No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Madeira Healthcare Center

6940 Stiegler Lane, Cincinnati, OH 45243 · For profit - Corporation · 98 certified beds · (513) 561-6400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$16,801 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $16,801 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-04)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
7829 Laurel Ave · (513) 561-6266 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7023 Miami Ave · (513) 561-7700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.3 mi
6950 Miami Ave · (513) 271-1260 · Call to confirm hours
Park
6700 Marvin Ave · (513) 561-7228 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.4%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms69.3%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.5%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.1%25.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.9%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.7%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.2%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.9%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.4%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.621.731.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.541.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 74 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
90.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 90.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.4%CMS range 34.4–61.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 6.9–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge90.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge77.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge81.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.1–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.171.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.73
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.89
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.58
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.72
RN hoursweekends
57.7%
Total nursing turnover
56.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 88.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-27)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2022-04-04)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interviews, review of a police report, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement timely interventions for exit-seeking behaviors for Resident #37, who was cognitively impaired, had a history of wandering and exit seeking behavior and who resided in a secured unit, to prevent his elopement from the facility without staff knowledge. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, injuries, and/or death on [DATE] when Resident #37 left the secured unit, got in a car in the parking lot which had the keys inside and drove approximately 8.2 miles away from the facility. Resident #37 was missing from the facility for approximately two hours before staff were notified the resident had been located by the police and would be returned to the facility. This affected one (Resident #37) of three residents reviewed for elopement risk. The facility identified 21 residents (#25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel records and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a qualified activities director. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility with the exception of 14 facility- identified residents (#3, #8, #12, #36, #45, #50,#51, #62, #67, #73, #78, #81, #82, and #89 ) who did not participate in facility activities. The facility census was 91 residents.Findings include: Review of the personnel record for Activities Director (AD) #100 revealed a hire date of 04/02/26. Further review of the personnel record for AD #100 revealed she did not meet the qualifications required to be an activity director in the facility. Interview on 04/23/26 at 6:00 P.M. with the Regional Director of Clinical Operations confirmed AD#100 was hired 04/02/26 and did not meet the requirements to be employed as a qualified activity director in the facility.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of records for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 12/16/22 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, heart transplant, kidney transplant, and Alzheimer's Disease. Review of MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of progress notes revealed no documentation of care conferences being performed. Interview on 03/25/25 at 1:42 P.M. Regional Director of Clinical Operations (RDCO) #200 verified the lack of documentation for care conferences as required. 3. Review of records for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 05/27/21 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (MS), extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance, and contracture of hand. \ Review of MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 had some cognitive impairment. Further review of the medical record revealed care conferences documented on 05/03/22 and 02/09/23, no care conferences were documented for 2024 or 2025. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to prevent food contamination. This affected one (Resident #7) of two residents observed being fed in the dining room. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of multiple sclerosis, dysphagia, morbid obesity and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 had moderate cognitive impairment and was always incontinent of bowel and had a urostomy. The resident was dependent for eating, oral and personal hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, bed mobility and transfers. Observation on 03/24/25 at 1:02 P.M. of the lunch meal service revealed Resident #7 was being fed by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #8. On the resident's plate was a cheese quesadilla, mashed potatoes and mixed vegetables. During the observation, CNA #7 used his bare fingers to tear off a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect during incontinence care by protecting a resident's private space. This affected one (#19) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of intracerebral hemorrhage, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, morbid (severe) obesity, encephalopathy, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was cognitively intact and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident required set up assistance for eating, was dependent for dressing, and required maximal assistance for oral and personal hygiene, toileting, bathing, bed mobility, and transfers. Observation on 01/22/25 from 11:20 A.M to 11:50 A.M. revealed Resident #19 was receiving incontinence care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital documentation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely implement pressure ulcer prevention interventions as ordered. This affected one (#002) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #002 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], after being hospitalized from [DATE] to 12/13/24, with diagnoses of traumatic brain injury (TBI), multiple sclerosis, Huntington's disease, chronic kidney disease stage III, acute kidney injury, lupus, cirrhosis, hypertension, anemia, and hyperlipidemia. The resident was discharged on 12/24/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #002 had severe cognitive impairment, no range of motion impairments, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident required total assistance with eating, oral and personal hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, bed mobility and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain adequate infection control practices during incontinence care. This affected one (#19) of one residents observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of intracerebral hemorrhage, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, morbid (severe) obesity, encephalopathy, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was cognitively intact and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident required set up assistance for eating, was dependent for dressing, and required maximal assistance for oral and personal hygiene, toileting, bathing, bed mobility, and transfers. Observation on 01/22/25 from 11:20 A.M to 11:50 A.M. revealed Resident #19 was receiving incontinence care while in bed from Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #575 while Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, and served in a manner to prevent the spread of foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect 74 out of 75 residents. The facility identified one resident (#50) who received nothing by mouth and did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Observation on 03/28/22 at 9:52 A.M. of the walk-in refrigerator revealed a tray containing seven small plastic containers with covers. The containers contained yellow jello with marshmallows and had 3/12 on the lid. Culinary Director (CD) #631 was present at the time of the observation and verified the cups were dated 3/12 and stated the cups were prepared on 03/12/22 and should have been thrown out after five days (03/17/22). 2. Observation on 03/28/22 at 11:48 A.M. revealed [NAME] #624 was wearing gloves, entered the walk-in refrigerator and exited with a tomato, onion, and lettuce. [NAME] #624 took a knife and sliced the tomato and onion, and tore the lettuce, then stacked the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-04-04 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure trash cans in the food preparation area were covered. This had the potential to affect all 74 residents who receive meals from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#50) who received nothing by mouth and did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Observation on 03/28/22 at 8:18 A.M. revealed an uncovered trash can on wheels next to the counter, which contained the meat slicer. Observation on 03/28/22 at 11:45 A.M. revealed an uncovered trash can on wheels sitting directly next to a counter containing a tray of small cups of portioned cake. Interview on 03/28/22 at 11:47 A.M., with Culinary Director (CD) #631 verified there were no covers on the trash cans in the food preparation area.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Medical record review for Resident #21 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to open wound right and left lower leg, obesity, necrotizing fasciitis, depression, non pressure chronic ulcer lower leg, obstructive sleep apnea, mental disorder, and osteoarthritis. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #21 revealed an intact cognition. Review of the plan of care for Resident #21 dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had impaired skin integrity, or was at risk for altered skin integrity due to open wound to right and left lower leg related to necrotizing fascitits. Interventions included administer medications as ordered, monitor for side effects and effectiveness, administer treatments as ordered by medical provider, apply barrier creams post incontinent episodes, assist with repositioning, assist with toileting, bilateral assist bars, and educate resident on need for turning and repositioning. Review of the physician orders for Resident #21 revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility contracts, the facility failed to arrange for dental services for six (#10, #21, #38, #40, #50, and #51) of seven residents reviewed for dental care. The census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an original admission date of 09/10/20 with a diagnosis of spina bifida. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #38 dated 02/16/22 revealed Resident #38 was cognitively intact. Review of the March 2022 monthly physician orders for Resident #38 revealed an order dated 02/04/22 for Resident #38 to have a dental consult. Observation on 03/28/22 at 10:43 A.M. of Resident #38 revealed Resident #38 had natural teeth. Interview on 03/28/22 at 10:43 A.M. with Resident #38 confirmed she had not seen a dentist since she was admitted to the facility, that no one had offered her a dental visit, and that she would like to have regular dental visits in order to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were served meals in a dignified manner. This affected one (Resident #47) out of 74 residents in the facility who receive meals from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#50) who did not receive meals from the kitchen. The census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 02/01/22 with a diagnosis of epilepsy. Review of Resident #47's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was cognitively impaired, and required supervision and set up help with eating. Observation on 03/28/22 at 12:26 P.M. revealed Resident #47 was sitting in the common area with Resident #31 and Resident #182. Resident #31 and Resident #182 were seated with overbed tables in front of them in preparation for the lunch meal. There was no table or surface to serve Resident #47's meal tray. Further observation revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure resident advanced directives included the required signatures and followed the wishes of the residents. This affected three residents (#1, #38, #72) of eighteen residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 75. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #72's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a readmission date of [DATE]. Resident #72's diagnoses included congestive heart failure, adult failure to thrive, hypertension, presence of cardiac pacemaker, and depression. Review of Resident #72's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #72's plan of care dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 was a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC) code status. The interventions included to obtain medical provider order for code status, obtain copies to have on file, and review the code status quarterly and as needed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-04 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the ombudsman was notified of resident discharges. This affected three (Resident #25, #50, and #83) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #83 revealed an admission date of 01/11/22. Resident #83 discharged from the facility on 02/15/22 and did not return. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung, atrial flutter, type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, essential hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #83 had intact cognition. Review of the medical record for Resident #83 revealed no evidence of the ombudsman having been notified of Resident #83's discharge. Interview on 03/30/22 at 3:39 P.M. with Social Worker (SW) #633 revealed he was aware of the need to notify the ombudsman of discharges, however he was unsure who was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-04 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or resident representative was notified of the facility's bed hold policy in writing upon transfer to the hospital. This affected three (Resident #25, #50, and #83) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #83 revealed an admission date of 01/11/22. Resident #83 discharged from the facility to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return. Resident #83 had diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung, atrial flutter, type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, essential hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #83 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #83's medical record revealed no evidence of Resident #83 nor Resident #83's representative having been notified of the facility bed hold policy in writing upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, observations and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to conduct care planning conferences. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census is 75. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #10 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to post traumatic osteoarthritis, hypertension, and overactive bladder. Review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had intact cognition. Review of the progress notes for Resident #10 dated 12/25/21 to 03/30/22 revealed they were silent for any documentation the resident and/or resident representative was given advance notice for a care conference appointment. Further review of progress notes for Resident #10 revealed they were silent for a care conference meeting. Interview with Social Worker (SW) #633 on 03/29/22 at 10:25 A.M. verified no care conferences have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 01/20/22. Diagnoses included adult failure to thrive, cognitive communication deficit, need for assistance with personal care, and weakness. Review of the Resident #70's quarterly MDS asssessment revealed Resident #70 had severely impaired cognition and did not exhibit any behaviors during the assessment period. Review of Resident #70's care plan dated 03/11/22 revealed the resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to adult failure to thrive. Interventions included to provide limited assistance with grooming, bathing, and hygiene. Observation on 03/28/22 at 9:24 A.M. revealed Resident #70 resting in bed. Resident #70's fingernails were observed to extend approximately half of an inch beyond the finger tip. Concurrent interview with Resident #70 revealed he wanted his fingernails cut. Observation on 03/29/22 at 8:34 A.M. revealed Resident #70 walking on the unit with a walker. The resident's fingernails were observed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments as ordered by the physician. This affected two (Resident #36 and #75) of nineteen residents reviewed for skin assessments. The facility census was 75. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 01/04/19. Resident #36's medical diagnoses included cerebral palsy, diabetes mellitus, respiratory failure, history of traumatic brain injury, mood disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #36's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 was severely cognitive impaired. Resident #36 required total two-person physical assist for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, and personal hygiene, and required total dependence one-person physical assist for dressing and bathing. Review of Resident #36's plan of care dated 02/20/22 revealed Resident #36 was at risk for developing a pressure ulcer related to deconditioned and muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-04 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to arrange for vision and hearing services. This affected one (Resident #51) of three residents reviewed for communication and sensory needs. The census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 11/26/21 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD) and diabetes mellitus (DM). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #51 dated 02/16/22 revealed Resident #51 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff with activities of daily living (ADLs). Further review of the MDS for Resident #51 revealed it was coded negative for Resident #51 wearing eyeglasses. Review of the March 2022 monthly physician orders for Resident #51 dated 02/02/22 revealed an order for Resident #51 to have an optometry or ophthalmology consult. Observation on 03/28/22 at 2:42 P.M. of Resident #51 revealed Resident #51 was wearing prescription glasses. Interview on 03/28/22 at 2:42 P.M. with Resident #51…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to order and implement a hand splint as documented for a resident with impaired range of motion. This affected one (Resident #38) of two residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. The census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an original admission date of 09/10/20 with a diagnosis of spina bifida. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #38 dated 02/16/22 revealed Resident #38 was cognitively intact and was totally dependent on assistance of staff with bed mobility, transfer, and hygiene. Review of the care plan for Resident #38 dated 02/22/22 revealed it was silent regarding the use of a hand splint. Review of the nurse progress notes for Resident #38 dated 07/01/21 through 03/28/22 revealed the notes were silent regarding the use of a hand splint for Resident #38. Review of the Resident #38's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for March 2022 revealed it did not include the use of a hand splint. Review of an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented according to evaluations and the care plan. This affected two (Resident #41 and #72) of five residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 05/13/21 with a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure (ARF). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #41 dated 02/09/22 revealed Resident #41 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two staff with activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the care plan for Resident #41 dated 02/22/22 revealed Resident #41 was at risk for falls related to diagnoses including, vascular dementia with behaviors, metabolic encephalopathy, depression, schizophrenia, and epilepsy. Interventions included anticipate Resident #41's needs and assist with positioning. Review of occupational therapy (OT)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident oxygen tubing was dated as well as ensure handheld nebulizer (HHN) machines and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machines in resident rooms had physician orders for use. This affected two (Residents #21 and #40) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 01/05/22 with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the lung. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #40 dated 02/09/22 revealed Resident #40 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two staff with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the March 2022 monthly physician orders for Resident #40 revealed an order dated 01/06/22 for resident to receive oxygen two liters per minute (LPM) continuously per nasal cannula (NC) as well as an order dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received effective pain management and staff adequately assessed residents for pain. This affected one (Resident #40) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 01/05/22 with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set for Resident #40 dated 02/09/22 revealed Resident #40 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two staff with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the care plan for Resident #40 dated 02/22/22 revealed Resident #40 had complaints of acute/chronic pain. Interventions included to provide medication per orders, monitor for side effects, evaluate effectiveness of medication, and observe for pain every shift. Review of the March 2022 monthly physician order for Resident #40 revealed an order dated 01/07/22 for Norco four times per day routinely for pain. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 03/04/22 at approximately 3:00 P.M. Resident #82 discharged from the facility on 03/05/22 at approximately 12:00 P.M. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, difficulty in walking, type one diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, and weakness. Review of a nursing progress note dated 03/05/22 at 12:29 P.M. revealed Resident #82's son arrived at the facility and informed staff he was taking Resident #82 home. The nurse informed the son that Resident #82 admitted the day prior and none of her medications had arrived yet and would probably not be delivered until later in the evening. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) for March 2022 revealed Resident #82 had orders for the following routine medications: amlodipine besylate (antihypertensive) daily at 8:00 A.M., atorvastatin calcium (antihyperlipidemic) daily at 9:00 P.M., clopidogrel bisulfate (anticoagulant) daily at 6:00 P.M., insulin glargine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate indications for the use of antipsychotic medications as well as complete appropriate monitoring after starting an antipsychotic medication. This affected two (#08 and #36) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #08 revealed an admission date of 04/26/20. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, acute kidney failure, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, major depressive disorder, insomina, peripheral vascular diseases, generalized anxiety disorder, alzheimer's disease, dementia without behavioral disturbance, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #08 had severely impaired cognition. The resident did not exhibit behaviors during the assessment period. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record of Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 03/04/22 at approximately 3:00 P.M. The resident discharged from the facility on 03/05/22 at approximately 12:00 P.M. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, difficulty in walking, type one diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, and weakness. Review of a nursing progress note dated 03/05/22 at 12:29 P.M. revealed Resident #82's son arrived at the facility and informed staff he was taking Resident #82 home. The nurse informed the son that Resident #82 admitted the day prior and none of her medications had arrived yet and would probably not be delivered until later in the evening. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) for March 2022 revealed Resident #82 had orders for the following routine medications: insulin glargine daily at 6:00 P.M., and insulin lispro three times daily at 8:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M. and 5:00 P.M. Further review of the MAR revealed none of the medications listed were administered. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter drainage bags were not stored directly on the floor. This affected one (Resident #50) of seven facility identified residents with urinary catheters. The census was 75. Findings Include: Medical record review for Resident #50 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to Alzheimer's disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, type two diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #50 revealed Resident #50 had impaired cognition. No behaviors were coded during the assessment period. Resident #50 had an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the plan of care for Resident #50 dated 01/17/22 revealed Resident #50 had an indwelling catheter due to neurogenic bladder. Interventions included change catheter per orders, observe for pain and discomfort related to catheter, provide catheter care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a complete water management plan to monitor for the risk, growth, and spread of Legionella. This had the potential to affect all 63 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's Legionella plan revealed no water line tracking and/or tracking for high risk areas including but not limited to dead leg areas, ice machines, and/or tubs. The facility maintained no physical controls, temperature management including acceptable ranges for control measures, no disinfectant level controls, no visual inspection monitoring, no environmental testing for pathogens, and/or no documented results of the testing and/or corrective actions taken when control limits are not maintained. Interview conducted on 04/25/19 at 11:20 A.M. the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #4 stated he had never received any training related to Legionella prevention in the facility. Interview conducted on 04/25/19 at 11:43 A.M. Corporate Director of Nursing (DON) #3 stated she was over the Legionella prevention for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-04-25 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to convey funds of residents upon discharge(discharge/death/eviction). This affected 20 (Residents #101, #102, #103. #104, #105, #106, #107, #108, #109, #110, #112, #116, #120, #121, #122, #124, #125, #126, #129, and #130) of 30 residents who discharged from the facility with remaining funds in their accounts. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of medical record and facility funds record reviews revealed Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged [DATE], with a remaining balance in the funds account of $134.24 Review of the medical record and facility funds records reviews revealed Resident #102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged on [DATE], with a remaining balance in the funds account of $85.00. Review of the medical record and facility funds records reviews revealed Resident #103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged on [DATE], with a remaining balance in the funds account of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff and resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to treat a resident with dignity and respect when he attempted to contact the kitchen to make food choices and was hung up on three times. This affected one Resident #8 of 24 resident's reviewed for dignity during the initial pool sample of the annual survey. The facility census was 63. Findings include: During interview with Resident #8 on 04/22/19 at 11:08 A.M. and again on 04/25/19 at 9:05 A.M., the resident stated on Sunday 04/21/19, he called the kitchen around 5:30 P.M. to see why the menu was changed and why he didn't get what he ordered for dinner. The resident stated earlier that day he was told by staff that dinner consisted of roast beef and he received sausage instead, and he didn't get the vegetable soup he requested. Resident #8 stated the first time he called, a male answered the phone and hung up on him. He stated he called right back and the same male answered the phone again, Resident #8 stated he said also, and the man hung up on him again. Resident #8 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to serve food to residents in a homelike environment. This directly affected two (Residents #13 and #53) and had the potential to affect all 14 residents present at the time of the observation. The facility census was 63. Findings include: The main dining room on Plaza 1 was observed during the lunch time meal on 04/22/19. There were 14 residents present. All 14 residents were served their food and beverage items on trays, the trays placed directly in front of the residents, and the food and beverages not removed from the tray. Resident #13 eating at a table my himself was observed removing the menu items from the tray and placing them on the table in front of where he was going to sit. In the process he dropped his bowl of tossed salad on the floor. An interview was conducted with Resident #13 on 04/22/19 at 12:32 P.M. regarding his food being served on trays. He stated that they usually place the food on the table, but not always, and he preferred to have it served on the table. Resident #53 eating lunch in the Plaza 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately assess one resident's contractures with subsequent limitations in range of motion. This involved one(Resident #33) of three residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including altered mental status, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, metabolic encephalopathy, aphasia, age-related physical debility, and diabetes mellitus. The facility completed a Medicare 30 day minimum data set (MDS) assessment of Resident #33's cognitive and physical functional status dated 04/09/19. The 04/09/19 assessment identified the resident as have short and long term memory problems, severely impaired cognitive sills, and requiring the physical assistance of one to two staff persons to complete all activities of daily living including eating. The resident was assessed as having no limitations in range of motion of the upper or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to feed themselves reviewed the necessary services to maintain good nutrition. This affected two (Residents #18 and #33) of six residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, chronic pain, insomnia, depressive episodes, schizophrenia, and dysphagia. The quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] identified the resident as having poor short and long term memory, severely impaired cognitive skills, and requiring the physical assistance of one staff person to eat. On 04/22/19 at 1:16 P.M. State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #102 finish passing trays on one section of rooms on Plaza 1 including Resident #18's room. On 04/22/19 at 1:28 P.M. Resident #18 was observed lying in a low bed with her meal tray covered and out of reach on an over bed table in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-25 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure bed rails continued to be safe and appropriate to use when a new specialty mattress overlay was applied to the mattress. This affected one (Resident #18) of two residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, chronic pain, insomnia, depressive episodes, schizophrenia, and dysphagia. The quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] identified the resident as having poor short and long term memory, severely impaired cognitive skills, and requiring the physical assistance of one to two staff persons for bed mobility, transferring, and walking in her room and corridor. Resident #18 had two falls since the prior MDS assessment without serious injury. Review of Resident #18's current physician's orders revealed an order for bilateral assist bars while in bed for assistance with turning and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,801 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-12-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BUCKEYE OP CO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2021
BUCKEYE HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2021
OMG MSTR LSCO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2021
C.R. STOLTZ IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
STOLTZ, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2021
WILHEIM, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2021
CAMARGO MGT CO., LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
GROVES, DONNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
KHAN, SHAZIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
WALLEN, VALERIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2021
ODENTHAL, RICHARDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/08/2025
C.R. STOLTZ FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
CAMARGO ASSET CO., LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
HEALTH CARE HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
I. ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
I. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
R.S. WILHEIM IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
RONALD S WILHEIM 2012 SPOUSAL TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
RRW, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
S.L. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
WILHEIM FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.2M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 5%Other / private 26%

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$350per resident / day
operating cost
$10,643per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$332per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365562. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next