No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

South River Rehabilitation and Wellness Center

144 Washington Road, Edgewater, MD 21037 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 111 certified beds · (410) 956-5000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2024
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3059 Solomon's Island Rd. Suite F-2
Pharmacy
Safeway0.2 mi
5 Mayo Rd · (301) 261-4661 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
153 Mayo Rd Ste 1 · (571) 699-4502 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Pine Whiff Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.7%20.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.7%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms14.6%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.1%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.3%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.6%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%5.9%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.3%25.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.0%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.3%80.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.3%21.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.5%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.411.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.881.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 289 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
14.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
54.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 54.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 97 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.3%CMS range 56.8–67.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF14.7%CMS range 11.8–17.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge54.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 5.1–11.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.90
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.36
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.59
RN hoursweekends
41.3%
Total nursing turnover
47.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 111 beds and averages 102.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-13)
22
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2019-11-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility investigation, medical records, interviews with facility staff and other pertinent documentation it was determined that the facility failed to 1) notify the physician when it was discovered on 10/14/19, that the side of the tip of Resident #72's penis was discolored (brownish in color) and had a white milky discharge; 2) to document that an assessment was done during the initial findings, which resulted in a delay in treatment, and 3) provide and implement a revised plan of care to meet the resident needs. This was true of 1 (Resident #72) of 45 residents reviewed as part of the annual survey. Based on the findings, on Thursday, October 31st, 2019 at 10:30 AM an Immediate Jeopardy was called related to the quality of care for Resident #72. The facility submitted a revised plan of action at 5:06 PM on 10/31/19 that was reviewed by the surveyors and the Office of Health Care Quality. The plan was accepted on, 10/31/19 at 5:25 PM, but the immediate jeopardy was not removed until…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint investigations, medical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate wound assessment and timely specialist consultation. This was evident for one of one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure ulcers during this Change of Ownership (CHOW) and complaint survey. The findings include:On 5/26/26 at 11:33 AM, the surveyor reviewed complaint #3015772. It was revealed that the complainant expressed concern regarding Resident #1's wound care.A review of Resident #1's medical records revealed a history of multiple transfers and readmissions: the resident was initially admitted on [DATE], transferred to the hospital on 1/17/26, readmitted on [DATE], transferred again on 2/24/26, and readmitted on [DATE].The medical record review further revealed the following documentation gaps and discrepancies:-Initial admission [DATE] - 1/17/26): The Nursing admission Evaluation dated 1/08/26 documented that Resident #1 had pressure ulcers on the sacrum,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint investigation, a review of resident medical records, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor residents' nutritional status regarding body weight and failed to timely address significant weight loss. This was evident for one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for nutrition during this Change of Ownership (CHOW) and complaint survey.The findings include:On 5/26/26 at 11:33 AM, the surveyor reviewed complaint #3015772. It was noted that the complainant expressed concern regarding Resident #1's significant weight loss.A further review of Resident #1's medical records revealed that the resident was initially admitted on [DATE], transferred to the hospital on 1/17/26, readmitted on [DATE], transferred again on 2/24/26, and readmitted on [DATE].During a review of Resident #1's body weight on 5/26/26 at 1:00 PM, the resident's weight was noted and documented as follows:2/06/26: 171.0 lbs (pounds)3/26/26: 156.2 lbs3/27/26: 153.2 lbs4/07/26: 144.6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive care plan specified the level of assistance the resident required for bathing and the resident's frequent refusals of showers for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Refusal of Care, dated 04/2026, indicated, It is the policy of [facility name] to respect and uphold each resident's right to refuse treatment, medication, or any aspect of care. The policy specified, The care plan will be updated to reflect the refusal pattern. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #2 on 03/29/2026. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis of the right shoulder. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/31/2026, revealed Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and facility staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe clean comfortable homelike environment for Residents. This finding was found to be evident in review of Resident rooms on station 2 nursing unit of the facility during the annual recertification survey.The findings include:On 3/9/2026 at 8:30 AM during the initial tour of station 2 nursing unit several Resident rooms were observed with walls, doors, door frames, and sink counters in disrepair and in need of maintenance and repair. Observations included the following rooms: 211 - door/ doorframe marred, 212 - door/doorframe marred, 213 - wall/door marred, 214 - door marred, 215 - tile loose from wall around sink, 216 - door marred, sink counter warped, 217 - doors marred, 218 - tile missing around sink, marred door, no remote for television, 220 - door marred, 221 - wall marred, door marred with chipped wood, 222 - doorframe/ door marred, 225 - doors marred, 226 - doors marred, 227 - doors/walls marred, bedside dresser 2nd drawer not aligned on track, 228 - bathroom wall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to perform accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This was found to be evident for 3 (#3, #45, and #107) of 18 residents observed for coding accuracy of MDS assessments.The findings include:The MDS, is a federally mandated assessment tool, that helps nursing home staff members gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. The information collected drives resident care planning decisions. Accurate MDS assessments ensure each resident receives necessary care. 1) On 3/9/2026 at 11:30 AM the surveyor observed Resident #45 who was sitting in wheelchair in Resident room with left arm in a sling. Resident #45 stated that he/she was going to physical therapy here at the facility because he/she fell at home and broke shoulder. The surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #45's medical record on 3/10/2026 at 2:20 PM. Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #45 fell in the walk-in closet at home and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews and surveyor record review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitation practices in the kitchen and in the nursing unit nourishment refrigerator. This finding was found to be evident in review of the kitchen, service area and the nourishment refrigerator on the nursing unit. The findings include: On the initial tour of the kitchen and service area at 7:45 AM on 3/9/2026 with the Food Services Director (FSD) and District Manager the following were observed: in the dry storage room was a pair of shoes in a plastic recycle bag and 4 boxes of disposable gloves in a cardboard box under the storage rack in the corner on the floor in the walk-in freezer was a personal bag of lunch including a frozen entrée in the corner on the top shelf items on both sides of the service hall outside the kitchen – wheelchair, metal cart, maintenance cart and 3 cardboard boxes with bottles of chemicals directly on the floor The FSD on 3/9/2026 during this initial tour removed the shoes, boxes of gloves and personal bag of lunch from the kitchen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, it was determined that the staff failed to perform consistent hand hygiene in between resident interactions. This was evident for 2 (Staff #19 and #20) out of 2 staff observed during the medication administration task. The findings include: On 03/11/2026 at 7:25 AM, the surveyor observed LPN #19 administering medications to Rooms 121, 122 and 129. The surveyor noted that Staff #19 only performed hand hygiene after leaving room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 03/11/26 at 7:36 AM, the surveyor observed LPN #20 administering medications to rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. The surveyor noted that Staff #20 only performed hand hygiene after leaving rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. On 03/13/26 at 9:55 AM, [NAME] President of Infection Preventionist acknowledged the concerns.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility staff interviews and surveyor record review it was determined that the facility failed to provide notification of room change when a Resident was transferred to another room in the facility. This finding was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #107) out of 10 Residents reviewed for notification of room change.The findings include:The surveyor conducted a record review of the closed medical record for Resident #107 on 3/13/2026 at 6:50 AM related to a complaint that was submitted online to the Office of Healthcare Quality (OHCQ). Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #107 was transferred from room [ROOM NUMBER]-A on station 2 nursing unit to room [ROOM NUMBER]-B on station 1 nursing unit on 2/4/2026. Further review of the medical record revealed that there was no documentation that indicated that Resident #107 and/or Responsible Party were notified of the room change.In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) at 8:38 AM on 3/13/2026 the surveyor conveyed that Resident #107…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physicians and Responsible Party (RP)'s were notified of changes in a resident's condition. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) of 1 resident reviewed for nutrition. The findings include: Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) defines a significant unintentional weight loss as a loss of 5% of body weight in 30 days, 7.5% in 90 days, or 10% in 180 days On 3/9/26 at 8:21 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #6. During the interview Resident #6 stated that he/she was not interested in his/her breakfast and only consumed the drinks. On 3/10/26 at 12:45 PM, the surveyor observed that Resident #6 did not eat his/her lunch but only drank the two juices. On interview Resident #6 stated that he/she did not like what was served for lunch. On 3/11/26 at 11:01 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #6's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #6 had been admitted to the facility in May of 2025 and on 6/2/25 Resident #6' attending physician assessed that Resident #6 lacked adequate decision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and services to maintain hearing abilities. This was evident in 1 (Resident #81) out of 8 residents reviewed for vision and hearing during the recertification survey. The findings include:On 03/09/26 at 9:26 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #81 during the initial observation. The resident tapped their right ear and mouthed bed bath The resident had a journal on their bedside table and confirmed that they use it to communicate with staff. Resident #81 stated they have never worn hearing aids. Shortly after the interview, the resident's roommate reported that staff typically speak loudly when communicating with Resident #81. On 03/13/26 at 7:45 AM, the surveyor conducted another interview with Resident #81. During this interview, the surveyor typed questions for the resident to answer. The resident stated that the facility assessed their hearing well over a month ago and had not followed up. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to clarify and document appropriate care measures to prevent complications from a hand contracture. This was evident for 1 (resident #10) of 1 resident reviewed for mobility. The findings include: A contracture is an abnormal shortening of muscle, tendons, skin, or tissues, causing the resistance to stretching. Failure to protect the palm of the hand when the hand is contracted can result in injury to the palm of the hand caused by the pressure of fingers/fingernails pressing into the palm of the hand. On 3/13/26 at 7:36 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #10 resting in bed. His/her left hand was noted to be contracted, and no splint was applied or visible in the room. Next the surveyor reviewed Resident #10's orders. The review revealed two orders for a left hand splint. The first order was written on 5/29/26 that stated, nursing to don (apply) left hand splint following morning Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The patient should be able to remove following about 4 hours and to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the primary medical provider failed to review the total program of care for 1 (Resident #11) out of 43 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 3/9/26 at 8:38 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #11. During the interview Resident #11 stated that he/she had recently been admitted to the facility after a hospital stay and alleged that the facility was not following his/her transplant drug regimen correctly. On 3/10/26 at 8:01 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #11's medical record. Review of Resident #11's discharge paperwork revealed Resident #11 was discharged to the facility on 2/19/26. The medications were ordered as recommended, however, in the course of stay from the hospital report it was noted that Resident #11's renal function was improving and stable but recommended that Resident #11 needed to have repeat labs such as a Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP) in 1 week. The discharge instructions stated, Labs Needed at Rehab: followed by, please check hematocrit and BMP weekly on Mondays…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the pharmacy failed to deliver the correct medication dosages to the facility. This was evident in 1 (Resident #95) out of 6 residents evaluated for accurate dispensing during the medication administration task. Controlled Medications are substances that have an accepted medical use (medications which fall under US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Schedules II—V), have a potential for abuse, ranging from low to high, and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence. The findings include: On 03/11/26 at 8:00 AM, the surveyor observed a discrepancy between Resident #95's Diazepam order and the pharmacy script. The resident's active order stated: Diazepam 2mg tablet. Give 1.5 tablets by mouth in the morning for anxiety. Please hold for sedation, while the script stated: Diazepam 2 mg tablet. Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for anxiety. The tablets in the bubble packet were only available in one strength and form, consisting of whole 2 mg tablets. On 03/11/26 at 8:03 AM, the surveyor interviewed Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a controlled medication was labeled and stored properly. This was evident for 1 (Resident #95) out of 6 residents observed during the medication administration task. Controlled Medications are substances that have an accepted medical use (medications which fall under US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Schedules II—V), have a potential for abuse, ranging from low to high, and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence. The findings include: On 03/11/26 at 8:00 AM, the surveyor observed a discrepancy in Resident #95's medication order. Staff #19 retrieved a bubble packet for Resident #95 labeled, Diazepam 2 mg tab. Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for anxiety. When the surveyor checked the order in the Medication Administration Record (MAR), the script on the medication bubble packet did not match the active order. The order on the bubble packet had been discontinued on 03/03/26, and the new order was initiated on 03/04/26. The active order was Diazepam 2mg. Give…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dental services on a routine or emergent basis receive necessary or recommended dental services in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (Resident #9) of 1 resident reviewed for dental services during the survey. The findings include: On 3/9/26 at 8:10 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #9. During the interview Resident #9 stated that he/she was still waiting for the facility to follow up on making an appointment for his/her bottom teeth. On 3/11/26 at 7:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #9's medical record. The review revealed that a dental consult note written on 9/11/25 stated that Resident #9 was seen for a tooth extraction. The note stated that the resident was not able to tolerate the procedure and stated the safest course would be extractions under General anesthesia in the hospital setting. The recommendations were to refer Resident # 9 to Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery OMFS at a local hospital. On further review a dental note was written by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Resident and staff interviews, observations and surveyor record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a Resident's food preferences, food intolerances and food allergies were followed. This finding was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #41) out of 8 Residents reviewed for food and nutrition services.The findings include:On 3/9/2026 at 11:15 AM Resident #41 stated to the surveyor that he/she had a food intolerance to dairy products, but he/she continues to receive dairy products on the meal trays.The surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #41's medical record on 3/11/2026 at 10:45 AM. Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #41 had an allergy to dairy products as indicated on the physician orders/order summary report. Further review of the Diet History/Food Preferences assessment completed by the Food Services Director (FSD) on 2/11/2026 revealed that Resident #41 had a food allergy/intolerance to dairy products.In an interview with the FSD at 12:15 PM on 3/11/2026 he stated that Resident #41 had a food preference not to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and facility staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that garbage and refuse was maintained in a proper manner. This finding was found to be evident during the review of the outside dumpster area adjacent to the service hall during the annual recertification survey. The findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen and the outside dumpster area of the facility on 3/9/2026 at 7:45 AM the surveyor with the Food Services Director (FSD) and District Manager in attendance observed the outside dumpster area. There were 2 trash dumpsters outside. One of the trash dumpsters did not have the attached lid closed on the dumpster. In an interview with the FSD on 3/9/2026 the surveyor asked what the expectation was for the lid being closed on the trash dumpster. The FSD stated that the dumpster should have the lid closed. The FSD closed the lid to the trash dumpster. At 2:10 PM on 3/11/2026 the surveyor observed that the door to one of the trash dumpsters outside the facility was opened. There were no staff in attendance at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and facility staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to have call lights accessible for Residents. This finding was found to be evident in 2 (Resident #18 and Resident #75) out of 28 Residents reviewed for accessibility of Resident Call System.The findings include:Resident Call System (or nurse call systems) are essential safety communication tools in nursing homes, enabling Residents and families to alert staff via push-button stations or pull cords. The call station is fixed units in rooms, bathrooms or common areasDuring tour of station 2 nursing unit on 3/9/2026 at 10:15 AM the surveyor observed the attached pull cord/string to the call light device panel next to the toilet in Resident #18's shared bathroom that was short in length. The call light device was not accessible to Resident #18 if he/she was on the floor. Resident #18 was not in his/her room or the bathroom.Additionally, on 3/9/2026 at 12:30 PM the surveyor observed that there was no pull cord/string attached to the call light device panel next to the toilet in Resident #75's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide a resident with an environment that promotes a dignified existence. This was evident for 1 (Resident #349) of 8 residents reviewed for dignity. The findings include: On 12/2/24 at 8:25 AM, an observation was made of Resident #349's room. A clear plastic bag was lining the commode. Inside the bag was a yellow-colored liquid with a piece of toilet paper inside. This Surveyor took a picture of the commode. On 12/2/24 at 8:27 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) #3. When asked why the resident had a plastic bag over the commode, RN #3 stated they were not sure but stated that the resident does things their way. On 12/3/24 at 10:30 AM, an interview was conducted with RN #7. When asked why there was a bag over the commode, the nurse stated they used bags to dispose of the waste when Resident #349 had a stomach infection recently and kept using a plastic bag to line the commode even after the resident was cleared from the infection.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the call bells were within reach of a resident. This was evident in 1 (Resident #79) of 1 resident reviewed for access to the call system during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 12/2/2024 at 8:33 AM, Resident #79's call bell was observed by surveyors on the floor next to their bed. Further observation on 12/4/2024 at 8:36 AM again revealed Resident #79's call bell on the floor. Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #11 was interviewed by surveyors on 12/4/2024 at 8:40 AM. GNA #11 confirmed the call bell was on the floor and picked up the call bell and placed it next to the resident. Resident #79's call bell was observed by surveyors on 12/5/2024 at 8:58 AM to be on the floor behind their bed. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #15 was interviewed at 8:59 AM and stated expectations that the call bell is always within reach of the resident. LPN #15 then picked up the call bell and placed it next to the resident. LPN #15 further stated that there was no clip for the call bell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed: (1.) to provide documentation whether a Resident had an advance directive and/or wished to formulate an advance directive and (2.) to ensure the accuracy of the Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) in place. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #32 and #23) out of 12 residents reviewed for the MOLST and advance directives. The findings include: 1. The surveyor observed Resident #32 on 12/2/2024 at 9:45 AM in bed. Resident #32 was alert and oriented to person, place and time. On 12/3/2024 at 2:00 PM the surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #32's medical record. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An advance directive is a legal document that specifies a person's wishes for end-of-life healthcare. It also specifies who should make healthcare decisions on your behalf if you are unable to do so yourself. During the record review of Resident #32's medical record it revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview during facility environmental observations, it was determined that the facility staff (1.) failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe homelike interior and (2.) failed to exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from the wandering residents. This was evident for 1 of 8 rooms and 1 (Resident #67) out of 3 residents observed during the annual survey. The findings include: 1a. On 12/2/24 at 1 PM surveyors conducted an environmental tour which revealed: - room [ROOM NUMBER]: the baseboard on the wall adjacent to the resident's closet had visible damage- jagged edges where pieces of the baseboard were missing. - Circular shaped brown stains on two ceiling tiles in the shower room on the 200 unit One of the stained areas measured 6 inches in diameter and the other area measured 2 inches in diameter. - A structural wall to the left upon entrance into the shower room on the 200 unit with two capped copper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a safe resident environment and protect residents from abuse from other residents. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #22 [1.] and #113 [2.]) out of 9 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings included: 1. Record review, on 12/05/24 at 9:05 AM, found that staff GNA #30 witnessed Resident #103 on 4/14/23 at 4:30 PM that Resident #103 undressed while standing at Resident #22's bed side and had his/her hands in Resident #22's private area on. Immediately, GNA #30 called LPN staff #31 to assist and they removed Resident #103 out of Resident #22's room and started the one-to-one supervision. Additionally, they notified the local police about the abuse. No other residents were affected after the facility staff done the investigation. Resident #103 was arrested by the local police that night and had not returned to the facility since. During Interview, on 12/5/2024 at 09:55 AM, the Administrator stated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide the Resident and/or Representative with a written notice of the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer to an acute care facility. This was evident for 2 (Resident #54 [1.] and #34 [2.]) of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1. On 12/3/24 at 1:53 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #54's medical record. The review revealed that resident #54 was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. On 12/4/24 at 12:24 AM, the surveyor reviewed the transfer documents that were sent to the hospital. A bed hold was filled out on 12/1/24 by Unit Manager Staff #15 indicating that Resident #54 wanted a bed hold. There was no indication on the form that the resident and/or representative was informed or contacted to place the bed hold. On 12/4/24 at 12:57 PM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Staff #15 and the Director of Nursing (DON). During the interview Staff #15 reported that she initiated the bed hold…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility staff interview and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately document resident assessments on the MDS (Minimum Data Set) as evidenced by inaccurate coding for residents. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #42 [1.] and #79 [2.]) out of 2 residents reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. The findings include: 1. A colostomy is a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the colon (large intestine). The opening is called a stoma. A bag called a stoma appliance is placed around the opening to allow stool to drain. On 12/2/2024 at 10:45 AM the surveyor observed Resident #42 in bed in the resident's room. The resident was observed with a colostomy bag on the abdomen. The surveyor interviewed Registered Nurse (RN) Unit Manager #8 on 12/5/2024 at 10:15 AM. The surveyor asked the RN, Unit Manager #8, if Resident #42 had a colostomy and if Resident #42 was admitted to the facility with a colostomy. The RN Unit Manager #8 stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate a new pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) Level I screen after a resident was diagnosed with bipolar disorder while admitted to nursing facility. This was identified for 1 (Resident #49) of 1 resident reviewed for PASARR requirements during an recertification survey. The findings include: According to the State Operations Manual, The PASARR process requires that all applicants to Medicaid-certified nursing facilities be screened for possible serious mental disorders, intellectual disabilities and related conditions. This initial screening is referred to as Level I Identification of individuals with mental disorder (MI) or intellectual disorder (ID), and is completed prior to admission to a nursing facility. The purpose of the Level I pre-admission screening is to identify individuals who have or may have MD/ID or a related condition, who would then require PASARR Level II evaluation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to include all initial healthcare information in the baseline care plan. This was found evident of 1 (resident #94) of 5 residents reviewed for care planning. The findings include: On 12/5/24 at 10:04 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #94's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]rd 2024. Further review revealed that Resident #94 had a past medical history that included, but not limited to, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), malaise (weakness) disease of the digestive system and dementia. Next the surveyor reviewed Resident #94's care plan. Care plan topics were first initiated on 10/3/24 and included activities of daily living, risk for pain and risk for falls. On 10/4/24 additional care plans were added to include the need for enhanced barrier precautions, risk for bleeding, congestive heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure)/atrial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was found to be evident of 3 (Resident #94 [1.], #77 [2.] & #42 [3.]) of 13 Residents reviewed for care planning. The findings include: 1. On 12/5/24 at 10:04 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #94's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #94 was admitted to the facility in October of 2024. Further review revealed that Resident #94 had a past medical history of urinary retention and malaise (weakness). On 12/5/24 at 11:16 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #94 resting in bed with a urinary bag hanging on the side of the bed. Next the surveyor reviewed Resident #94's care plan. No care plan was noted for an indwelling urinary device. On further review a care plan for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs ) that was initiated on 10/3/24 indicated that Resident #94 was dependent, needing substantial/maximal assistance, and totally dependent for hygiene, shower/bath, lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review it was determined that the facility failed to update and revise resident's care plans. This was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #42) out of 3 residents reviewed for care plan timing and revision. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems of residents. Apixaban (brand name Eliquis) is a prescription anticoagulant medication that helps prevent and treat blood clots. It works by inhibiting factor Xa, a clotting factor, which slows blood clotting. Clonazepam (brand name Klonopin) is a prescription benzodiazepine medication used to prevent and treat anxiety disorders and seizures and promote relaxation. Clonazepam produces a calming effect on the brain and nerves. On 12/5/2024 at 8:30 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for dependent residents. This was found evident in 2 (Resident #449[1.] & #68[2.]) out of 11 Residents reviewed for Activity of Daily Living (ADL) cares. The findings include: 1. On 12/2/24 at 2:13 PM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #449. During the interview Resident #449 stated that he/she had concerns about ostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the abdominal wall to allow waste to exit the body) cares. On 12/5/24 at 11:08 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #449's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #449 had a care plan initiated on 11/18/24 that stated, Resident #449 has an alteration in bowel elimination related to need for ileostomy (an ostomy in which the opening is the end of the ileum, the lowest part of the small intestine). An intervention listed was, provide assistance with ostomy care as needed. On further review a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, that was completed on 10/20/24, documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatments according to a resident's plan of care. This was found evident of 2 (Resident #71 & #94) out of 32 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1a) On 12/2/24 at 10:12 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #71. During the interview Resident #71 stated that he/she had problems with constipation. Resident #71 further stated that he/she was given Miralax (a medication used to prevent and treat constipation) but still could go 2-3 days without having a bowel movement. On 12/5/24 at 8:43 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #71's medical record. The review revealed Resident #71 had a care plan initiated on 3/28/23 that stated Resident #71 is at risk for constipation related to decreased mobility. An intervention listed was to administer medications per medical provider's order. On further review the surveyor noted a progress note written by Nurse Practitioner (NP) Staff #22 written on 9/19/24. The note stated that Resident #71 complained of occasional hard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure to coordinate vision services for a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #77) of 8 residents reviewed for vision. The findings include: On 12/02/24 at 11:20 AM, an observation and interview of Resident #77 was conducted. It was noted that the resident had one lens on the left side of their glasses and no lens on the other side. When asked how long ago the resident had lost their lens, the resident stated it was months ago at the facility. The resident stated they let the staff know their lens fell out, but there was never any follow up. When asked if they knew when their last ophthalmologist appointment was, the resident stated they had not seen an ophthalmologist since admission to the facility. On 12/05/24 at 10:04 AM, Resident #77's records were reviewed. A consult for Audiology, Dental, Optometry, Ophthalmology and/or Podiatry as needed was ordered on 6/20/2024 at 17:04 (5:04 PM) . The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect the resident from a preventable accidents. This was evident for 1 (Resident #104) of 3 residents reviewed for falls. The findings include: On 12/06/24 at 10:17 AM, a review of complaint #MD00200713 was conducted. The complaint indicates that on 12/10/23, Resident #104 fell off the bed while a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) was providing incontinent care. After the providers evaluation the provider recommended to monitor and manage the resident for pain. The resident and family decided to call 911 to get further evaluation. On 12/06/24 at 10:22 AM, a review of Resident #104's records was conducted. The records indicated that the resident was evaluated at hospital for possible injuries after a fall on 12/10/23. Per hospital discharge summary, there were no injuries or fractures identified after x-rays and evaluation. On 12/6/24 at 10:45 AM, Resident #104's Multiple Data Set (MDS) was reviewed. An MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool used in nursing homes to evaluate the health needs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident observation, staff interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate care and services for a resident that required colostomy care. This was found to be evident in 1 Resident #42 out of 1 Resident reviewed for colostomy care and services. The findings include: A colostomy is a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the colon (large intestine). The opening is called a stoma. A bag called a stoma appliance is placed around the opening to allow stool to drain. On 12/2/2024 at 10:45 AM the surveyor observed Resident #42 in bed in Resident room. The resident was observed with a colostomy bag on the abdomen. The surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #42's medical record on 12/5/2024 at 8:30 AM. The medical record review, specifically the physician orders, revealed that Resident #42 did not have a physician order for the care of the colostomy. The surveyor interviewed Registered Nurse (RN) Unit Manager #8 on 12/5/2024 at 10:15 AM. The surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and medical record review it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services appropriately. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #21) out of 1 resident that was reviewed for respiratory care and services. The findings include: On 12/2/2024 at 10:35 AM the surveyor conducted a tour of Unit 200 and observed Resident #21 in the resident's room with oxygen in use. The surveyor observed that Resident #21 did not have an oxygen in use - no smoking signage on Resident #21's door to the resident's room. The Medication/Treatment Administration Record (MAR/TAR) is a standardized record that organizes essential information about a resident and the prescribed medication and treatment. This vital document supports healthcare providers by tracking doses, preventing errors, and providing a clear record of care. The surveyor conducted a record review on 12/4/2024 at 7:30 AM of Resident #21's medical record. This record review revealed that Resident #21 had a physician order for continuous oxygen and had a care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and observation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that pain management of an intrathecal baclofen pump was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice and monitoring appropriately for effectiveness and/or adverse consequences. This was found to be evident for 1 resident (#22) out of 1 for pain management review. The findings included: A baclofen pump is a surgically implanted device that delivers baclofen, a muscle relaxant medication, directly into the spinal canal to treat spasticity and other conditions. The pump's battery typically lasts around six to seven years. When the battery dies, the pump needs to be replaced with a surgical procedure. The pump needs to be refilled regularly, usually every four to six months. A needle is inserted through the skin into the refill port to add baclofen. Complications can occur, including catheter disconnections, migration, kinks, obstruction, and pump…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to have the medical provider thoroughly review and accurately document a resident's updated plan of care after a visit. This was found evident of 1 (Resident #106) out of 32 reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 12/11/24 at 6:31 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #106's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #106 was admitted to the facility in late March of 2024 and was sent to the hospital in early April 2024 related to mental status changes, hypotension (low blood pressure), tachycardia (high heart rate) and increased creatinine and white blood cell count. Resident #106 returned to the facility with a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube or feeding tube related to his/her dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). After two days back at the facility Resident #106 then returned to the hospital due to a dislodged PEG tube and came back to the facility on 5/1/24 with a new tube placed. Next the surveyor reviewed Resident #106's orders. The review revealed Resident #106 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. This was evident for 2 (Resident #94 and #106) or 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1a) On 12/5/24 at 10:04 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #94's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #94 was admitted to the facility in October of 2024. Further review revealed a progress note written by Nurse Practitioner (NP) Staff #23 on 12/4/24 related to Resident #94's abnormal lab values. Staff #23 documented Resident #94 had a low sodium and magnesium lab. The note further stated that she collaborated with the attending and a new order for sodium chloride 2 grams would be written and magnesium oxide 400 milligrams would be increased to two tables twice a day. On 12/6/24 at 7:25 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #94's December Medication Administration Record (MAR). The review revealed that Resident #94 had an order that started on 11/26/24 for sodium chloride 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and resident records, it was determined that the facility failed to coordinate routine dental services for a resident. It was evident for 1 (Resident #68) of 8 residents reviewed for dental services. The findings include: On 12/03/24 at 9:30 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #68's representative. The representative stated that on 10/28/24 they visited the resident, and upon their observation the resident's teeth were black. On 12/03/24 at 9:45 AM, Complaint #MD00211334 was reviewed. This complaint expressed concerns with Resident #68's dental care and appointments. On 12/04/24 at 10:40 AM, a review of Resident #68's orders was conducted. An order for a dental consult was made on 8/28/23. On 12/04/24 at 1:52 PM, a review of resident records was conducted. The resident was last seen by the Dental Group on 10/30/23. On the dental note of 10/30/23, the recommendation for the resident was to be seen every 6 months for cleaning with a next annual appointment date of 10/30/24. On 12/04/24 at 1:55 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to keep accurate resident records in accordance with professional standards. This was evident of 1 (Resident #54) out of 32 residents reviewed for accuracy of documentation during the survey. The findings include: On 12/3/24 at 1:53 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #54 ' s medical record. The review revealed that Resident #54 was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. Next the surveyor reviewed the transfer form for Resident #54 dated 12/1/24. The review revealed in the dedicated section titled; Resident Representative Notification, the date and time of 12/1/24 at 12 PM were there, however, the name of the representative was left blank. On 12/4/24 at 12:54 PM, the surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff #27. The surveyor asked Staff #27 if she notified Resident #54's representative of the transfer to the hospital. Staff #27 stated she notified Resident #54's representative however, she didn't lock the note until…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow proper infection control practices when handling a resident's waste. This was evident for 1 (Resident #349) of 8 residents reviewed for infection control. The findings include: On 12/2/24 at 8:25 AM, an observation was made of Resident #349's room. A clear plastic bag was lining the commode. Inside the bag was a yellow-colored liquid with a piece of toilet paper inside. This Surveyor took a picture of the commode. On 12/2/24 at 8:27 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) #3. When asked why the resident had a plastic bag over the commode, RN #3 stated they were not sure but stated that the resident does things their way. On 12/3/24 at 10:30 AM, an interview was conducted with RN #7. When asked why there was a bag over the commode, the nurse stated they used bags to dispose of the waste when Resident #349 had a stomach infection recently and kept using the plastic bag even after the resident was cleared from the infection. When asked how the waste was disposed of, he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify and obtain consent from a resident representative for immunizations. This was evident for 1 (Resident #92) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations during recertification survey. The findings include: Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is an assessment tool used to identify cognitive impairment in long-term care facilities and nursing homes. It's a mandatory tool for new residents and is also used regularly to track a resident's cognitive functioning over time. The BIMS score ranges from 0-15, with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff members gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. The information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. Resident #92's medical records were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility pest control records and interviews of facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program as flying gnats were observed throughout the building. This was found to be evident during the survey. The findings include: On 12/02/24 at 9 AM, during a tour of the 200 unit, surveyors observed gnats in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s toilet room. On 12/02/24 at 12 noon, surveyors were standing near the entrance of room [ROOM NUMBER] and observed gnats flying near their faces. On 12/03/24 at 9 AM surveyors interviewed, the Food Service Director, Staff #6, who confirmed that the kitchen had gnats by the floor drains and the juice machine. In addition, Staff #6 stated that the maintenance department was contacted at that time to address the issue. On 12/03/24 at 11:30 AM surveyors conducted a review of all maintenance records for room [ROOM NUMBER] which did not reveal any pest control visits or maintenance interventions for gnats. Further review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 10/29/2019 an environmental tour of the facility was conducted as part of the survey process and in regards to complaint MD00140781. At 9:47 AM observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed broken ceiling tiles in the bathroom around the air vent and cove molding which was separating from the wall beneath the toilet paper holder. A pair of sweatpants was observed draped over the handicap assist bars in the bathroom approximately 1 foot from the open toilet. At 10:42 AM room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with missing cove molding behind the toilet and exposed drywall on the wall near the floor. Additionally at 10:42 AM the air intake vent opposite Nurse Station 1 was observed with excess grey dust and debris. The Station 2 Spa Room was inspected at 11:51 AM revealing pink and black buildup in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical records review, and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the physician that the resident missed their scheduled Nephrologist (Kidney physician) appointment. This was true for 1 of 45 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for notification during the complaint survey. The findings include: During an interview with Resident #33 on 10/25/19 at 1:30 PM the resident revealed that he/she was upset because the facility messed up with transportation and that he/she missed the kidney doctor appointment. On 10/29/19 at 12:00 PM Resident #33's medical records were reviewed. This review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in May 2019 for rehabilitation and with diagnosis which included Chronic Kidney Disease stage 5. A person with stage 5 chronic kidney disease has end stage renal disease (ESRD). At this advanced stage of kidney disease, the kidneys have lost nearly all their ability to do their job effectively, and eventually dialysis or a kidney transplant is needed to live. Medical records reviewed revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interview and review of Facility Reports MD00145732 and MD00146337, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This was evident for 2 of 45 residents (Resident #78 and Resident # 75) reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1. On 10/28/2019 a review of the facility's investigation for facility report MD00145732 was conducted. The facility confirmed that a GNA #28 had taken a resident's (Resident #78) bank card and withdrawn $200. This GNA never repaid Resident #78. Interview with Resident #78 on 10/29/2019 at 10:42 AM confirmed that the bank card was lent to the GNA #28 with the understanding that the money withdrawn would be repaid. Further review of the facility's Employee Handbook revealed a section on Gratuities in which employees are instructed to never borrow money from a resident or his/her family members. Interview with the Administrator on 11/6/2019 at 11:06 AM confirmed that the GNA #28 was no longer employed by the facility and the incident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews with the resident family and facility staff it was determined the facility failed to organize and invite the Resident and/or Responsible Party (RP) to a care plan conferences. This was found to be evident for 1 resident (Resident #34) reviewed for care plans during the survey. Findings include: An interview was conducted with the RP for Resident #34 on 10/25/19 at 2:05 PM to discuss concerns involving the resident. The RP stated that the facility has not contacted him/her in over a year regarding a care plan meeting. Review of the documentation provided by the facility revealed a letter dated 10/27/19 for a care plan meeting scheduled on 11/19/19 for Resident #34. The facility was unable to provide any other letters that were mailed inviting the RP to attend a care plan conference. An interview was conducted on 11/1/19 at 10:03 AM with the Social Work Director (SWD). The SWD stated that she started working for the facility June of 2019 and upon her arrival she was able to determine from her assessment that Long Term Care (LTC) had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical records, review of facility investigative material, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents going outside were safe to do so without supervision. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #189) reviewed for accidents. The findings include: Resident #189's medical record was reviewed on 10/28/19 at 12:00 PM. During the review, it was determined that the resident was admitted to the facility at the end of September 2018, and eloped 3 days after admission. The resident's admitting diagnoses included a recent stroke that the resident was hospitalized for and then transferred to the facility for rehabilitation. A screen for the resident's elopement risk was completed on the day of admission and indicated that the resident was not an elopement risk. Nursing assessments completed in the first three days of the resident's stay indicated that the resident was alert and oriented to self, but not to place or situation. Review of the facility's investigation regarding Resident #189's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical records and interview with residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with as-needed pain medication regimens received pain medication according to physician prescribed parameters. This was evident for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Pain Management. The findings include: A numeric pain scale is a common tool to evaluate a resident's perception of his or her own pain. The resident is asked to rate pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain of your life). The American Nurse's Association defines severe pain as number 7-10 on that scale. Other references include the numbers 6-10 as severe pain. Resident #1's medical record was reviewed on 10/28/2019 at 10:42 AM. During the review, it was noted that the resident was prescribed as-needed narcotic pain medication for severe pain. Resident #1's medication administration record (MAR) was reviewed for the duration of the resident's most recent stay. The review revealed that the resident was administered the as-needed narcotic pain medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-06 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of abnormal laboratory results and failed to fax the results of the laboratory results to the kidney specialist. This was found to be evident for 1 of 45 residents (Resident #33) reviewed during the investigation stage of the survey. The findings include: On 10/30/19 Resident #33's medical records were reviewed. This review revealed a physician order to obtain an Intact PTH, phosphorus and 25 OH vitamin D and fax the laboratory results when they arrive. Review of the medical records revealed the results of the phosphorus and Vitamin D dated 8/30/19. Further review of the laboratory results failed to reveal any documentation indicating that the physician was aware of the results nor could the facility provide any documentation indicating that the results were faxed to the consulting office. During an interview with the Director of Nursing and the Unit Manager of Unit 2 RN #7 on 10/30/19 the surveyor asked for any documentation showing that the physician and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain a medical record in the most accurate form for residents. This was evident for 2 of 45 residents (Resident #65 and #88) reviewed during the survey. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. Records must be complete, accurately documented, readily accessible and systematically organized. 1. On 11/5/2019 at 9:54 AM Resident #65's monthly pharmacist assessments were reviewed. Resident #65 was found to have irregularities noted and/or recommendations made on 7/5, 7/10, 7/14, 8/12 and 8/14/2019 by the pharmacist. The electronic record showed that an irregularity was noted and/or recommendations were made however neither the electronic record nor the hard chart specified what the irregularities/recommendations were. At 10:41 AM the Director of Nursing (Staff #2) was asked to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OMG RE LEASING CO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/04/2008
OHI ASSET (MD) EDGEWATER, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/18/2008
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
STOLTZ, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/04/2008
WILHEIM, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/04/2008
WASHINGTON (MD) MGMT. CO., LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/04/2008
COLEMAN, PHYLLISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/30/2019
GROVES, DONNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
RIEDINGER, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/18/2022
ODENTHAL, RICHARDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$780K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 13%Other / private 8%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $780K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$359per resident / day
operating cost
$10,915per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$385per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215297. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next