E.a. Hawse Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 55.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a complete and accurate medical record for a resident in the areas of [NAME] Virginia POST Form, care plan, and PASSR. This is true for Resident's #4, #6, #9 and #17. Facility Census 54. Findings included: a) Resident #4 A record review completed on [DATE] of Resident #4's WV POST revealed the following: Section A. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Orders. Follow these orders if the patient has no pulse and is not breathing. Resident checked Yes CPR: Attempt Resuscitation, including mechanical ventilation. defibrillation and cardioversion. (Requires choosing Full Treatments in section B) Section B read as follows: Initial treatment orders. Follow these orders if the patient has a pulse and is breathing. Option not checked by the resident was Full Treatments (required if CPR is chosen in section A). Goal: Attempt to sustain life by all medically effective means. Option checked was second option Selective treatments. Goal: Attempt…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based upon observation, resident interviews, staff interviews and record review. the facility failed to maintain an effect pest control program for flies. This failed practice had the potential to affect many residents in the facility. Facility census: 54. Findings included: a) On 06/08/26, during the initial walk through of the facility and resident rooms, the following rooms had flies present: #A01#A03#A11#A12#A15#B04#B06#B10 The residents in these rooms complained about the flies bothering them. Additionally during the course of the survey, flies were observed in the B Hallway and Administration Conference Room. This finding was discussed with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 06/08/26 at 2:40 PM. The NHA stated the whole area around the nursing home has problems with flies because of the large chicken and turkey processing plants in the area. NHA immediately called their pest control contract agency and asked them to come. A follow-up conversation on 06/10/2026 at 11:43 AM with the NHA asked about the outcome of the call with the pest control company. She stated their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to inform the resident or their representative in advance of treatment risks and benefits, options, and alternatives for an anti-depressant medication prior to the administration of the medication. This failed practice did not allow the resident to be provided an informed choice. Resident identifier: #31. Facility census: 54.Findings included:a) Resident #31Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].The resident had the following diagnoses pertaining to mental illness:-DEPRESSION, UNSPECIFIED, 08/16/2024, Admission-ANXIETY DISORDER, 08/16/2024, Admission-MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, RECURRENT, MILD, 01/29/2026 During Stay-UNSPECIFIED DEMENTIA, UNSPECIFIED SEVERITY, WITHOUT BEHAVIORAL DISTURBANCE, PSYCHOTIC DISTURBANCE, MOOD DISTURBANCE, AND ANXIETY, 08/16/2024, AdmissionFor these diagnoses, the resident had the following orders:-Mirtazapine Oral Tablet 7.5 MG (Mirtazapine)Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for appetite stimulantPharmacy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive care plan was revised upon change in physician's orders in regards to a perimeter mattress. This is true for Resident #5. Facility Census: 54. Findings included: a) Reviewed the following documents on 06/10/26: Care plan for Resident #5, page 1. Focus-Resident #5 is at risk for falls r/t pain, limited physical functioning, requires assist with transferring. He has a history of falling at home. Resident also is non-compliant with assistance for transfers. He is observed to independently transfer and ambulate. Date Initiated: 02/07/2026 Revision on: 05/27/2026 Interventions included- Perimeter mattress to aide in identifying the edge of the bed. Date Initiated: 11/25/2025 Revision on: 01/14/2026 Review of physician orders for Resident #5 revealed no orders for perimeter mattress on 06/10/26. b) An interview with Resident #5 on 06/10/26 10:00 AM was conducted. Resident pointed out bruises on his arm and stated he depends on others to help him use his walker to walk up and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) on duty for 8 hours per day for seven days a week on 01/01/26. This failed practice had the opportunity to lead to residents not receiving the care and treatment only an RN can provide, and could affect multiple residents. Facility census: 54.Findings included: a) Record Review On 06/10/2026, the surveyor requested posted nurse staffing sheets as well as time detail for hours worked from a report from the facility's time keeping system for twenty dates. These dates included: 02/22/25 thru 03/01/2506/22/25 thru 06/28/2512/31/2501/01/2602/14/2602/15/2605/31/2606/01/26 These records were reviewed for eight (8) hours of RN hours worked per day, plus calculations made to determine if the facility met the 2.25 hours per patient day minimum. It was determined the facility did not have eight (8) hours of RN staffing on 01/01/26. b) Staff interview During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 06/10/2026 at 3:19 PM, the NHA indicated an RN worked 1.25 hours and got sick. They…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL's) to maintain good personal hygiene for dependent residents. This is true for 0ne (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for ADL care. Resident Identifiers: #20, #17, #33, #23, #16 and #34. Facility census: 54. Findings included: a) Resident #17 During an annual recertification with a simultaneous complaint investigation for Residents not being groomed adequately found Resident #17 on 11/11/24 not get his showers per schedule. Medical record review revealed, Resident #17's shower schedule and preference are two (2) times weekly. A continued review of Resident #17s ADL documentation found: No documentation for showers given. On 11/12/24 at 1:11 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the facility could not provide documentation for Resident #17's showers. b) Resident #20 During an observation 11/11/24 at about 1:54 PM Resident #20 appeared to be unkept, with oily hair and facial hair. Medical record review revealed, Resident #20's shower schedule and preference are two (2)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #18's environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible; and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Resident #18 had a care plan for nonskid footwear which were not in place at the time of a fall. The Central Supply closet which contained harmful chemicals was not secured by a locking door. Resident identfieir: #18. Facility census: 54. Findings included: Resident #18 a) Record review of nursing progress notes dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 was found on the floor with a head injury and complaining of right leg pain. It was noted that Resident #18's feet were bare during assessment after the fall. On [DATE] at 3:15PM, During an interview with the Director of Nursing and the Assistant Director of Nursing They both confirmed resident #18 did not have nonskid footwear on at the time of her fall. Resident #18's Care Plan, dated back to [DATE], revealed the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility failed to serve food in a safe sanitary manner in regards to hand washing after coughing and touching soiled items and storing medical ice packs in the freezer in the residents pantry. This has the potential to affect all resident that gets their nutrition form the kitchen. Facility census: 54. Findings Included: a) Resident Pantry During the tour on 11/11/24 at 12:20 PM to the Resident pantry found multiple medical Ice packs stored in resident freezer. An interview 11/11/24 at 12:20 PM with the Dietary Manager confirmed the medical ice packs should not be stored with resident food. b) Kitchen An observation on the second tour to the kitchen 11/13/24 at 12:35 PM found the [NAME] #46 testing holding temperatures, she coughed and stepped away to the office area, she then opened the trash with her hands, returned to tray line and started to continue temperature testing without washing her hands until surveyor intervention. [NAME] #46 verified she should have washed her hands prior to returning to steam table, she stated that she forgot. During an interview 11/13/24 at 1:18…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated with dignity and respect, as demonstrated by leaving urinary catheter bags uncovered. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers #47 and #257. Facility census: 54. Findings included: a) Resident #47 On 11/12/24 at approximately 11:50 AM, Resident #47 was observed wheeling her chair down the corridor with her uncovered catheter bag and tubing resting in her lap. During an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 at approximately 11:55 AM on 11/12/24, the RN confirmed that the catheter bag should not be placed in the resident's lap and should have been covered. The RN instructed a Nursing Assistant (NA) to find a cover for the resident's catheter bag or to place a blanket over the resident's lap immediately. The RN also confirmed that Resident #47 requires a two-person lift and cannot get into her chair without assistance. A review of Resident #47's care plan revealed the following: This resident is unable to do the following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to promote self-determination and honor resident preferences regarding bathing/showers. This was true for two (2) out of five (5) residents reviewed under choices. Resident identifiers: #23 and #33. Facility census: 54. Findings included: a) Resident #23 During an interview, on 11/12/24 at 12:15 PM, Resident #23 reported she had not had a bath in a week. She also stated she had asked a half a dozen people not to have her shower day on Tuesday because she does not like to attend church services with her hair wet. The resident stated, I must not have asked the right people because they keep doing it. Resident #23 went on to state, I frequently do not accept a shower on Tuesdays because of my preference to not have wet hair when going to church but despite telling each CNA about my preference to have a different shower day, it has never been changed. A record review completed on 11/12/24 at 1:08 PM, confirmed resident's refusals…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 33% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV