Holly Hill Healthcare Center
531 Stevenson Lane, Towson, MD 21286 · For profit - Corporation · 75 certified beds · (410) 823-5310 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (85) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,278 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-01)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.1% | 20.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 15.5% | 22.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.4% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.1% | 22.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.9% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.5% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.8% | 5.9% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.6% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.6% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 63.0% | 80.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.7% | 21.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.1% | 9.8% | 12.0% | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 57.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.5%CMS range 36.2–63.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 7.3–15.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 57.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 57.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 4.3–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.04 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 68.9 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
85 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 74 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-08-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of a facility reported incident with investigation, medical record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to protect a cognitively impaired resident from physical abuse from facility staff. This was evident for 2 (#6, and #11) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse during a complaint survey. This resulted in actual harm to resident #6. The findings include: 1. A review on 7/30/25 at 9 AM, investigation revealed that on 9/7/24 Resident #6 alleged that GNA #10, physically abused them by slapping open hands on the face. The GNA was suspended, and a full investigation was launched. Further review of the facility investigation revealed that another Resident #8, was a witness to the incident. On 7/30/25 at 9 AM, a review of Resident # 6's written statement dated 9/7/24, revealed that the resident stated that someone hit me in the face, they ambushed me and punched me in the face. On 9/7/24 the Resident was assessed by his/her physician and received psychiatric services after the incident. The Nursing progress note assessment on 9/7/24 in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of resident medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received the necessary monitoring to promote their well-being. This was evident of one (Resident #5) out of six residents reviewed during this complaint survey.The findings include:During a complaint investigation on 5/11/26 at 11:00 AM, it was revealed that Resident #5's family member noted the resident had a purple bruise under his/her eye on 2/12/26. However, the family member was not notified regarding the incident, and the facility provided two conflicting explanations for the cause of the bruise.A review of Resident #5's medical records on 5/11/26 at 1:59 PM revealed that on 2/13/26 at 7:43 AM, a nurse documented in a progress note that the resident bumped his/her head on the headboard during AM care, noting a raised knot but no bruising or discoloration. Additionally, a progress note by the facility Nurse Practitioner, service date 2/13/26 and signed on 2/15/26, stated: per GNA he/she was taking the patient to his/her room for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-05 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have a full time (Full-time means working 35 or more hours a week) clinically qualified Food Service Director. This was evident for 1 of 1 Food service Director reviewed for required credentialing. The findings include: On 02/28/24 at 01:07 PM, during an interview with Registered Dietician (RD) Staff #13, it was revealed that she/he worked 16 hrs a week and did not get involved with the kitchen, but monitored monthly food tasting and temperatures only. On 02/29/24 at 12:01 PM, the Dietary Director (staff #17) was interviewed and reported that he/she worked for five years in healthcare-related areas, and had a certificate for Baltimore food service manager valid until Sep 2026. They were enrolled in a self-paced Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) program. They had initiated the first module and anticipating to complete it in 8-12 months. Staff #17 reported he has oversight from a corporate CDM. Surveyor Requested copies of any credentials he currently has; as well as credentials from the corporate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility. The findings include: On 02/22/24 at 12:52 PM, surveyor observed food serving trays with chipped and cracked edges. On 02/22/24 at 01:20 PM, surveyor reviewed chipped and cracked trays that were observed in use with the Food service Director (staff#17). On 02/29/24 at 12:08 PM, an observation of the trayline revealed several food trays with chips and cracks. At least 6 out of 10 trays observed in a food transportation cart revealed significant chips and cracks. On 02/29/24 at 02:08 PM, surveyor reviewed the concern with staff #17, that many of the serving trays had chips and cracks. Staff #17 confirmed that new trays would be ordered to replace the chipped and cracked trays. On 03/04/24 at 03:30 PM, surveyor reviewed with the Director of Nursing (DON) the concern regarding the failure to maintain food trays in good condition.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all laundry was processed and handled in a manner that prevents cross contamination and the spread of infections by failing to keep the door closed that separated the clean from the soiled area of the laundry room. This was evident for 1 of 1 laundry rooms and had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 3/5/24 at 3:38 PM, while accompanied by the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), a tour of the facility's laundry area revealed the laundry area consisted of a soiled laundry room, a clean laundry room and a room holding clean clothing , which the NHA indicated held clothes and linens belonging to residents which had not been labeled with a resident's name. Both the clean laundry room and the clean clothing room were accessed from the soiled laundry room. At that time, 2 surveyors observed that the door between the soiled and clean laundry room remained open while a laundry aid was processing clean laundry and, the entrance to the clothing room was open, with no barrier…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations to maintain residents' independence by failing to provide adequate bed side lighting that was accessible to residents with decreased mobility. This was evident for 14 rooms out of 16 rooms, observed during a survey. The findings include: On 2/21/24 at 10:30 AM, during an Interview, Resident #269 reported that s/he had recently been admitted to the facility. Resident #269 reported that s/he liked to read, however, s/he was unable to get out of bed without assistance and was unable to turn on or off their overhead bed light from their bed. On 2/21/24 at 10:31 AM, an observation in Resident #269's room revealed a light switch on the wall behind the resident bed, which was out of reach of the resident. On 2/23/24 at 10:18 AM, an interview with Occupational Therapist Staff #7 reported that the resident was unable to get out of bed safely without assistance. On 2/21/24 at 7:08 AM, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident/resident's representative in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 3 (#27, #15 and #33) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) On 2/27/24 at 11:00 AM, a review of Resident #27's electronic health record (EHR) revealed that Resident #27 was transferred to an acute care facility on 2/2/24. In a SBAR Summary for Providers note, on 2/2/24 at 12:24 PM, the nurse documented that Resident #27 had a change in condition, the primary care provider was notified, and recommended Resident #27 be sent to the hospital. Further review of the resident's EHR, and hard paper medical record failed to reveal any documentation that Resident #27 and/or the resident's representative (RR) was notified in writing of the resident's transfer along with the reason for the transfer. On 3/1/24 at 11:52, during an interview, Staff #15, Social Services Director (SSD), stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify residents and/or their representatives in writing of the bed-hold policy upon transfer of residents to an acute care facility. This was evident for 3 (#27, #15, #33) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The findings include: 1) A review of Resident #27's electronic health record (EHR) on 2/27/24 at 11:00 AM, revealed that the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 2/2/24. In an SBAR Summary for Providers note, on 2/2/24 at 12:24 PM, the nurse documented that Resident #27 had a change in condition, the primary care provider was notified, and the resident was sent to the hospital. Continued review of the medical record failed to reveal evidence that the resident was given a copy of the facility's bed hold policy when s/he was transferred to the hospital. On 3/1/24 at 11:52 AM, during an interview, the SSD stated that she was not responsible for notifying the resident's representative (RP) of the facility's bed hold policy when the resident was transferred to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-05 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to complete comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the regulatory time frames to facilitate appropriate care planning and maintain current and accurate assessment records. This was evident for 3 (#37, #57, #59) of 44 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool nursing home staff use to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. The admission MDS assessment is a comprehensive assessment for new residents and, under some circumstances, returning residents. It must be completed by the end of day 14, counting the date of admission to the facility as day 1. Completion of the Comprehensive Annual MDS assessment, including the Care Area Assessments (CAA), must be completed no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). The last day of this observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility, 1) failed to ensure that interdisciplinary team (IDT) care plan meetings were scheduled after each Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, and 2) failed to ensure that resident care plans were reviewed and revised by the IDT after each MDS assessment. This was evident for 4 (Resident #6, #9, #21, #16) of 4 residents reviewed for care planning, and 1 (Resident #70) of 2 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The findings include: Minimum Data Set (MDS)- The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) is the last day of the observation period that the assessment covers. 1a) On 02/22/24 at 12:35 PM, medical record review revealed that Resident # 6 had been in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and records review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident with an ongoing program for activities based on individual preference and the comprehensive assessment. This was evident for 3 (Resident #33, #70, #16) of 6 residents reviewed for activities. The findings include: 1) Resident #33 has been residing in the facility since 2019 and his/her medical record indicated that s/he is dependent on staff for bowel and bladder needs, eating, bathing, dressing, and feeding. On 2/20/24 at 10:47 AM, Resident #33 was observed sitting in a wheelchair outside the resident's room with no activity being provided. On 2/28/24 at 8:39 AM, Resident #33's medical record was reviewed and revealed the resident was not assessed for section F (Preferences for customary routine and activities) in the last annual Minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/22/23. Further review of the resident's medical record revealed an Activity Preferences Interview documented by the Activities Director (AD Staff #27) on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 74 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete; accurately documented; readily accessible; and systematically organized. This was evident for 3 (#9, #49, #68) of 43 residents, reviewed during the survey. Maryland MOLST (Maryland Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) is a portable and enduring medical order form covering options for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and other life-sustaining treatments. The medical orders are based on a patient's wishes about medical treatments. If an updated MOLST form is completed, all older forms shall be voided in accordance with the MOLST's instructions: Voiding the Form: To void this medical order form, the physician, NP, or PA shall draw a diagonal line through the sheet, write VOID in large letters across the page, and sign and date below the line. A nurse may take a verbal order from a physician, NP, or PA to void the MOLST order form. Keep the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the residents' dignity, by staff standing over residents while assisting them to eat. This was evident for 2 Residents (Resident #38 and #42) observed in one dining area out of the three dining areas in the facility. The findings include: On 02/20/24 at 12:49 PM, the surveyor observed Staff #7 (Occupational therapist) feeding resident # 38 while standing and Staff #8 ( Staffing Coordinator) feeding resident # 42 while standing. On 02/29/24 at 01:22 PM, during the surveyor's interview with staff # 8, they confirmed that they were feeding the resident on 02/20/24 while standing. When asked if she/he was ever instructed to sit with a Resident while feeding, they indicated that the educational course/ training offered to them did not cover the topic. Staff # 8 then stated, I'm a stander. On 03/04/24 at 03:30 PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON): When asked about expectations of where staff should be when feeding residents, DON indicated that staff should be sitting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) to residents who were discharged from Medicare Part A services but had benefit days remaining and intended to remain at the nursing facility receiving non-skilled care. This was evident for 2 (#51, #57) of 3 residents reviewed for Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Protection Notification. The findings include: Residents with Medicare Part A have certain rights and protections related to financial liability and appeals. The financial liability, appeal rights, and protections are communicated to beneficiaries through notices given by providers to residents who are being discharged from Medicare services but have Medicare benefit days remaining. The notices include: Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC): This must be issued at least two calendar days before the last day of Medicare coverage. Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN): This notice must be issued far enough before delivering potentially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse.This was evident for 3 (Resident #68, # 23, and # 53) of 12 residents reviewed for abuse during a survey. The findings include: 1) On 2/28/24 at 10:37 AM, a review of the facility's investigation for the self-report, MD00201824, was conducted. The facility's initial self-report documented that, when Resident #68 was transferred to the hospital due to a fall, EMS (emergency medical systems) personnel alleged the resident appeared to be abused or neglected by the facility. Continued review of the documents included with the facility's investigation failed to reveal evidence that staff interviews had been completed during the facility's investigation, and there were no interviews of staff assigned to the resident at the time of the alleged event. On 2/29/24 at 1:50 PM, during an interview, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was made aware there were no staff interviews included with documentation of the facility's investigation of the self-reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based in record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to communicate the residents comprehensive care plan goal to the receiving healthcare institution to ensure safe and effective transition of care. This was evident for 1 (Resident #33) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: Resident #33 has been residing in the facility since 2019. On 2/21/24 at 3:09 PM, Resident #33's medical record was reviewed and revealed that s/he was sent out to the emergency department in January of 2024. On 2/28/24 at 1:40 PM, Resident #33's transfer form, with a reference date of 1/21/24, completed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN Staff #21) was reviewed and revealed section E, item number 5 as emergency department or outpatient transfer checklist. The items listed in this checklist were as follows: a) X-Ray b) Medication list c) Lab results d) Care plan goals e) MOLST f) Face sheet g) Other info h) Bed Hold i) Notice of Transfer, with an instruction to print these documents in this order and include with the transfer form to send with the patient to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to orient, prepare, and document a resident's preparation for a transfer to the hospital. This was identified for 1 (Resident #27) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: On 2/27/24 at 11:00 AM, a review of Resident #27's electronic health record (EHR) revealed that Resident #27 was transferred to an acute care facility on 2/2/24. In a SBAR Summary for Providers note, on 2/2/24 at 12:24 PM, the nurse documented Resident #27 had a change in condition, the primary care provider was notified, and recommended that Resident #27 be sent to the hospital. Continued review of the medical record failed to reveal any documentation to indicate that Resident #27 was oriented and prepared for the transfer or received an explanation as to why s/he was being transferred to the hospital, in a manner that the resident could understand and there was no documentation of the resident's potential response or understanding of the transfer. The above concerns were discussed with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 3 (#15, #33, #6) of 44 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure that each Resident receives the care they need. A Discharge-return anticipated MDS assessment is completed when a resident is temporarily admitted for acute care in the hospital, or a hospital observation stay lasts more than 24 hours, but the resident is expected to return to the nursing facility. 1) On 2/20/24 at 1:12 PM during an initial rounding of the facility, Resident #15 was observed sitting in his/her room receiving oxygen at 2 Liters (L)per minute via nasal cannula. A record review completed for Resident #15 on 2/21/24 at 10:00 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Level II Preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) screen was completed by Adult Evaluation and Review Services (AERS) before the resident's admission. This was evident for 1 (Resident #9) of 1 resident reviewed for PASARR compliance. The findings include: On 02/21/24 at 11:53 AM, the medical record review of Resident #9, revealed that a scanned copy of PASARR level one, dated 05/06/2020, was available from electronic medical records. PASARR form page 2 indicated that If questions 1.2.or three checked yes or if all answers in part D are No the individual must be referred to AERS for level two evaluation. Page 2, Part D, questions 1,2,3,4, and 5 had answers checked as No. Thus indicating a referral to AERS was required. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal the evidence that PASARR, dated 5/6/2020, was referred to AERS for level two evaluation. The PASARR process requires that all applicants to Medicaid-certified nursing facilities be screened for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of medical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and or their representative with a summary of the baseline care plan. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 119 ) of 33 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The findings include: On 02/28/24 at 04:17 PM, a review of Resident #119's medical record revealed that the resident was initially admitted to the facility in February 2024. Further review of medical records failed to reveal that a copy of the baseline care plan was offered to the resident or the resident's representative. On 3/4/24 at 11:10 AM, facility provided a copy of the Interdisciplinary Care Conference attendance record for an initial care conference held on 2/6/24 that revealed neither the resident nor the Resident Representative attended the meeting. Further review of the Interdisciplinary Care Conference Attendance Record form revealed the following statement Resident and/or Resident Representative will be invited to all Interdisciplinary Care Conferences. In instances where the Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) provide a resident with the amount of assistance needed during meals, according to the facility's assessment of the resident ability to feed himself, and 2) ensure that a resident who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) was assisted with putting his/her dentures in their mouth during meal times. This was evident for 1 (Resident #23) of 2 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and for 1 (#15) of 5 residents reviewed for Dental. The findings include: 1) On 2/26/24 at 8:25 AM, Resident # 23, a long-term resident was interviewed. During the interview the resident reported s/he was unable to eat all their breakfast that morning. They reported that s/he had kept dropping their food and was only able eat a couple pieces of bacon. On 2/29/24, the GNA tasks documentation was reviewed. For the question regarding the Resident #23's ability to use suitable utensils to bring food and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the administration of a complete course of antibiotics as ordered. This was evidenced for 1 (Resident #118) out of 5 residents reviewed for un necessary medication. The findings include: On 02/29/24 at 4:00 PM, a record review for Resident #118 revealed that, on 02/06/2024 at 3:13 PM, a new order was placed for an antibiotic to be given every 12 hours for 7 days for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). On 02/29/2024 at 11:10 AM, review of Resident #118's Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated that the first two doses of the antibiotics, scheduled to be given on 02/06/2024 at 8 PM & 02/07/2024 at 8 AM were not administered, resulting in only 12 of 14 doses of the antibiotic being administered. A nurse's progress note with a date of 2/06/24 at 11:10 PM indicated, pending pharmacy delivery for Resident #118's antibiotic. A review of Resident #118 ' s medical record failed to reveal documentation indicating that Resident #118's physician was made aware, nor that there was any change to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure and check the functionality of the wander guard, as ordered. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 119) of 1 Resident reviewed for potential elopement during the survey. The findings include: On 02/22/24 at 08:44 AM, Surveyor observed that Resident #119 had a wander guard on the resident's ankle. A Wander guard bracelet is a technology to safegurd residents at risk of wandering. It has a a sensor that monitors doors and a technology platform that sends safety alerts in real-time when residents get close to the doors. On 02/26/24 at 09:18 AM, a medical record review revealed that the physician ordered to monitor the wander guard device function and placement every shift, dated 02/05/24. Monitoring to ensure the placement of the wander guard and to check the function of the wander guard orders were combined and it was signed on the treatment administration record (TAR). A review of the February 2024 TAR revealed that monitoring and the function of the wander guard order was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that colostomy care was provided to a resident with a colostomy. This was evident for 1 (#15) of 1 resident reviewed with a colostomy. The findings include: The Minimum Data set (MDS) assessment is a federally mandated assessment tool that nursing home staff use to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. A medical record review done on 2/23/24 at 10:20 AM for Resident #15 revealed a care plan, initiated on 8/24/14 and revised on 3/9/22, that recorded that Resident #15 had a colostomy use status. A continued record review showed a progress note, dated 12/14/23,that the Resident had a diagnosis of cognitive impairment, completed by Resident #15's attending provider. A subsequent record review completed on 2/23/24 at 10:51 AM revealed an order summary report of January 2024 that revealed an attending provider's orders for 1) colostomy care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physicians' orders for the administration of oxygen. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 17) of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care during a survey. The findings include: On 2/21/24, review of records revealed that Resident #17 was a long-term care resident of the facility. On 2/28/24 at 9:13 AM, a review of orders revealed an order with a start date of 2/20/24 for oxygen at 2 LPM (liters per minute) via NC (nasal cannula) as needed. May titrate to maintain O2 sats above 92% every 24 hours as needed for SOB, (Shortness of Breath). Supplemental Oxygen is a prescribed drug and is normally delivered by a nasal cannula. A nasal cannula is a thin, flexible tube that wraps around your head, typically hooking around your ears. On one end, it has two prongs that sit in your nostrils and deliver oxygen. The other end of the tube connects to an oxygen supply. There are several different types of oxygen supply delivery systems. The type of oxygen delivery system you use depends on your…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain managementwas provided to the resident that was consistent with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #16) of 3 residents reviewed for pain management. The findings include: Resident #16 was admitted to the facility in late 2023. On 2/21/24 at 1:12 PM, the resident was interviewed about pain management and reported that there had been several occasions where his/her pain medications were administered late or the dose was skipped. On 2/23/24 at 9:22 AM, a review of Resident #16's medical record indicated that the resident was sent to the hospital in November of 2023 due to a fall that resulted in a fractured hip and was readmitted in December 2023. On 2/26/23 at 10:38 AM, Resident #16's pain medication orders were reviewed. The review revealed an order for Oxycodone 10MG to be administered every 4 hours starting on 12/13/23 at 9 PM to 1/12/24 at 5 PM and restarted on 1/13/24 at 1 PM to 2/12/24 at 9 AM. On 2/13/24, the order for the 10MG Oxycodone was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the surveyor's observation, record review, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to assess safety or obtain a physician's order before initiating the usage of side rails, review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent. This was evident for 2 (Residents #6, and #9) of 2 residents reviewed for side rails. The findings include: 1) On 02/21/24, a record review revealed that Resident #6 had resided at the facility for more than a year. On 2/21/24 at 12:33 PM, observed the resident in bed with the bed rail up on the left side of the bed. On 2/21/24, medical record review failed to reveal a physician order, a safety screening, a consent either from the resident or from family, or a care plan reflecting the bed rail usage. The facility provided a copy of informed consent for the installation of a bed rail or assist bar not used as a restraint, dated 02/22/2024. A review of the policy # NS1293-01Safe use of bed rails procedure revealed that step VI a) physician order is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records review, interviews, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a care plan that reflects an individualized, person-centered approach with measurable goals and specific interventions to care for and treat a resident with dementia. This was evident for 1 (Resident #38) of 1 resident reviewed for dementia care.The findings include: Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in late 2023. The resident's medical records indicated active diagnoses of, but not limited to, non-traumatic brain dysfunction, dementia, depression, impairment in both sides of the lower extremity, and sever cognitive impairment. During the survey, 3 of the 4 times Resident #38 was observed, no activity was being provided. On 3/01/24 at 3:33 PM, the residents care plan was reviewed and indicated that the resident had specific health practices, beliefs/values, cultural needs/preferences, and/or linguistic needs/preferences. On the same day at 4:16 PM, the activity preference interview signed by the Activities Director (AD Staff #27) on 12/29/23 was reviewed and revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of medical records and narcotic count sheets, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to keep an accurate record of controlled substances. This was found to be evident for 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed during a facility recertification survey. The findings include: On 3/04/24 at 11:30 AM, the narcotic count sheet binder for the ground floor was provided by the Registered nurse on duty (RN Staff #12). The narcotic count sheet revealed columns for the amount, date and time, amount used, amount wasted, administered by, and amount remaining. A count of all the narcotics in the ground floor medication cart was conducted with Staff #12, but before initiating the count, Staff #12 reported to the surveyor that there were medications that they had already administered to several residents but had not signed off from the narcotic count sheets. The count with Staff #12 revealed 1) Resident #1, had 6 Pregabalin capsules but the narcotic count sheet indicated 7; had 25 Oxycodone tablets but the narcotic count sheet indicated 26. 2) Resident #50 had 24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on pertinent documentation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement the pharmacy and physician recommendations. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 17) out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication during a survey. On 2/21/24, review of records revealed that Resident #17 was a long-term care resident at the facility. On 2/23/24 at 12:26 PM, a review of the monthly pharmacy review, dated 1/1/24, for Resident #17 revealed the following pharmacist recommendation: Please consider monitoring a fasting lipid panel on the next convenient lab day and annually thereafter. On 2/23/24 at 12:30 PM, review of Resident # 17 physician orders failed to reveal an order for an annual lipid panel. On 2/23/24, the surveyor requested pharmacy reviews for Resident #17 and the physician or providers response to the recommendations. On 3/01/24 08:15 AM, a review of the physician prescriber/response to the pharmacist recommendation revealed a physician/prescriber signature, dated 2/5/24, and a handwritten OK. On 3/01/24 at 9:13 AM, a review of physician orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to document adequate monitoring and indication after administering pain medication. This was evident for 1 (Resident #16) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Resident #16 was admitted to the facility in late 2023. During the initial pool process interview, the resident raised some concerns about pain management. On 2/26/23 at 10:38 AM, a review of the resident's pain medication orders revealed the resident was on 10MG Oxycodone to be administered every 6 hours as needed for pain with a start date of 2/13/24. Oxycodone is used to relieve pain severe enough to require opioid treatment and when other pain medicines do not work well enough or cannot be tolerated. It belongs to the group of medicines called narcotic analgesics (pain medicines). Narcotic pain medications have significant side effects and the potential for abuse. As a result, it is a standard of nursing practice to administer narcotic medication only from sources that can be both accounted for and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have a medication administration error of less than 5%. This was evident for 2 of 3 nurses observed for medication administration. The findings include: 1) An observation of the Registered Nurse (RN Staff #31) on 3/1/24 at 9:42 AM, of her preparation and administration of Resident #18's medications revealed several items on her computer that appeared bright pink. Staff #31 reported these items were the orders for the resident's lidocaine patches that were behind schedule. Staff #31 proceeded to pull Resident #18's medications one by one in a medicine cup as she verified each one from the computer on the medication cart. Included with the medications she prepared were, but not limited to, mucus relief DM guaifenesin and dextromethorphan HBr extended-release 600mg/30 Mg, and redness reliever eye drops (active ingredient tetrahydrozoline HCL 0.5%). After the medication administration observation of Staff #31, at 10:23 AM, she reported that she was done signing the electronic medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure expired medications were disposed of properly. This deficient practice was found to be evident for 1 of 1 medication storage room and 2 of 2 medication carts observed during medication storage and labeling inspection. The findings include: On 3/4/24 at 11 AM, an observation of the facility's medication storage room on the ground floor, in the presence of a Registered Nurse (RN Staff #12), revealed an unopened bottle of Vitamin C that expired on 1/24, on the shelf with other unexpired Vitamin C bottles. Staff #12 removed the bottle and indicated that it would be disposed of. On 3/04/24 at 1:31 PM, an observation of the medication cart on the 2nd floor, in the presence of an RN (Staff #5), revealed 1) a bottle of Vitamin B12 100mcg expired on 6/23, 2) Magnesium Chloride with Calcium expired on 11/23, 3) Zinc 50 MG expired on 1/24, and 4) Bisacodyl 5MG expired on 2/24. As the surveyor was inspecting the medication cart, at 1:42 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) arrived and saw the bottles of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0914 — isolatedProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide full visual privacy for residents in non-private rooms. This was evident for 6 beds of the 2 floors observed during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 2/20/24 at 1:19 PM, an observation was made of room [ROOM NUMBER]. Bed A did not have suspended curtains to provide visual privacy and bed B had a curtain but only covered one side of the bed. On 2/28/24 at 2:43 PM, the resident's family member who occupied bed A in room [ROOM NUMBER] was interviewed and s/he indicated that there had not been a curtain to provide full visual privacy for several months. On 3/1/24 at 5:34 PM, a tour of the 1st and 2nd floor was conducted to identify other beds with the same concern. The observation revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A and B; room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A and B; room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A; and room [ROOM NUMBER] bed B, did not have curtains that extended around the bed or in combination with adjacent walls and curtains…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of abuse within 2 hours of the allegation to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This was evident for 4 (#25, #22, #7, #41) of 21 residents reviewed for incidents related to facility reported incidents during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 12/11/23 at 10:02 AM a review of facility reported incident MD00194116 revealed on 7/5/23 Resident #25 alleged that geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) #30 was rough while providing care. Review of the facility's investigation revealed an email confirmation that documented the allegation was first reported to OHCQ on 7/6/23 at 5:50 PM and was not within the 2-hour timeframe for an allegation of abuse. Review of the facility staff interviews and statements documented that GNA #30 reported the allegation to licensed practical nurse (LPN) #14 on 7/5/23. On 12/11/23 at 2:46 PM Staff #12 was interviewed. Staff #12 confirmed that GNA #30 stated she reported the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 4 (#44, #30, #38, #47) of 52 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) On 12/7/23 at 8:06 AM a review of Resident #44's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in October 2023 with diagnoses that included alcohol use disorder. A 10/17/23 care plan note documented that Resident #44 began to tell the police that he/she wanted to leave the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors as evidenced by failing to follow a physician's order related to holding blood pressure medications if outside of physician ordered parameters. This was evident for 1 (#30) of 52 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Blood pressure is a measurement of the pressure that the blood places on the arteries as it is moving through the arteries. The top number is the systolic pressure, which is a measurement of the pressure when the heart pumps the blood out into the arteries. The bottom number is the diastolic pressure which is a measurement of the pressure when the heart is between beats (resting). On 12/11/23 at 11:03 AM Resident #30's medical record was reviewed and revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility in July 2021 with diagnoses that included repeated falls, dementia, traumatic hemorrhage of cerebrum, and traumatic subdural hemorrhage. Review of physician's orders for Resident #30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility documentation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop, implement and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff for the care of residents with a tracheostomy (Resident #46). This was evident for 1 of 1 residents with tracheostomies in the facility reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #46's medical record on 12/12/23 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with diagnosis to include tracheostomy. A tracheostomy is an opening created at the front of the neck so a tube can be inserted into the windpipe (trachea) to help you breathe. Observation of Resident #46 on 12/12/23 at 12:10 PM revealed the Resident to have a tracheostomy with a suction canister and suction tubing dated 12/4/23. Observation also at that time revealed the Resident's oxygen tubing and humidification bottle was not dated or initialed by staff. At that time the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. This was on 2 of 3 nursing units of the facility during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 12/12/23 at 8:30 AM observation was made of Resident #24 lying in bed. Resident #24's breakfast tray was sitting on the over the bed tray table. The laminate on the over the bed tray table was peeled off on the right side of the table approximately 8 to 10 inches. The back wall by the resident's bed was observed to have an area of white spackle on the wall. On 12/14/23 at 10:48 AM Resident #41 was lying in bed on top of a fitted sheet which was torn and had holes throughout the sheet. On 12/14/23 at 10:50 AM Resident #27 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the common area. There was no armrest on the right side of the wheelchair. The vinyl on the left armrest was missing. Observation was then made in Resident #27's room. The laminate on the over the bed tray table was peeling on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of complaint, medical record review, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a care plan meeting was held at least quarterly and included the resident's representative. This was evident for 1 (#11) of 30 complaints reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. On 12/6/23 at 11:47 AM complaint MD00177360 was reviewed and alleged that Resident #11 had not had a care plan meeting in 2 years. On 12/6/23 at 11:47 AM Resident #11's medical record was reviewed and revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility in February 2019 and discharged from the facility in June 2023. Resident #11's medical record documented that the complainant was Resident #11's guardian. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed documentation that care plan meetings were held on 3/25/19, 10/1/20, 1/22/21, 7/11/22, 8/9/22, 12/22/22, and 2/23/23. There were no care plan meetings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician (Resident #32). This was evident for 1 of 52 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical record on 12/12/23 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital. A. Further review of Resident's medical record revealed on 2/17/23 the physician ordered the Resident to have Prednisone 40 mg one time a day for 5 days with a start date of 2/18/23. Review of Resident #32's February 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the facility staff documented on 2/18/23 the medication was not available. On 2/19/23 and 2/20/23 the facility staff did not administer Prednisone. On 2/20/23 the physician reordered Prednisone 40 mg one time a day for 5 days with a start date of 2/21/23. Review of Resident #32's February 2023 MAR revealed the facility staff documented the facility administered Prednisone 40 mg on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide treatment/services to prevent/heal pressures ulcers per the Wound Specialist recommendations (Resident #4 and #6). This is evident for 2 of 52 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings included: A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according the their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II ( superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III ( full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and / or eschar in the wound bed). A deep tissue injury (DTI) is a unique form of pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility staff failed to supervise residents to prevent accidents (Resident #28 and #50) . This was evident for 2 of 25 residents on the 2nd floor of the facility. The findings include: Observation of 2nd floor staffing board on 12/13/23 at 8:07 AM revealed a census of 25 residents with 1 nurse and 2 geriatric nursing assistants (GNAs) for 7 AM - 3 PM shift with a floater GNA. Observation of staff on the unit at that time revealed 1 nurse (Staff #23) and 1 GNA (Staff #7). Observation of Resident #28 on 12/13/23 at 8:10 AM was walking down hallway and walked into Resident #50's room. The Surveyor followed Resident #28 into Resident #50's room and observed Resident #28 eating off Resident #50's breakfast tray. Staff #7 entered the room at 8:11 AM and intervened walking Resident #28 out of Resident #50's room. During interview with Staff #7 on 12/13/23 at 8:12 AM, Staff #7 was asked where the other GNA (Staff #3) was and she stated at that time Staff #3 is downstairs getting clothing. During interview of Staff #23 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility policy review, observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide services for a resident receiving oxygen therapy (Resident #46). This was evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed with oxygen therapy during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #46's medical record on 12/12/23 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with diagnosis to include tracheostomy. A tracheostomy is an opening created at the front of the neck so a tube can be inserted into the windpipe (trachea) to help you breathe. Observation of Resident #46 on 12/12/23 at 12:10 PM revealed the Resident to have a tracheostomy with a suction canister and suction tubing dated 12/4/23. Observation also at that time revealed the Resident's oxygen tubing and humidification bottle was not dated or initialed by staff. At that time the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was called to the Resident room and confirmed the Surveyor's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to keep medication carts locked when unattended. This was evident on 1 of 3 nursing units observed during random observations made during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 12/12/23 at 7:00 AM observation was made of an unlocked and unattended medication cart sitting in front of the nursing station on the 100-nursing unit. The surveyor was able to open all the drawers and go through the cart which contained insulin supplies and resident medications in the first drawer, and resident medication cards in the other drawers. On 12/12/23 at 7:02 AM Registered Nurse (RN) #19 came out of a door and asked the surveyor if she was done at the medication cart. The surveyor asked RN #19 if he realized he left the medication cart unlocked and unattended. RN #19 stated, yes, I know. I was only gone for a minute. I had to run upstairs. On 12/14/23 at 8:27 AM observation was made of an unlocked and unattended medication cart sitting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards (Resident #16, #46) This was evident for 2 of 52 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1. The facility staff failed to have a consultant report in Resident #16's medical record. Review of Resident #16's medical record on 12/13/23 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital. During interview with the Resident's representative (RP) on 5/13/22 at 11:00 AM, the RP stated the Resident was taken out of the facility for an appointment in December 2022 by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to follow infection prevention and control practices. This was evident in the kitchen while preparing food for residents. The failure to follow effective infection prevention and control practices increased the risk for the spread of infection to all residents, staff, and visitors in the building during an active COVID-19 outbreak. The findings include: On 12/12/23 at 9:44 AM observation was made in the kitchen of dietary Staff #26 and Staff #27 at the food preparation table. The 2 staff members were preparing food. Both staff members were wearing a face mask that was positioned under their chins and not covering their nose and mouth. As the surveyor stood and observed the staff, their masks remained positioned under their chins. At the time of the observation there was an active COVID-19 outbreak in the facility where all staff were required to wear masks while in the building. On 12/12/23 at 10:30 AM an interview was conducted with the Infection Control Preventionist, Staff #10 and the Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide Resident (#53) with the most dignified existence. This was evident for 1 of 37 residents selected for dignity during the annual survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #53 revealed on 11/23/18, the physician ordered: supervise at all meals and assist when he/she stops eating. Surveyor observation of Resident #53 on 4/12/19 at 12:30 PM revealed Resident #53 was served lunch, in the dining room with approximately 11 other residents. Further observation revealed the resident was served: breaded fish, noodles, peas, fruit cocktail and a carton of health shake. Further observation revealed the facility staff opened the health shake, of which the resident drank. Further observation revealed, Resident ate the fruit cocktail by putting the bowl to his/her mouth and consuming the food from the bowl. Further observation revealed the facility staff walking past Resident #53 and asking if Resident #53 was going to eat; however, there was no evidence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure an advance directive was in place for Residents (#52 and #53). This was evident for 2 of 3 residents selected for review of advance directives and 2 of 37 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: An advance directive is a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor. It is a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness or incapacity. The (Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) MOLST is a portable and enduring medical order form covering options for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and other life-sustaining treatments or do-not-resuscitate order (DNR). DNR order, is a medical order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the guardian of person of a change of condition for Resident (#11) and failed to complete a change of condition form for Resident (#11). This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for change of condition and 1 of 37 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: 1 A. The facility staff failed to notify the guardian of person of a change in condition for Resident #11. Medical record review for Resident #11 revealed the facility staff nurse #1 documented the resident's temperature of 102 approximately 4/15/19 at 8:30 AM. The resident was medicated with standing order of Tylenol and the physician notified. The physician assessed the resident at 12:30 PM and ordered laboratory blood tests and x-rays. Further record review revealed no evidence the facility staff notified the resident's guardian of person of the temperature and the ordered test. 1 B. The facility staff failed to complete a change in condition form for Resident #11. Medical record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. The findings include: On 4/10/2019 at 9:59 AM during an initial tour of the facility the following observations were made: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] had loose door handles on the hallway door and bathroom door 2. The bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] had a leaky faucet and brown stains on the ceiling tiles around the sprinkler. On 4/11/2019 during resident observation and interview the following observations were made: 1. The first-floor hand sink opposite the elevator had chipped surfaces that are not easily cleanable and may harbor bacteria. 2. A bariatric wheelchair was observed on the first floor to be in disrepair. The stitching was busted on the top of the chair exposing the foam cushioning underneath. This surface is no longer easily cleanable. The Director of Maintenance was informed of these findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate the allegation of abuse-misappropriation of property for a resident (#67). This was evident for 1 of 2 residents selected for review of misappropriation of property and 1 of 37 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: The purpose of a thorough investigation is first to determine if abuse or misappropriation of property of the resident has occurred. It is the expectation that any allegation of abuse or injury of unknown occurrence being investigated by the facility. This investigation includes interviews with all direct care giver staff for a least 1-2 days prior to the reported allegation. Surveyor investigation of MD00130006 revealed Resident #67 was missing $100.00 from a locked drawer in his/her room. Further investigation revealed Resident #67 indicated $276.00 was in the inner drawer of the dresser. It was stated by the resident the inner drawer was locked and the key was kept around the resident's neck. It was stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility staff failed to have a system in place to ensure that the transfer of the resident's medical record and appropriate information is communicated to the receiving health care provider. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 3 (#55 and # 222) residents reviewed for hospitalization during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: The facility staff failed to meet the requirement for transfer information. If the resident is being transferred, and return is expected, the following information must be conveyed to the receiving provider: 1. Resident representative information, including contact information. 2. Advance directive information. 3. The resident's comprehensive care plan goals. 4. Medications (including when last received) 5. Most recent relevant labs, other diagnostic tests. The facility must ensure that the transfer or discharge is documented in the resident's medical record and, who is responsible for making the documentation. 1. A medical record review for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on complaint, reviews of a closed record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify residents and/or representative and the Ombudsman of transfer and reason for transfer to the hospital in writing. This was evident for 2 (Resident #55 and #222) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 3/11/2019. There was no documentation found in the medical record that the resident, the resident's responsible party, or the Ombudsman was given written notice of Resident #55 being transferred to the hospital and the reason for the transfer to the hospital. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #222 revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 9/20/2018. There was no documentation found in the medical record that the resident or the resident's responsible party was given written notice of Resident #222 being transferred to the hospital and the reason…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide the resident and their representative with a written notice of bed hold policy, at the time of the resident transfer for hospitalization. This was evident for 2 (Resident # 55 and #222) of 3 residents reviewed for Hospitalization during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 3/11/2019 and returned to the facility on 3/15/2019. There was no documentation found in the medical record that the resident or the resident's responsible party was given a copy of the bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #222 revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 9/20/2018. There was no documentation found in the medical record that the resident or the resident's responsible party was given a copy of the bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital. On 4/15/19 at 11:00 AM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to assess Resident (#67) for PASARR. This was evident for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR's during the annual survey process. The findings include: The Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) must be completed by either the nursing facility or the referring doctor for every individual who will be admitted to a nursing facility to identify individuals who may have Mental Illness (MI), Intellectual Disability (ID), and/or Related Condition (RC). The nursing facility is responsible for ensuring a Level I screen is completed for everyone prior to admission. The PASRR determines whether an individual who has an active diagnosis of Mental Illness (MI) or Intellectual/Developmental Disability (ID/DD) meets the criteria for admission to a nursing facility and may require specialized services. PASARR is required for all persons seeking admission to Medicaid certified nursing facilities, regardless of whether their stay at the nursing facility will be paid for by Medicaid,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide an environment which produced the highest level for practicable well-being for Residents (#1, #26 and #49). This was evident for 3 of 37 residents selected for review of during the annual survey for well-being. The findings are 1. The facility staff failed to clarify and correct a physician's order for Resident #1. Medical record review for Resident #1 revealed on 3/1/18 the physician ordered: Weigh patient monthly every day shift every 1 month(s) starting on the 1st for 28 day(s). Review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed the facility staff transcribed the resident's weight to be obtained every day during the month; however, further record review revealed the last documented weight for Resident #1 was 11/11/18. Record review no evidence of Resident #1 refusing weights except on 4/15/19. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 4/15/19 at 12:00 PM revealed the facility staff failed to transcribe the physician's order correctly to reveal a weight to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to apply leg rest to the wheel chair of Resident (#53) as ordered and failed to apply fall mats to both sides of the bed as ordered for Resident (#53). This was evident for 1 of resident selected for review of accidents and 1 of 37 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #53 with leg rest for the wheelchair as ordered. Medical record review for Resident #53 revealed on 8/6/18 the physician ordered: high back wheelchair, pommel cushion, leg rest with foot board to prevent falls. A pommel cushion is a gel filled cushion designed to prevent the resident from sliding forward, promotes proper hip and knee alignment and the pommel helps keep residents in position. Surveyor observation of resident #53 on 4/ 12/19 at 12:26 PM and 4/15/19 at 12:00 PM revealed the resident out of bed, in a high back wheelchair with a pommel cushion; however, the facility staff failed to apply leg rest with foot board for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to thoroughly assess the need for pain medication and medicate Resident (#44). This was evident for 1 of 1 resident selected for review of pain assessment and 1 of 37 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: Pain is often regarded as the fifth vital sign regarding healthcare because it is accepted now in healthcare that pain, like other vital signs, is an objective sensation rather than subjective. As a result, nurses are trained and expected to assess pain. A component of pain assessment-focusing on words to describe pain, intensity, location, duration, and aggravating or alleviating factors. It is the expectation the facility staff assess pain prior to and after the administration of pain medication to determine the need of the medication and the effectiveness of the medication. Medical record review for Resident #44 revealed on 3/9/18 the physician ordered: Tylenol Arthritis Pain Tablet Extended Release 500 milligrams by mouth every 8 hours as needed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-16 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff Social Worker (SW) failed to complete Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for Resident #67. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR's during the annual survey process. The findings include: The Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) must be completed by either the nursing facility or the referring doctor for every individual who will be admitted to a nursing facility to identify individuals who may have Mental Illness (MI), Intellectual Disability (ID), and/or Related Condition (RC). The nursing facility is responsible for ensuring a Level I screen is completed for everyone prior to admission. The PASRR determines whether an individual who has an active diagnosis of Mental Illness (MI) or Intellectual/Developmental Disability (ID/DD) meets the criteria for admission to a nursing facility and may require specialized services. PASARR is required for all persons seeking admission to Medicaid certified nursing facilities, regardless of whether their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure medications were thoroughly labeled with residents' name and dated the medication was open. This was evident for 1 of 37 medication carts observed during the annual survey process. The findings include: Observation of the medication cart on 4/16/19 at 10:00 AM revealed the following observations: 1. The medication cart on the ground floor had a bottle of eye drops Timolol Maleate with no name on the bottle to determine which resident it was to be administered to. 2. The medication cart on the ground floor had a bottle of eye drops Dorzolamide with no open date. 3. The medication cart on the ground floor had a bottle of Nasacort nasal spray with no open date. 4. The medication cart on the 1st floor had the following insulin medications with no open dates, Lantus, Victoza, Humalog, Novolog and two Basaglar pens. 5. The medication cart on the 1st floor had the following bottles of eye drops with no open dates, Simbrinza, Bepreve, and Dorzolamide. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 4/16/19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain laboratory blood test as ordered for Residents (#44 and #52). This was evident for 2 of 37 residents selected for review of laboratory results in the survey sample. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to obtain laboratory blood specimen for Resident #44 as ordered. Medical record review for Resident #44 revealed on 2/11/19 the physician ordered: CBC, BMP, CRP and ESR every Thursday for 3 weeks. A complete blood count (CBC) is a test that measures the cells that make up the blood: red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. A complete blood count (CBC) is a blood test used to evaluate overall health and detect a wide range of disorders, including anemia, infection and leukemia. A basic metabolic panel is a blood test that measures the sugar (glucose) level, electrolyte and fluid balance, and kidney function, this panel measures the blood levels of blood urea nitrogen (BUN), calcium, carbon dioxide, chloride, creatinine, glucose, potassium, and sodium. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide Resident (#52) with nectar thick water as ordered by the physician. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident selected for review of nutrition and 1 of 37 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #52 revealed on 2/28/19 the physician ordered: nectar thick liquids including bedside water. Nectar-thick liquids - are easily pourable and comparable to apricot nectar or thicker cream soups. Surveyor observation of Resident #52's room on 4/15/19 at 12:05 PM revealed the facility staff failed to provide nectar thick water at the bedside for Resident #52. Further observation revealed the resident had a thin water pitcher dated 4/15/19. The Director of Nursing was notified, and it was revealed that the water pitcher had come from the night shift. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 4/16/19 at 1:30 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to provide Resident #52 with nectar thick water at the bedside as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain the medical record in the most complete and accurate form for Residents (#49). This was evident for 2 of 37 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. The facility staff failed to maintain the medical record in the most complete form for resident #49 Medical record review for Resident #49 revealed: 1. Medical record review for Resident #49 revealed on 3/8/19 the physician ordered: ace bandage wrap apply in the morning and off at bedtime for edema and remove per schedule. On 4/11/19 and 4/12/19 a nurse's note revealed that the nurse signed the Treatment Assessment Record indicating that Resident # 49 had the ace wraps applied. Surveyor observation of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observations and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to promote an environment that decreased the potential of transmission of communicable diseases or infections for Residents (#10, #52 and #65). This was evident for observations of dining in 2 of the 3 dining rooms and 3 out of 37 residents selected for infection control during the survey process. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to promote an environment free from the potential of transmission of communicable diseases or infections. Based on observation of lunch in the second-floor dining room on 4/15/19 at 12:34 PM revealed facility staff Geriatric Nursing Assistant #1 was noted to have bare hand food contact with Residents # 10's food. Further observations at that time revealed the resident was served a slice of ham. It was also noted a piece of white bread on the food tray. Facility staff GNA #1, using bare hands, placed the piece of ham on the bread and folded the bread to make a sandwich and provided to the resident. 2. The facility staff failed to promote…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents had a means of directly contacting staff. This was evident in 1 public bathroom accessible to residents and 1 resident bathroom. The findings include: 1. On 4/11/2019 at 09:21 AM and 4/15/2019 at 10:21 AM surveyors observed the call light system in the public/staff bathroom on the first floor. This door is not locked and can be accessed by residents. The chord for the call light system was wrapped around the toilet grab bar multiple times preventing the call light system from being activated by pulling the chord. Interview of the Maintenance Director revealed that residents may sometimes wrap the chord around the grab bar themselves. If this bathroom is accessible to residents the facility must ensure they have a means of directly contacting staff in the event of an emergency. 2. On 4/16/2019 at 10:00 AM during a Resident Council meeting, Resident #19 stated that the call light in their bathroom was not operable and had not been for months. At 11:01 AM the bathroom call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-16 · tag F0923 — isolatedHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have adequate ventilation in resident bathrooms. This was evident for 2 resident bathrooms observed on the 1st floor of the facility. The findings include: Observation of resident rooms/bathrooms on 4/10/2019 at 10:35 AM revealed that exhaust fans were not operational in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. The bathrooms had a lingering smell of feces due to the lack of airflow. Interview with Staff #5 confirmed that the wall switches should trigger the bathroom fans when the lights come on. Staff #5 stated they would inform maintenance of the issue. At 1:09 PM the Director of Maintenance confirmed that the lack of airflow was caused by a broken exhaust motor on the roof and had been repaired. The Administrator was made aware of these findings on 4/16/2019 during the exit conference.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2017-12-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and medical record review the facility staff failed to provide all treatments and services as ordered by the physician (Resident #3, #45, #60, #65 and #70). This is evident for 5 out of 30 residents selected for review during the investigation stage of the survey process. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an order on 7/9/16 for Mighty Shakes two times a day at lunch and dinner, document % consumed. Further review of the Resident's Administration Records revealed the facility staff failed to follow the physician order and document the % consumed. Interview with the Director of Nursing and Administrator on 12/12/17 at 9:30 AM confirmed the surveyor's findings. 2. Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed an order on 11/22/17 for fluid aspiration daily via pleurx catheter daily for recurrent pleural effusion. If CT drains less than 50ml/day for 3 consecutive days notify physician, every evening shift Document amount of drainage. Review of the Resident's Treatment Administration Record revealed the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2017-12-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide the most dignified existence for Residents (# 28 and # 63). This was evident for 2 of 30 residents selected for investigation during the survey process. The findings include: Surveyor observation of Resident # 28 and Resident # 63 on 12/11/17 at 8:15 AM revealed the resident's breakfast tray was in the room. The tray was on the bedside table of both residents, to the side of the bed. The residents were not eating (the facility staff indicated both residents were to be fed). There was no facility staff in the room. It was noted the facility staff started collecting dirty trays from residents that had eaten their meal. It was noted that approximately 20 trays had been picked up and placed on the dietary cart. Further surveyor observation revealed no facility staff addressed the resident's breakfast until 8:30 AM; however, the facility staff was collecting dirty trays prior to addressing the breakfast tray for Residents # 28 and Resident # 63. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 12/11/17 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2017-12-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the December 12, 2017 observation of resident bedrooms and bathrooms, it was revealed that there was evidence of unattended maintenance needs in evidence. In addition, observation of the laundry area revealed multiple issues with disrepair. The findings included: 1. A tour of the environment of care was conducted on December 12, 2017 in response to team discussions of prior findings building during a tour on for this survey. Based on this tour, there was evidence of unattended maintenance needs. The following is a summation of those findings. a. room [ROOM NUMBER] was found with marred walls, a hole in the wall along the exterior wall of the room, the bedside table for the window side bed was missing a drawer handle, and the attached bathroom was found where the connected to mechanical ventilation at the ceiling was missing a grille or cover. b. Wall damage near entry to room where some effort of repair using wall compound was noted but application was rough and incomplete, plus the area of repair was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2017-12-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and review of the medical record it was determined the facility failed to initiate a care plan to manage a resident's incontinence (Resident #33). A comprehensive care plan outlines a resident's needs and drives the provision of care as required to meet those needs. Findings include: Review of the medical record on 12/12/17 at 9:10 AM revealed that resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) completed on 9/30/17 revealed that Resident #33 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. A MDS is a complete resident assessment tool used to develop the resident plan of care on admission and then completed quarterly or with a significant change in condition. A second MDS was completed on 10/24/17 following a hospital admission and a change in condition. This MDS also revealed that Resident #33 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Further review of the medical record revealed that facility staff failed to initiate and implement a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2017-12-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to review and revise the interdisciplinary care plans to reveal accurate interventions for residents (# 30 and # 33). This was evident for 2 of 30 residents selected for investigation during the survey process. Findings include: Once the facility staff completes an in-depth assessment of the resident, the interdisciplinary team meet and develop care plans. Care plans provide direction for individualized care of the resident. A care plan flows from each resident's unique list of diagnoses and should be organized by the resident's specific needs. The care plan is a means of communicating and organizing the actions and assure the resident's needs are attended to. The care plan is to be reviewed and revised at each assessment time of the resident to ensure the interventions on the care plan is accurate and appropriate for the resident. 1. Surveyor observation of Resident # 30 at lunch on [DATE] at 12:45 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2017-12-13 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide treatment/services to maintain vision (Resident #46). This is evident for 1 out of 30 residents selected for review during the investigation stage of the survey process. The findings include: During interview with Resident #46 on 12/7/17 at 11:55 AM, the Resident stated he/she is waiting for a follow up appointment with the eye doctor. Review of the Resident's medical record revealed the Resident did see the eye doctor on 7/31/17. The new orders for the Resident at that time were Refresh Tears oph. Solution apply 1 drop, Both eyes, twice daily for 60 days. Referral Ophthalmology Consult. Further review of the medical record revealed the Resident never received the eye drops as ordered and an Ophthalmology Consult was never scheduled. Interview with the Director of Nursing and Administrator on 12/12/17 at 11:00 AM confirmed the surveyor's findings.
- Potential for harm · D2017-12-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide a resident the food as indicated on the meal ticket (#30) or ordered by the dietitian (#61). This was evident for 2 of 30 residents selected for investigation during the survey process. The findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident # 30 revealed the resident was ordered: CCD/NAS- Carbohydrate Controlled Diet/No Added Salt. A carbohydrate controlled diet is a diet in which carbohydrate intake is either limited or set at a value. Setting carbohydrate intake at set values or limits can be used by people with diabetes help stabilize blood glucose levels. A NAS diet is still a balanced diet. It includes grains, fruits, dairy products, meat and vegetables, but the choices made must be lower-sodium choices. The NAS diet allows all milk, all yogurt, all fruits and all breads without salted tops. Vegetables must be fresh or frozen and not canned or pickled. Surveyor observation of Resident # 30's meal ticket on 12/11/17 at 12:45 PM revealed the meal ticket indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2017-12-13 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain psychiatric consultations as ordered by the physician for residents (#45, #61, and #65). This is evident for 3 out of 30 residents selected for review during the investigation stage of the survey process. The findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident # 65 revealed on 11/1/17 the physician ordered: psychiatry consultation and treatment for diagnosis of cancer. Further record review revealed the facility staff failed to obtain that psychiatric consultation. Interview with the Director of Nursing and Administrator on 12/12/17 at 12:10 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to obtain the psychiatric consultation as ordered by the physician. 2. Medical record review for Resident # 61 revealed on 10/26/17 the physician ordered: psychiatry consultation for competency. Further record review revealed the facility staff failed to obtain that psychiatric consultation. Interview with the Director of Nursing and Administrator on 12/11/17 at 10:30 AM confirmed the facility staff failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2017-12-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Consultant Pharmacist recommendations were acted upon accurately and as recommended for Resident (# 23), failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications (# 47), and Consultant Pharmacist failed to identify labs were not done (Resident #9). This is evident for 3 of 30 residents selected for investigation during the survey process. The findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident # 23 revealed on 10/17/13 the physician ordered: Calcium 600 milligrams/Vitamin D 400 milligrams (Mgs) by mouth 2 times day. Calcium is a mineral that is necessary for life. In addition to building bones and keeping them healthy, calcium helps our blood clot, nerves send messages and muscles contract. Vitamin D plays an important role in protecting your bones and your body requires it to absorb calcium. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the facility staff documented the Calcium/Vitamin was administered at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. On 5/4/15 the physician ordered Iron Sulfate 325…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2017-12-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medications (# 47). This was evident for 1 of 30 residents selected for review during the investigation stage of the survey process. The findings include: Review of Resident # 47's medical record revealed the resident had a daily order of aspirin. Low dose of aspirin reduces the risk of stroke and heart attack. On November 7, 2017 the Physician wrote an order to discontinue the aspirin. A reviewed of the medical record revealed that the Resident received aspirin in the month of November and up to December 12, 2017 until surveyor intervention. On 11/07/17 the aspirin should have been discontinued at that time to prevent the Resident from receiving the unnecessary medication. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 12/12/17 at 2:00 PM confirmed that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medications. See F756
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2017-12-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to obtain a medication error rate less than 5 %. This was evident for 2 errors out of 25 opportunities for Residents (# 28) resulting in an error rate of 8%. The findings include: Error # 1: The facility staff failed to administer the correct dose of a medication to a resident. Medical record review of Resident # 28's record revealed on 8/17/16 the physician ordered: Aspirin 325 milligrams (mgs) by mouth every day for prevention of stroke. Aspirin is a pain reliever. It is used to treat mild pain and fever. This medicine is also used as directed by a doctor to prevent and to treat heart attacks, to prevent strokes, and to treat arthritis or inflammation. Review of Medication Administration pass on 12/11/17 at 8:23 AM revealed Certified Medication Aide # 1 attempted to administer Aspirin 81 mg instead of 325 mg. The CMA obtained Aspirin 81 mg from the bulk medication and placed in the medicine cup to administer to the resident. Prior to entering the room and after surveyor intervention,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2017-12-13 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident received ordered laboratory services (# 9). This was true for 1 out of 30 residents selected for review during the investigation stage of the survey process. The evidence is as follows: A review of Resident # 9's clinical record revealed that the resident's primary physician ordered on 9/21/16 for a Liver Function Test (LFT) to be done every three months. Further review revealed that a LFT was done in April 2017 (one month late) but not in June or September 2017. The Director of Nursing was interviewed on 12/13/17 at 12:46 PM. She confirmed that the LFT's were not done as ordered.
- Potential for harm · D2017-12-13 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to obtain a physician's order prior to obtain laboratory blood specimen for a resident (# 63). This was evident for 1 of 30 residents selected for investigation during the survey process. The findings include: Medical record review of Resident # 63's record revealed on 5/31/17 the physician ordered: Liver Function Test (LFT) every 3 months. Liver function tests are blood tests used to help diagnose and monitor liver disease or damage. The tests measure the levels of certain enzymes and proteins in your blood. Some of these tests measure how well the liver is performing its normal functions of producing protein and clearing bilirubin, a blood waste product. Other liver function tests measure enzymes that liver cells release in response to damage or disease. Record review revealed the facility staff obtained the LFT 6/2/17, 8/24/17 and 11/6/17; however, the facility staff also obtained LFT on 7/3/17 and 10/2/17 without evidence of a physicians' order for those laboratory blood test. Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2017-12-13 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide a resident with the nectar thick water as ordered by Speech therapy (#70). This was evident for 1 of 30 residents selected for investigation during the survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident # 70 revealed on 12/8/17 the Speech/Language Therapist ordered: discontinue thin liquids, begin nectar thick liquids by cup sips. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) work to prevent, assess, diagnose, and treat speech, language, social communication, cognitive-communication, and swallowing disorders in children and adults. People who have trouble swallowing thin liquids often thicken liquids to help prevent choking and stop fluids from entering the lungs. Nectar-thick liquids are easily pourable and comparable to apricot nectar or thicker cream soup. Surveyor observation of Medication Administration pass on 12/11/17 at 8:30 AM revealed Certified Medication Aide (CMA) administered medications (Aspirin, Claritin for allergies, Cardizem for blood pressure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2017-12-13 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide residents with assistive devices as ordered (# 28, # 30 and # 70). This was evident for 3 of 30 residents selected for investigation during the survey process. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to provide Resident # 28 a 3 compartment plate as ordered. Meal ticket review for Resident # 28 revealed: 3 compartment plate. The three compartments help keep foods divided so different foods can be prevented from mixing and is designed to increase the dining independence of those who can only use one hand, or those with limited flexibility or motor coordination. Surveyor observation of Resident # 28 on 12/7/17 at 12:45 PM, 12/8/17 at 1:00 PM and 12/11/17 at 12:45 PM revealed the facility staff failed to provide the resident with the 3 compartment plate as noted on the meal ticket. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 12/13/17 at 2:30 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to provide Resident # 28 with a 3 compartment plate. 2. The facility staff failed to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2017-12-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon record review and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure that the resident's medical record was accurate and complete (Resident # 61). This is evident for 1 of 30 residents selected for review during the investigation stage of the survey process. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. Medical record review for Resident # 61 revealed a physician ordered dated 10/24/17 for cervical collar to be worn every shift. A cervical collar is an intervention to immobilize the cervical spine, the neck. It is also used for the treatment of neck pain. Surveyor observation of the resident on 12/07/17 at 10:45 AM and at 1:30PM, 12/08/17 at 8:00 AM and at 2:00 PM, revealed the resident in his room and in the hallway sitting in his wheelchair, however, facility staff failed to apply…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-12-15 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to post a notice of where the results of the most recent surveys, certifications, and complaint investigations were located. This was evident during the first day of the complaint survey. The findings include: On 12/6/23 at 1:08 PM, observation was made of the facility lobby and entrance hallway. There was no sign posted of where the most recent results from the annual and complaint surveys were located. The surveyor looked around the lobby for a survey binder and was unable to locate. The receptionist, Staff #4 was asked where the survey binder could be located, and she got up from her chair and walked over to the hallway where a grievance binder was located on the wall. She then walked back to the receptionist desk and behind her were several binders. The survey results binder was located behind the receptionist's desk. The surveyor asked Staff #4 if she was aware that a sign should be posted letting residents, staff, and the public know where the survey results could be located. She stated she was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2017-12-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations made, interview of staff and measurement of food temperatures measured from two test trays observations by this surveyor, it was found that food was not prepared and served in a manner that the food was attractive, palatable at the proper temperature. In addition, discussions with other surveyors as to dining observation revealed concerns of observed tray delivery delay and food being served to only one resident seated at a table while others at the same table were not served at the same time. The findings included: In response to resident reports as related to concerns of poor food quality, this surveyor was assigned the task to evaluate food as served. As part of the inspection of the kitchen, this surveyor was able to determine that the kitchen was not equipped with the standard equipment per standard of practice that would be employed to maintain hot food temperatures when food was disseminated by tray distribution. The equipment lacking was a base for a heated pellet and the heated pellet. The only approach used by dietary staff at this nursing home was to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-08-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| GROVES, DONNA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2016 |
| ROMEO, DOMINIC | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/01/2023 |
| STOLTZ, CHARLES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2016 |
| WILHEIM, RONALD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2016 |
| STEVENSON MGT, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2016 |
| COUSINS, KAREN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2021 |
| HARDING, ASHLEE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/24/2025 |
| ODENTHAL, RICHARD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/22/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $484K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215204. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.