No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Crestwood Care Center

225 W Main Street, Shelby, OH 44875 · For profit - Corporation · 130 certified beds · (419) 347-1266 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0607) — most recent May 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$232,204 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $232,204 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-25)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
199 W Main St, 2nd Floor · (567) 309-3000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
219 Mansfield Ave · (419) 347-8055 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
111 W Main St · (419) 543-2049 · Call to confirm hours
Park
280 W Main St · (419) 347-5131 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
158 W Main St · (419) 347-1896

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.1%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms30.0%30.1%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.9%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.1%6.1%16.1%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.8%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.4%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.5%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.8%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine45.6%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.5%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit23.1%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.251.731.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.241.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
76.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 76.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.8%CMS range 31.5–63.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.3–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge76.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 3.6–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
0.81
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.99
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.31
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
38.8%
Total nursing turnover
72.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 99.9 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-27)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2022-09-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

62 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This affected two (#14 and #110) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 104. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed admission to the facility occurred on [DATE] with diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, chronic pain, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of a comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was assessed as completely alert and oriented. Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed a physician order for the immunosuppressive medication to treat arthritis Humira subcutaneous (SQ) every 14 days. Review of Resident #14's medication administration record (MAR) for [DATE] revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #232 documented on the MAR that Resident #14 received his Humira injection on [DATE]. There was no other documentation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · L2024-01-08 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, job description review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident by effectively implementing their plan of correction. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when on-going non-compliance was identified during an on-site complaint and post-survey revisit, with previous deficiencies centering around appropriate supervision to prevent and address resident-to-resident physical and verbal abuse by Resident #100 to five residents (97, #98, #80, #83, and #101) who resided on the Memory Care Unit (MCU). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure Resident #100, and Resident #91 were free from significant medication errors, failed to accurately maintain resident records to accurately record resident-to-resident altercations, and failed to correct the frequency of physician visits. The facility failed to effectively implement their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of open and closed medical records, hospital record review, review of self-reported incidents (SRI), resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure residents were adequately supervised and interventions were put in place to prevent a resident-to-resident altercation. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, negative health outcomes, and/or death when, on 10/19/23, one resident (#06) was involved in an altercation with another resident (#100) which resulted in Resident #06 being pushed to the floor by Resident #100 who had a documented history of aggression and past incidents of physical altercations with other residents. The facility's failure to have appropriate supervision and interventions in place for Resident #100 resulted in Resident #06, who was previously able to self-ambulate, sustaining sacrum and pubic fractures because of the fall, and have rendered the resident unable to freely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-09-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide effective pain control relief to a resident. This resulted in Actual Harm to Resident #100 when her physician discontinued the use of a narcotic pain medication (Oxycodone) without notifying the resident resulting in Resident #100 experiencing withdrawal symptoms including nausea and trembling hands and Resident #100 experiencing severe pain. This affected one (Resident #100) of three residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of 02/29/24. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type two with diabetic neuropathy, osteoarthritis, and chronic pain syndrome. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 had intact cognition. Resident #100 had pain occasionally in the last five days of the assessment reference period to which she received pain medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0620 — isolated
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, admission agreement review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the consent to treat was signed timely. This affected one (#89) of three residents reviewed for consent to treat. The facility also failed to ensure admission agreements were signed timely. This affected one (#51) of three residents reviewed for admission agreements. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #89 revealed an admission date of 03/10/25 and discharge date of 03/14/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to fracture of unspecified part of the neck of left femur, metabolic encephalopathy, nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency, chronic atrial fibrillation, dementia, rheumatic tricuspid valve insufficiency, and thrombocytopenia. Review of minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely impaired with cognition and was rarely/never understood. Resident #89 was dependent for all activities of daily living. Review of nurses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure wound treatment orders were obtained in a timely manner. This affected three (#11, #51, and #89) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 03/03/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to peripheral vascular disease, type two diabetes, fracture of third and fourth lumbar vertebra, fracture of one rib, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant neoplasm of left bronchus, secondary malignant neoplasm of bone, and hypertension. Review of minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #11 had one stage three pressure ulcer present on admission and one unstageable pressure ulcer presenting as deep tissue injury present on admission. Review of Nursing admission Evaluation dated 03/03/25 documented the following non pressure skin issues; right lower leg front…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer wound treatment orders were obtained in a timely manner. This affected one (#11) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 03/03/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to peripheral vascular disease, type two diabetes, fracture of third and fourth lumbar vertebra, fracture of one rib, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant neoplasm of left bronchus, secondary malignant neoplasm of bone, and hypertension. Review of minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #11 had one stage three pressure ulcer present on admission and one unstageable pressure ulcer presenting as deep tissue injury present on admission. Review of Nursing admission Evaluation dated 03/03/25 revealed the following skin issues coccyx stage two pressure measuring 2.0…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the late administration medication report, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician order. This affected three (#11, #16, and #51) of seven residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed admission date of 03/03/25. Diagnoses included but not limited to peripheral vascular disease, type two diabetes, fracture of third and fourth lumbar vertebra, fracture of one rib, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant neoplasm of left bronchus, secondary malignant neoplasm of bone, and hypertension. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] (Medicare 5-day) revealed resident was cognitively intact. Review of current physician orders revealed Hydroxyzine (antihistamine) 25 milligrams (mg) three times daily. Review of late medication report revealed Hydroxyzine 25 mg was ordered at 9:00 P.M. and administered at 11:49 P.M. on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure clean food service areas and beard restraints were worn during food preparation. This had the potential to affect all 96 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility did not identify any residents who received nothing by mouth. Findings include: Observation and interview on 02/24/25 at 8:30 A.M. of the secured unit pantry revealed the microwave had dried food splatter in the inside of the microwave. This was verified by Dietary Aide #344. Observation and interview on 02/24/25 at 8:32 A.M. of the snack refrigerator located behind the nurses' station in the secured unit revealed there were dried liquid spills on the bottom of the refrigerator. The freezer had dried frozen liquid at the bottom of the freezer, protein balls were on a tray not covered, labeled or dated. There was a package of veggie burgers that did not have an open date. This was verified by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #359 verified at 8:32 A.M. Observation on 02/25/25 at 4:03 P.M., revealed [NAME]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure personal property was secured and returned timely to the resident. This affected one (Resident #18) of one resident reviewed for missing personal property. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed diagnoses including generalized anxiety and cerebral palsy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 had intact cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Interview with Resident #18 on 02/24/25 at 12:26 P.M. revealed Resident #18 had multiple clothing items (shirts, pants, and socks) that were sent to laundry and never returned, including a comforter. Resident #18 stated the comforter has been missing for around two weeks now. There were approximately four T-shirts, three pairs of sweatpants, and an unknown number of socks missing. Resident #18 stated he often…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, review of facility policy, and record review, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were developed and/or summaries of the baseline care plan were provided to the residents and/or their representatives. This affected two (#79 and #81) of five residents who were reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an admission date of 11/13/24 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #79 was severely impaired cognition and required substantial assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the medical record revealed no evidence of a baseline care plan was established to address Resident #79's care needs. There was no evidence Resident #79's resident representative was provided with a copy of the baseline care plan. Interview with the Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff, family, and resident interview, review of facility policy, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities were offered and provided to all the residents routinely. This affected two (Residents #15 and #79) of three residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed admission date of 05/15/14. Diagnoses included sequela of cerebral infarction, type II diabetes mellitus, and dementia. Resident #15's birthday was in the month of February. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had significant cognitive impairment. Resident #15 was dependent on staff for upper body dressing, lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear, and personal hygiene. Review of the care plan for Resident #15 revealed the facility will assist with transport to activities as needed and ensure activities were compatible with resident's physical and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observation, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were completed per physician orders. This affected two (#28 and #54) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility identified 21 residents with non-pressure wounds. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #28 had an admission date of 06/13/19. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and pulmonary fibrosis. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 had intact cognition. Review of a nurse practitioner wound note dated 02/18/25 revealed the resident had a non-pressure neuropathic wound to the left inner ankle. The wound measured 1.5 centimeters (cm) in length by 1.6 cm in width, 0.2 cm in depth. The wound base was 50% epithelial and 50% granulation tissue with attached wound edges. The surrounding skin was fragile…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received appropriate catheter care. This affected two (#46 and #69) of two residents reviewed for catheter care. The facility identified seven residents with catheters. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 02/12/21. Diagnoses included chronic diastolic heart failure and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #46 had cognitive impairment and had an indwelling catheter. Review of the care plan last revised 02/27/22 revealed Resident #46 had an indwelling catheter for neurogenic bladder. Interventions included to secure catheter to the leg with security device. Review of the physician orders dated 05/15/24 revealed Foley catheter care every shift and as needed with soap and water. Secure straps if applicable, document output…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 48 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered per physician orders and further failed to ensure oxygen tubing was routinely changed. This affected two (Resident #12 and #18) of two residents reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility identified 11 residents who received oxygen therapy. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission of 07/19/17. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, atrial fibrillation, morbid obesity, and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #12 had intact cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the physician orders for Resident #12 dated 09/02/24 revealed an order for oxygen two to three liters ER minute (LPM) via nasal cannula continuous every shift with oxygenation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to monitor weights and vital signs before and after dialysis and maintain adequate communication with the outside dialysis center for Resident #66. This affected one (Resident #66) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified four residents receiving dialysis. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical records for Resident #66 revealed an admission date 10/16/24. Diagnosis included stage III kidney disease and hemodialysis. The medical record for November 2024, December 2024, and January 2025 revealed there were no routine vital signs, pre or post dialysis assessments were completed. There was no dialysis communication noted in the medical record either. Review of the physician order dated 02/06/25 revealed to assess the resident upon return from dialysis in the afternoon every Monday, Thursday and Saturday. Complete a pre-dialysis assessment prior to dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Interview on 02/25/25 at 1:24 P.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders resulting in a medication error rate which exceeded five percent (%). 27 opportunities were observed with two medication errors resulting in a 7.41% error rate. This affected two (Resident #57 and #69) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical records for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 01/07/25 with a diagnosis including type II diabetes mellitus (DM) with hyperglycemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 had intact cognition. Review of the physician order dated 02/10/25 revealed an order for Lantus SoloStar subcutaneous solution pen-injector 100 unit per milliliter (ml), inject 50 units subcutaneous twice daily for DM. (Lantus is a long-acting insulin used to control high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #57) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 01/07/25 with a diagnosis including type II diabetes mellitus (DM) with hyperglycemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 had intact cognition. Review of the physician order dated 02/10/25 revealed an order for Lantus SoloStar subcutaneous solution pen-injector 100 unit per milliliter (ml), inject 50 units subcutaneous twice daily for DM. (Lantus is a long-acting insulin used to control high blood sugar). The scheduled times for this medication were 7:30 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. Additional insulin orders with a start date of 02/13/25 was Insulin Aspart FlexPen 100 unit per ml solution…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure glucometers were properly disinfected, failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) by donning personal protective equipment (PPE) when completing wound care, and failed to change gloves properly during wound care This affected one (Resident #57) of four residents observed for medication administrations and one (#54) of two residents observed for wound care. The facility identified five residents receiving blood glucose monitoring on the unit. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 01/07/25 with a diagnosis including type II diabetes mellitus (DM) with hyperglycemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 had intact cognition. Review of the physician order dated 02/09/25 revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident's advance directives were readily available and communicated to the interdisciplinary team. This affected one (#100) of three residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date [DATE]. Diagnosis included dementia and stated Do Not Resuscitate- Comfort Care (DNR-CC). Under the tab advance directive, it stated DNR-CC dated [DATE]. There was no DNR uploaded in Resident #100's medical record. Review of the plan of care dated [DATE] for advance directive for DNR-CC. Interventions included obtain copies of advanced directives from resident/resident representative to have on file, dated provider order for code status and obtain the state specific DNR form. Review of the physician orders for [DATE] revealed no order related to resident's code status. Code status for DNR-CC was discontinued on [DATE]. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, record review and observation, the facility failed to ensure Resident #78's continuity of care was reviewed and implemented timely. This affected one (#78) of three residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date 06/28/23. Diagnoses included heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and lymphedema. Review of the after-visit summary for obstetrics and gynecology dated 10/24/24 revealed a medication order changed for megestrol (hormone therapy) 40 milligrams (mg) two tablets twice a day to four tablets twice a day. Review of the Nurse Practitioner (NP) #300 dated 10/25/24 revealed Resident #78 reported she had a procedure in the gynecology office that left her really sore. Resident #78 stated she has had some relief with ibuprofen. Resident #78 has history of abnormal uterine bleeding and had a uterine scraping and was waiting to hear back if she needs a dilation and curettage (D&C) (a surgical procedure that involves dilating the cervix and using…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty for eight consecutive hours each day, seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the daily staffing reports from 09/17/24 to 09/23/24 revealed the facility had no listed RN coverage for Saturday 09/21/24 and Sunday 09/22/24. An interview on 09/25/24 at 11:25 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified she did not work in the building on 09/21/24 and 09/22/24 and verified there was not a RN on duty in the building on Saturday 09/21/24 and on Sunday 09/22/24. The DON verified the facility should have an RN on duty every day, at least eight hours a day. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00157343.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to timely inform and allow the resident to participate in their treatment. This affected one (#100) of three residents reviewed participation of their treatment/care. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of 02/29/24. Diagnoses included osteoarthritis and chronic pain syndrome. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 had intact cognition. Resident #100 had pain occasionally in the last five days of the assessment reference period to which she received pain medication scheduled and as needed and did not receive non-medication interventions for pain. Review of Resident #100's August 2024 physician orders revealed an order for Oxycodone HCL (pain medication) oral tablet 10 milligrams (mg) administer one tablet by mouth two times a day for pain with a start date of 06/23/24. Oxycodone HCL was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely implement effective and individualized interventions to address a resident's behavioral health concerns. This affected one (Resident #200) of three residents reviewed for behavioral health services. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #200 revealed an admission date of 08/01/24. Diagnoses included alcohol dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia and blind. Resident #200 was discharged from the facility on 09/25/24. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #200 was unable to complete the interview a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score. He required substantial/maximal assistance from staff for toileting, personal hygiene, upper and lower body dressing. Resident #200 did not have rejection of care, no physical restraints, and did not exhibit physical, verbal or other behavior symptoms during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty for eight consecutive hours each day, seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 107. Findings include: Review of the daily staffing reports from 04/22/24 to 05/06/24 revealed the facility had no listed RN coverage for Saturday 04/27/24 and Saturday 05/04/24. An interview on 05/15/24 at 10:25 A.M. with Regional Director of Clinical Operations (RDCO) #250 verified the Director of Nursing was not working in the building on Saturday 04/27/24 or 05/04/24, nor was there any evidence any other RN worked on those two dates. RDCO #250 verified the facility should have an RN on duty every day, at least 8 hours a day. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00153688.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, policy review, and self reported incident (SRI) review, the facility failed to report, investigate and document allegations of resident-to-resident abuse. This affected six (Residents #100, #97, #98, #80, #83, and #101) of eight residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property. The facility census was 107. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of 07/14/20. Medical diagnoses included frontal lobe and executive function deficit following cerebrovascular accident (CVA, stroke), depression, schizoaffective disorder, and insomnia. Review of Resident #100's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment, dated 02/20/24 revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Resident #100 was assessed as not having any hallucinations, delusions, behaviors, or rejection of care. Resident #100 required supervision with transfers and mobility, and was noted to require substantial/maximum assistance with dressing and was dependent on staff for showering, toileting hygiene,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff and resident interview, policy review, and self-reported incidents (SRI) review, the facility failed to maintain accurate resident records. This affected four (Residents #84, #98, #101 and #100) of eight residents reviewed for accuracy of medical records. The facility census was 107. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 11/17/23. Medical diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance, anxiety, and schizophrenia. Resident #84 resided on the secured memory care unit. Review of Resident #84's interdisciplinary progress notes revealed a note dated 05/08/24 by Social Services Director (SSD) #300. The note referenced SSD #300 speaking to Resident #84 following an incident that occurred. The note revealed Resident #84 had no recollection of the event and no adverse psychosocial effects. Review of Resident #84's Treatment Administration Record (TAR), dated May 2024, revealed target behaviors staff was monitoring for included anxiety, refusing care, and refusing medications. Resident #84 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely and appropriate incontinence care was provided for a resident. This affected one (Resident #27) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 107. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 06/02/23. Medical diagnoses included mild dementia, chronic kidney disease, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #27's incontinence care plan, dated 06/13/23, revealed he was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Interventions included to check the resident for incontinence, wash, rinse, and dry perineum, and change clothing after incontinence episodes. Resident #27's activities of daily living care plan, dated 06/05/24, revealed Resident #27 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment, dated 04/25/24, revealed Resident #27 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #27 was dependent for toileting and was always incontinent of bowel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered treatments were applied as ordered. This affected two (Residents #45 and #50) of three residents reviewed for treatment administration. The facility census was 107. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 07/14/21. Medical diagnoses included venous insufficiency, chronic pain, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #45's physician's orders revealed an order dated 03/31/24 for Resident #45 to have compression wraps applied to both legs daily in the morning, remove at bedtime, for edema. Review of Resident #45's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for April 2024 revealed the wraps were not applied on 04/01/24, 04/13/24, 04/15/24, 04/22/24, and 04/26/24. Review of Resident #45's interdisciplinary progress notes revealed no documentation the resident had refused leg wraps on the above specified dates. During an observation on 05/06/24 at 7:54 A.M., Resident #45 was lying in bed. Both legs were visibly swollen and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered laboratory testing was completed timely. This affected one (Resident #100) of three residents reviewed for laboratory testing. The facility census was 107. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of 07/14/20. Medical diagnoses included frontal lobe and executive function deficit following cerebrovascular accident (CVA, stroke), depression, schizoaffective disorder, and insomnia. Resident #100 was discharged from the facility on 05/09/24. Review of Resident #100's care plan, revised on 02/22/24, revealed the resident used mood stabilizing medication related to schizoaffective disorder. Interventions included to monitor for side effects of medications, provide mood-stabilizing medications per medical provider's orders and provide psych consult and counseling services as needed. Review of Resident #100's physician's orders revealed an order dated 09/11/23 for Depakote 250 mg once daily in the morning, and 500 mg once daily in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medication administration was accurately documented in the medical record. This affected one (#14) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed admission to the facility occurred on 06/13/19 with diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, chronic pain, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of a comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was assessed as completely alert and oriented. Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed a physician order for the immunosuppressive medication to treat arthritis Humira subcutaneous (SQ) every 14 days. Review of Resident #14's medication administration record (MAR) for March 2024 revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #232 documented on the MAR that Resident #14 received his Humira injection on 03/27/24. There was no other documentation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of a self-reported incident, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from improper physician restraints. This affected one (#85) of three residents reviewed for restraints. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of Resident #85's medical record revealed admission to the facility occurred on 01/05/24 with medical diagnosis including subdural hematoma, alcohol abuse, stroke, seizures, and dementia. Review of a self-reported incident (SRI) dated 03/09/24 at 11:44 A.M. identified Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #214 observed LPN #220 place Resident #85 in a Broda chair (a type of chair use to help positioning) at the nurses' station with a gait belt strapped around her waistline. The investigation identified LPN #214 called the Director of Nursing (DON) to report the concern. The report identified the DON told LPN #214 to send LPN #220 home, remove Resident #85 from the Broda chair, and take the gait belt off. Interview with LPN #214 was completed on 04/02/24 at 7:39 A.M. The interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a safe and proper manner. This affected one (#17) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including subdural hemorrhage, kidney failure, and convulsions. Review of Resident #17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed with severe cognitive impairment. Observation on 04/02/24 at 9:31 A.M. in Resident #17's room revealed there was a cup full of medications sitting on the bedside stand. Continued observation revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #213 was overheard telling Resident #17 she would leave the medications for him to take later, and LPN #213 was then observed to moving the medication cart down the hallway away from the resident's room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure implementation of their abuse policy and obtain an employee background check was completed for Culinary Aide #423 prior to working with residents and failed to keep the background check log up to date. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility who can receive service from Culinary Aide #423. The facility census was 104. Findings include: 1.Review of Culinary Aide #423's personnel file revealed a hire date of 08/09/23. Further review revealed no evidence of the completion, or attempt to complete, a background check prior to employment. Review of the staff schedules from 08/01/23 through 02/27/24 revealed Culinary Aide #423 was assigned to work on 08/09/23, 08/15/23, 08/16/23, 08/18/23, 08/22/23, 08/23/23, 08/25/23, 08/30/23, 09/01/23, 09/05/23, 09/06/23, 09/08/23, 09/12/23, 09/13/23, 09/15/23, 09/19/23, 09/20/23, 09/22/23, 09/23/23, 09/26/23, 09/27/23, 09/29/23, 10/03/23, 10/04/23, 10/06/23, 10/08/23, 10/10/23, 10/11/23, 10/13/23, 10/17/23, 10/18/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and policy review, the facility failed to serve foods at the appropriate temperatures. The had the potential to affect all residents that resided in the facility as the facility identified all residents received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Interview on 02/21/24 at 12:40 P.M. with Resident #57 revealed the food is fair but usually cold. Interview on 02/21/24 at 12:55 P.M. with Resident #40 revealed the food delivered to his hall was usually last and the food was cold. Interview on 02/21/24 at 1:20 P.M. with Resident #43 revealed the food was not always hot. Interview on 02/21/24 at 3:17 P.M. with Resident #48 revealed sometimes the food was served cold. Observation of the lunch tray line on 02/22/24 at 11:56 A.M. with Culinary Director #490 and District Manager #111 revealed the lunch menu consisted of Italian sausage, Penne pasta, and spinach. Interview on 02/22/24 at 1:07 P.M. with Culinary Director #490 revealed they ran out of spinach for the lunch service. Culinary Director #490 stated broccoli was the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-04 · tag F0942 — widespread
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of personnel records, and staff interview the facility failed to provide training on the rights of the residents to the staff. This affected three (Licensed Practical Nurses [LPNs] #435 and #443, and State Tested Nursing Assistant [STNA] #520) of the five personnel records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 104 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Review of STNA #520 employee personnel file revealed a hire date of 12/11/23. The employee file contained no documented evidence of the rights of the residents training being provided to the employee prior to working in the facility. Review of LPN #435's employee personnel file revealed a hire date of 06/02/23. The employee file contained no documented evidence of the rights of the residents training being provided to the employee prior to working in the facility. Review of LPN #443's employee personnel file revealed a hire date of 07/07/23. The employee file contained no documented evidence of the rights of the residents training being provided to the employee prior to working…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-04 · tag F0943 — widespread
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of personnel records, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property training for staff. This affected three (Licensed Practical Nurses [LPNs] #435 and #443, and State Tested Nursing Assistant [STNA] #520) of the five personnel records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 104 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Review of STNA #520's personnel file revealed a hire date of 12/11/23. The employee file contained no documented evidence of abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property training being completed prior to working in the facility. Review of LPN #435's personnel file revealed a hire date of 06/02/23. The employee file contained no documented evidence of abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property training being completed prior to working in the facility. Review of LPN #443's personnel file revealed a hire date of 07/07/23. The employee file contained no documented evidence of abuse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-04 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician visits were completed as required. This affected four (Residents #01, #40, #43, and #200) of six residents reviewed for physician visits. The facility census was 104. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed an admission date of 12/05/23. Medical diagnoses included dementia, cellulitis, malnutrition, and venous insufficiency. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #01 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #01 was seen by the previous medical director, Medical Doctor (MD) #700 on 12/06/23. The record revealed Resident #01 had multiple visits by Nurse Practitioner (NP) #475 but did not contain evidence that Resident #01 had been seen by the new medical director, MD #750, or any other physician,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-04 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff, resident, and family interviews, record review, policy review, and review of a local police report, the facility failed to ensure Resident #200 was not unnecessarily discharged from the facility and failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation related to Resident #200's discharge was recorded in the resident's medical record. This affected one (Resident #200) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #200 revealed an admission date of 10/02/23 and a discharge date of 01/29/24. Medical diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), poly neuropathy, anemia, venous insufficiency, and lymphedema. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #200 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. He was recorded as having verbal and other behaviors not affecting others during one to three days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-01 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, review of food committee minutes, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure snacks were available in the evening and at bed time. This had the potential to affect all 96 residents. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Interview with [NAME] #800 on 10/23/23 at 9:11 A.M. confirmed residents receiving snacks on the second shift was an ongoing issue. [NAME] #800 stated she and the day shift staff pass snacks at 10:00 A.M., and set up the snack cooler for the second shift snack pass at 3:00 P.M. prior to leaving for the day. [NAME] #800 stated more often then not the snack cooler was not touched. [NAME] #800 stated she, the Dietary Manager, and the Administrator have been trying to resolve the issue for months with little success. Interview with the Administrator on 10/23/23 at 9:29 A.M. revealed she was aware of the afternoon snack passing issue. Interview with Registered Dietician (RD) #801 on 10/23/23 at 9:34 A.M. revealed she was aware of the afternoon snack passing issue. Interview with Resident #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medication storage observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure controlled substances and narcotic medication were disposed of in a timely manner. This affected four (#30, #88, #91, and #92) of four residents reviewed for disposition of controlled substances and narcotics upon discontinuation of orders or discharge. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Observation of the controlled substance drawer of the Whitney Way medication cart on 10/31/23 at 8:12 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 revealed Resident #88 had 55 pills of the nerve pain medication Lyrica in 25 milligram (mg) doses located in the drawer. Interview with LPN #200 during the observation on 10/31/23 at 8:12 A.M. verified Resident #88's Lyrica in the medication cart, and stated the Director of Nursing (DON) and unit managers are the only staff members permitted to remove a resident's controlled medications from the medication carts when the orders are discontinued or the resident discharges from the facility. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, facility staff interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment for one (Residents #10) of seven residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included paraplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sepsis, pressure ulcer, acute kidney failure, complications of colostomy, and neurogenic bladder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had no memory problems and was independent with his daily decision making. Resident #10 dad verbal behaviors directed toward others one to three days of the review period. Resident #10 required set up assist with eating and oral hygiene, supervision or touching assistance for upper body dressing, personal hygiene and sit to lying mobility, partial moderate assistance for toileting, rolling and chair to bed transfer, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain the proper position of a urinary catheter drainage bag for one (Resident #10) of one reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included paraplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sepsis, pressure ulcer, acute kidney failure, complications of colostomy, neurogenic bladder, and muscle spasms. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had no memory problems and was independent with his daily decision making. The resident had verbal behaviors directed toward others one to three days of the review period. Resident #10 required set up assist with eating and oral hygiene, supervision or touching assistance for upper body dressing, personal hygiene and sit to lying mobility, partial moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to serve food at a safe and palatable temperature. This had the potential to affect all 101 residents residing in the facility who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Interviews on 09/26/22 at 9:30 A.M to 12:30 P.M. with Residents #5, #11, #86, and #92 revealed the food was not served at a palpable temperature. Interview on 09/28/22 at 11:07 A.M. with [NAME] #304 revealed the food temperatures on the steam table were obtained at 11:10 A.M. The hot dogs were held at 160 Fahrenheit (F), zucchini at 150 F and bake beans at 190 F. On 09/28/22 at 11:15 A.M., a test tray was requested. The cart with test tray left the kitchen at 12:26 P.M., arrived on the unit at 12:28 P.M., and the last tray was served at 12:46 P.M. Review of a sample tray on 09/28/22 at 12:47 P.M., after all the room trays were served to the residents, revealed the hot food was not served at a palatable temperature. The food temperatures on the test tray was obtained with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store dishware appropriately for food service safety and follow the facility's warewashing procedures. This had the potential to affect all 101 residents in the facility who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: During the initial observation on 09/26/22 at 10:40 A.M. of kitchen revealed three trays of cups, one tray of fruit bowls, and three trays of bowls were stacked and put away wet. There were three trays with cups and bowls that had black speckles on them. Interview on 09/26/10:40 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #324 revealed washware were to be air dried prior to stacking on trays to be put away. DM #324 verified the cups, bowls, and fruit cups were put away wet and should be stored on clean trays. Follow up observation on 09/28/22 at 11:12 A.M. of the kitchen revealed there were bowls and cups stored wet, after being cleaned. Interview on 09/28/22 at 11:15 A.M. with DM #324 verified the trays of cups and bowls were stacked and put away wet. Review of the facility's policy titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, review of the facility policy, and family and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a resident's privacy during incontinence care. This affected one (Resident #5) of six residents observed for personal care. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission to the facility occurred on 08/07/20. Diagnoses included liver cirrhosis, insomnia and high blood pressure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was alert with impairment of cognition. Resident #5 required assistance of staff with activities of daily living. Interview with Resident #5's family member on 09/27/22 at 8:31 A.M. revealed he has come to the facility to visit and was upset to see Resident #5 was naked with no privacy curtain pulled in his room between the beds or door closed to the hallway. Resident #5's family stated Resident #5 had a roommate. Observation of Resident #5 on 09/27/22 at 1:40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-30 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide written notification to a resident and/or resident representative and to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for the reason for a residents' transfer or discharge from the facility. This affected one (Resident #15) of two residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission to the facility occurred on 08/17/18. Diagnoses included anemia, chronic pain, and bariatric surgery. Resident #15 required transfer to the hospital from [DATE] through 08/09/22 and again on 09/19/22 through 09/23/22. There was no evidence in the medical record that Resident #15 and/or his representative were provided a written notification of the reason for the hospital transfers. Interview with Social Services Director (SSD) #340 on 09/28/22 at 11:03 A.M. stated she was new to her position and does not currently have a system in place to complete the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 07/19/17. Diagnoses included acute gastroenteropathy, type II diabetes mellitus, heart failure, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Interview on 09/26/22 at 11:36 A.M. with Resident #56 revealed he would like to participate in his care plan meetings. Interview 09/27/22 at 10:59 A.M. with Social Service Designee (SSD) #340 confirmed she was only doing care plan meetings on admission and had no idea she should be doing the meetings on a quarterly basis. Review of the facility's policy titled Plan of Care Overview, revised 07/26/18, revealed the facility will review care plans quarterly and schedule meeting to accommodate resident's representative that may include conference calls, video conference sessions, or live sessions. 2. Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed Resident #43 was admitted to this facility on 04/04/22. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbances, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-30 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facility policy, observation, and family, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure an ambulation program was established for two (Resident #5 and #38) of three residents reviewed for therapy discharge. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission to the facility occurred on 08/07/20. Diagnoses included liver cirrhosis, dementia, high blood pressure, insomnia, and fractured femur. Review of Resident #5's physical therapy (PT) Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed to maintain current level of performance and in order to prevent decline, a development of and instruction for a Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) in ambulation has been completed with the interdisciplinary team (IDT) for Resident #5. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed no RNP for ambulation had been established following PT discharge on [DATE]. Interview with Resident #5's family member on 09/27/22 at 8:31…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interview, review of the facility policy, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required limited assistance from staff with activities of daily living, received adequate and timely assistance with personal hygiene. This affected one (Resident #2) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility identified 99 residents required assistance from staff for bathing and 101 residents required assistance from staff with dressing. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission dated of 03/15/22. Diagnoses included dementia, depression, and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had impaired cognition and required one person staff assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the physician orders for September 2022 revealed Resident #2 required extensive assistance of one staff for personal hygiene. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received timely treatment and care for a resident exhibiting signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling catheter received routine catheter care as physician ordered. This affected one (Resident #53) of six residents reviewed for quality of care and affected one (Resident #40) of two residents reviewed for catheter care. The facility identified 13 residents with an indwelling or external catheter. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety, depression, a history of urinary tract infection (UTI) and general weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 had mild cognitive impairment and was always continent. Review of the physician order dated 09/17/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of facility anti-psychotic dose reduction/elimination records, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not receiving an anti-psychotic medication without indication of continued use. This affected one (Resident #5) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility identified 20 residents who receive anti-psychotic medications. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date to the facility occurred on 08/07/20. Diagnoses included liver cirrhosis, dementia, and delusional disorder. Review of the physician orders dated 03/11/22 revealed Resident #5 was placed on Risperdal (anti-psychotic medication) on 03/11/22. Review of the facility's psychotropic medication evaluation dated 09/14/22 for Resident #5 revealed this was a semi-annual gradual dose reduction (GDR) attempt. The GDR evaluation revealed Resident #5 was appropriate for an attempt. A physician order was obtained to hold Resident #5's Risperdal for one week and if no changes then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-30 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's urine sample for a urine analysis and culture and sensitivity was obtained per the physician's orders. This affected one (Resident #93) of four residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of Resident #93's medical record revealed Resident #93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included urinary tract infection (UTI), calculus of ureter, sepsis, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #93 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #93 required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and personal hygiene. Review of the physician orders dated 09/06/22 revealed Resident #93 had an order for a complete blood panel and urine sample for analysis, culture and sensitivity. Review of the lab results revealed no urine culture was submitted as ordered.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-30 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary antibiotic use. This affected one (Resident #5) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date to the facility occurred on 08/07/20. Diagnoses included liver cirrhosis, dementia, and delusional disorder. The record revealed a scheduled urinalysis test was ordered every six months. The urinalysis was completed on 09/07/22. The record revealed no evidence a culture and sensitivity (C&S) was completed. The C&S results would identify if a specific bacteria and proper antibiotic that would be used to treat a urinary tract infection. Review of Resident #5's urinalysis results dated 09/07/22 revealed none seen for bacteria in the urinalysis test. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) for September 2022 revealed Resident #5 was administered Bactrim DS (antibiotic) 800/160 milligrams (mg) twice a day from 09/07/22 through 09/14/22, The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were updated. This affected three residents (#70, #79, and #83) of 25 residents revealed for plans of care. The facility census was 125. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including disorders of bladder, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. Review of Resident #79's physician order dated 09/29/19 revealed an order for one liter of sodium chloride 0.9% intravenously (IV) every shift every seven days. There was no evidence a care plan had been developed for the use of the resident's IV fluids. Interview on 10/01/19 at 3:41 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #65 verified Resident #79's IV fluids were not addressed in a plan of care. 2. Review of Resident #83's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/14/19 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and fracture of cervical vertebra. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were maintained secured. This had the potential to affect 18 residents (#10, #12, #13, #23, #26, #40, #47, #49, #75, #83, #91, #92, #94, #99, #112, #116, #120 and #174) whom the facility identified as confused and mobile. The facility census was 125. Findings include: 1. Observation of the medication administration on 10/01/19 at 7:24 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #29 revealed after she obtained all of Resident #103's medications she entered the resident's room and did not lock or secure the medication cart. The RN was in Resident #103's room for approximately five minutes. Interview with RN#29 confirmed she did not secure the medication cart prior to entering Resident #103's room. 2. Observation of the medication administration on 10/01/19 at 7:40 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #43 revealed the LPN was administering medications to Resident #15, on Unit #2. LPN #43 obtained all medications for Resident #15 and entered Resident #15's room, while leaving the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for two residents (#9 and #66) of five reviewed for falls. The facility census was 125. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; peripheral vascular disease, difficulty in walking, and type II diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had mild cognitive impairment. The resident had one fall since admission resulting in no injuries and required extensive assistance with two persons for transfers. Review of Resident #9's progress notes dated 09/22/19 revealed the resident had a fall and a new intervention included to add a dycem (a non-slip material) to the resident's hoyer lift sling prior to transferring the resident. Review of Resident #9's care plan revised on 9/23/19 revealed the resident was at risk for falls due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was completed as ordered for one resident (#69) of two reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 125. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of the brain (cancer), seizures and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #69's current physician order summary revealed the resident was to have oxygen at a flow rate of 3 liters per minute, every shift since 11/11/18. On 09/30/19 at 2:41 P.M. observation of Resident #69 revealed her to have continuous oxygen through a nasal cannula at a flow rate of 1.5 liters. On 10/02/19 at 02:04 P.M. observation and interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #44 of Resident #69 revealed the resident's oxygen was at a flow rate of 1.5 liters. LPN #44…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of antibiotic stewardship policy, the facility failed to ensure a pharmacy recommendation was acted upon to discontinue a medication for one resident (#25 of five reveiwed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 125. Findings include: Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, major depression and chronic pain. The resident was noted to be cognitively intact. There was no evidence the resident had a significant history of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Review of Resident #25 progress notes revealed she was having some painful urination on 07/05/19 and was ordered a urine culture and sensitivity testing. On 07/07/19 the culture returned and was identified positive growing less than 100,000 colony forming units (cfu/ml). The record identified at that time Resident #25 was placed on the prophylactic antibiotic. There was not evidence the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-03 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and staff interview, the facility failed to communicate a resident's behavior to hospice care takers. This affected one resident (#59) of one reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 125. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dementia, depression and heart disease. The resident was noted to be receiving hospice services as of 08/06/19. Review of Resident #59's current care plan revealed the resident was receiving hospice services and in the event the resident experienced any changes in conditions to include increased behaviors; hospice was to be notified. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #59's progress notes from 08/09/19 to 10/01/19 revealed 19 individual nurses' notes were documented between the hours of 10:00 P.M. to 06:00 A.M. which revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-02-27 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure annual performance evaluations were completed as required for certified nursing assistants (CNAs). This affected three of three CNAs reviewed for annual performance evaluations. This had the potential to affect all 96 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for CNA #302 revealed a hire date of 08/10/22. The employee's personnel file revealed no annual performance evaluation had been completed for 2024. Review of the personnel file for CNA #304 revealed a hire date of 11/19/19. The employee's personnel file revealed no annual performance evaluation had been completed for 2024. Review of the personnel file for CNA/Medication technician (MT) #360 revealed a hire date of 01/05/22. The employee's personnel file revealed no annual performance evaluation had been completed for 2024. On 02/25/25 at 8:20 A.M. with Human Resource Director (HR) #307 verified no 2024 annual performance evaluation had been completed for CNA #302, CNA #304, and CNA/MT #360.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-04-11 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain daily posted nurse staffing data as required. This had the potential to affect all 104 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Observation of the front door of the facility on 04/02/24 at 1:15 P.M. revealed a message board with the daily posted nurse staffing data dated 04/01/24 and 04/02/24. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 04/02/24 at 1:39 P.M. a request was made to review the last two weeks of the facility's daily nurse staffing posting. The DON confirmed the facility had been throwing away the daily posted nurse staffing data and not keeping them as required. Review of the facility policy titled, Nurse Staffing Information, identified the facility will post the daily staffing information for public viewing and maintain the data for a minimum of 18 months. This deficiency was an incidental finding related to allegations contained in Master Complaint Number OH00152382 and Complaint Number OH00151892.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$232,204 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $39,130 — penalty dated 2024-09-25
  • $193,074 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-03 for 122 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH 3 of 5Charleston Healthcare CenterCharleston, WV

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
THIRD OPTION OP CO., LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2020
OPTION HOLDINGS III, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2020
THE STEPHEN L. ROSEDALE 2012 SPOUSAL TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2003
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
STOLTZ, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2012
WAYNE, MATTHEWIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2012
WILHEIM, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2012
MIDLAND (OHIO) MANAGEMENT, CO., LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/25/2025
GROVES, DONNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
WILFONG, MELISSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/08/2024
YOUNG, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
ODENTHAL, RICHARDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2025
C R STOLTZ II LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2003
C.R. STOLTZ IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2003
I. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2003
R.S. WILHEIM IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2003
RONALD S WILHEIM 2012 SPOUSAL TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2003
ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2003
RRW, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2003
S.L. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2003
WILHEIM FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2003

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 3%Other / private 21%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$304per resident / day
operating cost
$9,248per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$281per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365284. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next