Evergreen Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 69 beds and averages 42.6 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-01-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI), staff interviews, review of the local police report, review of the facility investigation, review of email and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #28) was free from physical abuse by facility staff. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious negative psychosocial harm, based on a reasonable person's response of fear and anxiety, for Resident #28, who has severe cognitive impairment, when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #431 physically walked Resident #28 back a couple steps to a wall, held her against the wall with her right forearm, and placed her left hand on the resident's throat in response to behaviors Resident #28 was exhibiting, causing Resident #28 to start screaming and crying. This affected one (#28) of four residents (#10, #20, #28, and #30) reviewed for abuse. There was a total of 17 residents (#28, #38, #20, #293, #143, #39, #8, #30, #10, #14, #1, #26, #27, #15, #25, #19, and #36) screened for abuse during the annual survey. The facility census was 44. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-01-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, review of the medical records, review of hospital records, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement fall interventions for one (#26). This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #26's bed was not placed in the low position, the resident fell out of bed and suffered a dislocated left little finger. This affected one (Resident #26) of four residents reviewed for falls. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure post-fall assessments were completed and falls were tracked on the facility's incident log. This affected three (#26, #244, and #245) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 10/04/22. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, history of falling, and oropharyngeal dysphagia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/08/22, revealed Resident #26 had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, review of recipe, and review of diet and nutrition manual the facility failed to serve pureed foods at a smooth consistency for safe swallowing. This had the potential to affect five (#3, #16, #20, #22, and #34) residents who the facility identified to require a pureed diet. The facility census was 44. Observation on 04/08/26 at 11:48 A.M. of the first pan of preprepared pureed ham revealed the pureed ham appeared chopped and was separated, not a smooth consistency. Observation of a test tray of the pureed ham revealed the pureed ham was not a smooth consistency.Interview on 04/08/26 at 11:50 A.M. with Dietary Manager #302 verified the first pan of pureed ham was not smooth. Observation on 04/08/26 at 11:55 A.M. of the second pan of preprepared pureed ham revealed the pureed ham appeared to be a smoother texture however there were clumps of what appeared to be ham rind. Interview on 04/08/26 at 11:56 A.M. with Dietary Manager #302 reported the two pans of pureed ham were prepared at the same time but heated separately. Dietary Manager #302…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, review of self-reported incidents, and review of facility policy the facility failed to report incidents of potential misappropriation. This affected one (#27) of one residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 44. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Type Two Diabetes Mellitus without complications, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, and lymphedema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated on 02/04/26, revealed the resident was cognitively intact.Interview on 04/07/26 at 2:16 P.M. with Resident #27 revealed his smart phone was stolen a few months ago. Resident #27 stated he believed it was stolen, not lost as he always left it on his bedside table. Resident #27 stated it was an iPhone 17. Resident #27 stated the police were not called to take report and he was not asked if he desired to make a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation. This affected one (#27) of one resident reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 44. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Type Two Diabetes Mellitus without complications, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, and lymphedema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/04/26, revealed the resident was cognitively intact.Interview on 04/07/26 at 2:16 P.M. with Resident #27 revealed his smart phone was stolen a few months ago. Resident #27 stated he believed it was stolen, not lost as he always left it on his bedside table. Resident #27 stated it was an iPhone 17. Resident #27 stated the police were not called to take report and he was not asked if he desired to make a report.Observation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received timely facial grooming. This affected one (#3) of three residents reviewed for the provision of activities of daily living in a facility census of 44. Findings include:Resident #3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including, dementia, anxiety disorder, pseudobulbar affect, major depressive disorder, hypertension, parkinson's disease, neurocognitive disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. According to the most current minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] Resident #3 was assessed with intact cognition, ability to make needs known, no resistive behavior, range of motion impairment to bilateral upper and lower extremities, required substantial to maximal assistance with activities of daily living, utilized a wheelchair for mobility. On 03/24/26 a nursing plan of care was revised to address Resident #3 activity of daily living (ADL)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pressure relief interventions were provided to promote wound healing and prevent further deterioration. This affected one (#31) of two residents reviewed with pressure ulcers in a facility. The census of 44. Findings include:Resident #31 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, morbid obesity, chronic respiratory failure, anxiety disorder, hypertension, dementia, chronic peripheral venous insufficiency, osteoarthritis, transient ischemic attack, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. According to the most current minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] Resident #31 was assessed with severe cognitive impairment, no resistive behaviors, range of motion impairment to upper and lower bilateral extremities, utilized a wheelchair propelled by staff, was dependent on staff for all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely incontinence care was provided to a dependent resident. This affected one, (#31) of two residents reviewed for incontinence care services in a facility census of 44. Findings include:Resident #31 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, morbid obesity, chronic respiratory failure, anxiety disorder, hypertension, dementia, chronic peripheral venous insufficiency, osteoarthritis, transient ischemic attack, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. According to the most current minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] Resident #31 was assesed with severe cognitive impairment, no resistive behaviors, range of motion impairment to upper and lower bilateral extremities, utilized a wheelchair propelled by staff, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and facility policy the facility failed to ensure adequate fluid was provided to dependent resident. This affected one of one residents (#31) reviewed for hydration in a facility census of 44. Findings include:Resident #31 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, chronic respiratory failure, anxiety disorder, hypertension, dementia, chronic peripheral venous insufficiency, osteoarthritis, transient ischemic attack, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. According to the most current minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #31 with severe cognitive impairment, no resistive behaviors, range of motion impairment to upper and lower bilateral extremities, utilized a wheelchair propelled by staff, dependent on staff for all activities of daily living including transfer and repositioning, always incontinent of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure timely follow-up for dental concerns. This affected one (#27) of one resident reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 44. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Type II Diabetes Mellitus without complications, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, and lymphedema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated on 02/04/26, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required set-up/clean-up assistance for oral hygiene. Resident #27 had obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. The MDS assessment, dated 02/03/25, also identified obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. Review of most recent care plan, verified Resident #27 had oral/dental problems. Interventions include to complete oral assessment upon admission and as needed, observe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions were followed as ordered by the physician. This affected one of two residents (#2) reviewed for implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions. The facility identified 14 current residents(#2, #7, #13, #20, #22, #24, #26, #29, #31, #32, #35, #43, #48, #50) placed in Enhanced Barrier Precautions.Findings include:1. Resident #2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including, neoplasm of bone, soft tissue, skin, and endocrine glands, malignant neoplasm of brain, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, paraplegia, hypertension, coronary artery disease, anxiety disorder, polyneuropathy, cauda equina syndrome and abdominal aortic aneurysm. According to the most current minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] Resident #2 was assessed with intact cognition, range of motion impairment to bilateral lower extremities, utilized…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy , the facility failed to follow physician orders to notify the physician when blood glucose readings were outside of specific parameters for two residents (#6, #246) and failed to notify the physician of urinalysis results for one (#243) resident. The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 11/12/20. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy and diabetic retinopathy without macular degeneration. Review of the physician orders dated 11/22/22 revealed an order for Novolog insulin as per sliding scale of blood glucose and if if below 80 or above 400 call the doctor. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for November and December 2022 revealed the blood glucose results were documented as being in the range the physician was to be notified (below 80 and above 400) on 11/23/22 at 11:00 A.M., on 11/24/22 at 4:00 P.M., on 11/28/22 at 11:00 A.M., on 11/29/22 at 11:00 A.M., on 11/30/22 at 11:00 A.M. 4:00…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH