Wedgewood Healthcare Center
101 Potters Ln, Clarksville, IN 47129 · For profit - Corporation · 124 certified beds · (812) 948-0808 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2023
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.9% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.3% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 15.6% | 25.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 3.9% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.1% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.7% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.0% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.4% | 23.3% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.7% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.4% | 79.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.6% | 22.2% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.2% | 10.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.82 | 1.61 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.72 | 1.44 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.6%CMS range 24.0–54.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 7.1–16.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.0–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.10 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 97.7 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-06-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician's orders were followed to schedule a paracentesis for a resident with ascites and jaundice which resulted in the unstable hospitalization which was followed by the death of Resident C for 1 of 32 residents reviewed for Quality of Care. (Resident B) The Immediate Jeopardy began on 9/30/22 when facility staff failed to schedule an appointment as ordered for Resident C to have a paracentesis (procedure to remove excess fluid buildup from the abdomen) procedure performed to relieve the resident's ascites (collection of fluid in the abdomen). The Executive Director (ED), Director of Nurses (DON) and Regional Director of Clinical Operations (RDCO) were notified of the immediate jeopardy at 12:51 p.m. on 6/20/23. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 6/21/23, but noncompliance remained at the lower scope and severity level of isolated, no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration assessment was in place for a resident (Resident F) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights. Findings include:During an observation on 11/17/25 at 9:35 a.m., the following was observed in Resident F's room:-a medication cup with a oval white pill -an Albuterol hand-held inhaler-an Anora hand-held inhaler During an interview, on 11/17/25 at 9:37 a.m., Resident F indicated the medication in the cup was his Lasix (diuretic) from yesterday that he had forgotten to take. The doctor said it was okay for him to have the rescue inhalers at bedside. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 11/17/25 at 10:05 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension and anxiety. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/25/25, indicated the resident's cognition was intact. The resident's November medication administration record indicated Resident F received the following medications:-Anoro…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. (Resident 40)Findings include:During an interview with Resident 40, on 9/22/25 at 11:08 a.m., she indicated she wanted to return home to her apartment and was just waiting on a call that one had opened. She had been planning to return home since she came into the facility, but had a few setbacks that initially caused her uncertainty.The clinical record for Resident 40 was reviewed on 9/24/25 at 9:10 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, generalized anxiety disorder, emphysema, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.A care plan, dated 9/26/22, indicated the resident wished to be discharged to her prior assisted living facility. The interventions included, but were not limited to, establish a pre-discharge plan. Evaluate her progress and revise plan as needed.The Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 4/9/25, indicated the resident was alert and oriented, she had no mood or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure (ADL) Activities of Daily Living care, related to laundry and bowel and bladder was provided for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Residents 41) Findings include:During an observation, on 9/22/25 at 2:00 p.m., Resident 41 had a urinal sitting on his bedside dresser three fourths full of straw-colored urine. The resident indicated that the urinal was there from night shift and no one had emptied it. The resident's bed had food debris and brown spots on his sheets. The resident's chair had a pile of clothing laying in it, and he indicated staff were supposed to take his clothes to the laundry, but the clothes had been in the chair for several days. During an observation, on 9/25/25 at 10:30 a.m., the resident's urinal was sitting on his bedside dresser half full of urine. He indicated that it was his urinal he used during the night. His dirty clothes were still in his chair. During an observation, on 9/25/25 at 2:00 p.m., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided proper management of the urinary catheter drainage system related to lack of catheter care orders, tubing and bag on floor, and lack of securement device for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. (Resident 4)Findings include:During an observation, on 9/22/25 at 1:00 p.m., the resident was sitting in his recliner. The urinary catheter drainage system had a dignity bag covering the drainage bag, but the tubing was lying on the floor.During an observation, on 9/23/25 at 9:02 a.m., Resident 4 was in his room asleep in his recliner. The urinary tubing of the drainage system was compressed between the resident's legs. The tubing had backed up with dark yellow urine and sediment. A securement device was not secured to either of the resident's legsDuring an observation of catheter care, on 9/25/25 at 10:15 a.m., the resident's catheter care was completed and a securement device was not secured to either…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure narcotics were administered and documented within the appropriate timeframe for the review of 1 of 32 residents reviewed for pharmacy procedures. (Resident 6) Findings include: During an observation on 9/24/25 at 10:17 a.m., of the 500 Hall Medication Cart, the following concerns were identified: Resident 6's Controlled Drug Administration Record sheet indicated the 0.5 milligram (mg) lorazepam tablet had 13 tablets left on sheet. The medication card had 12 tablets left. The lorazepam was last signed out on 9/24/25 at 4:00 a.m., by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 10. The record for Resident 6 was reviewed on 9/25/25 at 1:25 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, atrial fibrillation, upper abdominal pain, heart failure, alcohol use, depression, and anxiety. The care plan, dated 9/10/25, indicated Resident 6 used anti-anxiety medication for anxiety disorder. The interventions included, but were not limited to, consult with the pharmacy or medical provider to consider a dosage reduction when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure narcotics were disposed of in a timely manner and document the administration of the narcotic in the Controlled Drug Administration Record sheet for 2 of 32 residents reviewed for narcotic medication storage. (Residents 52 and 6) Findings include:1.During an observation, on [DATE] at 10:17 a.m., of the 500 Hall Medication Cart the following concerns were identified: Resident 52's lorazepam tablet was last administered on [DATE]. The medication was still in the narcotic drawer of the medication cart. Resident 52's lorazepam liquid was last administered on [DATE]. The medication was still in the narcotic drawer of the medication cart. Resident 52's morphine tablet was last administered on [DATE]. The medication was still in the narcotic drawer of the medication cart. The record for Resident 52 was reviewed on [DATE] at 2:00 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bronchus or lung cancer, chronic obstructive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure indwelling urethral catheter orders were in place for a resident with an indwelling urethral catheter for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. (Resident D) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 11/13/24 at 2:20 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, indwelling urethral catheter; and obstructive and reflux uropathy. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/10/24, indicated the resident had an indwelling catheter. Review of the census record for Resident D indicated he was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an indwelling urethral catheter. On 11/13/24 at 2:05 p.m., Resident D was observed in his room with an indwelling urethral catheter in place. The care plan, dated 8/6/24, indicated the resident had an indwelling catheter related to obstructive uropathy. The interventions included, but were not limited to, change the catheter per the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication administration record accurately reflected the administration on pain medication for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medical records. (Resident C) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 11/13/24 at 10:47 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteomyelitis and stage 4 (wound that extends to muscle, tendon or bone) pressure ulcer to the sacrum. The physician's order, dated 8/21/24, indicated the resident was to receive Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) HCl (hydrochloride) 10 mg (milligrams) every 4 hour as needed for pain. Review of the September 2024 controlled drug administration record indicated the pain medication was signed as given 90 times during the month. Review of the September 2024 medication administration record indicated the pain medication was documented as administered 13 times during the month. Review of the October 2024 controlled drug administration record indicated the pain medication was signed as given 38 times to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-12 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promptly resolve the grievances and recommendations made by the Resident Council during 12 of 12 meetings and 5 of 7 Food Committee meetings reviewed in that the same issues were being reported as continuing problems. Findings include: 1. The Resident Council meeting, held on 7/25/23, indicated the following concerns were not addressed by the responsible department or resolved: - Clean rooms more. - Better and more snacks for all the halls as residents didn't know where they went - Be informed about medication changes. - Problem with medications on the 500 Hall. - Asked for help twice and did not get it. On 7/25/23, the Director of Nursing (DON) addressed the issue residents were having in getting their showers. No other concerns were addressed. 2. The Resident Council meeting, held on 8/22/23, indicated the following concerns were not addressed by the responsible department or resolved: - Safety concerns - Bed changes not always occurring. - Need to order medications before they ran out. - Wheelchairs and walkers - who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner for 4 of 4 kitchen observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 97 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings include: 1. During the initial tour of the kitchen, on 8/5/24 at 9:30 a.m., while accompanied by the Dietary Manager and the Regional Dietary Manager, the following concerns were observed: In the Dry Storage Room the following was observed: - Three (3) of three (3) food shelves had crumbs under them - raisin bran. pieces of paper and spaghetti noodles. - A small blue cup was in the large sugar bin - (the Regional Dietary Manager indicated this was not supposed to be left in there and removed it). - The top of the large seasoning storage bin was heavily soiled with brown drips and food particles on it and down the sides. In the Walk in freezer the following was observed: - There was a 2 foot by 2 foot area of ice under the milk crates below the condenser unit, which was approximately 3/4 inch thick. Two cup…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure smoking materials were secured in a locked area when not in use for 5 of 25 smokers reviewed for accidents hazards. (Residents 6, 46, 54, 72, and 86) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 8/9/24 at 10:00 a.m., Resident 6 had her cigarettes and lighter laying on the bedside table. The resident was sound asleep sitting up in her wheelchair. During am observation on 8/9/24 at 1:00 p.m., Resident 6 had her cigarettes and lighter laying on her bedside table. She had just finished eating her lunch. During an interview on 8/11/24 at 12:55 p.m., Resident 6 indicated she did not lock up her lighter. She indicated the staff trust me with my lighter When she left her room, she would hide her lighter and cigarettes underneath her left leg where no one could see them. During an observation on 8/12/24 at 8:30 a.m., Resident 6 had her cigarette lighter laying on her bedside table. 2. During an interview on 8/9/24 at 1:00 p.m., Resident 54 indicated she had her cigarettes and lighter in her purse. She would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dialysis access site was monitored and the physician was notified for 1 of 2 resident reviewed for dialysis. (Resident 51) Findings Include: The record for Resident 51 was reviewed on 8/8/24 at 10:56 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, peripheral vascular angioplasty with implants and grafts, anemia in chronic kidney disease, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and acute kidney failure.c The physician orders, dated 4/15/24,indicated staff were to monitor the dialysis site for signs and symptoms of infection, monitor the graft site for signs and symptoms of infection, and monitor for thrill and bruit every shift. The physician's order, dated 4/25/24, indicated the resident was to receive hemodialysis every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. The Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 5/10/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. , The care plan, initiated on 4/16/24 and revised on 8/7/24 indicated, Resident 51 was currently on dialysis therapy. He…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for proper procedures during 2 of 2 observations of incontinence care related to infection control. (Resident 196) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 196 was reviewed on 8/7/24 at 11:00 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, encephalopathy, acute kidney failure, dementia, anxiety disorder, intellectual disabilities, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, lack of coordination, and cognitive communication deficit. The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 7/26/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. He was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The care plan, dated 8/1/24, indicated the resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder due to impaired cognition and impaired mobility. The interventions, dated 8/1/24, indicated for staff to apply barrier creams as needed, check the resident for incontinence., wash, rinse, and dry the perineum. During an observation of wound care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow medication administration parameters (Residents B, D and H); obtain blood pressure as ordered for 7 days (Resident F); and complete non-pressure wound treatments as ordered (Residents B and D) for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: 1.a. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 7/24/24 at 1:35 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes, hypertension, and morbid obesity. The care plan, dated 10/27/23, indicated the resident had hypertension (high blood pressure) and staff were to administer the resident's medications as ordered by the medical provider. The physician's order, dated 11/21/23, indicated the resident was to receive Carvedilol 12.5 mg (milligrams) twice daily at 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. for hypertension. Staff were to hold the resident's medication for a SBP (systolic blood pressure) less than 110 or a pulse less than 60. The resident's May and June 2024 MAR (medication administration record) indicated the following: - On 5/06/24 at 8:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Indwelling catheter care was completed for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Indwelling catheters. (Resident E) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 7/24/24 at 3:03 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, sacral region pressure ulcer, stage 4 (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle). The care plan, dated 2/15/23, indicated the resident required a condom catheter due to impaired skin integrity and staff were to provide catheter care every shift. The March 2024 treatment administration record (TAR) indicated staff were to cleanse the resident's condom catheter with soap and water every shift and to change the drainage bag weekly on Mondays. The resident's March 2024 TAR indicated the resident's condom catheter care was not completed on the following dates and shifts: - 3/01/24 - 3/02/24 on day shift - 3/04/24 on night shift - 3/05/24 on day shift - 3/07/24 on day shift - 3/10/24 on day shift - 3/11/24 on day and night shift - 3/13/24 on night…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a staff member followed infection control practices for 1 of 5 observations related to infection control. ( CNA 4) Findings include: During an observation on 7/23/24 at 8:13 p.m., CNA (Certified Nursing Aide) 4 was observed to exit a resident's room wearing gloves and carrying a soiled brief in one gloved had and a soiled pair of pants in the other. During an interview on 7/26/24 at 12:34 p.m., CNA 5 indicated after resident care was provided, soiled briefs should be placed in a bag and soiled clothing in a separate bag. Soiled gloves should have been removed prior to exiting the resident's room and all soiled clothing should be in a bag. The bagged items should then be placed in the soiled utility room. On 7/25/24 at 1:48 p.m., the Regional Director of Clinical Operations provided a current copy of the document titled Infection Prevention Program effective 3/9/2000. It included, but was not limited to, Policy .It is the policy of this facility to provide resident centered care .Residents have the right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident that self-administered medications was appropriately assessed for self-administration for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident E) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 3/20/24 at 1:30 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteoarthritis, morbid obesity, congestive heart failure, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, depression, and hypertension. Review of the March 2024 physician's orders indicated the resident was to receive the following medications every morning: -Aspirin 81 mg (milligrams) chewable for heart health -Carvedilol 3.125 mg twice daily for hypertension -Clopidogrel Bisulfate 75 mg daily for heart health -Ergocalciferol 1.25 mg daily for supplement -Gabapentin 100 mg twice daily for health maintenance -Lexapro 10 mg daily for depression On 3/20/24 at 11:40 a.m., Resident E was observed resting in bed in her room. On the resident's bedside table was a medication cup with 6 unidentified medications.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's (Resident B) representative was provided a bed hold notification information, in a timely manner, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transfer/discharge. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 9/15/23 at 10:25 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, adjustment disorder, post traumatic stress disorder, schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder. The progress note, dated 8/16/23 at 9:16 a.m., indicated the resident was sent to a psychiatric hospital related to behaviors towards staff. Review of the bed hold authorization form indicated Resident B's representative was not informed related to the bed hold policy until 9/6/23 which was three weeks after his discharge to the hospital. During an interview on 9/15/23 at 10:51 a.m., the complainant indicated she was notified of the bed hold authorization on 9/6/23. During an interview on 9/15/23 at 12:41 p.m., the Admissions Coordinator indicated the bed hold authorization got missed. On 9/15/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-21 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promptly resolve the grievances and recommendations made by the Resident Council during 9 of 12 meetings and 7 of 11 complaint logs reviewed where the same issues were being reported as continuing problems. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 106 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 6/19/23 at 2:00 p.m., the Resident Council minutes for the months of July 2022 through June 2023 were reviewed after permission was obtained by the Resident Council President. The review of the Resident Council minutes indicated on 7/26/22 the residents' had the following concerns: - Staff were not distributing trays in a timely manner. - Staff were not reminding people on their shower days and/or putting them off until too late. - Staff were not offering to change bed linens. No response to these concerns could be located. The review of the Resident Council minutes indicated on 11/22/22 the residents' had the following concerns: - Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) were rude when they answered call lights. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen concentrator filters were maintained for 9 of 20 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Residents 18, 15, D, 99, 78, 66, 65, 6, and 40) Findings include: 1. During the initial tour on 6/14/23 at 9:32 a.m., Resident 18's oxygen concentrator filter was completely coated with a white powdery substance. The record for Resident 18 was reviewed on 6/21/23 at 3:12 p.m. The diagnoses included but were not limited to COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), chronic congestive heart failure, and automatic cardiac defibrillator. The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 5/19/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The care plan, dated 5/17/23 and last revised on 6/15/23, indicated the resident had COPD with shortness of breath while lying flat. She required oxygen at 2 L related to her disease process. The interventions, dated 6/15/23, included, but was not limited to, provide oxygen therapy as ordered. Change tubing per facility policy. The physician's orders, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner for 3 of 3 kitchen observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 106 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 6/14/23 at 9:12 a.m., the following concerns were observed: - There was heavy black grime under the dishwasher, on the pipes and going up the walls. There were also two dirty cups and two forks on the floor under the dishwasher. - There was grime under the floor beneath the deep fryer and the steam and hold oven. - There was heavy grease build up to the wall and floor behind and under the deep-fryer and oven as well as on the sides of the grill. - There was a broken white dish and copious amounts of food debris under the stove and deep fryer, including several French fries, tater tots, and scraps of aluminum foil. - There was a heavy black buildup of residue on the splatter guard of the stove. - There was a heavy accumulation of grease, approximately 1 half…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a blood sugar levels over 400 mg/dL for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Notification of Change. (Resident 79) Findings include: The record for Resident 79 was reviewed on 6/15/23 at 11:44 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, chronic kidney disease stage 3, and acute kidney failure. The Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 3/30/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The care plan, dated 8/8/22 and last revised on 10/10/22, indicated the resident had Diabetes Mellitus and was non-compliant with diet, placing him at risk for complications related to high blood glucose. The interventions included, but were not limited to, administer insulin injections per orders and report any abnormal findings to the medical provider. The physician order, dated 1/19/23, indicated staff were to administer the resident's insulin lispro subcutaneously with meals by pen-injector as per sliding scale: If the resident's blood sugar was 151 to 200 they were to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the heating and air units were in good working condition for a comfortable temperature for 2 of 106 resident residing in the facility. (Residents E and D) Finding include: During and observation on 6/14/23 at 9:55 p.m., the HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) unit was set to the fan only setting, upon entrance into Residents E and D's room. The room was observed to feel warm. During an interview on 6/14/23 at 9:55 a.m., Resident E, indicated the air conditioning unit was not functioning properly. The fan only button was on and was blowing warm air. If the cool setting was on, it would only run for 10 minutes or so and then shut off. The E9 (error) lighted setting would appear in the temperature screen. The HVAC unit didn't work even though it was new. The Maintenance Director informed Resident E that he couldn't do anything about it. During an interview on 6/15/23 at 10:44 a.m., Resident E indicated the HVAC unit was out and had been this way for a few months. Her roommate got hot…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of verbal abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident 58) Findings include: The record for Resident 58 was reviewed on 6/15/23 at 12:53 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, aphasia following cerebral infarction, dysphasia following cerebral infarction, dementia. The care plan, dated 5/1/22, indicated the resident had a self-care performance deficit and required assistance of 2 staff members with toileting and 1 staff member with personal hygiene. The record for Resident 12 was reviewed on 6/20/23 at 9:24 a.m. The Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 5/9/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The statement of Resident 12 (Resident 58's roommate), dated 5/25/23, indicated early that morning during care, two aides came in to provide care to his roommate, Resident 58. Resident 58 was resistive to care and the male aide CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 16 said to the resident . We aren't putting up with your s* tonight, you're going to get changed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure reducing boots were in place as ordered for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. (Resident 22) Findings include: The record for Resident 22 was reviewed on 6/19/23 at 8:58 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, contracture of unspecified joint, left hip, and left knee, osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral, and sacrococcygeal region, cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, pressure ulcer of the hip, and contracture of multiple sites both upper and lower extremities. The physician's order, dated 10/28/22, indicated the resident was to wear heel boots to his bilateral feet while in bed every shift for prevention. The physician's order, dated 10/28/22, indicated staff were to encourage the resident to float heels while in bed as tolerated every shift for preventative measure. The care plan, initiated on 10/18/22, indicated the resident had impaired skin integrity and was admitted with stage 3 pressure wound to his left hip and was at risk for altered skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 22) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 22 was reviewed on 6/19/23 at 8:58 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, contracture of unspecified joint, left hip, and left knee, osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral, and sacrococcygeal region, cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, pressure ulcer of hip, and contracture of multiple sites both upper and lower extremities. The care plan, dated 10/18/22, indicated the resident was at risk for falls related to gait and balance problems, impaired cognition, incontinence, medication, weakness, hemiplegia, and schizophrenia. The interventions, initiated on 10/18/22, indicated staff were to place the resident's call bell within reach, remind the resident to call for assistance, and personal items within reach. The nurse's note, dated 1/28/23 at 3:43 p.m., indicated the resident fell out of bed. He was moving around a lot and trying to fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper maintenance of a catheter and drainage system off the floor for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. (Resident 57) Findings include: The record for Resident 57 was reviewed on 6/16/23 at 8:16 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, urinary tract infection, ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase) resistance, acute cystitis, obstructive uropathy, acute kidney failure, and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms. The nurse's note, dated 6/21/22 at 3:20 p.m., indicated the resident was on an antibiotic for ESBL of his urine. The nurse's note, dated 9/19/22 at 7:33 p.m., indicated the resident was sent to the hospital and returned three days later with a diagnosis of a UTI (urinary tract infection) and was on IV (intravenous) antibiotics. He had a urinary catheter in place draining clear yellow urine. The Nurse Practitioner's (NP) note, dated 10/21/22 at 1:24 p.m., indicated the resident presented with dysuria. It was described as aching and burning.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-21 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Social Services followed up on a resident's psychosocial well-being and care planned the behavior after an allegation of sexual inappropriateness was made. This deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Social Services. (Resident 99) Finding includes: The Reportable to State Incident, dated 4/27/23 at 3:01 a.m., indicated the resident alleged that a man came into her room and was sexually inappropriate with her. The resident was sent to the hospital for evaluation and an investigation was started. The Executive Director (ED), Director of Nursing (DON), the physician and the police were notified. No injury was observed. The type of preventative measures to be put into place after the resident returned to the facility were: care plans and interventions would be updated, and the resident's well-being will be followed. The Hospitalist's progress note, dated 4/28/23, indicated that during the conversation between the resident and the Hospitalist about the possible sexual assault, the resident indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin flexpens were labeled for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed. (500 Hall medication cart) Findings include: During an observation of the 500 Hall medication cart on 6/20/23 at 10:32 a.m., the label was missing from a Humalog flexpen, a glargine flexpen and a Lantus flexpen. Three labeled flexpens were out of their bags with instructions and the LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) placed them back into the correct bags. LPN 13 indicated she was not sure who the insulin flexpens with the missing labels belonged to. She was also not sure how the residents labels came off. During an interview on 6/21/23 at 11:04 a.m., LPN 12 indicated there was a problem in April with the insulin pens not having labels, but nothing recently. Nursing should make sure there was a label on the insulin. During an interview on 6/21/23 at 1:39 p.m., the RDCO (Regional Director of Clinical Operations) indicated the nurses should monitor the medications for an expiration date. Insulin pens should be labeled and bagged. If the nurse obtained the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-21 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a drainage culture was obtained as ordered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for laboratory services. (Resident 57) Findings include: The record for Resident 57 was reviewed on 6/16/23 at 8:16 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, urinary tract infection, ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase) resistance, acute cystitis, obstructive uropathy, acute kidney failure, and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms. The care plan, dated 6/1/22 and last revised on 2/7/23, indicated the resident had a history of infections related to ESBL in his urine. Interventions included, but were not limited to, report abnormal findings to the medical provider, and obtain and monitor laboratory and diagnostic studies as ordered. The NP (Nurse Practitioner) note, dated 6/12/23 at 1:00 a.m., indicated the resident had abnormal non-bloody drainage from his penis. A new order was written to obtain a culture of the drainage. The Medication Administration Note, dated 6/13/23 at 4:08 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) was donned and doffed per CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines upon exit from isolation rooms during 3 of 4 observations on the 300 and 500 halls. (LPN 16, LPN 17, and CNA 15) Findings include: 1. Upon entrance to the facility on 6/14/23 at 9:00 a.m., the ED (Executive Director) indicated surgical masks had to be worn at all times and an N-95 mask and full PPE was required in two rooms due to Residents 71 and 74 testing positive for COVID-19 on 6/13/23. During an observation and interview on 6/14/23 at 12:10 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 16, entered Resident 74's room donned in a gown, gloves, surgical mask, and face shield. She did not don an N-95 mask. Upon exiting the room, she removed her PPE and disposed of it in the trash can just inside the resident's room and went back to her medication cart. She failed to change her surgical mask or sanitize her hands before working on the computer on the cart. She indicated she forgot the N-95 mask. 2. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BORNE-BAUMAN, CANDICE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2023 |
| FLUECKIGER, RUSSELL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2023 |
| LEHMAN, SCOTT | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2023 |
| MACKLIN, LARRY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2023 |
| MCINTIRE, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2023 |
| ADAMS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2023 |
| POTTERS MGT CO LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2017 |
| ODENTHAL, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2017 |
| SIDDIQI, SIRAJ | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2019 |
| SMITH, SCOTT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2023 |
| SPRUNGER, KYLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2023 |
| WELLS, ALICIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/27/2022 |
| WHEELER, DANE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2023 |
| BLUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| FIRST BANK OF BERNE | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2020 |
| OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2017 |
| OMG IN MSTR LSCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/31/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $791K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155265. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.