The Colony Healthcare Center
563 Colony Park Drive, Tallmadge, OH 44278 · For profit - Corporation · 117 certified beds · (330) 630-9780 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.5% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.5% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.9% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 21.1% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.6% | 6.1% | 16.1% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 32.6% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.1% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.8% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.0% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.9% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
57.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 57.9%CMS range 39.6–76.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.8–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.15 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 109.6 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection control procedures while administering medications. This affected one resident (Resident #29) out of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 108.Findings include:Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/27/22 with diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus.Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 had intact cognition.Observation on 1/28/26 at 8:29 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #215 during medication administration revealed she did not perform hand hygiene before preparing eight medications for Resident #29. LPN #215 placed all medications in the medicine cup and administered them to Resident #29 without washing hands or using hand sanitizer.Interview on 01/28/26 at 8:47 A.M. with LPN #215 confirmed she did not perform hand hygiene before medication administration with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen and nursing unit refrigerator and microwave on unit D in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving food from the facility. The facility census was 108. Findings include:1. Observations during the initial tour of the kitchen on 07/28/25 from 9:04 A.M. through 9:22 A.M. revealed: The reach-in cooler at the end of the steamtable on the bottom inside of the door had dried, various splatters and food debris. The table next to the reach-in where the juice machine and toaster were located, the top shelf had various dried stains around the juice machine and on the wall behind it. The bottom shelf had dried red and brown stains where the boxes of juice and a black piece of machinery sat. The wall where the clean knives were hanging was dirty with various dried stains. The table across from the steam table where the steamer sat, observed on the second shelf where two wire baskets with several serving utensils and scoops with various…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent flies in the facility. This had the potential to affect all 108 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:Observation on 07/28/25 at 10:25 A.M. in Resident #94 and Resident #67's room revealed six flies on Resident #94 bed. Interview on 07/28/25 at 10:32 A.M. with Housekeeping #607 confirmed observation of flies in Resident #94 and Resident #67's room and said she was not sure why there were flies. Observation and interview on 07/28/25 at 10:35 A.M. in Resident #51's room revealed flies, and he said the flies got bad last week. Observation 07/28/25 at 10:41 A.M. in Resident #102's room revealed flies in the room. Observation on 07/29/25 at 2:46 P.M. revealed flies in room B9 and C7. Observation and interview on 07/29/25 at 2:50 P.M. with Resident #79 and Resident #7 revealed flies in their room. Resident #79 said there were lots of flies, and he held up an electric fly swatter he had. Interview on 07/29/25 at 2:54 P.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This affected six (Residents #2, #38, #67, #94, #102, and #116) of 108 residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 108. Findings include:1. Observation and interview on 07/31/25 at 11:31 A.M. in Residents #94 and #67's room revealed an unknown liquid on the bathroom floor around the toilet. The bathroom had a strong odor of urine. The flooring around toilet had a black stain around seal of toilet. The walls and ceiling of the bathroom had visible dirt and debris. The toilet was continuously running. Resident #94 stated the toilet was always running and the bathroom always smelled. Interview on 07/31/25 at 11:45 A.M. with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #583 confirmed unknown liquid on the floor and she stated Resident #67 urinates on the floor in the bathroom. Interview and observation on 07/31/25 at 12:10 P.M. with Maintenance Director #539 revealed Resident #67 urinates on the bathroom floor. He stated they have new tiles for the bathroom,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure intravenous antibiotics were administered according to physician orders for Resident #99. This affected one (Resident #99) of two residents reviewed for antibiotics. The facility census was 108. Findings include:Review of Resident #99's medical records revealed an admission date of 07/19/24. Diagnoses included Stage IV pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle. Slough may be present on some parts of the wound bed. Often include undermining and tunneling.) and osteomyelitis (bone infection). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #99 had intact cognition. Review of the care plan dated 07/22/25 revealed Resident #99 was receiving antibiotics for suppressive therapy related to osteomyelitis. Interventions included administering antibiotics per physician orders. Review of the physician orders for July 2025 revealed Resident #99 was ordered Piperacillin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the correct serving sizes were served for the pureed diet. This affected 10 (Residents #14, #33, #36, #64, #71, #82, #84, #86, #91, and #105) who received a pureed diet. The facility census was 108. Findings include:Observation on 07/30/25 at 11:17 A.M. of the tray line for lunch meal service revealed that pureed chicken was served using the #10 ivory handled scoop, and the pureed rice was served using the #12 green handled scoop. Review of the menu and diet guide sheet for lunch on 07/30/25 revealed pureed chicken should be served using the #8 scoop (grey handled scoop) and the pureed rice should be served using the #10 scoop (ivory handled scoop). Review of the disher and scoop size chart revealed the #8 scoop was a grey handled scoop that provided four ounces; the #10 scoop was an ivory handled scoop that provided 3.25 ounces; and the #12 scoop was a green handled scoop that provided 2.66 ounces. Interview on 07/30/25 at 12:45 P.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #700 verified the scoops used to serve the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication had a stop date for Residents #9 and #107. This affected two (Residents #9 and #107) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 108. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dementia, psychotic disorder with hallucinations, visual hallucinations, auditory hallucinations, delusional disorders, anxiety, major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, asthma, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, hyperlipidemia, iron deficiency anemia, adjustment disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, nightmare disorder, chest pain, obesity, osteoarthritis, vitamin d deficiency, and dysphagia. Review of the physician order dated 06/28/25 revealed active orders for Ativan oral tablet 0.5 milligrams (mg) (Lorazepam) (antianxiety) every six…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Residents #22, who was dependent on staff for personal hygiene, was provided adequate and timely nail care. This affected one (Resident #22) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 108. Findings include:Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic hemorrhage affecting right dominant side, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease without heart failure with stage five chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease (ESR), heart disease, anemia, dialysis, asthma, cirrhosis of liver, ascites, dysphagia, Barrett's esophagus without dysplasia, acute respiratory failure, acquired absence of stomach, anxiety disorder, type II diabetes and hypotension. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to identify maggots in Resident #5's wound. This affected one (Resident #5) of two residents reviewed for wound care. The facility failed to ensure blood pressure medication was administered according to physician orders for Resident #5. This affected one (Resident #5) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure Resident #54's chole drain dressing was performed according to physician orders. This affected one (Resident #54) of one resident observed for chole drain dressings. The facility census was 108. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #5's medical records revealed an admission date of 09/04/24. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia and diabetes. Review of the physician orders dated 05/06/25 through 05/16/25 revealed to cleanse Resident #5's toes on the right foot, apply betadine (antiseptic) in between toes daily and as needed. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure intravenous antibiotics were administered according to physician orders for Resident #99. This affected one (Resident #99) of two residents reviewed for antibiotics. The facility census was 108. Findings include:Review of Resident #99's medical records revealed an admission date of 07/19/24. Diagnoses included Stage IV pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle. Slough may be present on some parts of the wound bed. Often include undermining and tunneling.) and osteomyelitis (bone infection). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #99 had intact cognition. Review of the care plan dated 07/22/25 revealed Resident #99 was receiving antibiotics for suppressive therapy related to osteomyelitis. Interventions included administering antibiotics per physician orders. Review of the physician orders for July 2025 revealed Resident #99 was ordered Piperacillin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, self-reported incident (SRI) review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure staff treated Resident #109 with dignity and respect. This affected one resident (#109) out of three residents reviewed for abusive treatment in the facility. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, restlessness, depression, insomnia, malnutrition, asthma, anorexia, high blood pressure, kidney failure, spondylosis, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #109 had severe cognitive impairment, had behaviors including wandering and refusing care, and was independent with transfers and ambulation. Resident #109's plan of care initiated on 05/03/24 indicated a risk for falls related to impaired cognition related to diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #83's sponsor was notified of significant changes in Resident #83's condition. This affected one resident (#83) out of three residents reviewed for changes in condition. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #83 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral vascular disease, vascular dementia pulmonary disease, high blood pressure, atherosclerotic heart disease, hyperlipidemia, iron deficiency anemia major depressive disorder, insomnia, osteoporosis, diaphragmatic hernia, gastroesophageal reflux disease with esophageal obstruction. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #83 had a significant change in her ability to sit up from a lying down position and from sitting to standing. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated she was independent in the ability to sit up from a lying down position and from sitting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all medications were stored and labeled as required. This affected five (Residents #47, #48, #49, #50, #51) of 10 residents reviewed. Findings include: Observation on 03/14/24 at 7:37 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #216 had pre-poured medications for Residents #47, #48, #49, #50, #51. A drawer within the medication cart contained five medication cups each containing medications with the resident's name. There was no information regarding the names or strength of the medications in the cups. Interview with LPN #216, at the time of the observation, revealed the medications were pre-poured because he was required to be in the dining room from 7:30 A.M. to 9:00 A.M. to observe residents during breakfast and he had more than 30 residents to administer medications to after breakfast service was finished. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Medication Administration revealed medications were to be poured just prior to administrating to the resident.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained infection control standards when administering medications. This affected one (Resident #47) of five residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: Observation on 03/14/24 at 8:13 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #216 preparing medications to administer to Resident #47. LPN #216 popped medications from blister packs into his bare hand and then picked up medications that were dropped and put them into a medication cup to administer to Resident #47. An interview with LPN #216 at the time of the observation confirmed the observations. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Medication Administration revealed medications were not to be touched, either when opening a liquid or dose pack. Dropped medications were to be discarded.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-07 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility did not ensure the activity director was qualified to establish and provide a therapeutic activity program to meet the needs and interests of the resident population in the facility. This affected all 110 residents living in the facility. Findings include: Review of the employee file for Activity Director (AD) #805 revealed a hire date of 03/28/23 with a signed job description dated for 03/28/23. As stated in the Purpose/Belief statement the position of the AD establishes an activity program of wide variety for the residents, enhancing the resident's wellness, in harmony with the overall plan of care set forth by the health care team, and in accordance with state and federal regulations. This position plans, implements, supervises and supports all operations of the activities department. While focusing on delivery of quality care, the position must also manage the assigned resources. As listed in the Qualifications/Knowledge/Skills and Abilities section, the AD role requires either a bachelor's degree in therapeutic recreation or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-07 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff were competent to complete their duties. This had the potential to affect all 109 residents who received meals from the kitchen except one resident (Resident #98) who the facility identified as eating nothing by mouth. The census was 110. Findings include: Review of the staff on-boarding packets for all dietary staff hired within the last six months revealed three staff (Cook #818, Dietary Aide #819, and State Tested Nurse Aide [STNA] #869) answered the on-boarding quiz questions incorrectly despite the correct answers being listed immediately following the questions. On 10/16/23 at 8:42 A.M., observation of the kitchen revealed food was stored on the floor in the walk-in refrigerator, walk-in freezer, and dry storage. On 10/16/23 at 8:58 A.M., interview with Dietary Aide #824 stated new staff did not get the appropriate training to know how to put away food items after they were delivered to the facility. On 10/18/23 at 11:20 A.M., observation of the lunch meal tray line revealed four residents (#6,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, review of facility policy, and review of the Ohio Uniform Food Safety Code, the facility failed to ensure food items were stored at least six inches off the floor. This had the potential to affect all 109 residents who received food from the kitchen and excluded Resident #98 who received nothing by mouth. The census was 110. Findings include: On 10/16/23 at 8:42 A.M., observation of the kitchen revealed a crate containing 12 cartons of milk was on the floor of the walk-in refrigerator, one box of chopped spinach was on the floor of the walk-in freezer, and the following items were observed on the floor of the dry storage room: one box of pasta, one case containing 12 cans of tomato juice, one box of cranberry juice, one box containing 150 packets of hot cocoa mix, and one box containing three gallons of pancake and waffle syrup. On 10/16/23 at 8:58 A.M., interview with Dietary Aide #824 verified the multiple boxes of food items that were on the floor of the dry storage room. Dietary Aide #824 stated new staff did not get the appropriate training to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-07 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility administrator did not ensure a qualified activity director was hired to administer a therapeutic activity program to meet the needs and interests of the residents. This had the potential to affect all 110 residents living in the facility. Findings include: Review of the position description for the executive director, signed by the Administrator on 11/23/2020, revealed it was the Administrator's responsibility to provide leadership to all staff to ensure care standards were met in accordance with state and federal regulations and the highest degree of quality resident care was provided at all times. Review of the employee file for the Activity Director (AD) #805 revealed a hire date of 03/28/23 with a signed job description dated for 03/28/23. It was stated in the AD job description her direct report was the Administrator. As listed in the Qualifications/Knowledge/Skills and Abilities section the AD role required either a bachelor's degree in therapeutic recreation or related field or 90 hour course for activity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-07 · tag F0572 — patternGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the resident council meeting minutes and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication to residents about their various rights at the resident council meetings. This affected 15 residents (Residents #12, #17, #23, #51, #58, #62, #67, #70, #71, #76, #79, #85, #87, #103, and #362) of 15 residents present at the resident council meeting. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of the facility Resident Council Meeting minutes from January 2023 to October 2023 revealed there was not a new resident right reviewed at each meeting. Meetings conducted on 01/30/23 revealed they reviewed smoking rights. Meetings conducted on 02/24/23, 04/13/23, 05/18/23, 06/15/23, and 07/20/23 revealed they reviewed the right to have resident council meetings. Meetings conducted on 08/17/23, 09/21/23 and 10/05/23 revealed they did not review any resident rights during the council meetings. Interview on 10/17/23 at 4:15 P.M. with Activities Director (AD) #805 revealed she was unaware she was to review a different resident right at each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to provide therapeutic activities as scheduled on the activity calendar and failed to provide evening activities to meet the needs and preferences of all the residents in the facility. This affected 15 residents (#12, #17, #23, #51, #58, #62, #67, #70, #71, #76, #79, #85, #87, #103, and #362) residing on the A,B and C units and had the potential to affect all residents residing on the A, B, C units excluding Residents #16, #41, #264, #80, #2, #77, #45, #39, #66, #15, #42, #74, #89, #38, #86, #35, #37, #90, #91, #69, #93, #92, #75, #97 and #6 who resided on the secured unit D. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of the facility activity calendars for October 2023 for the A, B, and C units, revealed on all 31 days in October 2023, the last activity was scheduled at 4:00 P.M., and no evening activities were offered during the month. The scheduled activities for 9:30 A.M. included coffee and chit chat. On Sunday the activity was listening to gospel music at 10:30 A.M. and church service and music…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, delusional disorder, anxiety, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and major depression. Review of the quarterly comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/04/23, revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and exhibited no behaviors. Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #80 was receiving an antipsychotic medication for a diagnosis of delusional disorder. Review of the August, September and October 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #80 for behavior monitoring revealed the resident had four days with behaviors in October, and no behaviors were exhibited in September or August. Review of the State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNA) behavior monitoring for Resident #80 for the past 30 days revealed the resident exhibited no behaviors. Review of the nursing progress notes revealed no behaviors were observed from August through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences were honored. This affected three residents (#14, #24, and #94) of five residents reviewed for food and nutrition. The census was 110. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 05/18/23 with diagnoses including type two diabetes, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the nutrition care plan, revised 08/10/23, revealed Resident #14 had the potential for altered nutrition status due to type two diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, lymphedema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, altered skin integrity, and therapeutic diet. Interventions included identify resident food and beverage preferences, and monitor meal intake, Review of the physician's orders for October 2023 identified orders for a controlled carbohydrate diet with regular texture and thin liquid consistency. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-07 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide snacks per resident preferences and the plan of care. This affected seven (#12, #51, #62, #67, #71, #79, and #85) of seven residents reviewed for snacks and had the potential to affect all residents (except Resident #98) residing in the facility. The census was 110. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 05/05/23 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, type two diabetes, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 08/31/23, revealed Resident #12 had intact cognition. Review of the nutrition care plan, revised 08/04/23, revealed Resident #12 had the potential for altered nutritional status due to end stage renal disease dependent on hemodialysis, type two diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypertension, fatty liver, congestive heart failure, obesity, anemia, diverticulosis,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility did not ensure the authorized parties were notified of changes in the resident's treatment for Resident #15 and Resident #19. This affected two residents (Residents #15 and #91) of 26 residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 110. Findings Include: 1. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia with anxiety, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, high blood pressure, and macular degeneration of the left eye. Resident #15's family member was listed as the authorized primary contact. Review of the quarterly comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the physician's orders revealed on 09/11/23 Resident #15 was started on Macrobid (an antibiotic) 100 milligrams (mg) twice a day for a urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of the nursing progress notes revealed no documentation the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurate. This affected two residents (Residents #15 and #40) of 26 residents reviewed for resident assessments. The facility census was 110. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical records revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia with anxiety, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, high blood pressure, and macular degeneration of the left eye. Review of the nursing progress notes for Resident #15 from admission through the present revealed on 09/06/23 the resident had increased confusion, wandering, exit seeking, agitation, and believed others were stealing her belongings. No other behaviors were documented. Review of the quarterly comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 was moderately cognitively impaired and exhibited the behavior of wandering for one to three days during the assessment period.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependant on staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) received the assistance needed with bathing and personal hygiene. This affected one resident (Resident #68) of two residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including alcohol-induced dementia, myoclonus, anorexia, osteoarthritis, and lack of coordination. Review of Resident #68's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed moderately impaired cognition with no signs or symptoms of delirium. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #68 was dependent for bathing and required one person assistance with locomotion, dressing, eating, toileting, personal hygiene. The MDS further revealed Resident #68 had no instances of rejecting care. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review and interview, the facility failed to properly assess and document skin concerns for Resident #363. This affected one resident (#363) out of five residents reviewed for skin concerns. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of the hospital discharge reconciliation report dated 12/12/22 revealed Resident #363 was ordered collagenase (removes damaged tissue from skin ulcers) to left planter foot daily and as needed with last administered date of 12/11/22 at 9:10 A.M. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #363 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 12/23/22 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, fracture of cervical vertebras, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus, end stage renal disease, sarcoidosis, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, and neurogenic bowel. A nurse note dated 12/16/22 at 6:11 P.M. revealed Resident #363 was admitted with no open skin areas and his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received hearing supports and devices in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#24) of one resident reviewed for hearing ancillary services. The census was 110. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 04/19/21 with diagnoses including alcohol dependence, schizoaffective disorder, emphysema, and post-traumatic osteoarthritis of his right hip. Review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact with minimum hearing difficulty. No hearing appliance was used in the conduction of this assessment. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #24 exhibited no behaviors and had no rejection of care. Review of Resident #24's care plan revealed he had difficulty hearing, had hearing aids, and did not always choose to wear his hearing aids. Interventions included ensuring hearing aids were in place, observing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation to identify and analyze hazards and risk factors for falls was conducted regarding falls for Resident #15, #94 and #102. This affected three residents (Resident #15, #94, and #102) of five residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 110. Findings include: 1. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia with anxiety, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, high blood pressure, and macular degeneration of the left eye. Review of the quarterly comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 was moderately cognitively impaired and had hallucinations and delusions. The resident was identified as having a fall with major injury. Review of the care plans for Resident #15 revealed the falls care plan was initiated on 08/28/23. The interventions implemented at that time included to assess fall risk on admission,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was obtained for oxygen administration. This affected one resident (Resident #54) of three residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility identified six other residents (Residents #13, #17, #34 #57, #67 and #79) identified by the facility as using oxygen therapy. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 05/10/22 with diagnoses including end stage kidney disease, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and arthritis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #54 was totally dependent on two people for transfers, required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, dressing and toilet use and extensive assistance of one person for hygiene. She did not receive oxygen therapy. Review of the physician's orders for October 2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was obtained for dialysis treatment for two residents (Residents #51 and #102) and that pre and post dialysis assessments were completed for Residents #40, #51 and #102. This affected three residents (#40, #51 and #102) of three residents reviewed for dialysis treatment. The facility census was 110. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease dependent on dialysis. Review of the comprehensive quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the physician's orders for October 2023 revealed Resident #40 received dialysis three days a week. Review of the pre and post dialysis assessments since admission revealed no pre-dialysis assessments were completed on 08/07/23, 08/11/23, 08/16/23, 08/21/23, 08/23/23, 08/28/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview, the facility failed to provide medication as ordered for Resident #363. This affected one (Resident #363) out of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #363 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 12/23/22 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, fracture of cervical vertebras, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus, end stage renal disease, sarcoidosis, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, and neurogenic bowel. Review of physician orders dated 12/16/23 at 8:20 P.M. revealed Resident #363 was ordered Oxycodone (narcotic for moderate to severe pain) 20 milligrams (mg) every six hours for pain and Oxycodone 20 mg every three hours as needed for pain. Review of medication administration note dated 12/17/22 at 2:59 P.M. revealed Oxycodone was not administered due to waiting on prescription for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure insulin was given per physician's orders. This affected one resident (Resident #362) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #362 revealed an admission date of 10/05/23 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia and diabetic neuropathy, morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation, pulmonary hypertension, depression, and cerebrovascular disease. Review of Resident #362's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had moderately impaired cognition. She was independent with eating and personal hygiene and required set-up or clean-up assistance with bathing and dressing her lower body. Mobility devices included a wheelchair and a walker, and she required supervision with transfers. Review of physician orders for Resident #362 revealed an order dated 10/06/23 for five units of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled in a manner that prevented the risk of residents receiving insulin that belonged to another resident. This affected one resident (Resident #362) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #362 revealed an admission date of 10/05/23 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia and diabetic neuropathy, morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation, pulmonary hypertension, depression, and cerebrovascular disease. Review of Resident #362's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had moderately impaired cognition. She was independent with eating and personal hygiene and required set-up or clean-up assistance with bathing and dressing her lower body. Mobility devices included a wheelchair and a walker, and she required supervision with transfers.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services to Resident #14, Resident #37, Resident #38, Resident #37, Resident #50, and Resident #57. This affected six (Resident #14, Resident #37, Resident #38, Resident #37, Resident #50, and Resident #) of six residents reviewed for restorative nursing programs. Findings include: 1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility and other intellectual disabilities. Resident #14's physician order dated 12/09/2020 revealed the resident was to receive skilled physical therapy (PT) services five times a week for four weeks, focusing on therapeutic exercise, therapeutic activity, mobility, transfers, gait, activity tolerance, safety awareness, falls prevention, and patient education. Review of Resident #14's Physical Therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a good prognosis to maintain his current level of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to accurately obtain, monitor and assess weight changes for Residents #22, #30, #44, #50 and #58. This affected five residents (Residents #22, #30, #44, #50 and #58) of seven residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings included: 1. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of psychosis, type II diabetes, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #44's quarterly comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment, had a mechanically altered diet, needed setup for eating, and had a weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or weight loss of 10% or more in last six months, and was on an unprescribed weight loss regimen. Review of Resident #44's weights revealed the resident sustained a weight loss between 01/01/2021 (179.5) and 02/01/2021 (148.2) of 31 pounds. This triggered a weight warning in the computerized charting and a re-weigh was request on 02/02/2021.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident narcotics on the controlled drug administration records were signed off in a timely manner for Resident #3, #22, #30, #50, #51, #63 and #68 and failed to ensure Resident #47 received diuretic medication as ordered. This affected seven residents (Resident #3, #22, #30, #50, #51, #63 and #68) of seven residents reviewed on the facility B hall for medication storage, and one resident (Resident #47) of five residents reviewed for medication. Findings include: 1. Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, cerebral infarction and diabetes mellitus II with diabetic nephropathy. Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 required supervision for all activities of daily living (ADL) and his cognition was intact. Resident #3's May 2021 physician orders revealed an order for Percocet tablet 10-325 milligram (mg), a pain medication every four hours for pain.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-03 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a restorative nursing program after reviewing it as a systemic problem at the Quality Assurance and Assessment meeting. This affected six residents (#14, #37, #38, #47, #50 and #57) of six residents who were identified by the facility as needing a restorative nursing program. Findings included: Record review was conducted of the facility document titled Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement Team Documentation, dated 04/14/2021. The identified problem was the restorative program. The goal was to develop a functional restorative program. The root causes for the lack of a restorative program were listed as COVID 19, not utilizing a process to enter restorative orders and write a restorative program, staffing challenges and not having a steady Director of Nursing since 12/25/2020. Interview was conducted on 05/25/2021 at 12:36 P.M. with Therapy Manager (TM) #765 who revealed there were currently six residents who were referred for restorative nursing programs (RNP) between 01/10/2020 and 04/16/2021 but there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure a family member visiting Resident #182 adhered to the proper use of personal protective equipment in a quarantine room for droplet isolation for potential COVID 19, and also failed to ensure clean hoyer pad straps were stored without the straps sitting on the floor. This affected one resident (Resident #182) of three residents reviewed for transmission based precautions and had the potential to affect all 15 of 15 residents (Resident #7, #13, #29, #32, #53, #55,#54,#61, #62, #63, #67, #180, #181, #182, and #184) who used hoyer pads. Findings included: 1. Record review was conducted for Resident #182 who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer dementia and unspecified psychosis. The resident resided on the A unit which the facility identified as the isolation unit for newly admitted or readmitted residents. An observation and interview was conducted on 05/18/2021 at 11:48 A.M. of Resident #182…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a food processor, used to make pureed foods, in proper working order. This had the potential to affect all 10 residents (#8, #10, #19, #20, #27, #40, #53, #54, #62 and #184) on a pureed diet. Findings included: Record review was conducted of the facility dinner menu for 05/19/2021. The main entree selection for the pureed diets included BBQ pork. A review of the pureed BBQ pork recipe showed a portion size was a half cup and the final product should be smooth. An observation was conducted with Culinary Director (CD) #704, District Manager (DM) #794 and [NAME] #738 on 05/19/21 from 2:49 P.M. to 3:47 P.M. of [NAME] #738 demonstrating how she prepared pureed BBQ pork for the dinner meal. [NAME] #738 used a seven quart Robo Coup R602Y Series E food processor to puree a premeasured amount of pork pieces in BBQ sauce she identified as being 13 half-cup portions. She dumped the entire amount into the Robo Coup and began blending the pork at 2:51 P.M. When asked by the surveyor what consistency she wanted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to update the plan of care for Resident #50 to establish an objective, measurable weight goal for a physician prescribed weight loss diet. This affected one (Resident #50) of seven residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings included: Record review was conducted for Resident #50 who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia following a stroke, unspecified convulsions, neuromuscular dysfunction, panic disorder, major depression, anxiety disorder and oropharyngeal dysphagia. Review of Resident#50's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers, total dependence of one person for toileting, set up only and supervision for eating and extensive assistance of one staff for hygiene. Resident #50's medical record showed an active physician order dated 12/22/2020 for a weekly weight. Review of the weight records…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-03 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bladder program was implement to restore Resident #1 bladder function to his base line. This affected one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for decline in activities of daily living (ADL). Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, and dementia with behavior disturbance. Resident #1's quarterly comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/29/20, revealed the resident required minimal assistance with toileting. Resident #1's annual comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 05/27/21, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired, and required extensive assistance with toileting. Interview on 05/19/2021 at 8:12 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #711 revealed the resident was incontinent of urine, and would urinate inappropriately on the floor.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient eating assistance to Resident #37. This affected one (Resident #37) of eight residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: Resident #37 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behaviors, visual function, psychotic disorder, depression, anxiety, anemia, incontinence, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Observation on 05/17/21 from 11:40 A.M. to 12:45 P.M. revealed Resident #37's meal was in a divided plate with a dinner roll in one of the smaller compartments, carrots and green peas in the other small compartment, and the main entrée of pork and mashed potatoes were in the large compartment. The resident ate everything on the right side of her plate and left everything on the left side uneaten. Resident #37 was scraping the bottom of the empty right side of the plate, totally ignoring the food on the left side as if it did not exist. She consumed 100% coffee which was also on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #43 smoked safely. This affected one (Resident #43) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards. Findings include: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #43's signed smoking contract, revealed on 12/15/20 the resident's son signed the facility's smoking policy. The resident smoking policy and standard procedures dated 04/01/16 revealed a supervised smoker is a resident that is unable to demonstrate safe smoking habits including smoking materials management, lighting, controlling cigarette ash and extinguishing smoking materials and requires staff supervision when smoking. Also, sharing, bartering, or selling smoking materials with others, including other residents is not permitted; non-compliance may result in a change to smoking status and/or discharged from the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-03 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #32 had bowls for all meals to assist with eating. This affected one resident (Resident #32) of seven residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease type 2 diabetes and dysphagia. Resident #32's quarterly comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident required extensive assistance with eating, that he held food in his mouth/cheeks or residual food in his mouth after meals. Review of Resident #32's physician orders dated 03/04/2021 revealed Patient needs food in individual bowls for every meal. Observation on 05/17/2021 at 11:40 A.M. and 4:10 P.M. Resident #32 was observed eating his lunch and his dinner meals off of a plate. Interview on 05/17/2021 at 4:17 P.M. with Therapy #765, Therapy #780, and Therapy #787 confirmed Resident #32 should have bowls with all of his meals. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-11-07 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) report, review of staffing schedules, review of the facility assessment and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate PBJ reporting. This had the potential to affect all 110 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing information for the second quarter of Fiscal Year 2023 (01/01/23 to 03/31/23) revealed the facility had excessively low weekend staffing and a one-star staff rating. Review of the facility assessment dated [DATE] through 10/30/23 revealed the facility would provide six to nine direct care nurses per day and 20 to 28 nurse aides per day. Review of the facility schedules for February and March 2023 revealed the following dates had less than 20 aides working: 02/10/23, 02/18/23, 03/24/23 and 03/25/23. Review of the daily posted staffing information for 02/01/23 through 03/31/23 revealed the following dates had less than 20 aides working: 03/19/23, 03/24/23 and 03/26/23. The daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SXCY MSTR LSCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/01/2018 |
| HEALTH CARE LEASE FACILITIES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2018 |
| SXCY HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2018 |
| ROMEO, DOMINIC | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2023 |
| STOLTZ, CHARLES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| WILHEIM, RONALD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| COLON MGT CO., LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| GROVES, DONNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| LEWIS, BILLIE JO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/19/2020 |
| SMITH, MARK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| C.R. STOLTZ FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| C.R. STOLTZ IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| I. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| R.S. WILHEIM IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| RONALD S WILHEIM 2012 SPOUSAL TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| RRW, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| S.L. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| SKILLED HC HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| WILHEIM FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365633. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.