Harrison Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 74.8 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident during an assisted transfer, which resulted in the resident falling backwards and developing a subdural hematoma and laceration to the back of her head for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for falls. (Resident E) Findings include: The record for Resident E was reviewed on 9/19/23 at 12:15 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cervical disc disorder with myelopathy of the cervicothoracic region, cognitive communication deficit, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, and obesity. The care plan, dated 11/4/22 and last revised on 8/23/23, indicated the resident was at risk for falls, gait and balance problems, medications, weakness with an actual fall on 8/23/23. The interventions, dated 8/23/23, included, but were not limited to, apply anti-tippers to the wheelchair and send the resident to the ER (emergency room) as needed per MD (medical doctor) order. The nurse's note, dated 8/23/23 at 1:29 p.m., indicated the resident was getting ready to be put back into her bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a history of Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) was provided proper management of the urinary catheter drainage system by maintaining the drainage system off the floor for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. (Residents 71 and 86)Findings include:1. During an observation, on 1/22/26 at 9:30 a.m., Resident 71's urinary catheter bag was resting on the floor next to the resident's left side of the recliner. During an observation and interview, on 1/22/26 at 12:17 p.m. Resident 71's urinary catheter bag was on the floor next to the resident's right side of the recliner. The Director of Nursing (DON) was present in the room and indicated the resident moved the catheter bag on his own. The record for Resident 71 was reviewed on 1/26/26 at 8:15 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, retention of the urine, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (enlargement of the prostate gland), with lower urinary tract symptoms, obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage of the urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a staff member followed the policy and procedure when administering narcotics for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. (Resident B). Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 1/28/26 at 11:00 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, rheumatoid arthritis with rheumatoid factor (an autoantibody found in patients with rheumatoid arthritis often signaling a more sever, aggressive, and erosive form of the disease), spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal canal causing increased pressure on the spinal cord and nerves), and primary osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease characterized by the progressive breakdown of articular cartilage).A facility document, titled Individual Resident's Controlled Substance Administration Record, dated 10/10/25, indicated the form was for Resident E (a family member) of Resident B. The Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Oral Solution 100 milligrams (mg)/5 milliliter (ml) was signed out on the narcotic sheet on the following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow medication administration parameters for a resident's (Resident M) blood pressure for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include:The clinical record for Resident M was reviewed on 8/6/25 at 12:02 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hypertension.The physician's order, dated 6/17/25, indicated the resident was to receive metoprolol (medication for high blood pressure) 25 mg (milligrams) two times a day in the morning and in the evening. The medication was to be held if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 120.Review of the June 2025 and July 2025 medication administration record indicated the medication was administered on the following dates and times:-On 6/24/25 in the evening, the metoprolol was administered when the resident's SBP was 94-On 6/25/25 in the evening, the metoprolol was administered when the resident's SBP was 115-On 7/01/25 in the evening, the metoprolol was administered when the resident's SBP was 112-On 7/06/25 in the morning,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident B) was provided catheter care every shift for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Indwelling catheters.Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 8/5/25 at 10:01 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute kidney failure and obstructive and reflux uropathy.The care plan, dated 6/20/25, indicated the resident had an Indwelling catheter and staff were to provide catheter care every shift.Review of the June 2025 Interventions and Tasks lacked documentation of Indwelling catheter care for Resident B from 6/11/25 through 6/13/25 during night shift.During an interview, on 8/6/25 at 2:43 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 6 indicated catheter care should be provided every shift.On 8/6/28 at 1:28 p.m., the Director of Nursing provided a current, undated copy of the document titled Catheter Care. It included, but was not limited to, Policy.It is the policy of this facility to provide resident care that meets the.needs.of the residents.Catheter care is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory assessments were completed for a resident and failed to ensure respiratory equipment was changed weekly for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident D)Findings Include: On 8/5/25 at 11:40 a.m., a nebulizer machine was observed at Resident D's bedside. The handheld mouthpiece was not bagged or dated.The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 8/5/25 at 11:16 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety and cough.The physician's order, dated 6/2/25, indicated the resident was to receive Duoneb Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) mg (milligram)/3 ml (milliliters) via nebulizer twice daily at 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Review of the June, July, and August 2025 medication administration records, the resident had received the breathing treatments twice daily at the ordered times.The clinical record lacked documentation of a respiratory assessment before and after the breathing treatments and weekly replacement of the nebulizer tubing, chamber and mouthpiece.During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's (Resident E) medication administration record accurately reflected the administration of narcotic pain medication for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration.Findings Include:The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 8/5/25 at 1:58 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but was not limited to, right upper arm pain and low back pain.The July 2025 medication administration record indicated the resident was to receive Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) IR (immediate release) 5 mg (milligrams) every 6 hours as needed for pain management.The July 2025 controlled drug record indicated the resident received the medication on the following dates and times:-7/04/25 at 6:00 p.m.-7/05/25 at 12:00 a.m., 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.-7/06/25 at 12:00 a.m., 11:30 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.-7/07/25 at 12:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m.-7/08/25 at 12:00 a.m., 8:15 a.m., 2:15 p.m. and 8:15 p.m.-7/09/25 at 2:15 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.-7/10/25 at 4:00 a.m., 10:00 a.m. and 11:30 p.m.-7/11/25 at 11:30 p.m.-7/12/25 at 5:00…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen concentrator filters were placed and maintained for 5 of 11 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Residents 9, 14, 32, 45, 61) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 12/12/24 at 9:57 a.m., Resident 9's oxygen concentrator filter was 100% heavily covered with a white powdery substance. The oxygen tank's concentrator filter was pushed against the outer wall of the room. During an observation on 12/13/24 at 12:34 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the resident's oxygen concentrator filter was 100% (percent) heavily covered with a white powdery substance. The oxygen tank's concentrator filter was pushed against the outer wall of the room. The record for Resident 9 was reviewed on 12/17/24 at 8:14 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), malignant cancer of the bronchus or lung, and anxiety disorder. The physician's order, dated 1/19/22, indicated staff were to administer oxygen at 2.5 liters via nasal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to respect the dignity of residents related to ensuring the urine side of the indwelling catheter bag was not in sight of those who passed by a resident's room and to ensure a staff member spoke to a resident in a dignified manner for 2 of 20 residents reviewed for Resident Rights. (Residents 283 and 34) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 12/12/24 at 10:00 a.m., Resident 283's indwelling catheter bag was not in a dignity bag and hanging off the right side of the resident's bed. The bag showed clear urine in the bag visible from the hallway. During an observation on 12/12/24 at 12:43 p.m., the resident's indwelling catheter bag was not in a dignity bag and hanging off the right side of the resident's bed. The bag showed clear urine in the bag visible from the hallway.the catheter bag was hanging off the right side of the bed which showed the clear urine side of the bag. There was urine in the bag. During an observation on 12/12/24 2:15 p.m., the resident's indwelling catheter bag was not in a dignity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an appointment was scheduled for the placement of a port for 1 of 1 resident's reviewed for intravenous therapy. (Resident 63) Findings include: The record for Resident 63 was reviewed on 12/17/24 at 9:12 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, immobility syndrome (paraplegic), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuritis, and bed confinement. The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 9/27/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The physician's order, dated 10/30/24, indicated a referral to the surgeon for port (venous) placement for intravenous (IV) access. The resident received IgG (Immunoglobulin) infusions long term care related to poor venous access. The care plan, dated 10/30/24, indicated Resident 63 was currently on intravenous therapy for infusion therapy related to chronic inflammatory demyelination. The interventions included, but were not limited to, administer IV medications and flushes per medical provider's orders. Observe for side effects and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order related to hold parameters for insulin for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for Insulin. (Resident 39) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 39 was reviewed on 12/13/24 at 1:30 p.m A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 12/6/2024, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, and cognitive communication deficit. The resident received insulin for 7 of 7 days during the review period. The current physician's order, with a start date of 8/14/24, indicated the resident was to receive Insulin Aspart Injection Solution 30 units subcutaneously three times a day. The staff were to hold (not administer) the insulin if the resident's blood sugar was less than 150. The October, November, and December 2024 Electronic Administration Record/Electronic Treatment Administration Record (EMAR/ETAR) indicated the Resident received the insulin when their blood sugar was less than 150 on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $182K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN