No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Marley Neck Rehabilitation and Wellness Center

7575 East Howard Road, Glen Burnie, MD 21060 · For profit - Corporation · 95 certified beds · (410) 768-8200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 768-8200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 2018Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (20% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2018
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
7445 E Furnace Branch Rd · (410) 768-1380 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7901 Ritchie Hwy · (410) 761-3341 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7701 Baltimore Annapolis Blvd · (215) 833-4108 · Call to confirm hours
Park
103 Mountain Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.7%20.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.9%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.2%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.4%2.4%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened30.6%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.9%16.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%5.9%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.5%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.6%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.0%80.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.1%21.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.3%9.8%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 285 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 107 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.4%CMS range 54.5–66.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.2%CMS range 10.4–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge57.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.0%CMS range 7.7–13.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.191.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
1.05
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.78
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
20.3%
Total nursing turnover
9.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 89.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-30)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2022-05-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of an email and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse to the state agency. This deficient practice was evidenced in 1 (#4) of 2 allegations of abuse reviewed during the complaint survey.The findings include:On 03/11/26 at 4:01pm during an interview with Resident #4 the surveyor asked about the incident when the Geriatric Nursing Assistant's (GNA) were talking about them as if they were not present. The resident verbalized they sent an email to Administrator #1 and Director of Nursing (DON) #2 about the incident.On 03/12/26 at 11:14 am during an interview with Administrator #1 she verbalized Resident #4 emailed them about their concern, but she was out sick and DON #2 was at a hearing. Administrator #1 provided the surveyor a copy of the email. Resident #4 sent an email to Administrator #1 and DON #2 on 12/09/25 at 12:57 am reporting while GNA #16 and GNA #17 were providing care the night before, they were making comments about the resident. Administrator #1 verbalized they missed the email and did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of email and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to investigate an allegation of verbal abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced in 1 (#4) of 2 allegations of abuse reviewed during the complaint survey.The findings include:On 03/11/26 at 4:01pm during an interview with Resident #4 the surveyor asked about the incident when the Geriatric Nursing Assistant's (GNA) who were talking about them as if they were not present. The resident verbalized an email was sent to Administrator #1 and Director of Nursing (DON) #2 about the incident.On 03/12/26 at 11:14 am during an interview with Administrator #1 she verbalized Resident #4 emailed them about their concern, but she was out sick and DON #2 was at a hearing. Administrator #1 provided the surveyor a copy of the email. Resident #4 sent an email to Administrator #1 and DON #2 on 12/09/25 at 12:57AM reporting while GNA #16 and GNA #17 were providing care the night before, they were making comments about the resident. Administrator #1 verbalized they missed the email and did not address Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to document a resident's pain score after administering pain medication and failed to administer oxygen therapy and report to the provider a resident's oxygen saturation decreased to 86%-87%. This deficient practice was evidenced in 1 (#3) of 5 resident records reviewed during the complaint survey.The findings are:1. On 03/10/26 at 9:06 am a review of Resident #3 medication administration record (MAR) the resident was prescribed Methadone 10 mg PO (by mouth) BID (twice a day) for pain and Oxycodone 10 mg q (every) 8 hours PRN (as needed) for pain. On 02/06 @7:33 am Licensed Practical Nurse # documented they administered Oxycodone 10 mg PO to the resident. Resident #3 pain score was documented as 6. When the surveyor checked the electronic health record (EHR) there was no documentation to verify the pain medication was effective.On 03/10/26 at 11:14 am during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #18 the surveyor asked when pain medication is administered to a resident does the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews it was determined that the facility staff provided a resident with a wheelchair without assessing if the wheelchair was safe for use. This deficient practice was evidenced in 2 (#4 & #8) of 2 residents reviewed for having necessary equipment.The findings include: 1. On 03/11/26 at 5:20 pm a review of a Concern Form dated 02/06/26 revealed Resident #4 requested footrests for their wheelchair. There was a note indicating Rehab Director #12 had difficulty finding footrests for Resident #4's wheelchair because of the size of the wheelchair.On 03/12/26 at 12:01pm during an interview with Rehab Director #12 the surveyor asked did they ensure the resident had leg rests on their wheelchair. Rehab Director #12 verbalized they are having difficulty finding the legs rests that fit the resident's wheelchair. The prongs were wider than the standards rest; they don't stay in place. They tried modifications to keep the pieces together. Rehab Director #12 advised Resident #4 legs were propped up on chairs when their legs got tired while receiving therapy, however…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the dome food covers were dry before covering residents' plated food. This deficient practice was evidenced in 2 of 7 observations of the kitchen staff plating residents' food during the complaint survey.The findings are:On 03/10/26 at 8:18am during the modified kitchen tour the surveyor observed the kitchen staff preparing the residents' food. The surveyor observed Dietary Aide #5 place dome food covers with standing water over Resident #6 and Resident #7's plates. The surveyor requested Dietary Aide #5 to lift the dome food covers from the residents' trays and observed liquid in Resident #6's pureed food and liquid on Resident #7's bacon and on the plate. The surveyor observed wet dome shaped food lids stacked on top of each other near the tray line. Certified Dietary Manager #4 removed the plates from the tray line.On 03/17/26 at 10:02 am during an interview with Dietary Aide #5, they verbalized they thought the lids were already dry because they were cleaned the night before. They…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in proper operating conditions. This was evident for 2 of 4 pieces of equipment assessed in the kitchen during the complaint survey.The findings include:All essential kitchen equipment must be maintained in safe operating condition in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and remain accessible throughout kitchen operations.On 03/11/26 at 11:43 am the surveyor observed the kitchen staff preparing lunch trays. The last cart left the kitchen at 12:25 pm. The kitchen staff continued to prepare lunch trays that were unable to be placed in the cart due to the lack of space. The kitchen staff prepared a test tray for the surveyor.On 03/11/26 at 1:00 pm the surveyor tested temperatures of the food for a regular try. The temperatures wereHam 118.8 degrees FSweet potatoes 121.3 degrees FCollard greens 120.9 degrees [NAME] 03/17/26 at 10:51 am during an interview with Certified Dietary Manager #4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment for residents and staff. This deficient practice was evident based on observations in the kitchen during the complaint survey. The findings include:On 03/11/26 at 11:56 am while in the kitchen the surveyor observed different colored particles on the base of the food lid rack, copious black dust on the exhaust fan, and the front of the PTAC heat/air conditioner unit was detached from the unit. On 03/12/26 at 12:46 pm during an interview with Maintenance Director #13 the surveyor asked if there was a preventative maintenance schedule and the surveyor reported the maintenance issues observed in the kitchen. Maintenance Director #13 verbalized they have an app called TELS that the employees use to submit maintenance concerns. Sometimes it's word of mouth and the staff will tell them about issues. They have a monthly and a weekly schedule that's a part of TELS. Usually, the kitchen comes up every month. They inspect the dishwasher water temps, sometimes the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on incident report, record review, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to change the brief of Resident #5 and #6. This was evident for 2 out of 6 residents reviewed during the complaint survey.Findings Include:1) On 8/16/25, a family member of Resident #5 sent in complaint stating the resident was left on several occasions with stool and urine in his/her diaper. On the GNA (Geriatric Nursing Assistant) documentation sheet for the month of March and April 2025, the documentation shows that resident was not changed on 3/28/25 day and night shift and on 3/31/25 night shift. The Director of Nursing (DON) was made aware on 10/15/25 and she stated she would look into this.2) On 10/15/25 at 9:45 AM an interview was held with Resident #6 who is alert and oriented with a BIMS score of 14/15, indicating he/she is cognitively intact and can make his/her needs known. Resident #6 stated he/she normally does not have a problem with getting changed, however last eve he/she stated they put the call bell on at 7:30PM and a GNA (Geriatric Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical chart review, it was determined that the facility failed to place CPAP on resident every night. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) out of 1 resident reviewed for CPAP usage during the complaint survey.The findings include:On 10/15/25 at 10:45 AM, the surveyor went to room [ROOM NUMBER]-2 to interview Resident # 6 about the care he/she is receiving. The resident has been at this facility since 10/6/25 and has a history of COPD and respiratory failure. Resident #6 is alert and oriented and can make all needs known. The resident was ordered a CPAP machine for sleep Apnea. A CPAP machine (continuous positive airway pressure) machine is one of the most common treatments for sleep apnea. It keeps your airways open while you sleep so you can receive the oxygen you need. CPAP machines can significantly improve sleep quality and reduce your risk for a number of health issues, including heart disease and stroke.Resident #6 stated that he/she wears the CPAP machine when he/she can. I asked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a manner that maintains professional standards of food service safety. This practice had the potential to affect all residents eating food prepared by the facility's kitchen. The findings include: During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 6/16/25 at 08:00 AM with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the following items were found open, unlabeled, and undated. 1. Frozen Omelets were found in a clear plastic bag on a shelf in the freezer. The bag was open and not labeled or dated. 2. An opened container of Tajín seasoning was found on a shelf in the kitchen area. It was not labeled or dated. During an interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 6/16/25 at 9:00 AM, he stated that the items found unlabeled should have been dated after opening. On 6/16/25 at 9:05 AM, the CDM was made aware of the findings and acknowledged the concerns. An observation with the CDM and District Manager was conducted on 6/20/25 at 7:05 AM of a food cart for breakfast service in A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 44 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, review of facility-reported incident investigation and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an incident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #59) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse during the recertification survey. The findings include: A Hoyer lift, also known as a patient lift, is a mechanical device used to safely lift and transfer individuals who are unable to move themselves, often due to mobility limitations. On 6/16/25 at 11:11 AM, in an interview with Resident #59, he/she stated that a Geriatric Nurse Assistant (GNA) was rough when he/she was transferred from wheelchair to bed. He/she added that he/she was supposed to be transferred via Hoyer lift, however, the GNA picked him/her up from my wheelchair and transferred him/her manually to the bed. On 6/27/2025 at 8:09 AM, a review of facility-reported incident MD00211974 revealed that on 11/19/24 at 6:00 PM, Resident #59 was transferred by GNA #10 from the wheelchair to the bed without using a lift. The allegation was confirmed with a statement provided by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the resident's discharge status on the Discharge MDS assessment. This was evident for 1 (Resident #88) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the recertification survey. The findings include: Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a core set of screening, clinical, and functional status data elements, including common definitions and coding categories, which form the foundation of a comprehensive assessment for all residents of nursing homes certified to participate in Medicare or Medicaid. According to the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, discharge assessments include the completion of a select number of MDS items in order to track residents when they enter or leave a facility. A Discharge Assessment-Return Not Anticipated (DCRNA) must be completed when the resident is discharged from the facility and the resident is not expected to return to the facility within 30 days while a Discharge On 6/20/25 at 7:20 AM, a review of Resident #88's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews and facility staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate care plans based on medication use. This was evident for 2 (Residents #4, #32) out of 36 residents reviewed for care plan implementation during a recertification survey process. The findings include: A care plan details the daily support an individual requires to maintain quality of life, including personal care, medication, meals, social interaction, and mobility assistance. It ensures coordinated care across caregivers and service providers. On 6/18/25 at 6:35 AM, a review of Resident #32's medical record revealed a physician order dated 3/21/25 for busPIRone HCl 5 mg oral tablet. The order directs staff to administer 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for treatment of anxiety. On 6/18/25 at 12:49 PM, further review of the medical record revealed that the facility failed to initiate a care plan related to antianxiety medication to reflect the plan of care for Resident #32. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 6/18/25 at 1:49 PM regarding Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to apply a preventative brace ordered for a resident. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #1) out of 1 resident reviewed for quality of care. The findings include: Foot drop is an inability to lift the front part of the foot and toes. This can be caused by nerve injuries, muscle disorders, brain or spinal cord disorders (such as stroke). If foot drop persists, the muscles that point the foot downward can become tight and lead to a contracture. A foot drop brace, is designed to support the ankle and foot. The brace extends from the calf, wraps around the ankle, and extends under the foot, often inside the shoe. It provides support and can help lift the foot, preventing it from dropping and allowing for a more normal gait. An Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) is a brace worn on the lower leg to support the ankle and foot. It is commonly used to treat foot drop by holding the foot in a proper position to prevent dragging…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not 5% or greater. This was evident for 2 (Resident #74 and #82) out of 6 residents observed for medication administration. 2 errors were discovered out of 38 opportunities. The findings include: According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) the Medication error rate is determined by calculating the percentage of medication errors observed during a medication administration observation. The numerator in the ratio is the total number of errors that the survey team observes, both significant and non-significant. The denominator consists of the total number of observations or opportunities for errors and includes all the doses the survey team observed being administered plus the doses ordered but not administered. The equation for calculating a medication error rate is as follows: Medication Error Rate = Number of Errors Observed divided by the Opportunities for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the staff followed infection control protocols. This was found to be evident during the review of (1) medication administration and (2) laundry services, it has the ability to affect all residents. The findings include: 1) On 6/18/25 at 9:09 AM, this surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 administering medications to residents. At that time, it was observed that LPN #1 did not perform hand hygiene before entering the room to administer medication to Resident #82 and Resident #60. On 6/18/25 at 9:43 AM, this surveyor also observed that LPN #1 did not wipe down the blood pressure cuff or the pulse oximeter probe between use on Resident #82 and Resident #60. On 6/18/25 at 9:59 AM, this surveyor conducted an interview with LPN #1 to discuss concerns regarding infection control practices during medication administration. It was explained that the surveyor observed a failure to perform hand hygiene before entering residents' rooms, as well as a failure to disinfect the blood pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the resident's bathroom call system was functioning properly. This evident for 1 of multiple rooms observed during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 6/24/25 at 1:02 PM, in an interview with Resident #47, he/she stated that she fell in the bathroom on 6/23/25. He/she added that he/she attempted to pull the bathroom call cord to alert the staff, however, he/she was unsuccessful. He/she described the the cord got stuck and was not functioning, so he/she started yelling and maneuvered themselves towards the switch and slid the on/off switch for the call bell to activate. During an observation, the surveyor noted that the bathroom call cord was attached to a switch on the wall; the cord was hanging approximately 2 inches from the floor and the switch was 40 inches from the floor. Also, the surveyor attempted to pull the cord to activate the switch and confirmed that the pull cord was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and facility staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Resident was provided scheduled showers. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #77) out of 1 Resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) during the re-certification survey. The findings include: According to the National Institute of Health (NIH) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) are basic routine tasks that most healthy individuals can perform without assistance. These activities include personal care tasks such as eating, dressing, bathing, toileting, managing continence, and transferring (moving from 1 position to another). The ability to perform activities of daily living is an essential measure of an individual's functional status. The inability to perform basic activities of daily living may lead to unsafe conditions and a poor quality of life. The healthcare team should be aware of the importance of assessing activities of daily living in patients to help identify those who require assistance, whether for temporary rehabilitation or long-term care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to 1. provide a Resident with safe transfer from chair to bed and 2. ensure a Resident was free from an accident. This was found to be evident for 2 (Residents #59 and #146) out of 3 Residents reviewed for accidents during the re-certification survey. The findings include: 1. On 6/30/25 at 8:06 AM a review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) MD00178278 revealed a report of a fall to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). The report advised that Resident #146 complained that during incontinent care the Resident fell off the bed. During review of the investigation file conducted on 6/30/25 at 8:17 AM, this surveyor reviewed the statement from Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA)#8. In the statement the GNA reported that around 5 am on 5/18/22, while changing Resident #146, the Resident rolled toward me but was sliding off the bed. I quickly grabbed him/her upper body that was leaning toward the floor and guided the Resident to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement nonpharmacological interventions of pain and ensure that pain medication was given consistent with the professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #59) of 3 residents reviewed for pain management during the recertification survey. The findings include: The medical abbreviation PRN stands for pro re nata, a Latin phrase that translates to as needed or as the situation arises. Nonpharmacological interventions are treatments that manage pain without the use of medication. These interventions may include but are not limited to massage, music therapy, aromatherapy, applying mild heat or cold packs and repositioning. Oxycodone is a strong painkiller from a group of medicines called opiates, or narcotics used to treat moderate to severe pain. Pain parameters are the specific aspects of pain that are evaluated during an interview to understand a person's pain experience. On 6/18/25 at 7:18 AM, a review of Resident #59's active Physician's orders revealed the following: 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to provide ongoing activities to residents. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. This was found to be evident when multiple observations were made during the survey. The findings include: While conducting the facility's annual survey, multiple observations were made on the nursing unit as follows: On 5/18/22 at 12:14 PM an observation was made and there were no activities taking place. On 5/19/22 at 11:00 AM an observation was made and there were no activities taking place. On 5/24/22 at 1:00 PM an observation was made and there were no activities taking place. An interview was conducted with the Activity Assistant (AA), Staff # 17, on 5/24/22 at 11:48 AM and she was made aware that multiple observations were made and there were no activities taking place. She acknowledged that activities were not ongoing contributing this to being new to the facility. During a subsequent interview at 12:30 PM with Staff #7 provided a copy of the facility's activity calendar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation during tour of the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain and enhance the dignity of Resident #70, this occurred in 1 of 37 sampled residents. The findings include: On 5/18/22 at 10:00 am during tour of the facility this surveyor observed Resident #70 lying in bed near the door. The resident was uncovered and exposed. The privacy curtain was partially pulled back, Staff # 22, a GNA, was assisting the resident with morning care. Staff #22 was interviewed about the observation on 5/18/22 at 1:00 pm. She stated, I became busy helping the resident and forgot to pull the curtain around. On 5/19/22 at 9:30 am, surveyor #42782 interviewed Resident #70 was interviewed about the incident. According to the resident, s/he stated, I felt bad. when receiving care while exposed. The Director of Nursing (DON) was made aware of the observation on 5/18/22 at 10:30 am. She stated she would be speaking with Staff #22 regarding the observation.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with residents and staff it was determined the facility failed to: 1). Provide a resident with with the appropriate size adult brief (Resident #50), and 2). Ensure a resident's call bell was in reach when needed (Resident #56). This was found to be evident for 2 of 24 sampled for accommodation during the survey. The findings include: 1). While conducting an interview with Resident #50 on 5/18/22 at 11:38 AM, the resident told the surveyor that his/her adult briefs do not fit. The resident stated that brief size the facility provides does not fully cover him/her and it cannot be closed. The resident showed the package to the surveyor and the size on the package read, Large. The resident stated that s/he thought the brief size was extra-large, which explains why the briefs do not fit. The resident went on to say that the facility does not provide the appropriate size adult briefs and that s/he will have to purchase their own supply. During another interview with Resident #50 on 5/25/22 at 10:00 AM, the resident stated that s/he had to purchase several packs of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents' rooms were maintained in a homelike environment by conducting routine assessments of the resident room and completing repairs when needed. This was found to be evident while touring rooms #43, #45, #47, #48 and for Resident #187's the facility during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: 1). On 5/18/22 at 12:00 PM during a tour of residents rooms 40-1 through 48-2 were observed. There were multiple rooms noted to have large, spackled areas above the head of the bed in need of repair and paint. On 5/25/22 at 10:37 AM a tour of the unit was done with the Maintenance Director (MD), Staff #6, present. The Maintenance Director observed each of the rooms. room [ROOM NUMBER]-1: had a large, spackled area above the head of the bed. room [ROOM NUMBER]-2: had a large area with a hole in it above the head of the bed. room [ROOM NUMBER]: the was wallpaper was lifted behind…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-27 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined the facility staff failed to provide written notice for emergency transfers to the residents, the resident's representatives, and the ombudsman along with the reason for transfer. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 5 residents reviewed for a facility-initiated transfer during the investigative of the survey (Residents #67 and #87). The findings include: 1). A review of Resident #67's clinical record revealed on 1/23/21, the resident was sent to the hospital for treatment and evaluation. The review also revealed that the facility staff failed to provide written notice for emergency transfers to the residents, and or the residents' representative. The Administrator was informed of the regulatory concern on 5/25/22 at 10:30 AM, and no evidence of the notification was provided prior to exit. 2). A review of the medical record for Resident #87 on 5/24/22 at 10:00 am revealed Resident #87 was transferred to the hospital on 7/6/21. The continued review of the medical record did not reveal evidence that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-27 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident or resident representative in writing of the facility's bed-hold policy upon transfer of a resident to an acute care facility. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed during the annual survey (Resident # 87). The findings include: A review of Resident #87's medical record on 5/24/22 at 10:00 am revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on 7/6/21. A continued review of the medical record did not reveal evidence that the resident or resident's responsible party was notified in writing of the behold policy. During an interview of the Administrator on 5/24/22 1:00 pm he stated the written notification of the bed hold policy could not be located.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews it was determined the facility failed to: 1). Have a quarterly care plan meeting for Resident #2; 2). Update Resident #2's care plan; and 3). Follow Resident #79's care plan interventions for rendering care when the resident is resistive services. This was evident for 3 of 24 residents sampled during the survey. The findings include: 1). On 05/26/22 at 9:44 am a review of the resident's electronic medical record revealed the last care plan meeting was held on 1/22/22. On 05/26/22 at 10:30 am the surveyor spoke with Staff #2, the Director of Nursing (DON), about the timing of the resident's last documented care plan meeting. On 05/26/22 at 3:11 pm, Staff #2, the DON, provided a list of care plan meetings held for the resident. The dates were documented as 02/18/21, 07/08/21, 10/24/21, and 01/22/22. There was no record of a care plan meeting between February 2021 and July 2021. There was no evidence of a meeting after January 2022. According to the list provided by the DON, the next scheduled care plan meeting for the resident is 06/02/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for 6 out of 37 residents sampled for record review during the survey (#4, 42, #43, #81, #137, and #187). The findings include: 1). A suprapubic catheter is a surgically created connection between the urinary bladder and the skin used to drain urine from the bladder in individuals with obstruction of normal urinary flow. On 5/24/22 at 10:00 an interview was completed with Resident #4's responsible party (RP). According to the RP, Resident #4 was sent to the emergency room) twice because the resident suprapubic catheter was not flushed. The resident's RP stated, I told the nurse his/her catheter was not being flushed; however, nothing was done. During observation on 5/24/22 at 11:30 am Resident #4 was noted lying in bed with his/her Foley bag covered by a pillowcase hanging on the left side of the bed. On 5/24/22 at 12:00 pm during an interview, Staff #14, a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA), stated the pillowcase…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-27 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide treatment/services to maintain Resident #11's vision. This is evident for 1 out of 2 residents selected for review during the investigation stage of the survey process. The findings include: During an interview with Resident #11 on 5/19/22 at 10:00 AM, the resident stated he/she is waiting for an appointment with the eye doctor. The resident stated I can't see; my glasses were broken in October 2021, and I need a new pair. On 5/23/22 at 11:30 AM the review of Resident #11's record revealed that the Ophthalmologist saw the resident on 11/1/21 and noted that the current glasses were broken beyond repair and Resident #11 requested replacement. Further review of the medical record did not reveal evidence that the facility placed an order for the resident's glasses. An interview with the Administrator on 5/25/22 at 9:18 AM confirmed Resident #11's glasses were not ordered prior to 05/23/22.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide supervision to prevent an accident (Resident #56). This was evident for 1 out of 19 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: During an interview with Resident #56 on 5/18/2022 at 8:25 am, the resident reported a fall incident that morning which was witnessed by facility staff. The surveyor reported the fall incident to the Administrator at 5/18/2022 at 10:00 am. An interview was conducted with the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/18/2022 at 12:30 pm. The DON revealed that facility staff reported that Resident #56's fall incident occurred at approximately 5:30 am that morning and there was no mention of injuries or pain when the resident was assessed. The DON interviewed Resident #56, after the surveyor reported the fall incident, and the resident reported having right shoulder pain and no other injuries. The Administrator revealed that the facility would investigate to determine the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview during the initial tour of the facility kitchen it was determined that the facility staff, failed to store, food under sanitary conditions. The findings include: On 5/19/22 10:33 am, during the initial tour and observation of the facility kitchen with the Dietary [NAME] staff #23, it was found that: 1. The dry storage room door was propped open, and two dietary aides', Staff #24 and Staff #25 were in the dry storage room labeling food. A box of relish packets was noted on the floor. 2. The storage room floor was dirty. 3. The storage room walls had chipped paint. 4. Observation was made of the stand-up refrigerator near the kitchen stove. In the refrigerator were an unlabeled 1/2 sandwiches that were in a plastic bag and a drink that was opened and unlabeled. Staff #23 stated the items belonged to a dietary aide who worked on 5/18/21. After surveyor intervention the items were discarded. 5. The 3-compartment sink had no test strips. On Staff #23 stated the Food Service Director, Staff #26 had the additional strips locked up and he would be in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for its residents that access entrance units, in the therapy room, and when storing resident's urinals. This deficient practice affects all residents in the facility. The findings include: 1). On 5/18/2022 at 8:10 am, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed dirty floors and debris at the entrance of the unit for the A and B halls. The surveyor also observed a soiled medication cart and a broken bed in the hall of Unit A. The surveyor expressed concerns to the Administrator and Director of Nursing on 5/24/2022 at 1:50 pm. 2). On 5/18/2022 at 8:30 am, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed facility staff member hanging clean urinals on the lip of the trash can in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 05/18/2022 at 8:31 am, the surveyor interviewed Resident #41 and Resident #45 about the facility staff's storage of clean urinals. Both residents revealed that it was normal for facility staff members to hang clean…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-10-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to 1. ensure that a copy of the resident's Maryland Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) and the medical ineffectiveness forms match. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 42 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for Advance Directives 2. ensure that the residents current code status matched the MOLST and the computer orders and ensure an effective system in place to ensure a resident's code status was communicated to nursing staff providing care. This was evident for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #23 and #28) in the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: 1. On [DATE] Resident #32's medical records were reviewed. The review revealed that resident was admitted to the facility in [DATE] for rehabilitation and for long term care and with diagnoses that included Anoxic Brain Damage (injury to the brain due to a lack of oxygen), muscle weakness and stroke. Review of the Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-10-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, interview with residents, facility staff and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to keep residents free from abuse related to the fear that a known wandering resident had the potential to inflict abuse (verbal, physical or sexual) secondary to his/her mental status on residents that were dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. This was evident for 1 resident identified during an abuse allegation (Resident #23). The findings include: During the initial screening process Resident #77 was interviewed on 10/11/18 at 9:03 AM. S/he had no concerns with the facility and as the interview was ending s/he stated, the facility does have one problem, it's the wanderers. S/he further stated that, two men come in, they stand by the night stand and one by the door. The resident was asked if s/he has ever been touched and s/he stated no. S/he further stated that during the resident council meeting on 10/9/18, this concern was brought up and the facility put up stop signs at the door, but s/he doesn't feel like that will stop the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-10-16 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on on medical record review, interview and review of recent facility discharge practices, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents and/or their representative (RP) with the proper paper documentation of the facility's bed-hold policy when a discharge to the hospital occurred, and failed to ensure correct information was shared when contact was made regarding the bed-hold policy. This was evident for 3 of 3 resident records reviewed (Resident #53, #241, #28) regarding planned and unplanned hospitalizations. The findings include: 1. Review on 10/15/18 at 9:51 PM, of the unplanned hospitalization of Resident #53 on: 2/14-2/17, 7/11-7/15 and 7/30-8/11, revealed that the facility failed to provide the resident or RP with a copy of the bed-hold policy upon transfer/admission to the hospital for any of the hospitalizations. 2. Review on 10/12/18 at 9:29 AM of Resident #241's hospitalization on 9/28/18 revealed that the resident and or RP was not given a copy of the facility bed-hold policy. 3. Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-10-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that describes the resident's 1. psychosocial needs and preference and how the facility will assist in meeting these needs and preferences, 2. wandering tendencies, 3. the use of side rails, 4. a restorative nursing plan including the use of a splint; 5. the treating of diabetes with diet only. This was evident for 4 out of 42 residents (Resident #42, #23, #77, and #28) reviewed during the investigation stage of the long-term care survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1. On 10/12/18 Resident #42's medical records and care plans were reviewed. This review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in 2014 for long term care and with diagnosis which includes cerebrovascular accident or stroke (the sudden death of some brain cells due to lack of oxygen when the blood flow to the brain is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-16 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident with dignity and respect by improperly transporting a resident down the hall. This was evident during a random observation. The findings include: During tour of the facility on 10/15/18 at 1:08 PM Surveyor observed GNA staff # 13 pulling Resident #67 backwards down the hall. Resident #67 was positioned in a Geri chair (medical clinical style recliner). Staff #13 was observed walking forward with her arm extended backwards pulling the Geri chair down the main hallway and turned onto Hallway A wing. Resident #67 could not be observed from the staff's position and was not checked on by the staff during this observation. Staff #13 was asked by the surveyor if she knew this was a dignity concern and she stated no, but thank you for telling me. The Director of Nursing and the Unit Manger of the A wing were notified at 1:11 PM of the concern and the observation.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-16 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with residents and facility staff it was determined the facility failed to give adequate responses to grievances that were presented by the resident council. This was found to be evident during a resident council meeting that was conducted during the facility's annual survey. The findings include: The survey team conducted a resident council meeting on 10/12/18 at 11:08 AM with the following residents in attendance: Resident #46, Resident #36, Resident #11, Resident #12 and Resident #74. The residents expressed the following concerns: One of the residents reported that a resident who uses a CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) machine, requested assistance with putting it on and was told by staff that it is almost morning and that s/he probably did not need to have it on. The CPAP machine is used to help a person with sleep apnea breathe more easily during sleep. The resident said the staff did put the mask on but did not have to make that comment. Another resident stated that recently, s/he put the call light on because they wanted Tylenol and it took 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-16 · tag F0577 — isolated
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with residents it was determined the facility failed to have survey results accessible to residents and a sign posted identifying where the survey results are located. This was found to be evident during a resident council meeting and during an observation of the facility during the facility's annual survey. The findings include: The survey team conducted a resident council meeting on 10/12/18 at 11:08 AM with the following residents in attendance: Resident #46, Resident 36, Resident #11, Resident #12 and Resident #74. The question was asked are the results of the state inspection available to read, and the residents responded by saying, we don't know where we can find the results. During an observation on 10/12/18 at 1:00 PM the state survey book was on the bottom of a table located in the front lobby. There was no sign posted identifying the state survey results location. In a meeting with the Nursing Home Administrator on 10/12/18 at 1:30 PM, s/he acknowledged that there was no sign posted and stated that the facility will post a sign in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical records review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the physician that the resident blood test to measure the effectiveness of medication was hemolyzed. This was true for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #89) reviewed during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include, On 10/16/18 Resident #89's medical records were reviewed. This review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in September for rehabilitation and with diagnosis that includes Venous thrombosis and embolism transient ischemia attack (TIA). A venous thrombus is a blood clot (thrombus) that forms within a vein. An embolism obstruction of an artery, typically by a clot of blood or an air bubble. A TIA is a temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain. Review of the physician orders reveal an order for Coumadin (medication to keep the blood thin). The dose of coumadin is determined by the resident Prothrombin Time and International Normalized Ratio (PT/INR). The goal is to keep the INR greater than 2 and less than 3. The international…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-16 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that the resident and/or resident's representative were notified in writing of the resident's transfer and the rationale for the transfer. This was found to be evident for 3 of the 3 residents (Resident #53, #241 and #28) reviewed for hospitalization during the investigative portion of the survey. The finding includes: 1. Interview with Resident #53 on 10/10/18 at 10:09 AM revealed that s/he was hospitalized for approximately a month and a half but not sure how long ago. A review of Resident #53's medical record revealed diagnoses including seizures, chronic kidney disease, legal blindness, cognitive communication deficit and history of falls. Further review of Resident #53's electronic and paper medical record on 10/15/18 at 9:51 AM revealed hospitalizations on: 2/14-2/17, 7/11-7/15 and 7/30-8/11. Review of the medical record failed to reveal any documentation that the resident or the responsible party had been provided with a written notification…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-16 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with the facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the resident's status as evidenced by: 1) failing to assess the resident functional status and 2) failing to accurately assess a residents wandering status. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 42 residents (Resident #42 and #23) reviewed during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. 1. On 10/12/18 Resident #42's medical records were reviewed. This review revealed that the resident was admitted in August 2014 for long term care and with diagnoses which includes Rheumatoid arthritis, Chronic Obstruction Pulmonary Disease and Renal disease. Review of the Comprehensive assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with the facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the resident's status as evidenced by: 1) failure to accurately assess antidepressant use and 2) failure to assess the resident functional status This was evident for 2 out of 46 records (Resident #42 and #32) reviewed during the investigation stage of the survey The Findings include: The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. 1. Resident #32 quarterly MDS was reviewed on 10/15/2018. This review revealed a quarterly MDS assessment completed on September 1, 2018. Review of section N medication usage revealed that the facility coded antidepressant uses for 0 days indicating the resident did not receive antidepressants. Review of the medication administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, interview and observation it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure restorative nursing services were put in place after the resident was discharged from therapy. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 3 residents (Resident #28 and #65) reviewed for activities of daily living during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1) On 10/11/18 review of Resident #28's medical record revealed the resident had resided at the facility for several years and whose diagnosis included heart disease, diabetes and dementia. The resident also has left sided hemiparesis (weakness or partial loss of movement). On 10/15/18 review of the medical record revealed an order, dated 8/23/18, for the following: OT (occupational therapy) Clarification: D/C (discharge) from skilled OT with restorative nursing for orthotic management. This physician order had been initiated by Occupational Therapist (OT) #11. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal any documentation regarding the specifics of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to administer medication as ordered by the physician. This was evident during the review of 1 of 5 (Resident #77) records reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Review of the medical record on 10/15/18 at 9:30 AM for Resident #77 revealed diagnosis including chronic pain. In addition there was a physician order for morphine sulfate 15 mg twice a day secondary to a compression fracture. Further review of Resident #77's medical record revealed on 10/12 and 10/13/18 at 8:00 PM the scheduled morphine dose was documented as a '9' on the medication administration record (MAR). According to the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) when interviewed on 10/15/18 at 5:49 PM the '9' means not given. On 10/12/18 an as needed dose of Oxycodone was administered to Resident #77 at 8 PM and on 10/13/18 an as needed dose of Oxycodone was given at 7:00 PM. Throughout the month of October the Oxycodone was only given in the morning except on 10/12/18 and 10/13/18. No where in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-16 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical records review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to provide follow-up care for a resident regarding hearing impairments. This was evident for 1 out of 1 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for hearing during the investigation stage of the survey The findings include: On 10/15/18 Resident #21's medical records were reviewed. This review revealed that in March 2018 the resident had an audiology consult. This consult revealed that the resident needed wax removed from both ears. The consult further revealed that the resident should not be scheduled for a follow up appointment until the resident has seen an ears, nose and throat (ENT) specialist and after the ears are clean the resident can reschedule for an evaluation. During an interview with the unit manage on 10/15/18 the surveyor asked what the process after the resident has been seen by the specialist and they make recommendation. She revealed that after the recommendations are made, either she or the unit managers will call the attending physician and arrange a follow-up. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, interview and observation it was determined that the facility failed to adequately assess and implement interventions related to a resident with known wandering tendencies. This was evident for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #23) identified for wandering. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #23 on 10/11/18 at 11:00 AM, including nursing notes revealed diagnoses including Parkinson disease and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances. Nursing notes throughout the resident's stay documented wandering behavior with intrusion on other residents' rooms from June 2018 to October 2018. Nursing notes also documented attempts at redirecting the resident that were not always effective. Resident #23 was observed on 10/11/18 at 12:12 PM entering another resident's room and being redirected by his/her roommate. There were no staff around at this time during this observation. A review of the resident #23's care plans on 10/15/18 at 11:52 AM revealed a failure to include wandering and possible interventions related to the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-16 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and medical record review it was determined that the facility failed to assess and implement bed rails when ordered for a resident with repeated falls. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #53) reviewed for bed rails. The findings include: During an interview with Resident #53 on 10/10/18 at 10:10 AM s/he revealed to the surveyor that s/he is always falling and they are getting me a set of 'bars' to put here (pointed to the side of the bed) so I will hit them and know when to stop. I have fallen about 4 times, had a blackened eye, hit my forehead and had a big knot on my head from the bed side table. A review of Resident #53's medical record on 10/15/18 at 8:51 AM revealed diagnoses to include: generalized muscle weakness, seizures, history of traumatic brain injury and legal blindness. Further review of the resident's medical record revealed a fall occurring on 9/22/18 where Resident #53 fell out of bed and hit the bed side table. Another fall on 9/28/18 occurred and resident was found sitting on the floor with no injuries. A physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure pain medication ordered to be given as needed was only administered when indicated. This was found to be evident for 1 out of the 6 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for unnecessary medications during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: On 10/12/18 review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident had resided at the facility for more than a year and whose diagnosis include: diabetes, high blood pressure and high cholesterol. The resident's current orders for as needed pain medication included the following: Oxycodone 5 mg give one tablet every 6 hours as needed for pain and Tylenol 325 mg give two tablets by mouth every 6 hours for pain. No documentation was found in the orders regarding when the oxycodone was indicated verses when Tylenol was indicated. Oxycodone is an opiate medication used to treat pain. Review of the Medication Administration Record for the as needed pain medications revealed an area for the nurse to document the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs as evidenced by: 1) failure to provide adequate indication for the administration of psychotropic medications. This was evident for 1 out of 3 (Resident #32) residents reviewed during the investigation stage of the long-term care survey. The findings include: On 10/15/18 Resident #32's medical records were reviewed. This review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in January 2017 for rehabilitation and long-term care and with diagnosis that include Bipolar without psychotic features. Review of the medical records revealed that in January 2017 the resident was started on Seroquel 50 milligram every night. Review of the corresponding note revealed staff reported the resident had been stable will continue the resident on Seroquel 50 milligram. April 2017: the resident's dose of Seroquel was increased to 75 milligram the psychiatry note revealed the following; resident denies feeling depressed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to date medications upon opening them and discard expired medications. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 3 medication carts reviewed during the facility's annual survey. The findings include: An observation was conducted on 10/10/18 at 9:30 AM of three of the facility's medication carts and the following concerns were identified: In medication cart #1, there was a bottle of Systane Balance Lubricant eye drops for Resident #49 that was not dated when opened. There was a bottle of Artificial Tears Solution for Resident #27 with a date on the bottle that read, opened 4/1/18. The medication was to be discarded after 30 days of opening it. The nurse, Staff #16 was interviewed on 10/10/18 at 10:35 AM and stated that the medications were brought over with the resident when s/he was transferred to the unit. There was also a bottle of Xalatan 0.005% eye drops for Resident #17 that was not dated when opened. In medication cart # 3 there was a bottle of Refresh Liquigel Solution 1% that was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with professional standards as evidenced by failure to ensure primary care physician notes were printed and kept in the medical record for review by other health care providers. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 42 residents (Resident #28) reviewed during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: On 10/11/18 review of Resident #28's medical record revealed the resident had resided at the facility for several years and whose diagnoses included heart disease, diabetes and dementia. On 10/15/18 review of Resident #28's medical record, including the electronic health record and the paper chart, failed to reveal any primary care physician notes for 2018. On 10/15/18 at 3:41 PM surveyor informed the Director of Nursing (DON) that no primary care physician notes could be found for this resident. At this time surveyor also addressed a concern regarding diabetes management and blood sugar monitoring that occurred in April…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure newly admitted residents, with signed consents, received the flu vaccination. This was found to be evident 1 out of 5 residents (Resident #296) reviewed for immunizations during survey. The findings include: On 10/16/18 review of Resident #296's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in October 2018. The resident's responsible family member signed the Consent for Immunization of Influenza on 10/3/18. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal any documentation that the resident received the flu vaccine since admission to the facility. On 10/16/18 at 1:03 PM the Assistant Director of Nursing #2 reported that the flu vaccine is usually given when the consent is obtained and stated: don't know how (his/hers)got overlooked. She went on to report that they have put in for the resident to receive the immunization today, 10/16/18. The concern regarding the failure to administer the flu vaccine when consent was obtained was reviewed with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2018-10-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff reported environmental concerns to the maintenance department for repair. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 2 units in the facility. The findings include: On 10/10/18 at 1:45 PM Resident #50's wheelchair was observed and both armrests were noted to cracked/not intact. On 10/11/18 in room [ROOM NUMBER] at least four floor tiles near the A bed were noted to be in disrepair. In the bathroom the area behind the sink was observed to have a wooden board approximately 10 inches by 12 inches by 0.5 inches covering the area where the sink meets the wall. The area under the sink where the pipes go into the wall was not fully sealed. On 10/11/18 in room [ROOM NUMBER] the area of the wall behind the B bed was noted to be in need of repair, and an area of wallpaper of approximately 5 inches by 8 inches was observed to be missing from this area of the wall as well. On 10/16/18 between 3:40 PM and 4:04 PM the above…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SECOND OPTION OP CO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/19/2008
OPTION HOLDINGS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 04/19/2008
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
STOLTZ, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/19/2008
WILHEIM, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/19/2008
HOWARD MGMT CO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
GROVES, DONNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
RIZQUI, IBRAHIMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/10/2025
WYLIE, DEVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/05/2024
ODENTHAL, RICHARDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/12/2025
C R STOLTZ II LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
C.R. STOLTZ IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
HC REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
I. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
OMG RE HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
R.S. WILHEIM IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
RONALD S WILHEIM 2012 SPOUSAL TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
RRW, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
S.L. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008
WILHEIM FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2008

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 20%Other / private 13%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$373per resident / day
operating cost
$11,353per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$383per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215138. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next