No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Grande Lake Healthcare Center

1209 Indiana Avenue, St Marys, OH 45885 · For profit - Corporation · 45 certified beds · (419) 394-7611 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (419) 394-7611 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0603) — cited Jan 20201 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0603), cited Jan 2020
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1010 Hager St · (419) 394-2610 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.5 mi
1502 Executive Dr · (419) 394-3542 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1550 Celina Rd · (419) 394-4015 · Call to confirm hours
Park
101 S Chestnut St · (419) 394-3303 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1130 W Indiana Ave · (419) 394-5711

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.0%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.7%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms16.4%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury8.0%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.9%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.2%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%3.4%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.9%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table0.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.1%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.2%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.5%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.781.731.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.701.801.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 6.8–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge28.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
1.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.81
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.22
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
43.2%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 43.4 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-27)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2023-02-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital documentation, staff interview, nurse practitioner interview, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, the facility failed to ensure medication orders for treatment of Influenza (Flu) Type A were timely initiated for a resident which caused a significant medication error. Actual harm occurred to Resident #13 when the resident exhibited a change in condition, tested positive for Influenza Type A, and was evaluated by a nurse practitioner who recommended the implementation of an antiviral medication which was not ordered timely or administered. This resulted in Resident #13 becoming difficult to arouse and responded only to painful stimuli. Resident #13 required hospitalization and was diagnosed with renal insufficiency, hypoxia, and pneumonia. This affected one (#13) of three residents reviewed for Influenza Type A infections. The census was 41. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of infection control tracking documents, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control monitoring was timely and accurately maintained during an active influenza outbreak and failed to ensure a urinary catheter was maintained in a manner to prevent infection. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility. The census was 41. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's infection control surveillance tracking revealed the document was not completed for February 2025. Interview on 02/26/25 at 124 P.M. with Infection Preventionist (IP) #417 acknowledged the facility was in an influenza outbreak and the method the facility utilized to track the infections was not updated for February 2025. IP #417 stated an employee was the first person to test positive for influenza on 02/11/25 and the next positive test was a resident on 02/13/25. IP #417 was not able to provide tracking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter collection bags were covered to maintain dignity. This affected one (#195) of four residents reviewed for respect and dignity. The census was 41. Findings included: Review of Resident #195's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertension, lymphedema, and cellulitis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #195 was cognitively intact and admitted with indwelling urinary catheter. Observation of Resident #195 on 02/24/25 at 11:39 A.M. revealed the resident had no cover in place on the urinary catheter collection bag. Interview with Certified Nurse Aide (#704) verified Resident #195's urinary catheter collection bag did not have a cover to maintain dignity at the time of the observation. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00160883.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to determine if residents were clinically appropriate to self-administer their medications. This affected two (#7 and #10) of four residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 41. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 11/14/23 with diagnoses including type two diabetes, chronic kidney failure, bipolar disorder, long term (current) drug therapy, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was cognitively intact and required setup or clean-up assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of Resident #7's current physician orders revealed no order for self-administration of medication. Review of Resident #7's care plan dated 02/21/25 revealed no care plan for self-administration of medications. Review of assessments revealed no self-administration of medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide privacy during a mechanical lift transfer. This affected one (#27) of one residents reviewed for privacy. The census was 41. Findings included: Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of myocardial infarction, dysphagia, Alzheimer's disease, and depression. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 was cognitively impaired, had limited range of motion with the upper and lower extremities, and was wheelchair bound. Review of Resident #27's current plan of care revealed Resident #27 was to be transferred by a mechanical (Hoyer) lift at all times and was dependent with all care using one to two helpers. Observation on 02/24/25 at 11:11 A.M. revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #604 and CNA #704 were inside Resident #27's room with the door open while placing a Hoyer lift sling under the resident.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided assistive drinking devices as care planned. This affected one (#15) of one residents reviewed for assisted eating devices. The census was 41. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, contracture of the right hip, contracture of the left hip, diabetes mellitus type II, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and left hand pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 was cognitively impaired required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), and had frequent pain. Review of a care plan dated 12/03/24 revealed Resident #15 had a potential for altered nutrition and had interventions for build up utensils for eating and a Kennedy cup (a lightweight, spill-proof drinking cup) for liquids at bedside table…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of arbitration agreements, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure arbitration agreements were explained and presented to residents with appropriate cognition to understand the document content. This affected one (#145) of four residents reviewed for arbitration agreements. The census was 41. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #145 revealed an admission date of 02/06/25 with diagnoses including moderate dementia with agitation, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, legal blindness, bilateral unspecified hearing loss, heart failure, cognitive communication deficit, and unspecified hearing loss bilateral. Review of a previous admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed 12/16/24 while Resident #145 in a different facility, the resident was assessed with severe cognitive impairment. Review of an arbitration agreement document revealed the parties understand, acknowledge, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were completed as required. This affected two (#15 and #48) of three residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 42. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was initially admitted on [DATE], discharged on 01/26/24, and was readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, type two diabetes mellitus, colostomy status, gastrostomy status, pressure ulcer of sacral region (stage 3), anxiety disorder, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of care conference progress notes revealed Resident #15 care conference were completed on 02/15/24, 02/16/24, 04/10/24, and 06/27/24. There was no care conference completed in January when the resident admitted . 2. Review of the medical record review revealed Resident #48 was admitted on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespread
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, review of the activity calendar, review of activity documentation, resident council meeting minutes, and review of policy, the facility failed to provide sufficient and quality activities to meet the needs of residents. This affected seven (#5, #15, #18, #22, #23, #29, and #30) of seven residents reviewed for activities with the potential to affect all residents the facility. The facility census was 36. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #5 revealed admission of 07/10/19 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, hypertension, and dementia. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/15/23, revealed Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of six which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident required extensive assist of one for transfers. Resident independent for activities of daily living. Review of activity preferences interview,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-13 · tag F0680 — widespread
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of activity calendars, review of resident council minutes, review of personnel file and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. This had the potential to affect 36 of 36 residents in the facility. Findings include: Observations on 02/06/23 to 02/09/23 over various times throughout the group survey, revealed only one activity was scheduled and offered at 1:30 P.M. No other group activities were observed being offered to meet the needs and desires of the residents. Review of the activity calendars, dated September 2022 through February 2023, revealed one activity is scheduled once per day at 1:30 P.M. The offered activity examples included resident council, games (bingo, uno, music trivia, dominoes), food (cream puff day, peppermint stick ice cream, popcorn day, muffin day, make your own pizza, pancakes, donut day), birthday party, spa day, and crafts . Every other weekend Saturday was scheduled for music and games and Sunday was scheduled for movie and games. Review of special notes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-13 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were complete and accurate. This affected four (#1, #17, #26, and #28) of 16 residents reviewed for accurate assessments. The facility census was 36. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 09/22/22 and a readmission date of 11/01/22, with diagnoses of respiratory failure with hypoxia, morbid obesity, pain to lower extremities, dementia, congestive heart failure, and stage IV chronic kidney disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed staff determined a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment for Resident #1 should be conducted. The BIMS assessment included seven questions. Review of the BIMS assessment for Resident #1 revealed four questions were completed, and the final three questions were marked not assessed. This resulted in a score of 99 indicating Resident #1 was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff, resident, and resident representative interviews, and policy review; the facility failed to conducted care conferences. This affected two (#18 and #26) of two resident reviewed for care planning. The census was 36. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an initial admission date of 10/27/21, with re-entry admission on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #18 included: altered mental status, muscle weakness, acute kidney failure, Parkinson's disease, dysphagia oropharyngeal phase, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, hypercalcemia, and major depressive disorder recurrent severe with psychotic symptoms. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/15/22, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the medical record, dated since 06/08/22 to date of survey, revealed no evidence of a care conferences being held. Interview on 02/06/23 at 2:39 P.M., with Resident #18's Representative verified they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the care and services for daily use of alcohol. This affected one (#17) of one resident reviewed for alcohol. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #17 revealed admission of 01/25/20, with diagnoses including unspecified convulsions, anxiety, insomnia, depression, migraine, atrial fibrillation, cerebral infarction with right sided hemiparesis/hemiplegia, and expressive language disorder. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], for Resident #17 revealed the mental status was unable to be assessed. Staff interviews revealed the resident independent for daily decision making. Resident #17 was assessed as independent for activities of daily living. Observation on 02/06/23 at 11:30 A.M., revealed two [NAME] Lite cans on over the bed table. One can noted to be open. Interview on 02/06/23 at 12:53 P.M., with Resident #17…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of the policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for a resident at risk for falls. This affected one (#20) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 12/19/22, with medical diagnoses of unspecified dementia, acute on chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, morbid obesity, weakness, pain in lower extremities, and cerebral infarction. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and hygiene, and required supervision with one person assist for eating. Further review revealed Resident #20 fell two or more times without injury since the previous assessment. Review of a physician order dated 01/16/23 revealed Resident #20 needed a low bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding tube feed administration. This affected one (#138) of one resident reviewed for tube feed. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #138 revealed admission of 02/01/23, with diagnoses of fusion of spine cervical region, spinal stenosis, unspecified cord compression, cerebral palsy, dysphagia, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, hypothyroidism, aphasia, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, and anxiety. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #138 revealed resident is rarely/never understood. Staff interview revealed resident is independent for daily decision making skills. Review of physician order dated 02/08/23 for Resident #138 revealed nepro at 45 milliliters (ml) per hour for 20 hours a day, off at 8:00 A.M. and on at 12:00 P.M. Observation on 02/08/23 at 3:04 P.M. of Resident #138…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide rationale for gradual dose reduction (GDR) not indicated. This affected one (#21) of five residents reviewed for GDR's. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #21 admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's with early onset, dementia, hypertension, adult failure to thrive, depression, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], for Resident #21 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #21 was independent for activities of daily living. Review of the form titled: CommuniCare: Psychotropic Medication Evaluation (Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee), dated 02/09/22, for Resident #21 revealed GDR not indicated at this time, due since (pick one, note rational below). No rationale listed on GDR form. Review of the form titled: CommuniCare:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to administer medications per physician order. This affected one (#25) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #25 revealed admission date 09/22/21, with diagnoses including wernicke's encephalopathy, unspecified mood disorder, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and cognitive communication disorder. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #25 revealed a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated cognitively intact. Observation on 02/07/23 at 7:34 A.M., during medication pass with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #632 revealed the nurse administered Seroquel 50 milligrams (mg) and Seroquel 25 mg to Resident #25. Review of physician order dated 02/02/23 for Resident #25 revealed discontinue previous Seroquel order. Start Seroquel 25 mg by mouth twice daily for five days then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was seen by a dentist timely. This affected one (Resident #23) of one resident reviewed for dental concerns. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere severe with agitation, essential (primary) hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, acute kidney failure, acute kidney failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/09/22, revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the care plan, dated 12/08/22, revealed the care plan was silent for dental needs. Review of the nurse's progress note, dated 09/17/22, revealed Resident #23 reported that while he was eating an apple four to five of his top teeth fell out. Resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-01-04 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of a snack sign out sheet, observations, staff and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received substantial bedtime snacks due to the time span of greater than 14 hours between the dinner meal and breakfast. The facility identified all 31 residents residing in the facility who received food from the kitchen. Facility census was 31. Findings include: Review of bedtime snack sign out sheets dated 10/1/19 through 1/03/20 revealed bed time snacks were documented as not passed on 11/01/19, 11/03/19, 11/04/19, 11/07/19, 11/10/19, 11/17/19, 11/20/19, 11/23/19, 11/24/19, 11/25/19 and 12/01/19. 12/10/19, 12/12/19, 12/14/19, 12/23/19, 12/25/19 and 12/26/19. Review of morning meeting notes dated 12/06/19, 12/15/19, 12/31/19 and 01/02/20 revealed Dietary Manager #420 had informed management during the morning meeting of bedtime snacks not being provided to residents. Interview with four residents (#3, #4, #24 and #27) during the resident council meeting on 01/03/20 at 10:04 A.M. revealed they did not receive bedtime snacks on a routine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on documentation/record review, staff interview and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to establish and implement specific testing protocols for their water management program through the Legionella policy and procedure. This had the potential to affect all 31 residents residing in the facility. Facility census was 31. Findings include: Review facility Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) toolkit risk assessment for Legionella undated documented the facility was at increased risk for Legionella growth and spread. Further review documented the facility needed a water management program for the buildings hot and cold water distribution system. Review of CDC toolkit assessment for Legionella last revised 06/05/17 documented control measures should be applied where there are hazardous conditions for Legionella to possibly grow. Review of the facility Legionella policy and procedure revised 11/18/19 documented Water Management Plan documented the Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) only requires the facility to consider the CDC toolkit and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-04 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — pattern
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from involuntary seclusion when the facility used a coded secure entrance/exit door at the main entrance of the facility without providing the code to resident's who were cognitively intact, alert, oriented and independently mobile. This affected four (#4, #2, #10, #3) of four residents reviewed for involuntary seclusion. The facility identified 12 (#28, #9, #31, #15, #12, #25, #24, #27, #18, #26, #30 and #29) additional residents who were cognitively intact, alert, oriented and independently mobile who could potentially be affected by the secured entrance/exit door. The facility census was 31. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include coronary artery disease, depression, anxiety, mild cognitive impairment, obesity, urinary incontinence, symbolic dysfunction, weakness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident's were offer and administer the influenza and pneumococcal vaccine. This affected five (#6, #11, #84, #7 and #33) out f five residents reviewed for immunizations in the infection control task. The facility census was 31. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney failure, congestive heart failure, hypertension, anemia and Stage IV pressure ulcer to the sacrum. Review of the resident's immunization record revealed no evidence the resident had been offered or received the pneumonia vaccine. 2. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to he facility on 10/07/19 and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes type II, hypertension, gastro esophageal reflux…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to arrange appropriate transportation to a wound clinic for one resident (#11) of three residents reviewed for pressure and non pressure ulcers. The facility census was 31. Findings include: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission of 12/15/19. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes type II, hypertension, gastro esophageal reflux disease, hypothyroidism, atrial fibrillation, major depression , urine retention, and morbid obesity. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 14 out of 15 revealing no cognitive deficits. He required extensive assist of two staff for bed mobility and toileting. The resident did not transfer or ambulate. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/07/19, revealed the resident scored a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS assessment indicating no cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-04 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) included the explanation of estimated cost. This affected two (#19 and #31) out of three residents review for beneficiary protection notification. The facility census was 31. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 10/21/19 with diagnosis including acute kidney failure, tachycardia, iron deficiency, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, hypothyroidism and muscle weakness. Review of physician order dated 11/18/19 Resident #19 documented physical therapy recertification complete for five time a week for one week to address therapy active training, gait training and patient caregiver education. Review of SNFABN documented Physical Therapy services were to end on 11/23/19. Resident #19 refused to sign the notice on 11/20/19. Resident #19 wasn't informed of the estimated cost as part of the SNFABN notification requirements. 2. Review of medical record for Resident #31 revealed and admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-04 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided written notification of transfer upon transfer from the facility. This affected one (#11) of five residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 31. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to he facility on 10/07/19. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes type II, hypertension, gastro esophageal reflux disease, hypothyroidism, atrial fibrillation, major depression, urine retention and morbid obesity. Further review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital and hospitalized on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #11 was admitted to the hospital again on 12/08/19 and readmitted [DATE]. Review of the medical record revealed no reason for the transfers to the hospital on [DATE] and 12/08/19 given to resident and representative in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-04 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Discharge-return not anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed and submitted within 14 days to Center for Medicare & Medicare Services (CMS) database. This affected one (#1) out of one resident reviewed for resident assessments based on information submitted to CMS. The facility census was 31. Findings include: Review of closed medical record documented Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including hypothyroidism, hypertension, history of falls, hyperlipidemia, constipation, atrial fibrillation and muscle weakness. Review of census record documented Resident #1 was discharge from the facility on 09/29/19 and moved to the assisted living in the same building. Review of discharge-return not anticipated MDS for Resident #1 dated 09/29/19 was not completed until 01/02/19 and was not submitted to the CMS database until 01/03/19. On 01/03/20 at 10:15 A.M. an interview with MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff, resident and family interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and responsible parties were provided personalized care planning conferences on admission and on a quarterly basis. This affected two (#2 and #21) of two residents reviewed for care planning. Facility census was 31. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include non displaced trimalleolar fracture ( fracture of the ankle including the ankle bone and the lower part of the tibial bone) of left lower leg, morbid obesity, right heart failure, depression, diabetes mellitus type II, diabetic neuropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, persistent mood disorder, ischemic heart disease, urine retention, neurogenic dysfunction of bladder, bipolar, hyperlipidemia, hypertension and anxiety. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to assess and implement interventions for a resident who was exhibiting exit seeking behaviors. Additionally, the facility failed to implement physician orders fall interventions for a resident at risk for falling. This affected two (#33 and #7) out of three residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility census was 31. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia and asthma. Review of the nursing admission Assessment, dated 12/09/19 revealed there was on documentation indicating if the resident was at risk elopement risk. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/12/19, revealed the resident scored a four out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating the resident has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered pre and post dialysis evaluations were completed. This affected one (#16) out of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified two resident currently receiving dialysis treatment. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 11/14/19 with diagnosis including diabetes type two, obesity, and stage renal disease, anemia, fluid volume overload, atrial fibrillation, dependency on renal dialysis, non compliance with renal dialysis, liver disease, hypertension and congestive heart failure. Review of physician order dated 11/14/19 documented Resident #16 is to receive dialysis treatment on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #16 was cognitively intact and currently received dialysis treatment. Review of comprehensive care plan for dialysis documented an intervention…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record, and staff interview, the facility failed to administer Coumadin (anticoagulant) as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#7) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 31. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, poly arthritis and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/09/19, revealed the resident scored an eight out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident received, insulin, antianxiety, diuretic and anticoagulant medication all seven days of the assessment. Review of the plan of care, dated 10/25/19 documented the resident was at risk for abnormal bleeding or hemorrhage due to anticoagulant use related to atrial fibrillation. The goal stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure monthly medication reviews were completed for Resident #7 and failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were followed up on for Resident #3. This affected two (#7 and #3) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 31. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, poly arthritis and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/09/19, revealed the resident scored an eight out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. The assessment stated the resident received, insulin, antianxiety, diuretic and anticoagulant medication all seven days of the assessment. Review for the monthly pharmacy visits revealed there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-04 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of the results of a urine culture and sensitivity resulting in the use antibiotic which the organism was not sensitive to. This affected one (#6) of five residents laboratory results reviewed during review of unnecessary medications. The facility census was 31. Findings include: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney failure, congestive heart failure, hypertension, anemia and Stage IV pressure ulcer to the sacrum. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/09/19, revealed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was an eight out 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers. He is no ambulatory and no longer propels his wheelchair on or off the unit. He has a suprapubic catheter in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-04 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to implement antibiotic stewardship policy to ensure a resident received optimal antibiotic therapy. This affected one (#6) out of five resident reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census as 31. Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney failure, congestive heart failure, hypertension, anemia and Stage IV pressure ulcer to the sacrum. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/09/19, revealed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was an eight out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers. He is no ambulatory and no longer propels his wheelchair on or off the unit. He has a suprapubic catheter in place He is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Allen View Healthcare CenterSpringfield, OH 1 of 5Annandale Healthcare CenterAnnandale, VA 1 of 5Canfield Healthcare CenterYoungstown, OH 1 of 5Dixon Healthcare CenterWintersville, OH 1 of 5Holbrook Healthcare CenterBuckhannon, WV 1 of 5Mount Vernon Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 1 of 5Southwood Healthcare CenterTerre Haute, IN 1 of 5Summers Healthcare CenterHinton, WV 1 of 5Valley View Healthcare CenterElkhart, IN 2 of 5Allison Pointe Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Battlefield Park Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Beckley Healthcare CenterBeckley, WV 2 of 5Belmont Healthcare CenterBelmont, WV 2 of 5Berkeley Springs Healthcare CenterBerkeley Springs, WV 2 of 5Cedars Healthcare CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Columbus Healthcare CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Crestwood Care CenterShelby, OH 2 of 5Cumberland Healthcare CenterCumberland, MD 2 of 5Eagle Pointe Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Ellicott City Healthcare CenterEllicott City, MD 2 of 5Evergreen Crossing And The LoftsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Grande Pointe Healthcare CommuRichmond Heights, OH 2 of 5Great Lakes Healthcare CenterDyer, IN 2 of 5Greenbrier Health CenterParma Heights, OH 2 of 5Hagerstown Healthcare CenterHagerstown, MD 2 of 5Hanover Healthcare CenterMassillon, OH 2 of 5Holly Hill Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Keyser Healthcare CenterKeyser, WV 2 of 5Mercer Healthcare CenterBluefield, WV 2 of 5Morgantown Healthcare CenterMorgantown, WV 2 of 5Mount Airy Nursing and Rehab CenterMount Airy, MD 2 of 5Petersburg Healthcare CenterPetersburg, VA 2 of 5Riverside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 2 of 5Rolling Hills Healthcare CenterNew Albany, IN 2 of 5Salem West Healthcare CenterSalem, OH 2 of 5Wedgewood Healthcare CenterClarksville, IN 2 of 5Westminster Rehabilitation and Wellness CenterWestminster, MD 2 of 5Wildwood Healthcare CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Worthington Healthcare CenterParkersburg, WV 2 of 5Wyant Woods Healthcare CenterAkron, OH

Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SXCY MSTR LSCO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2022
HEALTH CARE LEASE FACILITIES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2018
SXCY HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2022
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
STOLTZ, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2018
WILHEIM, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2018
INDIANA MGT CO., LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
GROVES, DONNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
PEYTON, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/15/2025
TAYLOR, JANEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2021
C.R. STOLTZ FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
C.R. STOLTZ IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
I. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
R.S. WILHEIM IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
RONALD S WILHEIM 2012 SPOUSAL TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
RRW, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
S.L. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
SKILLED HC HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
WILHEIM FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-22.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$719K
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 56%Medicare 6%Other / private 38%

This home reported $719K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$295per resident / day
operating cost
$8,961per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$240per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365809. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next