No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Parkview Northwest Healthcare Center

3875 East Galbraith Road, Cincinnati, OH 45236 · For profit - Corporation · 73 certified beds · (513) 793-5222 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Feb 2019Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$36,185 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $36,185 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-07)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8251 Pine Rs · (513) 936-9191 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
(513) 757-9019 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3950 E Galbraith Rd · (513) 984-5249 · Call to confirm hours
Park
7640 Plainfield Rd · (513) 794-8860 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3850 E Galbraith Rd · (513) 791-7631

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.6%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.6%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms80.8%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.5%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.2%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%3.4%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.9%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.0%8.8%17.1%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.07U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.02hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
0.55
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.22
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.53
RN hoursweekends
35.9%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 73 beds and averages 60.7 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-09-12)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2021-08-30)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility's investigation, review of the witness statements, review of the facilities self-reported incidents (SRIs), review of an emergency medical services (EMS) report, review of hospital records, review of emergency room (ER) notes, review of the local weather report, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement timely interventions for exit-seeking behaviors for Resident #39, who was cognitively impaired, had a history of recent exit-seeking behaviors, and who resided in a secured unit, to prevent his elopement from the facility without staff knowledge. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, injuries, and/or death on [DATE] when Resident #39 broke the window in his room using a fire extinguisher and later returned to the room and exited the secured building by jumping out of the second story window, approximately 13 feet from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) Level II was completed after a significant change in resident status. This affected one (Resident #14) of two residents reviewed for PASARRs. The facility census was 46 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 08/12/22 with diagnoses including obstructive and reflux uropathy, benign prostatic hypertrophy, gastro-esophageal reflux disease and insomnia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #14 dated 07/20/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required set up with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the diagnosis list for Resident #14 revealed the resident had a new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type added on 07/03/24 by the facility. Review of the PASARR for Resident #14 dated 03/22/21 revealed the resident was ruled out of the PASARR population because dementia was likely to be the primary focus of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-08-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of the nursing staffing schedules, staff interviews and review of the staff roster, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) in the facility for at least eight hours a day, seven days a week and failed to have a full time Director of Nursing (DON) employed at the facility. This had the potential to affect all 27 residents residing at the facility. Facility census was 27. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility nurse staffing schedules for 08/21/21 and 08/22/21 revealed there was not an RN scheduled to work in the facility. Interview with RN #100 on 08/25/21 at 11:00 A.M. verified there was not an RN present in the facility on 08/21/21 or 08/22/21. 2. Interview with the DON on 08/25/21 at 11:20 A.M. revealed she was the DON for the facility as well as the facility located next door and was the only DON employed at both facilities. The DON stated she worked approximately 50 hours per week and split the time between the two facilities. Review of the facility staff roster revealed the DON was the only RN employed as a DON at the facility.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of online resources per the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Studies (CMS), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff wore eye protection in resident areas. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) which affected one (Resident #172) of one facility-identified residents on transmission based precautions. The facility also failed to properly sanitize blood glucose meters which affected one (Resident #173) out of two facility-identified residents with physician orders for finger stick blood sugar testing. The census was 27. Findings include: 1. Observation on 08/23/21 at 8:10 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #16, at 8:15 A.M. of State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #104, and at 8:20 A.M. of STNA #13, revealed staff were working in resident care areas and were not wearing eye protection. Interviews on 08/23/21 at 8:10 A.M. of LPN #16 at 8:15 A.M. of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure controlled substance medications were properly counted. This had the potential to affect five (#10, #19, #122, #172, #273) of five residents with controlled substances being stored in Cart 2. The census was 27. Findings include: 1. Review of the controlled substance count sheet for Cart 2 revealed the nurse had not signed the count sheet at the beginning of her shift, 7:00 A.M. on 08/23/21. Interview on 08/23/21 at 3:14 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #16 confirmed she had not signed the count sheet for the controlled substances at the beginning of her shift on 08/23/21. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #122 revealed an admission date of 01/19/21 with a diagnosis of encounter for orthopedic aftercare and a discharge date of 06/30/21. Review of the physician orders for Resident #122 revealed an order dated 05/12/21 for oxycodone five milligrams. Review of the controlled substance record for Resident #122 revealed resident had six oxycodone tablets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 03/23/21 with diagnosis including depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms, mood disorder, unspecified psychosis and bipolar disorder. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. Review of the physician orders for 08/21 revealed Resident #16 was taking Risperidone one milligram (mg) by mouth daily for mood disorder, Venlafaxine Hydrochloride extended release 75 mg by mouth-take three tablets to equal 225 mg-daily for mood disorder and Lithium Carbonate extended release 300 mg by mouth every 12 hours for mood disorder. Review of the 07/21 pharmacy recommendations and note to the attending physician/prescriber revealed the pharmacy recommended obtaining a Lithium level now and every three months, a basic metabolic panel every every three moths, and a thyroid-stimulating hormone level every six months. The recommendations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident #72 medical record revealed an admission order of 07/29/21. Diagnoses included bipolar, and anxiety. Review of the most recent five-day MDS assessment revealed Resident #72 was cognitively impaired. Review of the physicians orders dated on 07/29/21 and 08/01/21 revealed an order for an antianxiety medication (Ativan) 0.5 mg (milligrams) to be given every six hours as needed. The medication did not have a stop date. Review of the 08/21 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the resident received one dose on 08/22/21. Observations of Resident #72 on 08/23/21 and 08/24/21 at random times noted the resident was usually in the dining room with his head on the table asleep. Interview with Registered Nurse #99 on 08/24/21 at 4:30 P.M. verified there was no stop date for the medication, and it should not have went through without clarification for a stop date. 4. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 03/23/21 with diagnosis including depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of manufacturer's recommendation, the facility failed to ensure tuberculosis (TB) testing solution was dated upon opening. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility except for Resident #18 who was identified by the facility as being allergic to TB testing solution. The census was 27. Findings include: Observation on [DATE] at 3:10 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #16 revealed there were two open undated vials of TB testing solution being stored in the medication refrigerator. Interview on [DATE] at 3:10 P.M. with LPN #16 confirmed there were two open undated vials of TB testing solution being stored in the medication refrigerator. LPN #16 confirmed TB testing solution should be dated upon opening and discarded when expired. The facility confirmed this could potentially affect all the residents residing in the facility except Resident #18 who is allergic to the TB testing solution. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza immunization and pneumococcal immunization. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents either received the influenza immunization and pneumococcal immunization or did not receive the influenza immunization and pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindications or refusal. This affected five (#4, #5, #13, #14, and #17) out of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 27. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 11/28/20 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with early onset, delirium due to known physiological condition, and type two diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure residents have call lights in reach. This affected two (#4 and #172) of 13 residents sampled for call lights. The census was 27. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed resident was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of early onset Alzheimer's disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #4 dated 05/10/21 revealed resident was cognitively impaired and was totally dependent on assistance of one to two staff with activities of daily living (ADL's). Review of the care plan for Resident #4 dated 12/29/20 revealed resident is at risk for falls related to gait/balance problems, incontinence, psychoactive drug use, unaware of safety needs, and vision/hearing problems. Interventions included to be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record was updated regarding a residents code status. This affected one (#17) of 13 residents sampled. The census was 27. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 04/14/21 with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, unspecified psychosis, and mood disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #17 dated 07/22/21 revealed resident was cognitively impaired and required supervision and set up help of one staff with activities of daily living. Review of the care plan for Resident #17 revealed it was silent regarding code status for resident. Review of the August 2021 monthly physician orders in the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #17 revealed an order dated 07/01/21 for resident's code status to be do not resuscitate comfort care (DNRCC). Review of the paper medical record, hard chart for Resident #17 revealed it did not include a DNRCC form or any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident and staff interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurate regarding dental status. This affected two (#4 and #17) of 13 residents sampled. The census was 27. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 11/28/20 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Review of the comprehensive MDS assessment for Resident #4 dated 12/05/20 revealed resident was not coded accurately regarding dental status and was not coded as edentulous (having no natural teeth). Review of the care area assessment worksheets for Resident #4 revealed resident did not trigger for care planning related to dental care. Review of the care plan for Resident #4 revealed it contained no documentation regarding dental care. Observation on 08/23/21 at 8:39 A.M. of Resident #4 revealed resident was edentulous. Interview on 08/23/21 at 8:39 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-30 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record included a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) prior to admission to the facility. This affected one (#17) of 13 residents sampled. The census was 27. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 04/14/21 with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, unspecified psychosis, and mood disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #17 dated 07/22/21 revealed resident was cognitively impaired and required supervision and set up help of one staff with activities of daily living. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed it did not include a Level II PASARR screen prior to admission. Interview on 08/25/21 at 9:00 A.M. with Regional Registered Nurse (RN) #99 confirmed the facility did not have evidence of completion of a Level II PASARR prior to admission for Resident #17. RN #99 confirmed Resident #17 had a diagnoses of psychosis which would require a Level II…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans reflected resident dental status and/or elopement risk and residing in a secured unit. This affected three (#4, #17 and #19) of 13 residents sampled. The census was 27. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 11/28/20 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #4 dated 12/05/20 revealed resident was not coded accurately regarding dental status and was not coded as edentulous (having no natural teeth). Review of the care area assessment worksheets for Resident #4 revealed resident did not trigger for care planning related to dental care. Review of the care plan for Resident #4 revealed it contained no documentation regarding dental care. Observation on 08/23/21 at 8:39 A.M. of Resident #4 revealed resident was edentulous. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-30 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to complete a recapitulation of a discharged resident's stay. This affected one (#23) out of three residents reviewed for closed records. The facility census was 27. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including displaced bicondylar fracture of right tibia, other fracture of upper and lower end of right fibula, fracture of nasal bones, anterior dislocation of left humerus, encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, acute pain due to trauma, pulmonary embolism, and alcohol abuse. Further review of Resident #23's discharge record revealed Resident #23 discharged home on [DATE]. Review of Resident #23's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be cognitively intact and required supervision with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene and eating. Review of the discharge planning review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident and staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to offer activity programming per the activity calendar. This affected one (#17) of one residents reviewed for activities. The census was 27. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 04/14/21 with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, unspecified psychosis, and mood disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #17 dated 04/21/21 revealed resident was cognitively intact and required supervision and set up help of one staff with activities of daily living. Review of section F of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 considered the following activities to be very important: to have books, newspaper, and magazines, to listen to music he likes, to be around animals such as pets, to do things with groups of people, to do his favorite activities, to go outside when weather is good, to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-30 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure bed rails were used appropriately. This affected one (#4) of two facility-identified residents with rails to their beds. The census was 27. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 11/28/20 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with behavioral disturbance. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #4 dated 05/10/21 revealed resident was cognitively impaired, totally dependent on the assistance of two staff with bed mobility and is coded negative for the use of bed rails. Review of the side rail assessment for Resident #4 dated 11/28/20 revealed resident did not use the device to turn from side to side, resident did not express a desire to use the device, device is not in use due to a medical diagnosis. Further review of the medical record revealed the facility had not completed a reassessment regarding side rail use for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-30 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents have adaptive feeding equipment in place per the physician orders. This affected one (#4) of one residents with adaptive devices for eating. The census was 27. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed resident was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of early onset Alzheimer's disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #4 dated 05/10/21 revealed resident was cognitively impaired and was totally dependent on assistance of one staff with eating. Review of physician orders for Resident #4 revealed an order dated 12/17/20 for resident to utilize a sippy cup with all liquids. Review of nurse progress note for Resident #4 dated 12/17/20 revealed resident's representative was notified of new physician's order for resident to utilize a sippy cup with liquids. Review of the care plan for Resident #4 dated 05/07/21 revealed resident was at risk for impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately document the dental status for two residents (#19 and #242) of the five residents reviewed for dental concerns. The facility census was 27. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 06/19/21 with diagnoses to include severe protein-calorie malnutrtion, dysphagia, adult failure to thrive, and bipolar disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/23/21, revealed this resident was cognitively intact and required supervision with set-up assistance for bed mobility, toileting, transfers, and eating. Review of the facility admission Assessment and Baseline Care Plan, dated 06/19/21, revealed Resident #19 was edentulous and did not have any broken or carious teeth. Review of the care plan for Resident #19 revealed it was silent regarding dental care. Observation of Resident #19 on 08/23/21 at 11:29 A.M. revealed Resident #19 had multiple teeth which were broken near the gum line and rotted.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident call light was functioning. This affected one (Resident #173) out of 16 residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 27. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #173 revealed an admission date of 08/09/21 with diagnoses including dysphagia, weakness, type two diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #173's admission initial evaluation dated 08/09/21 revealed Resident #173 was alert and cognitively intact. Review of Resident #173's activities of daily living care plan dated 08/11/21 revealed Resident #173 required assistance with activities of daily living. Interventions include place call light within reach, extensive assistance with ambulation, extensive assistance with bathing, extensive assistance with bed mobility, extensive assistance with dressing, extensive assistance with hygiene, extensive assistance with toileting, extensive assistance with transfers and supervision with eating. Observation of Resident #173's room on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-02-21 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Safe Serve and staff interview the facility failed to have any dietary staff certified in food service management and safety. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of documentation of certification for dietary staff revealed Registered Dietician (RD) #1 was Safe Serv Level Two certified. During an interview with RD #1 on 02/20/19 at 11:18 A.M., she verified she held a Safe Serv Level Two certification and was in the facility on Wednesdays and Thursdays. At the same time, Dietary Manager (DM) #1 stated he was scheduled for the January class for Safe Serv Level 2 but it was canceled due to the weather. DM #1 stated he was scheduled for the class on 04/23/19. He further verified currently none of the facility dietary staff have Safe Serv Level One or Level Two certification. During an interview with DM #1 on 02/21/19 at 9:26 A.M., he stated he had an Associate degree in Culinary Arts obtained from a local Technical College in 2000 and documentation was requested. On 02/21/19 at 10:12 A.M…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-02-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of the resident census and review of facility policy the facility failed to maintain residents rooms in a clean and sanitary manner. Holes were noted on the walls with exposing dry wall and wood, and window blinds were dirty. This affected three rooms (7, 12 and 13) of 15 rooms on the lower level. The facility identified six Resident's (#1, #4, #20, #21, #22 and #190) who resided in the affected rooms. The facility census was 40. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview conducted on 02/20/19 at 11:21 A.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #26 verified the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER] next to the bathroom had a quarter edge and dry wall missing, exposing the wood. LPN #26 verified there was noted patch work completed on the wall that appeared to be done sometime ago due to the patch work had new holes and scuff marks noted. LPN #26 stated she was unsure how long the holes had been on the walls and/or when the patch work was completed. Observation and interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-02-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of census list and review of facility policy the facility failed to maintain the canopy over the courtyard on the lower level. This had the potential to affect 16 residents (#1, #3, #4, #5, #8, #11, #15, #17, #18, #20, #22, #27, #36, #37, # 38 and #190) who resided on the secured unit and used the courtyard. Total census of the facility was 40. Observation on 02/19/19 at 11:32 A.M. of the lower level courtyard attached to the secured unit, revealed the canopy was in disrepair. Further observation revealed several holes in the canopy and a large area where the canopy was completely separated from the frame and hanging down. Interview on 02/21/19 at 11:10 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON), verified the canopy over the courtyard had several holes in it and a large area where the canopy was separated from the frame and hanging down. Review of census list revealed 16 residents (#1, #3, #4, #5, #8, #11, #15, #17, #18, #20, #22, #27, #36, #37, # 38 and #190) resided on the secured unit. Review of an undated policy/procedure titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician of lab refusals for a resident. This affected one Resident (#29) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications during the investigation phase of the annual survey. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, major depressive disorder, hypertension, heart disease, gastroesophageal reflux (GERD), diarrhea, anemia, end stage renal disease, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact with rejection of care behaviors noted one to three days during the look back period. Review of Section G- Functional status revealed the resident required extensive two-person assistance with bed mobility, transfer, toileting, extensive one-person assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical record, observations, staff interview, review of facility incident log and review of facility policy the facility failed to implement their policies and procedures for residents with injuries of unknown origin. The facility failed to investigate and report to the state agency. This affected one Resident (#22) of one reviewed for accidents. Total census was 40. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22, revealed an admission date of 08/30/16. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, anxiety, major depressive disorder, dementia, drug induced subacute dyskinesia, obesity, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, bipolar, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/08/19, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfer, locomotion off unit, dressing and personal hygiene. Resident #22 required supervision for walking, locomotion on unit and eating.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical record, observations, staff interview, review of facility incident log and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was reported to the state agency. This affected one Resident (#22) of one reviewed for accidents. Total census was 40. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22, revealed an admission date of 08/30/16. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, anxiety, major depressive disorder, dementia, drug induced subacute dyskinesia, obesity, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, bipolar, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/08/19, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfer, locomotion off unit, dressing and personal hygiene. Resident #22 required supervision for walking, locomotion on unit and eating. Resident #22 was dependent for bathing. Review of a smoking assessment dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical record, observations, staff interview, review of facility incident log and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was investigated. This affected one Resident (#22) of one reviewed for accidents. Total census was 40. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22, revealed an admission date of 08/30/16. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, anxiety, major depressive disorder, dementia, drug induced subacute dyskinesia, obesity, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, bipolar, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/08/19, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfer, locomotion off unit, dressing and personal hygiene. Resident #22 required supervision for walking, locomotion on unit and eating. Resident #22 was dependent for bathing. Review of a smoking assessment dated [DATE], indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-21 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of a residents' discharge. This affected one (#20) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 40 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension, seizure disorder, manic depression, anxiety, psychotic disorder, schizophrenia and ileostomy. Review of Resident #20's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was severely impaired for cognitive daily decision making skills and required supervision to extensive assistance of staff with his activities of daily living. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #20 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE], 11/11/18 and 12/18/18. The facility provided the resident with bed hold notice but did not notify the Ombudsman of the discharges On 02/20/19 at 9:42 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop baseline care plan within the required 48 hour of admission. This affected one Resident (#29) of 13 reviewed during the investigation phase of the annual survey. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, major depressive disorder, hypertension, heart disease, gastroesphageal reflux (GERD), diarrhea, anemia, end stage renal disease, and anxiety disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Section G- Functional Assessment revealed Resident #29 required extensive two-person assistance with bed mobility, transfer, toileting, extensive one-person assistance with personal hygiene, locomotion, dressing, and supervision setup with eating. Review of Section O-Special Treatments revealed Resident #29…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide care conference/care planning quarterly for residents. This affected one Resident (#39) of one reviewed for care conferences/care planning during the investigation phase of the annual survey. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes, major depressive disorder, osteoarthritis, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia of left side, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set(MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, with no behaviors noted. Review of Section G-Functional Status revealed the resident required extensive two-person assistance with bed mobility, toileting, transfer, extensive one-person assistance with walking, locomotion, dressing, personal hygiene, and supervision and setup with eating. Review of section K-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of resident list and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure the residents environment was free from accident hazards. This affected one room (12) of 15 rooms on the secured lower level. room [ROOM NUMBER] had exposed wires. The facility identified 14 Residents (#3, #5, #8, #11, #15, #17, #18, #20, #22, #27, #36, #37, #38 and #190) as being cognitively impaired and ambulatory who resided on the secured lower level. Total census of facility was 40. Findings include: Observation on 02/21/19 at 10:25 AM, revealed exposed and uncapped wires sticking out from underneath the affixed heating unit located inside room. 12. Interview on 02/21/19 at 10:55 A.M. with Maintenance Director # 56, verified there were exposed, uncapped wires sticking out from underneath the affixed heating unit in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Review of resident list identified 14 Residents (#3, #5, #8, #11, #15, #17, #18, #20, #22, #27, #36, #37, #38 and #190) as being cognitively impaired and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of the narcotic logs, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a nurse documented in the narcotic log in a timely manner after administration of a narcotic. The facility also failed to ensure administration of a narcotic when it was signed out of the narcotic log. This affected two (#25 and #26) of 24 residents the facility identified as receiving medications from the medication cart on floor two. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Observation of the Team 1 and Team 2 medication carts on the second floor and staff interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #21 was conducted on 02/20/19 at 3:58 P.M. At the time of the observation a review of the narcotic logs revealed Resident #25's Alprazolam (anxiety medication) 0.5 milligram (mg) count sheet noted a count of nine tablets however there were only eight tablets noted in the packet. RN #21 stated he provided Resident #25 the alprazolam at 12:20 P.M. and forgot to sign it out on the narcotic log. RN #21 then signed the medication out on the log. Further review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to remove/dispose of discontinued medication. This affected one of three medication carts observed during the annual survey. This directly affected one Resident (#16) who had expired medications in the medication cart. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed a physician order dated 12/09/18 for Risperdal Solution, two times a day for dementia/behaviors mix with food or drink. Further review revealed the Risperdal Solution was discontinued on 12/26/18. Observation of the Team 2 medication cart on the second floor and staff interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #21 was conducted on 02/20/19 at 3:58 P.M. Observation revealed a bottle of liquid Risperdal Solution (antipsychotic) that belonged to Resident #16, noted in the side drawer of the medication cart. RN #21 stated the medication was discontinued and needed to be removed from the medication cart. Interview conducted on 02/21/19 at 1:53 P.M. Corporate Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-08-30 · tag F0574 — widespread
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and resident and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were provided the information needed to contact the Ohio Department of Health (ODH), the state survey agency. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The census was 27. Findings include: Observation on 08/24/21 at 11:25 A.M. with Activity Director (AD) #1 revealed the facility did not have information posted for residents regarding how to contact the ODH. Interview on 08/24/21 at 11:00 A.M. with Residents #2, #3, #11, and #20 confirmed the facility had not provided information on how to formally complain to and/or contact ODH. Interview on 08/24/21 at 11:25 A.M. with AD #1 confirmed the facility had not provided or posted information to the residents on how to formally complain to and/or contact ODH.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2019-02-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of nursing staffing schedules and staff interview the facility failed to have Registered Nursing (RN) services eight consecutive hours a day seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of the nursing staffing schedules from 01/19/19 through 02/19/19 revealed there was no RN scheduled for the following dates: 01/19/19, 01/20/19, 02/02/19, 02/03/19, 02/16/19 and 02/17/19. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 02/21/19 at 9:48 A.M., she verified only one floor nurse on staff was a RN. The DON stated she would pop in on the weekends at times to complete checks but generally she and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) generally only worked during the weekdays. The DON reported she and the ADON switch off every other weekend for on call but were not present in the building. The DON verified every other weekend on there is no RN scheduled. She also verified they do not have a waiver to allow for no RN coverage.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$36,185 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $36,185 — penalty dated 2024-05-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BUCKEYE OP CO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2021
BUCKEYE HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2021
OMG MSTR LSCO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2021
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
STOLTZ, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2021
WILHEIM, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2021
NEAR KNOLL MGT CO., LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
GROVES, DONNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
KAREV, MILLAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
WILLIAMS, BRIANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/11/2021
C.R. STOLTZ FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
C.R. STOLTZ IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
HEALTH CARE HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
I. ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
I. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
R.S. WILHEIM IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
RONALD S WILHEIM 2012 SPOUSAL TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
RRW, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
S.L. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
WILHEIM FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$615K
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 86%Medicare 0%Other / private 14%

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $615K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$290per resident / day
operating cost
$8,827per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$254per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366256. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next