Southbrook Healthcare Center
2299 S Yellow Springs Street, Springfield, OH 45506 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 98 certified beds · (937) 322-3436 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.4% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 94.3% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.2% | 3.2% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.7% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.9% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.2% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.9% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.0% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.9% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 50.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.71 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 81.5 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
THE FOLLOWING SURVEY FINDINGS PERTAIN TO INCIDENCE OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and monitoring for residents. This resulted in Actual Harm on 03/06/26 when Resident #12 rolled out of bed onto the floor during incontinence care, resulting in a fracture to his clavicle. This affected one (Resident #12) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 01/29/26 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, cerebral infarction, and type two diabetes. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #12 dated 03/13/26 revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the care plan for Resident #12 dated 01/29/26 revealed the resident required the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-05-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility policy, and review of online guidelines per the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), the facility failed to thoroughly assess resident skin and failed to identify pressure ulcers until they had reached an advanced stage. This resulted in Actual Harm for Resident #54 who was admitted to the facility with a pressure ulcer to his sacrum, left scapula, and right scapula and developed an additional pressure ulcer to his right gluteal fold which was not identified until it had developed into an unstageable ulcer with slough (nonviable tissue which could impede wound healing) and necrotic (dead) tissue. This affected one (Resident # 54) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 04/22/25 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, Alzheimer's Disease, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the pressure ulcer risk assessment for Resident #54 dated 04/22/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-27 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure annual evaluations were completed for staff. This had the potential to affect all of the residents who resided in the facility. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #120 revealed a hire date of 10/27/22 with no annual evaluation. Review of the personnel file for CNA #128 revealed a hire date of 08/15/23 with no annual evaluation. Review of the personnel file for CNA #117 revealed a hire date of 07/19/22 with no annual evaluation. Interview on 05/21/25 at 10:09 A.M. with Human Resource Manager (HRM) #153 confirmed annual evaluations were not completed for CNAs #120, #128, and #117.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility excluding Resident #52 and #62 who did not eat food from the kitchen. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: Observation on 05/18/25 from 08:22 A.M. to 8:52 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #201 revealed the following findings in the kitchen: -The dry storage area contained eleven undated cereal bowls, one container of breadcrumbs open to air, four clear plastic containers of cereal with cloudy sides and residue buildup, one clear plastic container of sugar with cloudy sides, one clear plastic container of flour with cloudy sides, one clear plastic container of brown sugar with cloudy sides, one unrefrigerated sheet cake, an uncovered trash can filled with waste. -The walk-in refrigerator contained two undated packages of salami, 20 undated individually wrapped dinner rolls, seven undated premade salads, 15 undated bowls of coleslaw, one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, financial record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to obtain appropriate written authorization to manage residents' personal funds. This affected two (Residents #23 and #24) of five residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 05/16/24 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hypotension and anxiety disorder. Review of the authorization form for the facility to manage resident funds for Resident #23 dated 05/30/24 revealed the resident's representative had signed to authorize the facility to manage the resident's funds, but the signature was not witnessed. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 04/23/25 with diagnoses including cerebral vascular accident, transient ischemic attack, dementia and anxiety disorder. Review of the authorization form for the facility to manage resident funds for Resident #84 dated 05/04/25 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure comfortable resident room temperatures. This affected one (Resident #48) of one resident reviewed for room temperatures. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 03/02/21 with diagnoses including epilepsy, depression, and a cerebral infarction. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #48 dated 04/02/25 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Observation on 05/18/25 at 11:06 A.M. of Resident #48 revealed the resident was in bed in her room and was covered with a thick blanket. Interview on 05/18/25 at 11:07 A.M. of Resident #48 confirmed the temperature in her room was too cold. Observation on 05/19/25 at 3:01 P.M. of the temperature in Resident #48's room with Maintenance Director (MD) #201 revealed the temperature of the resident's room was 68…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, review of the facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs) and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse. This affected three (Residents #15, # 59, and #69) of eight residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 04/12/23 with diagnoses of schizophrenia, congestive heart failure (CHF), and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #15 dated 03/18/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required set up assistance and supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the care plan for Resident #15 dated 03/25/25 revealed the resident had a focus on psychosocial well-being with a goal for the resident to feel safe, comfortable, and well cared for through next review date. Interview on 05/18/25 at 1:08 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #162 confirmed she witnessed Resident #63…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, review of the facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs) and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report allegations of resident to resident verbal abuse to the Ohio Department of Health (ODH). This affected three (Residents #15, # 59, and #69) of eight residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 04/12/23 with diagnoses of schizophrenia, congestive heart failure (CHF), and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #15 dated 03/18/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required set up assistance and supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the care plan for Resident #15 dated 03/25/25 revealed the resident had a focus on psychosocial well-being with a goal for the resident to feel safe, comfortable, and well cared for through next review date. Interview on 05/18/25 at 1:08 P.M. with Licensed Practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, review of the facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs) and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse. This affected three (Residents #15, # 59, and #69) of eight residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 04/12/23 with diagnoses of schizophrenia, congestive heart failure (CHF), and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #15 dated 03/18/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required set up assistance and supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the care plan for Resident #15 dated 03/25/25 revealed the resident had a focus on psychosocial well-being with a goal for the resident to feel safe, comfortable, and well cared for through next review date. Interview on 05/18/25 at 1:08 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #162 confirmed she witnessed Resident #63 call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, observation, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff provided timely resident incontinence care and failed to ensure staff provided resident nail care. This affected two (Residents #38 and #139) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 90 residents Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 08/24/18 with medical diagnoses including multiple sclerosis and glaucoma. Review of the care plan for Resident #38 dated 04/01/25 revealed the resident was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to incontinence. Interventions included to provide incontinence care as needed for the resident. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #38 dated 04/15/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and was dependent on staff assistance for incontinence care. Review of the task documentation for Resident #38 dated 05/16/25 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure range of motion devices were in place. This affected one (Resident #48) of two residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 03/02/21 with diagnoses including epilepsy, depression, and cerebral infarction. Review of the care plan for Resident #48 dated 03/22/25 for revealed the resident had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care deficit related to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the resident's right side with an intervention to place a rolled cloth in the resident's right hand as tolerated. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #48 dated 04/02/25 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff assistance with ADLs. Observations on 05/18/25 at 11:07 A.M. and on 05/20/25 at 8:24 A.M. and 11:30 A.M. of Resident #48 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received the appropriate level of supervision during transfer to prevent falls with injury. This affected one (Resident #61) of six residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 12/23/22 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the care plan for Resident #61 dated of 07/15/24 revealed the resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit and required assistance with ADLs with an intervention of two or more staff to assist the resident with bed mobility. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #61 dated 02/19/25 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs) including bed mobility. Review of the fall risk assessment for Resident #61 dated 04/09/25 revealed the resident was at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff followed safe hand hygiene practices during medication administration and handling of resident food. This affected two (Residents #32 and #55) of 26 sampled residents. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/18/25 at 8:56 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #154 revealed the nurse was preparing medications to administer to Resident #32. LPN #154 removed medication from Resident #32's medication dose pack and placed the medication in her ungloved hand before placing the medication into a medication cup. Interview on 05/18/25 at 8:57 A.M. with LPN #154 confirmed she touched Resident #32's medications with her ungloved hands. Review of facility policy titled Medication Administration dated 2013 revealed nurses should not touch medications with ungloved hands. 2. Observation on 05/19/25 at 12:06 P.M. of main dining room revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #110 served Resident #55 a turkey club sandwich with a packet of mayonnaise, a slice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of medical record, review of manufacturer insert, and review of facility reference guide the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors when staff failed to prime insulin pens prior to administration. This affected one (Resident #82) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Record review of Resident #82 revealed and admission date of 08/30/18 with pertinent diagnoses of multiple sclerosis, asthma, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, type two diabetes mellitus, cognitive communication deficit, anemia, convulsions, and chronic ischemic heart disease. Review of Resident #82's Physician Order dated 01/04/25 revealed Insulin Aspart FlexPen 100 units/milliliter solution pen-injector. Inject as per sliding scale: if 61 - 150 = 0 units no insulin; 151 - 200 = 3 units; 201 - 250 = 6 units; 251 -300 = 9 units; 301 - 350 = 12 units; 351 - 400 = 15 units; 401 - 500 = 20 units, subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for diabetes mellitus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of infections when they failed to use proper hand hygiene during a dressing change, and failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions. This affected one (Resident #74) of three Residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Record review of Resident #74 revealed an admission date of 10/02/24 with pertinent diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, encounter for gastrostomy, convulsions, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the 01/04/25 five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the Resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of a Physicians Order dated 01/20/25 revealed left heel-cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, apply medical grade honey, cover with silicone bordered super-absorbent dressing every night shift for wound care and as needed. Review of a Physicians…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow infection control precautions when providing wound care to a resident. This affected one (#2) of three residents reviewed for infection control. The census was 81. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/16/22. Diagnoses listed included atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease, osteoarthritis, depression, scoliosis, and and dysphagia. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was cognitively intact. Observation of left leg wound care on 09/19/14 at 10:36 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #100 removed a gauze dressing around Resident #2's left leg by cutting it with bandage scissors. RN #100 then laid bandage scissors on a bedside table. RN #100 then used the bandage scissors to cut a Xeroform (non-adherent wound dressing) to size before applying it to Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, review of self-reported incidents, and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency in a timely manner. This affected one (#79) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an admission date of 12/26/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/26/24, revealed Resident #79 was cognitively intact. Interview on 05/09/24 at 10:15 A.M. with Resident #79 revealed he reported an allegation of abuse on 04/11/24 to the Administrator related to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #203 sticking her finger in his face. Interview on 05/09/24 at 2:10 P.M. with LPN #203 verified Resident #79 did report to the Administrator an allegation of abuse, but stated the allegation was not true. Interview on 05/09/24 at 3:30 P.M. with the Administrator verified Resident #79…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of insulin pen manufacturer instructions, the facility failed to ensure a nurse primed an insulin pen prior to the administration of insulin, resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (Resident #11) of three observed for medication administration. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 06/08/23. Medical diagnoses included heart attack, depression, anxiety, type two Diabetes Mellitus, and sleep apnea. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating impaired cognition. Resident #11 required extensive two person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, toileting and supervision for eating. Review of the physician orders for Resident #11 revealed an order for Lispro 100 units per (/) milliliter ml. Inject as per sliding scale: if 70 to 199, zero units; 200 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-11-17 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of the staffing tool, review of staff punches, review of daily staff schedules, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked in the facility at least eight consecutive hours, seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all 66 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the staffing tool on 11/15/22 revealed on Sunday, 11/13/22, the facility did not have an RN on the schedule. Review of the staff punches for 11/13/22 confirmed no RN was working on 11/13/22. Review of the daily staff schedules for 11/13/22, confirmed no RN was scheduled for that day. Interview with the Administrator on 11/15/22 at 2:00 P.M. confirmed the facility did not have an RN available to work on 11/13/22.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of standardized recipes, review of facility pureed standards, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food recipes were followed and pureed foods were prepared appropriately. This had the potential to affect seven (#10, #20, #21, #23, #25, #35, and #270) out of seven residents identified by the facility as receiving pureed foods from the kitchen. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Observation and interview on 11/16/22 at 11:04 A.M. revealed [NAME] #253 added eight servings of peas to the food processor. [NAME] #253 then started the food processor and added a small amount of broth to the processor. [NAME] #253 stated she added a half teaspoon of broth for every eight ounces of peas. [NAME] #253 then removed the cover from the processor, stirred the contents, and stated she adds bread if needed to reach the desired consistency. [NAME] #253 added one slice of bread and pulsed the food processor. [NAME] #253 then poured the contents of the food processor, which appeared to have a liquid consistency, into a pan.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 03/20/18. Diagnoses included but were not limited to Parkinson's disease, diabetes, and osteoarthritis. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/10/22, revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact. Resident #23 required extensive assistance of one person for eating. Resident #23 had physical impairments of upper extremities on both sides. Resident #23 had loss of liquids/solids from mouth when eating and drinking, and was on a mechanically altered diet. Review of the plan of care, dated 09/19/22, revealed Resident #23 was dependent on staff for meeting activity of daily living needs with interventions including total dependence of one staff for eating at all meals and snacks. Resident #23 was at risk for nutritional problems with interventions including dys mech thin liquids, to provide assistance with meals as needed, provide meals according to the diet order, and provide speech and occupational therapy as needed. Review of Resident #23's physician orders dated 06/06/22 revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the beneficiary notice list, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) forms appropriately. This affected two (Residents #52 and #273) out of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The census was 66. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #273 revealed Resident #273 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to respiratory failure, muscle weakness, and diabetes. Review of the beneficiary notice list revealed Resident #273 was discharged from therapy on 10/05/22. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed Resident #52 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and femur fracture. Review of the beneficiary notice list revealed Resident #52 was discharged from therapy on 06/30/22. Interview on 11/16/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARRs) were completed as appropriate. This affected one (Resident #13) of four residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 07/30/20. Diagnoses included but were not limited to generalized idiopathic epilepsy, dementia without behavioral disturbance, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, major depressive disorder, malignant neoplasm of brain, and bipolar disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 08/19/22, revealed Resident #13 had severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed no evidence of a PASSAR having been completed since admission. Interview on 11/16/22 at 8:07 A.M., with Social Services Director (SSD) #236 verified there was no evidence a PASARR had been completed for Resident #13. SSD #236 stated Resident #13 admitted from another facility. Review of the facility policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARRs) were completed following changes to the resident's mental health diagnoses. This affected one (Resident #63) out of four residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 08/06/22. Diagnoses included but was not limited to cerebral infarction, anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder, other psychoactive substance dependence, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/04/22, revealed Resident #63 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident #63's most recent PASARR, completed on 08/04/22, revealed it did not include Resident #63's diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #63 received a new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder on 08/12/22. Interview on 11/16/22 at 8:09 A.M., with Social Services Director (SSD) #236 verified a new PASARR was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their responsible parties were routinely invited to participate in care planning. This affected one (#05) out of two residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the Resident #05's medical record revealed Resident #05 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to cerebral palsy, moderate intellectual disabilities, epilepsy, bipolar disorder, delusional disorders, and cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of unspecified cerebral artery. Review of Resident #05's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 11/08/22, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #05's care conferences from 11/14/21 to 11/14/22 revealed on 10/11/22, a care conference was conducted. There were no additional care conferences held between 11/14/21 and 11/14/22. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 03/20/18. Diagnoses included but were not limited to Parkinson's disease, diabetes, and osteoarthritis. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/10/22, revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact. Resident #23 required extensive assistance of one person for eating. Resident #23 had physical impairments of upper extremities on both sides. Resident #23 had loss of liquids/solids from mouth when eating and drinking, and was on a mechanically altered diet. Review of the plan of care, dated 09/19/22, revealed Resident #23 was dependent on staff for meeting activity of daily living needs with interventions including total dependence of one staff for eating at all meals and snacks. Resident #23 was at risk for nutritional problems with interventions including dys mech thin liquids, to provide assistance with meals as needed, provide meals according to the diet order, and provide speech and occupational therapy as needed. Review of Resident #23's physician orders dated 06/06/22 revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician addressed a resident's pharmacy recommendation in a timely manner. This affected one (#24) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to schizophrenia, unspecified dementia mild with other behavioral disturbance, and diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with other skin ulcer. Review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 11/04/22, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #24's physician order, dated 08/12/22, revealed Resident #24 was ordered Depakote (anticonvulsant) oral tablet delayed release 500 milligrams (mgs) give three tablets by mouth at bedtime for schizophrenia. Review of Resident #24's pharmacy recommendation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were ordered for a appopriate conditions. This affected one (#269) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #269 revealed Resident #269 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included sepsis, bactermia, bipolar disorder and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #269's physician orders dated 11/10/22 revealed orders for the following three psychotropic medications: Buspirone HCl oral tablet (antianxiety) 10 milligrams (MG) with instructions to give three times daily for mental/mood health. Lurasidone HCl ora tablet (antipsychotic) 80 MG with instructions to give one tablet at bedtime of mental/mood health. Trazodone HCl Oral tablet (antidepressant) 50 MG with instructions to give one tablet at bedtime for mental/mood health. Review of the care plan, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's Legionnaires prevention documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an adequate Legionella control plan with identified control measures. This had the potential to affect 82 of 82 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Water Management System Control Measure/Monitoring, revealed water temperatures would be checked weekly for temperatures form 105 Fahrenheit (F) to 120 F. Water heaters would also be visually inspected every six months to determine if interior cleaning was required and a water management team would meet quarterly. Review of facility documentation revealed water temperature checks were completed for hot water temperatures form 105 F to 120 F. An annual water quality check of city water was completed. However, there was no documentation of water heater inspections or quarterly water management team meetings provided. Interview with Maintenance Worker (MW) #231 on 12/19/19 at 4:10 P.M., revealed room water temperature checks were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-12-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of resident council minutes and facility policy, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to address resident concerns identified during Resident Council meetings. This affected five (#16, #27, #41, #63 and #73) of five residents interviewed for concerns and resolutions presented at resident council meetings. The facility census was 82. Finding include: Interviews on 12/19/19 from 11:08 A.M. to 12:00 P.M., with Residents (#16, #27, #41, #63 and #73) revealed several concerns were brought up continually to the facility and they stated the issues have not been resolved. All five residents stated they have asked the facility if a bathroom close to the center of the building where meals and activities are held, could be designated as a resident restroom, or a staff member could be available during activities to assist residents to the restroom when needed. All five resident also identified there were times when they had not received evening snacks. Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes dated 12/2018 through 11/2019, revealed multiple concerns were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately assess residents in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This affected three (#11, #33, and #132) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/09/18. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, depressive disorders, kidney failure, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of of physician orders revealed an order dated 09/13/19 for Depakene (Depakote) solution 250 milligrams (mg) per 5 milliliters (ml) give 10 ml via gastronomy tube three times a day for seizures. Review of physician documentation dated 09/24/19 revealed Resident #33 received Depakote three times a day for seizures. Review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 was not assessed as having a seizure disorder or epilepsy. Interview with the Corporate MDS nurse #235 on 12/18/19 at 1:55 P.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow a physician order for dialysis dressing removal. This affected one (#33) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The census was 82. Findings include: Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/09/18. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, depressive disorders, kidney failure, and dependence on renal dialysis. Resident #33 was assessed by staff as having moderate cognitive impairment in a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. Review of physician orders revealed and order dated 09/07/19 to take off dialysis dressing every other evening after dialysis treatment Tuesday/Thursday/Saturday. Review of treatment administration records (TAR) for December 2019 revealed the removal of Resident #33's dialysis dressing was documented as being completed on 12/17/19. Observation of Resident #33's right lower arm fistula on Wednesday 12/18/19 at 10:52 A.M. revealed a dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, medical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medications were administered and not left at bedside. This affected one (#55) of six residents observed during medication administration. The census was 82. Findings include: Review of Resident # 55's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/04/17. Diagnoses included: atherosclerosis of coronary artery, muscle weakness, chronic pain syndrome, congestive heart failure, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Resident #55 was assessed as being cognitively intact in a Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated Interview on 12/17/19 at 4:43 PM an interview with Resident #55 revealed she was experiencing back pain and was upset because the nurse wants her to take an anxiety pill for the pain. Resident #55 explained the nurses bring the anxiety pill to her at bedtime in a medicine cup. When the nurse leaves, she takes the pill out of the cup and wraps it in a tissue and throws it away in her bed side waste basket. Observation of the waste basket during the time of interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate diagnosis was obtained to justify the use of an anti-anxiety medication for one resident. This affected one (#55) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of Resident # 55's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/04/17 with no cognitive deficits noted. Diagnoses included atherosclerosis of coronary artery, coronary angioplasty, and chronic kidney disease. A care plan relative to medical and psychological needs revealed individualized interventions with measurable goals. Review of Resident #55's medication administration record revealed on 12/13/19, Resident #55 was prescribed and given Cymbalta Capsule Delayed Release Particles 30 mg 1 capsule by mouth daily at bedtime for anxiety. Review of Resident #55 nurses notes revealed no areas of concern with Resident #55 having anxiety. Review of the Medication Administration Records (MAR) from 12/01/19 to 12/18/19, revealed Resident #55 started the medication on 12/13/19, for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to document the administration of medications for three residents. This affected three (#2, #132, and #133) of seven residents reviewed for medications. The census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #2's record revealed an admission date of 08/19/19. Diagnoses included anemia, hypertension, muscle weakness, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the medication administration records (MAR's) for December 2019, revealed Resident #2 was not documented as receiving 9:00 P.M. doses of Trazodone 50 milligrams (mg), Baclofen 20 mg, and Ferrous Sulfate 325 mg on 12/11/19. Administration boxes for those times were blank and not completed on the MAR. 2. Review of Resident #132's record revealed an admission date of 12/05/19. Diagnoses included fracture of left leg, osteoporosis, cardiac pacemaker, and hypothyroidism. Review of the MAR's for December 2019, revealed Resident #132 was not documented as receiving a 9:00 P.M. dose of Simvastatin 40 mg on 12/11/19 and a 6:00 A.M. dose of Levothyroxine Sodium 100 micrograms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUCKEYE OP CO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/01/2021 |
| BUCKEYE HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2021 |
| OMG MSTR LSCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2021 |
| ROMEO, DOMINIC | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2023 |
| STOLTZ, CHARLES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| WILHEIM, RONALD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| YELLOW MGT CO., LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/07/2025 |
| FERGUSON, HAROLD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| GROVES, DONNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| KING, ELAINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/20/2023 |
| ODENTHAL, RICHARD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/25/2025 |
| C.R. STOLTZ FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| C.R. STOLTZ IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| HEALTH CARE HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| I. ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| I. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| R.S. WILHEIM IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| RONALD S WILHEIM 2012 SPOUSAL TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| RRW, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| S.L. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| WILHEIM FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365424. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.