No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Charleston Healthcare Center

3819 Chesterfield Avenue, Charleston, WV 25304 · For profit - Corporation · 150 certified beds · (304) 925-4771 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (304) 925-4771 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Oct 20241 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$12,831 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $12,831 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-30)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
10 Courtney Dr · (304) 925-3580 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3715 Maccorkle Ave SE · (304) 932-0032 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3808 Maccorkle Ave SE · (304) 415-3077 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2901 Kanawha Blvd E · (304) 348-6860 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3845 Chesterfield Ave · (304) 925-3434

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.2%14.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.4%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.4%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.0%7.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%4.4%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.8%15.9%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.4%27.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.1%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.4%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.2%22.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.2%13.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.6%79.4%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.0%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.3%11.3%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 257 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
77.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 77.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 135 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.2%CMS range 55.2–65.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.4%CMS range 10.6–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge77.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge66.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting94.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.8%CMS range 5.6–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.68
RN hours/ resident / day
1.38
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.12
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
38.9%
Total nursing turnover
35.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 148.2 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.12 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.46 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-02)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-30)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

71 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 60 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to make orthopedic appointments as directed, provide transportation to appointments, obtain documentation from appointments, and follow directions from those appointments to prevent contractures in Resident #88's left arm and hand following a fall at the facility. The State Agency (SA) determined physical harm was caused to Resident #88 when the resident developed contractures in her upper left arm and hand following a fall at the facility. The failure to schedule a follow up appointment with Resident #88's orthopedic doctor in a timely manner, provide transportation, obtain the documentation sent from the appointments, and follow the recommendations from the appointments, resulted in the resident developing contractures in her left arm and hand. This will be cited at past non-compliance due to the facility identifying and correcting the issue on 08/04/23. The facility also failed to administer anticonvulsant and narcotic pain medications, as ordered by the physician to Resident #105, # 51, #79, #494, #93,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #129 and #146. Facility Census: 145.Findings included: The facility's policy and procedure for Resident Rights stated, c. To have a method to communicate needs to staff. i. Call light or bell access will be within reach of the resident as one method to communicate needs to staff. a) Resident #129 - On 03/31/2026 at 11:10 AM, during the initial interview process, Resident #129's call light was observed on the floor. The resident was lying in bed. Nurse Aide #138 confirmed the call light was out of reach and on the floor and stated, I'll fix it and let their CNA know. Resident #129's care plan stated, Place call bell within reach, remind resident to call for assistance.b) Resident #146 On 03/31/2026 at 11:15 AM, during the initial interview process, Resident #146 reported his only problem was he wanted to get back in bed and that he had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative in writing of the reason for transfer/discharge and provide a copy of the bed hold notice. This was found to be true for one (1) of four (4) resident reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier: #19. Facility census: 145. Findings included: a) Resident #19 Record review revealed Resident #19 had three (3) acute transfers in the last 120 days. These included: 01/29/26 - 02/03/26, 02/22/26 - 03/01/26, and 03/04/26 - 03/10/26. During the first two acute transfers, the resident had the capacity to make their own medical decisions. The resident was provided a notice of transfer and bed hold notice. The resident lost her capacity to make her own medical decisions on 03/02/26. On 03/04/26, the resident sustained a fall at the facility and was transferred to the hospital. The resident was provided a transfer notice and bed hold notice. However, since the resident's capacity had changed two days earlier and the resident no longer had the capacity to make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an updated Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed for a resident with a bipolar diagnosis identified after admission. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #153. Facility census: 145. Findings included: Resident #153 a) On 04/01/26 at 9:26 AM, Resident #153's medical chart was reviewed. A diagnosis of Bipolar II Disorder was listed after the resident's admission to the facility in 08/2024. The diagnosis of Bipolar II Disorder was added on 04/04/2025 to the resident's diagnosis list in the medical chart. The resident's most recent Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) dated 11/21/2024 did not have Bipolar Disorder listed or checked under Section 30 of the PASARR. On 04/01/26 at 3:30 PM, the PASSAR and diagnosis list with bipolar diagnosis date were reviewed with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON confirmed the Bipolar II Disorder diagnosis was not listed or marked on the most recent PASARR.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update the comprehensive care plan in a timely manner following a significant change in the resident's mental capacity. This was found to be true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier: #19. Facility census: 145.Findings included: a) Resident #19 Resident #19 had a change in her capacity to make own medical decisions on 03/02/26. Upon initial review of the resident's medical record on day one of the long-term care survey process (03/31/26), the resident's comprehensive care plan stated the resident had capacity to make her own medical decisions. Surveyor requested a copy of the care plan late afternoon on 04/01/26. Upon the surveyor's arrival at the facility the next morning, the care plan was provided. A review of the care plan documented that it had been updated on 04/01/26 to show the resident no longer has capacity. The surveyor reviewed the care plan documentation change with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 04/02/26 at 10:50 AM, showing the DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's orders and care plan matched for a resident ordered Nothing By Mouth (NPO) by the physician. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #56. Facility Census: 145. Findings included:Resident #56 a) On 03/31/2026 at 3:13 PM, Resident #56's medical chart was reviewed. The resident's care plan stated, NPO diet order. and Administer medications per physician orders and flush before/after medication administration per order. The residents diet order stated, NPO diet NPO texture, NPO consistency. A medication order for Norvasc Tablet was stated, Norvasc Tablet (amLODIPine Besylate) Give 5 mg by mouth one time a day for HTN. On 04/01/2026 at 1:40 PM, the Administrator confirmed the order for Nothing by Mouth (NPO), the medication ordered by mouth and the care plan for NPO. The Administrator stated, We will get that taken care of.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon Observation, staff interviews and policy, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections by not dating IV lines for Resident #108 and #60. This was discovered during the normal Long Term Survey Process and has the ability to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers #108, #60. Census: 145.Findings included: a) During the resident interview process performed on 03/31/26 at approximately 1:30 PM it was observed that Resident #108's IV line was not dated and was in use. The Director of Nursing and Unit manager confirmed that there was no date on the IV line. Secondary observation on 03/31/2026 at approximately 2:00PM, Resident #60 had medication running and the IV line was not labeled with date and time when two surveyors went into the room, before they (surveyors) were able to get a staff member to confirm , the nurse took down the set because the medication had finished. Interview with DON at 2:00 PM revaled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary area for storage of equipment and maintain a clean area for all kitchen equipment. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents receiving nourishment from the facility kitchen. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility Census: 142.Findings Include: a) Kitchen On 11/13/25 at 10:00 AM, a 50-gallon trash can with the lid was noted with a dry white substance as well as food debris on the lid of the trash can. The trash can was sitting at the entrance of the dining room. At this time, Dietary Aide #163 was sitting in the dining room. Dietary Aide #163 was notified of the trash can being dirty. Dietary Aide #163 stated, I'll get it taken care of. At this time, the Dietary Aide #163 was asked, Is this where we enter the kitchen? The Dietary Aide stated, yes, I'll get the Manager. A tour of the kitchen began at approximately 8:50 AM. An observation in the storage area found 10-one (1) gallon-sized bottles of hand sanitizers on the bottom shelf in the storage area. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility faild to ensure pressure ulcer assessment and treatment in a timely manner. The facility also failed to ensure pressure ulcer prevention measures were put into place. This deficient practice had the potential to affect three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed for the care area of pressure ulcers. Resident Identifiers: #152, #40, and #. Facility census: 143. Findings included: A) Resident #40 Review of Resident #40's comprehensive care plan showed the following focus, Preventative: [Resident] is at risk for pressure ulcers/injuries related to decreased mobility (dementia/TBI [traumatic brain injury], incontinence of B&B [bowel and bladder] function, HDL [hyperlipidemia], HTN [hypertension]. History of scratching self. [Resident] will hit and bang on walls, his chair, over the bed table and has the potential for bruising. The focus was initiated and revised on 01/16/23. An intervention initiated on 01/16/23 and revised on 03/06/23 was to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident #58's bed was observed with a six (6) inch gap between the footboard and the end of the mattress in addition Resident #98 was noted to be lying in bed and an aerosol spray can of Clorox Fabric Sanitizer was on the resident's overbed table. These were random opportunities for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #58 and #98. Facility Census: 143. Findings Include: A) Resident #58 During an observation on the morning of 10/15/25 Resident #58's bed was observed to have a gap at the foot board which was wide enough to pose a risk for entrapment. The facility's Registered Nurse of Clinical Operations (RNCO) confirmed there was a gap at the foot of the bed between the foot board and the mattress. The RNCO looked in Resident #58's room and no gap filler was located. The surveyor requested the Director of Plan Maintenance measure the gap between the foot board and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure residents maintain acceptable levels of hydration and nutrition. Resident #141, Resident #17, Resident #103, and Resident #40 did not have fresh ice water at bedside. In addition Resident #153 the facility failed to prevent avoidable weight loss. This was true for five (5) of sampled residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Resident Identifiers: #141, #17, #103, #40 and #153. Facility Census: 143. A) Access to Fresh Water An interview on the morning of 10/15/25 with the Director of Nursing and the Nursing Home Administrator it was discovered nursing provides three (3) ice water passes per day. The times of the passes are at 6:00 am, 2:00 pm and 10:00 pm. They also indicated activities do two (2) drink passes during the course of the day as well. An observation with the (DON) beginning at 3:30 pm and concluding at 4:05 PM on 10/15/25 found Resident #141, Resident #17, Resident #103, and Resident #40 did not have ice water pitchers at their bed side. The DON confirmed, night…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 60 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement the care plan regarding the amount of feeding assistance needed as well as develop and implement impaired skin integrity interventions for Resident #153. This was true for one (1) of 18 residents reviewed during the survey process. Facility Census: 143.Findings Include:a1) Resident #153On 10/14/25 at 1:30 AM, a record review was completeid for Resident #153. The review found the care plan had not been implemented regarding feeding assistance. The resident was noted as totally dependent of staff x 1 (one) for eating. The documentation of assistance given during meals from 07/2025 through 09/2025 was reviewed. The following meals were not documented as dependent:--07/15/25 at breakfast, lunch--07/16/25 at dinner--0717/25 all meals--07/18/25 all meals--07/19/25 all meals--07/21/25 all meals--07/22/25 breakfast, lunch--07/23/25 all meals--07/24/25 all meals--07/25/25 all meals--07/27/25 all meals--07/28/25 all meals--07/29/25 all meals--07/30/25 all meals--07/31/25 all meals--08/01/25 all meals--08/02/25 all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADLs) for a dependent resident, #153. The ADLs included feeding assistance as well as showers or baths. This was true for one (1) of 18 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifier: #153. Facility Census: 143. Findings Include:a1) Resident #153On 10/14/25 at 1:30 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #153. The review found the resident had not been provided feeding assistance as a dependent resident for meals. The documentation of assistance given during meals from 07/2025 through 09/2025 was reviewed. The following meals were not documented as dependent:--07/15/25 at breakfast, lunch--07/16/25 at dinner--0717/25 all meals--07/18/25 all meals--07/19/25 all meals--07/21/25 all meals--07/22/25 breakfast, lunch--07/23/25 all meals--07/24/25 all meals--07/25/25 all meals--07/27/25 all meals--07/28/25 all meals--07/29/25 all meals--07/30/25 all meals--07/31/25 all meals--08/01/25 all meals--08/02/25 all meals--08/03/25 all meals--08/04/25 breakfast,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #152's recommendations from a hospital stay were followed up on with the attending physician. The discharge summary indicated the resident should have a BMP (Basic Metabolic Panel) and CBC (complete blood count) in one week from the date of discharge. This labs were not obtained nor was there evidence this was addressed with the attending physician to see if they wanted the lab work to be obtained or not. This was true for one (1) of residents reviewed during the complaint survey. Resident Identifier: #152. Facility Census: 143. Findings Included: a) Resident #152 A review of Resident #152's medical record found the resident was readmitted from the hospital on [DATE]. A review of the hospital discharge summary associated with this readmission found the following, Pending Labs and studies: BMP CBC in one (1) week. In the afternoon on 10/15/25 the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to provide the results of the BMP and CBC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records. For one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for the care area of pressure ulcers, the wound nurse practitioner's note documented the wrong treatment being used. Resident Identifier: #152. Facility census: 143.Findings included:a) Resident #152Review of Resident #152's physician's orders showed an order written on 01/20/25 for skin prep to left great toe pressure injury. The order continued through the resident's discharge from the facility.The resident's medical records documented an allergy to betadine. Wound Nurse Practitioner (NP) #173 assessed the wound weekly and made treatment recommendations. On 01/23/25, 02/04/25, and 02/10/25, NP #173 indicated the resident's left great toe pressure ulcer was being treated with betadine. Beginning 02/19/25, NP #173 correctly indicated the pressure ulcer was being treated with skin prep. On 10/16/25 at 9:45 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed NP #173's weekly treatment recommendations on 01/23/25, 02/04/25, and 02/10/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents had care plans developed for as of area of concern. Resident #68 had suffered fluid volume depletion and did not have a care plan focus area for dehydration. Resident identifier: #68. Facility census: 145. Findings included: a) Resident # 68 During the initial interview on 10/28/24 at 12:47 PM, Resident #68 stated, I don't drink the water here. I drink coffee with each meal and I eat Ice chips. They don't always bring me my ice chips. They are getting a little better since I had that intravenous (IV) to get fluids. Further record review of Resident #68's diagnoses revealed that Resident #68 was diagnosed with a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) on 09/06/24 that was resolved on 10/05/24. The Hydration risk evaluation dated 10/09/24 did not indicate that Resident #68 had a history of UTI, which would put her at a higher risk for dehydration. Further record review of Resident #68's diagnosis revealed a diagnosis of depression. The Hydration risk evaluation dated 10/09/24 does not indicate that Resident #68…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. These were random opportunities that had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #132 and #130. Facility census: 145. Findings included: a) On 10/30/24 at 10:02 AM an inspection of the laundry room was made with the Assistant Executive Director accompanying the survey. In the dirty area of the laundry room, where dirty laundry was brought and sorted, five (5) mop heads were noted to hanging on hooks. Laundry room worker #176 stated the mop heads were clean. She stated they could not go into the dryer so they had been hung there to dry after washing. She stated she realized clean items should not be drying in the dirty laundry area, but that she did not have anywhere else to hang them. b) Resident #132 On 10/30/24 at 8:55 AM, an observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #153 was made during medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to make sure call light was accessible to Resident #120. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the Long-Term Care survey. Facility census: 145. Resident identifier: #120 Findings included: a) Resident #120 During the initial facility tour on 10/28/24 around 11:45 AM the surveyor observed Resident #120 lying in bed with head elevated, the call light was not within reach of Resident #120. The call light was hanging between the headboard and the mattress. As the surveyor exited the room, the staff entered the room. Further observation on 10/28/24 around 12:15 PM of Resident #120 laying in the bed after staff left the room revealed the call light was still hanging on the headboard not within reach to Resident #20. An interview with Unit Manager Registered Nurse (UMRN)# 50 on 10/28/24 at approximately 12:20 PM confirmed the call light was not within reach for Resident #120. On 10/29/24 at approximately 9:00 AM the Administrator provided a copy of the facility policy. On page two (2) procedure one (1) Section C…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to honor Resident #68's choices in their preference to only have female caregivers. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (9) nine residents reviewed for choices during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #68. Facility Census: 145. Findings include: a) Resident #68 During an interview on 10/29/24 at 1:00 PM, Resident #68 stated, I don't like it when the guys come in to take care of me, I won't let them. Record review on 10/29/24 at 2:15 PM, for Resident #68 revealed a care plan that reads as follows: Residents prefers female caregivers. A record review on 10/29/24 at 4:30 PM of the Daily Assignment sheets for EB2 indicated that Resident #68 had a male Nursing Assistant (NA) assigned to her on 10/08/24, 10/09/24, 10/15/24, and 10/23/24. During an interview on 10/29/24 at 4:40 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, She usually doesn't like male caregivers, but she will tolerate (NA #44 named). We do the assignments by seniority. So he typically gets the assignment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of a reported incident and identify an allegation of neglect. The facility did not follow physician's orders for Resident #122. This was true for 1(one) of 4 (four) residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Resident identifier #122. Facility Census 145. Findings included: a) A review of the incident report, investigation and five day-follow-up that occurred on 06/16/24 for Resident #122 revealed the following: Resident # 122 was found in her room with chopped up fruit in her bed by a nurse aide. The resident's brother later reported to the nurse that he had Resident #122 laughing and spitting up chunks of fruit. There was a spoon and empty fruit cup on the floor beside her bed on 06/16/24. There were (3) three witness statements collected. Witness statements were collected from the nurse aide and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #52 and the assistant cook. The Assistant [NAME] reported that a nurse called and asked for scrambled eggs for Resident #122 on 06/17/24 and she made them…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to make a care plan revision in the area of advanced directives. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (6) six residents reviewed for Advance Directives during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #66. Facility census: 145. Findings Include: a) Resident #66 A record review on [DATE] at 8:52 AM, revealed that Resident #66's was marked as a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) on her post form dated [DATE]. Further record review of Resident #66's care plan reads as follows: Focus: Resident has a Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) code status. Revised on [DATE] During an interview on [DATE] at 11:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the code status for Resident #66 did not match.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure they provided emergency care in accordance with the resident's advanced directives. Resident #139 had a [NAME] Virginia Post Orders to Health Care (POST) form that specified the resident did not want cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The resident's care plan had not been updated to reflect this and indicated the resident was a full code. The resident received CPR when they had no pulse and were not breathing. Resident identifier: #139. Facility census: 145. Findings included: a) Resident #139 During a medical record rive for resident #139 on [DATE] at approximately 09:45 AM it is identified that the resident had capacity and had completed the [NAME] Virginia Post Orders to Health Care (POST) form on [DATE] which identifies the following: Section A) Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Orders. Follow these orders if patient has no pulse and is not breathing. NO CPR: Do not attempt Resuscitation (May choose any option in Section B.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the environment as free of accident hazards as possible. A used razor laying on Resident #53's bathroom sink. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #53. Facility Census: 145. Findings Include: a) Resident #53 On 10/28/24 at 11:18 AM, a used razor was observed laying on the bathroom sink in Resident #53's room. On 10/28/24 at 11:20 AM, the Facility Scheduler #19 confirmed the used razor was laying on the bathroom sink. The Facility Scheduler stated, I'll take care of it. On 10/29/24 at 8:58 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified and confirmed the used razor should not have been left on the bathroom sink.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and family interview the facility failed to recognize, evaluate, and address the needs of each resident at risk for and experiencing dehydration. This failed practice was found true for (1) of (3) residents reviewed for dehydration during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier #68. Facility Census 145. Findings Include: a) Resident identifier #68 During the initial interview on 10/28/24 at 12:47 PM, Resident #68 stated, I don't drink the water here. I drink coffee with each meal and I eat Ice chips. They don't always bring me my ice chips. They are getting a little better since I had that intravenous (IV) to get fluids. Further record review of Resident #68's diagnoses revealed that Resident #68 was diagnosed with a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) on 09/06/24 that was resolved on 10/05/24. The Hydration risk evaluation dated 10/09/24 did not indicate that Resident #68 had a history of UTI, which would put her at a higher risk for dehydration. Further record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to promptly obtain needed dental services for damaged dentures for Resident #31. The was true for 1 (one) of 3 (three) reviewed for dental needs. Resident identifier #31. Facility census: 145. Finding included: a) Resident #31 An interview on 10/28/24 at 12:10 PM with resident #31 who reported that he had 2 (two) missing teeth from his upper, front dentures due to eating facility's tough meat. Resident's dentures were observed to have missing 2 (two) front teeth. He stated that the facility was aware that his dentures were broken for over a year and had not yet offered to make an appointment to have them repaired. He reported that he was not having difficulty eating but that he did not like the way they looked. b) On 10/29/24 an interview with Medical Records Coordinator #150 reported that nurses would give her a consult assessment when a resident was in need of a dental appointment, and she would follow up with business office for insurance options, schedule appointment and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to meet resident's nutritional needs by serving Resident #31 food he was allergic to. This is true for three (3) of 13 residents review for food preferences. Resident identifier: #31, #68, and #10. Facility census: 145. Findings included: a) Resident #31 On 10/28/24 at 12:10 PM an interview with Resident #31 who reported that he was allergic to lemon and the facility continues to serve him lemon products. He reported that some of his dietary cards reflect that he was allergic to lemon and other cards stated that he was allergic to only lemonade. Resident reported that when he consumes lemon products he would break out in hives. b) On 10/28/24 a review of resident's records revealed the following: Resident #31's care plan and medical records reveal that he was allergic to lemon. Resident # 31's dietary cards revealed the that the resident's card stated following and that he was served food containing lemon on these days: 08/19/23- Allergies: Lemon, Lemon Bar 09/13/23- Allergies: Lemonade, Lemon Bar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's diet was followed per physician's orders for Resident #122. This is true for 1(one) of 13 residents reviewed for food. Resident identifier #122. Facility Census 145. Findings included: a) A review of incident report, investigation and five day-follow-up that occurred on 06/16/24 for resident #122 revealed the following: Resident # 122 was found in her room with chopped up fruit in her bed by Nurses Aide. The resident's brother later reported to the nurse that he had resident #122 laughing and spitting up chunks of fruit. There was a spoon and empty fruit cup in the floor beside her bed on 06/16/24. There were (3) three witness statements collected. That of the Nursed Aide and Licensed Practical Nurse #52 who found fruit and spoon but did not know how resident obtained it. The Assistant [NAME] was the last witness statement obtained and it was reported that a nurse called and asked for scrambled eggs for resident #122 on 06/17/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observatio and staff interview the facility failed to ensure they, prepared and served food under sanitary conditions. This has the potential to affect all residents of the facility who received an oral diet. Facility census:145. Findings included: a) During an observation of the lunch meal service in dining Room EB1 10/28/24, Resident # 90 had an egg sandwich. She took a bite and bit down onto a piece of foil which was inside the sandwich. During an interview with Dietary Director #20, he acknowledged the piece of foil and stated he would find out how it happened to be in her sandwich. During an observation of dining room EB2 lunch service on 10/29/24, there were three (3) beverage serving containers on a cart. These were being used to serve drinks to residents during the lunch service. These three containers were not labeled or dated for expiration. The outside of the containers did not appear to be clean. During an interview with Dietary Director #20, he identified the beverages as tea, fruit juice and punch. He acknowledged the containers should be labeled and dated.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate record regarding Resident #34's assistance for meals and Resident #75's diagnosis of anxiety. This was true for two (2) of 41 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident identifiers: #34 and #75. Facility Census: 145. Findings Include: a) Resident #34 On [DATE] at 12:02 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #34. The review found the resident was ordered nothing by mouth (NPO) and received a tube feeding for nutrition which was Jevity 1.5 83ml (milliliters)/hr (hour) for 17 hours. The resident was noted to be dependent for all meal and fluid intake. The review, also, found documentation on the September, 2024 and October, 2024 medication administration record (MAR) indicating the resident was independent, set up only, one (1) person physical assistance and two (2) + ( plus) persons physical assist. The September, 2024 MAR indicated 28 times, the resident ranged from independent to 2+ persons…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed by the physician for the basis for the discharge for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for a discharge to home. Resident identifier: #151. Facility Census: 148 Findings include: a) Resident #151 A medical record review was completed on 05/08/24 at 10:30 AM. The record review revealed Resident #151 was discharged to home on [DATE]. A discharge note (nurse note) dated 04/25/24 at 10:51 AM read as follows: piatient being discharged home today, this nurse did complete body audit on patient and no new skin issues noted, went over discharge instructions with patient and doughtier both verbalized understanding, order received to give patient 36 Norco 5-325, medications called in to mountaineer drug per patient request, patient leaving facility via wheelchair with family. The record did not reflect a physician discharge note was completed for the date of discharge. During an interview on 05/07/24 at 3:38…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigations of Resident #75 allegations of abuse. The facility failed to maintain documentation that alleged violations were thoroughly investigated. This was true for one (1) of three (3) resdients reviewed for abuse. Resident Identifiers: Resident #75 Facility Census: 148. Findings include: a) Resident #75 A review of the facility reportable records log on 05/07/24 at 9:56 AM, revealed an alleged incident occurring on 03/06/24 involving Resient #75 was unsubstantiated. The reporting form dated 03/06/24 read as follows: Alleged Victim: ( Name of Resident #75) Alleged Perpetrator: (Name of Nurse Aide (NA) #57) Allegation: Date of Incident: unknown Time of incident: unknown Date this report completed: 03/16/24 Describe incident/injuries: An allegation of abuse was reported this date. A record review on 05/07/24 at 1:45 PM, found Resident #75 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 on the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for ARD (assessment reference date) of 03/11/24. BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-24 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Daily Staffing Posting information was accurate and current and the facility failed to maintain the Daily Staffing Posting data for a minimum of 18 months. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect all resident currently residing at the facility. Facility Census 141 Findings included: a) Accurate and current data On 1/23/24 (01/23/24) at 10:00 AM, during a review of the facilities Daily Staffing Posting and the Daily Punches data for all direct care staff, the following discrepancies were identified with the total number of direct care hours being reported on the Daily Staffing Posting for 11/03/23, 11/16/23 and 1/19/24. -- 11/03/23 Daily Punches data for all direct care staff was 413.25 hours and the Daily Staffing Posting reported a total of direct care hours being 443.25, an inaccuracy of 30 hours. -- The 11/16/23 Daily Punches data for all direct care staff was 430.25 hours and the Daily Staffing Posting reported a total of direct care hours being 507.75 hours, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Facility census: 141 Findings included: a) During a tour of the facility on 1/23/24 at 1:24 PM the egress directly in front of the emergency exit door on unit EB2 off from the dining room and activity area was fully blocked by large dietary carts and a large trash can. During an interview with the Activities Director (AD) #19 on 1/23/24 at 1:27 PM, AD#19 acknowledged the emergency door exit was completely blocked and acknowledged this was not safe in the event of an emergency for evacuation. AD #19 immediately began moving the items away from the blocked emergency exit.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety related to, sanitary conditions and the prevention of foodborne illness. This has the potential to affect all residents that get their nutrition from the kitchen. Facility census: 141. Findings include: a) Kitchen Tour of the kitchen on 1/23/24 at 10:00 AM with the Dietary Manager found the steam table and lids and plate warmer was heavily soiled, with grease build up, and old food debris. Continued tour revealed 2 maintenance workers, working in the kitchen on the plate warmer without hair coverings. During an interview on 1/23/24 at 10:00 AM the Dietary Manager, confirmed the steam table with lids and plate warmer was heavily soiled, with grease build up, and old food debris. She also verified the Maintenance workers were working on the plate warmer in the food preparation area without hair coverings.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This failed practices was a random opportunity for discovery while observing medication pass. Resident identifiers: #120. Facility census 141. Findings include: a) Resident #120 On 01/23/23 at 8:40 AM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #108 was pulling medication for Resident #120 and dropped a pill on the med-cart. There was not a barrier on the cart and LPN #108 picked up the pill without donning a glove and put the pill in the cup with the other medications. LPN #108 gave all of the pills in the cup to Resident #120. This is the list of medications given: Fexofenadine 180 mg Metoprolol 50 mg Myrbetrig 25 mg Valsartan 160 mg When asked, LPN #108 agreed she should have not picked the pill up with a bare hand.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on facility record review and staff interview the facility failed to offer the Pneumococcal vaccine when eligible. This was true for four (4) out of five (5) reviewed for immunizations. Resident identifiers: #143, #19, #100, and #120. Facility census: 141. Findings include: a) Pneumococcal vaccine Resident #143 was admitted on [DATE] and a review of the medical records found this resident received Pneumonia vaccine 23 on 10/12/12. Resident #19 was admitted on [DATE] and a review of the medical records revealed Resident #19 received the following Pneumococcal vaccines. The PREVNAR (PVC) 13 was given on 09/2016, Pneumococcal (PNX) on 12/2009, Pneumococcal Polysaccharide (PPSV 23) on 05/2015. Resident #100 was admitted on [DATE] and had nothing listed for pneumococcal vaccines. Resident #120 was admitted on [DATE] and did not have anything listed as past vaccinations. On 01/23/24 at 11:15 AM, the IP was asked about the four (4) residents mentioned above and their pneumococcal vaccines. It was pointed out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the residents residing in room [ROOM NUMBER] was treated with respect and dignity when a housekeeper failed to obtain the residents permission before entering the room and talked on her cell phone the entire time, she was in the resident's room. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: room [ROOM NUMBER]. Facility Census: #141 a) room [ROOM NUMBER] On 01/23/24 at 9:42 AM Housekeeper #170 was observed going into room [ROOM NUMBER] while talking on her teal-colored phone. This housekeeper opened the door and walked into the room without knocking. Housekeeper #170 was observed talking on her phone while in the room and remained on her phone when she exited the room. Housekeeper #170 was stopped upon exiting the room and was asked about knocking on doors before opening and walking in the room. Housekeeper #170 said, It does not matter if you knock or not most of these people here either can't hear or can't talk so it does…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan to indicate skin issues were healed for Resident #73, #40 and #31. This is true for three (3) of five (5) residents reviewed under the care area of pressure ulcers. Resident identifiers: #73, #40 and #31. Facility Census: 141. Findings included: a) Resident #73 On 01/22/24 at 11:00 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #73. A review of the care plan indicated the resident had excoriation to the bilateral buttock. The weekly skin assessments were reviewed indicating the resident currently had no skin issues. On 01/22/24 at 3:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed and was asked, does the resident have any skin issues? The DON stated, the care plan is incorrect .the resident does not have any skin issues. b) Resident #40 On 01/22/24 at 11:25 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #40. A review of the care plan indicated the resident had open MASD (moisture-associated skin damage). The weekly skin assessments were reviewed indicating the resident had no skin issues…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility record review and staff interview the facility failed to administer medication as prescribed by the physician, failing to offer the Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine when available, failed to complete neuro checks, failed to notify physician of no bowel movement, failed to notify physician of resident requesting to go to the emergency room, no protocol for bowel regiment, failed to follow physicians' orders. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifiers: #16, #14, #59, #75, #126, #147, #60, 18, and #145. Facility census 142. Findings included: a) Resident #147 Record review on 01/22/24 at 10:00 AM found that on 12/27/23 at 09:30 PM, according to a nurse progress note, Resident #147 had an elevated blood glucose level of 660. The nurse administered the ordered dose of insulin (18 units). There was no nurse note completed at that time of the Physician being notified. However, there is a progress note on 12/27/23 at 9:33 PM from Telehealth Physician which states:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to have a care plan addressing the provision of meals before, during and/or after dialysis treatments. This was true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for dialysis treatment during a complaint survey. Resident identifier:#68. Facility census: 141. Findings included: a) Resident #68. Medical record review of Resident #68's medical record found a physician's order for: Dialysis every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday with chair time at 6:40 am. Continued review of the residents (resident's) dialysis care plan found there was no provision of meals before, during and/or after dialysis treatments. During an Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/24/24 at 10:23 AM, she verified there was no dialysis meal plan for dialysis days in Resident #68's care plan.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate and complete. This is true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed under the care area of discharges. Resident Identifiers: #66 and #31. Facility Census: 141. Findings Include: a) Resident #66 On 01/23/24 at 11:00 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #66. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility on 01/23/24 at 9:20 AM. However, the transfer form indicates the resident was transferred on 12/19/23 at 9:27 AM. On 01/23/24 at 2:20 PM, the Director of Nursing was interviewed and was asked when the resident got transferred to the acute care facility. DON stated the transfer date on the form was incorrect. The DON stated, I have never noticed that before .the documentation is showing the last time the resident was sent out to the acute care facility. b) Resident #31 1) On 01/23/24 at 11:45 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #31. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility on 12/07/23 at 10:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for Resident #8. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #8. Facility Census:143. Findings Included: a) Resident #8 On 11/06/23 at 12:24 PM, multiple residents were being observed during the noon meal. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #155 was observed standing while feeding Resident #8. On 11/06/23 at 12:35 PM, the Assistant Executive Director #76 was notified and confirmed no one should be standing while feeding a resident. No further information was obtained during the survey process. .

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve a grievance and to keep the resident notified of progress toward a resolution. This was true for two (2) of four (4) grievances reviewed during the complaint survey. Resident identifiers: #1. Facility census: 143. Findings Included: a) Policy Review Record review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Grievance, showed: -The Grievance Official shall complete an investigation of the Resident Grievance. -The grievance review will be completed in a reasonable time frame consistent with the type of grievance. -The Grievance Official will meet with the resident and inform the resident of the result of the investigation and how the resident's grievance was resolved or will be resolved, if applicable. b) Hearing Aids During an interview on 11/06/23 at 12:55 pm, Resident #1 verified her Hearing Aids were missing. On 11/05/23 at 3:00 PM during an interview with Resident #1's Medical Power of Attorney stated that the facility lost her Hearing Aids in February 2023, and they have never…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to remove the use of hearing aids for Resident #1 in the Minimum Data Set (MDS). This is true for one (1) of eight (8) residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident identifier: #1. Facility Census: 143. Findings included: a) Resident #1 On 11/07/23 at 12:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #1. The review found the MDS with the assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/16/23 was incorrect regarding hearing, speech, and vision in Section B. Section B stated the resident had moderate difficulty hearing and the use of hearing aids. However, the resident's hearing aids had not been used since February 2023 because they were lost at the facility. On 11/07/23 at 1:20 PM, the MDS Registered Nurse (RN) #126 confirmed the MDS with an ARD of 10/16/23 was incorrect. The MDS RN #126 stated, I thought the hearing aids had been replaced .she went out for an appointment. No further information was obtained during the survey process.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Resident had a person-centered comprehensive care plan developed and implemented to meet his / her preferences and goals and address the resident's physical needs. This practice had the potential to effect more than a limited number of Residents. Resident identifier: #1. Facility census 143. Findings Included: a) Resident #1 An observation during a complaint investigation about missing dentures on 11/06/23 revealed Resident #1 had top dentures in place. Medical record review on 11/07/23, showed a Long-Term Care Evaluation dated 10/01/22 Nutrition section: --Upper and Lower Dentures Further review of Resident #1's medical record revealed the care plan (an overview of resident care for nursing staff) did not contain an intervention for Dentures. During an interview, on 11/07/23 at 1:21 PM, the Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDS-N) #126, confirmed the facility failed to develop a care plan related to dental or denture care for Resident #1. She verified Resident #1's care plan was incomplete without dental or denture…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan for Resident #1. This is true for one (1) of eight (8) residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident identifier: #1. Facility Census: 143. Findings Included: a) Resident #1 On 11/06/23 at 2:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #1. The review found the care plan listed a focus area of potential for communication problem due to patient having hearing problems. The interventions listed are as follows: --Change batteries to hearing aids as needed. --Ensure patient has hearing aids in (Bilateral) ears. However, the resident's hearing aids had been missing since February 2023. On 11/07/23 at 1:20 PM, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Registered Nurse (RN) #126 confirmed the care plan had not been revised since the loss of the resident's hearing aids. The MDS RN #126 stated, I thought the hearing aides had been replaced .she went out for an appointment. No further information was obtained during the survey process.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper treatment related to a hearing impairment for one (1) of two (2) resident in the care area of communication / sensory. Resident identifier: #1. Facility census: 143. Findings include: a) Resident #1 During an interview on 11/06/23 at 12:55 Pm, Resident #1 verified her Hearing Aids were missing. On 11/05/23 at 3:00 PM during an interview with Resident #1s Medical Power of Attorney stated, the facility lost her Hearing Aids in February 2023, and never replaced them. She stated she had reported the hearing aids missing multiple times to the Social Worker and Business office Manager. A record review of grievances found a grievance form filled out on 02/23/23 reporting Resident #1's missing hearing aids. The recommendation on the form revealed, Patient has insurance to cover replacement if not found, Center will facilitate as needed. The resolution was marked resolved, Facility will replace them. Continued review revealed an invoice sent from (A local Hearing Aide Provider)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to assist with replacing a Resident's missing Lower dentures in a timely manner. This is true for one (1) of two (2) reviewed for missing dentures. Resident identifier: #1. Facility census 143. Findings included: a) Resident #1 An observation during a complaint investigation about missing dentures on 11/06/23 found Resident #1 had top dentures in place with no lower dentures. Resident #1 verified her lower dentures were missing. On 11/05/23 at 3:00 PM, during an interview Resident #1's Medical Power of Attorney stated, the facility lost her lower dentures about a year ago, and they had never replaced them. She stated she had reported the dentures missing multiple times to the Social Worker and Business office Manager. Medical record review on 11/07/23, showed a Long-Term Care Evaluation dated 10/01/22 Nutrition section confirmed, Resident #1 had Upper and Lower Dentures. During an interview on 11/06/23, at 3:38 PM the Business Office Manager stated, she was aware Resident #1 was missing her bottom dentures for about a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-07 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on facility documentation and staff interview the facility failed to have a certified Infection Preventionist (IP) that worked at least part time in the facility. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. Facility Census: 141. Findings included: a) Infection Preventionist Record review of the facility's documentation of Infection control practices found the facility was unable to provide an Infection Control Preventionist Certification or documentation for an IP that worked at least part time in the facility. During an Interview 09/06/23 at 1:38 PM Director of Nursing (DON) Stated that she and the assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) document all infections for residents in the facility, neither are IP certified. She continued to say that the facility has not had an IP since May 2023, she stated that the corporate consultant is available if they need her, she works at the corporate office. No other information was provided prior to the end of the survey on 09/07/23.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain compliance with an effective pest control program that would ensure that the facility is free of pests and rodents for one (1) out of three (3) medication supply rooms. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents within the facility. Facility census: 141. Findings included: a) Medication Supply Room Observation An observation was conducted on 09/06/23 at 8:46 a.m. on Complex Transitional Care Unit #1 (CTC1) of the medication supply room. Staff #118 was present during the observation. The medication supply room was dirty, and trash was overflowing in the garbage can. The counter tops were dirty with dust and stains on them. The floor had spills and stains on it. There was a dead spider on the floor and spider droppings, cobwebs, and spider eggs behind the door. When asked how often the room was cleaned Staff #118 stated at least once a week or more if needed. There were three (3) large boxes of outdated medications sitting in the room with an open lid. When ask how often…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to making prompt efforts to resolve a grievance and to keep the resident notified of progress toward resolution. This is true for one (2) of three (3) reviewed during a complaint Survey. Resident identifier: #70. Facility census: 141. Findings included: a) Resident #70 During an interview with Resident #70 on 09/05/23 at 2:20 PM she revealed she did not get his showers as they were scheduled. She stated that most of the time her family must call and complain before she receives showers. She stated her son had to call today because she had not received her shower today. At 2:29 PM during this interview two (2) Nurse Aids entered the room and told Resident #70 they were there to take her to the shower. Medical record review revealed, Resident #70's shower schedule and preference was two (2) times weekly. A continued record review of Resident #70's Quarterly 06/09/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS), found the resident's brief interview for mental status was fifteen (15) the highest score obtainable. MDS section G (Functional Status)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and operation policy the facility failed to report alleged violation related to, neglect and report the results of all investigation to the proper authorities within a prescribed time frame. This is true for one (1) of three (3) allegations of abuse. Resident identifier: #70. Facility census: 141 Findings included: a) Resident #70 Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation of Resident Property, showed: Neglect: Neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees, or services providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional destress . -Investigation of an incident: -An event may not be perceived by staff to constitute resident abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of resident property; however. If a resident, family member or visitor perceives an event to be abuse, neglect, or misappropriation, the facility must report the event. -The Executive Director / Designee will report appropriate incidents to Adult…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on, Resident Interview, staff interview, and operation policy the facility failed to investigate an alleged violation related to, neglect, report the results of all investigation to the proper authorities within a prescribed time frames. This is true for one (1) of three (3) allegations of abuse. Resident identifier: #70. Facility census: 141. Findings Included: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation of Resident Property, showed: Neglect: Neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees, or services providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional destress. -Investigation of an incident: -An event may not be perceived by staff to constitute resident abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of resident property; however. If a resident, family member or visitor perceives an event to be abuse, neglect, or misappropriation, the facility must report the event. -The Executive Director / Designee will report appropriate incidents to Adult…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to assist dependent Residents with activities of daily living (ADL's) in accordance with the Residents assessed needs for care. This was true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for ADL care. Resident identifiers: #70 and #124. Facility census: 141. Findings Included: a) Resident #70 During an interview with Resident #70 on 09/05/23 at 2:20 PM she revealed that she does not get his showers per scheduled. She stated that most of the time her family must call and complain before she receives showers. She stated that her son had to call today, because she had not received her shower today. At 2:29 PM during this interview two (2) Nurse Aids entered the room and told Resident #70 they were there to take her to the shower. Medical record review revealed, Resident #70's shower schedule and preference is two (2) times weekly. A continued record review of Resident #70's Quarterly 06/09/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS), found the resident's brief interview for mental status was fifteen (15) the highest…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with physician's orders for one (1) of seven (7) residents reviewed. Resident #85 experienced a delay in diagnostic testing and the facility failed to ensure the physician had knowledge of the delay in services. Resident identifier: #85. Census: 141. Findings included: a) Resident #85 An interview, with Resident #85, on 09/05/23 at 11:45 AM, revealed the resident had fallen in the facility in July 2023 and sustained an ankle fracture. Resident #85, was noted to have a brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS of 15, identified on the 02/03/23 comprehensive assessment). A BIMS of 15 noted the resident was cognitively intact. Further interview, with Resident #85, revealed there was a long period of time from when the fall occurred until the ankle was X-rayed. A record review showed, Resident #85 had a witnessed fall on 07/03/23 at 22:00 hours (10:00 PM). At this time the physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record. Specifically, shower documentation. This practice affected one (1) of three (3). Resident identifier #70. Facility census: # 141. Findings included: a) Resident #70 During an Interview with Resident #70 on 09/05/23 at 2:20 PM she revealed that she did not get showers as scheduled. She stated most of the time her family must call and complain before she received a shower. She stated her son had to call today, because she had not received her shower. At 2:29 PM during the interview two (2) Nurse Aides entered the room and told Resident #70 they were there to take her to the shower. Medical record review revealed, Resident #70's shower schedule and preference was two (2) times weekly. A continued record review of Resident #70's Quarterly 06/09/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS), found the resident's brief interview for mental status was fifteen (15) the highest score obtainable. MDS section G (Functional Status) indicates Total Dependence with bathing. MDS Section E…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on facility documentation and staff interview the facility failed to have a certified Infection Preventionist (IP) attend and participate in the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings that worked at least part time in the facility. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. Facility Census: 141. Findings included: a) QAA Record review of the facility's documentation of QAA Meeting Agenda and Minutes revealed no IP attended the meeting since May 2023. During an Interview 09/06/23 at 1:38 PM Director of Nursing (DON) Stated that she and the assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) document all infections for residents in the facility, neither are IP certified. She continued to say that the facility has not had an IP since May 2023, she stated that the corporate consultant is available if they need her, she works at the corporate office. No other information was provided prior to the end of the survey on 09/07/23.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for the care area of notification of changes was informed in advance of outpatient appointments. Resident identifier: #5. Facility census: 144. Findings included: a) Resident #5 On 11/14/22 at 9:50 AM, the resident said, I never know when my appointments are. One day not too long ago they came in, woke me up from a sleep, and said you are going to the doctor now. I said what Doctor am I going to? I wish they would tell me these things before it's time to go. If they would tell me, I would keep track of the appointments. The resident said this has happened before. Review of the medical record found the physician determined the resident has capacity to make decisions on 04/06/20 and again on 05/04/22. The residents most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 08/17/22 indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 15. Review of the electronic medical record found the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-16 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate information was communicated to the receiving hospital to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitalizations during the long-term care survey process. Resident Identifier: Resident #493. Facility census: 144. Findings included: A facility policy titled Transfer and discharge (including AMA) with a revision date of 05/03/21 found the following. .7. Emergency Transfers/Discharges .d. Completed and send with the patient a Transfer Form which documents: i.Patients status, including baseline current mental behavioral and functional status and recent vital signs ii. Current diagnosis, allergies and reason for transfer/discharge. iii. Contact information of the practioner responsible for the care of the patient iv. Patient representative information including contact information v. Current medication medication (including when last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-16 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence a copy of the Notice of Transfer was sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. This was true for one (1) of three (3) reviewed for the care area of hospitalization during the long-term care process. Resident Identifier: Resident #493. Facility Census: 144. Findings Included: A facility policy titled Transfer and Discharge (including AMA) with a revision date 05/03/21 found the following. .7. Emergency Transfers/Discharges .k. Social Services Director, or designee, shall provide notice of transfer to a representative of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman via monthly list. a) Resident #493 During a review of Resident #493's medical record on 11/15/22 at 12:07 PM, revealed she was transferred to a local hospital on the following dates: -07/29/22 -07/07/22 -06/21/22 A further review of the medical record revealed Resident #493 was provided Bed hold policy on the following dates: -07/29/22 -07/07/22 -06/21/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of twenty-nine (29) minimum data sets (MDS) reviewed during the Long-term Care Survey Process (LTCSP) were accurately coded. For Resident #75, the MDS were inaccurate in area of medication. For Resident # 104 the MDS inaccurately coded her siderails as a physical restraint. Resident identifiers: #75 and #104. Facility census: 144. Findings include: a) Resident #75 Review of Resident #75's medical records revealed Resident #75 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #75's 5 day-admission MDS with assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/09/22, found under section N -Medications; the MDS was coded the resident's use of an anticoagulant. Resident #75's physicians orders reviewed found an order for, Plavix-(Clopidogrel) 75 milligrams (mg) daily Review of the Center for Medicare and Medication Services (CMS), Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual CH 3: MDS Items [P] Page N-7. N0410E, Anticoagulant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, observation and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for two (2) of 27 records reviewed during the long term care survey. Resident identifiers: #5 and #19. Facility census: 144. Findings included: a) Resident #5 On 11/14/22 at 8:36 AM, the resident said her hearing aids were broken. She said I am afraid I will have an appointment with the neurologist and I won't be able to understand what he is saying. It is very important that I hear him because I need to know what's happening to me. The surveyor had to adjust the voice tone and stand at the resident's left side for the resident to hear. The resident said one hearing aid is broken and the other one isn't working. They told me those need cleaned but I can't clean them myself. The resident said she was unsure of the exact time frame when each hearing aid quit working. She said it was less than a month. One broke probably 3 weeks ago. Then the other one quit, working about a week ago. Review of the medical record found the physician determined the resident has capacity to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for the application of hipsters for a resident with a history of multiple falls. This was true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed under the care area of falls. Resident Identifier: #33. Facility Census: 144. Findings Included: a) Resident #33 On 11/15/22 at 11:30 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #33. A physician's order dated 08/02/22 stated the following: hipsters at all times may remove for bathing, hygiene, and skin checks every day and every night shift. The care plan also listed hipsters at all times as an intervention under the focus area of actual falls with potential injuries . On 11/15/22 at 1:35 PM, the resident was found with no hipsters in place. Nurse Aid (NA) #88 verified the resident was not wearing the hipsters per the physician's order. On 11/15/22 at 2:17 PM, the Administrator was notified and confirmed the resident should be wearing hipsters per the physician's order and care plan intervention. No further information was obtained during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-16 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for the care area of communication/sensory during the long-term care survey had hearing aids in good repair. Resident identifier: 5. Facility census: 144. Findings included: a) Resident #5 On 11/14/22 at 8:36 AM, the resident said her hearing aids were broken. She said, I am afraid I will have an appointment with the neurologist and I won't be able to understand what he is saying. It is very important that I hear him because I need to know what's happening to me. The surveyor had to adjust the voice tone and stand at the resident's left side for the resident to hear. The resident said one hearing aid is broken and the other one isn't working. They told me those need cleaned but I can't clean them myself. The resident said she was unsure of the exact time frame when each hearing aid quit working. She said it was less than a month. One broke probably 3 weeks ago. Then the other one quit working about a week ago. Review of the medical record found the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-16 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on resident interview, observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide foot care to a diabetic resident consistent with professional standards of practice. Arrangements were not made for routine podiatry services to prevent foot complications and maintain comfort in a resident with diabetes. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: 10. Facility census: 144. Findings include: a) Resident (R) #10 During an interview on 11/14/22 at 8:58 AM, R#10 reported foot discomfort and stated she needed her toe nails trimmed. An observation during this interview found her toe nails to be long with overlapping toes. Review of the medical record on 11/15/22 revealed R#10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including diabetes. The physician orders include an order for a podiatrist consult written 03/22/22. The care plan states see podiatrist as needed for diabetic foot care. The record lacks any information regarding podiatry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    b) Resident #47 On 11/14/2022 at 10:57 AM, the resident said she is supposed to have palm guards for her hands, and staff are not putting them on. Observation found no palm guards were in place. Resident #47 states that she believes they must have thrown it away as she said she has not seen it in a long time. On 11/14/2022 at 1:55 PM, staff observed that resident #47 did not have palm guards in place as directed by the care plan which says, CNA (certified nursing assistant) to apply left palm guard in the AM after skin care. CNA to remove in the PM, dated 06/20/2022. On 06/22/22, the physician wrote an order for: CNA to apply left palm guard in the AM after skin care. CNA to remove in the PM, order dated 06/22/2022. On 11/14/2022 at 2:00 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #14 stated that applying the palm guard was a task assigned to the nursing assistants and she was unsure if they are currently applying the palm guard to resident. On 11/15/2022 at 9:00 AM, Resident #47 was again observed by staff without palm guard. On 11/15/2022 at 9:10 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide hemodialysis services consistent with professional standards of practice. This was discovered for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for dialysis services during the Long Term Care Service Process. Resident identifier: #96. Facility census: 144. Findings included: a) Resident #96 During a medical record review for Resident #96 on 11/15/22 a physician's order indicated hemostats were to be readily available for Resident #96's perma catheter. On 11/16/22 at 8:42 AM, the Unit Charge Nurse #145 was unable to locate any hemostats in Resident #96's room. The UCN #145 reported the hemostats were not readily accessible at bedside for the perma catheter for Resident #96. .

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the physician provided a rationale for disagreeing to discontinue an unnecessary medication, recommended by the facility pharmacist. This was true for one (1) out of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifiers: # 114. Facility census 144. Findings included: a) Resident #114 Medical record review found on 10/21/22, the facility pharmacist recommended the medication, Methenamine Hippurate 1 gram to be discontinued. Methenamine Hippurate is used to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI). The facility attending physician did not provide a rationale for disagreeing with the pharmacist. The physician marked the disagree box, signed, and dated the recommendation. During an interview on 11/15/22 at 2:00 PM, the Administrator agreed there was no rationale provided for not accepting the Gradual Drug Reduction (GDR) recommended by the pharmacist. On 11/15/22 at 2:12 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the physician provided no rationale for disagreeing with the pharmacist. .

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a safe and sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards of practice. During the kitchen tour it was discovered food had not been dated after opening and the ice machine needed to be cleaned. These practices had the potential to affect a limited number of residents receiving nourishment from the kitchen. Facility census: 144. Findings included: a) Kitchen tour During the kitchen tour on 11/14/22 at 10:56 AM, it was discovered a package of parmesan cheese was not dated after opening and the ice machine was dirty with corrosion build up around the lid area. On 11/14/22 at 11:05 AM, the Dietary Manager verified the parmesan cheese had not been dated after opening and the ice machine needed to be cleaned. .

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents medical record was complete and accurate for two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed for position and mobility. Resident identifier: #117 and #19. Facility census: 144. Findings included: a) Resident #117 Review of the physician's orders found the following order on the medication administration record (MAR): Seat belt placement checks and repositioning while up in wheelchair Q (every) 2 hours -Start Date: 08/04/22. Review of the MAR for November 2022 with Registered Nurse (RN) unit manager #101 on 11/15/22 at 10:49 AM, found the MAR was initialed by the residents nurse every 2 hours on the following days: 11/03/22 11/06/22 11/08/22 11/09/22 11/10/22 11/11/22 11/12/22 11/13/22 RN #101 confirmed initialing the MAR every 2 hours for 24 hours would indicate the resident was up in his wheelchair all day for 24 hours a day on the above dates, which RN #101 said was not true. RN #101 said the order needed to be rewritten because it is confusing. b) Resident #19 Observation of the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    b) Facility: Administration of medication A facility policy titled Medication Administration with a date of 06/21/17 found the following. .Never touch any of the medication with fingers. An observation on EB-1 Hall on 11/15/22 at 9:45 AM, found Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #64 dropped a pill on the floor. LPN #64 stated, does this apply to the five (5) second rule and laughed. LPN #64 picked up the pill with her bare fingers off the floor, placed it in the medication cup with other medication that was already in the cup. LPN #64 continued to get another medication out of a package, thinking she dropped it on the floor. Several staff members and this surveyor looked for the medication on the floor. LPN #64 stated, Oh look it's in my pocket. LPN #64 reached in her pocket, and placed the medication in the medication cup with other pills. LPN #64 acknowledged one pill was in the floor and the other pill was in her pocket, and continued to place other medication in the cup. Registered Nurse (RN) #145 acknowledged LPN #64 putting the pill from her pocket in the medication cup with all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$12,831 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $12,831 — penalty dated 2024-10-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GROVES, DONNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2022
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2023
STOLTZ, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2022
WILHEIM, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2022
CHESTERFIELD MGT CO, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
FERRANTE, TEIRANEEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/14/2021
JARRELL, GREGORYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/20/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$25.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.9M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 10%Other / private 14%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$426per resident / day
operating cost
$12,959per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$469per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515089. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next