No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Kenwood Terrace Healthcare Center

7450 Keller Road, Cincinnati, OH 45243 · For profit - Corporation · 132 certified beds · (513) 793-2255 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2019Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2019
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8240 Northcreek Dr #2000 · (513) 246-7000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8044 Montgomery Rd · (513) 793-3555 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5901 E Galbraith Rd · (513) 699-7710 · Call to confirm hours
Park
French Park Amberly Village · (513) 919-6738 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.8%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.8%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms68.7%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.2%6.1%16.1%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.5%25.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.4%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.4%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.5%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine45.8%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.4%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.6%12.9%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.4%CMS range 31.9–57.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 6.4–13.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.291.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.49
RN hours/ resident / day
1.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.92
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.51
RN hoursweekends
52.3%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 99.7 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-13)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2022-05-03)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2019-04-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of staff time card punches, observations, review of the facility abuse policy, and interviews with staff, residents, and a police detective, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy when one State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) neglected to report that he had dropped a resident during an improper transfer, and one additional STNA who was aware the resident had been dropped also neglected to report the incident. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening injuries when Resident #40 experienced increased pain and suffering due to the delayed identification of the extent of the injuries sustained by the resident during the improper transfer. Resident #40 was then transferred to the emergency room of a local hospital where she was found to have acute fractures to both the left and right distal femurs, and remote right pubic rami fractures. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital documentation, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of facility investigations, review of written statements, observations, staff, resident, detective and ambulette personnel interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and/or assistance for each resident to ensure their safety. This resulted in actual harm to two residents (#40, #29) who both sustained multiple fractures when being transferred. Resident #40 sustained bilateral distal femur fractures when transferred from bed to a shower chair without appropriate assistance and Resident #29 sustained multiple rib fractures while being transferred off an ambulette without adequate supervision at the entrance to the facility. This affected two (#40 and #29) out of five residents were reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, observations and policy review, the facility failed to investigate the allegation of missing dentures. This affected one Resident (#35) of three reviewed for dental appliances. The facility census was 87. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a subdural hemorrhage affecting the right side, type two diabetes mellitus and congestive obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #35 revealed an order dated 09/22/23 for the resident to receive dental services. Review of the care plan for Resident #35 dated 11/06/23 and updated on 03/27/25 revealed resident was at risk for altered nutritional states related to dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), need for pureed diet, hospice care, and was edentulous with dentures. Interventions included the following: ensure dentures were utilized for meals, monitor meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospice documentation, staff interview, hospice staff interview, review of the contract between the hospice provider and the facility, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure collaboration between the hospice provider and the facility was documented in the medical record. Additionally, the facility failed to retain copies of hospice provider progress notes at the facility. This affected two (Residents #35 and #7) of three residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 87 residents. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 09/22/23 with diagnoses including hypertension, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a subdural hemorrhage affecting the right side, type two diabetes mellitus and congestive obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the facility plan of care for Resident #35 dated 09/28/23 and revised on 07/25/25 revealed resident had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and review of facility water temperatures, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable hot water supply to ensure a comfortable environment. This affected four (#33, #34, #43 and #52) out of four residents review for hot water temperatures and had the potential to affect 59 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58 and #59) residents residing on the 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 and part of the 600 hallway. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Observation of random hot water faucet temperatures on 06/20/25 at 9:30 A.M. revealed the following temperatures: empty resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was 95 degrees F (F), empty resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was 97 degrees F, Resident #33 and #34's room was 99 degrees F, Resident #43's room was 102…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on closed medical record review, observations, mechanical lift users manual, and interviews, the facility failed to properly maintain and inspect mechanical lifts to prevent injuries for residents being transported. This affected one resident (Resident #46) out of four reviewed that required the use of mechanical lifts. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 05/16/24. Diagnoses included cardiomegaly, congestive heart failure, dysphagia, morbid obesity, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, gout, peripheral vascular disease, osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, chronic venous ulcers, low back pain, and cervical stenosis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/14/25, revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, ambulation. Review of physician orders revealed this resident was to be a two-person mechanical lift for all transfers, bathing, and incontinence. Review of the nurses notes dated 04/30/25 at 5:01…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a safe manner and failed to ensure kitchen equipment was kept in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 82 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Observation on 02/10/25 at 6:45 P.M. of the facility kitchen revealed the walk-in refrigerator contained marinara sauce and two whipped toppings without expiration dates. The freezer had opened cauliflower without an expiration date. Observation of the pantry revealed open raisin bran, toasted oats, marshmallows, and cornbread without an expiration date. On the spice shelf above the preparation station was a container of oregano with an expiration date of 09/28/23. Observation of the kitchen dry storage area on 02/10/25 at 6:50 P.M. revealed cans of mandarin oranges and pumpkin that were severely dented and placed on the shelf indicated for facility use. Further observation at 7:01 P.M. revealed a large amount of debris with a strong odor in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to promote and honor a resident's choice for bathing. This affected one (#21) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, thrombocytopenia purpura, chronic kidney disease stage II, hypertension, chronic pain syndrome, osteoarthritis, diverticulosis, gastro-esophageal reflux, vascular dementia, hyperlipidemia, and visual disturbance. Review of Resident #21's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] and the annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the choice of bathing options was very important to the resident. Review of the most recent MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #21's shower sheets for December 2024, January 2025, and February 2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in a timely manner. This affected two (#63 and #82) of three residents reviewed for resident assessments. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to home on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, urinary tract infections, malignant neoplasm of the larynx, pulmonary insufficiency, acute kidney failure, protein-calorie malnutrition, gastronomy, adult failure to thrive, dysphagia, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #63 had intact cognition with no behavior symptoms. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #63 discharged from the facility on 10/09/24 to home with proper discharge. Further review revealed a discharge MDS assessment was not completed and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were held as required for residents and their representatives. This affected two (#12 and #38) of three residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of end stage renal disease (ESRD) with dependence on hemodialysis, diabetes mellitus type II, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with left (dominate) side hemiplegia/hemiparesis, congestive heart failure (CHF), and dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 had no cognitive impairment and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident required set up assistance for eating, maximal assistance for oral hygiene and bed mobility, and was dependent for personal hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing and transfers. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were administered antipsychotic medications for appropriate indications. This affected two (#84 and #241) of the five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #241 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease, gout, and anemia. There were no diagnoses with indications for use of an antipsychotic medication in the medical record. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/06/24, revealed Resident #241 was assessed to have intact cognition. Review of the active physicians order dated 01/27/25 revealed Resident #241 was to be administered 25 milligrams (mg) of Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) once a day in the mornings. There were no indication for the use of the medication present. Interview with Divisional Director of Clinical Operations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of a facility policy, the facility failed to a physician was notified promptly of a critical laboratory value. This affected one (#16) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/22/23 with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type II with diabetic polyneuropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (acute) with lower respiratory infection, and muscle weakness (generalized). Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/04/2024, revealed Resident #16 had moderate impairment in cognition. Review of a Telehealth notification note dated 07/15/24 (6:00 P.M.) revealed Resident #16 felt lightheaded and dizzy after going out to smoke. The resident's vital signs and blood sugar were checked at that time. Orders were placed to obtain a complete blood count (CBC) and comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) laboratory work. The laboratory work was completed on 07/16/24 at 7:46 A.M. and results were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with prompt and appropriate dental services upon the discovery of a resident with missing dentures. This affected one (#62) of six residents reviewed for personal property. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizoaffective bipolar disorder, depression, dysphagia, extrapyramidal and movement disorder, cognitive communication disorder, difficult ambulation, muscle weakness, dementia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 had minimal cognitive impairments with no behavior symptoms. Review of Resident #62's medical record contained no item inventory list upon admission to determine if the resident had full set of dentures upon arrival to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, observation, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for pain management to include indwelling medical devices. This affected one (Resident #69) of ten residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, obesity, and non-pressure chronic ulcer of the let hell and mid-foot. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Review of the hospitals' After Visit Summary dated 05/21/24 revealed Resident #69 had a Past Surgical History including thoracic laminectomy with paddle lead and rechargeable battery in left hip performed 03/14/22. Review of the care plan dated 05/09/24 revealed Resident #69 had complaints…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in appropriate containers in the medication cart. This had the potential to affect three (Residents #59, #61, and #62) of three residents prescribed iron on the 500-Hall. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #59 had physician orders for ferrous sulfate 325 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice daily with meals for anemia. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #61 had physician orders for ferrous sulfate 325 mg by mouth in the morning with breakfast for anemia. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #62 had physician orders for ferrous sulfate 325 mg by mouth once daily with breakfast for anemia. Observation on 11/18/2024 at 10:17 A.M. revealed the 500-Hall medication cart had an unlabeled plastic medication cup containing multiple green round tablets. During an interview on 11/18/24 at 10:17 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #162 verified the cup full of green pills she identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff prepared food in a sanitary manner. This affected one (Resident #3) of one resident reviewed during tray line service. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Observation on 11/18/24 at 12:32 P.M. revealed Dietary Manager #142 touched two hamburger buns with bare hands during lunch meal preparation. During an interview on 11/18/24 at 12:55 P.M., Dietary Manager #142 verified she had used her bare hands to open hamburger buns while preparing Resident #3's lunch tray. Dietary Manager #142 acknowledged she was not supposed to touch food with her bare hands. Review of the policy titled Food Preparation dated 09/2017 revealed all staff used serving utensils appropriately to prevent cross contamination. This was an incidental finding discovered during the course of the complaint investigation.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection prevention procedures during medication administration. This affected two (Residents #63 and #79) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder and mixed hyperlipidemia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Resident #79 had physician's orders for routine morning medications including Amlodipine (treats high blood pressure) 10 milligrams (mg) by mouth once daily and Galantamine (treats dementia) eight mg by mouth once daily. Observation of medication administration on 11/18/24 at 9:36 A.M. revealed while preparing medications for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify residents of Medicaid account balances. This affected three residents (#28, #29 and #61) out of three residents reviewed for notification of Medicaid account balances. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #28 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, alcohol use, unspecified psychosis, diabetes mellitus type II and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 had intact cognition. Review of the Resident Fund Management Service (RFMS) Trial Balance report dated 10/03/24 revealed Resident #28 had a balance of $27,554.84. The current Supplemental Security Income (SSI) resource limit is $2,000.00. Interview on 10/03/24 at 2:20 P.M. with Resident #28 revealed he had not received a notification letter from the facility of being within $200 of the Social Security…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to properly investigate grievances and provide a summary of the findings to the resident or resident representative. This affected two residents (#55 and #8601) out of three residents reviewed for grievances. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #55 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, depression, anxiety, diabetes mellitus type II, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and tracheostomy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 had moderate cognitive impairment and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident required set- up assistance with eating and oral hygiene, maximal assistance with bed mobility and was dependent for toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene and transfers. Review of grievances/concerns revealed a concern was initiated on 09/30/24 by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were securely stored. This affected three (#56, #24 and #54) residents of three reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 06/01/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to schizoaffective disorder, major depression, personality and behavioral disorder due to known physiological condition. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed an intact cognition. Resident #56 requires supervision for eating, toileting, bed mobility and transfers. Review of the plan of care for Resident #56 dated 12/08/22 revealed resident uses psychotropic medication for diagnoses of schizophrenia. Interventions include aims testing, pharmacy consults, monitoring of adverse side effects, and consistent daily routines when possible. Review of the active physician orders for Resident #56 for July 2024 revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to accommodate resident food preferences. This affected one (#30) out of three residents reviewed for food preferences. The census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included mild persistent asthma with acute exacerbation, congestive heart failure, hypertension, chronic viral hepatitis c, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, gout, type two diabetes mellitus with other specified complication, hypokalemia, vitamin d deficiency, hypertensive urgency, chronic pain syndrome, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/20/24, revealed Resident #30 had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. This resident was assessed to require setup assistance for eating and oral hygiene, and moderate assistance for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed correctly. This affected one (#17) out of three residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 100. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 05/19/23. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular attack (CVA/stroke) with hemiplegia affecting left dominant side, renal insufficiency, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #17, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Her functional status was impairment of her upper and lower extremities, and she was independent for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the physician's orders dated 10/13/23 for Resident #17 revealed the resident ordered to have Metro Vaginal Gel one tube applied intravaginally at bedtime for bacterial vaginitis times six days. Review of the Medication Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure their pharmacy services provided resident's medication in a timely manner. This affected one (#17) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The census was 100. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 05/19/23. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular attack (CVA/stroke) with hemiplegia affecting left dominant side, renal insufficiency, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #17, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Her functional status was impairment of her upper and lower extremities, and she was independent for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the physician's orders dated 10/13/23 for Resident #17 revealed the resident ordered to have Metro Vaginal Gel one tube applied intravaginally at bedtime for bacterial vaginitis times six days. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services to perform them when Resident #4 did not receive showers twice a week. This affected one (Resident #4) of three residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Record review of Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 05/19/23 with pertinent diagnoses of: hemiplegia, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, history of malignant neoplasm of kidney, hypertension, chronic kidney disease stage three, chronic pain syndrome, osteoarthritis of left and right knee, pan due to internal orthopedic prosthetic devices, visual disturbance, hyperlipidemia, vascular dementia, acquired absence of kidney, pulmonary embolism, diverticulosis of the large intestine, and gastroesophagel reflux disease. Review of the 07/18/23 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required total dependence for transfer, toilet use, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure med error rate was less than 5% when Resident #55 and Resident #53 did not receive their medications as ordered. This affected two (Resident #53, and #55) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. There was 29 opportunities for error with five errors for a 17.24% error rate. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 07/08/21 with pertinent diagnoses of: unstable angina, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, depression, hypertension, and heart failure. Review of a physicians order dated 10/03/23 revealed dapagliflozin propanediol tablet 10 milligram (mg)s give 10 mg by mouth in the morning for diabetes. Observation of a medication pass for Resident #53 on 10/19/23 at 9:30 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #10 passing medications including amlodipine 10 mgs, aspirin 81 milligrams, coreg 25 mgs, eliquis 5 mgs, lasix 20 mgs, pantoprazole 40 mgs, pravastatin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, manufactures directions, and record review the facility failed to ensure they were free from significant medication errors when the nurse did not prime the insulin pen prior to administering the dosage to Resident #34. This affected one (Resident #34) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Record review of Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 11/12/22 with pertinent diagnoses of: encounter for orthopedic aftercare, diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease, hypertension, and heart failure. Review of the medical record revealed a physician order dated 08/30/23 for humalog sliding scale subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for diabetes mellitus. Give 150-199 =2 units, 200-249= 4 units, 250-299= 6 units, 300-349= 8 units. Observation on 10/23/23 at 11:45 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #20 administering humalog Kwikpen insulin 6 units for Resident #34 blood sugar of 280. LPN #20 did not prime the insulin pen with two units prior to administering the insulin.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and record review the facility failed to store medications appropriately when Resident #47 had medications in her room and Resident #55 had medications and multiple eye drops in her room. This affected two (Resident #47 and #55) of four reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident # 47 revealed an admission date of 10/09/23 with pertinent diagnoses of: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, malignant neoplasm, cerebral edema, atrial fibrillation, depression, and hypertension. Observation on 10/19/23 at 8:57 A.M. revealed there was a pill cup on her bedside table with three medications inside. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #15 on 10/19/23 at 9:00 A.M. verified the pills were Keppra (seizure medication) 500 milligrams (mgs) , eliquis (blood thinner) 5 mg, and depakote (seizure medication) 125 mgs, in the medicine cup on Resident #47 bedside table. LPN #15 stated the pills must of been given on another shift but not taken by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, blood glucose machine reference manual, and record review the facility failed to failed to follow infection control procedures when they did not appropriately clean the blood glucose machine after use for Resident #34. This affected one (Resident #34) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility identified five residents (Resident #1, #34, #46, #63, and #70) on the 600 hallway with blood sugar checks. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Record review of Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 11/12/22 with pertinent diagnoses of: encounter for orthopedic aftercare, diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease, hypertension, and heart failure. Observation on 10/23/23 at 11:40 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #20 checking the blood sugar of Resident #34 and it was 280 deciliter (d/L). LPN #20 went and administered the insulin and cleaned the glucometer with an alcohol pad. LPN #30 stated that was the proper way to clean it and verified there was no bleach wipes in the cart to appropriately clean…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen and acceptable food storage practices. This had the potential to affect 67 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Tour of kitchen on 04/25/22 at 6:35 P.M. revealed in the walk-in refrigerator, there was meat in a container, and vegetables in a container unlabeled and dated 04/03/22. There were tomatoes in a box with gray furry substance with the box dated 02/24/22. In the walk-in refrigerator and in the under counter refrigerator, there were nine unopened and one open half gallon carton of lactose free milk with expiration date of 04/20/22. There were 10 unlabeled and undated individual portioned wrapped pieces of meat in the undercounter refrigerator. Interview on 04/25/22 at 6:40 P.M. with [NAME] #230 verified the food should have been labeled and dated and expired food should have discarded. Observation on 04/26/22 at 12:30 P.M. with Dietary Manager #610 revealed Unit 400 clean utility room's ice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean comfortable and homelike environment. This affected four (Residents #2, #12, #21, and #52) of 18 residents reviewed for a homelike environment. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Interview and observation on 04/25/22 at 7:29 P.M. with Resident #2 reported there was a dark brown/black mold looking substance at the bottom of her toilet on the floor and her closet door was broken. Observations revealed Resident #2's closet door was broken and the bottom of the toilet had black looking substance around the base of toilet. Resident #2 stated the closet door and has been in disrepair for a long time. Interview and observations on 04/25/22 at 7:40 P.M. revealed Resident #52's bathroom light makes loud noises when turned on. The bathroom was positioned in front of his bed. Resident #52 reported the sound becomes a problem when his roommate gets up in the middle of the night and turns on the light. Resident #52 stated the issue has been reported. Observation and interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-03 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to offer a resident a choice in method of bathing. This affected three (Residents #2, #47, and #419) of three residents reviewed for choices. The facility identified 65 residents who required staff assistance or were dependent on staff with bathing. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 12/09/21 with a diagnosis of paraplegia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was cognitively intact, was coded negative for behavioral symptoms including refusal of care and was totally dependent on the assistance of staff with bathing. Review of the MDS assessment section F, dated 12/15/21, revealed Resident #47 considered it somewhat important to be able to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or sponge bath. Review of the care plan dated 01/28/22 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-03 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents were informed in writing of being cut from Medicare services. This affected two (Residents #117 and #118) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notice. The facility census was 68. Findings include: A review for beneficiary notices for Resident #117 and Resident #118, who were identified as residents discharged from a Medicare covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining, was conducted. Resident #117 was discharged on 02/12/22 and Resident #118 was discharged on 03/07/22. They did not receive a beneficiary notice regarding being cut from Medicare services. An interview was conducted with the Business Office Manager #820 on 04/28/22 at 12:55 P.M. She verified there were no cut letters provided for Residents #117 and #118.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-03 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents who discharged to the hospital received a transfer/discharge notice. This affected two (Residents #8 and #68) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease and vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the medical record revealed on 03/31/22, Resident #8 was sent to the emergency room for treatment and evaluation after indicating he was not feeling well. He was admitted to the hospital for a pacer placement. There was no evidence Resident #8's legal guardian was notified in writing of Resident #8's transfer to the hospital. 2. Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed Resident #68 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a care conference was provided for the residents and/or family member. This affected two (Residents #12 and #51) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included heart failure, dementia with behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder severe with psychotic symptoms, anxiety disorder, hypertension, primary generalized osteoarthritis, major depressive disorder, peripheral vascular disease, dysphagia, hypertensive retinopathy, hyperlipidemia, anemia, dysthymic disorder, scoliosis, Alzheimer's disease, dementia without behavioral disturbance, urge incontinence, open angle with borderline findings, history of falling, cardiomegaly, psychosis, age-related osteoporosis, muscle weakness, mild intellectual disabilities, hypokalemia, and insomnia. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, medical record review, review of the hospice contract, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to coordinate hospice services with the facility for Resident #14. This affected one (#14) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. The facility identified five residents receiving hospice care. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #14 included congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and chronic embolism. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had impaired cognition. Review of the physician orders dated 01/13/22 revealed Resident #14 had a new physician order for hospice services. Review of the plan of care, dated 01/20/22, revealed Resident #14 was identified to receive hospice services. The interventions included to coordinate facility care with the hospice provider. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, review of the facility's policy, and review of a professional wound care resource, the facility failed to ensure preventative devices were in place to prevent further skin breakdown as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #15) of nine facility-identified residents with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 10/08/21 with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction. Review of the physician orders dated 10/08/21 revealed an order for Resident #15 to have Sage boots (heel protectors) on at all times as tolerated. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one to two staff with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the care plan, last updated on 01/22/22, revealed Resident #15 had impaired skin integrity and had been admitted with pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to implement treatment measures and devices to prevent and minimize the risk of further contractures. This affected one (Resident #15) of two residents reviewed for contractures. The facility identified five residents with contractures. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 10/08/21 with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, section V, dated 09/26/21 revealed Resident #15 had a activity of daily livings (ADL) functional rehabilitation potential and had contractures. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance of one to two staff with ADLs, and had functional impairment on both sides to his upper and lower extremities on both sides. Review of the physical therapy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's policy, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide tube feeding equipment required for tube feeding administration for Resident #366 upon admission. This resulted in Resident #366's hospitalization. This affected one (Resident #366) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding administration. The facility identified two residents who receive tube feeding. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #366's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, Crohn disease, and protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/17/22, revealed Resident #366 had impaired cognition. Review of the hospital discharge physician orders, dated 04/17/22, revealed Resident #366 had orders for continuous tube feeding from the hospital. Review of nurse's notes dated 04/17/22 at 6:33 P.M. revealed Resident #366 was admitted to the facility. On 04/17/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of the facility's policy, and record review, the facility failed to date oxygen tubing per physician orders for Resident #48. This affected one (#48) of nine residents reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility identified 15 residents receiving respiratory treatments. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease and bradycardia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 had impaired cognition. Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #48 required oxygen as needed via nasal cannula to maintain saturation greater than 90% and to change out oxygen tubing and cannula and label with date and initials every night shift every Sunday. Observation on 04/26/22 at 11:39 A.M. of Resident #48's oxygen concentration at bedside revealed the oxygen tubing was dated 03/14/22.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview, observation, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to maintain a physician-ordered fluid restriction for a resident dependent on hemodialysis. This affected one (Resident #59) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility-identified one resident (#59) who was dialysis with a fluid restriction. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 03/12/22 with a diagnosis of end stage renal disease (ESRD.) Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #59 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the dietary progress note for Resident #59 dated 03/30/22 revealed dialysis clinic recommended a fluid restrictions for Resident #59 of 1,500 milliliters (ml) per day. The registered dietitian (RD) notified the nurse practitioner (NP), Director of Nursing (DON) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to implement an appropriate stop date for as needed anti-anxiety medication and failed to offer non-pharmacological medications prior to administration of as needed anti-anxiety medications. This affected one (Resident #64) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility identified eight residents with orders for anti-anxiety medications. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 03/16/22 with diagnoses including fracture of the femur, dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #64 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff with activities of daily living. Review of the care plan dated 03/23/22 revealed Resident #64 received anti-anxiety medication and could become restless and anxious when alone. Interventions included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-03 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of the medical record, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received liquids according to their physician orders. This affected one (Resident #12) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility identified two residents on thickened liquids. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 10/29/20. Diagnoses included Barrette's esophagus without dysplasia, dysphagia oropharyngeal phase, and vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/14/22, revealed Resident #12 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #12 required supervision with eating. Review of the physician orders, dated 04/21/22, revealed Resident #12's diet was to be downgraded to mechanical soft with nectar thickened liquids. Observation on 04/26/22 at 10:55 A.M. revealed Resident #12's breakfast meal tray was sitting on the bedside table. Resident #12's meal ticket read nectar thick. Resident #12's orange juice and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, review of the facility's policy, and review of online resources per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the facility failed to ensure staff wore facemasks covering their nose, mouth, and chin in resident areas and within close proximity to residents in order to help prevent the spread of Coronavirus (COVID-19). This affected two (Residents #47 and #64) of 68 residents in the facility. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 03/16/22 with diagnoses including fracture of the femur, dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #64 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff with activities of daily living (ADL). Observation on 04/25/22 at 6:15 P.M. revealed Receptionist #730 was seated at the front desk which was accessible to residents and greeted the survey team upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-04-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the planned menus approved by the Registered Dietitian (RD), and staff interview, the facility failed to follow the planned menus for pureed and mechanically soft diets. This had the potential to affect 13 of 13 residents on pureed or mechanically soft diets (#50, #5, #70, #75, #65, #13, #57, #20, #18, #76, #35, #133, and #62). The facility census was 78. Findings include: Food preparation and service for the evening meal on 04/02/19 was observed beginning at 4:00 P.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #43. Dietary Staff (DS) #35 had prepared the evening meal and was getting ready to serve assemble resident meal trays. The steam table was set up and the food temperatures had been taken and all were in acceptable range. At 4:32 P.M. DS #35 started tray assembly and the portion sizes of each menu items being served was verified with DS #35. Observation of the mechanically soft food and pureed food revealed that DS #35 was serving a #10 scoop, or approximately three ounces, each of pureed polish sausage, pureed peas, and mechanically soft (chopped) polish…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-04-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure walls, floors, and ceilings were maintained in good condition. This affected 22 Residents (#3, #6, #11, #12, #17, #18, #19, #20, #26, #32, #35, #36, #42, #44, #45, #52, #57, #63, #64, #66, #68, #73) residing on the 300 hall. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Observation on 04/01/19 from 11:58 A.M. to 12:12 P.M. of the 300 unit revealed the bottom of Resident #52's bathroom wall, in front of the toilet, was crumbling onto the floor. An approximate one foot piece of baseboard had detached from the wall and was on the floor next to the toilet. There was a large brown water stain to Residents #18 and #19's bathroom ceiling. The carpet throughout the 300 hall had numerous black stains and brown discoloration from high traffic. The hallways did not have any baseboards and had deep scrapes on the bottom two inches of the surrounding hall walls. In the common area, directly in front of the television, a light fixture had been removed leaving a hole in the ceiling. Surrounding the hole was a large water stain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-16 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and records review, the facility failed to obtain resident or Power of Attorney signatures to manage resident funds. This affected three (#29, #40 and #138) of six residents reviewed. The facility identified 47 residents whose funds are managed by the facility. The census was 78. Findings include: During review of the records for resident funds there was no signed authorization for Resident #29, Resident #40 and Resident #138. Two residents (Resident #29 and Resident #40) currently had funds in accounts being managed by the facility. Resident #138 was deceased and the facility was in the process of disbursing her funds. During an interview with the Administrator on [DATE] at 2:50 P.M., she verified there were no signed authorizations for these residents and stated she was not sure why signatures were missing.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), staff, resident, and detective interviews and police review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident's physician was notified when a significant change occurred in their physical status. This involved one (#40) of five residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and recently readmitted from the hospital on [DATE]. Diagnoses include unspecified multiple injuries, unspecified fracture of lower end of right femur, initial encounter for closed fracture, pain in left leg, pain in right leg, unsteadiness on feet, atherosclerotic heard disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, osteoarthritis, and vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance. The facility completed a quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS 3.0) of Resident #40's current physical and cognitive functional status dated 01/22/19. The facility identified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident that was discharged from Medicare Part A services was notified of the potential liability for payment. This affected one (#327) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Record review of Resident #327's chart revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur, long term use of anticoagulants, essential primary hypertension, age related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, history of falling, acute kidney failure, muscle weakness, dysphagia and chronic kidney disease. Further review of Resident #327's chart revealed resident discharged from the facility on 03/05/19. Review of Resident #327's chart revealed resident was admitted to Medicare Part A skilled services on 12/20/18 and had a last covered day of skilled services on 01/06/19. Further review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, review of facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI)/investigations, staff, resident, and detective interviews and policy review, the facility staff failed to immediately report allegations of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment to the Administration. This affected two (#40 and #55) out of five residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and recently readmitted from the hospital on [DATE]. Diagnoses include unspecified multiple injuries, unspecified fracture of lower end of right femur, initial encounter for closed fracture, pain in left leg, pain in right leg, unsteadiness on feet, atherosclerotic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, osteoarthritis, and vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 had good memory and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a written notice including reasons for transfer/discharge and appeal rights was provided to the resident, resident's representative, and ombudsman prior to transfer/discharge. This affected two (#52 and #77) of two Residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-entry date of 06/04/18. Diagnosis included metabolic encephalopathy, chronic kidney disease, and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of significant change minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making and extensive assistance was required with bed mobility, transfers, eating, toileting, and personal hygiene. Further medical record review revealed Resident #52 was discharged to the hospital from [DATE] to 02/21/19. A written notice explaining reasons for transfer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-16 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessments were transmitted to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) system. This affected one (#2) out of one resident reviewed for resident assessment. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include wedge compression fracture of first vertebra, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, adult failure to thrive, muscle weakness, anxiety disorder, low back pain, hypertension, constipation and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Resident #2 discharged from the facility to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of Resident #2's discharge Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be cognitively impaired and require extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. Resident #2 also required supervision with eating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BUCKEYE OP CO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2021
BUCKEYE HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2021
OMG MSTR LSCO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2021
RRW, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
STOLTZ, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2021
WILHEIM, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2021
KELLER MGT CO., LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/05/2025
GROVE, ROBBIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/05/2025
GROVES, DONNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
KHAN, SHAZIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/05/2025
C.R. STOLTZ FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
C.R. STOLTZ IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
HEALTH CARE HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
I. ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
I. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
R.S. WILHEIM IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
RONALD S WILHEIM 2012 SPOUSAL TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
S.L. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
WILHEIM FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense22% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 3%Other / private 20%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$329per resident / day
operating cost
$9,987per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$291per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365178. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next