Maplewood Healthcare Center
1081 Maplewood Drive, Bridgeport, WV 26330 · For profit - Corporation · 77 certified beds · (304) 842-4135 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $7,443 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-07)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 34% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.0% | 14.7% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.7% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.9% | 7.6% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.7% | 4.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.5% | 15.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 37.1% | 27.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 97.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.7% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.8% | 22.1% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.9% | 13.4% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.5% | 79.4% | 79.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.82 | 1.80 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.22 | 1.84 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
28.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 28.8%CMS range 19.8–42.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 7.4–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.8%CMS range 5.3–14.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.38 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 77 beds and averages 75.8 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration to residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for medications. This deficient practice caused harm to Resident #15. Resident #15 experienced seizures as a result of not receiving anticonvulsant medication as ordered and required an emergency room evaluation and medical testing. Resident identifiers: #15 and #24. Facility census: 76. Findings included: a) Resident #15 Resident #15 was admitted in August 2023. He had diagnoses of cerebral palsy, seizures, and moderate intellectual disabilities. His most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 09/12/23 showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #15's physician's orders showed an order for brivaracetam (Briviact) 100 mg, two (2) times a day for seizures. The resident had been receiving this medication since 08/05/22. Review of Resident #15's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the portions specified on the facility's approved production sheets and failed to consistently provide menu items as planned. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the facility's dietary department. Facility census: 76Findings include: During an observation of the lunch tray line on 06/10/26 beginning at approximately 12:30 p.m., [NAME] #94 was observed serving roasted squash. The facility's serving utensil was a four (4) ounce scoop; however, the scoop was not filled to capacity. The scoop was frequently less than half full and at times only approximately half full before being placed on resident trays. This practice continued for approximately 15 minutes while meal trays for multiple dining room carts were prepared and served.During the observation, [NAME] #94 was interviewed regarding the serving portions. [NAME] #94 stated, I'm doing the best I can, but I'm starting to run out and I have more halls left to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident grievances were appropriately tracked, resolved, and reviewed by the designated grievance official/administrator. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure grievance documentation was completed, including administrator review and signature. This deficient practice affected Resident #74 and had the potential to affect more than a minimal number of residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 76.Findings include:a) Resident #74Record review completed on 06/11/26 of the facility's Resident Council meeting minutes revealed Resident #74 reported during the February 2026 meeting that a pair of green pajama pants was missing. Review of the facility's grievance log revealed no grievance had been initiated for this concern.Further review of the March 2026 Resident Council meeting minutes revealed Resident #74 again voiced concerns regarding the missing pajama pants. A grievance form dated 03/26/26 documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation and staff interviews, the facility failed to have/keep the required documentation for Quality Assessment meetings (QAA). Additionally, the facility did not have required attendees present or sign in at the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meeting logs. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. Facility Census: 76. Findings included: During an interview with both the Director Of Nursing and Regional Director Clinical Operations (RDCO) on 01/14/26 at approximately 8:50 AM, both stated they had been looking for the Quality Assurance (QAPI/QAA) books or records since the survey team entered the facility. Unfortunately, they were unable to locate documentation to show their meetings and what was discussed. They provided the names of the active participants from the meetings, but only a few sign in sheets had been found. They stated the main focus of the facility had been wounds, falls and weights. If they locate any documentation before exit they will bring it to surveyors. RDCO was able to locate sign…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Interview and Record review the facility did not evidence of the required attendees being present or having them sign in to verify their presence at the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meeting. This was discovered during the regular survey process and has the ability to effect more then a limited number of residents. Census 76.During an interview with both the Director of Nursing (DON) and Regional Director Clinical Operations (RDCO) on 01/14/2026 at approximately 8:50 AM, both stated they have been looking for the Quality Assurance (QAPI/QAA) books or records since the survey team entered the facility. Unfortunately, they were unable to locate documentation to show their meetings and what was discussed. They provided the names of the active participants from the meetings, but only a few sign in sheets had been found. They stated the main focus of the facility has been wounds, falls and weights. They said If they located any documentation before exit they will bring it to surveyors. RDCO was able to locate sign in sheets for the last twelve (12) months. However, they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections including Covid-19 in regard to, precaution signage on resident doors. This had the potential to affect all residents that reside in the facility. Resident identifiers: #60 and #62. Facility Census: 76. a) Observations on 01/06/26 at 1:13 PM revealed no signs near the door frames of room B2. Interview on 01/06/26 at 1:13 PM with Nurse Aid #38 she verified that both residents in room B2 were on isolation precautions. Continues review revealed Resident # 60's clinical record revealed that theresident was diagnosed with Covid-19 on 01/02/26 and was placed on precautions. Subsequent review revealed Resident # 62's clinical record revealed that theresident was diagnosed with Covid-19 on 01/06/26, was placed on precautions. During an interview on 01/06/26 at 1:25 PM Licensed Practical Nurse #46 verified there was no precautionary signage for Covid-19 on room B2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview and Operation Policy review the facility failed to ensure they implemented the facility written abuse policy in regard to investigating and reporting to proper agencies an alleged allegation of abuse or neglect. This has potential to affect all residents that reside at the facility. Resident identifier: #47 and #9. Facility census: 76. Findings included: a) Resident #47 Record review of the facility's policy titled, [NAME] Virigina Abuse, Neglect, & Misappropriation, showed: Protection from AbuseIn the event the alleged abuse involves a resident to resident altercation, the resident will be separated by staff, and the appropriate physical assessment will be completed on each resident. All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, injury of unknown source, and misappropriation of property will be reported to the Executive Director immediately. The Executive Director / Designee will report incidents to OHFLAC, APS, The Regional Ombudsman, and other local authorities.If the event that caused…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and operation policy the facility failed to report alleged violations related to, neglect, or abuse, and report the results of all investigation to the proper authorities within prescribe time frames. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #9 and #47. Facility census: 76. Findings include: a) Resident #9 During an interview, on 01/06/26 at 9:55 AM, Resident #9 said he fell while being transferred by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on 01/12/25 and fractured his other femur. On 01/07/26 at 10:00 AM this surveyor spoke with the Director of Nursing (DON) about Resident #9's fall. The surveyor asked for the reportable and the five (5) day follow-ups for the incident. She said she could not provide it because it was not completed. On 01/12/26 at 2:45 PM this surveyor spoke to the DON again about Resident #9 two (2) falls. She told me that the social worker was terminated on 05/08/25 for not completing the reportable or the five-day follow-up. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) had a teachable moment on 01/13/25 for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, and operation policy, the facility failed to report the results of an investigation to the appropriate officials in accordance with State law, within five (5) working days of the incident. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Resident identifier #9, #47 and #40. Facility census: 76 Findings include: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect & Misappropriation, showed: - In the event an allegation is made, the facility will take measures to protect residents from harm during an investigation. Accurate and timely reporting of incidents, both alleged and substantiated, will be sent to officials in accordance with the state law. If the alleged violation is verified, appropriate corrective action will be taken by the facility. - The Director of Nursing (DON) and Executive Director (ED) receives reports of resident incidences. - The Executive Director / designee will report appropriate incidents to OHFLAC, APS, the Regional Ombudsman, and other local authorities, including but not limited to local…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to implement their abuse prohibition policy in regards to identifying and reporting all allegations of abuse and/or neglect. The facility failed report all allegations of abuse and or neglect to required agencies within the required time frames. This was a random opportunity for discovery and was true for 13 residents for a total of 15 allegations. Resident Identifiers; Resident #4, #50, #54, #16, #60, ##32, #33, #29, #73, #68, #76, #77, and #78. Facility Census: 74. Findings Include: a) Policy Review A review of the facility;s policy Titled: [NAME] Virginia Abuse, neglect, and Misappropriation Policy with an effective date of 10/17/24 found the following: .Alleged Violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, visitors, and staff or others but has not yet been investigated and, if verified, could be noncompliance with the federal requirements related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to report all allegations and five (5) day follow up reports of abuse and or neglect to required agencies within the required time frames. This was a random opportunity for discovery and was true for 13 residents for a total of 16 allegations. Resident identifiers: #4, #50, #54, #16, #60, #32, #33, #29, #73, #68, #76, #77, and #78 Facility census: 74. Findings include: a) A review of the facility's filed grievances for the previous 12 months on 05/07/25 found the following allegations of abuse and/or neglect contained on the grievance forms: -- 05/29/24 Resident # 4 grievance voiced during the resident council and read as follows: resident stated CNA (First Name of Nurse Aide (NA) #56) yelled at her for pushing her call bell resident states w/c is dirty. -- 06/24/24 Resident #76's family voiced this grievance to the DON , Hospice and Social Services and it read as follows: yesterday residents wife found him undressed from the waist down. His shirt had not been changed for several days. He had food from his tray and BM up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to adequately deploy nursing staff across all shifts to properly care for residents and their safety. This was found to be true for 15 (fifteen) of 15 calendar days. Facility census: 74. Findings included: Nurse staffing postings review revealed the following: 11/02/24: Facility census: 74 LPN on night shift: 3 CNA on night shift: 2 CNA/resident ratio: 1:37 (one CNA for every 37 residents) 11/03/24: Facility census: 74 LPN on night shift: 4 CNA on night shift: 3 CNA/resident ratio: 1:25 11/07/24: Facility census: 73 LPN on night shift:3 CNA on night shift: 5 CNA/resident ratio: 1:11 11/09/24: Facility census: 74 LPN on night shift:3 CNA on night shift: 4 CNA/resident ratio: 1:18 11/10/24: Facility census: 74 LPN on night shift:2 CNA on night shift: 5 CNA/resident ratio: 1:15 12/25/24: Facility census: 74 LPN on night shift:2 CNA on night shift: 3 CNA/resident ratio: 1:25 12/31/24: Facility census: 75 LPN on night shift:2 CNA on night shift: 5 CNA/resident ratio: 1:15 2/26/25: Facility census: 76…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to post nurse staffing with accurate information reflecting the actual hours worked, and total hours worked by category for nursing. This was true for 14 (fourteen) of 15 (fifteen) calendar days reviewed. The facility also failed to accurately reflect Facility census:75 Findings included: A) Record review 11/02/24: Nurse Staffing Report recorded a total of 191.50 hours worked for RNs, LPNs, and Certified Nurse Aides. Time and attendance report records a total of 221.88 hours worked for RNs, LPNs, and Certified Nurse Aides. 11/03/24: Nurse Staffing Report recorded a total of 337 hours worked for RNs, LPNs, and Certified Nurse Aides. Time and attendance report records a total of 227.5 hours worked for RNs, LPNs, and Certified Nurse Aides. 11/07/24: Nurse Staffing Report recorded a total of 240.5 hours worked for RNs, LPNs, and Certified Nurse Aides. Time and attendance report records a total of 260.5 hours worked for RNs, LPNs, and Certified Nurse Aides. 11/09/24: Nurse Staffing Report recorded a total of 307 hours worked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure each resident received medically related social services. The facility failed to assist the residents in the assertion of their right related to being free from abuse and or neglect and comprehensive person-centered care planning. This was random opportunity for discovery and has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #75, #6, #77, #4, #54, #16, #32, #60, #78, #33, #29, #50, #73, #68, and #16. Facility Census: 74. Findings include: a) A review of the SOM found medically related social services include Advocating for residents and assisting them in the assertion of their rights within the facility in accordance with §483.10, Resident Rights, §483.12, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, §483.15, Transitions of Care, §483.20, Resident Assessments (PASARR), and §483.21, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning. b) Care Plan with Interdisciplinary Team 1) State Agency Complaint The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete record for Resident #56. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed under the care area of falls. Resident identifier: #56. Facility census: 74. Findings Include: a) Resident #56 On 05/07/25 at 12:30 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #56. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility. The transfer forms were noted with errors as follows: --Transfer date 11/01/24; incorrect date of 09/06/24 --Transfer date 11/25/24; incorrect date of 11/01/24 --Transfer date 03/04/25; incorrect date of 11/25/24 On 05/07/25 at 1:30 PM, the Administrator was notified and confirmed the dates on the transfer forms were incorrect.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or resident representative were afforded the right to participate in the care planning process with all required members of the interdisciplinary team. This was true for two (2) of two (2) sampled residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Resident Identifiers: #6 and #75. Facility Census: 74. Findings Include: a) State Agency Complaint The state agency received a complaint on 11/18/24 which indicated the following: The complainant was contacted by the facility's Social Worker about a care plan meeting for her mom. She said that the social worker normally only contacts her the day before or the day of the meeting but on this occasion, she did contact her a few days prior. This was helpful because she wanted to review her mom's care plan prior to the meeting. The complainant stated the social worker was the only staff member present on the care plan meeting that was held on the phone. She said she knew there was no interdisciplinary team there when this was going on. b) Facility's Process for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain infection control standards Resident #53's urinary catheter. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #53. Facility Census: 74. Findings include: a) Resident #53 On 05/07/25 at 3:24 PM, Resident #53's urinary catheter drainage bag was touching the floor. On 05/07/25 at 3:28 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #55 raised the resident's bed up to keep the urinary catheter drainage bag from touching the floor. On 05/07/25 at 3:35 PM, the Administrator was notified of the infection control breach. The Administrator stated, it should not be touching the floor. On 05/07/25 at 4:20 PM, the facility policy entitled, Catheter Care was reviewed. Section V under the heading of procedure states, Check that collection bag is not on the floor and is draining properly and secured allowing for no reflux of urine back to the bladder. (Typed as written.)
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-06 · tag F0641 — widespreadEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a qualified staff person assessed each resident's activity pursuits by not providing a qualified activity professional. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 76. Findings included: a) During an interview, on 03/05/24 at 01:00 PM, with Activity Director (AD), she stated she was currently enrolled in the Modular Education Program for Activity Professionals (MEPAP) class and had been employed since May of 2023. On 03/05/24 at 01:30 PM, the Executive Director (ED) confirmed the Activity Director (AD) had been employed since May of 2023 and had worked for eight (8) months without a qualified activity professional overseeing the facility's activity department. A record review, on 03/05/24 at 2:45 PM, revealed the resident's activity assessments are being completed by the AD who is not a Qualified Activity Professional, and the facility did not have a qualified activity professional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the correct alternative menus were posted to be available if the primary menu or immediate selections for a particular meal are not to a resident's liking. This was a random opportunity for discovery, and currently no residents are receiving enteral tube feedings in the facility, therefore; this failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility Census: 76 Findings include: On 03/05/24 at 10:00 AM an Always available menu was observed posted by the daily menus near the dining room showing the following substitutes. -Hot or cold cereal- maple brown sugar oatmeal or variety of cold cereal -Gelatin, pudding, yogurt - variety -fruit cup- Mandarin oranges or peaches -sandwiches Deli meat, meat salad of the day, PB&J, ad grilled cheese -soup- Chicken noodle, tomato, or vegetable -cottage cheese and fruit plate -chef salad (mixed greens with assorted meats, cheese, tomato, and boiled egg) -Tossed salad ( lettuce, cheese, tomato) - Pickled Beets On 03/06/24 at 9:45AM the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to review resident rights during the residents stay. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the Long-Term Care Survey process and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents in the facility. Facility census: 76. Resident identifiers: #54, #3, #59, #22, #43, #25, #76. Findings included: a) During the Resident Council meeting on 03/05/24 at 1:20 PM, Residents #54, #3, #59, #22, #43, #25, #76 stated no one has gone over resident rights with them. On 03/05/24 at 2:54 PM, the Administrator confirmed resident rights had not been reviewed with residents regularly after admission to the facility.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a qualified activity professional for recreational services. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents residing in the facility. Facility Census: 76 Findings included: During an interview, on 03/05/24 at 1:00 PM, with Activity Director (AD), she stated she was currently enrolled in the Modular Education Program for Activity Professionals (MEPAP) class and has been employed since May of 2023. On 03/05/24 at 01:30 PM, the Executive Director (ED) confirmed the Activity Director (AD) has been employed since May of 2023 without a Qualified Activity Professional overseeing the facility's AD.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a safe and sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards of practice. During the kitchen tour it was discovered food was not stored properly and a treatment mask was found in the supply room. These deficient practices had the potential to affect any resident receiving nourishment from the kitchen. Facility census: 76. Findings included: a) Kitchen tour During the kitchen tour, on 03/04/24 at 11:42 AM, it was discovered a box of hamburger patties were opened and exposed in the walk-in freezer and in the storage room there was a treatment mask on a shelving unit. Observation with the Dietary Manager on 03/04/24 at 11:50 AM, verified the hamburger patties were open and exposed to the elements in the walk-in freezer and the treatment mask was lying on a shelf in the storage room.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain the garbage storage area in a sanitary condition. It was discovered the dumpster had a trash bag wedged under the dumpster. Facility census: 76. Findings included: a) Garbage refuse receptacle During an observation of the outside garbage receptacle on 03/07/24 at 11:40 AM, it was discovered a clear garbage bag was wedged under the dumpster. The garbage bag contained treatment masks and absorbent bed pads used for incontinence. An observation with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 03/07/24 at 1:45 PM, verified the garbage bag did not allow for sanitary conditions in the dumpster area.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative/family member in a timely fashion of a significant change and the need to alter treatment. The facility transferred Resident #15 and Resident #35 to the hospital. However, their representatives/family members were not notified of the transfer. This was true for two (2) of six (6) residents reviewed for hospitalizations during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #15 and #35. Facility census: 76. Findings included: a) Resident #15 A medical record review, completed on 03/05/24 at 9:22 PM, revealed the following details: -An electronic Medication Administration Note, dated 04/26/23 at 11:03 AM, documented Resident #15 was experiencing a decreased level of consciousness. It also noted, Resident unable to safely swallow medications at this time. NP [Nurse Practitioner] aware. -A second Nurses Note, dated 04/26/23 at 3:57 PM, documented the nurse practitioner had visited the resident to assess…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence resident/resident's representative were provided a written Notice of Transfer for an acute hospital transfer. This was true for two (2) out six (6) hospital transfers reviewed during the long-term care process. Resident identifiers: #15, and #35. Facility census: 76. Findings included: a) Resident #15's Hospital Transfer on 04/26/23 A medical record review was completed on 03/05/24 at 9:22 PM. The record review revealed Resident #15 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. The record did not reflect the resident/resident's representative was provided a Notice of Transfer. During an interview, on 03/06/24 at 12:00 PM, the Administrator reported the facility had no evidence a Notice of Transfer was provided. b) Resident #35's Hospital Transfer on 01/31/24 A medical record review was completed on 03/05/24 at 9:39 PM. The record review revealed Resident #35 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. The record did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's Pre-admission Screening (PAS) reflected pre-admission diagnoses for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the category of PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Record Review), during the Long-Term Care Survey process. Resident identifiers: #15. Facility census 76. Findings included: a) Resident #15 A record review, completed on 03/04/24 at 2:34 PM, revealed Resident #15 had an admitting diagnosis of bipolar. A PASARR, dated 10/03/22, did not identify Resident #29 had a bipolar diagnosis on Section III, Question 30 of the PAS. This PASARR indicated no Level II was required. A continued record review also revealed there was never a new PAS completed to reveal resident's bipolar diagnosis in order to address whether or not specialized services were needed. During an interview on 03/06/24 at 12:20 PM, the Social Worker acknowledged the 10/03/22 PAS failed to identify the resident's bipolar diagnosis. The Social Worker noted the facility had recently identified the need to review new resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise a resident's person-centered, comprehensive care plan for urinary catheter services. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for urinary catheter care during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #37. Facility census: 76. Findings included: a) Resident #37 A record review on 03/06/24 revealed there was an order for the removal of a urinary catheter on 01/05/24. The current care plan had not been revised to reflect the removal of the urinary catheter. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/06/24 at 12:35 PM, the DON verified the urinary catheter for Resident #37 had been removed on 01/05/24 and the care plan had not been revised to reflect the catheter removal.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to provide an environment as free of accident hazards as possible. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: #48 and #228 Facility census: #76 Findings include: a) Resident #48 On 03/04/24 at 12:15 PM an observation revealed a spray bottle of Clorox cleaner and a spray bottle of Bio-enzymatic odor eliminator left unattended on the window ledge in Resident #48's room. This was accessible to any resident that may happen to wander into the room. There were multiple residents that went throughout the facility either walking or in their wheelchair. During the long-term survey process Resident #55 was observed daily ambulating without supervision throughout A Hall, where the cleaner spray bottles were found. Resident #55 had an active diagnosis of dementia and wandering. The above was confirmed, on 03/04/24 at 12:33 PM, with Certified Nurse Aide #60 who agreed the bottles should not be left unattended. It was also confirmed with the Administrator on 03/05/24 at 11:10 AM. b) Resident #228 On 03/04/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for one (1) of three (3) records reviewed for accurate POST (Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment) forms during the Long-Term Care Survey process. Resident identifier: #51. Facility census: 76. Findings included: a) Resident #51 A brief record review, completed on 03/04/24 at 1:28 PM, identified the resident had a Physician Orders for Treatment (POST) form on file. The facility had obtained verbal consent from the resident's legal representative on 05/19/22. The 2021 POST Form Guidance instructs, If the incapacitated patient's MPOA (Medical Power of Attorney) representative or Health Care Surrogate is unavailable at the time of form completion, this section can be signed by two witnesses for verbal confirmation of agreement from the patient's MPOA representative or health care surrogate. The form should be signed at the earliest available opportunity. During an interview on 03/06/24 at 12:40 PM, the Social Worker acknowledged verbal consent had been accepted almost two (2) years…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was a random opportunity of discovery. Resident Identifiers: #39, #48 and #228. Facility Census: 76 Findings Included: a) Resident #39 On 03/04/24 at 12:33 PM observation was made of Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) #60 passing lunch meal trays on A hall. The CNA passed Resident #39's meal tray without offering the resident any hand hygiene prior to eating her meal. When confirming with the CNA that no hand hygiene was performed and asking if they usually provide hand hygiene she stated, we usually do, you just caught me on an off day, they are up on the meal cart. On 03/04/24 at 12:36 PM CNA #60 confirmed that she should have given the residents their hand hygiene wipes prior to passing their meal tray. This was also confirmed with the Administrator on 03/05/24 at 11:50 AM. b) Resident #48 On 03/04/24 at 12:33 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician, or designee, when there was a need to alter treatment for three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed, when the facility failed to administer medications or failed to obtain laboratory services ordered by the physician. This deficient practice was found to be true for Resident #55 who failed to have laboratory values drawn per physician order , Resident #15 who failed to have laboratory services obtained and failed to receive medication ordered by the physician, and Resident #24 who failed to receive medications ordered by the physician. Resident identifiers: Resident #24, #55, and #15. Census: 76. Findings included: a) Resident #24 A record review, conducted on 11/06/23, for Resident #24, found a physician's order, written on 10/06/23, for Gabapentin oral tablet 600 mg, give one (1) tablet by mouth, two (2) times a day for pain. Further review of the record showed staff had documented the medication, Gabapentin was not available on 10/06/23 starting at 8:33 pm, 10/07/23, 10/08/23, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to report alleged neglect within the required timeframe. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #15. Facility census: 76. Findings included: a) Resident #15 The facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy with effective date 05/01/2017 and revision date 10/27/23 showed the following procedures: - All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately to the Executive Director/designee of the facility. - All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, are reported immediately, but not later than two (2) hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. - If the events that cause the allegations do not result in serious bodily injury, reporting to the administrator (Executive Director) and to other reporting regulatory bodies must occur within…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the timeliness of laboratory services to meet the needs of their residents. This was found true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed in which laboratory services were not obtained in a timely basis for Resident #55 and Resident #15. This deficient practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents residing in the facility. Resident identifiers: Resident #55 and Resident #15. Census: 76. Findings included: a) Resident #55 A record review on 11/06/23, showed Resident #55 to have a diagnosis of Hypomagnesmia (Low Magnesium) and was ordered to have a laboratory study of a magnesium level ordered to be conducted on 06/15/23. A review of the progress notes for Resident #55, showed a progress note, written on 06/16/23 at 1:39 pm, noting the lab was not drawn. Further record review, showed no evidence the laboratory study had been drawn for this order date. An interview, with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 11/07/23 at 9:15 AM, verified the order for the laboratory study for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-20 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to display the most recent State inspection survey results in a readily accessible area frequented by residents. It was discovered the State inspection was not posted in an area frequented by residents. This had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Facility census: 75 Findings included: a) State inspection survey results posting During an observation on 07/20/22 at 1:30 PM, it was discovered the State inspection survey results were located under a shelf at the Nurse's desk, which was not accessible to residents. At 1:56 PM on 07/20/22 the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) verified the State inspection survey results were not located in an area accessible to residents. .
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain appropriate standards for completing the Advanced Directives. This was true for one (1) of 20 residents reviewed during the long-term survey process. Resident Identifiers: #52. Facility Census: 75. Findings included: a) Resident #52 On 07/19/22 at 1:38 PM, a record review of the Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form was completed. The POST form was missing the date when the verbal consent was obtained from the Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA). The POST form also had only one (1) witness's signature verifying the verbal consent was obtained from the MPOA. The POST form requires two (2) witnesses for a verbal consent. The MPOA section was left blank and did not contain the MPOA's name, address and phone number. On 07/20/22 at 3:15 PM, the Administrator confirmed the POST form was missing the date the verbal consent was obtained and had only one witness's signature verifying verbal consent was obtained from the MPOA. The MPOA section was left blank with no name, address or telephone number listed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and medical record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans to meet the psychosocial needs of the residents. Resident (R) #54 and R #6's care plans lack person centered non-pharmacological interventions to assist in dealing with anxiety and depression. This is true for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifiers: R#54 and #6. Facility census: 75. Findings included: a) Resident #54 Review of the medical record on 07/20/22, revealed R #54 is receiving Ativan (anti-anxiety medication) at bed time when needed for anxiety. R #54 is also taking Duloxetine hydrochloride (anti-depressant) twice a day for depression. The care plan identifies the Ativan for anxiety and states under the interventions Patient specific non-pharmacological intervention such as fluids, snacks, rest periods. The care plan is silent for non-pharmacological interventions related to the use of an antidepressant. Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator (RNAC) #66 confirmed the care plan lacks resident specific…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion. Splints had not been applied as ordered by the physician. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of position and mobility. Resident identifier: #22. Facility census: 75. Findings included: a) Resident #22 Review of Resident #22's physician's order found an order written on 11/26/19 for a left hand splint from breakfast to dinner time as tolerated and an order written on 01/17/20 for a left elbow splint from breakfast to dinner time as tolerated. During observation on 07/20/22 at 11:33 AM, Resident #22 was observed to not be wearing the left hand and left elbow splints. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #82 confirmed Resident #22 was not wearing the splints. LPN #82 stated she would have the Nurse Aid (NA) apply the splint. During an interview on 07/20/22 at 12:03 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, respiratory procedure policy, and staff interview the facility failed to provide respiratory services in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was discovered for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for respiratory care. Resident identifier: #59 Facility census: 75 Findings included: a) Resident #59 During a review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident #59, which verified the face mask for the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was being cleaned daily, but the tubing was not being cleaned weekly as recommended. A review of the CPAP procedure policy recommended the face mask to be cleansed daily with soap and water and the tubing was to be cleansed weekly with soap and water. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 07/20/22 at 12:30 PM, the DON reported their standard of practice was to clean the CPAP tubing once weekly and the face mask was to be cleaned daily. The DON verified the CPAP tubing was not be cleaned weekly. .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . The facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet residents' needs. Resident #71's medications were not received in a timely manner following her admission. This was true for one (1) of two (2) closed record reviews. Resident identifier: #71. Facility census: 75. Findings included: a) Resident #71 Review of Resident #71's medical records showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] at 4:52 PM. Review of Resident #71's Medication Administration Record showed the resident had not received the following medications after admission: --06/22/22: Insulin Glargine Solution Pen-injector, 35 units, subcutaneously at bedtime related to type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, scheduled to be given at 9:00 PM --06/23/22: Isosorbide Mononitrate, 60 mg, one time a day related to essential hypertension, scheduled to be given at 9:00 AM --06/23/22: Januvia Tablet, 50 mg, one time a day related to type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, scheduled to be given at 9:00 AM --06/23/22: Metoprolol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #54's as needed anti-anxiety medication was limited to 14 days. This is true for one (1) of five (5) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifier: #54. Facility census: 75. Findings include: a) Resident (R) #54 Review of the medical record on 07/20/22 found R #54 was prescribed Ativan as needed for anxiety at bed time. The order written on 07/15/22 states: Ativan Tablet 0.5 mg Give 0.5 mg by mouth as needed for anxiety at bedtime. The order lacks a stop date to identify the 14 day limit. During an interview on 07/20/22 at 11:00 AM, the administrator acknowledged R #54's Ativan order lacks a 14 day stop date. .
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Expired medications were found in the medication preparation room floor stock. Facility census: 75. Findings included: a) Medication Storage and Labeling Facility Task On 07/20/22 at 2:03 PM, inspection of the medication preparation room was made under the observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #31. Two (2) bottles of UTI-stat liquid were found to have expired in April 2022 and two (2) bottles of UTI-stat liquid were found to have expired in June 2022. LPN #31 confirmed the four (4) bottles of UTI-stat had expired. No further information was provided through the completion of the survey. .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. During the kitchen tour, food was found not dated after opening. This had the potential to affect a limited number of residents receiving nourishment from the kitchen. Facility census: 75 Findings included: a) Kitchen tour During the kitchen tour on 07/19/22 at 11:07 AM, the freezer contained a package of chicken patties, which had not been dated after opening. An interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 07/19/22 at 11:09 AM, verified the package of chicken patties had not been dated when opened. .
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$7,443 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $7,443 — penalty dated 2023-11-07
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCA NH HOLDINGS OP CO., LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 04/14/2023 |
| C.R. STOLTZ FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| C.R. STOLTZ IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| HEALTH CARE HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| I. ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| I. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| MARANTZ WV HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| R.S. WILHEIM IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| RCA HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| RONALD S WILHEIM 2012 SPOUSAL TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| RRW, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| S.L. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| WILHEIM FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC. | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| GROVES, DONNA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| ROMEO, DOMINIC | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| STOLTZ, CHARLES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| WILHEIM, RONALD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| BP WV MAPLEWOOD MGT CO., LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| DIXON, REBECCA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| VASICEK, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2023 |
| ODENTHAL, RICHARD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 34% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515194. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.