. During an interview on 6/2/2026 at 2:10 P.M., the Regional Risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0659 — isolatedProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff who participated in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were current in their CPR training and certification for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, (Resident E). Finding includes: Resident E's clinical record was reviewed on [DATE] at 10:00 A.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to pericardial effusion (fluid around the heart), breast cancer, heart valve insufficiency, and hypertension. A nursing progress note dated [DATE] at 1:13 P.M., indicated Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)11 and CNA 12 went to Resident E's room to provide care and noted the resident had increased difficulty breathing so the CNAs notified the nurse. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1, indicated upon arrival and initial assessment the resident was unresponsive, without a pulse and respirations. She began CPR, and Emergency Services was called. An untitled document dated [DATE] at 1:20 P.M., was provided by the Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and serve food in a sanitary manner in the pantries, dining rooms, and kitchen. This had the potential to affect 81 of 81 residents who consumed food from the kitchen, pantries and dining room. Findings include: 1. During the initial kitchen tour with dietary aide 2 on 3/23/2025 at from 10:00 A.M. - 10:30 A.M., the following was observed: -the reach-in freezer had an unsealed and undated bag of [NAME] fish and potato patties, unsealed boxes of chicken patties, biscuits, cinnamon rolls, frozen cookie dough, pretzels, 2 boxes of dinner rolls, and an employee's bottle of water. - the refrigerator had opened unsealed bags of mozzarella cheese and parmesan cheese, an undated package of hot dogs, celery and an undated pan of broccoli/cauliflower mix. -the dry goods room had an undated package of elbow noodles, an open package of hamburger buns and an open container of powdered milk. During an interview at 10:10 A.M. the dietary aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification of a transfer/discharge to the resident or resident's representative for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents H, L and M) Findings include: 1. A record review was completed on 3/24/2025 at 10:14 A.M. for Resident H. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizophrenia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/29/2025, indicated Resident H's cognition was intact. A discharge order, dated 1/7/2025, indicated transfer resident to the hospital for severe symptoms that cannot be controlled otherwise. During an interview on 3/24/2025 at 1:18 P.M., Resident H indicated he was admitted to a psychiatric hospital on 1/7/2025 and did not receive written notification of the transfer/discharge. A Nurses Progress Note, dated 1/7/2025, indicated Resident H had alerted staff he was in danger of harming himself or others, had not slept in days and was talking to himself. He also made threatening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the facility's Bed Hold Policy to the resident or resident representative for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents H, L and M) Findings include: 1. A record review was completed on 3/24/2025 at 10:14 A.M. for Resident H. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizophrenia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/29/2025, indicated Resident H's cognition was intact. A discharge order, dated 1/7/2025, indicated transfer resident to the hospital for severe symptoms that cannot be controlled otherwise. During an interview on 3/24/2025 at 1:18 P.M., Resident H indicated he was admitted to a psychiatric hospital on 1/7/2025 and had not received a copy of the facility's Bed Hold Policy. A Nurses Progress Noted, dated 1/7/2025, indicated Resident H had alerted staff he was in danger of harming himself or others, had not slept in days and was talking to himself. He also made threatening gestures toward staff. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0694 — patternProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to change the dressings of residents who had a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line for 3 of 3 residents whose PICC lines were reviewed. (Residents B, D and C) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 3/24/2025 at 3:02 P.M., Resident B's PICC line dressing was dated, 3/14/2025 and was rolled up with the insertion site exposed. Resident B indicated the dressing had not been changed in over a week. During an interview on 3/24/2025 at 3:05 P.M., LPN 6 indicated the PICC line dressing should not be rolled up and the dressing should have been changed after seven days. Resident B's record review was completed on, 3/25/2025 at 8:30 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: subacute osteomyelitis of the left ankle and foot, Type 1 diabetes mellitus, methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, below-knee amputation of right leg. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/11/2025, indicated Resident B had intact cognition. A current Physician's order, dated 3/14/2025, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide medications to residents as ordered by the Physician for 4 of 6 residents whose medications were reviewed. In addition, the facility failed to appropriately store medications in 1 of 3 Medication Carts reviewed. (Residents F, N, O, C & 100 Hall Medication Cart ) Findings include: 1. Resident F's record review was complete on [DATE] at 10:10 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder, insomnia, history of myocardial infarction and major depressive disorder. A current Physician's order, dated [DATE], indicated Resident F was to receive the following mediations: - 0.4 milligram (mg)/hour transdermal nitroglycerin patch (treats chest pain) every morning. -20 mg of omeprazole (treats heartburn) every morning. A current Physician's order, dated [DATE], indicated Resident F was to receive 50 mg of trazodone (sleep aid) at bedtime. A [DATE] Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated Resident F had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of PICC (peripherally-inserted central catheter) dressing changes for 3 of 3 residents reviewed. (Residents C, D and B) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 3/24/2025 at 10:08 A.M., Resident C had a PICC line to his right upper arm with a dressing, dated 3/14/25, peeling up slightly at the very base. The clinical record of Resident C was reviewed on 3/26/2025 at 1:25 P.M. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: cerebral ischemia, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, morbid obesity, chronic kidney disease, systolic and diastolic congestive heart failure, venous insuffiency, chronic venous hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, ischemic cardiomyopathy, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, occlusion and stenosis of bilateral carotid arteries, ventral hernia, spinal stenosis and diabetes mellitus. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/19/2025, indicated Resident C was cognitively intact. The MDS assessment indicated the resident had been receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the standards of practice for infection control for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tracheostomy care (Resident 3), for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for PICC line care (Residents B and 76) and 2 residents observed for mediction administration. (Resident K and 13) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 3/24/2025 at 9:27 A.M. Resident 3's tracheostomy stoma dressing was dirty with yellowish/brown stains and was not dated. A record review was completed on 3/25/2025 09:53 A.M. for Resident 3. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and tracheostomy. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set MDS) assessment, dated 1/10/2025, indicated Resident 3's cognition was intact and received tracheostomy care. Physician Orders included, but were not limited to, an order on 3/13/2025 to cleanse the tracheostomy site with normal saline, pat dry, apply gauze and secure with tape until healed. A current Care Plan revised on 8/8/2024, indicated the tracheostomy was discontinued and care to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's choice of code status was documented consistently in the medical record for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for code status (Resident 70). Finding includes: During an interview, on [DATE] at 2:02 P.M., LPN 7 indicated Resident 70 was a full code. During an interview, on [DATE] at 10:00 A.M., the Social Service Designee (SSD) indicated Resident 70 was his own representative, had not been deemed incompetent and was capable of making his own legal decisions. The SSD indicated Resident 70 had reported to her he wanted to be a full code. The clinical record of Resident 70 was reviewed on [DATE] at 9:27 A.M. The resident's diagnoses included but were not limited to: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the dominant right side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular disease, hypertension, other reflux and obstructive uropathy, dysarthria, and dysphagia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure showers, hair care and/or nail care were provided for 2 of 6 residents. (Resident L- showers and hair care, Resident K- nail care) Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview, on 3/23/2025 at 1:51 P.M., Resident L indicated she could not recall the last shower she had been offered and had had bed baths only. She indicated the last bed bath she had received was given about a week ago. Resident L had a mass of hair that was matted. The matted hair was the size of a softball and was located at her back of her head. Resident L indicated she had only been offered disposable shower caps in regards to shampooing and does not remember the last time her hair was washed in a shower or was brushed. During an observation and interview, on 3/25/2025 at 9:14 A.M., Resident L indicated she still had not had a shower. The back of Resident L's hair still had a softball-sized hair matt present. During an interview, on 3/25/2025 at 11:10 A.M., CNA 9 indicated she had frequently offered her residents daily bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure freedom from verbal abuse for 2 of 8 residents reviewed (Resident F and Resident G). Findings include: 1) A complaint filed with the Indiana Department of Health, dated 1/13/25 indicated Resident G filed a grievance alleging Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5 had been rude and used foul language to Resident F during a medication pass. The report indicated Resident F asked LPN 5 to bring her some water to take her medication when the nurse entered the room with her pills. LPN 5 grabbed the pills from her bedside table and indicated Resident F should let her know when she wanted to take her pills. She indicated Resident F could not have a breathing treatment because her heart rate was too high. Resident F told LPN 5 her heart rate might not be so high if LPN 5 was not being a b. The complainant indicated LPN 5 closed the door, and then reopened it, put her head in the doorway, called Resident F a b and closed the door. The complainant indicated the Administrator rewrote the grievance, changing what…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an occurrence of verbal abuse was reported to the Department of Health for 1 of 8 residents reviewed (Resident F). Findings include: A complaint filed with the Indiana Department of Health, dated 1/13/25, indicated Resident G filed a grievance alleging Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5 had been rude and used foul language to Resident F during a medication pass. The report indicated Resident F asked LPN 5 to bring her some water to take her medication when she entered the room with her pills. LPN 5 grabbed the pills from the resident's bedside table and indicated Resident F should let her know when she wanted to take her pills. The nurse indicated Resident F could not have a breathing treatment because her heart rate was too high. Resident F told LPN 5 her heart rate might not be so high if LPN 5 was not being a b. The complainant indicated LPN 5 closed the door, then reopened it, put her head in the doorway, called Resident F a b and closed the door. The complainant indicated the Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal abuse was investigated for 2 of 8 residents reviewed (Resident F, Resident G). Findings include: 1) A complaint filed with the Indiana Department of Health indicated Resident G filed a grievance alleging Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5 had been rude and used foul language to Resident F during a medication pass. Resident F asked LPN 5 to bring her some water to take her medication when she entered the room with her pills. LPN 5 grabbed the pills from her bedside table and indicated Resident F should let her know when she wanted to take her pills. She indicated Resident F could not have a breathing treatment because her heart rate was too high. Resident F told LPN 5 her heart rate might not be so high if LPN 5 was not being a b. The complainant indicated LPN 5 closed the door, then reopened it, put her head in the doorway, called Resident F a b and closed the door. The complainant indicated the Administrator rewrote the grievance, changing what had been originally stated.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure assessment, education and care planning were accurately recorded pertaining to smoking for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident D). Findings include: A complaint addendum filed with the Department of Health, dated 1/16/25, indicated some residents had been smoking in their rooms the previous night. The complainant indicated the Administrator had told the nursing staff on duty not to document the indoor smoking in the residents' charts. The complainant also alleged the Administrator instructed the department heads and corporate staff present in the morning meeting the following day not to chart anything about the indoor smoking. During an observation, on 1/29/24 at 1:45 PM, Resident D was observed in the smoking area with a lit cigarette smoking An unidentified staff member was supervising several residents in the smoking area at the time. During an interview ,on 1/29/25 at 1:46 PM, Resident D indicated he smoked at the designated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food and maintain equipment in a sanitary manner related to foods not sealed tightly, mold in a refrigerator, cookware with chipped Teflon and a resident's personal water container with mold (Resident G). This deficient practice had the potential to affect 84 of 84 residents who received meals out of the kitchen. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 4/18/2024 at 11:32 A.M., Resident G indicated he had a plastic water container that he used to use, but the water from the bathroom where the staff would get the water from turned his straw black. Resident G indicated staff had never washed it. He had stopped them from using it and had a water pitcher staff would put ice in now. A plastic clear water jug with a plastic ringed straw sitting in the container was observed on the resident's night stand. The straw was noted to have black around the rings of the straw. A record review was completed on 4/23/2024 at 5:00 P.M. Resident G was cognitively intact. During an observation on 4/24/2024 at 9:57 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to develop comprehensive/person centered care plans for residents with behaviors and dementia care, for 6 of 23 residents whose care plans were reviewed. (Residents 66, 17, 77, 5, E & F) Findings include: 1. A record review was completed on 4/22/2024 at 10:27 A. M. Resident 66's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, depression anxiety, mood disorder and psychosis. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 3/18/2024, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. A current Care Plan, dated 3/27/2023, indicated the resident was at risk for Psychosocial well-being related to: Adjustment to new admission, Anxiety, Loss of Independence, dementia with behavioral disturbances, paranoia, auditory hallucinations, anxiety, and depression. A current Care Plan, dated 4/2/2023, indicated the resident had a behavior problem related to Psychosocial issues, dementia with behavioral disturbances, auditory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart was kept locked when unattended during a random observation of the medication cart. This had the potential to affect the 22 residents residing on the memory care unit. (400 Hall Medication Cart) Finding includes: During a random observation on 4/18/2024 at 11:10 A.M., the 400 hall medication cart on the memory care unit was unlocked with no staff in the vicinity. During an interview on 4/18/2024 at 11:12 A.M., LPN 14 indicated the cart should have been locked. On 4/24/2024 at 8:37 A.M., the Corporate Nurse provided the policy titled, Storage of Medications, dated 8/2020, and indicated the policy was the one currently used by the facility. The policy indicated .Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly . 2. Medication rooms, carts and medication supplies are locked when they are not attended by persons with authorized access 3.1-25(m)
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean and comfortable environment was maintained related to missing dresser drawer handles, a missing bathroom door knob, broken window blinds, and mold in a closet, as well as dirty microwaves, drawers, an oven, and cabinets/drawers for 2 of 4 halls observed. (200 & 400 halls) Findings include: An environmental tour was conducted on 4/24/2024 at 11:16 A.M. with the Maintenance Director, Administrator and the (AIT) Administrator in training. 1. The following was observed on the 400 hall: - room [ROOM NUMBER]: there was a broken window blind. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: the dresser was missing 8 handles. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: the bathroom door had no handle. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: there was a window blind setting on the floor and not covering the window. - The 400 unit dining room had 4 broken blinds, an oven that was not plugged in with dried food particles in the oven and the oven door had dried grease stains, and kitchenette…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident's Level One PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) assessment was completed accurately and failed to complete an updated Level 1 review. (Resident 66) Finding includes: A record review was completed on 4/18/2024. Resident 66 was admitted on [DATE]. The resident's March and April 2023 medication orders included the medication Quetiapine (antipsychotic) 50 mg (milligrams) 1 tablet by mouth nightly for psychosis. The Medication Administration Records (MARs), dated March and April 2023, indicated the resident had received the antipsychotic medication daily. A Preadmission Screening and Resident Review form, dated 4/7/2023, indicated Resident 66's diagnoses included major depressive disorder and dementia. There were no known mental health behaviors that affect interpersonal interactions. There were no known or suspected developmental conditions or diagnoses that affects intellectual and /or adaptive functioning. Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents requiring assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) receive adequate assistance with hair and nail care and bathing for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Residents E and M) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 4/18/2024 at 10:07 A.M. Resident E's hair was oily and she had long fingernails on both her hands. Resident E's finger nails were dirty on her right hand. An observation of Resident E was completed on 4/19/2024 at 9:45 A.M. Resident E's hair was oily and she had long fingernails on both her hands. Resident E's finger nails were dirty on her right hand. Resident E's record review was completed, on 4/22/2024 at 9:00 A.M. Resident E's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, mood disorder, anxiety disorder, cerebral vascular accident, contracture of left wrist and left hand, and contracture of muscle of left lower leg and left lower hand. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment , dated 2/17/2024, indicated Resident E…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain oxygen equipment in a sanitary manner related to a dirty air filter on an oxygen concentrator for 1 of 2 residents who were reviewed for the use of oxygen. (Resident 21) Finding includes: An observation of Resident 21 was completed on 4/17/2024 at 02:52 P.M. Resident 21 was wearing a nasal cannula connected to an oxygen concentrator. The oxygen concentrator's filter had a thick layer of dust. During an observation on 4/19/2024 at 1:30 P. M., Resident 21 was wearing a nasal cannula connected to an oxygen concentrator. The oxygen concentrator's filter had a thick layer of dust. During an observation of Resident on 4/22/2024 at 2:14 P.M., Resident 21 was wearing a nasal cannula connected to an oxygen concentrator. The oxygen concentrator's filter had a thick layer of dust. A record review for Resident 21 was completed on 4/22/2024 at 2:45 P.M. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to: chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess a resident upon return from dialysis procedures for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis. (Resident 34) Finding includes: A record review for Resident 34 was completed on 4/19/2024 at 2:08 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal dialysis and dependence on dialysis. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/26/2024, indicated Resident 34's cognition was intact and she received dialysis services. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: - 4/29/2022 Obtain pre-dialysis weight, and post dialysis weights on every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, related to end stage renal disease. - 8/25/2022 Dialysis Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at [name of] Dialysis Center. A Care Plan problem, initiated on 10/6/2020 and revised on 6/21/2023, indicated Resident 34 had end stage renal disease and required hemodialysis with the potential for complications. Interventions included, but were not limited to: -If the resident refuses to go to dialysis, provide education as to the risks of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with appropriate serving sizes for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pureed meals. Finding includes: During an observation of the dining room on 4/17/2024 at 12:55 P.M., there were four residents who received pureed meals. When the last resident received their meal, QMA 4 removed the lid of the bowl and there was approximately one tablespoon of green beans in the resident's bowl. During an interview, on 4/17/2024 at 12:56 P.M., QMA 4 indicated there was not ½ cup of pureed green beans in the bowl. During an interview on 4/17/2024 at 1:25 P.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) indicated the portion of green beans that was served was not a full serving of ½ cup. After telling the cook to remove what was in the bowl and then scoop out a full amount of the green beans, the DM indicated the amount did not meet the dietary requirements. On 4/18/2024 at 8:50 A.M., the Corporate Infection Prevention Nurse provided the pureed menu for week four, which indicated the lunch meal was for pureed cheese ravioli and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed when medications were not documented as administered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medications, (Resident B). Findings include: On 10/26/23 at 2:00 P.M., Resident B's clinical records were reviewed. Resident B's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 8/07/23, indicated Resident B was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. The resident was admitted to the facility following a right femoral-popliteal bypass surgery, and had diagnoses which included cardio-respiratory conditions, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, left leg above the knee amputation, and a diabetic ulcer to the right great toe. Review of Physician's Orders for medications and supplement to be administered, included the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was free of lime build up and dishes were stored to prevent cross contamination. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 83 of 83 residents. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 03/10/23 at 12:39 P.M., with the FSS there was an lime build up on the bottom of the dish rack and prongs on the inside of the dishwasher. The FSS indicated they de-lime the dishwasher every Friday after the last meal of the day. In addition, pots, pans and bowls were stored on the bottom shelf of the kitchen prep tables, in an upside down manner. He indicated the bowls pots and pan should not be located on the bottom rack because of the dirt and debris on the floor. During an observation, on 3/13/2023 at 2:15 P.M. the pots and bowls remained inverted on the bottom shelf and debris remained on the floor underneath the pots/pan and bowls. During an interview on 3/13/2023 at 2:45 P.M. the FSS provided the policy titled Environment dated 9/20/2017, and indicated the policy was the one currently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-14 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure mail was delivered to residents on Saturdays. (Residents 36, 39, 63 and 71) Finding includes: During the resident council/surveyor meeting, on 3/10/2023 at 2:00 P.M., 4 of 4 alert and oriented residents attending the meeting (Residents 36, 39, 63 and 71) indicated the resident mail was not delivered on Saturdays or Sundays. The residents indicated the mail, delivered to the facility, sat in a box in the front of the building. On 3/13/2023 at 9:03 A.M., on a Monday morning, a stack of mail with a large rubberband around it was observed on the receptionist's desk. During an interview with Employee 19, on 3/13/2023 at 9:04 A.M., she confirmed the stack of mail had been delivered on Saturday and no one sorted and delivered the mail to the residents on Saturdays. Employee 19 indicated the post office usually delivered the facility mail to the building around 5:00 P.M. and she sorted the mail the next weekday morning and placed any resident mail on a shelf in the copy room office. She indicated the Activity Director was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings, involving the resident and/or their representative, were completed when a comprehensive assessment and/or quarterly review of the assessment was completed. This deficient practice affected (Residents C, D, 13, 19 and 25) and the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised after a resident declined for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living declines. (Resident 70). Findings include: 1. The record for Resident C was reviewed on 3/7/2023 at 2:30 P.M. Resident C was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, including but were not limited to: hemiplegia and hemiparesis, epiilepsy and epileptic syndromes with seizures, asthma, obstructive sleep apnea, obesity, dysphagia, gastostomy, history of falling, difficulty walking, unsteadiness on feet, sleep disorder and muscle weakness. An admission MDS assessment was completed on 2/3/2023. During an interview with alert and oriented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received personal hygiene such as shaving and nail care for 5 of 8 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. (Residents 10, 13, 17, 27 & 56) Findings include: 1. The review for Resident 13 was reviewed on 3/7/2023 at 3:45 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Parkinson's, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, and post-traumatic stress disorder. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/14/2023, indicated he was totally dependent for bathing and extensive assist of one person for personal hygiene, extensive assist of two for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. During an observation and interview, on 3/6/2023 at 9:09 A M., Resident 13 was eating, raising a fork and had tremors, and was observed with facial hair that was more than a couple days of growth. He indicated that he could not get a shave, it was not offered. During an observation, on 3/7/2023 at 10:18 A.M., he was in his room bent over in his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of greater than 5% for 1 of 7 residents observed during medication pass. Two medication errors were observed during 25 opportunities. This resulted in a medication error rate of 8 percent. (Resident 20) Finding includes: The record for Resident 20 was reviewed on 3/10/2023 at 9:29 A.M. A Physician Order, dated 12/10/2021, included but were not limited to: Albuterol Sulfate HFA Aerosol Solution 90 MCG/ACT, 2 puffs inhale orally four times a day. A Physician Order, dated 12/11/2021, included, but were not limited to: Mometasone Furoate Aerosol Powder Breath Activated 220 MCG/INH, 1 puff orally two times a day for breathing treatment. During an observation on 3/8/2023 at 7:16 A.M., the Registered Nurse (RN) 9 handed Resident 20 the albuterol inhaler and the resident administered the medication per self. She gave herself a puff, then she was handed the other inhaler Mometasone Furoate. There was no wait time between the inhalation, only one puff of albuterol was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to place open dates on medication for 1 out of 2 carts reviewed for medication storage and labeling. This deficient practice affected 9 residents. (Residents 2, 8, 30, 36, 37, 55, 64, 69 and 74) Finding includes: The 100-hall medication cart had 7 bottles of opened nasal sprays and 3 inhalers without an open date on the packaging. There was a Symbacort inhaler for Resident 8, with delivery date of 3/1/2023 and no open date. There was an Albuterol inhaler for Resident 74, with a delivery date of 2/23/2023 and no open date. There was an Albuterol inhaler for Resident 30 with no open date There was a Flucotisone nasal spray for Resident 2 with a delivery date of 1/22/2023 and no open date. There was a Flucotison nasal spray for Resident 36 with a delivery date of 9/26/2022 and no open date. There was a Oxymerazoline nasal spray for Resident 69 with a delivery date of 3/3/2023 and no open date. There were two Fluticansone nasal sprays for Resident 55 with a delivery date of 12/10/2022 and 2/11/2023 and no open date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and interviews the facility failed to identify concerns with palatability and temperature of food served for the residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 83 of 83 residents. Findings include: During an observation of the meal service, conducted on 3/6/2023 at 11:56 A.M., an insulated meal cart was delivered to the main dining room. From 11:56 A.M. - 12:23 P.M., the cart's doors were wide open and staff were moving covered meal trays in and out of the cart in an attempt to locate meal trays for the residents who were waiting on meals in the dining room. At 12:23 P.M., all of the meal trays left were placed back into the cart, the doors of the cart were shut and the cart was delivered to the 300 hall. The cart was then moved to the 100 hall and finally the 200 hall before all of the meals were delivered, at 1:02 P.M. In addition, at 12:34 P.M. a second cart was delivered to the 300 unit and the process was repeated with the cart leaving the 300 unit and being delivered to the 100 unit. During an interview with alert and oriented Resident D,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering a transmission based precaution (TBP) room (Resident 81) and failed to ensure infection control practices were followed during medication administration and dressing change (Resident 20, 236 and 17). Findings include: 1. During the initial tour of the facility on 3/6/2023 from 9:45 A.M. - 11:15 A.M., Resident 81's door had signage indicating it was a Red Zone, instructing staff in PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) usage and indicated the resident was on Droplet precautions. Resident 81 was readmitted to the facility on with diagnoses, including but not limited to: acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia and human metapneumovirus. On 3/7/23 at 9:30 A.M., the Regional Nurse Consultant was observed to answer Resident 81's call light. She propped the door open and asked Resident 81 what she needed. After hearing the resident's response, the Administrative nurse then donned an N95 mask, a disposable gown and gloves. The nurse did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform a dressing change in a private area for 1 out of 1 reviewed for dignity. (Resident 17) Finding includes: The record for Resident 17 was reviewed on 3/7/2023 at 9:00 A.M. Diagnoses included, but not limited to: dementia without behavioral disturbances, psychotic disturbances, mood disturbances and anxiety disorder. A Physician Order, dated 3/1/2023 indicated staff were to apply skin prep to the left heel and cover the blister with a border gauze dressing daily, while the blister was intact. The order was discontinued on 3/8/2023 A Physician Order, dated 3/8/2023 indicated staff were to apply to a topical dressing to the left heel, once a day and apply skin prep daily. During an observation, on 3/7/2023 at 9:27 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) 9 removed Resident 17's left boot, sock and dressing in the common area with six resident's presents. She proceeded to clean the area, apply the treatment and cover with a dressing to a pressure ulcer. During an observation, on 3/8/2023 at 9:50 A.M., Registered Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-14 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a significant change assessment was completed after a significant decline in transfer, ambulation, bed mobility, toileting and bowel and bladder continency was noted for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) declines and bowel and bladder continency. (Resident 70) Finding includes: Resident 70 was observed, on 3/9/2023 continuously from 8:53 A.M. - 12:00 P.M. The resident was noted to sit herself up independently and feed herself when her meal tray was delivered. Nursing staff were observed administering medication, asking her about her personal hygiene supplies and trimming her nails but otherwise, no nursing care was observed for Resident 70. She was not observed to be assisted to toilet or to toilet herself. During an interview with CNA 22, on 3/10/2023 at 9:30 A.M., she indicated Resident 70 was independent for dressing, wore underwear and was continent and toileted herself. CNA 22 indicated the only help she gave Resident 70 was supervision and washing her back for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was initiated to address medications utilized for behaviors and insomnia for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication use. (Resident 70) Findings include: The record for Resident 70 was reviewed on 03/09/23 at 7:40 A.M. Resident 70 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis, including but not limited to: dementia with other behavioral disturbance, vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, single episode, insomnia, anxiety disorder and adult personality and behavior disorder. The current physician's orders for medications included the antipsychotic medication, Quetiapine Fumarate 50 mg in the morning for vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, the antiepileptic medication, Divalproex Sodium Oral Tablet Delayed Release 500 MG (Divalproex Sodium) Give 500 mg orally three times a day for Vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance and the antidepressant, TraZODone HCl Oral Tablet 50 MG (Trazodone HCl) Give 125 mg orally at bedtime for Insomnia. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-14 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a discharge care plan for 1 of 2 closed records reviewed for care plans. (Resident 75) Finding includes: The record for Resident 75 reviewed on 3/13/2023 at 2:10 P.M., indicated his diagnoses included, but not limited to: chronic kidney disease stage 3, atrial fibrillation, and type 2 diabetes. During an interview, on 3/13/2023 at 2:27 P.M., the Social Service Designee indicated when there was a new admission, she wrote a care plan for code status and for discharge planning. She indicated she had initiated a care plan for code status but did not initiated a care plan for his discharge. She confirmed the resident should have had a care plan implemented for discharge planning. On 3/13/2023 at 3:09 P.M., the Regional Nurse provided a policy titled, Plan of Care Overview, undated, and indicated the policy was the one currently used by the facility. The policy indicated . The purpose of the policy is to provide guidance to the facility to support the inclusion of the resident or resident representative in all aspects of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to identify and assess the use of an AFO (ankle foot orthosis) splint for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for splint use and range of motion issues. (Resident 3) Findings include: During an observation, on 3/6/2023 at 12:20 P.M., Resident 3 was sitting up in her wheelchair in the dining room wearing an AFO splint to her left lower leg. The record was reviewed on 3/6/2023 at 2:30 P.M. Diagnosis, included but were not limited to acquired deformity of left lower Alleghenies and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. and Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy. An order for the AFO splint had been discontinued 2/9/2019. During an observation, on 3/7/2023 at 10:00 A.M., the resident was sitting up in her wheelchair in her room wearing an AFO to her left lower leg. A care plan, dated 1/24/2023 indicated the resident was to wear a left AFO daily each shift when out of bed. During an observation and interview, on 3/8/2023 at 11:15 A.M., the resident was sitting up in her wheel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand splints were applied for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for limited range of motion. (Resident 27) Finding includes: The record for Resident 27 was reviewed on 3/8/2023 at 8:32 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: type 2 diabetes, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, and post- traumatic stress disorder. A Physician Order, dated 12/7/2022, indicated the facility was to apply a splint to the left hand before bed and remove the splint in the morning and/or if it becomes uncomfortable. A Care Plan, dated 12/7/2022, indicated the resident had hemiplegia related to a stroke, had a left lower extremity knee contracture and was to have a splint to the left hand. The left hand splint was to be applied at bedtime and removed in the morning. During a resident interview, on 3/6/2023 at 9:22 A.M., Resident 27 indicated he used to wear a splint to his left hand but they no longer put it on. No splint was visible in the room. During an observation, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent recurrent falls for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 13) and failed to ensure hot water temperatures were maintained at a safe level for 1 of 4 halls. Finding includes: 1. The record for Resident 13 was reviewed on 3/7/2023 at 3:45 P.M. Diagnoses included, but not limited to: Parkinson's, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation and post-traumatic stress disorder. The record indicated that he had a fall on 1/26/2023, 3/5/2023 and 3/12/2023. A Care Plan, dated 10/17/2020, and current, indicated the residennt was at risk for falls related to Parkinson's and muscle weakness. There was an intervention, dated 3/6/2023 to evaluate the resident for an urinary tract infection and labs. During a resident interview, on 3/6/2023 at 11:04 A.M., he indicated he rolled out of bed two days ago and they did not do anything to prevent it from happening again There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all respiratory equipment was available, labeled and dated at the bedside for immediate use. This deficient practice affected 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 3) Findings includes: During an observation and interview on 03/06/23 at 11:44 AM, Resident 3's tracheostomy site was clean and dry. There was no suction machine located in the resident's room. The resident indicated if she needed it, the staff would bring one to her. During an observation on 03/08/23 at 09:28 AM, Resident 3 was sitting up in her chair. There was no suction machine noted in her room. The record for Resident 3 was reviewed on 3/8/23 at 9:47 A.M. Diagnosis, included but were not limited to: Chronic Respiratory failure, Hypoxia or Hypercapnia. Physician's orders, dated 11/29/2023 included .suction canister and catheters in room at all times . During an interview, with the Regional nurse on 3/9/2023 at 2:45 P.M., she indicated they should have provided resident 3 with a suction machine. She indicated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-14 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to document and communicate behavioral triggers to prevent re-traumatization for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for post traumatic stress disorder. (Resident 45) Finding includes: Resident 45 was observed on 3/6/2023 at 11:00 A.M., seated in her wheelchair in her room. The resident was dressed in a hospital gown, had disheveled hair and was able to answer routine questions. There was a large pile of what looked like used and clean briefs, books, papers and hygiene items on he floor in her room. The record was reviewed on 3/7/2023 at 2:30 P.M. Resident 45 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, including but not limited to: adult failure to thrive, , low back pain, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, personality disorder, major depressive disorder and post traumatic stress disorder. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 1/18/2023, indicated displayed feeling down, depressed or hopeless, trouble falling and/or staying asleep, sleeping too much, feeling tired or having little energy, feeling bad…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring was documented in regards to multiple orders for antibiotic eye drops for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for antibiotic medications. (Resident C) Finding includes: Resident C was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, including but not limited to: hemiplegia and hemiparesis. During an interview with Resident C, on 3/6/2023 at 9:48 A.M., he indicated he had experienced a recent stroke that had affected his balance and his hearing on the left side and his eye on the left side. The resident was noted to be wearing prescription eye glasses and his left eye was not opening as far as his right eye. A physician's order, dated 2/17/2023 included the following antibiotic eye drop: Ciloxan Ophthalmic Solution 0.3 % (Ciprofloxacin HCl (Ophth)) Instill 1 drop in left eye every 4 hours for right eye redness for 7 Days A nursing progress note, dated 2/27/2023 at 5:00 P.M. indicated the following: Returned from Dr's appointment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure there were adequate indications and monitoring of use for psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 70) Finding includes: The record for Resident 70 was reviewed on 3/7/2023 at 2:50 P.M. Resident 70 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, including but not limited to: , dementia with other behavioral disturbance, vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, single episode, post traumatic stress disorder, insomnia, anxiety disorder, Adult personality and behavior disorder, , visual hallucinations, and cognitive communication deficit The current physician's orders for medication included the antipsychotic medication, Quetriapine Fumarate 50 mg orally in the morning and 100 mg at bedtime for vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance. In addition, the resident received the antiepileptic medication, Divalproex Sodium Oral Tablet Delayed Release 500 MG (Divalproex Sodium) 500 mg orally three times a day for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed 4 of 83 residents (Residents C, D, 8 and 54) and 3 of 4 residents who attended the resident council meeting. (Residents 36, 39 and 63) Finding includes: 1. During the observation and interview of the meal service, on 3/6/2023 at 11:56 A.M., alert and oriented Resident 8 indicated she was never served the right food per the menu. Observation of her meal tray and food ticket indicated she was supposed to be served Caprices vegetables and was served carrots. She was also supposed to be served pureed rice and was served mashed potatoes. 2. During an observation and interview with Resident 54, on 3/6/2023 at 12:45 P.M., indicated he had not received the correct food items. Review of his meal ticket indicated he was supposed to have received two hamburger patties with grilled onions and gravy, double portions of rice pilaf and Caprise vegetables. He was observed to have only received two plain hamburger patties with gravy, the rice was supposed to be rice pilaf but was just plain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-03-14 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written summary of the base line care plan to the resident and resident representative within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 2 newly admitted residents reviewed for base line care plans. (Resident 56) Finding includes: The record for Resident 56 was reviewed on 3/8/2023 at 9:05 A.M. Diagnoses included, but not limited to: benign prostatic hyperplasia, heart failure, and vascular dementia without behavioral disturbances. During an interview, on 3/8/2023 at 9:42 A.M., the Social Worker indicated that they did not provide the resident or residents representative a copy of the plan of care nor any documentation in the progress notes of one given and should have provided one. On 3/8/2023 at 10:12 A.M., the Regional Nurse provided a policy titled, Baseline/Care Plan/48 Hour Care plan, undated, and indicated the policy was the one currently used by the facility. The policy indicated .b. The facility will provide a copy of the baseline care summary to the resident and/or resident representative. c. There must be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$284,560 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $284,560 — penalty dated 2026-02-09
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.2 | -2.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/2014 |
| BOND, MARIA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| CLARK, TIMOTHY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2014 |
| DAUGHERTY, JOSHUA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| FELKER, DEAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2014 |
| JOYNER, SARA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| WILLARD, LACEY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2022 |
| WILSON, ROY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2014 |
| LONG, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/14/2018 |
| MISHAWAKA MGT CO LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2017 |
| ODENTHAL, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2017 |
| SHIRLEY, OLIVIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/06/2023 |
| SIDDIQI, ISRAR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/27/2025 |
| OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2017 |
| OMG IN MSTR LSCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/15/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 39% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155496. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.