No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Wyant Woods Healthcare Center

200 Wyant Rd, Akron, OH 44313 · For profit - Corporation · 180 certified beds · (330) 836-7953 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0565, F0569)2 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$153,317 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0606) — most recent Feb 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $153,317 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-23)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2680 W Market St · (330) 864-3937 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2801 W Market St · (330) 865-9014 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2775 W Market St · (330) 836-1504 · Call to confirm hours
Park
99 N Miller Rd · (330) 668-9500 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.4%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms36.8%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.2%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication36.9%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.3%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.3%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.3%8.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine39.2%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.14U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.781.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.31
RN hours/ resident / day
0.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.76
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.01
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
40.9%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 169.9 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.01 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.10 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-14)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2022-12-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

60 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, review of the facility's self-reported incident (SRI) and associated facility investigation, review of police reports, review of facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to prevent an incident of staff to resident abuse for Resident #78. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and actual physical and psychosocial harm on 09/19/24 when State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #942 physically abused Resident #78 by spraying the resident in the face with oleoresin capsicum (OC) spray (also known as pepper spray). As a result, Resident #78 complained of his eyes burning and facility staff observed his eyes were red. In addition, a Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Assessment was completed for Resident #78 on 09/20/24, which indicated Resident #78 considered the event traumatic, had nightmares or thought about the event when he did not want to, had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, self-reported incident (SRI) review, review of a police report, personnel file review, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #161 was free from staff to resident physical abuse. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy, the potential for actual physical harm and actual psychosocial harm on 07/24/24 at approximately 10:40 A.M. when Activity Aide (AA) #307 physically abused Resident #161 by jumping on and punching the resident after the resident hit AA #307 with his cane. Staff in the area told AA #307 to back away from Resident #161 but she did not. AA #307 then had to be restrained by Maintenance Technician (MT) #438 as she continued to kick and further assault Resident #161. Interview with Resident #161 on 07/30/24 at 4:18 P.M. revealed he did not feel safe at the facility due to the incident. This affected one resident (#161) of four residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility census was 161 residents. On 08/01/24 at 2:37 P.M. the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, facility investigation review, police report review, facility policy review, review of weather information from www.wunderground.com and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment and provide necessary supervision to prevent Resident #158, who had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, auditory hallucinations, dementia with other behavioral disturbance, homicidal ideations and delusional disorder from eloping from the facility. This resulted Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for actual harm on 07/14/24 when Resident #158 exited the facility without staff knowledge after State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #356 propped the back (locked) door of the secured Buckeye unit open with a wet floor sign. Resident #158 was subsequently located at her father's house in a city approximately 16 miles away from the facility on 07/15/24 around 8:00 A.M. after Family Member (FM) #474 called the facility asking where Resident #158 was and informed Receptionist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on interview, record reviews, review of the facility self-reported incident (SRI), Board of Pharmacy documentation review, observation and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect Residents #101, #108, #111, #114, #115, #127, #219, #265, #400, and #401 from misappropriation of medications. This affected 10 (Residents #101, #108, #111, #114, #115, #127, #219, #265, #400, and #401) of 10 residents reviewed for misappropriation of medications. The facility census was 170. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #101's was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, unspecified dementia and delusional disorders.Review of Resident #101's physician's order revealed an order dated 07/08/23 for Ibuprofen (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory) 600 milligrams (mg) by mouth three times a day for arthritis or pain (prescription number…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, interview, manufacturers guidelines and policy review, the facility failed to sanitize blood glucose monitors appropriately. This affected one (Resident #243) of five residents who required blood glucose monitoring. The facility also failed to ensure infection control standards were followed when administering medications. This affected three (Residents #131, #199 and #218) of five residents observed for medication administration. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 170.Findings include:Review of medical record for Resident #131 noted an admission date of 04/17/24. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, heart failure and diabetes mellitus.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #131 had impaired cognition. Review of medical record for Resident #199 noted an admission date of 08/09/22. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and implement appropriate safety interventions for Resident #138, who continued to operate a power wheelchair at excessive speeds inside the facility despite multiple Occupational Therapy (OT) assessments identifying the resident as unsafe and recommending restriction of power wheelchair use to outdoor areas only. This affected one (Resident #138) of four residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 170.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #138's was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension and muscle weakness.Review of Resident #138's OT progress note dated 10/28/25 revealed the resident hit the door and ran over someone's foot while driving his scooter. The resident needed safety education and training. The resident was very impulsive and showed aggressive behavior very…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, manufactures guidelines and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #218 rinsed his mouth after using a steroid inhaler. This affected one (Resident #218) of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 170.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #218 noted an admission date of 07/28/25. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, depressive type and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #218 had intact cognition. Observation on 02/26/26 at 8:44 A.M. of medication administration noted Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #584 administering medications to Resident #218. LPN #584 handed Resident #218 a BREO steroid inhaler, Resident #218 took one breath and gave the inhaler back to LPN #584. LPN #584 did not encourage or prompt Resident #218 to rinse his mouth after inhaling the steroid.During an interview with LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to administer Resident #402's medications within appropriate timeframes. This affected one (Resident #402) of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 170.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #402 noted an admission date of 06/27/25. Resident #402 was discharged on 11/11/25. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #402 had intact cognition. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) noted Resident #402 was receiving acetaminophen (analgesic) 1000 milligrams (mg) dated 06/27/25 twice a day for pain, hydroxyzine (antianxiety) 50 mg 09/20/25 twice a day for anxiety, Rabeprazole (acid reducer) 20 mg dated 10/11/25 twice a day for heartburn.Review of medication administration audit report which the facility utilizes to track…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were offered timely to residents and guardians. This affected two residents (#117 and #134) out of three resident residents reviewed for care plan meetings. The facility census was 162. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #117 revealed an admission date of 11/25/21. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, epilepsy, encephalopathy, impulse disorder and mood affective disorder. Resident #117 had a guardian since 2015. Review of the progress note dated 05/13/25, authored by Social Service Designee (SSD) #619 revealed a care conference was had last on 05/13/25. There was no documentation after 05/13/25 indicating a care conference for August 2025 or September 2025. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #117 had intact cognition. Resident #117 was dependent on staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, laboratory test reviews, hospital medical records review, pharmacy reviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the monthly pharmacy reviews recommended Resident #117's seizure medications were monitored with laboratory tests timely to prevent high/critical/toxic levels. This affected one resident (#117) out of three residents reviewed for medication monitoring. The facility census was 162. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #117 revealed an admission date of 11/25/21. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, epilepsy, encephalopathy, impulse disorder and mood affective disorder. Resident #117 had a guardian since 2015. Review of the laboratory for Phenobarbital done at the facility for Resident #117 revealed a date of 01/24/25. The Phenobarbital level was 21 (normal range 10 to 40 micrograms per milliliter UG/ML). Review of the laboratory results dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #117's antibiotic medication was administered according to the physician orders. This affected one resident (#117) out of four residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 162. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #117 revealed an admission date of 11/25/21. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, epilepsy, encephalopathy, impulse disorder and mood affective disorder. Resident #117 had a guardian since 2015. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #117 had intact cognition, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15. Resident #117 was dependent on staff for showers, lower body dressing, footwear and personal hygiene and required substantial assistance for toileting, upper body dressing, and oral hygiene and set up assistance for eating.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure residents were appropriately supervised while smoking, resulting in an elopement. This affected one resident (#144) and had the potential to affect all 11 residents who smoked on the Hickory Unit (#24, #55, #75, #101, #102, #122, #129, #134, #144, #148 and #157). Facility census was 163. Findings include: Review of Resident #144's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/05/18 and diagnoses including alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia, major depressive disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, delusional disorder, mild cognitive impairment, impulsive disorder, intermittent explosive disorder, cocaine abuse and dementia in other diseases, severe, with other behavioral disturbances, psychotic disturbance and mood disturbance. Review of a plan of care dated 02/18/21 and revised 07/18/22 revealed Resident #144's guardian had no plans for discharge secondary to Resident #144…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-14 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to respond to or resolve concerns voiced by residents. This affected seven residents (#16, #21, #32, #42, #47, #56, and #112) of seven residents reviewed for Resident Council. The facility census was 158. Findings include: Review of Resident Council Meeting minutes dated January 2024 through April 2025 noted residents requested more activities both in and out of the facility in January, February, June, July, September, and December of 2024 and January and March of 2025. There were no responses or actions documented or provided to indicate the facility was acting on the concerns voiced every month by residents. Interview on 04/07/25 at 2:19 P.M. with Resident #32, who was the Resident Council President (RCP), stated the facility has not a a transportation bus in years. The RCP stated no activities are offered after 4:00 P.M. or on the weekends due to lack of staffing. The RCP stated residents complain about activities all the time. Interview on 04/07/25 at 2:27 P.M. with Activities Leader (AL) #873 stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 47 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the failed to provide activities to meet the interest and needs of residents. This affected eleven residents (#16, # 21, #23, #24, #28, #32, #42, #47, #56, #62, and #112) of 30 residents observed for activities and had the potential to affect the 22 additional residents (#29, #73, #90, #103, #104, #107, #113, #114, #119, #120, #132, #136, #137, #138, #139, #142, #145, #150, #151, #152, #209, and #210) residing on the Birch unit. The facility census was 158. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility activity calendar for April 2025 revealed no activities were provided after 4:00 P.M. Further review noted handouts were the only activity provided after 4:00 P.M. Review of Resident Council Meeting minutes dated January 2024 through April 2025 noted residents requested more activities in and out of the facility in January, February, June, July, September, December of 2024 and January and March of 2025. a. Review of the medical record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper assistance with personal hygiene and grooming tasks. This affected three residents (#25, #99, and #114) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 158. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #99 revealed an admission date of 08/11/21 with diagnosis of hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, asthma, moderate intellectual disabilities, abnormalities of gait and mobility, arthritis, peripheral vascular disease, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #99 required moderate assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the Plan of Care dated 02/05/25 revealed Resident #99 had a deficit related to Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and required moderate assistance with personal hygiene. Observation and interview of Resident #99 on 04/09/25 at 8:11 A.M. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain infection control standards during medication administration and failed to appropriately clean a glucometer. This affected one resident (#32) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility identified 29 residents who required blood sugar monitoring. The facility census was 158. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 02/20/14. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #32 had intact cognition. Review of plan of care noted Resident #32 had diabetes. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered and check blood sugars before meals. Observation on 04/07/25 at 11:54 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #891 preparing medications to be administered to Resident #32. LPN #891 prepared four medications into a medication cup.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to discard expired food items timely and appropriately label or date opened and prepared food items. This had the potential to affect all 166 of 167 resident who received food from the kitchen as Resident #151 received nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 167. Findings include: On 10/15/24 from 6:45 A.M. to 7:00 A.M., the initial walkthrough of the kitchen revealed the reach-in refrigerator contained the following: - One container of beans that was not labeled or dated. - One container of mayonnaise that was not labeled with the open date. - One container of sour cream with an expiration date of 10/12/24. - Three plastic wrapped bundles of sliced cheese that were not labeled or dated. - One bag of lettuce that was not labeled or dated. - One plastic tub containing open packages of hot dogs that was not labeled or dated. - Two small containers of a brown substance that were not labeled or dated. - One container of Dannon Light + Fit vanilla yogurt with an expiration date of 10/03/24 and writing in black marker…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's self-reported incident (SRI) and associated facility investigation, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to remove a perpetrator of abuse from the facility immediately to ensure all residents were protected from further abuse. This affected one resident (#78) and had the potential to affect 22 additional residents (#61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, #73, #74, #75, #76, #77, #79, #80, #81, #82, and #83) who resided on the secured Hickory unit. The facility census was 167. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 12/31/22 and re-admission date of 02/03/23. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right dominant side, aphasia following cerebral infarction, hypertension, vascular dementia with mood and behavior disturbance, expressive language disorder, adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, dysphagia following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's self-reported incident (SRI) and associated facility investigation, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff reported allegations of abuse in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#78) of three reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 167. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 12/31/22 and re-admission date of 02/03/23. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right dominant side, aphasia following cerebral infarction, hypertension, vascular dementia with mood and behavior disturbance, expressive language disorder, adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, impulse disorder, anxiety disorder, delusional disorders, intermittent explosive disorder, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the behavior care plan, revised 08/27/24, revealed Resident #78 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to appropriately assess and monitor Resident #80's closed reduction of the resident's left ankle fracture, a closed reduction of the resident's right first proximal phalanx fracture and a L1 inferior endplate fracture. This finding affected one (Resident #80) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: Review of Resident #80's hospital progress note prior to facility admission, dated 08/08/24 at 10:36 A.M., revealed the resident had a closed reduction of the resident's left ankle fracture, a closed reduction of the resident's right first proximal phalanx fracture and a L1 inferior endplate fracture. A closed reduction of the left ankle was completed in the hospital. The left lower extremity was placed in a bulky splint and the toes had minimal edema. Review of Resident #80's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including nondisplaced fracture of the medial malleolus of the left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to maintain proper infection control techniques during wound care and insulin administration. This affected one (#40) of three residents observed for wound care, one (#165) of one resident observed for insulin administration, and had the potential to affected 52 residents (#2, #11, #12, #19, #21, #22, #26, #27, #35, #40, #46, #55, #56, #59,#62, #64, #69, #72, #73, #81, #83,#87, #91,#98, #102, #103, #106, #110, #111, #112, #115, #120, #122, #123, #126, #128, #129, #131, #134, #137, #140, #141, #142, #147, #149, #151, #153, #156, #157, #165 #166 and #169) residing on the Oak and Walnut halls where Registered Nurses #427 and 304 were providing care. The facility census was 170. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #40's medical records revealed an admission date of 08/26/24. Diagnoses included diabetes and non-compliance with medical treatments. Review of Resident #40's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #165's diabetes was managed appropriately by ensuring insulin was administered according to physician orders. This affected one (#165) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 170. Findings include: Review of Resident #165's medical records revealed an admission date of 08/23/24. Diagnoses included diabetes, developmental delays and schizophrenia. Review of Resident #165's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #165 had intact cognition and required moderate assistance with toileting, bathing and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #165's current physician orders for September 2024 revealed Resident #165 was ordered Fiasp (fast acting insulin) 15 units before meals. Observation of medication administration on 09/10/24 at 7:56 A.M. for Resident #165 with Registered Nurse (RN) #427 revealed RN obtained Resident #165's insulin pen and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-07 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespread
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to hire staff free of disqualifying offenses including abuse. This affected three out of five personnel files reviewed and had the potential to affect all 161 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of personnel files on 07/30/24 at 12:03 P.M. and 4:25 P.M. with the Administrator revealed the following areas of concern: • Review of State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #356's personnel file revealed a date of hire of 03/06/23. Review of STNA #356's background check report dated 03/10/23 revealed a charge dated 03/31/04 for cruelty towards child and child neglect and a charge of aggravated child abuse and cruelty towards child with a note that charge was dropped/abandoned on 07/09/04. Both charges occurred in the state of Florida. • Review of Maintenance Technician (MT) #438's personnel file revealed a date of hire of 06/19/24. Review of MT #438's background check report dated 07/01/24 revealed a charge dated 11/05/18 for possession of drugs (2925.11). • Review of STNA #367's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel record review, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and procedure regarding checking potential applicants against the Ohio Nurse Aide Registry (NAR). This affected three out of five personnel files reviewed and had the potential to affect all 161 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Review of personnel files on 07/30/24 at 12:03 P.M. and 4:25 P.M. with the Administrator revealed the following areas of concern: • Review of State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #356's personnel file revealed a date of hire of 03/06/23. STNA #356's personnel file lacked evidence she was checked against the NAR prior to 07/30/24. A copy of the NAR ran by the Administrator on 07/30/24 was on top of her personnel file. • Review of Maintenance Technician (MT) #438's personnel file revealed a date of hire of 06/19/24. MT #438's personnel file lacked evidence he was checked against the NAR. • Review of Activity Aide (AA) #307's personnel file revealed a date of hire of 06/19/24. AA #307's personnel file lacked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-29 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of admission documents, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely implement effective and individualized interventions to address behavioral health concerns. In addition, the facility failed to monitor the effectiveness of interventions once implemented. This affected one (#70) of three residents reviewed for behavioral health services. The facility census was 167. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 04/17/24. Further review revealed Resident #70 passed away in the facility on 04/26/24. Resident #70 had diagnoses including left non-dominant side hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, type one diabetes mellitus, psychosis, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, delirium, and insomnia. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #70 was transferred from another facility. Review of admission documents, which included progress notes from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review of the Payroll Based- Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report and staff interview, the facility failed ot meet the required minimum staffing levels to meet the needs of the residents. This had the potential to affect all 163 residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 163. Findings include: Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report for quarter three 2023, dated 04/01/23 through 06/30/23, revealed a one star staffing rating and excessively low weekend staffing. Interview on 03/12/24 at 2:51 P.M., with Administrator confirmed the PBJ Staffing Data Report for 04/01/23 through 06/30/23 was reported correctly. The facility reported less than sufficient staffing to meet the needs of the residents. The Administrator verified the facility has no evidence of corrective action to fix the low staffing situation. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00151062 and OH00151071.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation of a video recording, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, self-reported incident (SRI) review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's privacy was maintained, when the resident was video recorded without their permission. During the recording, a staff member was questioning the resident about their opinion on body piercing's. Subsequently the video was posted to a social media website with laughing emojis (small digital image or icon used to express an idea, emotion, etc.) at the bottom of the video. This affected one (#4) of three resident reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 163. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/14/2012. Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, dementia, severe psychotic disturbances and with agitation, extrapyramidal and movement disorders, anxiety disorder, delusional disorder, and epilepsy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place as ordered by the physician and per the fall plan of care. This affected two (Residents #15 and #62) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 164. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/05/22 with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease with dementia, chronic kidney disease and hypertension. A fall risk assessment completed on 12/28/23 indicated Resident #15 was at high risk for falls. Review of the fall risk plan of care for Resident #15 revealed a new intervention of mat to floor beside open side of bed added on 01/06/24. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated 01/08/24 which identified the use of a fall mat to the bedside. Observation on 01/09/24 at 12:00 P.M. revealed Resident #15 lying in bed on her left side with no evidence of any fall mat to the floor beside the bed. On 01/09/24 at 12:02 P.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #211 verified there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigations when investigating a self-reported incident (SRI) for Resident #7, #53, and #409 and when investigating an injury of unknown origin for Resident #33. This affected four residents (Resident #7, #33, #53, and #409) out of five residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 05/14/21. Resident #7's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, dementia with agitation, and impulse disorder. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 had intact cognition, required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. The resident had no behaviors. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission dated of 03/23/22. Resident #53's diagnoses included schizophrenia, impulse disorder, and delusional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to residents were supervised during smoking. This affected eight residents (Resident #30, #35, #36, #54, #70, #80, #129, and #133) of nine residents reviewed for smoking. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 01/26/21. Resident #30's diagnoses included dementia, severe with mood disturbances, psychotic disturbances, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, and nicotine dependence. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was severely cognitively impaired and required supervision with activities of daily living. Record review of the list of residents who smoke and require supervision while smoking revealed Resident #30 required supervision during their smoking breaks. Observation on 12/14/22 at 8:37 A.M. revealed Resident #30 was outside in the courtyard of the secured behavioral unit smoking unsupervised. Interview on 12/14/22 at 8:40 A.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility policy review and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was dated to ensure timely replacement. This affected eight residents (Residents #23, #44, #61, #69, #96, #118, #138 and #145) of 15 residents utilizing oxygen therapy. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #69's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/25/22 and diagnoses including dysphagia, type two diabetes, asthma, vascular dementia with mood disturbance, morbid obesity and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #69's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she did not reject care. Resident #69 was coded as using oxygen. Review of Resident #69's physician's orders revealed an order dated 12/03/22 for oxygen at two liters via nasal cannula [for] as needed dyspnea (shortness of breath) to maintain oxygen saturation at 91% or above. No orders were present regarding changing Resident #69's oxygen tubing as of 12/11/22. Review of Resident #69's December…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and menu spreadsheet review, the facility failed to follow the menu as written. This affected three residents (Residents #38, #95 and #459) observed out of eight residents receiving pureed meals. Findings include: Review of a menu for week two, corresponding to 12/11/22 to 12/17/22 revealed the dinner meal on 12/12/22 included breaded fish on a bun with broccoli florets, tater tots and deluxe fruit salad. Review of a spreadsheet for Dinner Day Nine, Week Two-Monday corresponding to 12/12/22 revealed residents on a pureed diet were to receive a #8-scoop of pureed breaded fish, a #10-scoop of pureed broccoli florets, a half-cup of mashed potatoes, a #16-scoop of pureed dinner roll/bread and a #10-scoop of pureed sliced peaches and pears. Observation of the dinner trayline on 12/12/22 starting at 4:45 P.M. revealed pureed fish, pureed broccoli, mashed potatoes and gravy were noted on the steamtable. Canned fruit was noted on carts adjacent to the steamtable. No pureed bread was observed during dinner trayline. Tray service started at 5:09 P.M. for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and recipe review, the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were prepared in an appropriate manner that preserved its nutritional value. This affected eight residents (Residents #23, #38, #45, #95, #108, #123, #154 and #459) receiving a pureed diet. Findings include: Observation of puree preparation on 12/12/22 starting at 4:18 P.M. revealed Dietary Aide (DA) #543 placed 15 breaded fish filets into the food processor. DA #543 blended the food, then added water by the tablespoon. When DA #543 deemed the puree complete, 10 tablespoons of water had been added. The mixture was tasted and was thick, salty and lacked flavor. Interview with DA #543 at the time of observation indicated she followed the recipe by adding water. No recipe was out and available during the puree preparation observation. Interview on 12/12/22 at 4:32 P.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #555 revealed she would have added milk to thin the puree instead of water. DM #555 tasted the puree when requested and agreed the mixture had no flavor as prepared. Interview on 12/12/22 at 4:34 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy review, record review and guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent the further spread of COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 16 residents (Residents #27, #29, #31, #38, #42, #59, #62, #66, #69, #90, #95, #105, #107, #120, #122 and #138) residing on the [NAME] unit. The facility census was 153 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/22/22 and diagnoses including intermittent explosive disorders, peripheral vascular disease, unspecified dementia, constipation, quadriplegia, sepsis and schizoaffective disorder bipolar type. Review of a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 had severe cognitive impairment and was totally dependent on two staff for bed mobility and transfer. Review of Resident #42's current physician's orders revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect at all times. This affected three residents (Resident #3, #9, and #23) of 42 reviewed for dignity. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 03/18/15. Resident #9's diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, dementia and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 could not complete a mental status assessment. He required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and hygiene. Interview and observation on 12/12/22 at 9:46 A.M. revealed Resident #9's bedroom door closed. The resident was lying in bed with a sheet covering him. He stated staff often entered his room without knocking or introducing themselves and did not wear nametags. He revealed he would like to get out of bed and get dressed for the day. Interview and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in reach. The affected two residents (Resident #19 and Resident #37) out of nine residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 06/09/2019. Resident #19's diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, dementia, epilepsy and paraplegia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had moderately impaired cognition. She required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility and toilet use, extensive assistance of one person for dressing, eating and hygiene and was totally dependent on two staff for transfers. Review of the care plan dated 09/21/22 revealed the resident had a self-care performance deficit. Interventions included assistance with locomotion and tasks that caused frustration. She also used a mechanical lift for transfers with interventions to ensure her call bell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-19 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were disbursed in a timely manner for Resident #209 after death as required. This affected one resident (Resident #209) of five residents reviewed for resident funds. Findings include: Review of Resident #209's closed medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] and diagnoses including moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, dementia without behavioral disturbance, hypertension, alcohol abuse, delusional disorders, major depressive disorder and peripheral vascular disease. Review of an annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #209 was cognitively intact. Review of a nurses' note dated [DATE] revealed Resident #209 passed away at 6:15 P.M. Review of a closed account summary report from [DATE] to [DATE] revealed Resident #209 expired on [DATE]. Review of Resident #209's quarterly statement for [DATE] through [DATE] revealed a balance of $1760.36 on [DATE] and the account was closed on that date.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide shaving assistance to Resident #50 and nail care to Resident #103 timely. This affected two residents (Residents #50 and #103) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 08/31/17. Resident #50's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, type two diabetes mellitus, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of care plan dated 05/27/21 revealed Resident #50 had a self-care performance deficit and required assistance with activities of daily living. Interventions included to provide assistance with personal hygiene and bathing. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #50 required extensive one-person physical assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and personal hygiene; supervision of one person for dressing; supervision with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to change a unsecured sterile dressing utilized to prevent infection at a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line site for Resident #53. This affected one resident (Resident #53) of one resident reviewed for care of PICC line dressings. Findings include: Record review for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 08/24/16. Resident #53's diagnoses included dementia severe with psychotic disturbances. Record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 showing mild cognitive impairement. Resident #53 required limited assistance for bed mobility and extensive assistance for transfers. Record review of the care plan for Resident #53 revealed no care plan for the care of the PICC line. Record review of the physician orders for Resident #53 revealed an order for vancomycin hcl (antibiotic) intravenous solution reconstituted 750 milligrams…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #94's restorative program and splint devices were implemented to assist with range of motion. This affected one resident (Residents #94) of three reviewed for restorative services. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 02/21/20. Resident #94's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, dementia without behavioral disturbance, and vascular dementia. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #94 had intact cognition, required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and toilet use, required total dependence of two staff for transfers, and supervision of one staff for eating. The assessment also indicated the resident was impaired on one side for both upper and lower extremities. Review of the plan of care for Resident #94 dated 10/31/22 revealed the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #9 urine and bowel restorative program was implemented as ordered. This affected one resident (Resident #9) of three reviewed for restorative services. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 03/18/15. Resident #9's diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, dementia and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). Review of Resident #9's bowel assessment dated [DATE] revealed a scheduled toileting program would be initiated. Review of Resident #9's care plan dated 10/25/22 revealed the resident was incontinent of urine and bowel. Interventions included checking for incontinence, establishing voiding patterns and referring to restorative toileting. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident could not complete a mental status assessment. He required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and hygiene. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to recognize and address Residents #3, #140, and #459's significant weight loss. This affected three residents (Resident #3, #140, and #459) of eight residents reviewed for weight loss. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #140 revealed an admission date of 07/15/20. Resident #140's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, weakness, atrial fibrillation, and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of Resident #140's weight as of admission was 147.2 pounds on 07/22/22. Resident then weighed 131.3 pounds on 11/04/22. This reflected a weight loss in three months of 10.8 percent (%). Resident #140's weight on 12/02/22 revealed 143.2 pounds. Review of the medical record for Resident #140 revealed only one nutritional assessment was completed on 07/29/22 in which the Dietician #556 recommended a regular diet with thin liquids. Review of physician's order dated 10/29/22 for Resident #140 revealed an order for a regular diet with thin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-19 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to change a unsecured sterile dressing utilized to prevent infection at a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line site for Resident #53. This affected one resident (Resident #53) of one resident reviewed for care of PICC line dressings. Findings include: Record review for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 08/24/16. Resident #53's diagnoses included dementia severe with psychotic disturbances. Record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 showing mild cognitive impairment. Resident #53 required limited assistance for bed mobility and extensive assistance for transfers. Record review of the care plan for Resident #53 revealed no care plan for the care of the PICC line. Record review of the physician orders for Resident #53 revealed an order for Vancomycin hcl (antibiotic) intravenous solution reconstituted 750 milligrams…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure staff were trained and competent on assessment and monitoring of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line dressings to assure the insertion site was secure and not left exposed. This affected one resident (Resident #53) of one resident reviewed for care of PICC line dressings. Findings include: Record review for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 08/24/16. Resident #53's diagnoses included dementia severe with psychotic disturbances. Record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 showing mild cognitive impairment. Resident #53 required limited assistance for bed mobility and extensive assistance for transfers. Record review of the care plan for Resident #53 revealed no care plan for the care of the PICC line. Record review of the physician orders for Resident #53 revealed an order for Vancomycin hcl (antibiotic)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-19 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide foods per preference. This affected one resident (Resident #62) of four residents reviewed for dietary preferences. Findings include: Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/09/21 and diagnoses including syncope and collapse, altered mental status, suicidal ideations, anxiety disorder, hypertension, unspecified dementia severe with other behavioral disturbance, unspecified dementia severe with mood disturbance, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorders, type two diabetes and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of Resident #62's physician's orders revealed an order dated 10/07/22 for regular diet with diabetic condiments. Review of a food preference assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 received a regular diet. The assessment had food dislikes listed including scrambled eggs. Review of a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was cognitively intact, had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record was complete and accurate. This affected one (Resident #156) of one resident reviewed for discharge records. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #156 revealed an admission date of 10/10/22 and a discharge date of 10/11/22. Resident #156's diagnoses included dementia with agitation, hypertension, and anxiety disorder. Review of the discharge no return anticipated Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition and had an unplanned discharge to the community. Review of the closed hard chart revealed a form titled discharge: Release from Responsibility for Discharge Against Medial Advice (AMA) Form dated 10/11/22 at 4:05 P.M. and signed by Resident #156's power of attorney (POA). Review of the progress notes revealed no documentation related to Resident #156's discharge. Interview on 12/14/22 at 3:23 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure soiled linens were handled to prevent cross contamination during transport and failed to ensure the bottled hand sanitizers used on medication carts were alcohol based. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 167. Findings include: 1. Observation on 11/06/19 at 9:24 A.M. revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #254 carrying a blanket which had a large amount of brown stool to the soiled linen room with half of the blanket dragging on the floor behind the STNA. Interview on 11/06/19 at 9:28 A.M. with STNA #254 revealed she had changed Resident #90's bed and did not bag the soiled linen prior to leaving the resident's room. STNA #254 indicated she should have bagged the linen instead of carrying it down the hall and confirmed she dragged half of the soiled blanket on the flooring when transporting the blanket to the soiled utility room. 2. Observation on 11/04/19 at 11:00 A.M. revealed hand sanitizer bottles on each of the eight medication carts. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-11-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for its residents. This affected Residents #71, #164, #121, #5, #49, #2, #13, #14, #36, #57, #133, #139, #141, #260, #99, #150, #111, #136, #106, #155, #156, #35, #47, #22, #44, #154, #61, #108, #129, #107, #151, #3, #24, #189 and had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 167. Findings include: An environmental tour was conducted on 11/04/19 between 10:00 A.M. and 10:33 A.M. with Housekeeping Supervisor (HSK) #990. The follow was observed and verified at the time of discovery by HSK #990. 1. A very strong urine odor was noted in the room of Residents #71 and #164. 2. The overhead light in the room of Resident #121 did not have a cover. 3. The privacy curtain in the room of Resident #5 was significantly stained. 4. The carpet in Resident #49's room was significantly stained. 5. The rooms of Residents #2, #13, #14, #36, #57, #133, #130, #139, #141, and #260 had ceiling tiles that were water stained. 6. The rooms of Residents #3, #24, #189 had ceiling tiles…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-11-06 · tag F0920 — pattern
    Provide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the dining tables on the hickory unit were structurally sound and stable for residents to eat their meals from. This affected four of 19 residents who ate their meals in the Hickory unit, Residents #44, #101, #157, and #365. The facility census was 167. Findings include: During observations of the lunch meal on 11/03/19 at 11:32 A.M. on the Hickory unit. There were two tables sitting adjacent to each other near the window which wobbled severely. Staff attempted to put the edge of one table beneath the edge of the second table in a attempt to prevent the tables from moving. They were unsuccessful in their attempt to stabilize the table. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #309 had asked Resident #44 if she wanted to sit somewhere else and she stated no it was okay. The other three residents were not given an opportunity to move to another table. The tables were observed to continue to rock as the residents tried to eat. Seated at the two tables were Residents #44, #101, #157, and #365. This was verified at the time of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #156's advance directives and physician orders accurately reflected the resident's code status. This affected one (Resident #156) of thirty-two residents whose records were reviewed. Findings include: Review of Resident #156's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere without behavioral disturbance, Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease with late onset. Review of Resident #156's physician orders revealed an order dated 10/01/19 which indicated the resident's code status was DNR comfort care (DNR CC) which would not include chest compressions, resuscitative drugs, cardiac monitoring or anything other than comfort care measures. Review of Resident #156's Ohio DNR Identification Form dated 08/07/19 indicated the resident's code status was Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNR CCA) which included life saving measures that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to timely assess bruising and immediately report the bruising as an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency. This affected one (Resident #122) of four residents reviewed for general skin conditions. Findings include: Observation of Resident #122 on 11/03/19 at 9:56 A.M. revealed he was in the common dining room on the second floor secured memory care unit. Further observation at this time revealed Resident #122 had multiple dark red/purple bruises to both arms. All bruises were circular but of different sizes and were located on the anterior and posterior surfaces of the arms. There were seven bruises on the right arm and five bruises to the left arm. Resident #122 was unable to explain how the bruising occurred. Review of Resident #122's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance and major depressive disorder.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-06 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #24 and #146 and their representatives were notified in writing the reason for the discharge to the hospital in an easily understood language. This affected two (Residents #24 and #146) of five residents whose records were reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Smith's fracture of the left radius, vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #24's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited a memory problem. Review of Resident #24's progress note dated 08/04/19 at 4:28 P.M. indicated the facility received a call from the hospital and the resident was being admitted for possible metabolic encephalopathy. Review of Resident #24's progress note dated 08/07/19 at 8:00 P.M. indicated the resident returned from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-06 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #24 and #146 and their representatives were notified in writing of the facility policy for bed holds including the reserve bed payment. This affected two (Residents #24 and #146) of five residents whose records were reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Smith's fracture of the left radius, vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #24's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited a memory problem. The medical record revealed the resident's payor source was Medicaid CareSource Review of Resident #24's progress note dated 08/04/19 at 4:28 P.M. indicated the facility received a call from the hospital and the resident was being admitted for possible metabolic encephalopathy. Review of Resident #24's progress note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #24 and #128's activity care plans included measurable goals and interventions to meet the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of the residents. This affected two (Residents #24 and #128) of 38 residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere with behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder and insomnia. Review of Resident #24's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident exhibited a memory problem. Review of Resident #24's fall care plan revealed an intervention dated 08/08/19 to encourage participation in activities that promoted exercise, physical activity for strengthening and improved mobility. Further review of Resident #24's medical record and care plans did not reveal an activity care plan that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #24's skin care plan was revised to include goals and interventions related to the resident's left hand cast. This affected one (Residents #24) of 38 residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings include: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Smith's fracture of the left radius, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere with behavioral disturbance and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #24's MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] confirmed the resident exhibited a memory problem. Review of Resident #24's physician orders revealed an order dated 09/24/19 and discontinued on 11/05/19 to keep the resident's left arm cast clean and dry with non weight bearing to the left hand. Review of Resident #24's medical record and care plans did not reveal evidence a care plan was revised with goals and interventions related to the resident's left arm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-06 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the restorative program for ambulation was provided for Resident #97 and restorative program for range of motion was provided for Resident #23. This affected two out of three residents reviewed for restorative programs. Findings include: 1. Resident #97 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including morbid obesity, heart/kidney disease, mental illness and intellectual disability. Resident #97's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #97 needed supervision for walking in her room and was independent with locomotion using a wheelchair on and off the unit. Resident #97's physician orders dated 10/31/19 indicated a restorative ambulation program. The ambulation program included for one staff to assist Resident #97 to use a front wheeled walker to ambulate up to 50 feet followed with a wheelchair 15 minutes a day six to seven days a week. An interview with Therapy Director #308 on 11/05/19 at 10:25 A.M. indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #160's fingernails were clean and manicured and Residents #38 and #160's faces were free of excessive facial hair. This affected two (Residents #38 and #160) of 35 residents observed for activities of daily living. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, dementia and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance for dressing, bed mobility, transferring, toileting and personal hygiene. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #160 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #160 was severely cognitively impaired and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate weights were obtained and to verify weights as needed. This affected two residents (Residents #49 and #63) of nine residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 167. Findings include: Review of Resident #49's record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, anxiety, alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia, slow transit constipation, and functional diarrhea. Review of the quarterly comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident required set-up of his meals by one staff person. Review of physician orders revealed the resident was ordered a regular diet with thin liquids. Further review of the resident's record revealed on 09/05/19 the resident weighed 173.6 pounds. On 10/01/19 the resident weighed 162.8, a loss of 10.8 pounds in one month. There was no re-weigh of the resident after the 10/01/19 weight. Review of Resident #63's record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #55's enteral feedings infused as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #55) of one resident receiving tube feeding in the facility. Findings include: Review of Resident #55's record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Huntington's disease, bipolar disorder, gastrostomy tube, other chorea, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, vitamin D deficiency, functional quadriplegia, anxiety and abnormal involuntary movements. Review of a physician ordered dated 05/15/19 revealed the order indicated to disconnect the tube feeding solution from 9:30 A.M. to 11:30 A.M. while up in the common area in a chair every day. Review of a physician order dated 05/22/19 revealed the order indicated to infuse enteral tube feeding solution at 60 milliliters continuously for a total volume of 1,320 milliliters in 22 hours. Observation of Resident #55 on 11/03/19 at 9:30 A.M. indicated the tube feeding tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility did not ensure Resident #122's medical record included documentation of two separate resident to resident incidents including assessments and interventions which were completed following the incidents. This affected one (Resident #122) of 39 residents whose records were reviewed. Findings include: Review of Resident #122's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, delusional disorders and dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere with behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident #122's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited a memory problem. Review of Resident #122's medical record and progress notes from 10/17/19 to 11/04/19 did not reveal evidence of any incidents with other residents. Interview on 11/04/19 at 10:10 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #293 indicated Resident #122 and Resident #10 had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$153,317 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $47,074 — penalty dated 2024-10-23
  • $106,243 — penalty dated 2024-08-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 3 of 5Charleston Healthcare CenterCharleston, WV

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CONSOLIDATED OP CO., LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2020
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2020
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2020
NE BAKER HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/16/2005
THE STEPHEN L. ROSEDALE 2012 SPOUSAL TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/16/2005
GROVES, DONNAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
STOLTZ, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/16/2005
WILHEIM, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/01/2020
WYANT MGT CO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/16/2025
ACKERMAN, GREGIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/24/2024
LEHNER, THOMASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2012
C.R. STOLTZ IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2005
CONSOLIDATED CAP CO., LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2020
I. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2005
R.S. WILHEIM IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2005
RONALD S WILHEIM 2012 SPOUSAL TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2005
ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2005
RRW, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2005
S.L. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2005
WILHEIM FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2005

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+17.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 1%Other / private 17%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$254per resident / day
operating cost
$7,716per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$306per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365779. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next