Hawthorne Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 70.9 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.551 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent a cognitively impaired resident who resided on the secured memory care unit from exiting the facility property without staff knowledge. The resident was found approximately 1.5 miles from the facility. (Resident B) This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on, 4/13/25 at approximately 1:00 a.m., when the facility failed to provide supervision to a cognitively impaired resident, that resided on the memory care unit, to prevent an elopement. The Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Regional Director of Nursing were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 4/22/25 at 12:35 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed, and the deficient practice corrected, 4/14/24, prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Findings include: On 4/22/25 at 8:48 a.m., the Administrator provided a copy of a facility reportable incident, dated 4/13/25 at 4:45 a.m. A review of the reportable incident indicated Resident B walked out of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2024-06-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors when a resident diagnosed with C. diff (Clostridium difficile is a germ that causes inflammation of the colon and can be life threatening.) only received 8 of 39 doses of vancomycin (antibiotic used to treat intestinal infections). (Resident B) Finding included: During an interview, on 6/12/24 at 9:24 a.m. Resident B indicated Resident B had an infection but wasn't sure if he received all of his medications. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/13/24 at 10:15 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of right humerus, diabetes, and atrial fibrillation. An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 6/3/24, indicated Resident B was cognitively intact and frequently incontinent of bowel. A hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated Resident B's primary diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diarrhea secondary to C. diff. Resident B was to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure potentially hazardous materials were kept secure behind locked doors to prevent residents' potential access to the materials for 3 of 5 days of the survey. Findings include:1. On 12/1/25 at 8:20 a.m., the following was observed in a room near the front entrance of the facility: A room close to the front entrance, labeled Conference Room on a sign to the right of the door was ajar approximately 4-6 inches wide and unlocked. Inside the conference room on the table was a mostly white 16 ounce red-capped bottle sitting on the table; the label on the bottle indicated it was an Rx [Prescription] Destroyer drug disposal all-purpose formula. The bottle appeared mostly full with sticky residue noted around the cap and top of bottle. On the far side of the room from the door, on the floor near a plastic waste receptacle in a clear plastic bag, were eight more bottles of the same appearance and labeling, all full. The labels on the bottle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with enteral feedings physician's orders were followed and equipment was dated for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for enteral feedings. (Resident 6)Finding includes:On 12/1/25 at 10:36 a.m., Resident 6 was observed resting in bed. Next to the bed was a pole with an electronic pump device (kangaroo). Hanging from the pole was a 1000 ml (milliliter) plastic bottle of Osmolite (a type of nutritional supplement) 1.5 cal and was connected to the kangaroo pump but was not connected to Resident 6 at that time. The bottle was observed to be three fourths full of a brown colored liquid. The bottle and tubing was undated. During an interview at that time Resident 6 indicated that he did receive Osmolite 1.5 by G-tube.On 12/1/25 at 11:45 a.m., Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, intestinal bypass and anastomosis status (the surgical creation of a connection between two tubular structures, like blood vessels or loops of intestine), and noninfective…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served in a sanitary manner for 3 of 4 kitchen observations. Staff hair was not covered while in the kitchen. (Dietary [NAME] 2) Findings include: On 11/6/24 from 11:20 a.m. to 11:23 a.m., Dietary [NAME] 2 was observed walking near the steam table area, located next to the grill and steamer, where the noon foods were being held. Dietary [NAME] 2 was observed to have facial hair, approximately one-half inch in length, above and below the lips. The facial hair was observed to not be covered. During a follow-up kitchen observation on 11/6/24 from 11:35 a.m. to 11:40 a.m., Dietary [NAME] 2 was observed at the steam table area taking the noon meal starting temperatures and plating the noon meal. Dietary [NAME] 2 was observed to have facial hair, approximately one-half inch in length, above and below the lips. The facial hair was observed to not be covered. On 11/6/24 from 12:12 p.m. to 12:20 p.m., Dietary [NAME] 2 was observed at the steam table plating the noon meal. Dietary [NAME] 2 was then…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for catheter care. (Resident 3) Finding includes: On 11/6/24 at 11:20 a.m., Resident 3 was observed resting in bed using his laptop computer. A covered urinary catheter bag was observed hanging on the bed frame. On 11/7/24 at 9:21 a.m., Resident 3 was observed resting in bed using his laptop computer. A covered urinary catheter bag was observed hanging on the bed frame. During an interview at that time, Resident 3 indicated he had the indwelling urinary catheter for about a month. On 11/8/24 at 10:00 a.m., Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (a condition that causes bladder control issues due to damage to the nervous system). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/27/24, indicated Resident 3 was cognitively intact. Physician's orders included, but were not limited to, indwelling urinary catheter, start date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's guardian prior to a transfer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transfers requirements. (Resident D) Finding includes: The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 8/19/24 at 1:16 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, epilepsy, alcohol dependence, and vascular dementia. An Order Appointing Guardian Over Incapacitated Person, dated 2/22/23, indicated a guardian was appointed on 2/22/23. A progress note, dated 7/18/24 at 9:34 a.m., indicated Resident D discharged to another facility. All Resident D's belongings were sent with Resident D. The clinical record lacked documentation the guardian was notified prior to Resident D's discharge. During an interview on 8/20/24 at 10:00 a.m., Corporate Nurse 1 indicated there was no additional documentation regarding Resident D's discharge. During an interview on 8/20/24 at 10:45 a.m., LPN 1 indicated Resident D's guardian should have been notified before he was transferred. On 8/20/24 at 10:27 a.m., Corporate Nurse 1 provided a copy of an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written Notice of Transfer/Discharge to the resident's representative prior to a discharge for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transfer and discharge requirements. (Resident D) Finding includes: The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 8/19/24 at 1:16 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, epilepsy, alcohol dependence, and vascular dementia. An Order Appointing Guardian Over Incapacitated Person, dated 2/22/23, indicated a guardian was appointed, on 2/22/23. A progress note, dated 7/18/24 at 9:34 a.m., indicated Resident D discharged to another facility. All Resident D's belongings were sent with Resident D. The clinical record lacked documentation the written Notice of Transfer/Discharge was provided to the resident's representative prior to the discharge. During an interview on 8/20/24 at 10:00 a.m., Corporate Nurse 1 indicated there was no additional documentation regarding Resident D's discharge. On 8/20/24 at 10:27 a.m., Corporate Nurse 1 provided a copy of an undated policy, titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's records were complete and accurate for 2 of 3 residents reviewed. Medications were not documented when administered. (Resident B, Resident C) Finding includes: 1. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 8/19/24 at 10:42 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, gastroesophageal reflux disease and dystonia. The physician's orders included, but were not limited to: - Carbidopa-Levodopa (medication used to treat central nervous system disorders) 25/250 mg (milligrams) tablet, give one tablet by mouth every three hours, started on 1/19/24. - Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen (narcotic pain reliever) 5/325 mg tablet, give one tablet by mouth every 6 hours for pain, started on 7/22/24. - Omeprazole (medication used for acid reflux) 20 mg delayed release capsule, give one capsule by mouth in the morning, started on 1/19/24. The August 2024 MAR (Medication Administration Record), dated from 8/17/24 at 12:00 a.m., through 8/17/24 at 9:00 p.m., indicated Resident B did not receive the following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rights were maintained related to being able to go outside in the facility courtyard unsupervised during non-smoking times for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Residents F, Resident G, Resident H, Resident J, Resident K) Findings Include: 1. During an interview with Resident K on 8/1/24 at 1:00 p.m., he indicated could only go outside in the courtyard during smoking times. He indicated this changed after there was a fight in the gazebo and the Executive Director would not let anyone go out without supervision. Those residents who got in the fight aren't here anymore so residents should be able to go outside. He stated I don't want to be inside all the time with TV. He wanted to go outside and enjoy the beautiful weather. He indicated if you signed out you could go off the property to smoke. 2. During an interview with Resident F on 8/1/24 at 1:14 p.m., he indicated he had been informed by facility staff he was not allowed to go outside to the courtyard to get fresh air at any time unless he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the state health department of an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. Staff observed a scrape with swelling and bruising to the nose and left eye but did not know how the injury occurred. (Resident M) Finding included: The clinical record for Resident M was reviewed on 8/1/24 at 1:30 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, autistic disorder, intellectual disability, and epilepsy. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 7/13/24, indicated Resident M was severely cognitively impaired. A physician's telephone order, dated 7/24/24, indicated x-ray of nose. The order was discontinued. A physician's verbal order, dated 7/25/24 at approximately 3:00 a.m., indicated x-ray of nose due to swelling, mass, lump. An x-ray result, dated 7/25/24 at 9:45 a.m., indicated exam of nasal bones for nasal pain. There was no fracture, dislocation, nor bony destructive lesion noted. Paranasal air cells demonstrate no specific abnormality. No acute traumatic osseous…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin when a resident was observed to have a scrape on his nose with swelling and bruising on his nose and left eye for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident M) Finding includes: The clinical record for Resident M was reviewed, on 8/1/24 1:30 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, autistic disorder, intellectual disability, and epilepsy. A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 7/13/24, indicated Resident M was rarely/never understood. A physician's phone order, dated 7/24/24, indicated x-ray of the nose. A physician's verbal order, dated 7/25/24, indicated x-ray of nose due to swelling, mass, lump. An x-ray result, dated 7/25/24 at 9:45 a.m., indicated exam of nasal bones for nasal pain. There was no fracture, dislocation, nor bony destructive lesion noted. Paranasal air cells demonstrate no specific abnormality. No acute traumatic osseous abnormality. A progress note, dated 7/25/24 at 1:17 p.m., indicated the DON (Director of Nursing)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,428 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $12,428 — penalty dated 2025-04-23
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-27 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN