Chamberlin Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 162 beds and averages 154.2 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, served, and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility except for one resident that the facility identified with an order for nothing by mouth. The facility census was 157 residents. Findings include: 1.Observation of dry storage on 05/11/26 at 9:39 A.M. revealed the following open and undated items: open bags of gravy mix, spaghetti noodles, macaroni noodles, two containers of peanut butter Interview 5/11/26 at 9:40 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #250 verified the open and undated items. 2. Observation on 05/11/26 at 9:46 A.M. revealed there was an open container of mashed potato mix without a lid being stored on top of the steamer. Interview on 05/11/26 at 9:46 A.M.with DM #250 verifed that the mashed potato mix should be covered when stored. 3. Observation on 05/11/26 at 9:47 A.M. revealed a bowl of hard boiled eggs was being stored at room temperature on top of the steamer. Interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure privacy and dignity during medication administration. This affected one (Resident #138) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 157 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #138 revealed an admission date of 10/09/14 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, aphasia following unspecified cerebrovascular disease, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #138 dated 05/03/26 revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the physician's orders for Resident #138 revealed an order dated 05/09/26 Lantus insulin 15 units per subcutaneous injection every morning and at bedtime for diabetes. Observation on 5/12/26 at 8:51 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #149 administered a Lantus insulin injection to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, resident interview, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to serve palatable meals at the preferred temperature. This affected one (Resident #9) and had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident with orders for nothing by mouth. The facility census was 157 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 10/05/24 with a diagnosis of degeneration of nervous system due to alcohol. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment for Resident #9 dated 02/28/26 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Interview on 05/11/26 at 2:03 P.M. with Resident #9 confirmed the food was served cold and did not taste good. Observation 05/13/26 at 2:28 P.M. of the test tray revealed the mashed potatoes were 109 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the roast beef was 99 degrees F. The potatoes were bland in flavor and the roast beef was cold. Interview on 05/13/26 at 2:29 P.M. with the Dietary Manager (DM) verified the potatoes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed. This affected one (Resident #8) of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 157 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 09/23/24 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, bipolar disease, chronic kidney disease, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. Review of the care plan for Resident #8 dated 10/09/24 revealed the resident requires EBP for indwelling catheter. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #8 dated 02/26/26 revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the physician's orders for Resident #8 revealed an order dated 04/22/26 for EBP related to the presence of an indwelling catheter. Observation of Resident #8's room on 05/13/26 at 8:43 A.M. revealed there was no EBP sign on the resident's door nor was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's code status matched in the hard (paper) and electronic chart. This affected two (#76 and #139) residents of 34 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 146. Findings include: Review of the Resident #76's chart revealed Resident #76 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, weakness, repeated falls, gastrostomy status, and hypothyroidism. Review of Resident #76's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident's cognition was not assessed and Resident #76 required maximal assistance with upper body dressing, rolling left and right, sitting to lying, lying to sitting, sitting to standing, chair transfers, and walking ten feet. Resident #76 was dependent with oral hygiene,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, nursing home bill of rights review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a clean and home like environment. This affected three (#22, #70, and #446) of 29 residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 146. Findings Included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 04/21/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and psychosis not due to a substance or physiological condition. Review of MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #22 required supervision for eating. Resident #22 was dependent for oral hygiene, toileting, dressing upper and lower clothing, personal hygiene, bathing, and transfers. Review of plan of care dated 05/22/24 revealed resident was at risk for falls and to apply the Dycem to wheelchair, assess risk for falls on admission, bed in lowest…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to correctly code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for the proper discharge location. This affected one (#144) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The census was 146. Findings include: Review of Resident #144's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/16/24 and discharge date of 05/03/24, with diagnoses including: cellulitis of right lower leg, schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #144 was cognitively intact and required assistance for mobility, she was having hallucinations and delusions, and verbal behaviors. Review of care plan revealed a discharge plan to home or another facility. Review of progress note date 05/03/24 at 12:44 P.M., revealed Resident #144 signed out of facility against medical advice (AMA), it was explained to resident that by leaving against advice she cannot take medications with her and she releases the facility from all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for a resident with vision impairment. This affected one (#52) of 29 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 146. Findings include: Review of the Resident #52's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/17/23, with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, pure hypercholesterolemia, anxiety disorder, spinal stenosis, other intervertebral disc degeneration lumbar region, obsession compulsive disorder, depression, other chronic pain, insomnia, hypertension, chronic pain and tobacco use. Review of Resident #52's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be cognitively intact and Resident #52 required supervision with eating, oral hygiene, toileting, personal hygiene, lying to sitting, sitting to standing, chair transfers, toilet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated timely with fall interventions. This affected one (#139) of five residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 146. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #139 revealed an admission date of 05/03/24. Diagnoses included dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, hyperlipidemia, chronic atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, anemia, major depressive disorder, chronic kidney disease, aphasia, and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. Review of the facility assessment titled Fall Risk Observation Tool, dated 05/11/24, revealed Resident #139 was at risk for falls. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #139 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #139 was assessed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of policies, the facility failed to provide safe storage for cigarettes and alcohol. This affected one (#128) of one resident reviewed for smoking. The facility failed to provide care planned fall interventions for residents at risk for falls. This affected two (#22, #103) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 146. Findings included: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date 04/21/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and psychosis not due to a substance or physiological condition. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 was assessed as having severe cognitive impairment. Resident #22 required supervision for eating. Resident #22 was dependent for oral hygiene, toileting, dressing upper and lower clothing, personal hygiene, bathing, and transfers. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH