No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Columbus Healthcare Center

4301 Clime Road North, Columbus, OH 43228 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (614) 276-4400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (614) 276-4400 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0741)6 actual-harm citations$215,120 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 6 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $215,120 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-23)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4300 Clime Rd · (614) 272-1100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4300 Clime Rd · (614) 732-0849 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
725 Georgesville Rd · (614) 432-2601 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Big Darby Metro Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.3%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms26.0%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.3%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.4%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.8%25.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.5%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.0%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.8%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine39.1%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 5.8–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay5.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened15.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.77
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.33
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.60
RN hoursweekends
44.1%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 94.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-23)
22
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

71 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the fall investigation, review of hospital records, hospital staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that staff followed the established care plan and safety protocols for Resident #99 during the provision of care to prevent an incident/accident resulting in the resident falling from the bed to the floor sustaining serious injuries. This resulted in Actual Harm on 03/26/26 when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #333 had provided perineal care independently to Resident #99 while the resident was in bed. Resident #99, who was incontinent, had a communication deficit, was unable to lay on her side without support and care planned for two staff assistance for rolling side to side, rolled sideways off the bed to the floor from approximately 30 inches high, landing with her left knee on top of the air conditioning unit and was screaming and tapping at her left knee indicating pain. Subsequently, Resident #99 was sent to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide timely, necessary and adequate care and services following an acute change in condition involving Resident #88. The facility failed to ensure changes in the resident's medical condition were comprehensively assessed, that high blood glucose levels were communicated to the medical provider, and individualized interventions were implemented. This resulted in Actual Harm with subsequent hospitalization when on 06/23/25 Resident #88 had a high blood glucose reading of 471 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (normal ranges from 80 to 130 mg/dL in adults with type two diabetes) requiring notification to a medical provider, which was not completed. On 06/26/25 and 06/27/25, Resident #88 presented with symptoms of hyperglycemia with changes in mental status, drowsiness, incontinence, and dietary changes. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #127 and CNA #135 reported the changes to nursing staff.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program to ensure adequate interventions were in place to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing. Actual Harm occurred on 08/13/24 when Resident #57, who exhibited severe cognitive impairment, had a current pressure ulcer present and required substantial/maximal assistance for bed mobility was assessed to have a new in-house developed pressure ulcer. The resident was assessed to have a deep tissue injury (Deep Tissue Pressure Injury (DTPI): Intact skin with localized area of persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, purple discoloration due to damage of underlying soft tissue) to the right ischium/hip that developed due to the lack of adequate interventions including turning and repositioning. This affected one (Resident #57) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified four residents with in-house acquired pressure ulcers, including Resident #57. The facility census was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 03/18/14 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus without complications, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, contracture of muscle in left hand, contracture of left ankle, dementia, reduced mobility, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #20 dated 04/05/24 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and depended on staff assistance with eating. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #20 revealed orders dated 02/12/24 for the resident to be weighed weekly on Mondays and offer fortified pudding with lunch and dinner and an order dated 04/01/24 for a pureed textured diet. Review of the weight record for Resident #20 revealed the following dates/weights: -11/08/23 weight of 177 lbs. -01/04/24 weight of 169 lbs. -02/07/24 weight of 156 lbs. -03/07/24 weight of 158 lbs. -03/31/24 weight of 151 lbs. -04/05/24 weight of 153 lbs. -05/07/24 weight of 157 lbs. Review of the progress note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate resident supervision and assistance resulting in a fall with major injury. Actual Harm occurred on 01/19/24 when Resident #1, who was identified at risk for falls, assessed to have cognitive impairment, and required supervision while smoking, exited the facility through two sets of locked doors, to the facility's outdoor smoking area with a cigarette and the intention of helping Receptionist #100 shovel snow due to inclement weather. Once Receptionist #100 discovered the resident was outside, the resident was instructed to return to her room. The resident entered the facility while wearing wet footwear (from snow) and subsequently slipped on the tile floor. The resident sustained a right distal radius and ulnar fracture. The resident was transported to the emergency room for evaluation/splinting and later followed with orthopedic surgery for cast application. This affected one resident (Resident #1) of three residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2021-10-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure nutritional interventions were implemented timely, nutritional recommendations were addressed timely, and failed to ensure diet orders were followed as ordered. Actual harm occurred when Resident #52, who was assessed as a 12 percent weight loss in 30 days, did not have nutritional recommendations addressed timely and nutritional interventions were not implemented timely. Additionally, actual harm occurred when Resident #63, who was assessed as a 21% weight loss in 180 days, did not have nutritional interventions implemented timely and did not receive the appropriate diet. This affected two residents (#52 and #63) of seven reviewed for weight loss. The facility census 92. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 07/16/21 with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement new safety interventions after a resident fall. This affected one resident (#42) of four residents reviewed. The facility census was 88.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, chronic congestive heart failure, retention of urine, need for assistance with personal care, and unsteadiness on feet.Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set 04/23/26 revealed Resident #42 was assessed as being cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #42's required at least partial assistance with transferring on and off the commode.Review of Resident #42's task documentation dated 06/14/26 revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure medications were obtained in a timely manner and were administered as per orders. This affected one resident (#89) out of three residents reviewed for medications administered. The facility census was 88.Findings include:Review of Resident #89's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, borderline personality disorder, bipolar disorder, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, and suicidal ideations.Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #89 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15.Review of physician orders contained in Resident #89's medical record revealed orders for the following medications: Enoxaparin Sodium solution (a blood thinning medication) 40 milligrams (mg) injected subcutaneously two times a day dated 04/16/26, Vancomycin (antibiotic) 1500 mg given…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure call lights were kept within resident's reach. This affected one resident (#2) out of three residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed as cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13. Resident #2's required partial or moderate assistance with sit to stand transfers, such as standing up from a seated position on the bed.Interview on 06/23/26 at 11:26 A.M. with Resident #2 revealed the resident believed their call light was on the floor just next to his bed, so that his arm could reach down to the floor and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were utilized and adequate assessments of pain were completed prior to administering as needed pain medications. This affected one (Resident #94) of three residents reviewed for pain management. The census was 93.Findings Include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver with ascites, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, other chronic pain, polyneuropathy, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, alcohol dependence, morbid obesity, insomnia, restlessness and agitation, mood disorder, vitamin D deficiency, and unspecified convulsions. Review of Resident #94's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/10/26, revealed he was cognitively intact.Review of Resident #94's current physician orders, revealed the resident was ordered as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility staff schedule, the facility failed to provide adequate staffing to meet the behavioral safety needs of all residents. This affected one (Resident #41) of three residents reviewed for behavior management. The census was 93.Findings Include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, borderline personality disorder, postural orthostatic tachycardia, disorientation, mood disorder, suicidal ideations, convulsions, personal history of other mental and behavioral disorders, conversion disorder, anxiety disorder, headache, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, insomnia, muscle weakness, muscle wasting, dysphagia, and fibromyalgia. Review of Resident #41's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/29/26, revealed she was cognitively intact.Review of Resident #41's progress notes, dated 04/21/26,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanity manner. This had the potential to affect all 95 residents admitted to the facility. The facility census was 95.Findings include: Observation of the kitchen dry storage on 03/16/26 at 9:19 A.M. revealed about four bags of unnamed/unlabeled breadsticks on top of the dry storage shelving unit. Further observed revealed some of the breadsticks were observed to have a blueish-green spots on the bread. Observation of the stand-alone fridge on 03/16/26 at 9:30 A.M. revealed a tray of about ten cups of juice; two of the cups were not covered and none of the ten cups were dated. Interview with Kitchen Manager #367 on 03/16/26 at 9:20 A.M. confirmed the breadsticks were not stored in the proper location and removed them from the dry storage area and disposed of them. Additional interview with District Manager #374 confirmed the cups in the fridge should all have covers on them and confirmed items in the kitchen should all have dates on them. Review of the facility's Food Storage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-23 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was maintained in safe operating condition. This had the potential to affect all 95 residents residing within the facility. The facility census was 95.Findings include: Interview with District Manager (DM) #374 on 03/17/26 at 8:40 A.M. revealed one of the ovens is under cooking, the second over is over cooking, and the steamer is not fully functional. DM #374 reported the equipment has been in this condition for at least three weeks, and due to this the facility has been using emergency menus. DM #374 confirmed the equipment not being in working condition has been reported to maintenance and the administrator. Interview with the administrator on 03/17/26 at 8:50 A.M. confirmed the ovens were not working properly and was not aware of the issue with the steamer. The administrator reported new parts were ordered and scheduled to be delivered over the weekend. The administrator was unable to confirm when the equipment stopped functioning properly. Additional interview with the administrator on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents had a comprehensive care plan that reflected their current status. This affected four residents (#15, #45, #75, and #96) of 29 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents.Findings include:1. Review of Resident 15's medical record revealed an original admission date of 04/24/25 and a readmission date of 02/08/26. Resident #15's diagnoses included limitation of activities due to disability, radiculopathy lumbar region, unspecified convulsions, syncope and collapse, muscle wasting and atrophy not elsewhere classified multiple sites, unsteadiness on feet, chronic pain, muscle weakness (generalized), and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 was cognitively intact and independent for eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, upper body dressing, lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear, and personal hygiene. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to have interventions in place to prevent falls for Residents #52, #15, #97, #103, and #94. Additionally, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation following a fall for Resident #88. This affected six residents (#52, #15, #97, #88, #103, and #94) of 11 residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 95 residents.Findings include:1.Resident #52 was admitted [DATE] and has diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident used a wheelchair for mobility and has severe cognitive impairment. Review of the facility incident and accident log revealed Resident #52 suffered falls on 12/24/25 and 01/02/26. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an order for non-skid strips on the floor near bed for recurrent falls from bed ordered on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide showers per resident choice. This affected one (Resident #53) of two residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 95 residents.Findings include:Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included cellulitis of the left lower limb, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, other specified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity class 3, unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness (generalized), need for assistance with personal care, and muscle wasting and atrophy not elsewhere classified multiple sites. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/05/26, revealed Resident #53 was cognitively intact and required substantial or maximal assistance for shower or bathing self. Review of Resident #53's Nursing admission Evaluation dated 12/29/25 revealed Resident #53 preferred a shower in the evening. Review of Resident #53's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 55 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain clean and sanitary bed curtains. This affected one (Resident #45) of three residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 95 residents.Findings include:Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 11/08/24 and a readmission date of 02/20/26. Resident #45's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, long term (current) use of insulin, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease unspecified, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, epilepsy unspecified not intractable without status epilepticus, presence of right artificial shoulder joint, acquired absence of right leg above knee, polyneuropathy unspecified, anemia unspecified, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 was cognitively intact. Observation of Resident #45's bed curtain on 03/16/26 at 10:31 A.M. revealed three dark red stains splattered on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide nail care for Residents #66, and #88 who were dependent on staff for care. This affected two residents (#66 and #88) of seven residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 95.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed an admission date 07/25/25. Resident #66's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease unspecified, repeated falls, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, essential (primary) hypertension, dysphagia oropharyngeal phase, alcohol use unspecified uncomplicated, anxiety disorder unspecified, and depression unspecified. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #66 was cognitively intact. Resident #66 was dependent for putting on and taking off footwear. Observation of Resident #66 on 03/16/26 at 12:22 P.M. revealed long, jagged toenails.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a midline dressing was changed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #53) of one resident reviewed for intravenous access line care. The facility census was 95 residents.Findings include:Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included cellulitis of the left lower limb, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, other specified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and obesity class Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/05/26, revealed Resident #53 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #53's Midline Insertion Record completed 02/27/26 at 12:05 P.M. revealed a midline catheter (a vascular access device used for intravenous therapy) was placed in the left cephalic vein (a vein located in the left upper arm) on 02/27/26. Further review of Resident #53's Midline Insertion Record revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide timely treatment to maintain Resident's #1 hearing abilities. This effected one resident (#1) of one resident reviewed for hearing issues. The facility's census was 95.Record review for Resident #1 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. This resident was assessed to require staff supervision for mobility and self care. Review of the medical record of Resident #1 revealed on 03/09/26, he notified staff he was having trouble hearing out of one of his ears and thought something might be stuck in it.Review of the physician orders of Resident #1 revealed on 03/10/26 he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain weekly weights as ordered for Resident #52. This affected one resident (#52) of seven residents reviewed for nutritional issues. The facility census was 95.Resident #52 was admitted [DATE] and has diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident used a wheelchair for mobility and had severe cognitive impairment. Further review of Resident #52's medical record revealed an order for weekly weights written on 12/04/25. Further review of Resident #52's medical record demonstrated there were no recorded weights for the timeframe between 12/17/25 and 01/08/26. Additionally, there were no recorded weights in the medical record for the timeframe between 02/26/26 and 03/17/26. Dietician #370 was interviewed via telephone about 8:35 A.M. on 03/19/26. She stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to change oxygen tubing as required and failed to ensure the humidifier solution was not empty. This affected one resident (#1) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility's census was 95.Record review for Resident #1 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. This resident was assessed to require staff assistance with mobility and self-care assistance. Review of the care plan dated 02/12/26 revealed Resident #1 is dependent on continuous oxygen therapy related to a medical history of shortness of breath and respiratory failure. Observation and interview on 03/16/26 at 11:15 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide services to treat a resident's anxiety. This affected one (#65) of one resident reviewed for behavioral health. The facility census was 95. Record review for Resident #65 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on 01/14 26 with diagnoses including: multiple fractures of the bilateral ribs, anxiety disorder, fracture of the pelvis, fracture of the right lower leg, depression, and insomnia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. This resident was assessed to require hygiene and mobility assistance from staff.Review of the care plan dated 01/14/26 revealed Resident #65 is at risk of impaired psychosocial well-being. Interventions included a psychiatric mental health consultation and counseling services.Review of the practitioner progress notes of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the social service director job description, the facility failed to timely arrange and follow up on guardianship for Resident #78 according to the expert evaluation. This affected one resident (#78) of one resident reviewed for guardianship. The facility census was 95.Findings include: Review of Resident #78's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/22/23 with diagnoses including chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure, aphasia, dementia, epilepsy, spondylosis, gout, and depression. Review of Resident #78's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident #78's hospital social work Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed the social worker had spoke to the facility about starting guardianship and they were in agreement. Review of Resident #78's statement of expert evaluation completed 03/05/25 revealed it concluded that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered timely for two residents (#101 and #103) of two residents reviewed for timely administration of medications. The facility census was 95.Findings include:1.Review of Resident #103's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/04/26 with diagnoses of major depressive disorder, borderline personality disorder, disorientation, unspecified mood disorder, suicidal ideations, unspecified convulsions, personal history of other mental and behavioral disorders, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, anxiety disorder, dysphagia, uninhibited neuropathic bladder, and fibromyalgia. Review of Resident #103's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of Resident #103's physician orders active on 03/15/26 revealed the following orders: Aprepitant oral capsule 125 milligrams (mg) one time a day for nausea and vomiting, Cariprazine oral capsule…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow parameters for blood pressure medication. This affected one resident, Resident #58, of six reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 95.Findings include: Review of Resident #58's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/09/26 with diagnoses of, but not limited to, type two diabetes, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 02/09/26 revealed a score of 12 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #58's orders on 03/17/26 revealed an order for propranolol hydrochloric acid (HCl) 20 milligram (MG) oral tablet with direction to give on tablet by mouth two times a day for hypertension. Further review of the order revealed parameters for the medication to be held if the resident had a systolic blood pressure of less than 110. Review of Resident #58's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed propranolol HCl 20MG was administered to the resident on the following days with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store medications appropriately when found at Resident #45's bedside. This affected one resident (#45) of one resident observed for medication storage. The facility census was 95 residents.Findings include:Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 11/08/24 and a readmission date of 02/20/26. Resident #45's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease unspecified, epilepsy unspecified not intractable without status epilepticus, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 was cognitively intact. Observation of Resident #45's bedside table on 03/16/26 at 10:31 A.M. revealed a medication cup resting on the edge of the resident's bedside table outside the reach of the resident. The medicine cup contained five unidentified pills. Interview with Resident #45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident representative interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a resident's change in care. This affected one (Resident #21) of four residents review for notification of change. The facility census was 98. Findings include: Review of the probate court of guardianship record dated 05/22/19 revealed Resident #21 has a court appointed guardian pertaining to person only, due to incompetency. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 11/01/21. Diagnoses included dementia, traumatic brain injury, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the care plan dated 08/21/22 revealed Resident #21 has liver disease related to liver cirrhosis and interventions included to report abnormal findings to medical provider and resident/resident representative. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed 01/01/25 revealed Resident #21 had no cognitive impairment. Review of the progress notes dated 01/08/25 revealed Resident #21 was found with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview with hematology oncology department, interview with pharmacist, staff interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure consistent continuity of care between outside providers including implementing physician orders from outside provider and timely communication and follow up with outside provider. This affected two (Residents #46 and #55) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 98. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 04/22/23 with diagnoses including chronic myeloid leukemia and dementia. Review of the physician orders dated 04/23/23 revealed imatinib mesylate (chemotherapy) oral tablet 400 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth in the morning for leukemia. Review of the encounter summary from the hematology clinic dated 10/04/25 at 12:01 P.M. revealed no recommendations to change Resident #55's medications. Review of the progress note dated 01/09/25 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (5%). This affected two (#64 and #80) of four residents observed for medication administration. There were 29 opportunities with four medication errors for a medication error rate of 13.7%. The facility census was 98. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/19/24, with diagnoses of: anoxic brain damage, muscle weakness, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, insomnia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and encounter for attention for gastrostomy. Review of a physician order dated 09/19/24 revealed an order for aspirin low dose 81 milligram (mgs) tablet chewable, give one tablet via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (PEG) (a feeding tube that is surgically inserted through the abdominal wall and into the stomach) one time a day and an order for Guaifenesin Extended Release (ER) tablet 12 hour, 600 mgs, give one tablet via PEG tube every 12 hours for cough.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living was provided with the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene. This affected one of five sampled residents (Resident #57). The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 06/11/21 and diagnoses including dementia, protein-calorie malnutrition, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of a Minimum Data Set assessment completed 06/09/24 revealed a brief interview for mental status score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. It also stated the resident required substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the plan of care initiated 06/30/21 and revised on 07/27/24 revealed Resident #57 had an activity of daily living self care performance deficit as evidenced by requires assistance with activities of daily living related to dementia, decreased mobility, and contractures of bilateral lower extremities.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow up on dietician recommendations to ensure a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, including body weight. This affected one of five sampled residents (Resident #93). The facility census was 96. Findings include: The facility identified two residents as having a significant weight loss in the past 30 days (Residents #93 and #65). Review of the medical record for Resident #93 revealed an admission date of 09/01/23 and diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the floor of the mouth and protein-calorie malnutrition. The resident received a mechanically altered dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) diet. Review of a Minimum Data Set assessment completed 08/10/24 revealed the resident had a brief interview for mental status score of 15, indicating intact cognition. He was independent with eating and was 70 inches tall (five foot, 10 inches). Record review revealed he weighed 122.4 pounds on 06/13/24 and 07/02/24. On 08/02/24 and 08/07/24 he weighed 123.2 pounds. However,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, policy review, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to develop/implement infection control policies to provide a sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This affected two of five sampled residents (Residents #3 and #57). The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 02/08/23 and diagnoses including multiple sclerosis and quadriplegia. Review of wound and skin notes by the wound nurse practitioner on 08/21/24 revealed the resident had a Stage 4 pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone in the ulcer. Slough and/or eschar may be visible on some parts of the wound bed. Epibole (rolled edges), undermining and/or tunneling often occur. Depth varies by anatomical location) on the left buttock and an Unstageable pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-17 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of staff schedules, review of the facility assessment, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure there was a Registered Nurse (RN) on duty for at least eight consecutive hours a day. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 96 residents. Findings include: Review of the staff schedules for the weekends (Saturdays and Sundays) dated from 10/01/23 through 12/31/23 revealed the facility did not have an RN on duty for at least eight consecutive hours a day on 10/15/23, 11/12/23, 11/26/23, 12/09/23, 12/10/23, 12/23/23, and 12/24/23. Review of the facility assessment completed for the facility from 10/01/22 through 09/30/23 revealed the facility would be staffed with six to eight licensed nurses providing direct care per day for 12-hour shifts. Interview on 06/12/24 at 4:26 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed the facility did not have a RN on duty for at least eight consecutive hours a day on the following dates: 10/15/23, 11/12/23, 11/26/23, 12/09/23, 12/10/23, 12/23/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-17 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on employee file review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) received annual performance reviews and 12 hours of continuing education annually. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 96 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of STNA #43's employee file revealed a date of hire of 10/25/22. STNA #43's file did not include an annual performance appraisal or documentation of completion of 12 hours of continuing education annually. Review of STNA #94's employee file revealed a date of hire of 01/30/23. STNA #94's file did not include an annual performance appraisal. Review of STNA #96's employee file revealed a date of hire of 01/11/23. STNA #96's file did not include an annual performance appraisal or documentation of completion of 12 hours of continuing education annually. Interview on 06/10/24 at 4:45 P.M. with Human Resources Director (HRD) #110 confirmed STNAs #43, #94, and #96 had not received annual performance reviews. HRD #110 confirmed STNAs #43 and #96 had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and review the facility policy the facility failed to ensure loose improperly stored medications were discarded and failed to ensure multi use vials of tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD) were dated when they were opened. This had the potential to affect all 96 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1 Observation on 06/05/24 at 10:50 A.M. of the medication cart in the 300-hallway revealed there were eight loose pills in the drawer of the cart below the prepackaged medication cards. Interview on 06/05/24 at 10:50 A.M. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #77 confirmed there eight loose pills in the medication cart and they should have been discarded. Observation on 06/05/24 at 10:55 A.M. of the medication cart in the 400-hallway revealed there were three loose pills in the drawer of the cart below the prepackaged medication cards. Interview on 06/04/24 at 10:50 A.M. with ADON #77 confirmed there three loose pills in the medication cart and they should have been discarded. Review of facility policy titled Storage of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage of food items in the kitchen. This affected all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 96 residents. Findings include: Observation on 06/03/24 at 9:13 A.M. of the refrigerator revealed it contained the following items: a bag of undated shredded cheese, a bag of lettuce undated and left open to air, three pitchers of undated and unlabeled juice. Interview on 06/03/24 at 9:15 A.M. with Kitchen Worker (KW) #25 confirmed the undated and unlabeled food and that the lettuce had been left open to air. KW #25 further confirmed all foods should be labeled and should be dated upon opening and food should be stored in airtight packaging. Observation on 06/03/24 at 9:18 A.M. of the dry storage revealed there were three large, dented cans of tomatoes and two large, dented cans of fruit salad. Interview on 06/03/24 at 9:19 A.M. with KW #40 confirmed the dented cans should not be used and should have been discarded. Review of facility policy titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of pest control logs, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper pest control interventions were in place in the kitchen. This affected all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 96 residents. Findings include Observation on 06/03/24 at 9:13 A.M. revealed there were dozens of gnats in the dry storage area of the kitchen. There was an uncovered bowl of vinegar placed on the shelf near the entrance to the dry storage area. Interview on 06/03/24 at 9:15 A.M. with Kitchen Worker (KW) #25 confirmed the kitchen had a gnat problem which the facility had not treated by a professional pest control company. KW #25 further confirmed the sink near the cooking area had a clog and was slow to drain and the slow drain had not been treated by pest control professionals. Observation on 06/05/24 at 11:55 A.M. revealed during lunch preparation there were gnats flying around the food preparation area. Interview on 06/05/24 at 2:54 P.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #107 revealed he had not heard of any pest…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Resident Council meeting minutes, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely respond to resident concerns. This affected 16 facility-identified (Residents #3, #8, #13, #17, #22, #26, #30, #38, #42, #43, #44, #46, #51, #52, #74, #79) who attended the Resident Council meetings. The facility census was 96 residents. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes dated 08/08/23 revealed residents voiced concerns related to not receiving clothing back from the laundry and aides not providing showers. There was no response to the concerns provided by the facility. Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes dated 09/12/23 revealed residents voiced concerns related to aides not helping with providing toileting/incontinence care, aides stating they would return and then not returning to provide requested care, call lights not being answered, and insufficient staff on the weekends. There was no response to the concerns provided by the facility. Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of Self-Reported Incidents, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, facility failed to ensure resident care plans were updated regarding behavioral changes. This affected one (Resident #81) of two residents reviewed for behaviors. Based on medical record review, resident representative interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility also failed to ensure care conferences were completed for residents. This affected five (Residents #14, #30, #73, #78, #88) of five residents reviewed for care conferences. The census was 96 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 02/15/24 with diagnoses including altered mental status, cognitive communication deficit, type two diabetes mellitus, and transient ischemic attack (TIA) with cerebral infarction. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #81 dated 04/15/24 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. Review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs) #246403 dated 04/15/24 and #247016…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff assistance with personal hygiene received routine nail care. This affected five (Residents #14, #20, #24, #50, #92) of seven residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs.) The facility also failed to ensure dependent residents received routine bathing assistance. This affected two (Residents #27 and #92) of seven residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility census was 96 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 02/18/24 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, functional quadriplegia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, major depressive disorder, convulsions, contracture of right hand, contracture of right upper arm, contracture of right ankle and foot, voice and resonance disorder and status colostomy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #24 dated 03/28/24 revealed the resident had no cognitive deficit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure splints were placed appropriately and orders for fitting of diabetic shoes were completed timely. This affected four (Residents #20, #24, #14 and #47) of four residents reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 96 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 07/14/23 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, muscle wasting, atrophy and difficulty in walking. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #47 dated 04/15/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact, required supervision with ambulation, and was independent with dressing. Review of the physician visit note for Resident #47 dated 04/29/24 revealed the resident needed to be fitted for appropriate diabetic footwear. Review of the nurse practitioner (NP) progress note for Resident #47 dated 04/30/24 revealed patient had seen specialist at spine and joint regarding leg pain and knees buckling. The doctor ordered the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to follow infection control practices for residents with dressings to peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) line site. This affected one (Resident #87) of one resident reviewed for intravenous (IV) therapy. The facility also failed to ensure medications were administered using proper infection control practices. This affected two (Residents #5 and #27) of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility also failed to ensure staff wore proper personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing hands-on care to residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) This affected two (Residents #24 and #43) of 25 facility-identified residents who required EBP. The facility also failed to provide proper wound care in a sanitary manner to prevent cross-contamination. This affected three (Residents #24, #27, and #43) of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident interviews and the facility failed to ensure residents were dressed in an appropriate and dignified manner. This affected one (Resident #43) of two residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 96 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an initial admission date of 09/20/23 with the latest readmission of 01/25/24 with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, spina bifida, diseases of spinal cord, diabetes mellitus, asthma, severe morbid obesity, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, congestive heart failure, cerebrospinal fluid drainage device, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, urinary incontinence, incontinence of feces, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, radiculopathy lumbar region, hydrocephalus and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Review of the plan of care dated 09/29/23 revealed the resident had a self-care deficit related to spina bifida, morbid obesity and refusal of showers. Interventions included the staff would assist the resident with upper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, family and staff interview, facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for one (Resident #88) of one resident reviewed for call lights. The facility also failed to ensure resident choice to go outside when not medically contraindicated. This affected one (Resident #30) of two residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 96 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #88 revealed an admission date of 12/13/23 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphasia, aphasia, atrial fibrillation, muscle weakness and cognitive communication. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #88 dated 05/03/24 revealed Resident #88 was cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of care plan for Resident #88 dated 05/06/24 revealed the resident required assistance with ADLs. Interventions include staff to ensure the resident's call light was within reach. Observation on 06/03/24 at 11:20 A.M. revealed Resident #88's call light was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure accurate advanced directives and code status were reflected in the resident medical record. This affected two (Residents #14 and #30) of two reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 96 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 11/10/10 with diagnoses including aneurysm, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, convulsions, diabetes, polyneuropathy, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of the signed advanced directive paperwork for Resident #14 dated 07/13/20 revealed the resident's code status was do not resuscitate comfort care arrest (DNRCC-A.) Review of physician's orders for Resident #14 revealed an order dated 05/02/23 to change resident's code status to do not resuscitate comfort care (DNRCC.) Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #14 dated 05/22/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the plan of care for Resident #14 dated 05/23/24 revealed resident's code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the primary care physician of resident blood glucose level outside of the physician-ordered parameters. This affected one (Resident #27) of one residents reviewed for insulin. Additionally, the facility failed to notify resident representatives of discontinuation of enteral tube feeding. This affected one (Resident #88) of eight residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 96 residents. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 05/15/24 with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, severe morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, adult failure to thrive, history of malignant neoplasm of prostate and osteoarthritis. Review of the plan of care for Resident #27 dated 05/17/24 revealed the resident had diabetes. Interventions included the following: administer insulin injections as ordered,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident representative interview, and staff interview, the facility to ensure privacy curtains were kept clean. This affected one (Resident #88) of 31 sampled residents. The facility census was 96 residents. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #88 revealed an admission date of 12/13/23 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphasia, aphasia, atrial fibrillation, muscle weakness and cognitive communication. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #88 dated 05/03/24 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required assistance with activities of daily living, (ADLs.) Observation on 06/03/24 at 11:20 A.M. revealed Resident #88's privacy curtain was dirty with brown splatter and food crumbs stuck to it. Interview on 06/04/24 at 9:13 A.M. with Resident #88's representative confirmed the resident's privacy curtain was dirty with splatter and food on it. Observation on 06/04/24 at 4:50 P.M. revealed Resident #88's privacy curtain was dirty with brown splatter and food crumbs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-17 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, review of Pre-admission and Resident Review (PASARR) results letter, and facility policy review, the facility failed to educate, offer, or implement Level II services for residents. This affected one (Resident #39) of two residents reviewed for PASARR screenings. The facility census was 96 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 11/06/23 with medical diagnoses including bipolar disorder, depression, dementia, alcohol abuse, anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Review of the PASARR screening for Resident #39 dated 10/24/23 completed prior to the resident's admission to the facility revealed the resident required ongoing case management from a mental health agency, emergency mental health services, and had an inpatient psychiatric hospitalization in the last two years. Review of the Notice of PASARR Level II Outcome letter for Resident #39 dated 10/25/23 revealed the resident was approved with specialized services for nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely evaluate and treat a rectal fistula, failed to timely schedule an outside gastroenterology (GI) follow-up appointment, and failed to ensure precertification for hospice services was completed. This affected three (Residents #11, #64, and #73) of 31 residents sampled. The facility census was 96 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia, encounter for attention to other artificial openings of urinary tract, encounter for attention to ileostomy, irritable bowel syndrome, and anal fistula (added on [DATE]). Review of the care plan for Resident #11 revised [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired skin integrity. Interventions included complete at skin risk assessment upon admission, readmission, quarterly and as needed, complete weekly skin checks, and provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident representative interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure timely follow up for ophthalmology (vision) services. This affected one (Resident #88) of one resident reviewed for ophthalmology services. The facility census was 96 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #88 revealed an admission date of 12/13/23 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphasia, aphasia, atrial fibrillation, muscle weakness and cognitive communication. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #88 dated 05/03/24 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. Review of the progress note for Resident #88 dated 04/25/24 revealed the resident returned from a doctor appointment with a referral for ophthalmology services. Review of the facility vision provider list dated July 2023 to June 204 revealed Resident #88 was not seen during any of the visits. Interview on 06/04/24 at 9:36 A.M. with Resident #88's representative revealed they wanted resident to see an ophthalmologist and were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess resident pressure ulcers upon admission/readmission to the facility. This affected three (Residents #24, #27, #43) of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 96 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 02/18/24 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, functional quadriplegia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, stage IV pressure ulcer to left buttocks, major depressive disorder, convulsions, contracture of right hand, contracture of right upper arm, contracture of right ankle and foot, voice and resonance disorder and status colostomy. Review of the nursing admission evaluation for Resident #24 dated 02/18/24 revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility with pressure ulcers to the coccyx, and right and left buttocks. The assessment contained no staging, measurements, description of the wound or exudate present. Review of the assessment contained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided timely and upon request. This affected one (Resident #14) of one resident reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 96 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 02/01/11 with diagnoses including aneurysm, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, convulsions, diabetes, polyneuropathy, muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #14 dated 05/22/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required moderate to dependent assistance for personal hygiene and bathing. Review of the plan of care for Resident #14 dated 05/23/24 revealed the resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder with the intervention to check resident every care round for incontinence, toilet upon rising, before and after meals, prior to bedtime and as needed. Review of the progress notes for Resident #14 dated 04/01/24 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was stored appropriately and oxygen nasal cannula tubing was changed as ordered by the physician. This affected two (Residents #27 and #64) of two residents reviewed for respiratory services. The facility census was 96. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 05/15/24 with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), severe morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, adult failure to thrive, history of malignant neoplasm of prostate and osteoarthritis. Review of the plan of care for Resident #27 dated 05/17/24 revealed the resident received bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPap) therapy for obstructive sleep apnea. Interventions included to educate resident/representative on the importance of BiPap therapy and encourage resident to use the BiPap. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital staff interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were notified in writing of proposed discharge from the facility. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for discharge to the hospital. The census was 97. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 12/14/23 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, dysphagia, hypertensive heart, chronic kidney disease and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10 dated 12/22/23 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of staff with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the progress notes for Resident #10 dated 11/16/23 to 02/09/24 revealed the resident was transferred to and from the hospital multiple times and each time prior to the hospital transfer on 02/10/24 the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, resident interviews and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore personal protection equipment appropriately. This had the potential to affect all 92 residents in the facility. The census was 92. Findings include: Interview on 09/27/21, at 10:45 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed there were eight residents who were newly admitted , unvaccinated, and under quarantine isolation precautions. The interview further revealed Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is provided outside of the room on the room door or in a cart. Prior to entering the room, staff are to don a N-95 respirator, gloves, face shield, and isolation gown. Prior to exiting the room, staff should doff the PPE and place it in the receptible, then don a surgical mask and clean their face shield. Interview on 09/27/21, at 5:00 P.M. with the DON and the Administrator, revealed the facility received new admissions after they were tested in the hospital. Unvaccinated newly admitted residents were to be under quarantine precautions for 14 days.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy, interviews with residents and staff, the facility failed to ensure residents were permitted to eat in the dining room to promote well-being and homelike environment. This affected 87 of 87 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified five residents who do not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 92 Findings include: Tour of facility from 09/27/21 through 09/30/21 revealed all residents to be eating in their rooms. The dining room was not observed to be used for resident dining at breakfast, lunch and dinner. Interview on 09/27/21 at 8:36 A.M., with Dietary Aide #114 and [NAME] #160 revealed the dining room was not in use for resident dining. All residents were eating in rooms. Interview on 09/28/21 11:50 A.M., with Interview with Registered Dietitian (RD) #231 reported she has been here a couple of months. RD #231 confirmed residents were not eating in the dining room. RD #231 reported she doesn't like it, but that is how it is during this pandemic. RD #231 reported she does not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-04 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident council meeting minutes and review of facility policy, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to follow up on resident council requests surrounding smoke breaks. This had the potential to affect 25 of 25 residents the facility identified as being smokers. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Interview of Resident #44, during the resident council facility task, on 09/29/21 at 1:42 P.M., Resident #44 reported she was asked by her peers to inquire about the additional smoke break they had requested of the facility. Resident #44 reported the facility provides five smoke breaks throughout the day and indicated prior to COVID-19, the residents received seven smoke breaks throughout the day. Resident #44 reported the Administrator to be aware of the resident request for one additional smoke break to no avail. Review of the facility provided smoking times revealed scheduled smoking sessions are held at 6:30 A.M., 9:15 A.M., 12:45 P.M., 4:00 P.M. and 7:45 P.M. Review of the resident council meeting minutes revealed that on 06/08/21, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician of a significant weight change and failed to notify a physician of a weight change related to edema. This affected three (#3, #41 and #52) of seven residents reviewed for nutrition and one (#59) of one resident reviewed for edema. The facility census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 07/16/21, with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, repeated falls, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. The resident had a height of 64 inches and weight of 78 pounds. The resident had a significant weight loss while not on prescribed weight loss regimen. Review of Resident #52's weights revealed on 08/03/21 a weight of 77.6 pounds was entered in the electronic medical record (EMR) by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-10-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy recommendations were acted on timely. This affected three (#35, #59 and #63) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #35's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 05/13/21, with diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis and dysphasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for admission identified in section H-300 Resident #35 was frequently incontinent of bladder. The following MDS dated [DATE] under section HO-300 identified she had a decline in urinary continence and was now identified as always incontinent of urine. Review of the pharmacy review and recommendation dated 08/23/21 identified no supporting diagnosis and indication for the use of the medication myrbetriq. The report identified if the medication is no longer needed, please discontinue to reduce…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policies and staff interviews, the facility failed to store medications properly and in a manner that deters theft or inappropriate ingestion. This affected three residents (#32, #59, and #71) and had the potential to affect all 41 of 41 residents who reside on the 200 hall and 300 hall. The census was 92. Findings include: 1. Observation on [DATE] at 8:05 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #49) revealed the following items in the 100 and 400 hallway medication carts. -Resident #71 had a bottle of Lantus, that was unopened and was delivered by the pharmacy on [DATE]. The bottle was not refrigerated and was in a baggie that stated Refrigerate. -Resident #32 had an insulin pen located in the 400 hall cart, however she resided on the 300 hallway. Resident #32's insulin pen was inside a discharged residents baggie. -There were additional bottles of opened insulin that had opened dates placed on the bag holding them instead of the actual bottle. Review of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-10-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean environment for residents. This affected four (#25, #29, #32 and #80) of 22 resident's rooms observed. The facility census was 92. Findings include: 1. Observation on 09/28/21 at 9:55 A.M., of Resident #80's room, revealed the resident utilized a tube feeding for all nutrition and a computer screen that goes across the bed for communication. The observations identified there was dried food debris covering the computer screen. The tube feeding pole and base were observed to have dried substance that appeared to be dried tube feeding. Resident #80 was observed to use the retinal screen for all communication with the facility as she is non-verbal. Interview on 09/30/21 at 7:50 A.M., with the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #186) in Resident #80's room, confirmed the communication computer screen had a large amount of dried debris and needed cleaned. The interview further confirmed the tube feeding pole and bases were observed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-04 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility documents review, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify residents or their representatives in writing as to the reason they were being transferred to the hospital. This affected three (#32, #75 and #87) of three residents who were reviewed for hospitalization. The census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #32's medial record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] and transferred to the hospital and admitted on [DATE] and released on 09/24/21. The ombudsman's office was notified; a bed hold letter was sent certified to her representative. However, a letter explaining why she was being transferred to the hospital was not issue to Resident #32 or her representative. 2. Review of Resident #75's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. The ombudsman's office was notified he was discharged to the hospital, a bed hold letter was sent certified to his representative. However, a letter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address a resident experiencing delusions. This affected one (#86) of two residents reviewed for mood and behavior. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #86 revealed an admission date of 09/10/20, with diagnoses including unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, legal blindness, dysphagia, rheumatoid arthritis and fixed delusions. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment. No delusions or hallucinations were indicated. Review of the physician's note dated 09/16/20 revealed when Resident #86 had been in the hospital she had been evaluated by psychiatric services. They initially determined active psychosis; however, this was rescinded. It was determined she had fixed delusions. Review of the Certified Nurse Practitioner note dated 09/23/20 revealed it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, procedure manual review and policy review, the facility failed to provide care and services for pressure ulcer treatments as ordered to promote healing. This affected three (#7, #32 and #71) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 12/30/19 ,with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, gastroesophageal reflux disease and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of the physician orders dated 08/30/21 revealed an order was written to cleanse the coccyx pressure ulcer with normal saline, pat dry, apply medihoney (honey based product for wound management) and foam dressing daily. Review of the pressure skin grid assessment dated [DATE] revealed the coccyx wound was a stage three and measured 3.0 centimeter (cm) in length, 1.0 cm in width and had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was wearing a physician ordered hand splint. This had the potential to affect one (#76) of one resident reviewed for assistive devices. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #76 revealed an admission date of 07/10/20, with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, pulmonary vascular disease, dysphasia, and a contracture to his left hand. Review of Resident #76's medical record revealed on 04/21/21, the physician ordered Resident #76 to wear Left hand splint 7 times per week, staff is to put it on at 8 A.M. and take it off at 2:00 P.M. and check skin prior to donning and after doffing it. Review of Resident #76's plan of care revealed Resident #76 is to wear his splint as the physician ordered. Interview on 09/29/21 at 8:11 A.M., with Resident #76 who is cognitively intact revealed he has had a wrist splint that he should be wearing daily but it has been lost for several months. He reported it to staff but has not received any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record reviews, review of policy, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received a meal prior to leaving for their dialysis appointment and coordinated care with the dialysis center. This affected two (#48 and #75) of two residents reviewed for dialysis. The census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE], with the diagnoses of end stage renal disease, hypertensive, long term insulin uses and acute chronic diastolic congestive heart failure. She is cognitively intact. A care plan relative to her medical and psychological needs revealed individualized intervention with measurable goals. She receives dialysis Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. Review of Resident #48 physician's orders (09/2021) revealed the facility is to send a packed breakfast with resident to dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. It is the responsibility of the night shift to ensure resident receives her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, policy review, medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's medication administration had a medication error rate of less than 5%. The facility was observed to have two medication errors in 35 opportunities for an error rate of 5.7%. This affected two (#32 and #246) of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 92 Findings include: 1. Observation on [DATE] at 7:33 A.M.,of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #154, revealed the nurse was gathering medications for Resident #32, which included scheduled insulin. LPN #154 removed a bottle of Novolog from the medication cart, dated as opened on [DATE] and drew up 14 units of insulin and administered to Resident #32. Review of the policy tilted Pharmacy Insulin Storage form, dated [DATE], identified Novolog can be used for 28 days from the date it was opened. Interview on [DATE] at 10:45 A.M., with LPN #154 confirmed the bottle of Novolog used for Resident #32, was opened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received his cancer medicine as ordered. This affected one (#75) of five residents reviewed for medications. The census was 92. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #75 revealed an admission date of 02/19/2, with diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment and diagnosis of hypertensive heart, chronic kidney disease, chronic diastolic heart failure, malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of right bronchus or lung and type 2 diabetic mellitus. Review of Resident #75's Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 08/2021 to September 2021 revealed Resident #75 has not received the medicine Tagrisso (Osimertinib Mesylate) Tablet 40 milligrams (mg) once a day for cancer since 09/16/21. Review of Resident #75's nurses' progress notes revealed on 09/17/21, the resident's cancer medication (Tagrisso) was not available. The Director of Nursing was notified, and the on-call MD was notified. On 9/23/21, the Resident's oncology doctor was notified about the Tagrisso…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-04 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to timely obtain physician ordered laboratory test and report the results of the laboratory test to the physician. This affected one (#52) of one resident reviewed for urinary tract infections. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 07/16/21, with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, repeated falls, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition, no delusions or hallucinations were indicated. Review of Resident #52's physician's orders for September 2021 revealed an order dated 09/12/21 to obtain urine for a urinary analysis until 09/12/21 at 11:59 P.M., it was indicated this was completed. An additional order dated 09/13/21 revealed an order for a urinary analysis, basic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-04 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate adaptive feeding equipment to residents. This affected one resident (Resident #25) of twelve residents with adaptive feeding equipment. The census was 92. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date 03/08/21. Diagnoses included sequelae of cerebral infarction, unspecified symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions following cerebral infarction, and dysphagia following cerebral infarction. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of one person for eating. Review of the Occupational Therapy (OT) Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 required hand over hand assistance for drinking and self-feeding. Resident #25 required an adaptive cup ([NAME] Cup) in order to enable Resident #25 to grasp the cup more independently. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$215,120 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $26,685 — penalty dated 2026-03-23
  • $67,230 — penalty dated 2025-11-05
  • $42,296 — penalty dated 2024-08-22
  • $62,108 — penalty dated 2024-06-17
  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-02-23
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-21 for 20 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH 3 of 5Charleston Healthcare CenterCharleston, WV

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SECOND OPTION OP CO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/19/2008
OPTION HOLDINGS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 04/19/2008
WILHEIM, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/19/2008
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
STOLTZ, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/19/2008
CLIME MANAGEMENT CO. LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
GROVES, DONNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
MCELDOWNEY, THOMASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/09/2017
PETTAWAY, LINCOLNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/06/2024
C R STOLTZ II LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
C.R. STOLTZ IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
HC REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
I. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
OMG RE HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
R.S. WILHEIM IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
RONALD S WILHEIM 2012 SPOUSAL TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
RRW, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
S.L. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
WILHEIM FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 2%Other / private 33%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$279per resident / day
operating cost
$8,490per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$284per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365686. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next