No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Allen View Healthcare Center

2615 Derr Road, Springfield, OH 45503 · For profit - Corporation · 124 certified beds · (937) 390-0005 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (937) 390-0005 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0741)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
1164 E Home Rd · (937) 342-9260 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
CVS Photo0.6 mi
2987 Derr Rd · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.6 mi
2989 Derr Rd · (937) 390-2390 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.9%5.3%15.4%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.7%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.2%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms40.3%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.1%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.8%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.9%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.1%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.0%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.1%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.4%12.9%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.7%CMS range 30.1–65.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 7.4–18.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.181.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
0.80
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.85
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.25
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
52.5%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 102.0 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-21)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2023-03-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

65 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely assess a resident's wounds. This affected one (#95) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The census was 98.684Findings include: Review of Resident #95's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/26/23. Diagnoses listed included hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteomyelitis, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, morbid obesity, and diabetic neuropathy. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #95 had moderately impaired cognition and had no venous or arterial ulcers. Review of the physician orders for Resident #95 revealed an order dated 04/27/26 for calcium alginate (absorbent wound dressing) and duoderm (bordered foam dressing) to the bottom of right foot. Review of treatment administration records (TAR) revealed the calcium alginate, and duoderm treatment was completed 04/27/256 through 05/07/26. Review of a weekly skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility to ensure resident medications were not left at bedside during administration. This affected one (#88) of three reviewed for medications. The census was 98.Review of Resident #88's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/28/19. Diagnoses listed included obstructive sleep apnea, osteoarthritis, arthritis, and obesity. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed Resident #88 had moderately impaired cognition. Observation during an interview with Resident #88 on 06/15/26 at 10:58 A.M. revealed a medication cup containing various pills and tablets on the bedside table. Resident #88 stated his nurse had left them there for him to take. Interview and observation with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/15/26 at 11:01 A.M. confirmed medications were left at Resident #88's bedside. The DON confirmed nurses should watch residents take their medications. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #216 on 06/15/26 at 11:08 A.M. confirmed he left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were receiving the correct urinary catheter size in accordance with the resident's physician order and care plan. This affected one (#93) of three residents reviewed for urinary catheter placement. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #93 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to quadriplegia and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #93 dated 01/07/26 revealed an intact cognition. Resident #93 required set up for eating and total staff dependance for bed mobility, transfers and toileting. Resident #93 was coded as having an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the plan of care for Resident #93 revealed resident has an indwelling urinary catheter related to neurogenic bladder secondary to quadriplegia. Interventions include change Mitrofanoff catheter 12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and pharmacist interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as physician ordered. This affected one (#104) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility censes was 102. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #104 revealed an admission on [DATE] and a transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #104 returned to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 12/28/25. Diagnoses included but not limited to end stage renal disease with hemodialysis, essential hypertension, and history of myocardial infarction. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #104 had an intact cognition. Resident #104 required set up assistance for eating, supervision for bed mobility and transfers. Resident #104 was independent for toileting. Review of the plan of care for Resident #104 dated 12/12/25 revealed resident has altered cardiovascular status related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff appropriately changed contaminated gloves during incontinent care. This affected one (#95) of three residents reviewed for incontinent care. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #95 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke and urinary incontinence. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #95 dated 12/16/25 revealed an intact cognition. Resident #95 required set up assistance for eating, moderate assistance for bed mobility and total dependance for toileting. Resident #95's toileting transfer was not attempted due to medical condition or safety concerns. Resident #95 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the plan of care dated 03/14/25 for Resident #95 revealed activities of daily living self-care performance focus. Intervention included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, water management plan review, water management plan log review, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to update their Legionella water management plan and complete the routine monitoring of the Legionella water management plan. This affected 110 out of 110 residents that resided at the facility. The facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions and contact precautions. This affected three (#10, #63 and #82) of three residents reviewed for infection control precautions. The facility census was 110. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's water management program plan, dated 01/26/18, revealed the facility's prior name was scratched out on the plan and the facility's current name was handwritten on the plan. The water management plan listed the names and phone numbers of a Administrator, a Maintenance Director and Infection Control Preventionist that no longer worked at the facility. The plan stated that fixture flushing logs would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident, family and staff interview, review of facility policy, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) were provided regular assistance with showers and grooming. This affected four (#4, #63, #67, and #263) of four residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility census was 110. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #63's chart revealed Resident #63 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included morbid obesity due to excess calories, muscle weakness, non-pressure chronic ulcer of back limited to break down of skin, and cellulitis of right lower limb. Review of Resident #63's activities of daily living (ADL) care plan dated 10/01/24 revealed Resident #63 had an ADL self care performance deficit. Resident #63 occasionally refused showers. Interventions included offer bed bath if a shower is refused and Resident #63 required supervision with shower transfers. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain resident rooms in a clean and homelike manner. This affected 14 residents (#4, #5, #6, #11, #15, #32, #34, #37, #47, #51, #80, #85, #94, and #101) of 15 residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 110. Findings include 1. Observation on 04/14/25 at 10:27 A.M. revealed Resident #11's room door did not shut property and did not latch to stay closed. Subsequent observation and interview on 04/15/25 at 10:49 A.M. with Maintenance Director #60 confirmed Resident #11 had broken door that would not secure and stay closed. 2. Observation on 04/14/25 at 10:43 A.M. revealed Resident #37 and #47's room door was chipped on the outside edges. The resident's door was hard to close and took two hands and pulling and tugging on the door to get it to partially close. Subsequent observation and interview on 04/15/25 at 10:50 A.M. with Maintenance Director #60 confirmed Resident #37 and #47's room door had broken door that would not close easily. 3. Observation on 04/14/25 at 10:50 A.M. revealed Resident #5 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's advance directives were clearly maintained and documented in the resident's medical record. This affected two (Residents #11 and #47) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 110. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 05/24/24. Diagnoses included diabetes, dementia, schizoaffective disorder, muscle weakness major depressive disorder, repeated falls, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the signed physician attestation form for advance directives in the resident's paper chart dated 04/30/24 revealed Resident #11 was a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care-Arrest (DNRCC-A). Review of undated paperwork in Resident #11's paper chart in front of the signed physician attestation form revealed a stop sign on a paper with large letters DNRCC [Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care]. Interview on 04/15/25 at 5:00 P.M. with Divisional Director of Clinical Operations #131 confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility's self-reported incident (SRI) and investigation, resident and staff interview, review of police report, personnel file, and e-mails, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse by an employee and staff witnessing the abuse did not intervene. This affected one (Resident #90) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of Resident #90's medical record revealed Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included focal traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of thirty minutes functional quadriplegia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder and mood disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #90 was cognitively intact and was independent with toileting, transferring, personal hygiene, and walking ten feet. Review of Resident #90's progress notes from 08/21/25 to 04/16/25 revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 55 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded for falls and discharge location. This affected two (#90 and #109) of 23 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The facility census was 110. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #90's medical record revealed Resident #90 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included focal traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of thirty minutes or less and functional quadriplegia. Review of Resident #90's post fall evaluation dated 10/18/24 revealed Resident #90 fell at the facility on 10/18/24 at 9:00 P.M. Resident #90 was moving in his wheelchair in his room and Resident #90's wheelchair slid out from under him. Resident #90's wheelchair was not locked. Review of Resident #90's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #90 had no falls since the prior assessment. Interview with MDS Registered Nurse (MDS RN) #34 on 04/16/25 at 3:39 P.M. verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority with a significant change Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for a resident that had a change in their mental health condition. This affected one (#90) of two residents reviewed for significant change PASARR. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of Resident #90's chart revealed Resident #90 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included unspecified focal traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of thirty minutes. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #90 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #90's diagnosis list dated 04/21/25 revealed Resident #90 had a new diagnosis of major depressive disorder recurrent added on 12/26/24. Review of Resident #90's chart from 08/26/24 to 04/15/25 revealed Resident #90 did not have a significant change PASARR or notification to the state mental health authority of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop care plans to address a resident's use of an anticoagulant and a resident's vision needs. This affected two (#67 and #90) of 23 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 110. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #90's chart revealed Resident #90 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #90's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and received an anticoagulant during the review period. Review of Resident #90's physician order dated 08/21/24 revealed Resident #90 was ordered Apixaban (anticoagulant) oral tablet five milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth every morning and bedtime for peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #90's care plan dated 04/15/25 revealed Resident #90 did not have a care plan for Resident #90's anticoagulant use and to monitor the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were given the opportunity to participate in the development of their care plans and the care plan meetings had a interdisciplinary team present. This affected three (#16, #63, and #90) of six residents reviewed for resident participation in care planning. The facility census was 110. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #63's chart revealed Resident #63 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included with type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, major depressive disorder, non-pressure chronic ulcer of back limited to break down of skin, and cellulitis of right lower limb. Review of Resident #63's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #63's progress notes from 09/30/24 to 04/15/25 revealed Resident #63 did not have any care conferences or an opportunity to participate in the development of his care plan. Interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff communicated with residents in a language or manner they could understand. This affected one (Resident #94) of one resident reviewed for communication and language. The facility census was 110. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 10/01/24. Diagnoses included cerebral infarct, hemiplegia, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #94 had cognitive impairments. Review of Resident #94's care plan dated 10/02/24 revealed resident only spoke Haitian Creole with interventions including utilize language line for interpreter and provide the following tools to aide in communication in primary language (interpreter, communication board etc.) and offer interpretation services. Observation and interview on 04/14/25 at 11:15 A.M. with Resident #94 without use of interpreter revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure skin checks were completed weekly as care planned, wound treatments were completed as order and physician orders were clarified for skin impairment treatments. This affected one (#18) of three reviewed for non-pressure skin impairments. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 11/04/22. Diagnoses included post procedural hematoma, unspecified open wound of the left arm, end stage renal disease, renal dialysis, malnutrition and heart disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 was cognitively intact and the resident had a stage four pressure wound and a non-pressure wound. Review of the plan of care dated 04/09/25 revealed resident was at risk for skin impairment with interventions to follow with wound provider, nursing to monitor skin impairments,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, family interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure vision services were provided as recommended by vision specialist. This affected one (#67) of one resident reviewed for vision services. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 05/19/24. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, failure to thrive, dysphasia, heart disease, kidney failure, and subdural hemorrhage. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #67 was cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff mobility and activities of daily living. Review of eye exam notes dated 10/11/24 revealed new orders or recommendations for cataract surgery with ophthalmology consult with follow up with the eye provider in five to six months. The medical record contained no other information about cataract surgery or eye provider follow ups. Review of the care plan on 04/17/25 found…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure falls were thoroughly investigated to determine potential cause of the falls to prevent future falls. This affected one (#67) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 05/19/24. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, failure to thrive, dysphasia, heart disease, kidney failure, and subdural hemorrhage. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #67 was cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff mobility and activities of daily living. Review of the care plan with initiated date of 05/19/24 revealed the resident was at risk of falls with interventions for bed in lowest position, perimeter mattress, floor mats at bedside to prevent injury from fall, toileting upon rise, and after meals and as needed at night, educate resident how to use bed remote control,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's urinary catheter collection bag was properly maintained to prevent potential infections. This affected one (#211) of two residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The census was 110. Findings include: Review of Resident #211's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/10/25. Diagnoses listed included type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, and malnutrition. Observation on 04/15/25 at 7:38 A.M., revealed Resident #211's urinary catheter collection bag was observed on the floor beside the bed. Resident #211 was lying in bed. Interview on 04/15/25 at 7:49 A.M., with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #30 confirmed Resident #211's urinary catheter collection bag was on the floor. CNA #30 stated Resident #211's family requested the urinary catheter collection bag remain on the floor due to his confusion. Interview with on 04/15/25 at 8:00 A.M., with Divisional Director of Clinical Services (DDCS) #131 confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received routine dental care. This affected one (#63) of two residents reviewed for dental care. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed Resident #63 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, morbid obesity due to excess calories, obstructive and reflux uropathy, calculus of ureter, presence of urogenital implants, muscle weakness, iron deficiency anemia, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, tachycardia, localized edema, non-pressure chronic ulcer of back limited to break down of skin, and cellulitis of right lower limb. Review of Resident #63's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and Resident #63 was independent with eating. Resident #63 required set up assistance with eating and oral hygiene.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy and thoroughness of the documentation in the resident medical record. This affected two (#18 and #107) of 23 sampled resident records reviewed. Facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included post procedural hematoma, unspecified open wound of the left arm, end stage renal disease, renal dialysis, malnutrition and heart disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 was cognitively intact and revealed the resident had a stage four pressure wound and a non-pressure wound. Review of the plan of care dated [DATE] revealed resident was at risk for skin impairment with interventions to follow with wound provider, nursing to monitor skin impairments, administer treatments as ordered and complete weekly skin checks. Review of physician orders dated [DATE] revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0848 — isolated
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure arbitration agreements provided for the selection of a venue that was convenient to both parties. This affected three (#90, #98 and #99) of three residents reviewed for arbitration agreements. The facility census was 110. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #90's chart revealed Resident #90 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of unspecified focal traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of thirty minutes or less, unspecified viral hepatitis c without hepatic coma, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, anemia, functional quadriplegia, polycystic kidney adult type, bipolar disorder, chronic pain syndrome, major depressive disorder, insomnia, glaucoma, hypertension, mood disorder, alcohol dependence, acute kidney failure, and seborrheic dermatitis. Review of Resident #90's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and Resident #90 was independent with eating,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review, pest control invoice review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a pest free environment. This affected two (#5 and #94) of two residents reviewed for pest control. Facility census was 110. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 10/01/24. Diagnoses included malnutrition, diabetes, cerebral infarct, hemiplegia, dysphasia, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #94 was cognitively intact and would ambulate with use of a walker. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 05/11/20. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, hemiplegia, diabetes, dysphasia, and unspecified psychosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was cognitively impaired and would ambulate with use of a wheelchair. Observation and interview on 04/15/25 at 10:49…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to accommodate resident preferences to create a home-like environment when the common dining room was closed without resident notice. This affected 10 (#6, #25, #32, #36, #38, #41, #71, #79, #92, and #110) of 114 residents who frequently dine in the common dining room. The facility identified two (#33 and #53) residents who receive no food by mouth. The census was 116. Finding included: Observation on the dining room door leading into the dining room for residents on 02/04/25 at 7:22 A.M. revealed there was a sign on the door indicating the dining room was closed. Interview with Dietary Aide (DA) #305 on 02/03/25 at 7:25 A.M. revealed the sign on the door referred to 02/02/25 because a nurse aide from the facility told them they did not have enough staff and the residents would not be coming to the dining room for meals for that day. Interview with DA #159 on 02/03/25 at 7:27 A.M. revealed there were only four nurse aides on the hall and there was not enough nurse aides to provide service in the dining room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient staffing levels to accommodate for the common dining room to remain open for resident use. This affected 10 (#6, #25, #32, #36, #38, #41, #71, #79, #92, and #110) of 114 residents who frequently dine in the common dining room. The facility identified two (#33 and #53) residents who receive no food by mouth. The census was 116. Finding included: Observation on the dining room door leading into the dining room for residents on 02/04/25 at 7:22 A.M. revealed there was a sign on the door indicating the dining room was closed. Interview with Dietary Aide (DA) #305 on 02/03/25 at 7:25 A.M. revealed the sign on the door referred to 02/02/25 because a nurse aide from the facility told them they did not have enough staff and the residents would not be coming to the dining room for meals for that day. Interview with DA #159 on 02/03/25 at 7:27 A.M. revealed there were only four nurse aides on the hall and there was not enough nurse aides to provide service in the dining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, family interview, staff interview, record review, review of the staffing tool, review of staff schedules, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the facility had adequate staffing to meet the resident's needs. This affected one (Resident #104) of three residents reviewed for staffing and had potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 113. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #104 revealed an admission date of 12/06/24. Diagnoses included fracture of unspecified part of the neck of femur, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia with anxiety, hearing loss, heart disease, muscle weakness, and a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Review of the plan of care dated 12/07/24 revealed Resident #104 required assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #104 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview of Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident meals were prepared, distributed, and served in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent contamination. This had the potential to affect all facility residents, except two (#74 and #87) that were identified with orders for no oral intake (NPO). The census was 113. Findings include: Observations on 12/24/24 from 11:45 A.M. to 12:20 P.M. revealed the trays were soaked and puddles of dish water were noted. Plates were placed on the trays and then held over the food warming table. While the trays with plates were hovering over the food warming table, (dish) water from the trays dripped into the food on the service line from the bottom of the tray. The divided plates were then brought from the dish area for the meal service. [NAME] #410 held a divided plate over the food while scooping food onto the plate and during that time, dishwater dripped from the divided plates into the food on the service line. [NAME] #410 wore gloves during tray line service and touched the handle for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, family interviews, staff interviews, record review, review of the State agency online reporting portal, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the State agency within the required timeframes. This affected one (Resident #100) of five residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of 12/14/24. Diagnoses included heart failure, headache, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, muscle weakness, and bacterial infection. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 and was dependent on staff for showering/bathing and lower body dressing. Resident #100 also required supervision/touching assistance for bed mobility and moderate assistance for transfers and mobility. Interview on 12/24/24 at 1:10 P.M. with Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-30 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of hospital records, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #115 was able to return to the facility following a hospital stay. This affected one (Resident #115) out of three residents reviewed for discharges. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #115 revealed an admission date of 10/07/24 and a discharge date of 12/03/24, with diagnoses of paraplegia, non-pressure chronic ulcer of buttock with unspecified severity, and unspecified injury at T7 to T10 level of the thoracic spinal cord. The resident was his own responsible party. Review of Resident #115's care plan dated 10/14/24 revealed resident was totally dependent on staff assistance for toileting hygiene and dressing and he required substantial/maximal assistance for bathing. Further review of the care plan revealed on 12/03/24 a care plan was initiated for behavioral health consults as needed. Review of the Discharge Return Not Anticipated Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure Resident #100 received the home health company of choice upon discharge. This affected one (Resident #100) out of three residents reviewed for discharges. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #100 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 11/12/24 with diagnoses of acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance. Review of the Discharge Return Not Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 was cognitively intact and required supervision with toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation. Review of the Discharge Summary assessment dated [DATE] revealed Interim Healthcare Home Health Services were contacted by Social Services Designee #403 to provide home health services for Resident #100 upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, residents and staff interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). This affected one (Resident #104) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #104 revealed an admission date of 12/06/24. Diagnoses included fracture of unspecified part of the neck of femur, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia with anxiety, hearing loss, heart disease, muscle weakness, and a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Review of the plan of care dated 12/07/24 revealed Resident #104 required assistance from staff for activities of daily living. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #104 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 and required substantial maximum assistance for showering and bathing and was dependent with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-30 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate nursing services to assure residents could attain and/or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being while ensuring Resident #115's mobility was not restricted. This affected one (Resident #115) out of three residents reviewed for discharges. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #115 revealed an admission date of 10/07/24 and a discharge date of 12/03/24, with diagnoses of paraplegia, non-pressure chronic ulcer of buttock with unspecified severity, and unspecified injury at T7-T10 level of thoracic spinal cord. Review of Resident #115's care plan dated 10/08/24 revealed the resident was at risk for impaired psychosocial well being related to a history of trauma and/or trauma related symptoms with interventions to approach the provision of care and services for those residents with a history of trauma with dignity and respect and provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected three residents (#97, #100, and #104) out of five residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. Observation on 12/24/25 at 8:54 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #401 revealed medication administration of a Norvasc 10 milligram (mg) tablet. LPN #401 dropped the medication onto the top of the medication cart and picked it up with her bare hands and administered it to Resident #97. 2. Observation on 12/24/24 at 9:13 A.M. with LPN #401 revealed medication administration of a Vitamin D 25 microgram (mcg) tablet. LPN #401 dropped the medication onto the top of the medication cart and picked it up with her bare hands and administered it to Resident #100. 3. Observation on 12/24/24 at 9:31 A.M. with LPN #401 revealed medication administration of two Oyster Calcium 500 mg tablets. LPN #401 dropped the medication onto the top of the medication cart and picked it up with her bare hands and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure equipment was maintained and in working order. This affected two residents (#99 and #100) of three reviewed for environment. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of 12/14/24. Diagnoses included heart failure, headache, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, muscle weakness, and bacterial infection. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 and was dependent on staff for showering, bathing, and lower body dressing. The resident also required supervision/touching assistance for bed mobility and moderate assistance for transfers and mobility. Interview on 12/24/24 at 11:05 A.M. with Maintenance Director #555 revealed he started a few days ago and that the facility had no outstanding list of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-24 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview, the facility failed to provide residents with discharge summaries. This affected three (#110, #111, and #112) out of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 100. Findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #110 revealed an admission date of 07/04/24 and a discharge date of 09/17/24. Diagnoses included disruption of internal operation surgical wound, acute metabolic acidosis, severe sepsis with septic shock, type two diabetes mellitus with unspecified diabetic retinopathy without macular edema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, end stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, and major depressive disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #110 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #110 was assessed to require partial to moderate assistance for eating, oral hygiene, personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to initiate treatment on a pressure ulcer present upon a resident readmission. This affected one (#77) out of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was recently readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses include acute and subacute infective endocarditis, bacteremia, anxiety, morbid obesity, type two diabetes, non-displaced fracture of the fifth metatarsal bone, right foot, and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/15/23 revealed Resident #77 had a pressure ulcer/injury, a scar over bony prominence, or a non-removable dressing/device - one stage three pressure area present. Review of Resident #77's care plan initiated on 01/06/24 revealed a care focus for set-up assistance with eating with intervention of staff assistance of set-up. A care focus for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespread
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, activity calendar review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a variety of activities were offered to meet residents' needs and interests. This affected two (#41 and #48) of two residents reviewed for activities and had potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 100. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 12/28/17. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, aortic aneurysm, poly neuropathy, dysphagia, and pneumonia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 was cognitively intact with a BIMS of 15 and was independent with mobility. Review of the activity assessment dated [DATE] was completed by the activity manager and revealed Resident #41's preferred activity setting included activities in his own room and included more art themed activities and a private area for visitation for residents in semiprivate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to safely store food in the walk in freezer and dry storage areas of the kitchen. This affected all residents except Resident #16 and #76 who do not eat food from the kitchen. The facility census was 100. Finding include Observation on 03/27/23 at 9:51 A.M., revealed in the walk in freezer: chicken tenders were left open to air and undated; hamburger patties were left open to air and undated; fish patties were left open to air and updated; cinnamon rolls were left open to air and updated and three boxes of cookie dough were left open to air and undated. Observation on 03/27/23 at 9:57 A.M., revealed in the dry storage: two - one gallon bottles of red cooking wine was stamped best if used by 06/21/22. Interview on 03/27/23 at 10:03 A.M., with Kitchen Manager #181 confirmed above findings. Observation on 03/27/23 at 10:05 A.M., revealed a sign on walk-in freezer stating all items must have opening date. Review of the policy titled, Food Storage Dry Goods dated September 2017 revealed dry storage goods…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-30 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident council minutes, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident council concerns were addressed in a timely manner. The facility also failed to ensure residents were knowledgeable on how to file a complaint with the state or contact the Ombudsman. This affected three (#31, #36, #20) of 10 residents that regularly attend the resident council, with the potential to affect the 10 residents. The facility census was 100. Findings included: Review of the resident council meeting minutes from 06/28/22 through 02/23/23 revealed there wasn't any education given to the residents about contacting the state agency about a complaint about their care, or how to contact the ombudsman regarding any issues they may have. All of the minutes said to place concerns on concern forms and distribute to appropriate department heads. There was various concerns brought up for different departments. There was no resolution forms or areas of corrections forms related to the concerns brought up by residents. Interviews on 03/30/23 at 11:33…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Interview on 03/28/23 at 9:10 A.M., with Resident #31 revealed at times the bathroom sink water was too hot. Observation on 03/28/23 from 9:29 A.M. to 9:42 A.M., revealed Resident #31's bathroom sink had a temperature of 139 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and Resident #41's bathroom sink had a temperature of 138 degrees F. Interview on 03/28/23 at 9:42 A.M., with Resident #41 revealed the bathroom sink water temperature was hot to touch. Observation on 03/28/23 from 9:50 A.M. to 10:10 A.M., with Administrator revealed water temperature as follows: Resident #31's room water temperature was 137.8 degrees F; Resident #28 and #87's room water temperature was 135.3 degrees F; Resident #23 and #41's room water temperature was 137.8 degrees F; Resident #53 and #58's room water temperature was 132.9 degrees F; Resident #2 and #10's room water temperature was 138.6 degrees F; Resident #29 and #63's room water temperature was 133.8 degrees F; Resident #66's room water temperature was 136.5 degrees F; Resident #77 and #84's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored with open dates and not kept past expiration dates. This affected 13 (#10, #15, #21, #87, #54, #86, #89, #96, #19, #95, #37, #64, and #27) of 13 residents' insulins observed in medication storage. The facility identified 23 Residents who currently receive insulin. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Observation on 03/30/23 at 2:41 P.M., of the 300 hall medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #128 verified the Lantus insulin vial for Resident #10 had no open date or correlating expiration date. Observation on 03/30/23 at 2:55 P.M., of the 200 hall medication care with LPN #169 verified the insulin Aspart vial for Resident #15 opened 02/25/23 was expired and should not be in the cart. Observation on 03/30/23 at 3:02 P.M., of the 400 hall medication cart with LPN #123 verified the Lantus Pen for Resident #21, the Humalog vial for Resident #87, the Humalog Pen for Resident #87, and the Insulin Glargine Pen for Resident #54 had no open date or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity during resident care. This affected one (#48) of three residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 100. Findings included: Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/28/19, with diagnoses including nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, deep vein thrombosis, diabetes and obesity. Review of annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #48 was cognitively intact. Resident #48 functional status was extensive assistance with two-person assistance with bed mobility and toilet use. Resident #48 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the care plan dated 01/05/23 revealed Resident #48 was at risk for bowel and bladder incontinence related to impaired mobility. Interview with Resident #48 on 03/28/23 at 11:45 A.M., reported he has urgency and will go a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and resident representatives were offered the opportunity to participate in care planning. This affected two (#31 and #60) of two residents reviewed for care conferences. Facility census was 100. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 01/21/13. Diagnoses included diabetes, convulsions, dementia, contractures of bilateral knees, and edema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 was cognitively intact and was independent with mobility. Review of the medical record revealed no evidence of a care conference being held during the second quarter of 2022. Interview on 03/29/23 at 4:55 P.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there was no evidence of a care conference being held in the second quarter of 2022. 2. Medical record review for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 03/13/20.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed for self-administration of medication. This affected one (#41) of 26 residents observed in the sample. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 12/28/17. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, aortic aneurysm, poly neuropathy, dysphagia, and pneumonia. Review of the Self Administration of Medication assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 required assistance with ear drops, suppositories and subcutaneous injections. Resident #41 had no recent assessments for self-administration of medication. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 was cognitively intact and was independent with mobility. Review of the plan of care dated 03/30/23 revealed Resident #41 did not have a care plan entry related to medication self-administration prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to issue the CMS -20052 form to indicate skilled coverage was ending. This affected two (#35 and #26) of three residents who exhausted their Medicare Part A Skilled Services. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Review of Resident #206's (Skilled Nursing Facility) SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review revealed the last day covered was 12/08/22 the Resident discharged on 12/09/23. The Form CMS-20052 was not issued 48 hours prior to the resident's last day of coverage. Review of Resident #38's SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review revealed his last day of coverage was 03/23/22 and Resident #38 went home on 3/24/23. The Form CMS-20052 was no issued 48 hours prior to the resident's last day of coverage . Interview on 03/28/23 at 10:00 A.M., with Registered Nurse (RN) #200 verified she did not issue the Form CMS-20052 was no issued 48 hours prior to the resident's last day of coverage because the residents decided to be discharged .

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's room was provided a room in a home like environment by not utilizing the resident's room for facility storage. The affected one (#18) of six residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Interview on 03/27/23 at 9:30 A.M., with Resident #18 revealed there was items stored in his room that was not his and he keeps his curtain pulled. Observation on 03/27/23 at 9:30 A.M., 03/28/23 at 5:27 P.M., and on 03/29/23 at 4:51 P.M., of Resident #18's room revealed the room was a two person room. Resident #18 resided in B bed with his curtain drawn. There was no accommodations for a roommate, because there was no bed A in the room. The space for bed A was being utilized as storage for the facility. Two large floor polishing machines, two Hoyer (mechanical) lifts, an extra wide wheelchair that does not belong to Resident #18 and various boxes were being stored in Resident #18's room Observation on 03/28/23 at 5:27 P.M., revealed Resident #18 had his curtain drawn…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify residents or resident representatives of facility policy for bed holds, to include amount of bed hold days used and left and potential cost liability. This affected two (#54 and #86) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The census was 100. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #54 revealed admission date 12/13/22. Diagnoses including diabetes mellitus 2 (DM2), chronic venous hypertension (idiopathic) with other complications of bilateral lower extremity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 had intact cognition. The MDS data revealed Resident #54 discharged with return anticipated on 12/23/22 and returned 12/28/22. Interview on 03/20/23 at 11:39 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she was not able to locate any Bed Hold documentation for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview and policy review, facility failed to ensure members of the interdisciplinary team (IDT) with the resident and/or resident representative reviewed and revised care plans at least quarterly. This affected two (#31 and #60) of two residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 100. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 01/21/13. Diagnoses included diabetes, convulsions, dementia, contractures of bilateral knees, and edema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 was cognitively intact and was independent with mobility. Review of the medical record revealed there was no evidence of a care plan conference being held or the IDT reviewing the care plan during the second quarter of 2022. Review of the progress notes dated 07/21/22 revealed a care conference was held and the MDS Nurse #200 was the only staff member in attendance. Review of Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews and policy reviews, the facility failed to provide timely assistance with discharge planning for a resident requesting to discharge from the facility. This affected one (#48) of one resident reviewed for discharge planning. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 01/28/19. Diagnoses included non-traumatic cerebral hemorrhage, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, diabetes, epilepsy and cerebral edema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers. Review of progress note dated 10/26/22 revealed the (previous) Administrator spoke with resident about discharge planning and sent a referral to a requested facility which was declined due to the requested facility doing renovations. Progress notes dated 03/30/23 revealed MDS Nurse #200 spoke with resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure bathing was provided for dependent residents. This affected three (#64, #27, #48) of three residents reviewed for bathing. The census was 100. Findings included: 1. Medical record review for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 09/26/19. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, and diabetes. Review of the care plan dated 09/20/22 revealed Resident #64 has an activities of daily living (ADLs) deficit related to impaired mobility and morbid obesity. Her preference for bathing was a bed bath and Mondays and Thursdays. Review of bathing from 12/23/22 through 03/28/23 revealed out of 28 opportunities Resident #64 received 19 bed baths. There were no refusals. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #64 was cognitively intact. Her functional status was extensive assistance for bed mobility, toilet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with incontinence supplies to prevent the potential for infections and skin impairments. This affected one (#48) of two residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence during the annual survey. The census was 100. Findings included: Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/28/19, with diagnoses including nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, deep vein thrombosis, diabetes and obesity. Review of annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #48 was cognitively intact. Resident #48 functional status was extensive assistance with two-person assistance with bed mobility and toilet use. Resident #48 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the care plan dated 01/05/23 revealed Resident #48 was at risk for bowel and bladder incontinence related to impaired mobility. Interview with Resident #48 on 03/28/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a complete an accurate medical record was maintained for a resident. This affected one (#48) of 33 total resident records reviewed. The facility census was 100. Finding include Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 01/28/19. Diagnoses included non-traumatic cerebral hemorrhage, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, diabetes, epilepsy and cerebral edema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers and required total dependence for bathing. Review of hospital records dated 07/08/17 revealed resident had a transverse fracture of shaft of humerus with nonunion. The document also stated a resident had a bone matrix putty implanted into the right arm. Review of the facility medical record found no evidence or documentation mentioning a right upper arm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and review of facility policy,the facility failed to update the care plan when a resident's fluid restriction was discontinued. This affected one (Resident #94) of one resident reviewed for hydration. The facility also failed to conduct quarterly care conferences for three Residents (#22, #72, and #109) of five residents reviewed for participation in care planning. The census was 121. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, polydipsia, hypertension, generalized anxiety disorder, and convulsions. Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #94 was independent in activities of daily living with set up help only. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #94 received a regular diet with regular food texture and thin consistency fluids. A fluid restriction consisting of 2000 cubic centimeters…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of directions for sani cloth bleach germicidal disposable wipes the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control procedures for the cleaning of the blood glucose monitoring machine after each use to prevent the spread of infections. This affected one (Resident #102) of two residents reviewed for blood glucose monitoring. The facility identified 10 Residents (#9, #16, #36, #37, #48, #49, #53, #54, #56, and #96) who received blood glucose monitoring on the 200 hallway. The facility census was 121. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #102 was admitted on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis of: type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and convulsions. Observation of a blood sugar glucose monitoring check on 01/29/20 at 9:20 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #301 was preparing to check the blood sugar for Resident #102. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-30 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff nterview, and review of facility guidelines the facility failed to accurately assess residents in the Pre-admission Screening/Resident Review (PASRR) process. This affected two Resident's (#66 and #109) of four residents reviewed for PASRR's. The census was 121. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 11/14/19 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, depression, and hypertension. Review of Resident #66's PASRR dated 11/14/19 revealed the resident was marked as having a diagnosis of panic or other severe anxiety disorder. Further review of Resident #66's PASRR dated 11/14/19 revealed the residents diagnosis of bipolar disorder was not included on the PASRR. Interview with Social Services Director (SSD) #205 on 01/28/20 at 3:52 P.M. verified Resident #66 had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and it was not included on the PASRR dated 11/14/19. During the interview, Director of Social Services #205 verified the residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility guidelines, the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority and state intellectual disability (ID) authority after a significant change. This affected one (Resident #109) of four residents screened for Pre-admission Screens/Resident Reviews (PASRR). The census was 121. Findings include: Review of Resident #109's medical record revealed and admission dated of 02/16/18. Diagnoses included convulsions, schizoaffective disorder, epilepsy, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #109's census information revealed she admitted to hospice services on 01/03/20. Review of Resident #109's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed she had a moderate cognitive impairment and received hospice services. Further review of Resident #109's medical record revealed a PASRR dated 10/31/19. Resident #109's diagnoses of epilepsy, an ID-related condition, was not on the PASRR. The medical record lacked evidence a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to address frequent urinary tract infections (UTIs) on the comprehensive care plan. This affected one (Resident #10) of 22 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The census was 121. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 07/13/16 with diagnoses including hemiplegia/hemiparesis, cerebral infarction, and diabetes mellitus type two. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was coded as always incontinent of bowel and required extensive staff assistance with toileting. Review of Resident #10's active physician orders revealed an order dated 11/27/19 for Macrobid, an antibiotic, 100 milligram (mg) capsule by mouth once per day due to frequent UTIs. The physician order for Macrobid dated 11/27/19 did not include a stop date. Review of Resident #10's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated January 2020 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of closed medical record, interview with facility staff, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to develop a post-discharge plan of care that addressed discharge needs, goals, treatment preferences, caregiver support as well as referrals made to address post-discharge needs. This affected one (Resident #119) of one resident reviewed for appropriate discharge planning. The census was 121. Findings include: Review of Resident #119's closed medical record revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She discharged to home on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, and delusions. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she discharged home to the community. She had a moderate cognitive impairment. She required extensive assistance from staff with bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, and personal hygiene. She was totally dependent on staff for bathing and required limited assistance with eating. Further review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview with facility staff, the facility failed to provide set-up assistance with eating. This affected one (Resident #109) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility identified 100 residents who required at minimum set-up assistance with eating. The census was 121. Findings include: Review of Resident #109's medical record revealed she admitted to the facility 02/16/18. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, schizoaffective disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of Resident #109's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision and one person physical assist with eating. Resident #109 received hospice services. Review of Resident #109's physician orders revealed on 08/29/18 she was ordered a regular diet, with ground meat texture, and regular texture per request. Review of Resident #109's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy the facility failed to provide fluids when a fluid restriction was discontinued. This affected one (Resident #94) of one resident reviewed for hydration. Facility census was 121. Findings include Review of the medical record revealed Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, polydipsia, hypertension, generalized anxiety disorder, and convulsions. Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #94 was independent in activities of daily living with set up help only. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #94 received a regular diet with regular food texture and thin consistency fluids. A fluid restriction consisting of 2000 cubic centimeters (cc) per 24 hours was ordered on 01/23/19 with fluids to be given as follows: Dietary provided 420 cc of fluid with breakfast, 480 cc with lunch,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and manufacturers recommendations review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. Staff failed to ensure insulin lispro Humalog Kwikpen was primed prior to use according to manufacturer's recommendations. This may cause the resident to get too much or too little insulin. This affected one (Resident #49) of two residents observed for insulin administration. The facility census was 121. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #49 was admitted on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis of dementia without behavioral disturbance, hypertension, osteoarthritis, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, and insomnia. Review of the 11/11/19 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. She used a walker and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical record, observation, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at a residents bedside. This affected one (Resident #95) of five residents observed for medication administration. Facility census was 121. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #95 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, hypertension, generalized anxiety disorder, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of the admission observation tool dated 06/30/19 revealed Resident #95 did not wish to self administer medications. Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #95 required limited to extensive assistance for activities of daily living. Observation on 01/28/20 at 8:31 A.M. revealed a medication cup containing pudding and a medication was sitting on Resident #95's over bed table. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-02-04 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was updated and posted daily as required. This affected all 116 residents who resided in the facility. The census was 116. Findings included: Observation on 02/03/25 at 6:55 A.M., 11:27 A.M., and 3:25 P.M., and on 02/04/25 at 7:00 A.M. and 8:30 A.M. revealed the posted daily nurse staffing information was dated 12/24/24. Observation on 02/04/25 at 9:20 A.M. revealed the daily nurse staffing information was changed to 02/04/25. The interview with the Administrator on 02/04/25 at 9:30 A.M. revealed she did not know why the daily posting of nursing staff was dated 12/24/24 but confirmed it should be changed daily, and admitted she changed the posted nurse staffing information that morning to reflect the correct day of the staffing in the facility. Review of the undated policy titled, Nurse Staffing Information, revealed it is the policy of this facility to provide resident centered care that meets the psychosocial, physical, and emotional needs and concerns of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2020-01-30 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident council meetings, staff and resident interview, review of facility policy and Resident [NAME] of Rights, the facility failed to act promptly upon grievances of Resident Council nor demonstrate their response and rationale. This had the potential to affect all 121 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident Council Meeting minutes dated 08/27/19, 09/27/19, and 12/31/19 revealed Resident #81, the Resident Council president, had the following concerns: wanted less rice and fish, the food should have better flavor and he wanted to be asked what kind of snacks he would prefer at night. Further review of Resident Council documentation lacked evidence of facility follow-up, and/or rationale for not implementing recommendation/concerns. Interview on 01/28/20 at 12:32 P.M. with Activity Director (AD) #204 revealed she did not have evidence of follow-up for the concerns expressed on 08/27/19, 09/27/19, or 12/31/19. She stated she was not aware, until the surveyor inquired about follow-up from Resident Council, she was supposed to be completing another form. AD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2020-01-30 · tag F0574 — widespread
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview with facility staff and residents, observations, and review of Resident [NAME] of Rights the facility failed to ensure a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers for pertinent State regulatory and informational advocates were posted. This had the potential to affect all the residents. The census was 121. Findings include: Observation 01/27/20 at 4:30 P.M. revealed no postings of the required contact information for State regulatory as well as informational and advocacy groups. Interview on 01/27/20 at 4:56 P.M. the Administrator confirmed the required contact information was not posted in the facility. He stated he had only worked at the facility for six days and the required postings must have been taken down. Interview during Resident Council Facility Task on 01/28/20 at 2:04 P.M., Resident #81 (the Resident Council president) indicated he was not aware of any postings for contact information for State agencies and/or advocacy groups. Review of the Resident [NAME] of Rights, undated, revealed the facility must post, in a form and manner…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.2-2.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH 3 of 5Charleston Healthcare CenterCharleston, WV

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
STOLTZ, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/21/2018
WILHEIM, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/21/2018
DERR MGT CO., LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/17/2025
GROVES, DONNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
REMMERT, TIFFANYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/24/2023
VEMANA, SIVAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2018
OHI ASSET (OH) SPRINGFIELD, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 3%Other / private 22%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$328per resident / day
operating cost
$9,973per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$307per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365514. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next