Canfield Healthcare Center
2958 Canfield Rd, Youngstown, OH 44511 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (330) 792-5511 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent Sep 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $211,331 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-17)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.5% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.5% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 58.7% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.4% | 6.1% | 16.1% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.8% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.3% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.8% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.2% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.3% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.4% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.7% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.8%CMS range 34.9–68.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 6.0–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.81 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 72.4 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.05 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), observation of recorded video, review of a police report, interviews and review of the facility abuse policy, the facility failed to protect Resident #66's right to be free from physical abuse by Housekeeper #582. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm on 09/16/25 at approximately 11:15 A.M. when Housekeeper #582 physically abused Resident #66. Housekeeper #582 pushed Resident #66 in his wheelchair causing the resident to fall out of the wheelchair and hit his head on the nurse's medication cart. Housekeeper #582 was then observed by (staff) witnesses and per the resident to put his hand around Resident #66's neck and punch the resident with a closed fist. Resident #66 was subsequently transferred to the emergency room (ER) for an evaluation. This affected one resident (#66) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 67. On 09/23/25 at 5:27 P.M. the Administrator and Regional Director of Clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-17 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of a facility self-report incident, facility investigation review, police report review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and/or intervention to prevent resident elopement. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for actual harm beginning on 05/24/25 when Resident #13, who was assessed as an elopement risk, had exit seeking behaviors and was deemed incompetent by the court system, was permitted by staff to leave the facility unattended and without guardian consent. The resident's whereabouts were unknown until the resident was returned to the facility via police escort on this same date. The Immediate Jeopardy and potential for actual harm continued on 08/16/25 when staff allowed Resident #61, a moderately cognitively impaired resident to leave the facility unattended. The resident's whereabouts were unknown until the resident was found by police, on 08/17/25 a half mile from the facility sleeping on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of a facility self-report incident, facility investigation review, police report review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and/or intervention to prevent resident elopement. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for actual harm beginning on 05/24/25 when Resident #13, who was assessed as an elopement risk, had exit seeking behaviors and was deemed incompetent by the court system, was permitted by staff to leave the facility unattended and without guardian consent. The resident's whereabouts were unknown until the resident was returned to the facility via police escort on this same date. The Immediate Jeopardy and potential for actual harm continued on 08/16/25 when staff allowed Resident #61, a moderately cognitively impaired resident to leave the facility unattended. The resident's whereabouts were unknown until the resident was found by police, on 08/17/25 a half mile from the facility sleeping on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-09-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of controlled drug administration records, review of facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pain management program, including assessment/monitoring of pain and administration of narcotic pain medication (Percocet) to meet Resident #45's needs and prevent severe pain. Actual harm occurred on 09/18/23 when as needed (PRN) Percocet 5-325 milligrams (mg) was not available to administer to Resident #45 as requested and as ordered by the physician. On 09/18/23 at 10:21 A.M. Resident #45 rated her pain level an eight on a scale of zero (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Resident #45 was administered a dose of Percocet on 09/19/23 at 12:23 P.M. for severe pain rated at a level nine out of 10 after having gone over 48 hours without receiving the Percocet as requested. The resident verbalized she was in excruciating pain during this time-period with facial grimacing with movement of her legs and difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of schedules, review of time punches, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure eight consecutive hours of registered nurse (RN) coverage was provided every day. This had the potential to affect all 72 residents. Findings include:Review of the schedule and time punches for the period between 01/01/25 and 01/07/25 revealed on 01/01/25 one RN was scheduled and worked between 7:30 P.M. and 12:30 A.M. On 01/02/25, an RN worked day shift for 7.75 consecutive hours, leaving at 3:26 P.M. Another RN clocked in at 6:54 P.M., resulting in a lack of RN coverage for eight consecutive hours. The schedules and time sheets revealed on 01/04/25 there were 4.5 hours of RN coverage. On 01/05/25 RN coverage started at 6:40 P.M. On 09/04/25 at 11:57 A.M., Unit Manager #844 stated during the reviewed week of 01/01/25 to 01/07/25 the facility had three RNs, including the Director of Nursing (DON). All three of the RNs were trying to provide RN coverage for the facility, along with their already assigned duties. The findings above were discussed with the Administrator on 09/08/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-17 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of job descriptions and personnel files, and interviews, facility administrative staff failed to identify deficient practices and failed to notify the Administrator of known non-compliance in an attempt to increase compliance. This had the potential to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:1. On [DATE] at 12:12 P.M., Activity Director #800 was heard explaining in front of the Administrator that getting activity assistants to consistently document activities had been an ongoing issue. On [DATE] at 12:12 P.M., the Administrator stated she had not been made aware of the non-compliance with documentation. Had she been made aware, she could have intervened. 2. While reviewing the personnel files and criminal background check log with the Administrator on [DATE] at 10:58 A.M., the Administrator verified there were employees whose criminal background check results had not been received in the time frame specified by the state regulations but were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-17 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility assessment and interview, the facility failed to ensure the assessment was accurate and pertinent to the facility and its available services. This had the potential to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:Review of the facility assessment revealed the assessment was updated 07/10/25. The assessment was not specific to the facility and portions were incomplete. Examples of this included a section regarding offering diverse spiritual, religious programs with the area for specifics about the programs being offered being blank, as well as the frequency they would be held. The assessment indicated the facility had a specialized dementia care unit where staff received additional training related to Alzheimer's and dementia care. The assessment further addressed activities for the dementia care unit with blank areas. The assessment indicated the facility offered in-house dialysis services with an onsite dialysis provider and addressed staff training for dialysis care. The assessment had an area for ancillary services which had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespreadSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure progress notes were comprehensive, accurate and in chronological order for Resident #13, #25, #63, #76, and #83. This affected five (Residents #13, #25, #63, #76, and #83) of six residents records reviewed for clinical documentation. The facility census was 72. Findings include:1. Record review revealed Resident #76 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, secondary malignant neoplasm of bone, malignant neoplasm of cervix uteri, staphylococcus, Stage III pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss, subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle are not exposed, slough may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss, may include undermining and tunneling) of the right buttock, Stage III pressure ulcer of the sacral region, and opioid dependence. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #76 was cognitively intact,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, review of the memorandum from the Department of Health & Human Services, review of guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, review of the facility's Tuberculosis (TB) Risk Assessment and Control Plan and Tuberculosis Symptom Screen Policy-Employee, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate infection control practices during incontinence care for Resident #6. This affected one (Resident #6) of six residents reviewed for infection control. In addition, the facility failed to ensure appropriate Tuberculosis screening for two employees. This had the potential to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident # 6 revealed an admission date of 06/05/25 with diagnoses including immobility syndrome (paraplegic), severe protein-calorie malnutrition, extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance, dysphagia, gastrojejunal ulcer unspecified as acute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were completed quarterly for Residents #4, #25, #43, and #83. This affected four (Residents #4, #25, #43, and #83) of the eight residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 72. Findings include:1. Record review revealed Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, aphasia, dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depression. Review of Resident #4's progress notes revealed Resident #4's last care conference was 10/05/23. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was moderately cognitively impaired as evidenced by a score of eight out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Resident #4 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). Review of Resident #4's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure Resident #83's guardian was permitted to consent or decline influenza and COVID immunizations. This affected one (Resident #83) of three residents reviewed for guardian's consent to treatment. The facility census was 72. Findings include:Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #83 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of ataxic cerebral palsy, epilepsy, nutritional anemia, schizophrenia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Review of the emergency contacts revealed co-guardians were listed as the primary contacts. Review of the Amended Letters of Co-Guardianship filed with Mahoning County Probate Court on 12/09/15 revealed Resident #83's father and Resident #83's son were appointed co-guardians of person only and not estate for an indefinite time period or until revoked. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #83 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a score of 15 out of 15 on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of risks and benefits of medication prior to initiation of the medications. This affected two (Residents #2 and #10) of five residents reviewed for medication use. The facility census was 72. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, weakness and paralysis of one side of the body following a stroke, type two diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis (accumulation of plaque in the arteries), hyperlipidemia, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, insomnia, bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, overactive bladder and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Medication orders included apixaban (anticoagulant) 5 milligrams (mg) every morning and at bedtime (02/22/23), atorvastatin calcium (used to treat high cholesterol) 80 mg at bedtime (12/07/23), Plavix (anti-platelet) 75 mg every morning (12/07/23), divalproex sodium…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to honor a resident's bathing preferences. This affected one (Resident #79) of 13 residents interviewed during a resident council meeting regarding receipt of care in a timely manner. The facility census was 72. Findings include:During a resident council meeting on 08/27/25 between 1:15 P.M. and 1:55 P.M., Resident #79 stated she had been at the facility for one week with no showers provided. Resident #79 stated she had spoken with several nursing assistants about getting a shower. Nursing assistants responded Resident #79 was not on the shower schedule. Review of Resident #79's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/20/25. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, generalized muscle weakness, anxiety disorder, depression, anemia, hyperlipidemia, bipolar disorder, hypertension, arthropathic psoriasis, osteoarthritis, and lumbago with sciatica. An admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify Resident #83's guardian of a change in condition requiring hospitalization. The facility also failed to notify Resident #13's guardian of his intent to sign out on leave of absence (LOA) to get her input and failed to inform her of Resident #13's return to the facility involving police escort in a timely manner. This affected two (Residents #13 and #83) of 22 residents reviewed for notification. The facility census was 72. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/23/25. Resident #13 had a letter of guardianship for person only for an indefinite time dated 04/30/25. Resident #13 had diagnoses including delusional disorders, anti-social personality disorder, anxiety disorder, apraxia (a neurological condition characterized by loss of the ability to perform activities that a person is physically able and willing to do), difficulty walking, and insomnia. Resident #13…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, observation and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #25 were free from staff-to-resident verbal abuse. This affected one (Resident #25) or two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 72. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety, hypertension, and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 had impaired cognition. She required set up assistance with eating, substantial assistance with oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, dressing, personal hygiene and bed mobility. Resident #25 was dependent on staff for showers. Review of the care plan dated 07/31/25 revealed Resident #25 had impaired cognition related to intellectual disability and cognitive communication deficit. Interventions included staff were to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of the shower audit tool and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #6 received showers as scheduled. This affected one (Resident #6) of one resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 72. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of immobility syndrome, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, showers, dressing, and transfers. Resident #6 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #6's current care plan revealed Resident #6 had an ADL self-care performance deficit and required the staff to do all of the effort or have two or more staff to assist. Interview on 08/25/25 at 11:08 A.M. with Resident #6 revealed she was not bathed regularly and at times went one to two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with one-on-one activities to meet their interests and needs. This affected three (Residents #25, #29, and #83) of three residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 72. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/09/25 with diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety, hypertension, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 had impaired cognition and required setup assistance with eating, substantial assistance for oral hygiene, toileting, dressing, personal hygiene, and bed mobility, and finally Resident #25 was dependent on staff for showers. Review of the care plan dated 07/31/25 revealed Resident #25 was alert and oriented and could make her needs known. She continued to sleep a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #83's emergency contact was notified of a change in condition. This affected one (Resident #83) out of three residents reviewed for notification of change in condition. The facility census was 72. Findings include:Review of Resident #83's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 01/07/18 and a discharge date of 06/26/25. Diagnoses included ataxic cerebral palsy, epilepsy, anemia, thoracic aortic aneurysm, schizophrenia, obsessive compulsive disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD), and need for assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and personal care. Review of Resident #83's emergency contacts revealed the resident's father was listed as emergency contact #1; however, throughout the investigation it was identified the resident's father passed away in November of 2022. Resident #83's brother was listed as emergency contact #2. Review of the discharge MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #83…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician visits were provided in accordance with regulations for two (Residents #72 and #74) of three residents reviewed for physician visits. The facility census was 72. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #72's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/25/25. Diagnoses included rhabdomyolysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, hypertension, gout, adult failure to thrive, chest pain, and insomnia. The physician and nurse practitioner documented entries for visits on 06/26/25. There was no further evidence of physician visits as of 09/09/25. On 09/09/25 at 1:57 P.M., Regional Registered Nurse (RN) #896 verified she was only able to locate evidence of Resident #72 being visited by the physician on 06/25/25. All other visits were made by the nurse practitioner. 2. Review of Resident #74's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/10/25. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, anemia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of medication information, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of laboratory values to determine if medications were within recommended therapeutic range. This affected one (Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for medication use. The facility census was 72. Findings include:Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed diagnoses including bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, chronic respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Divalproex sodium delayed release (Depakote) (anti-convulsant) 250 milligrams (mg) every morning and bedtime for bipolar disorder was ordered on 01/23/24. There was no evidence of a Depakote level being obtained since initiation of the Depakote. During an interview on 09/03/25 at 9:33 A.M., Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #889 stated she started in July 2025 and was unaware Resident #2 had not received a Depakote level and she would order one. Review of Medscape information regarding Depakote revealed valproic acid level range was 50-100 micrograms per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to arrange for outside services with an orthopedic doctor in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #5) of 12 residents reviewed for accidents and follow up actions taken related to accidents. The facility census was 72. Findings include:Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed diagnoses including left sided weakness and paralysis following a stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, generalized muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, atrial fibrillation, heart disease, stage three chronic kidney disease and viral hepatitis C. A nursing note dated 06/10/25 at 1:40 A.M. indicated Resident #5 was found on the bathroom floor in which he sustained a skin tear to the left hand knuckles. Resident #5 stated he was trying to go to the bathroom. A note dated 06/10/25 at 3:12 P.M. indicated Resident #5 had fallen and had new left hand swelling. X-ray results were pending. A Nurse Practitioner note dated 06/12/25 revealed x-ray results were reviewed, and Resident #5 would be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain furniture in proper working order. This affected four (Residents #17, #36, #46 and #82) of 72 residents whose environment was screened for safety, functionality and comfort. The facility census was 72. Findings include:1. On 08/26/25 at 1:03 P.M., two drawers of the built-in dresser in room [ROOM NUMBER] were missing and/or broken. Resident #17 and #46 resided in the room. Resident #17 indicated he was admitted after Resident #46 and suggested he might have more information as to how long the drawers were broken. Resident #46 stated one of the drawer fronts had recently broken but was unwilling to provide a time frame. The other had been broken since before he was admitted . The bottom left drawer was also off track and difficult to access. Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/13/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety order and generalized muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #65's written discharge summary was accurate to reflect the amount of the medication, Oxycodone, provided to the resident at the time of discharge. This affected one resident (#65) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 02/29/24 and a discharge date of 02/26/25. Resident #65 had diagnoses including paraplegia, chronic pain syndrome, and major depression. Review of a care plan dated 02/29/24 revealed Resident #65 had chronic complaints of pain. Interventions included to provide medications as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Review of a physician order dated 01/07/25 revealed an order for the controlled substance Oxycodone 20 milligrams (mg) (opioid pain medication) by mouth four times a day. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure an allegation of physical abuse was thoroughly investigated. This affected one resident (#70) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #70, revealed an admission date of 09/30/22. Diagnoses included peripheral neuropathy, repeated falls, presence of other orthopedic joint implants, alcohol dependence, psychoactive substance abuse, cocaine use, vascular dementia, unspecified mood disorder, and schizophrenia. Resident #70 was discharged back to the community on 11/23/23. Review of Resident #70's comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/12/23, revealed the resident had a Brief Inventory Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating he had intact cognition and no memory impairment. The resident was independent or required supervision for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) including bed mobility, transfers, ambulation. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 66 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of schedules and punch detail for Registered Nurses from 09/01/23 to 09/24/23 revealed there was no RN coverage for eight consecutive hours on 09/02/23, 09/03/23, 09/04/23, 09/16/23, 09/17/23, and 09/23/23 as required. Interview on 09/25/23 at 10:56 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed one of the registered nurses, who had been out on maternity leave, just came back to work the previous week. Interview on 09/26/23 at 12:52 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed the facility had not had eight-hour consecutive RN coverage on a daily basis on the dates reviewed above. This deficiency represents non-compliance identified during the investigation of Complaint Number OH00146473
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to serve palatable meals. This affected 65 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified Resident #22 as receiving noting by mouth. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Interview on 09/18/23 at 10:56 A.M. with Resident #19 revealed no hot plates were ever used, and the food was cold. Observation of the tray line on 09/21/23 from 11:55 A.M. to 12:10 P.M. revealed no concerns with food quality. Observation was made as dietary staff prepared the lunch meal that consisted of chicken tacos, rice, corn, and watermelon. Cooking temperatures obtained at this time by Culinary Director #856 using a facility thermometer, confirmed the food being served reached temperatures that assured food safety. Further observation continued as dietary staff plated the lunch meal from a steam table in the kitchen. As the tray line neared an end, the surveyor requested a test tray be prepared and placed on the Wing One food cart. Observation was made as the test tray was prepared, placed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility policy. The facility failed to ensure the dietary staff members wore appropriate hair covering and failed to ensure the kitchen was clean and sanitary. This affected 65 resident who received meals from the kitchen, the facility identified Resident #22 as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 09/18/23 from 8:06 A.M. to 8:31 A.M. with Dietary [NAME] #707 revealed the following concerns: Culinary Aide #711 was observed on tray line not wearing a proper hair covering. At the time of observation, Culinary Aide #711 confirmed she did not have a hair covering on but had one on earlier in the day. Observation of the three-door reach in freezer located in the dry storage area revealed the bottom of the unit had an accumulation of food debris which included 16 loose peas, one corn kernel and two pieces of diced carrot. Observation of the two-door reach in freezer located in the dry storage area revealed the bottom of the unit an accumulation of food debris around the edges.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-29 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to have the required participants at the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement ( QAPI) meeting. This had the potential to affect all 66 residents. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Policy and Standards Procedures Quality Assurance Performance Improvement ( QAPI) Plan #NS 1024-00 revealed the QAPI committee will include the Executive Director, Director of Nursing, Medical Director, Infection Preventionist, three other staff members and other state required attendees. Review of QAPI meeting agendas dated 09/02/22, 10/04/22, 11/02/22, 12/02/22, 01/06/23, 02/07/23, 03/03/23, 04/16/23, 05/04/23, 06/08/23, 07/05/23, 08/03/23, 09/01/23, the Executive Director, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist #706, and Medical Director attended all the meetings but thirteen of thirteen meetings did not have other staff members attend to meet the required attendance of the committee. Interview on 09/26/23 at 3:26 P.M. the Administrator verified no documented evidence other staff members attended the meeting dates.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation , record review, review of medication information, policy review and interview the facility failed to store medication appropriately. Improper storage was identified on two (Unit II medication cart and Unit I medication room) of three storage units observed. This affected four residents, Resident #12, #24, #57, and #261 of 66 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 09/20/23 between 11:30 A.M. and 11:38 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #732 was observed monitoring Resident #24's blood glucose level and administering insulin. While preparing to administer Resident #24's Humalog via an opened insulin pen, it was noted there was no date indicating when the insulin pen was opened. The label indicated the Humalog pen was delivered 08/22/23. This was verified by LPN #732 at the time of observation. Review of the Medscape website revealed opened Humalog pens could be stored at room temperature up to 28 days. 2. Observations of the 100 hall (Unit I) medication room with LPN #725 on 09/26/23 at 10:38 A.M. revealed there were two refrigerators for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a staff member did not verbally abuse Resident #57. This affected one resident (#57) out of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 07/21/23 with diagnoses including opioid abuse, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and depression. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 was cognitively intact, exhibited no behaviors or rejection of care, and required supervision with no setup for walking or locomotion. Review of Resident #57's care plan initiated 08/02/23 revealed Resident #57 had a diagnosis of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder, and had a history of opioid abuse with a goal Resident #57 would not experience any increase in signs or symptoms of mood disturbance. Interventions included administer medications as ordered, behavioral health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete level two Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ( PASRR) for Resident #42's new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. This affected one (Resident #42) of two residents reviewed for PASRR. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 05/26/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbance, adult failure to thrive, solitary pulmonary (lung) nodule, cognitive communication deficit, type two diabetes without complications, anxiety disorder, prostate cancer, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). On 06/28/22 a new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder was added to Resident #42's diagnoses. Review of the 09/08/23 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed Resident #42 was severely impaired cognitively, exhibited no hallucinations or delusions but did exhibit physical and verbal behaviors one to three days during the assessment reference period, required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #48 was provided an opportunity to give input into her plan of care. This effected one resident (Resident #48) of two residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, depression, anxiety disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. An admission assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #48 participated in the 48 hour baseline care planning. A social service note dated 08/30/22 at 7:32 P.M. indicated a call was placed to Resident #48's brother to schedule a care conference meeting. A voice message was left for a return call. A social service note dated 08/31/22 at 4:00 P.M. indicated a call was placed to Resident #48's brother. A care conference via phone was scheduled for 09/07/22 at 11:00 A.M. A social service note dated 08/31/22 at 4:09 P.M. indicated Resident #48's son was notified of the care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to initiate a dressing and grooming restorative program for one resident, Resident #48, of twenty five residents screened for activities of daily living. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, depression, anxiety disorder, hypertension, obesity, difficulty in walking, generalized muscle weakness and osteoporosis. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was moderately cognitively impaired. Extensive assistance was required with bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene. Review of an Occupational Therapy (OT) evaluation dated 07/20/23 indicated Resident #48 had been referred to OT after a recent decline in activities of daily living and weakness. An OT Discharge summary dated [DATE] indicated at the time of discharge from OT, Resident #48 required stand by assistance for hygiene and grooming tasks and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to initiate a Range of Motion (ROM)Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) for one resident , Resident #40, of twenty residents screened for range of motion. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed diagnoses including flaccid hemiplegia (one side of the body loses motor function and becomes weak or paralyzed) affecting the left non-dominant side, stroke and generalized muscle weakness. Review of a Physical Therapy (PT) evaluation dated 08/17/23 revealed Resident #40 had limitations in ROM. A Discharge summary dated [DATE] indicated recommendations for a RNP for transfers and range of motion. During an interview on 09/18/23 at 11:20 A.M., Resident #40 stated she was unable to voluntarily move her left side. Resident #40 used her right arm and moved her left arm stating she was able to do ROM to her left arm. However, she was unable to move her left leg and ROM was not provided. On 09/20/23 at 2:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to eliminate hazard risk when a cognitively and physically impaired resident with fall risk was able to leave the secured courtyard smoking area due to an unsecured gate. This affected one resident ( Resident #31) of eight residents reviewed for accidents/hazards. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of medical record revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of bronchus or lung and brain, secondary malignant neoplasm of unspecified lung, cachexia, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, muscle weakness, need for assistance for personal care, lack of coordination, adult failure to thrive, alcohol abuse. A niece was listed as resident representative durable power of attorney for care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 could make himself understood, was able to understand others, had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, interview, review of an article from the American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, and observation, the facility failed to ensure staff appropriately flushed a feeding tube during medication administration . This effected one (Resident #22) of one resident reviewed for medication administration via feeding tube. Findings include: On 09/20/23 between 11:06 A.M. and 11:15 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse #732 was observed administering medication to Resident #22 via a feeding tube. Among the medications administered were famotidine (a gastric acid secretion reducer), allopurinol (helps prevent increase or decreases uric acid levels), provera (hormone), sertraline (antidepressant), cimetidine (gastric acid secretion reducer) and cod liver oil (liquid). All the pills were crushed. Approximately five milliliters (ml) of water were added to the cups with the medications before they were emptied into the feeding tube. No flushes with water were conducted between the medications. On 09/20/23 at 11:29 A.M., LPN #732 verified although she flushed the feeding tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #29's medication regimen was free of unnecessary medication. The facility failed to ensure a psychotropic medication was discontinued timely following a pharmacy recommendation and nurse practitioner approval. This affected one resident (#29) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #29's initial admission to the facility was 06/30/23. Diagnoses included infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition, ulcer of sacral region unspecified stage, paraplegia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, anxiety disorder, depression, muscle weakness, psychoactive substance abuse, opioid dependence, unspecified mood affective disorder, Viral Hepatitis C, asymptomatic Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection status. Review of the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set Assessment ( MDS) 3.0 dated 07/11/23, revealed the resident's cognition was intact. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain laboratory tests as ordered. This affected one resident (#43) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic peripheral angiopathy, cerebrovascular disease, end stage renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, hypercholesterolemia, anemia, and fatty liver. A progress note by a Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) dated 09/05/23 indicated Resident #43's chief complaint was increased fatigue. No recent labs were available for review. Orders were written for laboratory tests including a Complete Blood Count (CBC) with differential and Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) every week for four weeks. Laboratory results from 09/07/23 revealed abnormal CBC results including an elevated [NAME] Blood Count (WBC) of 11.58 (reference range 4.8-10.8) and elevated platelet account of 440 (reference range of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide routine dental services for Resident #39 and Resident #15. This affected two residents (#15 and #39) of 25 residents screened for dental services. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of major depressive disorder, alcohol dependence, anxiety disorder, Post-traumatic stress disorder, very low level of personal hygiene, personal history of suicidal behavior, severe protein calorie malnutrition, severe obesity due to excess calories, alcoholic hepatitis without ascites, personality disorder, urinary incontinence, incontinence of feces, atrial fibrillation, cognitive communication deficit, need for assistance with personal care, hypertension, disorder of teeth and supporting structures. The resident had a Managed Medicaid Non-PPS insurance. An encounter note written by Nurse Practitioner (NP) #810 date of service 07/13/23 revealed an acuity visit was done for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure treatments were documented in the medical record as completed for Resident #43. This affected one resident (#43) of the 31 resident records reviewed for the annual survey. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed diagnoses including colostomy status. a. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 09/12/23 for application of no sting skin prep around the stoma and to red areas when changing the colostomy bag every shift and an order dated 06/27/23 to change the ostomy bag four times a month. Review of the September 2023 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed staff were not documenting when the colostomy bag was changed. On 09/25/23 at 1:24 P.M., interview of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #706 verified the order for skin prep around the ostomy was a FYI (for your information) order so staff were aware to apply it when colostomy care was provided and was reflecting ostomy care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure adequate infection control measures were implemented during trach care, pressure ulcer bandage changes, and use of the urinary catheter. This affected two residents (#22 and #43). The census was 66. Findings include: 1. On 09/20/23 between 11:15 A.M. to 11:21 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #732 was observed providing trach care and tracheal suctioning for Resident #22. Clean gloves were applied. LPN #732 opened a sterile package which contained a suction catheter and a pair of sterile gloves. The suction catheter was attached to tubing from the suction machine. The suction catheter was removed from the package with the clean gloves instead of using sterile gloves. The section of the catheter being inserted into the trach was handled with the clean glove. The suction catheter was removed with the end wiped with a tissue then reinserted into the trach. When preparing to change the trach inner cannula shiley, a new set of clean…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-09-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the infection/antibiotic stewardship log, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure all antibiotics were appropriate for treatment. This had the potential to affect all 78 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the infection control log dated 01/2021 to 09/2021 revealed there was no evidence August 2021 and September 2021 infections were logged, trended, and checked to ensure antibiotics met criteria for treatment. Review of the log revealed in January 2021 there were two urinary tract infections (UTI) and only one had a culture with an organism listed. There was also one wound infection, one tooth infection, and one eye infection, however the infections were not noted on the map for trending. The map did not include the organism only the site of the infections. All the infections were treated with antibiotics, however only one antibiotic was checked to ensure the resident met criteria for antibiotic treatment. Review of the log for February 2021 there were three wound infections, four UTI's, and one eye infections. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-09-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the infection/antibiotic stewardship log, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure all antibiotics were appropriate for treatment. This had the potential to affect all 78 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the infection control log dated 01/2021 to 09/2021 revealed there was no evidence August 2021 and September 2021 infections were logged, trended, and checked to ensure antibiotics met criteria for treatment. Further review of log revealed in January 2021 there was two urinary tract infection (UTI) and only one had a culture with an organism listed. There was also one wound infection, one tooth infection, and one eye infection, however the infections were not noted on the map for trending. The map did not include the organism only the site of the infections. All the infections were treated with antibiotics, however only one antibiotic was checked to ensure the resident met criteria for antibiotic treatment. The log for February 2021 there was three wound infections, four UTI's, and one eye infections. There was only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of an injury report, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a physician and responsible party received timely notification of an accident involving one (Resident #338) and one (Resident #339) and/or responsible party were timely notified of a room change. This affected two (Resident's #338 and #339) of two residents reviewed for notification. The census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #338's closed medical record revealed diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety disorder, diabetes mellitus, and acquired absence of the left below the knee amputation. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #338 was severely cognitively impaired and required supervision for locomotion on and off the unit. A Nurse Practitioner progress note dated 09/15/20 at 5:32 P.M. indicated Resident #338 had an appointment at the podiatrist who wanted to send her to the emergency department to evaluate her toe for blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of personnel files, review of facility reported incidents, review of the facility's Abuse policy, review of the employee handbook and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff did not misappropriate resident property. This affected one (Resident #340) of five residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of Temporary Nurse Aide #121's personnel file revealed she was hired 01/27/20 as a hospitality aide. The employee became a Temporary Nurse Aide on 09/18/20. The personnel file contained a statement from Business Office Manager #3 which indicated on 11/10/20, Counselor #122 reported Temporary Nurse Aide #121 asked Resident #340 for money (and received money) on several occasions. Temporary Nurse Aide #121 promised to repay Resident #340 on pay day. Temporary Nurse Aide #121 would not repay the money. A statement by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #19 dated 11/14/20 indicated Resident #340 indicated Temporary Nurse Aide #121 had borrowed from her more than once but never repaid the last $25 she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of personnel files, review of facility reported incidents, review of the facility's Abuse policy, review of the employee handbook and interview, the facility failed to ensure allegations of a staff potentially misappropriating a resident's property were reported to the State Agency. This affected one (Resident #340) of five residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of Temporary Nurse Aide #121's personnel file revealed she was hired 01/27/20 as a hospitality aide. The employee became a Temporary Nurse Aide on 09/18/20. The personnel file contained a statement from Business Office Manager #3 which indicated on 11/10/20 Counselor #122 reported Temporary Nurse Aide #121 asked Resident #340 for money (and received money) on several occasions. Temporary Nurse Aide #121 promised to repay Resident #340 on pay day. Temporary Nurse Aide #121 would not repay the money. A statement by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #19 dated 11/14/20 indicated Resident #340 indicated Temporary Nurse Aide #121 borrowed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure treatments for a wound were implemented in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #339) of two residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin impairment. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of Resident #339's medical record indicated an admission date of 06/12/20. Diagnoses included complications of gastric band procedure and anoxic brain damage. Hospital discharge instructions revealed instruction to continue to change midline wound dressing daily. A collagen dressing was to be changed daily and covered with dry gauze. A hand-written nurse to nurse report indicated Resident #339 had a midline incision from an old surgery which had healed but had two open areas. Review of the admission assessment indicated Resident #339 had a surgical incision on the abdomen (no indication of a size or appearance) and a rash. The assessment indicated there was not a treatment order in place for each area noted. There was no documented evidence the physician was contacted for a treatment order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, observation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure restorative therapy was performed per the resident's physician's orders and plan of care. This affected two (Resident's #12 and #339) of four reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (MS), quadriplegia, spondylolysis, and radiculopathy of lumbar and cervical region. Interview on 09/13/21 at 11:20 A.M., with Resident #12 revealed she had MS and spinal cord injuries that have left her a quadriplegic. The resident reported her bilateral hand contractures and knee (leg) contractures had worsen and she could not raise her arms as far as she could after receiving therapy months ago. The resident confirmed she has not received restorative therapy since she had completed therapy months ago. She stated she only received therapy for approximately two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility smoking list, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided adequate supervision while smoking and failed to ensure accurate comprehensive smoking assessments were completed. This affected two (Resident #12 and #62) of four reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 78. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cigarette nicotine dependence, multiple sclerosis (MS), quadriplegia, spondylolysis, and radiculopathy of lumbar and cervical region. Review of the facility smoking list dated 09/01/21 revealed Resident #12 was listed as supervision with and a smoking apron. Review of Resident #12's smoking assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had dexterity problems, smoked six to 10 times daily, could light her own cigarette, required a cigarette holder, and could dispose of a cigarette appropriately. The assessment did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #334 received diet ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #334) of seven residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #334 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcohol dependence, vitamin B deficiency, anemia, and chronic peptic ulcer disease. Interview with Resident #334 on 09/14/21 at 8:22 A.M. revealed he was not getting double portion of meals as ordered. The resident reported he had been using his own money to buy snacks. Review of the facility's list of resident diets dated 09/14/21 revealed no evidence Resident #334 was to receive double portion with meals. Review of Resident #334 diet requisition form dated 08/23/21 revealed no evidence of double portions with meals. Review of Resident #334's admission orders from another…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Seroquel (antipsychotic) was prescribed appropriately for Resident #34 who had no approved diagnoses for the antipsychotic medication. This effected one (Resident #34) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical records for Resident #34 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, Parkinson's disease, metabolic encephalopathy, dementia without behavioral disturbances, kidney failure, and bipolar disorder added to diagnoses list on 09/15/21. Review of the September 2021 physician's orders revealed Resident #34 was ordered Seroquel (antipsychotic) 50 milligrams (mg) by mouth at bedtime for antipsychotic, Carbidopa- Levodopa (anti-Parkinson's agent), Mirapex (anti-Parkinson's agent), Jentadueto (diabetes medication), monitoring for antipsychotic medication side effects and adverse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure dental consents were signed in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #67) of one resident reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including significant weight loss, heart disease, diabetes, and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. The resident had Medicaid insurance. Interview and observation on 09/13/21 at 10:49 A.M., with Resident #67 revealed the resident was noted to be edentulous (no teeth). The resident reported she was supposed to get dentures a few months ago but never heard back from the anyone, and she would really like to get dentures. The dentist had already fitted her for the dentures. Review of Resident #67's dental notes dated 07/02/21 revealed the resident requested new dentures, and she was edentulous. Review of Resident #67's annual Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-09-17 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespreadNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's criminal background check log, review of time punches, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure criminal background check results were received within the State's required time frame of 30 days and permitted staff to continue to have direct contact with residents pending results. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 72. Findings include:During review of the facility's criminal background check log, it was identified Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #816 was hired on 01/15/25. Fingerprints were obtained the same day. CNA #816 was permitted to work on 02/14/25 and report to work/start her shift on 02/18/25 without results being available. Results of the criminal background check were received 02/17/25 and the results were reviewed 02/18/25. On 09/08/25 between 11:19 A.M. and 11:25 A.M., Mobile Human Resource (HR) Manager #902 stated he was unable to provide input into why CNA #816 was permitted to continue to work when her criminal background check results were not received/reviewed within 30 days.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-09-17 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel records and interview, the facility failed to complete required performance evaluations for certified nursing assistants (CNAs). This had the potential to affect all 72 residents. Findings include:1. Review of CNA #812's personnel file revealed a hire date of 08/14/24. There was no evidence of an annual performance review being completed. On 09/04/25 at 2:00 P.M., the Administrator verified she was unable to locate an annual performance review. Although the electronic system indicated it was completed, the form was blank. 2. Review of CNA #816's personnel file revealed a hire date of 01/15/25 with no evidence of a 90-day performance review (more stringent state regulation) being completed. On 09/04/25 at 2:00 P.M., the Administrator verified she was unable to locate a 90-day performance review for CNA #816.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$211,331 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $177,180 — penalty dated 2025-09-17
- $34,151 — penalty dated 2023-09-29
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.2 | -2.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SXCY MSTR LSCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/01/2018 |
| HEALTH CARE LEASE FACILITIES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2018 |
| SXCY HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2018 |
| GROVES, DONNA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| ROMEO, DOMINIC | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2023 |
| STOLTZ, CHARLES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| WILHEIM, RONALD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| CANFIELD MGT CO., LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| LOTT, TIFFANY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/05/2025 |
| RICCIARDI, SANTUCCIO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/05/2025 |
| C.R. STOLTZ FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| C.R. STOLTZ IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| I. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| R.S. WILHEIM IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| RONALD S WILHEIM 2012 SPOUSAL TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| RRW, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| S.L. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| SKILLED HC HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| WILHEIM FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365972. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.